Abstract
Rictor is a regulatory component of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 2 (mTORC2). We have previously demonstrated that rictor expression is substantially down-regulated in terminally differentiated mast cells as compared to their immature or transformed counterparts. However, it is not known whether rictor and mTORC2 regulate mast cell activation. Here we show that mast cell degranulation induced by aggregation of high affinity receptors for IgE (FcεRI) is negatively regulated by rictor independently of mTOR. We found that inhibition of mTORC2 by the dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor Torin1 or by downregulation of mTOR by shRNA had no impact on FcεRI-induced degranulation, whereas downregulation of rictor itself resulted in an increased sensitivity (~50 fold) of cells to FcεRI aggregation with enhancement of degranulation. This was linked to a similar enhancement in calcium mobilization and cytoskeletal rearrangement attributable to increased phosphorylation of LAT and PLCγ1. In contrast, degranulation and calcium responses elicited by the G protein-coupled receptor ligand, C3a, or by thapsigargin, which induces a receptor-independent calcium signal, was unaffected by rictor knockdown. Overexpression of rictor, in contrast to knockdown, suppressed FcεRI-mediated degranulation. Taken together, these data provide evidence that rictor is a multifunctional signaling regulator which can regulate FcεRI-mediated degranulation independently of mTORC2.
Keywords: Mast Cells, IgE, FcεRI, rictor, mTORC
Introduction
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase which has diverse regulatory functions in multiple cell types (1). Two mTOR signaling complexes, mTOR complex (mTORC)1 and mTORC2, exist, each containing unique and shared partners (2). These two complexes are characterized by the association of mTOR with either raptor (mTORC1) or rictor (mTORC2) as their unique partner and by their differences in specificity towards target substrates (3, 4). Activation of mTORC1, for example, leads to the phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and p70 S6K to regulate mRNA translation (5–8), whereas activation of mTORC2 leads to the phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473) (9–12) and PKCα (3, 13).
The activities of the mTOR complexes are regulated at multiple levels primarily through stimulatory or inhibitory phosphorylations of mTOR and its binding partners within the mTOR complex (2). The catalytic activity of mTOR is dependent on its autophosphorylation of Ser2481 (14). In addition, mTOR is phosphorylated on Ser2448 in insulin-stimulated cells (15) and was presumed to regulate mTOR activity (16). Later studies demonstrated that both phosphorylations occur only when mTOR is part of the intact mTOR complex with mTOR being phosphorylated predominantly on Ser2448 in TORC1 and on Ser2481 in TORC2 (17). It is suggested that both phosphorylations could serve as markers to distinguish between mTORC1 and mTORC2. The regulation of mTORC2 via rictor is also mediated through several phosphorylation sites on rictor (18), one of which, Thr1135, is targeted by mTORC1-p70 S6K (18–20). There are reports, however, that some of the mTORC components may function independently of mTOR. This is particularly true for the mTORC2 component rictor which was shown to associate with other complexes and function independently of mTORC2 (21–26).
Our studies have demonstrated that stimulation of mast cells with KIT ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), or through antigen-mediated aggregation of IgE-occupied high affinity receptors for IgE (FcεRI) activates mTOR catalytic activity (27, 28). Mast cells are immune cells of hematopoietic origin that contribute to host defense mechanisms through receptor-mediated release of inflammatory mediators (29) as well as the inflammatory reactions associated with allergic disorders such as asthma and anaphylaxis (30, 31). The expansion of CD34+/CD117 (KIT)+ bone marrow mast cell progenitors, their subsequent maturation in tissues, and the homing of mast cells to sites of inflammation is largely regulated by SCF (32–34), whereas the activation of mast cells and ensuing degranulation and mediator release is largely a consequence of antigen/IgE-induced aggregation of FcεRI (35). Our studies revealed that mTORC1 promotes SCF-mediated mast cell migration, cytokine production and survival (27, 28), whereas mTORC2 primarily regulates mast cell expansion (28), and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated mast cell migration and chemokine production (36). Whether mTORCs regulate FcεRI-mediated responses, however, is unknown. mTOR does not appear necessary for antigen-induced degranulation, despite its activation, as neither the mTORC1 inhibitor, rapamycin (27), nor the dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor, Torin1 (37), blocked degranulation in mature human mast cells (28). Expression of mTORC components and their activities is nevertheless substantially diminished in mature non-proliferating mast cells as compared to their expanding immature or transformed counterparts (28) in which the more highly expressed mTORCs might otherwise regulate degranulation.
In this study, we examined the role of mTORC2 components on FcεRI-induced degranulation in LAD2 human mast cells in which expression and activity of mTORC2 components are elevated compared to non-proliferating human mast cells. We found that suppression of mTORC2 activity and shRNA-induced knockdown of mTOR in these cells had no significant effect on FcεRI-mediated degranulation. Surprisingly, knockdown of rictor markedly enhanced the sensitivity of cells to FcεRI aggregation with respect to degranulation without significantly affecting mTORC2 catalytic activity as monitored by the phosphorylation of the mTORC2 downstream substrates, Akt(Ser473) and 4E-BP1(Thr37/46). Rictor knockdown appeared instead to increase FcεRI-mediated signaling including LAT and PLCγ1 phosphorylation, resulting in enhanced calcium signaling and filamentous (F)-actin rearrangement. These data and the effects of rictor overexpression revealed a novel mode of action of rictor within mast cells in that it may regulate specific cellular functions independently of its regulation of mTOR activity.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
The LAD2 human mast cell line (38), was maintained in StemPro-34 SMF with supplement (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and recombinant human SCF (100 ng/ml, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ).
Antibodies and reagents
Human myeloma IgE (huIgE, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was biotinylated in the NIAID Core Facility. The protein-specific antibodies used in confocal microscopy were: mTOR (10343, IBL, Minneapolis, MN) and rictor (NB100-612, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO). The β-actin-specific antibody for immunoblotting was from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverley, MA) and Lyn-specific antibody for immunoblotting from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The conjugated protein-specific antibodies were: fluorophore-conjugated antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit IgG (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), and mouse IgG Fc-specific antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The phosphoprotein-specific antibodies for immunoblotting were: p-mTOR(Ser2448), p-mTOR(Ser2481), p-rictor (Thr1135), p-Akt(Thr308), p-Akt(Ser473), p-LAT(Tyr171), p-S6 ribosomal protein (S6RP) (Ser240/244), p-4E-BP1(Thr37/46), and rictor (Cell Signaling Technology), and p-PLCγ1(Tyr783) (Invitrogen). The blocking donkey serum was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology and Torin1 (37) was a gift of Dr. Nathanael S. Gray, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. FITC-conjugated phalloidin and other chemicals and reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich.
shRNA knockdown
The MISSION® shRNA system (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to knock down the specific proteins in the studied cells. The following TRC1-pLKO-puro vectors were used: two targeting sequences for mTOR, designated as mT1 (CCGGCCGCTAGTAGGGAGGTTTATTCTCGAGAATAAACCTCCCTACTAGCGGTTTTTG, TRCN0000038674) and mT2 (CCGGGCCAGAATCTATTCATTCTTTCTCGAGAAAGAATGAATAGATTCTGGCTTTTTG, TRCN0000038677); and two targeting sequences for rictor, designated as Rict1 (CCGGCGTCGGAGTAACCAAAGATTACTCGAGTAATCTTTGGTTACTCCGACGTTTTTG; TRCN0000074291) and Rict2 (CCGGCGGAGGTTCATACAAGAATTACTCGAGTAATTCTTGTATGAACCTCCGTTTTTG; TRCN0000074289). The TRC1-pLKO-puro vectors with non-target sequence, (CCGGCAACAAGATGAAGAGCACCAACTCGAGTTGGTGCTCTTCATCTTGTTGTTTTT; SHC002), and with luciferase targeting sequence (CCGGCGCTGAGTACTTCGAAATGTCCTCGAGGACATTTCGAAGTACTCAGCGTTTTT; SHC007) were used as negative controls. The virus for cell transduction was prepared using MISSION® Lentiviral Packaging Mix (SHC0001, Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The first harvest of the virus was filtered (0.45 μm pore size) then frozen and stored at −80 °C. Prior to transduction, the virus was thawed and diluted (1:20–1:50) with the cell suspension of the targeted cells and cells cultured for 48 h. Studies were conducted on the cells following a subsequent 48–72 h positive selection (puromycin; 1 μg/ml).
Overexpression of rictor
LAD2 cells were transfected with human myc-tagged rictor in a pRK5 plasmid kindly supplied by Dr. D. D. Sarbassov (39) as described (40). Briefly, 2 × 106 LAD2 cells were transfected using the Amaxa Nucleofector II system and then plated out in StemPro-34 medium supplemented with SCF and 100 ng/ml biotinylated human IgE for 6 h. This time point was chosen to achieve near maximal expression of rictor without discernible effects on cell morphology or viability. The extent of overexpression was 25% and typical results are described and shown in the Supplemental Figure 1. After transfection, degranulation and activation studies were performed as described below.
Cell activation and degranulation
LAD2 cells were sensitized with biotinylated huIgE (100 ng/ml) overnight. The cells were then harvested and processed as described (41) using streptavidin (SA) to activate the cells via aggregation of biotin-huIgE-bound FcεRI, C3a to activate the cells via the C3R GPCR (42), or thapsigargin to activate the cells in a receptor-independent, calcium-dependent manner (43, 44). Following stimulation of the cells for 30 min, degranulation was determined as a percentage of total (cellular and released) β-hexosaminidase that was released into the medium (45).
Calcium measurement, immunoblotting, and F-actin analysis by flow cytometry
To monitor the calcium response in activated cells, sensitized cells were loaded with Fura-2 AM to monitor changes in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations as described (46). Immunoblotting was performed on lysates of activated cells according to previous protocols (41). For densitometric analysis, the chemiluminescence from immunoblots was acquired on Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS+ System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Images acquired within a linear range of saturation were then analyzed using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). For studies of rictor overexpression specifically, the Li-Cor Odyssey CLx system was used for immunoblot analysis. Phospho-proteins (rabbit Abs) were measured using goat anti-rabbit 800CW secondary Ab (Li-Cor), in the green channel and β-actin loading control (mouse Ab) was measured using goat anti-mouse 680RD secondary Ab (Li-Cor) in the red channel. A correction factor for loading was applied to the fluorescence intensity of the phosphorylation bands to produce corrected phosphorylation intensity.
To determine changes in the content of F-actin, the activated cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X100 and stained with 1 μg/ml phalloidin-FITC as described (47). The stained cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry on FACSCalibur with CellQuest 3.3 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The acquired data were analyzed using FlowJo 7.6 software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR).
Confocal microscopy
Following addition of stimulants as indicated, cell activation was stopped and the cells were further treated as described (47) using mTOR- and rictor-specific antibodies of, respectively, mouse and rabbit origin in conjunction with donkey Cy3-labeled mouse and AlexaFluor488-labeled rabbit IgG-specific antibodies. Initial investigation revealed that knockdown of rictor by 40–50% resulted in a 25% decrease in cellular fluorescence. The mTOR antibody (from IBL) used here was the only one tested that gave a sufficient fluorescent signal for confocal microscopy of LAD2 cells. The confocal images were acquired on a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, PA) with 63× oil immersion objective and numerical aperture 1.4. The Huygens Essential software (Scientific Volume Imaging BV, Hilversum, The Netherlands) -deconvoluted images were processed using Imaris software (Bitplane AG, Zurich, Switzerland).
Statistics
The statistical significance was computed from the number (n) of values indicated. The statistical significance between the control and the test sets of values was determined using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. P<0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Localization of mTOR and rictor in LAD2 human mast cells
The presence of rictor in the mTORC2 complex is critical for the ability of mTOR to phosphorylate its substrates. We therefore examined the relative cellular distribution of rictor and mTOR in LAD2 human mast cells prior to, and following, FcεRI aggregation induced by cross-linking of receptor-bound biotinylated huIgE with SA. Under resting conditions, both mTOR and rictor were localized in punctate-like regions largely within the cytosol, neither appeared to be associated with the plasma membrane (Figure 1A). However, simultaneous antibody staining of both molecules revealed that these molecules are only partially co-localized in resting cells (Figure 1B, 1C). Following FcεRI aggregation for 2 minutes under optimal conditions for degranulation (48), there was only a small redistribution and increase in the association of rictor with mTOR (Figure 1B, 1C). These data thus indicate that, as reported in a limited number of other cell types (49), rictor exists in two pools in LAD2 cells; one associated with mTOR presumably as part of the mTORC2 complex, and the other localized in cellular compartments independently of mTOR. This suggested therefore that rictor would have the potential to regulate cellular process, not only in the context of mTORC2 activation, but also independently of mTOR activity. Two approaches were adopted to explore these possibilities: inhibition of mTOR activity by the dual mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitor Torin1 (28, 37) and shRNA-induced knockdown of mTOR and rictor.
Figure 1.
Localization of mTOR and rictor in resting and FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. (A)Sensitized (biotin-huIgE) cells were stained with mouse-origin mTOR- or rabbit-origin rictor-specific antibodies. The bound antibodies were visualized with a mix of donkey-origin Cy3-labeled mouse and AlexaFluor488-labeled rabbit IgG-specific antibodies and the nuclei stained with DAPI. (B) Sensitized cells were activated with SA (100 ng/ml) for 2 min. The cells were then simultaneously stained with mouse origin mTOR- and rabbit origin rictor-specific antibodies. The bound antibodies and nuclei were visualized as in A. (C) The correlation of mTOR and rictor in deconvolved images of the resting (non-activated) and activated cells in B was calculated. In (A, B), typical deconvolved images from 4 independent experiments are shown and a scale bar represents 5 μm. In C, data show mean, SEM and statistical significance (n=4, *P<0.05, Student’s t-test) from 4 independent experiments in each of which 4–6 cells were analyzed.
FcεRI-mediated degranulation is independent of mTOR activity
To explore the role of rictor in the context of regulation of mTORC2 function in LAD2 cells, we initially examined whether mTOR and rictor are activated by measuring the extent of phosphorylation of mTOR(Ser2481 and 2448), and rictor(Thr1135) following FcεRI aggregation. As shown in Figure 2, FcεRI aggregation induced by cross-linking of receptor-bound biotinylated huIgE with SA, increased phosphorylation of mTOR and to a greater extent rictor. These phosphorylations reached a maximum at 10 min and then declined. We next determined whether mTORC2 activation regulated degranulation by examining the outcome of its inhibition with Torin1. As shown in Figure 3A, Torin1 had little, if any, effect on degranulation in SA-stimulated LAD2 cells at a concentration (200 nM) that maximally inhibits activating phosphorylations of mTOR and downstream substrates in CD34+-derived human mast cells (see supplementary data ref. 28). This result was also in accord with our previous studies (28) where mTORC2 activity was increased following FcεRI aggregation but was not required for degranulation as the latter was not inhibited by Torin1. As further verification, we knocked-down expression of mTOR in LAD2 cells. For these studies, we utilized two control shRNA vectors and four shRNA constructs; two that targeted mTOR and another two rictor. As shown in Figure 3B–C, the control vectors minimally impaired mTOR expression although in all these knockdown experiments, one of the control vectors (non-target2 in Figure 3C) elevated the expression of rictor. Nevertheless, one of the mTOR-targeted shRNAs (i.e., mT2 in Figure 3C) reduced mTOR expression by ~50% in these cells without significantly affecting rictor or FcεRI expression as indicated by IgE bound to the cell surface (Figure 3D). Despite the partial knockdown of mTOR with mT2 shRNA degranulation was not significantly different from that induced in the control vector-(non-target1 and 2) or mT1-treated cells (Figure 3E). However, consistent with experiments to be described later, the non-target2 transduced cells with the highest rictor levels (as shown in Figure 3C) exhibited significantly reduced degranulation compared to non-target1 transfected cells and control non-transfected cells with lower rictor levels. This pattern was consistent in all individual experiments. Overall, these data further support the conclusion that mTOR activity, and presumably rictor in the context of mTORC2, had little or minimal role in the regulation of FcεRI-mediated mast cell degranulation.
Figure 2.
MTORC stimulation in FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. (A) Sensitized cells were activated with SA (100 ng/ml) for time periods indicated. The cells were lysed and the indicated phosphoproteins analyzed by immunoblotting. Lyn content was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometric data from (A) were normalized. In (A), typical immunoblots from 3 independent experiments are shown. In (B), the data represent mean and SEM and statistical significance between activated and non-activated samples for 3 independent experiments is indicated (n=3, *P<0.05, Student’s t-test).
Figure 3.
Role of mTOR in degranulation of FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. (A) Sensitized cells were pre-treated with Torin1 (200 nM) or vehicle alone (Ctrl) for 30 min. The cells were then activated with SA (0–1000 ng/ml) for 30 min and degranulation determined. (B) LAD2 cells were, or not (Ctrl), transduced with two non-targeting (Non-target1 and Non-target2) and two mTOR-targeting (mT1 and mT2) shRNA plasmids and expression of mTOR and rictor was determined by immunoblotting. β-actin content was used as a loading control. (C) Normalized densitometric data from all immunoblots are shown. (D and E) The transduced cells in (B, C) were sensitized overnight with biotin-huIgE and evaluated for biotin-huIgE binding by flow cytometry (D) or activated with SA (0–1000 ng/ml) for 30 min to measure degranulation (E). (B) Typical immunoblots from 3 independent transductions are shown. (A, C) The data show mean and SEM from 3 independent transductions and statistical significance between non-transduced and transduced cells is indicated (n=3, *P<0.05, Student’s t-test). In panel E, bars for SEM are shown except where they fall within the data points. Significant reductions were observed for non-target2 compared to non-target1 and controls (P<0.01) and for mT1, and mT2 transduced cells compared to non-target1 and controls (P<0.05) at 100 and 1,000 ng/ml SA (not shown).
Rictor knockdown increases sensitivity to FcεRI aggregation with respect to degranulation
We next used the shRNA constructs to knockdown rictor specifically to see if it regulated degranulation independently of mTORC2 in LAD2 cells. As shown in Figure 4A and B, this strategy significantly down-regulated expression of rictor with minimal change in the expression of mTOR, FcεRI (as assessed by IgE binding in Figure 4C), and other proteins (see later). However, rictor knockdown resulted in a marked (~50 fold) increase in sensitivity of the LAD2 cells to SA with respect to degranulation as indicated by the leftward shift in the concentration-response curve (Fig. 4D). This shift was in contrast to the relatively small differences noted for degranulation with knockdown of mTOR in Figure 3E.
Figure 4.
Role of rictor in degranulation of FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. (A and B) LAD2 cells were, or not (Ctrl), transduced with the non-targeting or rictor-targeting shRNA plasmids as described in Figure 3. Expression of mTOR and rictor was determined by immunoblotting. β-actin content was used as a loading control. Typical immunoblots are shown in (A) and normalized densitometric data for all immunoblots in (B). The transduced cells were sensitized for measurement of biotin-huIgE binding (C) and degranulation following activation with SA (0–1000 ng/ml) as described for Figure 3 (D). (E) The transduced sensitized cells were also activated with C3a (0–2000 ng/ml) or thapsigargin (0–1 nM) for 30 min and degranulation was determined. In (B–E), the data show mean and SEM (except where bars fall within data points) from 3 independent transductions and statistical significance between non-transduced and transduced cells is indicated (n=3, *P<0.05, Student’s t-test).
To examine whether the enhanced sensitivity was specific for FcεRI-mediated signaling, degranulation was examined following challenge with C3a which activates mast cells via the GPCR, C3R, and thapsigargin which induces receptor-independent calcium-dependent degranulation. As shown in Figure 4E, there were no differences in the responses between control shRNA-, and rictor-specific shRNA-treated cells to either stimulant, thus revealing that the regulation of degranulation by rictor was restricted to FcεRI-mediated stimulation.
Increased sensitivity to FcεRI aggregation is associated with enhanced calcium signaling
To identify signaling events that are responsible for the increased sensitivity to FcεRI-mediated stimulation, we next examined the increase in cytosolic calcium, a critical signaling event for mast cell degranulation (50). As shown in Figure 5A, when mast cells were stimulated with a concentration of SA that induced maximal degranulation there was a small, although statistically significant, increase in the calcium response in rictor knockdown cells as compared to control cells. However, with lower concentrations of SA, the calcium response in control cells was diminished accordingly, whereas the response in the rictor knockdown cells still remained high with an even greater difference from that of control cells. This difference was most apparent with concentrations of SA (1 ng/ml) that induced minimal calcium response in the control cells (Figure 5A, right hand panel). In contrast, when the cells were stimulated with C3a, the calcium response in rictor knockdown and control cells were comparable (Figure 5B). These data thus show that the calcium response in SA-activated cells is negatively regulated by rictor. However, as with degranulation, rictor does not influence the calcium response elicited by the GPCR agonist, C3a.
Figure 5.
Role of rictor in the calcium response in FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. LAD2 cells were transduced, or not (Ctrl), with non-targeting or rictor-targeting shRNA plasmids and sensitized overnight with biotin-huIgE as in previous figures. The sensitized cells were loaded with Fura-2 AM, stimulated with SA (100, 10 and 1 ng/ml) (A) or with C3a (2000, 500, 100 ng/ml) (B), and the calcium responses determined. The data show mean and SEM from 3 independent transductions. The differences between rictor- and vector- transduced cells were statistically significant at almost all time points shown in panel A (P<0.05 to <0.001, Student’s t-test).
Rictor negatively regulates F-actin reorganization following FcεRI aggregation
The calcium signal in activated mast cells initiates necessary events for degranulation (50, 51). Among these, the reorganization of F-actin plays a key role in the process of granule extrusion and passage through the juxta-membrane F-actin barrier (47, 52–55). We therefore selected one control and one rictor-targeting vector to determine if rictor knock down affected F-actin reorganization. As shown in Figure 6A, stimulation with a suboptimal concentration of SA (10 ng/ml) induced a rapid and comparable elevation of F-actin levels in both the control and the rictor knockdown cells. However, in the control cells the F-actin levels rapidly returned to those observed prior to activation whereas the rictor knockdown cells maintained elevated F-actin levels for up to 30 min. When cells were stimulated with a concentration of SA that induced no degranulation in control cells but still substantial degranulation in rictor knockdown cells (Figure 4D), only the rictor knockdown cells displayed enhanced F-actin levels (Figure 6A, right hand panel). In contrast, stimulation via GPCR using C3a revealed no difference in the elevation of F-actin between the rictor knockdown and control cells (Figure 6B). These data are consistent with the conclusion that rictor also functions as a negative regulator of F-actin reorganization as is the case for the calcium response.
Figure 6.
Role of rictor in F-actin de-polymerization/re-polymerization in FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. (A) LAD2 cells were transduced with non-targeting (Non-target1; Non-target) or rictor-targeting (Rict1; Rictor KD) shRNA plasmids and sensitized. After activation with SA (10 and 1 ng/ml) for time periods indicated, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and F-actin content was analyzed after staining with FITC-phalloidin by flow cytometry. (B) Changes in F-actin were similarly determined in C3a-stimulated (500 ng/ml) cells. Values for staining intensity were normalized and show mean and SEM from 3 independent transductions and statistical significance between non-transduced and transduced cells at each time point is indicated (n=3, *P<0.05, Student’s t-test).
Rictor negatively impacts early FcεRI-induced signaling events
We next focused on the mechanisms through which rictor may act on upstream signaling events regulating the calcium response and downstream F-actin remodeling as well as degranulation. The FcεRI-mediated calcium signal is produced via phosphorylation of LAT which enables recruitment, phosphorylation and activation of PLCγ1. The ensuing release of intracellular calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum following production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate by PLCγ1 is coupled to influx of intracellular calcium and activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (56). Accordingly, we analyzed these biochemical events in the control and rictor knockdown cells stimulated by SA at a low concentration (1 ng/ml) that produced no or minimal calcium signal, degranulation and alteration of F-actin levels in control cells but substantial responses in rictor knockdown cells (Figure 4D, 5A, and 6A). As shown in Figure 7A and 7B, the extent of phosphorylation of both LAT and PLCγ1 was considerably greater in the rictor knock-down cells than control cells under these conditions. A similar and significant enhancement was also noted in the phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308), a surrogate marker of PI3K activity (57), in rictor knockdown cells.
Figure 7.
Role of rictor in regulation of early signaling events induced in FcεRI-activated LAD2 cells. LAD2 cells were transduced with the Non-target1 (Non-target) and Rict1 (Rictor KD) shRNA plasmids and sensitized overnight. Cells were then activated with SA (1 ng/ml) for the time periods indicated for immunoblotting. (A) Typical immunoblot and (B) densitometric data (mean and SEM) normalized to Non-target1 cells at maximal response (=100) from 4 independent experiments are shown. Statistical significance between Non-target and Rictor KD cells is indicated (*P<0.05, Student’s t-test).
Although rictor deficiency clearly enhanced early FcεRI-induced signaling events, the effects on mTORC-mediated events following SA stimulation were less clear. A temporary suppression was observed following SA stimulation in the phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473) a substrate of mTORC2 (9), 4E-BP1(Thr37/46) a substrate of mTORC1(28, 37), and of S6RP(Ser240/244) (58) a substrate for mTORC1-regulated p70 S6 kinase (59) (Fig. 7B). However, phosphorylation of S6RP(Ser240/244) remained substantially higher in rictor knockdown cells than in control transfected cells at all time points which might reflect, in part, the reciprocal activities of the mTORCs in regulating cell activities. Nevertheless, these results overall imply that at low levels of FcεRI-mediated activation events may be linked to temporary inhibition of mTORC activity and cell protein synthesis (60) and that rictor may inhibit phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308) independently of its link to mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473).
To verify that rictor negatively regulated mast cell activation, the effects of overexpression of rictor were examined in LAD2 cells. We were able to achieve overexpression of rictor (~ 25%), and although modest, this increase in rictor levels resulted in significantly reduced degranulation at 100 ng/ml SA. This trend was apparent, but not significant, at lower concentrations of SA (Supplemental Fig. 1A). As for rictor knockdown, degranulation in response to thapsigargin was unaffected (Supplemental Fig. 1B) to suggest again that the inhibitory effect of rictor was related to FcεRI-mediated signaling rather than the mechanics of exocytosis. The increase in rictor levels was also associated with diminished SA-induced phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308) while phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473) was unchanged (Supplemental Fig. 1C and D) as was true for rictor knockdown. Therefore, the data further support the conclusions that rictor inhibits FcεRI-mediated degranulation and that the inhibitory action of rictor on PI3K/PDK1-dependent phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308) occurs independently of TORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473).
Discussion
In this study, we have demonstrated that rictor can function as a negative regulator of signaling events responsible for FcεRI-mediated mast cell degranulation independently of mTOR and by implication mTORC2. Although our studies reveal a complex and unclear inter-relationship between mTORC1 and mTORC2 that warrants further examination, the focus of this study is the role of rictor in FcεRI-mediated activation of mast cells. Rictor was originally described as an integral component of mTORC2, a complex that comprises mTOR and several other binding partners (61). The signaling function of this complex is directly linked to the kinase activity of mTOR as demonstrated by recently developed highly specific inhibitors of mTOR (62). We have previously shown that inhibition of mTORC2 catalytic activity by a dual mTORC1/mTORC2 kinase inhibitor Torin1 (37), inhibits proliferation of developing and neoplastic mast cells (28). However, because this inhibitor failed to block FcεRI-induced mast cell degranulation we concluded that mTORC2 catalytic activity was not required for this response (28). This conclusion is further supported by our current observation that, in addition to Torin1, shRNA-mediated downregulation of mTOR had no effect on degranulation in FcεRI-activated LAD2 human mast cells.
Previously, we had noted that, at various stages of development of mast cells from CD34+ progenitors, the ratio between mTOR and rictor varied (28). This variable stoichiometry suggested that these mTORC components may function, not only in the context of mTORC2, but also independently of each other. Our confocal examination of mast cells demonstrate that rictor is localized in at least two discernible pools regardless of the activation status of the cells: one co-localized with mTOR and the other not. Using rictor-specific shRNA we further demonstrated that downregulation (~70 %) of rictor in LAD2 mast cells had no effect on mTORC2 catalytic activity in FcεRI-stimulated cells as there was no impairment of the phosphorylation of mTORC2 substrate Akt(Ser473) (9) and the mTORC1/mTORC2 downstream signaling target 4E-BP1(Thr37/46) (7, 28, 37). These data might be indicative of insufficient knockdown of rictor to affect mTORC2 activity but are in contrast to findings in other systems where rictor downregulation was usually associated with loss of mTORC2 activity (9, 63). Nevertheless, our data are consistent with reports of rictor forming complexes with other proteins or functioning independently of mTORC2 (21–25).
The marked increase in sensitivity of LAD2 human mast cells after rictor knockdown to SA, which leads to enhanced degranulation without alteration in mTORC2 signaling, also supports our conclusion that rictor can function independently of mTOR complexes. This increase in sensitivity was associated with corresponding changes in critical FcεRI-mediated signaling events such as the generation of the calcium signal and resulting F-actin rearrangement. In fact, these signals and degranulation were apparent in the rictor knockdown cells at concentrations of SA that failed to stimulate degranulation and were minimally effective in eliciting a calcium signal or actin remodeling in control cells. Consistent with the above results, overexpression of rictor diminished degranulation and PI3K-dependent phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308) without affecting mTORC2 signaling via phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473).
The resistance of C3a and thapsigargin stimulation to rictor knockdown or overexpression indicated that the negative effects of rictor were restricted to FcεRI-specific signaling events. These include the phosphorylation of LAT and PLCγ1 that precede calcium mobilization and the activation of PI3K activity, as indicated by increased phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308), which helps maintain early FcεRI-mediated signaling. LAT is a plasma membrane adaptor protein which, by virtue of phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues and subsequent recruitment and assembly of key signaling molecules including PLCγ (64), is the nexus for signal propagation for FcεRI (65) and other receptors including TCR (66), and pre-BCR (67). Whether rictor negatively regulates LAT signal propagation from these other receptors or is restricted to FcεRI-mediated activation specifically in mast cell function is unknown and needs further investigation.
In contrast to the comparable enhancements in FcεRI-mediated phosphorylation of Akt(Thr308), LAT and PLCγ1 after rictor knockdown, the increased constitutive phosphorylation of S6RP(Ser240/244) in resting rictor knockdown cells and its dephosphorylation during SA stimulation are paradoxical. The S6RP is a well known substrate of p70 S6K (58), a recognized downstream signaling target of mTORC1 (59, 68) and a kinase that targets rictor (Thr1135) (20) independently of mTORC2 (69). The p70 S6 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of rictor (Thr1135) has been reported to be (19) or not to be (20) a negative regulator of mTORC2-mediated phosphorylation of Akt(Ser473). Although the precise reason for the upregulation of phosphorylation of S6RP in the rictor knockdown LAD2 cells remains unclear, it may reflect competition between rictor and raptor for a finite pool of mTOR for the formation of mTOR complexes into functional units. Regardless, our data show that, with a specific type of activation such as FcεRI-stimulation in LAD2 mast cells, rictor can act independently of mTORC2 and contribute to the regulation of the activation pathway that is controlled by PI3K/mTORC1 signaling (56).
As noted earlier, rictor levels are significantly elevated at the early stages of mast cell development and that, upon maturation, these levels gradually decline to a minimal level in terminally differentiated non-dividing mast cells (28). Furthermore, the proliferation capacity of developing and neoplastic mast cells correlates with and is controlled by rictor expression (28). Here, we report that, in addition to cell proliferation, rictor may also temper the sensitivity of mast cells to FcεRI stimulation, especially at low levels of stimulation, to prevent inappropriate activation of the developing mast cells during the maturation phase. Such control of the sensitivity of mast cells to FcεRI-mediated signals is particularly important upon migration of mast cells to tissues where terminal mast cell differentiation takes place. The diminution in expression of rictor in mature cells may then allow a more responsive phenotype to antigen stimulation. Collectively, these findings indicate that rictor expression may be an important player in the regulation of mast cell numbers, their distribution, and their activation phenotype in vivo, and that abnormal rictor expression or function could result in dysfunctional mast cell proliferation and activation in disorders of mast cell proliferation, anaphylaxis, and atopy.
In summary, our data demonstrate for the first time that rictor participates in the regulation of the FcεRI-mediated cell activation independently of mTORC2. This regulation is executed at the early stages of FcεRI signaling to negatively regulate critical signaling events such as calcium mobilization and cytoskeletal rearrangement. Studies with C3a and thapsigargin suggest that the actions of rictor might be specific for FcεRI-mediated activation in mast cells. This specificity points to rictor as being a novel therapeutic target to control the responsiveness of the mast cells in allergic disease.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Nathanael S. Gray and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School for providing Torin1. We would like to thank the clinical research staff for their assistance and the Biological Imaging Facility (RTB/NIAID/NIH) for technical assistance in confocal image production including Juraj Kabat for assistance in image post processing and analysis.
Financial support
Research in the authors’ laboratories was supported by funding from the Division of Intramural Research programs within NIAID (D.S., G.C, A.K., D.D.M. and A.M.G.) and NHLBI (M.A.B).
Abbreviations
- mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
- mTORC
mTOR complex
- SCF
stem cell factor
- FcεRI
high affinity IgE receptor
- GPCR
G protein-coupled receptor
- F-actin
filamentous-actin
- huIgE
human myeloma IgE
- S6RP
S6 ribosomal protein
- SA
streptavidin
Footnotes
Conflict of interests
The authors have no financial or commercial conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Weber JD, Gutmann DH. Deconvoluting mTOR biology. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:236–248. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.2.19022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Foster KG, Fingar DC. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): conducting the cellular signaling symphony. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:14071–14077. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.094003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Kim DH, Guertin DA, Latek RR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sabatini DM. Rictor, a novel binding partner of mTOR, defines a rapamycin-insensitive and raptor-independent pathway that regulates the cytoskeleton. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1296–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim DH, Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, King JE, Latek RR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sabatini DM. mTOR interacts with raptor to form a nutrient-sensitive complex that signals to the cell growth machinery. Cell. 2002;110:163–175. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00808-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brunn GJ, Hudson CC, Sekulić A, Williams JM, Hosoi H, Houghton PJ, Lawrence JC, Jr, Abraham RT. Phosphorylation of the translational repressor PHAS-I by the mammalian target of rapamycin. Science. 1997;277:99–101. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Burnett PE, Barrow RK, Cohen NA, Snyder SH, Sabatini DM. RAFT1 phosphorylation of the translational regulators p70 S6 kinase and 4E-BP1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1432–1437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hara K, Yonezawa K, Kozlowski MT, Sugimoto T, Andrabi K, Weng QP, Kasuga M, Nishimoto I, Avruch J. Regulation of eIF-4E BP1 phosphorylation by mTOR. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:26457–26463. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.42.26457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Isotani S, Hara K, Tokunaga C, Inoue H, Avruch J, Yonezawa K. Immunopurified mammalian target of rapamycin phosphorylates and activates p70 S6 kinase α in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:34493–34498. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science. 2005;307:1098–1101. doi: 10.1126/science.1106148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guertin DA, Stevens DM, Thoreen CC, Burds AA, Kalaany NY, Moffat J, Brown M, Fitzgerald KJ, Sabatini DM. Ablation in mice of the mTORC components raptor, rictor, or mLST8 reveals that mTORC2 is required for signaling to Akt-FOXO and PKCα, but not S6K1. Dev Cell. 2006;11:859–871. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jacinto E, Facchinetti V, Liu D, Soto N, Wei S, Jung SY, Huang Q, Qin J, Su B. SIN1/MIP1 maintains rictor-mTOR complex integrity and regulates Akt phosphorylation and substrate specificity. Cell. 2006;127:125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shiota C, Woo JT, Lindner J, Shelton KD, Magnuson MA. Multiallelic disruption of the rictor gene in mice reveals that mTOR complex 2 is essential for fetal growth and viability. Dev Cell. 2006;11:583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Masri J, Bernath A, Martin J, Jo OD, Vartanian R, Funk A, Gera J. mTORC2 activity is elevated in gliomas and promotes growth and cell motility via overexpression of rictor. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11712–11720. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peterson RT, Beal PA, Comb MJ, Schreiber SL. FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein (FRAP) autophosphorylates at serine 2481 under translationally repressive conditions. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:7416–7423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reynolds THt, Bodine SC, Lawrence JC., Jr Control of Ser2448 phosphorylation in the mammalian target of rapamycin by insulin and skeletal muscle load. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:17657–17662. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201142200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sekulić A, Hudson CC, Homme JL, Yin P, Otterness DM, Karnitz LM, Abraham RT. A direct linkage between the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT signaling pathway and the mammalian target of rapamycin in mitogen-stimulated and transformed cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3504–3513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Copp J, Manning G, Hunter T. TORC-specific phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): phospho-Ser2481 is a marker for intact mTOR signaling complex 2. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1821–1827. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dibble CC, Asara JM, Manning BD. Characterization of rictor phosphorylation sites reveals direct regulation of mTOR complex 2 by S6K1. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:5657–5670. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00735-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Julien LA, Carriere A, Moreau J, Roux PP. mTORC1-activated S6K1 phosphorylates Rictor on threonine 1135 and regulates mTORC2 signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:908–921. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00601-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Treins C, Warne PH, Magnuson MA, Pende M, Downward J. Rictor is a novel target of p70 S6 kinase-1. Oncogene. 2010;29:1003–1016. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao D, Wan L, Inuzuka H, Berg AH, Tseng A, Zhai B, Shaik S, Bennett E, Tron AE, Gasser JA, Lau A, Gygi SP, Harper JW, DeCaprio JA, Toker A, Wei W. Rictor forms a complex with Cullin-1 to promote SGK1 ubiquitination and destruction. Mol Cell. 2010;39:797–808. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hagan GN, Lin Y, Magnuson MA, Avruch J, Czech MP. A Rictor-Myo1c complex participates in dynamic cortical actin events in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:4215–4226. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00867-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Agarwal NK, Chen CH, Cho H, Boulbes DR, Spooner E, Sarbassov DD. Rictor regulates cell migration by suppressing RhoGDI2. Oncogene. 2013;32:2521–2526. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guo Z, Zhou Y, Evers BM, Wang Q. Rictor regulates FBXW7-dependent c-Myc and cyclin E degradation in colorectal cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2012;418:426–432. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McDonald PC, Oloumi A, Mills J, Dobreva I, Maidan M, Gray V, Wederell ED, Bally MB, Foster LJ, Dedhar S. Rictor and integrin-linked kinase interact and regulate Akt phosphorylation and cancer cell survival. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1618–1624. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.He Y, Li D, Cook SL, Yoon MS, Kapoor A, Rao CV, Kenis PJ, Chen J, Wang F. Mammalian target of rapamycin and Rictor control neutrophil chemotaxis by regulating Rac/Cdc42 activity and the actin cytoskeleton. Molecular biology of the cell. 2013;24:3369–3380. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-07-0405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim MS, Kuehn HS, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. Activation and function of the mTORC1 pathway in mast cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:4586–4595. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smrž D, Kim MS, Zhang S, Mock BA, Smržová Š, DuBois W, Simakova O, Maric I, Wilson TM, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. mTORC1 and mTORC2 differentially regulate homeostasis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic human mast cells. Blood. 2011;118:6803–6813. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-359984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Galli SJ, Tsai M. Mast cells in allergy and infection: versatile effector and regulatory cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:1843–1851. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mekori YA, Metcalfe DD. Mast cells in innate immunity. Immunol Rev. 2000;173:131–140. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2000.917305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brown JM, Wilson TM, Metcalfe DD. The mast cell and allergic diseases: role in pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38:4–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirshenbaum AS, Goff JP, Semere T, Foster B, Scott LM, Metcalfe DD. Demonstration that human mast cells arise from a progenitor cell population that is CD34+, c-kit+, and expresses aminopeptidase N (CD13) Blood. 1999;94:2333–2342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Metcalfe DD, Baram D, Mekori YA. Mast cells. Physiol Rev. 1997;77:1033–1079. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.4.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Okayama Y, Kawakami T. Development, migration, and survival of mast cells. Immunol Res. 2006;34:97–115. doi: 10.1385/IR:34:2:97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kraft S, Kinet JP. New developments in FcεRI regulation, function and inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:365–378. doi: 10.1038/nri2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kuehn HS, Jung MY, Beaven MA, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. Prostaglandin E2 activates and utilizes mTORC2 as a central signaling locus for the regulation of mast cell chemotaxis and mediator release. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:391–402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.164772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thoreen CC, Kang SA, Chang JW, Liu Q, Zhang J, Gao Y, Reichling LJ, Sim T, Sabatini DM, Gray NS. An ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reveals rapamycin-resistant functions of mTORC1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:8023–8032. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900301200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kirshenbaum AS, Akin C, Wu Y, Rottem M, Goff JP, Beaven MA, Rao VK, Metcalfe DD. Characterization of novel stem cell factor responsive human mast cell lines LAD 1 and 2 established from a patient with mast cell sarcoma/leukemia; activation following aggregation of FcεRI or FcγRI. Leuk Res. 2003;27:677–682. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(02)00343-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aimbetov R, Chen CH, Bulgakova O, Abetov D, Bissenbaev AK, Bersimbaev RI, Sarbassov DD. Integrity of mTORC2 is dependent on the rictor Gly-934 site. Oncogene. 2012;31:2115–2120. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cruse G, Beaven MA, Ashmole I, Bradding P, Gilfillan AM, Metcalfe DD. A truncated splice-variant of the FcεRIβ receptor subunit is critical for microtubule formation and degranulation in mast cells. Immunity. 2013;38:906–917. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smrž D, Iwaki S, McVicar DW, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. TLR-mediated signaling pathways circumvent the requirement for DAP12 in mast cells for the induction of inflammatory mediator release. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:3557–3569. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kuehn HS, Gilfillan AM. G protein-coupled receptors and the modification of FcεRI-mediated mast cell activation. Immunology letters. 2007;113:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kijima Y, Ogunbunmi E, Fleischer S. Drug action of thapsigargin on the Ca2+ pump protein of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:22912–22918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lytton J, Westlin M, Hanley MR. Thapsigargin inhibits the sarcoplasmic or endoplasmic reticulum Ca-ATPase family of calcium pumps. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:17067–17071. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Choi OH, Lee JH, Kassessinoff T, Cunha-Melo JR, Jones SVP, Beaven MA. Antigen and carbachol mobilize calcium by similar mechanisms in a transfected mast cell line (RBL-2H3 cells) that expresses ml muscarinic receptors. J Immunol. 1993;151:5586–5595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tkaczyk C, Beaven MA, Brachman SM, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. The phospholipase Cγ1-dependent pathway of FcεRI-mediated mast cell activation is regulated independently of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:48474–48484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301350200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Smrž D, Bandara G, Beaven MA, Metcalfe DD, Gilfillan AM. Prevention of F-actin assembly switches the response to SCF from chemotaxis to degranulation in human mast cells. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:1873–1882. doi: 10.1002/eji.201243214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cohen R, Corwith K, Holowka D, Baird B. Spatiotemporal resolution of mast cell granule exocytosis reveals correlation with Ca2+ wave initiation. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:2986–2994. doi: 10.1242/jcs.102632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boulbés DR, Shaiken T, Sarbassov DD. Endoplasmic reticulum is a main localization site of mTORC2. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2011;413:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ma HT, Beaven MA. Regulation of Ca2+ signaling with particular focus on mast cells. Critical reviews in immunology. 2009;29:155–186. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v29.i2.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pang ZP, Südhof TC. Cell biology of Ca2+-triggered exocytosis. Current opinion in cell biology. 2010;22:496–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tolarová H, Dráberová L, Heneberg P, Dráber P. Involvement of filamentous actin in setting the threshold for degranulation in mast cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:1627–1636. doi: 10.1002/eji.200424991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pendleton A, Koffer A. Effects of latrunculin reveal requirements for the actin cytoskeleton during secretion from mast cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2001;48:37–51. doi: 10.1002/1097-0169(200101)48:1<37::AID-CM4>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nishida K, Yamasaki S, Ito Y, Kabu K, Hattori K, Tezuka T, Nishizumi H, Kitamura D, Goitsuka R, Geha RS, Yamamoto T, Yagi T, Hirano T. FcεRI-mediated mast cell degranulation requires calcium-independent microtubule-dependent translocation of granules to the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:115–126. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200501111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Deng Z, Zink T, Chen HY, Walters D, Liu FT, Liu GY. Impact of actin rearrangement and degranulation on the membrane structure of primary mast cells: a combined atomic force and laser scanning confocal microscopy investigation. Biophysical journal. 2009;96:1629–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim MS, Rådinger M, Gilfillan AM. The multiple roles of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in mast cell biology. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hanada M, Feng J, Hemmings BA. Structure, regulation and function of PKB/AKT--a major therapeutic target. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1697:3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ruvinsky I, Meyuhas O. Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation: from protein synthesis to cell size. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2006;31:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Magnuson B, Ekim B, Fingar DC. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. The Biochemical journal. 2012;441:1–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liu Y, Vertommen D, Rider MH, Lai YC. Mammalian target of rapamycin-independent S6K1 and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation during contraction in rat skeletal muscle. Cell Signal. 2013;25:1877–1886. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Oh WJ, Jacinto E. mTOR complex 2 signaling and functions. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:2305–2316. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.14.16586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wander SA, Hennessy BT, Slingerland JM. Next-generation mTOR inhibitors in clinical oncology: how pathway complexity informs therapeutic strategy. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1231–1241. doi: 10.1172/JCI44145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hresko RC, Mueckler M. mTOR. RICTOR is the Ser473 kinase for Akt/protein kinase B in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:40406–40416. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508361200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Paz PE, Wang S, Clarke H, Lu X, Stokoe D, Abo A. Mapping the Zap-70 phosphorylation sites on LAT (linker for activation of T cells) required for recruitment and activation of signalling proteins in T cells. The Biochemical journal. 2001;356:461–471. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3560461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Saitoh S, Arudchandran R, Manetz TS, Zhang W, Sommers CL, Love PE, Rivera J, Samelson LE. LAT is essential for FcεRI-mediated mast cell activation. Immunity. 2000;12:525–535. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang W, Sloan-Lancaster J, Kitchen J, Trible RP, Samelson LE. LAT: the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell. 1998;92:83–92. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80901-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Su YW, Jumaa H. LAT links the pre-BCR to calcium signaling. Immunity. 2003;19:295–305. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00202-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jacinto E, Lorberg A. TOR regulation of AGC kinases in yeast and mammals. The Biochemical journal. 2008;410:19–37. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Boulbes D, Chen CH, Shaikenov T, Agarwal NK, Peterson TR, Addona TA, Keshishian H, Carr SA, Magnuson MA, Sabatini DM, Sarbassov Dos D. Rictor phosphorylation on the Thr-1135 site does not require mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8:896–906. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







