Abstract
Background.
Preclinical studies demonstrated that non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors used for the treatment of HIV could antagonize tumor development. This led us to assess the efficacy of efavirenz in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in a multicenter phase II study.
Methods.
We used a Simon two-stage design and a 3-month prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nonprogression rate of 40% as a primary objective. Patients received 600 mg efavirenz daily with the possibility of a dose increase in case of PSA progression. Exploratory analyses included pharmacokinetics of efavirenz plasma concentrations and correlations with clinical outcomes.
Results.
Among 53 assessable patients, we observed 15 instances of PSA nonprogression at 3 months, corresponding to a nonprogression rate of 28.3% (95% confidence interval: 16.8%–42.3%). The exploratory analysis revealed that for the 7 patients in whom optimal plasma concentration of efavirenz was achieved, PSA progression was observed in only 28.6% compared with 81.8% of patients with suboptimal plasma concentrations of efavirenz.
Conclusion.
Although 600 mg efavirenz did not statistically improve the PSA nonprogression rate, our exploratory analysis suggests that higher plasma concentrations of this drug (i.e., use of increased dosages) may be of potential benefit for the treatment of mCRPC.
Abstract
摘要
背景. 临床前研究证实用于治疗 HIV 的非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂可以对抗肿瘤进展。因此我们开展了一项多中心 II 期研究以评估依非韦伦在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中的有效性。
方法. 我们使用了 Simon 两阶段设计,主要目标是 3 个月前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)无进展率达到 40%。给予患者依非韦伦 600 mg/天治疗,如发生 PSA 进展可上调剂量。探索性分析包括依非韦伦血浆浓度的药代动力学及其与临床转归的相关性。
结果. 3 个月时,我们在 53 例可评估患者中观察到15 例 PSA 无进展,相当于无进展率为 28.3%(95% 可信区间:16.8% ∼ 42.3%)。探索性分析显示,在 7 例达到依非韦伦最佳血浆浓度的患者中观察到的 PSA 进展率仅为 28.6%,而未达到依非韦伦最佳血浆浓度的患者 PSA 进展率达 81.8%。
结论. 尽管依非韦伦 600 mg未能显著改善 PSA 无进展率,我们的探索性分析提示较高的血浆药物浓度(即增加给药剂量)可能为 mCRPC 的治疗带来潜在获益。The Oncologist 2014;19:1227–1228
Author Summary
Discussion
Efavirenz is a noncompetitive inhibitor of the HIV reverse transcriptase currently prescribed for the treatment of HIV infections. Efavirenz also acts on the endogenous reverse transcriptase encoded by the retrotransposable element LINE-1. Efavirenz appears to be efficient in preventing tumor growth in mouse xenograft models [1] and has been shown to induce the expression of differentiation markers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or androgen receptor in prostate cancer PC3 cells [1]. We designed a phase II, open label trial to evaluate the efficacy of efavirenz to delay tumor progression. For this purpose, we chose a target population of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) without any clinical symptoms related to disease progression. With only 28% of patients with PSA nonprogression at 3 months, the primary endpoint was not met; however, a potential beneficial effect of efavirenz was suggested by an exploratory analysis that evaluated PSA nonprogression and new bone metastasis as functions of efavirenz plasma concentrations. In patients with plasma concentrations of efavirenz >3,000 ng/mL, corresponding to the concentration needed to obtain a cytostatic effect in vitro, we observed that the percentage that experienced PSA progression was lower than in patients with lower concentrations of efavirenz. A similar trend was observed in terms of radiological response: new bone metastasis appeared in only 14.3% of the subjects with plasma efavirenz concentrations >3,000 ng/mL and in 66.7% and 40.9% of the subjects in the groups with <1,500 ng/mL and 1,500–3,000 ng/mL, respectively (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Endpoints at 3 months. The patients with the highest plasma concentrations of efavirenz (>3,000 ng/mL) had the lowest PSA progression (>3,000 vs. <1,500: p = .0449 [two-tailed] and p = .029 [one-tailed]; >3,000 vs. 1,500–3,000: p = .0164 [two-tailed and one-tailed], Fisher's exact test) (A) and showed the lowest number of new bone metastases (>3,000 vs. <1,500: p = .0572 [two-tailed] and p = .0389 [one-tailed], Fisher's exact test) (B).
Abbreviation: PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
Before efavirenz was approved for HIV treatment, a phase I study established the safety of a 1,800-mg/day single dosage and a 1,200-mg/day repeated dosage in healthy patients [2]. These results indicate that higher dosages of efavirenz could be used in prostate cancer patients.
In conclusion, our data indicate that although the dosage of 600 mg/day of efavirenz, which is recommended for AIDS treatment, did not achieve the desired plasma concentration in our cohort of patients with prostate cancer, a higher dosage of efavirenz may offer possible benefit for the treatment of mCRPC patients. A new phase II randomized trial with a larger number of patients, a higher dosage of efavirenz, and a placebo control group is needed to assess the efficacy of efavirenz for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Access the full results at: Houede-14-345.theoncologist.com
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00964002
Sponsor(s): Bergonié Cancer Institute
Principal Investigator: Nadine Houédé
IRB Approved: Yes
For Further Reading:Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Elisabeth I. Heath, David C. Smith et al. Repurposing Itraconazole as a Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Noncomparative Randomized Phase II Trial in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. The Oncologist 2013;18:163–173.
Implications for Practice:This study investigated two doses of an oral antifungal drug, itraconazole, to determine whether it has antitumor activity in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The results showed that while low-dose itraconazole (200 mg/day) did not have significant antitumor effects, high-dose itraconazole (600 mg/day) did have some activity in these patients. Moreover, the effects of itraconazole appeared to be associated with inhibition of Hedgehog signaling in skin biopsies, and were not caused by testosterone suppression. Therefore, itraconazole may be a non-hormonal treatment option for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who wish to prevent or delay the use of chemotherapy. While itraconazole is not as effective as other novel agents for advanced prostate cancer (e.g. abiraterone, enzalutamide), it is a generic drug that may be considered if the cost of these newer agents is prohibitive, or in parts of the world where abiraterone and enzalutamide may not be available.
Author disclosures and references available online.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

