Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2009 Jan 1;11(1):65–68. doi: 10.1021/ol802247m

Triple Hybrids of Steroids, Spiroketals, and Oligopeptides as New Biomolecular Chimeras

Abhisek Banerjee &, Eduard Sergienko #, Stefan Vasile #, Vineet Gupta ^, Kristiina Vuori #, Peter Wipf &,
PMCID: PMC4257705  NIHMSID: NIHMS86658  PMID: 19067551

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms86658u1.jpg

An oxidative enol ether rearrangement methodology was the key methodology in the construction of steroid-spiroketal-RGD peptides. Biological studies demonstrated potent integrin CD11b/CD18 antagonistic effects.


Steroids are often conjugated to other building blocks which modulate their biological activity.1 For example, carbohydrates are attached to the steroid A-ring hydroxyl groups and D-ring side chains, and the resulting hybrid molecules have improved solubility and modified physico-chemical properties as well as distinct biological functions. Synthetic sugar-steroid conjugates have been shown to target phospholipid membranes.2 Peptide-steroid conjugates have been applied as artificial proteolytic enzymes,3 mimics of cationic antibiotics,4 and as synthetic receptors for oligopeptides (Figure 1).5 The steroid skeleton is rearranged into a spiroketal moiety in hippurin-1,6 cephalostatins and ritterazine M,7 which show potent reversal of multidrug resistance and anticancer activities. A library approach toward the synthesis of peptidomimetic spirostane hybrids took advantage of the 4-component Ugi reaction,8 and macrocyclic hybrid structures were assembled with the goal to construct chiral host molecules.9 However, conjugates of spiroketal modified steroids to peptides or peptide mimetics have not yet been explored; we hypothesizd that these chimeras could demonstrate interesting membrane affinities and receptor recognition properties.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Selected natural and designed steroid-peptide, steroid-amino acid, and steroid-spiroketal hybrid structures.27

We have recently demonstrated an oxidative rearrangement of enol ethers to lactones and spiroketal esters.10 Our methodology allows for a rapid formation of these common structural subunits (Scheme 1). We now report an extension of this methodology for the construction of a small library of steroid-spiroketal-peptide triple hybrid structures that were designed to anchor the RGD motif in the cell membrane. The tripeptide sequence Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)1134,35 is widely used for cell adhesion studies, as it is recognized by many integrins, including αVβ3 (Kd ≈ 10−9 M).12 Several integrin antagonists based on the RGD sequence have been designed for applications in the control of angiogenesis, tumor cell metastasis, osteoporosis, and other diseases.13 However, the development of selective integrin antagonists still constitutes a major challenge in RGD mimetic design.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Oxidative rearrangement of alkyl enol ethers

Our synthesis of the steroid spiroketal carboxylic acid 5 began with commercially available epi-androsterone (1). Treatment of 1 with 5-lithio-2,3-dihydrofuran followed by the acidic Dowex 50X initiated a pinacol-type14 rearrangement (Scheme 2). Enolization and O-methylation of ketone 2 was performed with KHMDS and Me2SO4 in a 4:1 mixture of THF and DMF. Other conditions led to significant amounts of C-methylation. The reaction of the enol ether 3 with m-CPBA buffered with Na2HPO4 produced the pentacyclic spiroketal ester 4 as a single diastereomer after basic workup.15 Saponification of 4 with KOH provided carboxylic acid 5, and the x-ray structure of amide 6 confirmed the structural assignment of the spiroketal portion of 5.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Steroid spiroketal α-alkoxy ester synthesis

A microwave Fmoc-SPPS protocol16 was selected for the preparation of the chimera. However, when Wang resin was used, cleavage of the peptide from the solid support by aminolysis with benzylamine13a did not provide the desired product. Alternative aminolysis protocols, including benzylamine-catalytic sodium cyanide,17 lithium aluminum benzylamide,18 and benzylamine-dimethylaluminum complex19 were also unproductive. In contrast, the preparation of chimera 13 succeded in good overall yield on FMPB-AM Rink amide resin (Scheme 3).20,21

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Solid phase synthesis of steroid-peptide chimeras

Reductive amination of aldehyde 7 with benzylamine was followed by iterative coupling of 8 under microwave conditions22 to suitably N- and side chain protected amino acid building blocks. After conjugation of tripeptide chain 11 to acid 5, the resin was cleaved under global deprotection conditions to provide the chimera sequence 13. This product was purified by RP-HPLC and submitted to a cell-based adhesion assay for high-throughput screening of regulators of the leukocyte-specific integrin CD11b/CD18, a validated therapeutic target for inflammatory diseases.23,24

In addition to 13, additional RGD encoded triple hybrid chimeras were prepared for biological evaluations as well as for exploring the scope of our synthetic strategy (Scheme 4, Table 1). Coupling steps were conducted in the microwave at 40 W for 5 min at 70 °C. The coupling with Fmoc-Asp(OtBu)-OH was repeated with 2.5 equivalents of acid to ensure complete loading. For other acids, a single acylation with 3.5 equivalents of Fmoc-amino acid was used, and 2.0 equivalents of 5 were employed in the final amide bond formation. The cleavage of the Fmoc groups with 20% piperidine in DMF also took advantage of microwave heating (50 W, 3 min, 50 °C). Products were released from the resin by treatment with a TFA cleavage cocktail at room temperature for 2 h.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Solid phase RXD-triple hybrid library synthesis

Table 1.

Structures of variable amino acid segments and steroid-spiroketal-tripeptide (R-X-D) products.

graphic file with name nihms86658f6.jpg
a

All products were synthesized analogous to the procedure shown in Scheme 3;

b

Isolated yield after RP-HPLC;

c

SPPS was conducted on 0.05 mmol resin as opposed to 0.1 mmol for all other entries.

In the design of our chimera, we hypothesized that the steroid scaffold would anchor the peptide in the membrane, the spiroketal linker would rigidly project the peptide strand and provide selectivity, and the replacement of the glycine residue in the RGD sequence would induce features such as conformational preorganization, rigidity, β-turn stabilization and resistance toward proteolytic degradation. Thus, we synthesized both L- and D-proline containing scaffolds 15 and 17. Similarly, the Fmoc-protected enantiomeric γ-amino-α,β-cyclopropyl acids 18 and 20 were used to introduce turn structures.25 β-Amino acids also have a profound effect on secondary sturctures and are finding increasing applications in peptide mimicry.26 The β-amino acids 22 and 2427 were readily inserted into the triple hybrid scaffold. Finally, for cellular localization studies, we prepared the fluorescein labeled derivative 27 by inserting the modified Fmoc-lysine residue 2628 into the R-X-D tripeptide sequence.

The biological evaluation24 of all triple hybride RGD mimics revealed no agonist activities. However, two compounds, 13 and the corresponding C-terminal NH2 amide, displayed potent antagonistic effects and IC50’s of 10.9 and 6.5 μM, respectively. These assay data validated our hypothesis and provide the basis for planned expansions of the chimera motif for integrin antagonist design.

In conclusion, we have successfully extended our oxidative enol ether rearrangement methodology toward the construction of steroidal RGD mimics. These chimeras contain structural elements from three major classes of natural products, i.e. steroids, spiroketals, and peptides. The biological studies provided evidence for potent integrin CD11b/CD18 antagonistic effects for the glycine-containing 13 and its corresponding N-debenzylated primary amide analog. Further work will mainly focus on determining selectivity and binding sites for these and related antagonists.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIGMS CMLD program (GM067082). We thank Ms. Stephanie Nicolay, Mr. David Turner, and Mr. Pete Chambers at the Pittsburgh CMLD, and Mr. Michael Hedrick and Mr. Brock T. Brown at the Burnham Center for Chemical Genomics for their valuable contributions. The x-ray structure of 6 was solved by Dr. Steven Geib (University of Pittsburgh).

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures and spectral data for all new compounds, including copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Salunke DB, Hazra BG, Pore VS. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13:813–847. doi: 10.2174/092986706776055562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Mbadugha BNA, Menger FM. Org Lett. 2003;5:4041–4044. doi: 10.1021/ol030084r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cheng Y, Ho DM, Gottlieb CR, Kahne D, Bruck MA. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:7319–7320. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Madder A, Li L, De Muynck H, Farcy N, Van Haver D, Fant F, Vanhoenacker G, Sandra P, Davis AP, De Clercq PJ. J Comb Chem. 2002;4:552–562. doi: 10.1021/cc020016g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) De Muynck H, Madder A, Farcy N, De Clercq PJ, Perez-Payan MN, Ohberg LM, Davis AP. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:145–148. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(20000103)39:1<145::aid-anie145>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Bhattarai KM, Del Amo V, Magro G, Sisson AL, Joos JB, Charmant JPH, Kantacha A, Davis AP. Chem Commun. 2006:2335–2337. doi: 10.1039/b602415g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ding B, Taotofa U, Orsak T, Chadwell M, Savage PB. Org Lett. 2004;6:3433–3436. doi: 10.1021/ol048845t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Cheng Y, Suenaga T, Still WC. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:1813–1814. [Google Scholar]; (b) Boyce R, Li G, Nestler HP, Suenaga T, Still WC. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:7955–7956. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tanaka J, Trianto A, Musman M, Issa HH, Ohtani II, Ichiba T, Higa T, Yoshida WY, Scheuer PJ. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:6259–6266.See also: Anjaneyulu ASR, Rao VL, Sastry VG. Nat Prod Res. 2003;17:149–152. doi: 10.1080/14786410310000104091.
  • 7.Lee S, Lacour TG, Lantrip D, Fuchs PL. Org Lett. 2002;4:313–316. doi: 10.1021/ol0165894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rivera DG, Pando O, Coll F. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:8327–8334. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wessjohann LA, Voigt B, Rivera DG. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44:4785–4790. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Waller DL, Stephenson CRJ, Wipf P. Org Biomol Chem. 2007;5:58–60. doi: 10.1039/b612992g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. Science. 1987;238:491–497. doi: 10.1126/science.2821619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Andronati SA, Karaseva TL, Krysko AA. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:1183–1211. doi: 10.2174/0929867043365314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cacciari B, Spalluto G. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:51–70. doi: 10.2174/0929867053363522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Carlson CB, Mowery P, Owen RM, Dykhuizen EC, Kiessling LL. ACS Chem Biol. 2007;2:119–127. doi: 10.1021/cb6003788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gentilucci L, Cardillo G, Squassabia F, Tolomelli A, Spampinato S, Sparta A, Baiula M. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:2329–2333. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Paquette LA, Andrews JFP, Vanucci C, Lawhorn DE, Negri JT, Rogers RD. J Org Chem. 1992;57:3956–3965. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Inorganic bases such as Na2CO3, NaHCO3, Cs2CO3, and NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 (1:1) gave no improvement in yield.
  • 16.Palasek SA, Cox ZJ, Collins JM. J Pept Sci. 2007;13:143–148. doi: 10.1002/psc.804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoegberg T, Stroem P, Ebner M, Raemsby S. J Org Chem. 1987;52:2033–2036. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Solladie-Cavallo A, Bencheqroun M. J Org Chem. 1992;57:5831–5834. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) Lipton MF, Basha A, Weinreb SM. Org Synth. 1980;59:49–53. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ley SV, Mynett DM, Koot WJ. Synlett. 1995:1017–1020. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The acid-labile FMPB-AM resin (Novabiochem) uses a PS-bead attached to a BAL-type linker, 4-(4-formyl-3-methoxyphenoxy) butyrylamide. Other resins, including standard Rink-amide, failed.
  • 21.(a) Alsina J, Jensen KJ, Albericio F, Barany G. Chem Eur J. 1999;5:2787–2795. [Google Scholar]; (b) Boojamra CG, Burow KM, Thompson LA, Ellman JA. J Org Chem. 1997;62:1240–1256. [Google Scholar]; (c) Yoshida M, Hayakawa I, Hayashi N, Agatsuma T, Oda Y, Tanzawa F, Iwasaki S, Koyama K, Furukawa H, Kurakata S, Sugano Y. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:3328–3332. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.05.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Boeglin D, Bonnet D, Hibert M. J Comb Chem. 2007;9:487–500. doi: 10.1021/cc060164x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.A CEM monomode microwave peptide synthesizer was used, with individual coupling times of 3–8 min per residue. For other recent applications of microwave radiation to accelerate SPPS, see: Murray JK, Gellman SH. Nature Prot. 2007;2:624–631. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.23.Bacsa B, Kappe CO. Nature Prot. 2007;2:2222–2227. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.300.Gorske BC, Jewell SA, Guerard EJ, Blackwell HE. Org Lett. 2005;7:1521–1524. doi: 10.1021/ol0502984.
  • 23.See, for example, Gentilucci L, Cardillo G, Squassabia F, Tolomelli A, Spampinato S, Sparta A, Baiula M. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:2329–2333. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.073.
  • 24.The assay was an adaptation of Park JY, Arnaout MA, Gupta V. J Biomol Screen. 2007;12:406–417. doi: 10.1177/1087057106299162.
  • 25.(a) Wipf P, Stephenson CRJ. Org Lett. 2005;7:1137–1140. doi: 10.1021/ol0501525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wipf P, Werner S, Woo GHC, Stephenson CRJ, Walczak MAA, Coleman CM, Twining LA. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:11488–11500. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wipf P, Xiao J. Org Lett. 2005;7:103–106. doi: 10.1021/ol0477529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wipf P, Xiao J, Geib SJ. Adv Synth Catal. 2005;347:1605–1613. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.(a) Cheng RP, Gellman SH, Degrado WF. Chem Rev. 2001;101:3219–3232. doi: 10.1021/cr000045i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Seebach D, Beck AK, Brenner M, Gaul C, Heckel A. Chimia. 2001;55:831–838. [Google Scholar]; (c) Lee MR, Raguse TL, Schinnerl M, Pomerantz WC, Wang X, Wipf P, Gellman SH. Org Lett. 2007;9:1801–1804. doi: 10.1021/ol070511r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.(a) Nelson SG, Spencer KL. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:1323–1325. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(20000403)39:7<1323::aid-anie1323>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang X, Nelson SG, Curran DP. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:6141–6145. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Generated in situ from fluorescein isothiocyanate and Fmoc-lysine.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES