Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2014 Jun 12;109(9):1472–1481. doi: 10.1111/add.12600

Table 2.

Association between documented BIa and resolution of unhealthy alcohol useb among Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatients who initially screened positive.

Documented BI
Resolved unhealthy alcohol use
Unadjusted prevalence of resolved unhealthy alcohol use
Adjusted prevalence of resolved unhealthy alcohol use (RE)
No BI
BI
No BI
BI
n n (%) n (%) % % P-valuec % (95% CI) % (95% CI) P-valued
Main results in overall sample 6210 1751 (28%) 2922 (47%) 46% 49% 0.06 47% (42–52%) 48% (42–54%) 0.50
Results of secondary post-hoc analyses in subsamples defined by severity of unhealthy alcohol use
AUDIT-C < 8 3905 992 (25%) 1874 (48%) 47% 51% 0.02 48% (43-53%) 51% (45–56%) 0.19
AUDIT-C ≥ 8 2305 759 (33%) 1048 (45%) 45% 46% 0.66 45% (40–50%) 45% (39–51%) 0.90
Sample without AUD/TX 3979 987 (24%) 1861 (47%) 46% 48% 0.26 47% (43–53%) 48% (42–54%) 0.57
a

BI = brief intervention documented in the electronic medical record with a clinical reminder.

b

Primary study outcome defined as screening negative on the follow-up Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption (AUDIT-C) with at least a 2-point reduction in score.

c

χ2 test for difference in proportion of patients with resolution.

d

Wald test for multi-level regression model coefficients for documentation of brief intervention (yes/no).

CI = confidence interval; AUD = alcohol use disorder; TX = receipt of specialty addictions treatment in the year prior to initial positive alcohol screening.