Abstract
RCK domains form a family of ligand-binding domains found in many prokaryotic K+ channels and transport proteins. While many RCK domains contain an apparent nucleotide binding motif, some are known instead to bind Ca2+, which can then facilitate channel opening. Here we report on the molecular architecture and ligand-activation properties of an RCK-containing potassium channel cloned from the prokaryote Thermoplasma volcanium. This channel, called TvoK, is of an apparent molecular mass and subunit composition that is consistent with the hetero-octameric configuration hypothesized for the related MthK channel, in which four channel-tethered RCK domains coassemble with four soluble (untethered) RCK domains. The expression of soluble TvoK RCK subunits arises from an unconventional UUG start codon within the TvoK gene; silent mutagenesis of this alternative start codon abolishes expression of the soluble form of the TvoK RCK domain. Using single-channel recording of purified, reconstituted TvoK, we found that the channel is activated by Ca2+, as well as Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ni2+. This non-selective divalent activation is in contrast with the activation properties of MthK, which is selectively activated by Ca2+. Transplantation of the TvoK RCK domain into MthK generates a channel that can be activated by Mg2+, illustrating that the Mg2+ binding site is likely contained within the RCK domain. We present a working hypothesis for TvoK gating in which the binding of either Ca2+ or Mg2+ can contribute ~5 kcal/mole toward stabilization of the channel’s open conformation.
Potassium channels are central to a wide range of biological processes, including electrical signaling, electrolyte homeostasis, and cell volume regulation (1). The activation states of several types of potassium channels and their relatives can be modulated by cytoplasmic ligands, such as G-proteins, calmodulin, or cyclic nucleotides; some of these ligands bind to modular domains that show remarkable sequence conservation across phyla. One such ligand-binding domain is the RCK (or KTN) domain, which is found in many prokaryotic K+ channels and transport proteins as well as the eukaryotic BK channel (2-5). Many RCK domains contain a consensus nucleotide-binding motif, such as those from the KtrA and TrkA transporter-associated proteins (6-8). Another class of RCK domain, however, contains no apparent nucleotide-binding motif, but instead contains a Ca2+ binding site. So far, the only two channels that have been demonstrated to contain a Ca2+-binding RCK domain are the BK channel and the prokaryotic channel MthK (2,3,9-11).
X-ray and biochemical studies have suggested that the cytoplasmic ligand-binding region of MthK is formed by an octameric ring of RCK domains, with four “tethered” RCK domains that are directly connected to the transmembrane pore, and four “soluble” RCK domains (without transmembrane segments) that are docked onto the tethered RCKs (2,12). An alternating arrangment of tethered and soluble RCK domains gives rise to the octameric ring assembly, called the “gating ring” due to its role in Ca2+-dependent gating of the MthK pore (2,12). The soluble MthK RCK domain arises from an alternative AUG start codon within the MthK gene, just upstream from the RCK domain coding sequence. Mutation of this second start codon eliminates heterologous overexpression of “soluble” MthK RCK domain in E.coli while permitting overexpression of full-length subunits with “tethered” RCK domains; (2). However, many RCK-containing K+ channels do not contain an AUG codon upstream from the RCK domain, and eliminating the internal start codon does not necessarily abolish channel function in vivo (13). Thus it has not been entirely clear whether the octameric RCK domain architecture observed with MthK is generally applicable, or whether alternative mechanisms exist to generate this architecture.
The presence of an apparent RCK domain within the BK channel C-terminus has prompted the use of MthK as a limited structural template for BK channels (Figure 1) (2,3,9-11). This in turn has provided insight toward potential ligand-activation mechanisms for BK channels. However, the correspondence between the Ca2+ binding site of MthK and those of BK channels is not clear. For example, BK channels contain multiple Ca2+ binding sites, which operate in low (millimolar) and high (micromolar) affinity ranges (14-16). MthK displays millimolar affinity activation by Ca2+ at room temperature (2,3,9-11). However, the low affinity site of the BK channel also imparts activation by Mg2+, while MthK has been shown to be insensitive to Mg2+ (10,12,16,17). It is possible that the Ca2+ binding site of MthK does not correspond to the BK channel site. Alternatively, it is possible that these Ca2+ binding sites are homologous structures, although structural elements that impart Mg2+ sensitivity are absent from the MthK site.
Fig. 1.
Partial sequence alignment of MthK, TvoK, and the mouse BK channel (mslo1). The alignment begins at the K+ channel signature sequence (filter). Secondary structure assignment is based on the MthK crystal structure: bars and arrows indicate α-helices and β-strands, respectively. Grey/black shading indicates semi-conserved/conserved residues. Red indicates Glu-374 and Glu-399 in mouse BK, which are essential for BK’s Mg2+ sensing; blue indicates three Ca2+ -coordinating residues in MthK (Asp-184, Glu-210, Glu-212).
During a survey of prokaryotic RCK-containing proteins, we identified and cloned a putative potassium channel from Thermoplasma volcanium. This putative channel, TvoK, lacks an AUG start codon in the region preceding the RCK domain, so we wondered whether this protein might form a channel with a non-octameric architecture, or whether the TvoK gene might generate a soluble RCK domain without the AUG start codon. In addition, the RCK domain of TvoK contained structural features that were in common with BK channels, but absent from MthK (e.g. residues between αA and βB, and between βD and αD; Figure 1). It would ultimately be of interest to resolve whether these structural elements contribute to ligand binding or ligand selectivity in the RCK domain.
In this paper we report on the molecular architecture and function of TvoK. Although the gene does not contain a second AUG start codon preceding its RCK domain, it does contain an unconventional UUG start codon that results in efficient translation of a soluble TvoK RCK domain. The soluble RCK domain co-purifies with full-length subunits, consistent with a hetero-octameric channel assembly. Using single-channel recording in planar lipid bilayers, we found that reconstituted TvoK channels are activated not only by Ca2+, but also by Mg2+, Mn2+ or Ni2+, in contrast to MthK, which is activated only by Ca2+. In chimeric channels containing the MthK pore domain, activation by Mg2+ can be imparted by the TvoK RCK domain, suggesting that the RCK domain contains the Mg2+ activation site, and that the RCK domain is modular in the sense that ligand-binding to this domain can yield the opening of an otherwise different K+ channel pore. Finally, kinetic modeling suggests that activation of TvoK by Ca2+ or Mg2+ is energetically roughly equivalent, and either Ca2+ or Mg2+ binding contributes ~5 kcal/mole toward stabilization of the open state.
Experimental Procedures
Channel constructs
The TvoK gene was PCR-cloned from T.volcanium genomic DNA (ATCC) using primers that added an SphI restriction site to the 5′ end of the gene, the cDNA code for a C-terminal thrombin cleavage site, and a BamHI site to the 3′ end. The PCR product was gel-purified and ligated into the pCR-Blunt vector. After removal of an internal SphI site in the coding region by silent mutagenesis, the TvoK gene was subcloned into a modified pQE-82L vector (Qiagen; (11) between the SphI and BamHI sites to generate a thrombin-cleavable hexahistidine-tagged fusion construct.
The TvoK wild-type protein could not practically be overexpressed in E.coli at levels sufficient for our biochemical or functional studies. We fortuitously generated a well-expressing construct by deleting a region of seven residues near the outer mouth of the putative pore region (residues Leu-39 to Lys-45), after discovering that the analogous stretch of residues is apparently absent from MthK. Several other deletions in the region bounded by residues 39-45 were tested, but none could be consistently overexpressed as well as TvoKΔ(39-45). This construct was used in all of our subsequent biochemical and functional studies of the full-length channel.
Protein Purification
TvoKΔ(39-45) was overexpressed overnight in E. coli (XL1-Blue, Stratagene) upon induction with 0.4 mM IPTG at 20°C. Cells were harvested, resuspended and lysed by sonication in 50 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, 10% v/v glycerol, pH 8.5, supplemented with Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablets (Roche; 1 tablet per 50 ml lysate) and 0.1 mM PMSF, at 4°C. Membranes were solubilized by incubation at 4°C for 2 h in 50 mM decyl maltoside (DM, Anatrace). Insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation (16,000 rpm; 45 min), and the supernatant was collected. The pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 8.5 and the supernatant was loaded onto a CoCl2-activated NTA-HiTrap column (GE Healthcare). The column was washed with 10 volumes of buffer A (20 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM DM, pH 8.5) followed by 10 volumes of buffer A containing 20 mM imidazole. The recombinant protein was eluted with buffer A containing 400 mM imidazole. The hexahistidine tag was removed by thrombin digestion for 2h at room temperature. The digest was concentrated to ~10 mg/ml using an Amicon-Ultra centrifugal concentrator (molecular weight cutoff 50,000), and the oligomeric channel assembly was further isolated in buffer A by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex-200 10/300 column (GE Healthcare). Fractions that were eluted from the Superdex-200 column between ~9.5 and 11 ml were pooled and concentrated to 10 mg/ml using an Amicon concentrator (Millipore). Expression and purification of MthK wild-type or MthK-TvoK chimeric channel was performed as described previously for MthK channels (11).
Electrophysiology
The purified TvoKΔ(39-45) assembly was reconstituted into liposomes composed of E.coli lipids (Avanti Polar Lipids) as described previously (18). The concentration of protein per lipid in the case of TvoKΔ(39-45) and MthK-TvoK chimeric channel was 50 μg per mg, and for MthK wild-type 5 to 10 μg per mg. Single-channel recordings were obtained using planar lipids bilayers of POPE: POPG (3:1) lipids (Avanti Polar Lipids), in a horizontal bilayer apparatus. Solutions in both the cis and trans chambers contained 200 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2 with the addition of either CaCl2, MgCl2, MnCl2, or NiCl2 at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 25 mM. We estimated the concentration of contaminating Ca2+ in our solutions to be ~10 μM, as measured with Ca2+-sensitive electrode (Orion Research). Because of the relatively high concentrations of divalent cations used, no divalent cation buffers were included in the recording solutions. All experiments were performed at room temperature (22-24° C).
Orientation of channels in the bilayer membrane was identified using the intrinsic inward rectification property of the channel, which is similar to MthK (2). TvoKΔ(39-45) displayed a form of voltage-dependent inactivation or blockade, such that observing channel activity required intermittent hyperpolarizing steps. We have not yet characterized this phenomenon in detail, except to note that it was observed at different ligand concentrations and in the presence of each of the different divalent cations used in these studies. A similar phenomenon has been observed in recordings of MthK in spheroplast membranes (19).
Electrophysiological data were analyzed using Clampfit 9.2 (Molecular Devices) and are expressed as mean ± SEM from three to seven different experiments for each data point. Channel activity was quantified as N × Po, and this value was in all cases divided by the number of active channels in the bilayer (N) to estimate the mean open probability (Po). At low divalent ion concentrations that produced low levels of channel activation (Po < 0.25), N was estimated at the end of the experiment by maximally activating the channels using 10 mM Ca2+ added to the apparent cytoplasmic side.
RESULTS
To find potentially novel putative K+ channels containing RCK-like cytoplasmic domains, we performed a BLASTp search of archaeal genes using the putative mouse BK channel RCK domain (mslo1, residues His-344 through Cys-619) as the template sequence (2,20,21). Our search revealed, among others, a significant result that contained a K+ channel selectivity filter sequence (TVGYG) and at least two putative transmembrane (TM) segments. This was a 348 amino acid putative K+ transport protein from Thermoplasma volcanium (Genbank accession number NP111507), which we called TvoK. Surprisingly, MthK was not returned as a significant result under our search parameters. The search statistics revealed remarkable similarity (40%) and identity (20%) between mslo1 and TvoK within the search region, illustrated in Figure 1. Comparison of the protein sequences of the full-length TvoK subunit and MthK are consistent with an orthologous relation between these two proteins (48% similarity; 25% identity).
Overexpression and purification of TvoK
In our initial studies, we observed poor expression of the TvoK wild-type protein in E.coli combined with a decrease in culture density, indicating a toxic effect of this protein on E.coli. In an effort to generate a better expressing construct, we performed a comparative alignment of TvoK and MthK pore regions and found that TvoK contains seven additional amino acids in the loop between the putative TM1 and pore helix. When we deleted this short segment, from residues Leu-39 to Lys-45 (Figure 1), we observed decreased apparent toxicity and greater protein expression. Figure 2A illustrates that the TvoKΔ(39-45) expression products (visualized via anti-penta-His antibody) migrate on SDS-PAGE primarily in two bands, with apparent molecular masses of 38 kDa and 26 kDa. These are consistent with the predicted masses of the full-length construct and the ~250 residue C-terminal fragment of this construct.
Fig. 2.
Molecular architecture of TvoK. A, Expression of TvoK yields two proteins: 1) the “full-length” pore-forming subunit (blue bar) and 2) the soluble RCK domain (red bar), starting at residue 115. Western blot analysis of TvoK proteins is shown at the right, demonstrating that mutation of the start codon eliminates soluble RCK domain expression, and mutations in the Shine-Dalgarno sequence can reduce RCK expression by ~50%. B, Gel-filtration profile and Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE of purified TvoKΔ(39-45). The channel protein elutes at 10.5 ml (using a Superdex-200 10/300 column); protein from +/− 0.5 ml of this peak run as three bands on SDS-PAGE: bands at 26 and 38 kDa correspond to the RCK domain and full-length monomeric subunit, respectively, identified via mass spectrometry. The ~200 kDa band corresponds to an oligomer that contains full-length subunits, also identified via mass spectrometry.
The TvoKΔ(39-45) expression products were purified by metal-affinity chromatography followed by gel filtration chromatography. The DM-solubilized protein elutes with a peak at ~10.5 ml on a Superdex-200 10/300 column, consistent with a ~250 kDa assembly, estimated by comparison to elution of protein standards using this column (Figure 2B).
The apparent 250 kDa assembly is consistent with a hetero-octamer comprised of four full-length subunits and four RCK domains, as was hypothesized for MthK (2). Consistent with this hypothetical architecture, the purified TvoK assembly partially dissociates in SDS-containing sample buffer, and migrates with apparent molecular masses of ~200 kDa, 38 kDa and 26 kDa (Figure 2B, right). Each of these bands were identified by in-gel tryptic digest followed by mass spectrometry of the tryptic fragments, and the mass fingerprints are consistent with TvoKΔ(39-45) (identified in the ~200 and 38 kDa bands) and the TvoK RCK domain (identified in the 26 kDa band).
Mechanism underlying generation of the soluble TvoK RCK domain
Interestingly, the TvoK gene contains no secondary AUG start codon in its TM2-RCK linker region, as is the case with MthK; thus we were puzzled by the appearance of the soluble TvoK RCK domain. Although GUG also occasionally serves as a start codon in prokaryotes (in 14% of E.coli genes; (22), the TvoK gene contains no GUG in this region either.
Because of the importance of the soluble RCK domain in determining the molecular architecture of these channels, we explored two possibilities for the generation of this protein. One possibility is the existence of a protease-vulnerable cleavage site at the amino end of the RCK domain. We reasoned that any (or several) of the basic residues in this region could be vulnerable to cleavage by endogenous E. coli proteases.
To narrow down the array of possible cleavage sites, we first estimated the molecular mass of the purified RCK domain by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. The estimated mass was 26,230 Da, consistent with the mass of the TvoK RCK domain starting from Leu-115, and ending at the thrombin cleavage site (with the putative last ten residues = EEAIKGLVPR). This result suggested a possible cleavage site at the carboxyl side of Lys-114, possibly due to activity of the Lys-C protease, for example.
To test for the presence of one or more protease-vulnerable cleavage sites near this residue, we generated site-specific mutants of Lys→Asn or Arg→Asn at positions Arg-111, Lys-114, and Lys-117, overexpressed the mutants in E. coli, and probed the lysate for hexahistidine-tagged proteins by Western blot. If any of these residues were important for recognition or cleavage by a Lys- or Arg-protease, then mutation to Asn should eliminate or reduce cleavage and thus result in a reduction in the 26 kDa band. We observed that neither the K114N or K117N mutations reduce the relative intensity of the 26 kDa band compared to wild-type (not shown). However, R111N did reduce the relative intensity of the 26 kDa band (Figure 2). If this were due to a reduction of proteolytic cleavage at this site, however, then one would have expected the mass of the wild-type RCK fragment to be significantly larger than the estimated 26,230 Da.
We therefore considered an alternative possibility, that the TvoK gene contains a second start codon that is neither AUG nor GUG, but UUG, which is rarely used a start codon in many prokaryotes (23,24). Such a UUG codon (normally translated as Leu) does exist at the 3′ side of the codon for Lys-114, consistent with the presumed N-terminus of the soluble RCK domain. This codon is preceded by an optimal Shine-Dalgarno (SD) ribosome-binding sequence (AGGAGG) that overlaps with the codons for Arg-111 and Arg-112; thus the reduction of the 26 kDa band observed with the R111N mutation is consistent with reduced translation efficiency due to disruption of the SD sequence.
To test the hypothesis that TvoK uses the rare UUG start codon, we constructed the mutants L115N (TTG→AAT) and L115L (TTG→CTG). Each of these mutants eliminate the putative UUG start codon, and L115L does so without changing the amino acid sequence. The results (Figure 2A, right) illustrate that each of these mutants specifically abolishes the 26 kDa band without reducing the 38 kDa band. Together, these results indicate that UUG is a start codon for translation of the soluble TvoK RCK domain.
TvoKΔ(39-45) can be activated by Ca2+ or Mg2+
Many RCK domains contain a consensus nucleotide-binding motif (GXGXXG), while the only known examples of RCK domains that bind Ca2+ are MthK and the mammalian BK channel. A sequence comparison between TvoK and MthK indicated that the acidic Ca2+-coordinating sidechains in MthK may also be present at the proper locations in the TvoK RCK domain, while the consensus GXGXXG motif found in nucleotide-binding RCK domains is absent from TvoK (Figure 1).
To determine the activation mechanism of the putative TvoK channel, purified TvoKΔ(39-45) was reconstituted in liposomes, which in turn were incorporated into planar lipid bilayers to obtain single-channel recordings. We observed little consistent channel activity in solutions containing only 200 mM KCl and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, at both sides of the membrane. However, we observed that channel activity consistently increased when CaCl2 was included in the recording solutions (Figure 3A). Using recordings obtained under bi-ionic conditions (150 mM NaCl and 50 mM KCl cis: 200 mM KCl trans, with 5 mM CaCl2 on both sides), we found that TvoKΔ(39-45) is selective for K+ over Na+ by a ratio of at least 100:1, as determined by the shift of the reversal potential to EK (not shown). In symmetrical 200 mM KCl, 5 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, TvoK displays inward rectification, similar to that observed with the closely related MthK, with a chord conductance of 160 ± 9.0 pS at −200 mV (Figure 3C).
Fig. 3.
TvoKΔ(39-45) can be activated by Ca2+ or Mg2+ A, B, Representative current traces of single TvoKΔ(39-45) channels, recorded at −200 mV in 200 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, containing Ca2+ or Mg2+, as indicated. Po increased with increasing [Ca2+] or [Mg 2+]; single-channel current amplitude decreased, consistent with fast block. C, Single-channel current-voltage curves for TvoKΔ(39-45) (black circles) and MthK (black triangles) in symmetrical bath solutions with 200 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM Ca2+, pH 7.2. D, TvoKΔ(39-45) Po as a function of [Ca2+] (black circles) or [Mg2+] (white squares). Po was determined from 3-5 different bilayer recordings at each condition, plotted as mean ± SEM. Experimental data were fitted with Hill equations, yielding an EC50 of 2.9 mM and Hill coefficient of 1.7 for Ca2+ and EC50 of 2.0 mM and Hill coefficient of 2.2 for Mg2+.
We quantified the relation between Po and [Ca2+], and found that Ca2+ activates the channel over the mM range (Figure 3A, D). Fitting these data with a Hill equation yielded an EC50 of 2.9 mM and a Hill coefficient of 1.7, consistent with the binding of at least two Ca2+ ions per channel to promote opening. If TvoK assumes the same molecular architecture as MthK with eight RCK domains containing one Ca2+ binding site each, then the Hill coefficient of 1.7 would be consistent with a relatively weak positive cooperativity among subunits to stabilize the open state.
Although both MthK and the mammalian BK channel display low-affinity activation by Ca2+, Ca2+-activation in MthK appears to be relatively selective; i.e. Mg2+ does not activate MthK, and biochemical assays suggest that Mg2+ does not stabilize the MthK RCK gating ring (10,12). To determine whether ligand-activation of TvoK shows the same selectivity as MthK and thus (possibly) a single binding site of roughly the same properties, we tested the activation properties of the channel in the presence of other divalent cations. We found that TvoK is activated by Mg2+ in the millimolar range (Figure 3B, D). We then quantified the relation between Po and [Mg2+], and found that Mg2+, similar to Ca2+, activates the channel with an EC50 of 2.0 mM, and a Hill coefficient of 2.2.
TvoKΔ(39-45) can be activated by Mn2+ and Ni2+
Investigations of BK channel modulation have revealed that a number of divalent cations, like Mn2+, Ni2+, Co2+, or Sr2+, activate the channel, through a low affinity site defined in part by Glu-374 and Glu-399, located in the channel’s RCK domain (Figure 1; (16,25). To determine whether a similar non-selective divalent cation-activation site may exist in the TvoK RCK domain, we obtained recordings from TvoK channels in the presence of either 10 mM Mn2+ or 10 mM Ni2+.
Figure 4 shows that TvoK can be activated to near maximal levels by either 10 mM Mn2+ or Ni2+. Thus Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ni2+ may bind to either an identical or overlapping activation site on the TvoK RCK domain; alternatively, there may be multiple, distinct sites that coordinate subsets of these ions.
Fig. 4.
TvoKΔ(39-45) can be activated by Mn2+ or Ni2+. Representative current traces of TvoKΔ(39-45) channels in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ni2+. Recordings were obtained at −200 mV in symmetrical 200 mM KCl bathing solutions.
The TvoK RCK domain can impart Mg2+-dependent activation to an MthK pore
It was observed in previous studies that MthK is activated by Ca2+, but not by Mg2+ (10). To determine whether the Mg2+ activates TvoK by binding to a site on its RCK domain, we exploited the Mg2+ insensitivity of MthK and generated a chimeric channel containing the MthK transmembrane domains with the TvoK RCK domain. Figure 5 (top panel) illustrates that adding Mg2+ at the cytoplasmic side of the TvoK channel results in a rapid increase in Po, concomitant with a decrease in single-channel conductance that is consistent with fast divalent blockade (9,26). In experiments like those shown in Figure 5, 10 mM Mg2+ at the cytoplasmic side of the channel was sufficient to produce near maximal activation (Po = 0.80 ± 0.03) In contrast, addition of Mg2+ had no effect on MthK Po, but did decrease the single-channel conductance.
Fig. 5.
Modular nature of the TvoK RCK domain. Representative current traces illustrating Mg2+ dependent activation of channels containing the TvoK RCK domain. In the top (TvoKΔ(39-45)) and bottom (chimera) traces, 0.1 mM Ca2+ was present to activate low levels of channel activity; MgCl2 was then added to the solution bathing the cytoplasmic face of the channel to a final concentration of 10 mM. This increased Po of TvoKΔ(39-45) by ~23-fold and increased Po of the chimeric channel by ~5-fold. Adding Mg2+ had nominal effects on MthK activity (middle trace). Po was estimated assuming one active channel in each of the top two traces and four active channels in the bottom (chimera) trace. Vm=−200 mV.
Adding Mg2+ at the cytoplasmic side of the MthK-TvoK chimera results in a rapid increase in Po, consistent with a Mg2+-activation site on the TvoK RCK domain (Figure 5, bottom panel). However, with the addition of 10 mM Mg2+ the Po of the chimera did not reach the same level as that observed with TvoK. This could be due to differences between MthK and TvoK in the mechanical work required to open the different pores, resulting in less efficient coupling between ligand binding and channel opening in the chimeric channel. Similar results were obtained using Ca2+ to activate the chimeric channel instead of Mg2+ (not shown).
DISCUSSION
X-ray studies of the MthK channel and its isolated RCK domain have revealed the molecular details of Ca2+ coordination, and thus provide unprecedented insight toward activation mechanisms in RCK-containing K+ channels (2,12). It is important, however, to gain further insight by bridging the phylogenetic gap between MthK and its eukaryotic relative, the BK channel, as well as other members of the slo gene family. Our approach was to mine the genomic database, using the RCK (or RCK1) domain of the mammalian BK channel as bait. In this study, we report on the architecture and activation mechanism of TvoK, an MthK orthologue that is activated by Ca2+ and several other divalent cations, including Mg2+, Mn2+, and Ni2+. Because the BK channel RCK domain contains a putative binding site that imparts activation by Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Ni2+, it seems that further study of TvoK may provide insight toward mechanisms underlying ligand-gating of BK channels (16,27).
Architecture of prokaryotic RCK-containing channels
We were intrigued by the absence of a methionine residue in the post-TM2/pre-RCK linker region of TvoK, because of the apparently critical role of an internal AUG start codon in generating soluble RCK domain for the assembly of MthK and its relatives (2,13,28). After we determined that TvoK contained a rare UUG start codon in this region, we conducted a BLAST search of RCK-containing K+ channels using the TvoK sequence as bait and found several other examples of pre-RCK putative rare start codons (either UUG or the less-rare GUG). These include putative K+ channels from Treponema denticola (NP973037), Bacillus licheniformis (YP092836), Oceanobacillus iheyensis (NP693255), Bacillus subtilis (NP391010 and CAB07933), Bacillus sp. NRRL B-14911 (ZP01173121), Deinococcus radiodurans (NP296057), and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (NP440478). It therefore seems likely that in many prokaryotes, the genes encoding such RCK-containing K+ channels contain an alternative start codon, resulting in translation of both membrane-tethered and soluble RCK domains that assemble to form hetero-octameric channels.
Although UUG is relatively rarely used as a start codon in bacteria (used in ~3% of E. coli genes, compared with 14% for GUG and 83% for AUG), it is used more commonly in archaeal genes and is the most common start codon found in genes from the archaea Aeropyrum pernix (42%, compared with 31% using AUG; (22,29,30). This may be an important consideration in analyses of genes encoding membrane proteins, such as RCK-containing channels and transporters.
We have been able to construct a functional chimeric channel using the transmembrane and cytoplasmic linker region of MthK and the RCK domain of TvoK, which qualitatively preserves ligand activation properties of TvoK. This demonstrates that, at least for these similar channels, the RCK domain is modular, and it implies that a qualitatively similar ligand-dependent conformational change occurs in the two RCK domains that can be coupled to opening of the MthK pore.
Allosteric mechanism and the energetic contributions of divalent binding to channel opening
We have observed that the TvoK RCK domain is modular, in the sense that it can be transplanted onto an MthK pore and confer upon this pore the Ca2+- and Mg2+-activation properties of TvoK. This result implies that both the Ca2+ and Mg2+ binding sites are located within the TvoK RCK domain, and that ligand binding in the RCK domain is coupled to channel gating via an allosteric mechanism.
If we assume that the channel contains eight Ca2+ binding sites, consistent with one Ca2+ binding site within each RCK domain, then we can describe the TvoK Po vs. Ca2+ relation (corresponding to Scheme 1) using:
| (1) |
where K = [Ca2+]/KD, L is the equilibrium constant for channel opening in the absence of ligand, and C is the allosteric coupling factor for Ca2+ binding and channel opening. By fitting the single-channel data with Eq. 1, we can use the fitted parameters to obtain estimates of the free energy difference between open and closed states with a given number of Ca2+ bound to the channel, using:
| (2) |
where n is the number of Ca2+ bound to the closed and open state and RT is 0.59 kcal/mole. If we assume that each Ca2+ binding yields an equivalent energetic contribution to open state stabilization, then the energetic contribution of the binding of each Ca2+ to the stabilization of the open state is given by:
| (3) |
Scheme I.

Po data measured from channels over a range of Ca2+ from 0.1 to 25 mM were fitted with Eq. 1, which yielded parameter estimates of KD=1.3 mM, L=0.0018, and C=2.6. These are consistent with net free energy changes of +3.7 kcal/mole for transition to the open state for unliganded channels and −0.8 kcal/mole for fully liganded channels (from Eq. 2). Thus each Ca2+ binding provides a net contribution of roughly 0.57 kcal/mole toward stabilization of the open state (total of ~4.6 kcal/mole for eight Ca2+). From Eq. 2, these parameters suggest that the binding of at least seven out of eight Ca2+ is required to render the open state energetically more favorable than the closed state.
The apparent effectiveness of Mg2+ for channel activation was similar to that of Ca2+, and yielded similar estimates for the energetic contribution to open state stabilization. For fits with Mg2+, we constrained the estimate of L at 0.0018 to agree with the estimate of L obtained from fits with Ca2+, and this fit gave a KD for Mg2+ of 1.3 mM, and C = 2.9, consistent with a net energetic contribution of 0.63 kcal/mole/Mg2+ toward stabilization of the open state.
Because these parameter and energetic estimates depend on the estimate of L, and we have been unable to directly measure Po in the absence of ligand for these channels, we analyzed further the effect of L on our energetic estimates. Because 0.0018 is likely to be an overestimate of the true value of L, we performed this analysis by setting L to a range of values less than 0.0018 and obtaining new estimates of C for each value of L. For Mg2+, we found that for L =1.8 × 10−4, C = 3.9, and for L =1.8 × 10−5, C = 4.9, consistent with contribution of 0.80 kcal/mole/Mg2+ and 0.94 kcal/mole/Mg2+ toward stabilization of the open state. Similarly, we found that for Ca2+, with L =1.8 × 10−4, C = 3.4, and for L =1.8 × 10−5, C = 4.5, consistent with contribution of 0.72 kcal/mole/Ca2+ and 0.89 kcal/mole/Ca2+ toward stabilization of the open state.
Relation between the MthK Ca2+ binding site and the TvoK RCK domain and possible mechanisms underlying divalent ion selectivity
In the MthK RCK domain, Ca2+ is bound to seven oxygen ligands, consisting of 1) the two oxygens of the Asp-184 sidechain, 2) one oxygen from each of Glu-210 and Glu-212, and 3) three waters of hydration, one of which appears to be stabilized through hydrogen bonding with a nearby serine hydroxyl group (2,12). Sequence alignment suggests that at least two of these sidechain ligands may be present in the TvoK RCK domain, at positions Asp-192 and possibly Glu-226, which align closely with the MthK residues Asp-184 and Glu-210 (Figure 1). The TvoK residue that aligns with Glu-212, however, is not a glutamate but an arginine (Arg-228).
Might Glu-212 be critical for the selectivity of Ca2+ over Mg2+ in MthK? At the MthK Ca2+ binding site, a divalent cation exchanges four hydration waters for protein oxygens (12); while this dehydration may be energetically favorable for Ca2+, it may not be favorable for Mg2+ (31). In TvoK, the absence of a glutamate at this position might allow either Ca2+ or Mg2+ to occupy the site in a more hydrated state.
Alternatively, sequence differences between TvoK and MthK could generate a difference in the spatial arrangement of sidechains at the binding site, and thus a difference in ligand selectivity between MthK and TvoK at this site. It is also possible that TvoK may contain a different complement of ligand coordinating groups within this binding pocket, or it may contain an additional binding pocket at a different location.
Footnotes
We thank Christopher Carroll and Kevin Hakala of the UTHSCSA Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for help with protein identification and mass determination. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM68523) to B.S.R.
The abbreviations used are: TvoK, Thermoplasma volcanium potassium channel; MthK, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum potassium channel; IPTG, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside; POPE, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine; POPG, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)]; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RCK, regulator of conductance of potassium; KTN, potassium transporter nucleotide-binding.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hille B. Ion channels of excitable membranes. 3rd Ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc.; Sunderland, MA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jiang Y, Lee A, Chen J, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. Nature. 2002;417:515–522. doi: 10.1038/417515a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jiang Y, Pico A, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. Neuron. 2001;29:593–601. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00236-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roosild TP, Le KT, Choe S. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roosild TP, Miller S, Booth IR, Choe S. Cell. 2002;109:781–791. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00768-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kroning N, Willenborg M, Tholema N, Hanelt I, Schmid R, Bakker EP. J Biol Chem. 2007 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609084200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schlosser A, Hamann A, Bossemeyer D, Schneider E, Bakker EP. Mol Microbiol. 1993;9:533–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Albright RA, Ibar JL, Kim CU, Gruner SM, Morais-Cabral JH. Cell. 2006;126:1147–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Y, Berke I, Chen L, Jiang Y. J Gen Physiol. 2007;129:109–120. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zadek B, Nimigean CM. J Gen Physiol. 2006;127:673–685. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parfenova LV, Crane BM, Rothberg BS. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:21131–21138. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603109200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dong J, Shi N, Berke I, Chen L, Jiang Y. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:41716–41724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508144200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kuo MM, Saimi Y, Kung C. Embo J. 2003;22:4049–4058. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xia XM, Zeng X, Lingle CJ. Nature. 2002;418:880–884. doi: 10.1038/nature00956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang X, Solaro CR, Lingle CJ. J Gen Physiol. 2001;118:607–636. doi: 10.1085/jgp.118.5.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zeng XH, Xia XM, Lingle CJ. J Gen Physiol. 2005;125:273–286. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200409239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shi J, Krishnamoorthy G, Yang Y, Hu L, Chaturvedi N, Harilal D, Qin J, Cui J. Nature. 2002;418:876–880. doi: 10.1038/nature00941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heginbotham L, Kolmakova-Partensky L, Miller C. J Gen Physiol. 1998;111:741–749. doi: 10.1085/jgp.111.6.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kuo MM, Baker KA, Wong L, Choe S. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:2151–2156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609085104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schaffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, Shavirin S, Spouge JL, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Altschul SF. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2994–3005. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.14.2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Blattner FR, Plunkett G, 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y. Science. 1997;277:1453–1474. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reddy P, Peterkofsky A, McKenney K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:5656–5660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.17.5656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Files JG, Weber K, Coulondre C, Miller JH. J Mol Biol. 1975;95:327–330. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90398-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oberhauser A, Alvarez O, Latorre R. J Gen Physiol. 1988;92:67–86. doi: 10.1085/jgp.92.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ferguson WB. J Gen Physiol. 1991;98:163–181. doi: 10.1085/jgp.98.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cox DH. J Gen Physiol. 2005;125:253–255. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200509270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stingl K, Brandt S, Uhlemann EM, Schmid R, Altendorf K, Zeilinger C, Ecobichon C, Labigne A, Bakker EP, de Reuse H. Embo J. 2007;26:232–241. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kozak M. Gene. 1999;234:187–208. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Torarinsson E, Klenk HP, Garrett RA. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:47–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00674.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dudev T, Lim C. Chem Rev. 2003;103:773–788. doi: 10.1021/cr020467n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





