Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are potentially valuable cell sources for disease models and future therapeutic applications; however, inefficient generation and the presence of integrated transgenes remain as problems limiting their current use. Here, we developed a new Sendai virus vector, TS12KOS, which has improved efficiency, does not integrate into the cellular DNA, and can be easily eliminated. TS12KOS carries KLF4, OCT3/4, and SOX2 in a single vector and can easily generate iPSCs from human blood cells. Using TS12KOS, we established iPSC lines from chimpanzee blood, and used DNA array analysis to show that the global gene-expression pattern of chimpanzee iPSCs is similar to those of human embryonic stem cell and iPSC lines. These results demonstrated that our new vector is useful for generating iPSCs from the blood cells of both human and chimpanzee. In addition, the chimpanzee iPSCs are expected to facilitate unique studies into human physiology and disease.
Introduction
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) artificially produced from mammalian somatic cells including mouse and rat, human, marmoset, rhesus monkey, and pig can be induced to undergo sustained, unlimited growth and give rise to various cell types in vitro [1]–[7]. Because of these features, iPSCs have important potential applications as a source for cell therapy in clinical medicine. The iPSCs derived from patients also represent a powerful tool both for understanding disease pathogenesis and for investigating the effects of drugs at the individual and disease level on patient-derived cells [8].
While iPSCs derived from a range of mammalian species could serve as useful translational and disease models for cell and drug therapies, cell lines derived from nonhuman primates are particularly useful for such studies because the anatomical and physiological features of these species tend to be more similar to human than those of other mammals [9], [10]. Among nonhuman primates, the chimpanzee is often not a suitable experimental model because of breeding limitations; however, the chimpanzee shares some important physiological features with humans such as surface antigen cross-recognition by antibodies [11], [12]. Chimpanzees and humans occasionally share common pathogens, including ebola virus and hepatitis virus type B [13]. Thus, chimpanzee cells and stem cells derived from them represent powerful tools for both research and clinical applications in human disease.
The process of iPS cell generation, known as reprogramming, is triggered by the expression of four transcription factors, Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc, which are the same core factors underlying pluripotency in other stem cells such as embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [14]. Since overexpression of the four factors was initially mediated by lentivirus and retrovirus vectors in human skin-derived fibroblasts [5], [15], many methods have been reported including those involving transposons [16], proteins [17], microRNAs [18], and plasmids [19]. Recent progress has seen the increasing use of either plasmids or Sendai virus (SeV) vectors to generate iPS cells easily and quickly from human peripheral blood cells [20], [21]. Both methods are simple to conduct compared to other procedures, and are safer because there is no integration of transgenes into the host genome; however, the frequency of iPS cell colony generation remains low (∼0.1%) and it is difficult to attain completely vector-free iPSCs.
Here, we generated a new SeV vector that enables highly efficient generation of iPS cells from peripheral blood cells, is temperature-sensitive (TS), and is quickly and efficiently eliminated from the established iPSCs by temperature shift. In addition to the generation of human iPSCs, we succeeded in establishing iPSC lines derived from the blood cells of chimpanzees.
Results
Vector generation
We previously generated iPSCs by using SeV vectors containing the sequences for four reprogramming factors (OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4 and c-MYC) [22]. Here, to increase the efficiency of iPSC generation and reduce the length of time the vector remains inside the cells, we generated a new TS-SeV vector, TS12KOS, carrying coding sequences for three of the above factors, KLF4 (K), OCT3/4 (O), and SOX2 (S) ( Fig. 1a ) tandemly linked in the KOS direction. The TS12KOS vector contains three mutations that produce alanine residues (D433A, R434A, and K437A) in the large protein (L)-binding domain of the phosphoprotein (P), a component of SeV RNA polymerase. SeV carrying these three mutations showed moderate expression of GFP at 37°C, but weak expression at temperatures above 38°C [23]. In a previous study, c-MYC was inserted between the sequences encoding the HN and L proteins in the TS15 SeV vector (HNL/TS15 c-MYC), which carries two other mutations (L1361C and L1558I) in addition to the triple mutation described above [23]. This vector is also temperature-sensitive and only weakly expressed at temperatures greater than 37°C. In this study, TS12KOS vector and a cocktail of conventional vectors carrying three reprogramming factors individually (OCT3/4, SOX2 and KLF4), namely the conventional vectors, were used with HNL/TS15 c-MYC in following experiments.
First, we compared TS12KOS with the conventional SeV vectors for the efficiency of iPSC generation from human skin fibroblasts of healthy volunteers ( Fig. 1b ). Based on the numbers of colonies showing alkaline phosphatase (AP)-positive staining and human ESC-like morphology on day 28 after induction, we found that the efficiency of iPSC generation was significantly higher using the TS12KOS vector than with the conventional vectors.
We next examined the effect of temperature shift on iPSC generation from human fibroblasts. When the culture temperature was shifted from 37°C to 36°C for the initial two weeks after infection, the efficiency of colony formation remained high; however, when the temperature downshift continued for three weeks or more after infection, the efficiency tended to decrease in the samples from healthy volunteers ( Fig. 1c ). Therefore, a temperature downshift for the initial one week only was used in the following experiments.
We next conducted nested RT-PCR analysis of viral RNA to determine whether the TS12KOS vector was eliminated from the iPSCs earlier than the conventional SeV vectors. The nested RT-PCR analysis detects the viral genome with much higher sensitivity than single PCR [24]. We expanded the individual colonies and shifted the temperature from 37°C to 38°C for 3 days at various passages. In the conventional SeV infections, temperature upshifts at passage 1 or 2 induced no virus removal. In contrast, when the temperature of TS12KOS vector-infected cells was upshifted at passages 1 and 2, 84% and 65%, respectively, of iPSC-like clones were negative for viral genomic nucleic acid ( Fig. 1d ). These results indicated the TS12KOS vector superiority over the conventional SeV vectors in both efficiency of iPSC generation and elimination of virus from the iPSCs.
Based on previous findings that L-MYC is safer than c-MYC due to a lower incidence of tumorigenicity, we next examined the effect of replacing the c-MYC cDNA sequences with L-MYC cDNA sequences in the HNL/TS15 c-MYC SeV vector (Fig. S1a) [25]. The frequency of colonies with ALP+ and ESC-like morphology was lower using the L-MYC vector than with the original HNL/TS15 c-MYC vector (Fig. S1b), despite the L-MYC gene showing higher expression levels (data not shown).
Because Glis1 can enhance iPSC generation, we also constructed and tested various SeV vectors carrying GLIS1 sequences (Fig. S1a, c) [26]. Unexpectedly, Glis1 expression did not augment the colony formation from human skin-derived fibroblasts with or without c-Myc, suggesting that Glis1 does not play a part in iPSC induction with SeV vector (Fig. S1c).
Characterization of human iPS cells generated with new virus vector
Our ultimate goal is to develop safe and efficient vectors to generate iPSCs from both human and primate peripheral blood cells. When we stimulated human peripheral T lymphocytes with both anti-CD3 antibody and interleukin 2, and then infected them with SeV vectors, iPSC generation was significantly more efficient using the TS12KOS vector than with the conventional SeV vectors ( Fig. 2a ). In conventional SeV infections, temperature shifts from 37°C to 38°C at passages 1 and 2 induced no elimination of virus from the iPSC clones ( Fig. 2b ). In contrast, when TS12KOS vector was used under the same conditions, 65% and 47%, respectively, of the clones were negative for viral genome ( Fig. 2b ). Therefore, similar to the results obtained with fibroblasts, the elimination of TS12KOS vector from iPS-like cells derived from peripheral T lymphocytes was faster than that observed for the conventional SeV vectors.
The iPSC lines derived from skin fibroblasts and peripheral T lymphocytes induced by TS12KOS vector exhibited a typically ESC-like morphology and expressed a set of typical markers for pluripotency ( Fig. 2c, d ). These iPSC lines had a normal 46 XY karyotype even after the temperature upshift and culturing for more than 10 passages ( Fig. 2e ). To confirm the pluripotency of the clonal lines, we transplanted the lines into the testis of immunodeficient mice. Twelve weeks after injection, the iPSC lines tested formed teratomas that contained derivatives of all three germ layers ( Fig. 2f ). Based on these findings, we conclude that the iPSC lines generated with TS12KOS vector meet the criteria of iPSCs.
Establishment of chimpanzee iPS cells
Next we used the TS12KOS vector to establish iPSC lines from the blood cells of two chimpanzee individuals, with the ultimate goal of overcoming the limited availability of chimpanzee skin-fibroblasts for human medical use. Using the same protocol as for human blood cells, we could establish chimpanzee blood cell-derived iPSCs ( Fig. 3a ). However, the frequency was relatively low and only one cell line that carries the normal karyotype could be established (Experiment 1 in Fig. 3a ). To optimize the induction conditions, we conducted in vitro human T lymphocyte stimulations with anti-CD3, Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA), or Concanavalin A (Con A), and similarly generated iPSCs from human peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNCs) using all three agents, with PHA stimulation the most efficient ( Fig. 3b ). The morphology of iPSC colonies derived from the anti-CD3- and PHA-stimulated PMNCs was distinct from colonies derived from the Con A-stimulated PMNCs ( Fig 3c ), which produced flat colonies with clearer and sharper edges than those derived from CD3- and PHA-stimulated PMNCs. In addition, many of the iPSC colonies derived from CD3- and PHA-stimulated PMNCs contained AP+ cells in the center only ( Fig. 3c ). Together, these results suggested that colonies derived from Con A-stimulated PMNCs most closely fulfill the accepted criteria of iPSCs. Therefore, Con A was used in the following experiment 2 and 3 ( Fig. 3a ).
In addition, we changed the virus titer for infection from MOI 10 to 30 and the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) concentration from 5 ng/ml to 30 ng/ml during the iPSC induction (Fig. S2). The FGF2 change was based on a study of common marmosets, another nonhuman primate, which used 20 ng/ml FGF2 and treated the cultures with sodium butyrate (NaB) during reprogramming to enhance the iPSC colony number [7], [27]. In human blood cells, the efficiency of iPSC generation with 30 ng/ml FGF2 is slightly but not significantly lower than that with 5 ng/ml FGF2 (Fig. S3). Interestingly, these modifications improved the colony frequency and provided many more iPSC colonies during the second round of iPSC induction (Experiment 2 in Fig. 3a ). However, the efficiency of iPSC generation from chimpanzee PMNCs was still lower than that from human blood cells (0.32% vs. 2%, Fig. 3a ). We tried picking up the colonies again and expanded them, before shifting the culturing temperature to 38°C for three days at passage 1 to eliminate the Sendai virus ( Fig. 3a ). The rate of virus elimination from the chimpanzee iPSCs was similar to that from human iPSCs (65.2% vs. 58.6%).
We then compared the efficiency of iPSC generation with TS12KOS vector to that with the conventional SeV vectors (Experiment 3 in Fig. 3a ). Although a high titer (MOI 30) of the conventional SeV vectors could generate chimpanzee iPSCs, TS12KOS vector showed a higher efficiency of iPSC generation (0.073% for the conventional vectors vs. 0.32%, Fig. 3a ). Similarly, the elimination rate of SeV was lower than that observed with the conventional vectors, suggesting that our new vector could more efficiently generate the transgene-free iPSCs from chimpanzee blood cells than the conventional SeV vectors.
The chimpanzee iPSC lines exhibited ESC-like morphology and expressed a set of pluripotent markers ( Fig. 3d, e ), with nested RT-PCR analysis determining that the iPSC lines were negative for SeV genomic material ( Fig. 3e ). To confirm that these cells were truly derived from chimpanzee, we also performed genomic PCR using chimpanzee-specific primers ( Fig. 3f ), with different PCR product sizes allowing us to easily distinguish between chimpanzee and human genes and confirming that the chimpanzee-derived samples contained no human DNA fragments [28]. Karyotype analyses showed that the iPSC lines had a normal karyotype, 48XX, further confirming that the iPSC lines were derived from chimpanzee ( Fig. 3g ).
To investigate the cellular origin of the chimpanzee iPSCs, we performed Southern blot analyses with probes specific for T cell receptor (TCR) DNA ( Fig. 3h ) [29]. Rearranged bands were detected in all iPSC lines, indicating that they were derived from the chimpanzee T lymphocytes.
Characterization of chimpanzee iPSC lines
Finally, we investigated the differentiation potential of the chimpanzee iPSCs lines by evaluating in vitro differentiation and teratoma formation ( Fig. 4a, b ). The appropriate culture conditions induced differentiation into cells representing all three germ layers, ectoderm (βIII-tubulin-positive), mesoderm (BRACHYURY-positive), and endoderm (SOX17-positive) ( Fig. 4a ). Consistent with this finding, histological analysis revealed that formed teratomas contained descendant markers of all three germ cell layers such as cuboidal epithelia, melanin pigment, cartilage, muscle, and various glandular structures ( Fig. 4b ). Taken together, the chimpanzee-derived iPSC lines fulfilled the criteria for iPSCs.
We used microarray analysis to further characterize the chimpanzee iPSC lines. The patterns of global gene expression of three chimpanzee iPSC lines were similar to those of human iPSC lines ( Fig. 4c ). Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering of all genes was conducted to determine overall differences in transcription levels between chimpanzee- and human-derived iPSC lines. Data from human ESCs, iPSCs, fibroblasts, and various tissues were analyzed together with those from chimpanzee iPSCs. Although the chimpanzee iPSC lines were derived from different individuals, their data were grouped by PCA and placed close to those of human ESCs and iPSCs ( Fig. 4c ). The gene-expression profiles of chimpanzee iPSCs were grouped closely to human ESCs and iPSCs in the same branch, and distinctly separated from the branch containing gene profiles of various human tissues ( Fig. 4d ). These results suggested that the global gene expression patterns of chimpanzee iPSC lines are generally similar to those of human ESCs and iPSCs.
Discussion
We developed a new temperature-sensitive SeV vector, TS12KOS, and herein demonstrated it to be an efficient tool for generating iPSCs from both human skin fibroblasts and peripheral blood cells. Using this vector, we also generated chimpanzee iPSC lines from peripheral blood cells.
The iPSCs established with our TS12KOS vector could be made virus-free simply by shifting the temperature from 37°C to 38°C for 3 days, and transgene-free iPSCs could be generated within a week of isolating the iPSC colonies. Unlike previous techniques that don't use SeV vectors, this system does not require multiple cycles of infection. Furthermore, the efficiency of iPSC generation achieved was 20∼100 times higher than that obtained using techniques such as retrovirus, lentivirus, or plasmid vectors [5], [15], [21].
Consideration of the cell source is important when applying iPSC technology to clinical medicine. Although skin fibroblasts are the most common cell type used for generating iPSCs, we consider that peripheral blood cells are preferable because collection is less invasive and is suitable for children and patients with skin or coagulopathy disorders. Here, we demonstrated that the TS12KOS vector generates iPSCs from both skin fibroblasts (∼4%) and peripheral blood cells (∼2%) with high efficiency.
Overexpression of the four ‘reprogramming’ factors needed to generate iPSCs was initially mediated by lentivirus and retrovirus vectors in human skin-derived fibroblasts [5], [15]. Although these gene expression systems are stable, they have two potential problems in that the genes encoding the four factors are integrated into the host genome and remain in the resultant iPSCs, and there is a risk of insertional mutagenesis, which can facilitate tumorigenesis in vivo [30]. The development of efficient and safe reprograming methods based on using Cre/loxP recombination systems, adenovirus vector, piggyback transposons, microRNA, and protein has suffered from a low frequency of iPSC colony generation, a need for repetitive induction, and retention of a short length of foreign DNA in the host genome [16]–[18], [31], [32]. A recent study showed that episomal plasmid vectors, which rarely integrate into the host genome, can be used to generate iPSCs from blood cells; however, the efficiency was low (∼0.1%) and factors such as p53 knock-down and the transient expression of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen (EBNA) were required in addition to the four reprogramming factors [21]. To overcome these remaining iPSC issues, in this study we developed a new type of SeV vector that can easily and efficiently provide transgene-free iPSC lines from human and chimpanzee blood cells. SeV vectors are minus-strand RNA viruses that express a gene of interest without integration into the host genome [33]. Thus, our vector can overcome the obstacles described above.
The iPSCs derived from nonhuman primates are useful tools for regenerative medicine research because of the similarities in anatomy and physiology between those mammalian species and human, and chimpanzee is a particularly useful such model [9], [10]. Chimpanzee and human share much of their genomic DNA sequences, with only ∼1.2% difference [34]. To this end, we also generated transgene-free iPSC lines from chimpanzee blood cells using the new SeV vector. The efficiency of iPSC generation from chimpanzee blood was lower than that from human blood. Stimulation methods of T lymphocytes and human-derived reprogramming factors may affect the efficiency. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to improve the efficiency of iPSC generation from chimpanzee blood. Recently, other group established the chimpanzee iPSC lines from skin-derived fibroblasts with the retrovirus vector [35]. However, it is difficult in collecting many chimpanzee-derived fibroblasts because of breeding limitation for medical use. Our new vector can easily provide the transgene-free iPSCs from the chimpanzee blood cells that is less limited than other tissues.
The chimpanzee iPSC lines established here showed the requisite pluripotency and other features of established iPSCs and thus could provide us with alternative and highly valuable tools. First, they could be used to generate fresh chimpanzee cells, which are valuable cell models and difficult to derive from the animal itself due to breeding limitations. For example, neural cells derived from chimpanzee iPSCs could permit us to study neural development and function, and thus facilitate discovery and increased understanding of the substantial neurological differences between human and chimpanzee despite the largely identical genomes.
Furthermore, the technology used herein could be applied to generate iPSCs from nonhuman primates other than chimpanzees. SeV can infect the blood cells of rhesus monkeys, Macaca fascicularis and marmosets, suggesting that our new vector could also easily induce cell reprogramming and iPSC generation from their blood cells [36], [37]. These approaches are expected to improve our ability to better understand and interrogate the distinguishing traits of human and potentially open up a new field in studying the development of human capacity during evolution.
Methods
iPSC Generation and maintenance
All experimental procedures of human samples were approved by the ethics committees, “ Ethics committee for Epidemiological and General Research at the Faculty of Life Science, Kumamoto University”, “Ethics committee for Human genome and Gene analysis Research at the Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University” and “Ethics committee for clinical research and advanced medical technology, Kumamoto University” (approval numbers 318, 153 and 1018, respectively) and conformed to the human sample use guidelines of the ethics committees. After explaining our study, the volunteers agreed with our study and signed the sheets of written informed consent.
Human skin biopsies and peripheral blood were collected from healthy volunteers following informed consent under protocols approved by the ethics committee assigning authors. For human fibroblast generation, skin samples were minced and cultured in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM, Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The subsequent fibroblast cultures were expanded for iPS cell induction.
The use of the chimpanzees during the experimental period adhered to the Guidelines for Care and Use of Nonhuman Primates (2010) of the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University. The ethical committee of the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University approved the protocols of experimental procedures in this study (Permit Number: 2012-134). Blood samples were obtained from two individuals, Puchi (GAIN-ID:0436) and Ai (GAIN-ID:0434), for routine veterinary and microbiological examination under ketamine anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
To generate iPS cells from peripheral blood cells, mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated by Ficoll gradient method. To stimulate T lymphocytes, MNCs were cultured on anti-CD3 antibody-coated dishes in KBM502 medium (KOHJIN BIO) or RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS and IL-2 for five days. In some experiments, instead of anti-CD3 antibody (eBioScience), 10 µg/ml Phytohemagglutinin (PHA, SIGMA) or 1 µg/ml Concanavalin A (Con A, SIGMA) were used for the stimulation.
iPSCs were generated from human skin-derived fibroblasts and human- and chimpanzee-stimulated T lymphocytes as described previously [20]. Briefly, 1×105 of the MNCs per well of 48-well plate and 5×105 cells of the fibroblasts per well of 6-well plate were seeded one day before infection and then were infected with Sendai virus (SeV) vectors at various multiplicity of infection (MOI) including three, ten and thirty. After two-day culturing for blood cells and seven-day culturing for fibroblasts, the cells infected were harvested by trypsin and re-plated at 5×104 cells per 60 mm dish on the mitomycin C (MMC)-treated mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cells. Next day, the medium was replaced in human iPS cell medium. The cultures with new Sendai virus infection were incubated at 36°C for one week. From 18 to 25 days after infection, colonies were picked up and re-cultured again in the iPS cell medium. In some experiments, FGF2 concentration was modified from 5 ng/ml to 30 ng/ml and NaB was added on day 2 in the iPSC induction. To remove Sendai virus, the temperature of culture shifts from 37°C to 38°C for three days at passage 1 or 2 of iPSCs.
Human and chimpanzee iPSC lines were maintained on MMC-treated MEF feeder cells in the iPS medium containing DMEM/F12 (SIGMA) supplemented with 20% KNOCKOUT serum replacement (KSR, Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine (Life technologies), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (NEAA, SIGMA), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME, SIGMA), 0.5% penicillin and streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque, Japan) and 5 ng/ml or 30 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, WAKO, Japan).
Chimpanzee rearing
At the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University, the subject chimpanzees lived in two mixed-sex groups in an outdoor enclosure that connected to several inside rooms. The outdoor enclosure was separated into two compartments: one was a 700-m2 outdoor compound with 15-m-high climbing frames, a small stream and numerous trees; the other was a 250-m2 outdoor compound with climbing frames and two small streams. Chimpanzees could freely access the outdoor enclosure and inside room at all times. The chimpanzees were fed seasonal fruits and vegetables, along with monkey pellets three times per day and were provided feeding-enrichment items between meals on a few occasions.
Generation of Sendai virus (SeV) vectors
Generation and production of temperature-sensitive Sendai virus vectors were performed as described previously [22]. The conventional type of SeV vectors carrying Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc were also generated as described previously [22]. To generate TS12 vector, three mutations including D433A, R434A and K437A were introduced into the polymerase-related gene P. For TS15 vector generation, three other mutations, Y942H, L1361C, and L1558I, were inserted into polymerase-related genes L of TS12. For “three-in-one” vector, human KLF4, OCT3/4 and SOX2 genes were inserted between P and M gene-encoding region in order as described in Fig. 1A. Each gene was sandwiched by E (End), I (Intervening) and S (Start) sequences.
Karyotype analysis
G band analyses of chromosome were performed by Nihon Gene Research Laboratories. Inc. (Sendai, Japan), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
DNA and RNA Isolations and PCR
Genomic DNA was extracted from chimpanzee iPSC lines as described previously [38]. Total RNA was purified with Sepasol Super G reagent (Nacalai Tesque, Japan). Total RNA was transcribed to DNA with Superscript III (Invitrogen) and randam primers (Invitrogen). Genomic PCR and RT-PCR was performed with QuickTaq (TOYOBO, Japan) as described previously [24], [38]. Primers used for Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc were designed to detect the expressions of endogenous genes, but not of transgenes. To detect SeV genome, nested RT-PCR was performed. The sequences of primers and amplification conditions are listed in Table S1.
Cell staining and Immunocytochemistry
Alkaline phosphatase staining was performed using the Leukocyte Alkaline Phosphatase kit (SIGMA). For immunocytochemistry, cells were fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 4°C. For the molecules localized in nucleus, samples were treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature (RT). The cells were washed three times with PBS containing 2% FBS and then incubated overnight at 4°C in PBS containing 2% FBS with primary antibodies. The list of the primary and secondary antibodies is described in Table S2.
Southern blotting
TCR probe was amplified by PCR as described previously using cDNA of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and labeled with α32P-dCTP by BcaBEST labeling Kit (Takara Bio Co. Ltd). Commercially available membranes–Hybond-N+ (GE Healthcare) were used and hybridization was performed as described previously [38].
Differentiation into three germ layer cells
Mesoderm-like cell cultures were specified based upon a previously described protocol [39]. For the embryoid body (EB) formation, iPSC clusters were transferred to low attachment dishes in DMEM/F12 (SIGMA) supplemented with 20% KSR (Invitrogen) and 10 ng/ml BMP4 (R & D). Next day, the formed EBs were transferred to collagen IV-coated tissue culture plates (BD) in the medoserm induction medium containing alpha-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.1 mM 2ME, 3 ng/ml Activin (R & D) 10 ng/ml BMP4 and 5 ng/ml bFGF (WAKO). On day 4, the cells were harvested and analyzed for BRACHYURY expression. For endoderm-like cell induction, the culture medium of semi-confluent human iPS cells were switched from the iPS medium to the definitive endoderm differentiation medium containing RPMI1640 supplemented with 2% B27 (Life technologies), 100 ng/ml Activin A (R & D) and 1 mM Sodium butyrate (NaB, SIGMA). The NaB concentration is changed in 0.5 mM on day 2. On day4, the cells were stained with anti-SOX17 antibody.
For neural cell induction, the iPSC clusters were plated onto Geltrex plates (Life Technologies). 24 hours later, the culture medium was switched from the iPSC medium to PSC Neural Induction Medium (Life Technologies) containing Neurobasal medium and PSC neural induction supplement [40]. On day 7, the cells were dissociated with TrypLE express (Life Technologies) and re-seeded onto Geltrex-coated plates in NSC expansion medium containing 50% Neurobasal medium, 50% Advanced DMEM/F12, neural induction supplement and 5 µM Rock inhibitor, Y-27632. On day 14, the cells were stained with anti-betaIII tubulin antibody.
Teratoma formation
Human and chimpanzee iPSC lines grown on MEF feeder layers were collected by collagenase IV treatment and injected into the testis of NOD-SCID immunodeficient mice. Palpable tumors were observed about 12–16 weeks after injection. Tumor samples were collected, fixed in 10% formalin, and processed for paraffin-embedding and hematoxylin-eosin staining following standard procedures.
Microarray analysis
Two hundred fifty ng of total RNA from the chimpanzee iPSCs were labeled with biotin and fragmented according to the manufacturer's protocol (3′ IVT Express kit, Affymetrix). Then, samples were hybridized to a GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 (Affymetrix) Arrays were scanned with a GeneChip Scanner 3000(Affymetrix). Data were analyzed using GeneSpring GX 12.5 software (Agilent technologies). Each chip is normalized to the median of the measurements.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All DNA array data can be found at the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The accession number is GSE 62572. Additional materials can be obtained by request from the corresponding author.
Funding Statement
This study was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Project of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. DNAVEC Corporation provided support in the form of salaries for authors MH & HB, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. NF was provided with salary by JST grant (PRESTO). The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the 'author contributions' section.
References
- 1. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Liao J, Cui C, Chen S, Ren J, Chen J, et al. (2009) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from adult rat cells. Cell Stem Cell 4:11–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tomioka I, Maeda T, Shimada H, Kawai K, Okada Y, et al. (2010) Generating induced pluripotent stem cells from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) fetal liver cells using defined factors, including Lin28. Genes Cells 15:959–969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Liu H, Zhu F, Yong J, Zhang P, Hou P, et al. (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult rhesus monkey fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 3:587–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131:861–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, Bao L, Liao J, et al. (2009) Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. J Mol Cell Biol 1:46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wu Y, Zhang Y, Mishra A, Tardif SD, Hornsby PJ (2010) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from newborn marmoset skin fibroblasts. Stem Cell Res 4:180–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hankowski KE, Hamazaki T, Umezawa A, Terada N (2011) Induced pluripotent stem cells as a next-generation biomedical interface. Lab Invest 91:972–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hackett TA, Preuss TM, Kaas JH (2001) Architectonic identification of the core region in auditory cortex of macaques, chimpanzees, and humans. J Comp Neurol 441:197–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rogers J, Gibbs RA (2014) Comparative primate genomics: emerging patterns of genome content and dynamics. Nat Rev Genet 15:347–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mubiru JN, Yang AS, Olsen C, Nayak S, Livi CB, et al. (2014) Analysis of prostate-specific antigen transcripts in chimpanzees, cynomolgus monkeys, baboons, and African green monkeys. PLoS One 9:e94522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rearden A (1986) Evolution of glycophorin A in the hominoid primates studied with monoclonal antibodies, and description of a sialoglycoprotein analogous to human glycophorin B in chimpanzee. J Immunol 136:2504–2509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gonzalez JP, Prugnolle F, Leroy E (2013) Men, primates, and germs: an ongoing affair. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 365:337–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, et al. (2007) In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448:318–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sommer CA, Stadtfeld M, Murphy GJ, Hochedlinger K, Kotton DN, et al. (2009) Induced pluripotent stem cell generation using a single lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells 27:543–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Woltjen K, Michael IP, Mohseni P, Desai R, Mileikovsky M, et al. (2009) piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 458:766–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zhou H, Wu S, Joo JY, Zhu S, Han DW, et al. (2009) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell 4:381–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Miyoshi N, Ishii H, Nagano H, Haraguchi N, Dewi DL, et al. (2011) Reprogramming of mouse and human cells to pluripotency using mature microRNAs. Cell Stem Cell 8:633–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Okita K, Nakagawa M, Hyenjong H, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2008) Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science 322:949–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Seki T, Yuasa S, Oda M, Egashira T, Yae K, et al. (2010) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human terminally differentiated circulating T cells. Cell Stem Cell 7:11–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Okita K, Yamakawa T, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Amano N, et al. (2013) An efficient nonviral method to generate integration-free human-induced pluripotent stem cells from cord blood and peripheral blood cells. Stem Cells 31:458–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Fusaki N, Ban H, Nishiyama A, Saeki K, Hasegawa M (2009) Efficient induction of transgene-free human pluripotent stem cells using a vector based on Sendai virus, an RNA virus that does not integrate into the host genome. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 85:348–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ban H, Nishishita N, Fusaki N, Tabata T, Saeki K, et al. (2011) Efficient generation of transgene-free human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by temperature-sensitive Sendai virus vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:14234–14239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hamasaki M, Hashizume Y, Yamada Y, Katayama T, Hohjoh H, et al. (2012) Pathogenic mutation of ALK2 inhibits induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming and maintenance: mechanisms of reprogramming and strategy for drug identification. Stem Cells 30:2437–2449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nakagawa M, Takizawa N, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2010) Promotion of direct reprogramming by transformation-deficient Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:14152–14157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Maekawa M, Yamaguchi K, Nakamura T, Shibukawa R, Kodanaka I, et al. (2011) Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1. Nature 474:225–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mali P, Chou BK, Yen J, Ye Z, Zou J, et al. (2010) Butyrate greatly enhances derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by promoting epigenetic remodeling and the expression of pluripotency-associated genes. Stem Cells 28:713–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. McLean CY, Reno PL, Pollen AA, Bassan AI, Capellini TD, et al. (2011) Human-specific loss of regulatory DNA and the evolution of human-specific traits. Nature 471:216–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Langerak AW, Wolvers-Tettero IL, van Dongen JJ (1999) Detection of T cell receptor beta (TCRB) gene rearrangement patterns in T cell malignancies by Southern blot analysis. Leukemia 13:965–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, et al. (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 26:101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J, Weir G, Hochedlinger K (2008) Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science 322:945–949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Beard C, Gao Q, Bell GW, et al. (2009) Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 136:964–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nagai Y TA, Irie T, Yonemitsu Y, Gotoh B (2011) Sendai virus: Evolution from mouse pathogen to a state-of-the-art tool in virus research and biotechnology. The biology of Paramyxoviruses Samal SK, Ed, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK: 115–173. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Cooper DN (2007) Understanding the recent evolution of the human genome: insights from human-chimpanzee genome comparisons. Hum Mutat 28:99–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Marchetto MC, Narvaiza I, Denli AM, Benner C, Lazzarini TA, et al. (2013) Differential L1 regulation in pluripotent stem cells of humans and apes. Nature 503:525–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sasaki K, Inoue M, Shibata H, Ueda Y, Muramatsu SI, et al. (2005) Efficient and stable Sendai virus-mediated gene transfer into primate embryonic stem cells with pluripotency preserved. Gene Ther 12:203–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fusaki N BH, Nagai Y (2014) Induction of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by the Sendai Virus Vector: Establishment of a Highly Efficient and Footprint-Free System. Sendai Virus Vector: Advantages and Applications Springer 171–183.
- 38. Kitagawa M, Takebe A, Ono Y, Imai T, Nakao K, et al. (2012) Phf14, a novel regulator of mesenchyme growth via platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor-alpha. J Biol Chem 287:27983–27996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sakurai H, Era T, Jakt LM, Okada M, Nakai S, et al. (2006) In vitro modeling of paraxial and lateral mesoderm differentiation reveals early reversibility. Stem Cells 24:575–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yan Y, Shin S, Jha BS, Liu Q, Sheng J, et al. (2013) Efficient and rapid derivation of primitive neural stem cells and generation of brain subtype neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2:862–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All DNA array data can be found at the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The accession number is GSE 62572. Additional materials can be obtained by request from the corresponding author.