Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1981 May;67(5):990–995. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.5.990

Stomatal Conductance and Sulfur Uptake of Five Clones of Populus tremuloides Exposed to Sulfur Dioxide 1

Thomas W Kimmerer 1, T T Kozlowski 1
PMCID: PMC425815  PMID: 16661807

Abstract

Plants of five clones of Populus tremuloides Michx. were exposed to 0, 0.2 or 0.5 microliter per liter SO2 for 8 hours in controlled environment chambers. In the absence of the pollutant, two pollution-resistant clones maintained consistently lower daytime diffusive conductance (LDC) than did a highly susceptible clone or two moderately resistant clones. Differences in LDC among the latter three clones were not significant. At 0.2 microliter per liter SO2, LDC decreased in the susceptible clone after 8 hours fumigation while the LDC of the other clones was not affected. Fumigation with 0.5 microliter per liter SO2 decreased LDC of all five clones during the fumigation. Rates of recovery following fumigation varied with the clone, but the LDC of all clones had returned to control values by the beginning of the night following fumigation. Night LDC was higher in the susceptible clone than in the other clones. Fumigation for 16 hours (14 hours day + 2 hours night) with 0.4 microliter per liter SO2 decreased night LDC by half. Sulfur uptake studies generally confirmed the results of the conductance measurements. The results show that stomatal conductance is important in determining relative susceptibility of the clones to pollution stress.

Full text

PDF
990

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bressan R. A., Wilson L. G., Filner P. Mechanisms of resistance to sulfur dioxide in the Cucurbitaceae. Plant Physiol. 1978 May;61(5):761–767. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.5.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Majernik O., Mansfield T. A. Direct effect of SO2 pollution on the degree of opening of stomata. Nature. 1970 Jul 25;227(5256):377–378. doi: 10.1038/227377a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pallardy S. G., Kozlowski T. T. Stomatal response of populus clones to light intensity and vapor pressure deficit. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jul;64(1):112–114. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.1.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Roark B., Quisenberry J. E. Environmental and genetic components of stomatal behavior in two genotypes of upland cotton. Plant Physiol. 1977 Mar;59(3):354–356. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.3.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES