Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications
. 2014 Nov 14;70(Pt 12):1668–1670. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14024595

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of a putative acetylxylan esterase from Talaromyces cellulolyticus

Masahiro Watanabe a, Kazuhiko Ishikawa a,*
PMCID: PMC4259237  PMID: 25484223

Acetylxylan esterase from T. cellulolyticus expressed as a truncated form without the cellulose-binding module 1 domain was purified and crystallized. The crystal diffracted to 1.50 Å resolution using synchrotron radiation.

Keywords: biomass, fungus, hemicellulose, cellulase

Abstract

Acetylxylan esterase (AXE) catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of the ester bond between acetic acid and hemicellulose in plant cell walls. A putative AXE gene exhibiting high homology to carbohydrate esterase family 3 was found in the genome database of the fungus Talaromyces cellulolyticus (formerly known as Acremonium cellulolyticus). A truncated form of the protein, the catalytic domain of the enzyme, was prepared and crystallized. The best crystal was obtained at 293 K using 0.17 M ammonium sulfate, 28% PEG 4000, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 0.5%(w/v) n-octyl-β-d-glucoside. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 1.50 Å resolution. The crystal belonged to space group P41212 or P43212, with unit-cell parameters a = 70.90, b = 70.90, c = 87.09 Å. One enzyme molecule per asymmetric unit gave a crystal volume per protein mass (V M) of 2.62 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 53.0%(v/v).

1. Introduction  

Lignocellulosic biomass in the plant cell wall, which is the most abundant carbon source on Earth, is a highly complicated macromolecular structure comprising various carbohydrate polymers (Sunna & Antranikian, 1997). Lignocellulose is effectively degraded by microbial biological processes (Sunna & Antranikian, 1997), which is of increasing industrial significance for the production of biofuels and biomaterials (Christov & Prior, 1993). However, most cell-wall polysaccharides, including xylan, mannan and glucomannan, are largely acetylated or acylated, and thus sterically inhibit access of glycoside hydrolases and prevent their attack on the glycosidic linkages in the polysaccharides. Removal of the acetylated moieties by carbohydrate esterases could therefore accelerate the degradation of polysaccharides by glycoside hydrolases (Chávez et al., 2006; van den Brink & Vries, 2011).

The fungus Talaromyces cellulolyticus (formerly known as Acremonium cellulolyticus) produces large quantities of various cellulases. A putative acetylxylan esterase gene (axe; Gene ID AB937137) belonging to carbohydrate esterase family 3 (CE3) (acetylxylan esterase; AXE; EC 3.1.1.72; Correia et al., 2008) was identified in T. cellulolyticus by an amino-acid sequence homology search. T. cellulolyticus AXE (TcAXE) comprises 283 amino acids that fold to provide four structural components: a putative N-terminal signal peptide, a catalytic core domain, a serine/threonine-rich linker region and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM-1) at the C-terminus. However, we have not yet identified the activity of TcAXE. In this study, we expressed, prepared and crystallized the catalytic domain (amino acids 21–226, molecular weight 22.5 kDa) of the enzyme, which was named TcAXE206. No crystallographic data have been reported for any fungal AXE (CE3) and little structural information is available for this enzyme class. Here, we report the first crystals of TcAXE206 suitable for X-ray analysis at atomic resolution.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Macromolecule production  

cDNA encoding the axe gene was amplified by reverse transcription PCR from T. cellulolyticus CF-2612 genomic DNA. The amplified full-length cDNA was subcloned and the catalytic domain was truncated by PCR. The truncated gene encoding TcAXE206 was ligated into the pET-11a vector (Novagen, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) with NdeI/BamHI sites (underlined in Table 1). The gene was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). The harvested cells were resuspended in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl and then lysed by sonication, followed by centrifugation at 35 870g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was applied onto a HiTrap Q HP column (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl. The protein was eluted using an increasing linear gradient of NaCl. Fractions containing the target protein were pooled, dialyzed into 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 2 M NaCl and applied onto a HiTrap Butyl HP column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with the same buffer. The protein was eluted using a decreasing linear gradient of NaCl. Finally, the eluted protein was applied onto a Superdex 200 16/60 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl. The purity of the enzyme was confirmed by SDS–PAGE. The protein concentration was determined using the molar extinction coefficient of 36 105 M −1 cm−1 calculated from the amino-acid sequence (Gill & von Hippel, 1989). Detailed information on enzyme production is given in Table 1.

Table 1. Macromolecule-production information.

Source organism T. cellulolyticus
DNA source T. cellulolyticus CF-2612
Forward primer AATCATATGGTCAAAGTCATGCTGCTCG
Reverse primer ATTGGATCCTTAAGAGACGTCCTTGATGAG
Cloning vector pUC19
Expression vector pET-11a
Expression host E. coli BL21(DE3)
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct produced MVKVMLLGDSITEITCWRPLVWEQITSAGLAGSVDFVGSMNDLQPNCSRPQGFDPDHEGHSGWQAYDIARNNIAGWVQNTKPDIVQFMLGTNDVNIGHRNADSIIGSYTIMLNAMRAANPRVKVIVDKIIPTSWSDATIEAVNTAIPGWVQQQTTAESPVVIADCSRAAGFTNDMLRDDGVHPNSKGDQFIAGQIGPKLIQLIKDVS

2.2. Crystallization  

The purified protein was concentrated to 10 mg ml−1 using an Amicon Centricon YM-10 (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). Initial crystallization screening was performed manually using Wizard Classic 1 and 2 and Wizard Classic 3 and 4 (Emerald Bio, Bainbridge Island, Washington, USA) by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method at 293 K. Each drop comprised 0.5 µl protein solution and 0.5 µl reservoir solution and was equilibrated against 60 µl reservoir solution. After one week, small crystals were obtained using several conditions, of which No. 30 from Wizard Classic 3 and 4 [170 mM ammonium sulfate, 25.5%(w/v) PEG 4000, 15%(v/v) glycerol] was the most promising. The best-quality crystals of the enzyme were obtained when using a final concentration of 0.5%(w/v) n-octyl-β-d-glucoside (βOG) as an additive. Details of the method of crystallization are given in Table 2.

Table 2. Crystallization.

Method Hanging-drop vapour diffusion
Plate type TPP
Temperature (K) 293
Protein concentration (mgml1) 10
Buffer composition of protein solution 20mM TrisHCl pH 8.0, 50mM NaCl
Composition of reservoir solution 170mM ammonium sulfate, 28%(w/v) PEG 4000, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 0.5%(w/v) OG
Volume and ratio of drop 4l (1:1)
Volume of reservoir (ml) 1

2.3. Data collection and processing  

Selected crystals were harvested and immersed in a cryoprotectant with the same composition as the mother liquor. The soaked crystal was immediately flash-cooled under a stream of nitrogen gas at 100 K. X-ray diffraction data for TcAXE206 were collected on the BL44XU beamline at SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan. The data were processed to 1.5 Å resolution using HKL-2000 (DENZO and SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Detailed information on data collection and processing is given in Table 3.

Table 3. Data collection and processing.

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell.

Diffraction source BL44XU, SPring-8
Wavelength () 0.9
Temperature (K) 100
Detector Rayonix MX225-HE
Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) 180
Rotation range per image () 1.0
Total rotation range () 150
Exposure time per image (s) 1.0
Space group P41212 or P43212
a, b, c () 70.90, 70.90, 87.09
, , () 90, 90, 90
Mosaicity () 0.3
Resolution range () 50.01.5 (1.531.50)
Total No. of reflections 248943
No. of unique reflections 35924
Completeness (%) 99.0 (95.8)
Multiplicity 6.9 (3.7)
I/(I) 26.5 (2.3)
R merge (%) 6.9 (42.0)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where I i(hkl) is the intensity of the ith measurement of reflection hkl and I(hkl) is the mean value of I i(hkl) for all i measurements.

3. Results and discussion  

Tetragonal bipyramidal crystals were obtained after two weeks. The average dimensions of the crystals were about 0.15 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm. Diffraction data were collected to a resolution limit of 1.50 Å. The data consisted of 248 943 measurements and 35 924 unique reflections. Data collection and analysis revealed that the crystal belonged to space group P41212 or P43212, with unit-cell parameters a = 70.90, b = 70.90, c = 87.09 Å. Scaling and merging of the crystallographic data resulted in an overall R merge of 6.9%. The data set had an overall completeness of 99.0%. The data-collection and refinement statistics are given in Table 3. There was one enzyme molecule per asymmetric unit, giving a crystal volume per protein mass (V M) of 2.62 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 53.0%(v/v) (Matthews, 1968). Determination of the structure of TcAXE206 is in progress and the structural information obtained will be used for functional analysis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Tatsuya Fujii, Dr Hiyoyuki Inoue and Ms Miyu Sumii, members of the Biomass Refinery Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science, for their helpful suggestions. The X-ray diffraction data were obtained on the BL44XU beamline at SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan with the approval of the Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan (proposal No. 2013B6803).

References

  1. Brink, J. van den & de Vries, R. P. (2011). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91, 1477–1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Chávez, R., Bull, P. & Eyzaguirre, J. (2006). J. Biotechnol. 123, 413–433. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Christov, L. P. & Prior, B. A. (1993). Enzyme Microb. Technol. 15, 460–475. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Correia, M. A. S., Prates, J. A. M., Brás, J., Fontes, C. M. G. A., Newman, J. A., Lewis, R. J., Gilbert, H. J. & Flint, J. E. (2008). J. Mol. Biol. 379, 64–72. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Gill, S. C. & von Hippel, P. H. (1989). Anal. Biochem. 182, 319–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Sunna, A. & Antranikian, G. (1997). Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 17, 39–67. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica. Section F, Structural Biology Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES