Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2014 Nov 27;5(11):e1540. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.504

Combination therapy targeting ectopic ATP synthase and 26S proteasome induces ER stress in breast cancer cells

H-Y Chang 1, T-C Huang 2, N-N Chen 3, H-C Huang 4,*, H-F Juan 1,3,5,*
PMCID: PMC4260757  PMID: 25429617

Abstract

F1Fo ATP synthase is present in all organisms and is predominantly located on the inner membrane of mitochondria in eukaryotic cells. The present study demonstrated that ATP synthase and electron transport chain complexes were ectopically expressed on the surface of breast cancer cells and could serve as a potent anticancer target. We investigated the anticancer effects of the ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin on breast cancer cells through proteomic approaches and revealed that differentially expressed proteins in cell cycle regulation and in the unfolded protein response were functionally enriched. We showed that citreoviridin triggered PERK-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation, which in turn attenuated general protein synthesis and led to cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase. We further showed that the combination of citreoviridin and the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib could improve the anticancer activity by enhancing ER stress, by ameliorating citreoviridin-caused cyclin D3 compensation, and by contributing to CDK1 deactivation and PCNA downregulation. More interestingly, the combined treatment triggered lethality through unusual non-apoptotic caspase- and autophagy-independent cell death with a cytoplasmic vacuolization phenotype. The results imply that by boosting ER stress, the combination of ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin and 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib could potentially be an effective therapeutic strategy against breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. More than 235 000 patients are diagnosed with breast cancer annually in the United States, and approximately 40 000 women are expected to die from the disease in 2014.1, 2 Treating breast cancer with a combination of treatment options, such as hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, and targeted therapies aims to provide clinical benefits, to improve patients' quality of life, and to minimize side effects. However, an increase in the number of unresponsive and resistant cases for standard treatments, including aromatase inhibitors, estrogen receptor antagonists, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted monoclonal antibody, and taxane chemotherapies, has been reported.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Therefore novel therapeutic biomarkers and new treatment options that overcome resistance are needed.

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthase is a membrane-associated protein complex comprising two sectors: the water-soluble catalytic sector (F1) with the subunit composition α3β3γδɛ, and the membrane-bound proton-translocating sector (Fo) with the subunit composition ab2c10–15.8, 9 ATP synthase catalyzes the phosphorylation of adenosine diphosphate to ATP through the proton-motive force generated by the electron transport chain (ETC) in energy-transducing membranes.10, 11, 12 ATP synthase is predominantly located on the membranes of mitochondria, bacteria, and chloroplast thylakoids. Recent studies have shown that ATP synthase is present on the plasma membrane (PM) of highly proliferating cell types in eukaryotes, including cancer cells,13, 14 endothelial cells,15, 16 keratinocytes,17 adipocytes,18 and hepatocytes.19

Previously, we demonstrated that an ATP synthase inhibitor causes cytotoxicity to breast cancer and lung cancer cells but not to normal cells,13, 14 suggesting that the ATP synthase inhibitor may be a potential drug for breast cancer therapy. To further understand the effects of the ATP synthase inhibitor on breast cancer cells, we performed proteomics approaches to investigate the differential expression profiles of breast cancer cells in response to ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin.

Citreoviridin is a toxic metabolite isolated from molds of the genera Penicillium and Aspergillus.20 Citreoviridin contains α-pyrone, a six-membered cyclic unsaturated ester that binds to the ATP synthase β subunit and causes toxicity to bacteria.21, 22 In the present study, we used citreoviridin to treat cancer cells and revealed the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) upon drug treatment.

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is responsible for protein folding, lipid and sterol biosynthesis, and intracellular calcium storage.23 Perturbations in ER homeostasis result in UPR by activating three ER-resident transmembrane transducers: inositol-requiring protein-1 (IRE1), protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6).24, 25, 26, 27, 28 Subsequently, phosphorylated PERK further phosphorylates Ser51 on the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) and leads to general inhibition of translation and cell cycle arrest, thus preventing further influx of nascent proteins into the ER lumen.29 Simultaneously, dimerization and autophosphorylation of IRE1 and cleavage of ATF6 in the Golgi result in the gene expression of protein chaperones and components of the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) machinery.30

On the basis of cellular responses to ER stress, we intended to intensify cell death signaling by inducing the UPR and by inhibiting ERAD with citreoviridin and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, respectively. Consequently, we revealed the prompting of cytoplasmic vacuolization, which implies induction of a novel type of methuosis-like cell death.

Results

ATP synthase was ectopically expressed on the PM of mammary cancer cells

To explore the ectopic expression of ATP synthase, we performed immunocytochemical tests on three breast cancer cell lines (i.e., MCF7, T47D, and MDA-MB-231) and non-oncogenic breast cells MCF10A. We observed punctate localization of ectopic ATP synthase on the PM of cancer cells but not on MCF10A cells (Figure 1a). Furthermore, the expression of ATP5B was observed in the PM fraction in MCF7, T47D, and MDA-MB-231 cells (Supplementary Figure S1). These results suggest that the specific expression of ectopic ATP synthase on cancer cells might be a potential drug-targeting signature for breast cancer.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

ATP synthase and ETC complexes were ectopically expressed on the PM of breast cancer cells. (a) 2 × 104 breast cancer cells (MCF7, T47D, and MDA-MB-231) or non-tumorigenic breast cells (MCF10A) were seeded onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips. Cells were incubated with antibody-probing ATP synthase β subunit (upper) or with whole ATP synthase complex (lower). (b) MCF7 cells were incubated with antibody-probing ETC complex proteins NDUFB4, SDHA, UQRC2, COX5, or ATP synthase under permeable or nonpermeable conditions. Cells were subjected to labeling with anti-mouse IgG-Alexa488 (green) and then stained with nuclear DAPI (blue). Bars represent 10 μm

ETC complex proteins were ectopically expressed on the PM of MCF7 cells

To further investigate whether ETC was also ectopically expressed on the PM, we applied antibody-probing selected proteins from complexes I to IV to monitor the extracellular and mitochondrial distribution of the ETC and ATP synthase. We revealed the ectopic expression of complexes I–IV on the PM, but the complexes varied in pattern and size (Figure 1b). All of the ectopic expression in the non-permeable group was punctated, distinct from the network-like distribution in the permeable mitochondrial group, implying the ectopic ETC and ATP synthase might cluster at specific membrane structure of the PM.

ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin inhibited proliferation of mammary cancer cells

To examine the inhibitory efficacy of citreoviridin against cell proliferation, we utilized a real-time cell analyzer to monitor cell responses to the drug over time. The results indicate that citreoviridin was cytotoxic to breast cancer cells MCF7, T47D, and MDA-MB-231 but not to the non-tumorigenic MCF10A (Figure 2). To evaluate the effect of citreoviridin on mitochondria, we examined the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) after 48-h treatment in MCF7 cells whose proliferation was inhibited by citreoviridin mostly. The result exhibited that the MMP was not affected during the course of the treatment (Supplementary Figure S2), implying the use of citreoviridin at the present dosage and treatment duration would at least not cause damages in mitochondrial function.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Citreoviridin inhibited cell proliferation of ectopic ATP synthase expressed on breast cancer cells. Real-time growth of (a) MCF7, (b) T47D, (c) MDA-MB-231, and (d) MCF10A cells after drug treatment was measured at hourly intervals for 48 h (x axis) by using the RTCA system. The normalized cell index (y axis) is presented as the mean±S.D.

Citreoviridin altered protein expression involving regulation of the cell cycle and ubiquitin-dependent protein modification

To determine the effects of citreoviridin on global protein expression, we utilized two-dimensional electrophoresis coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. We found that 15 proteins were differentially expressed after 24 and 48 h of citreoviridin treatment, with protein pI values ranging from 4 to 7 and from 3 to 10 (Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Table S1). Among the 15 identified proteins, 14 were significantly enriched in the protein–protein interaction (P=6.12 × 10−6) compared with 3.16 expected interactions within the genome background (Supplementary Figure S4). To analyze the major biological processes in which the identified proteins were involved, we applied gene ontology enrichment analysis. The analysis revealed that the most enriched biological processes were cell cycle phase transition (P=2.96 × 10−6), intracellular signaling (P=3.43 × 10−6), protein modification (P=6.57 × 10−6), regulation of apoptotic cell death (P=9.99 × 10−6), proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism (P=1.52 × 10−5), response to unfolded proteins (P=1.65 × 10−4), and ER-associated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism (P=4.09 × 10−4).

Citreoviridin arrested cell cycle progression in the G0/G1 phase

Functional enrichment analysis of proteomic data indicated that citreoviridin might regulate cell cycle progression. To verify this effect, we analyzed the DNA content distribution in response to citreoviridin by flow cytometry. The results show that citreoviridin significantly led to an accumulation of DNA content in the G0/G1 phase from 56.21% to 72.34% after 48-h treatment in MCF7 but not in MCF10A (Figures 3a and b). Molecular evidence also indicates that citreoviridin augmented the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CKI) p21, reduced the protein expression of the G0/G1 cell cycle regulators cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and cyclin D1, and contributed to a decrease in retinoblastoma protein (Rb) phosphorylation in a time-dependent manner (Figure 3c), suggesting the inhibition of entry into the S phase in the cell cycle.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Citreoviridin caused cell cycle arrest in the Go/G1 phase. Cells were treated with 0.1 μM citreoviridin for 48 h and then subjected to DNA content analysis. (a) DNA content was measured by using fluorescence-activated cell sorter, and the phase distribution was quantified with model fitting using ModFit. (b) Percentages were representative of cell cycle distributions from three replicate experiments in MCF7 (top) and MCF10A (bottom) cells. (c) MCF7 cells treated with 0.1 μM citreoviridin were harvested at the indicated time points and analyzed by western blotting. Expression of each detected protein was normalized to the signal of the actin level at 0 h

Citreoviridin triggered UPR and PERK-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation

The functional enrichment analysis also emphasized the involvement of proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism, response to unfolded proteins, and ER-associated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism. In response to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER, cells activate the UPR to cope with the unfolded proteins. This occurs by inhibition of protein synthesis and by increasing chaperones and redox proteins to assist protein folding through a series of signaling from the ER lumen. We revealed that citreoviridin induced the UPR by triggering the protein expression or phosphorylation of PERK, eIF2α, IRE1α, and Ero1-Lα (Figure 4a). We further demonstrated that small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of PERK alleviated eIF2α phosphorylation (Figure 4b), implying that PERK activation mediates induction of eIF2α phosphorylation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Citreoviridin triggered UPR- and PERK-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation. (a) Proteins from MCF7 cells treated with 0.1 μM citreoviridin (+) or DMSO vehicle control (−) for 48 h were analyzed by western blotting. Expression of each detected protein was normalized to the signal of the actin level and the DMSO control. Phosphorylation of eIF2α was normalized to the total eIF2α level. (b) MCF7 cells were treated for 36 h with PERK (P) knockdown by siRNA or with a scrambled control (C) before treatment with 0.1 μM citreoviridin (Citreo) or DMSO for 24 h. Expression of each detected protein was normalized to the signal of the actin level and of the cells transfected with the siRNA control and treated with DMSO

Combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib suppressed cell proliferation and anchorage-dependent and -independent colony-forming ability

To verify whether augmentation of ER stress by induction of UPR and inhibition of ERAD could intensify the cell death signal, we combined citreoviridin, which triggered the UPR we presented previously (Figure 4), and the proteasome-specific inhibitor bortezomib and measured their combined efficacy. The results show that citreoviridin and bortezomib exhibited an additive effect on MCF7 cell growth, with a combination index of 0.97 at 48-h co-treatment (Figure 5a). Additionally, we demonstrated that combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib reduced the colony-forming ability through anchorage-dependent and -independent routes (Figures 5b and c).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin exhibited an additive effect on cytotoxicity. (a) Real-time cell growth of MCF7 cells was measured after drug treatment (x axis) at hourly intervals for 48 h by using an RTCA system and expressed as a normalized cell index (y axis). Cells were treated with 0.1 or 0.2 μM citreoviridin (Citreo) in the presence or absence of 10 nM bortezomib (Btz). (b) Colony-formation assays were assessed through anchorage-dependent (left, ADG) or anchorage-independent (right, AIG) procedures, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Cells were treated with DMSO, 0.1 μM citreoviridin (Citreo), 10 nM bortezomib (Btz), or a combination of 0.1 μM Citreo and 10 nM Btz (Citreo+Btz). Colonies were grown in six-well plates and then stained with crystal violet. (c) The numbers of colonies of ADG in each well and AIG in each field per well were counted. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the control and treated group from three independent experiments (*P<0.01; **P<0.001)

Bortezomib decreased citreoviridin-caused cyclin D3 compensation and enhanced inhibition of entry into the S phase

Subsequently, we analyzed the effects of bortezomib and citreoviridin on cell cycle progression and found that the combined treatment caused elevated populations in both the G0/G1 and G2/M phases accompanied by a significant reduction in the S phase (Figures 6a–c). The cell cycle regulators phospho-Rb, CDK4, cyclin D1, phospho-CDK1, cyclin B1, Cdc25C, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were inhibited by citreoviridin alone and in combination with bortezomib (Figure 6d). We also revealed that the combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin inhibited citreoviridin-induced compensation of cyclin D3 and CDK6, thus preventing Rb phosphorylation and S-phase entry by decreasing PCNA expression (Figure 6d). We moreover found that citreoviridin alone and in combination with bortezomib augmented only p21, whereas p53 and p27 were unaltered, showing that these two CKIs were not involved in citreoviridin- or bortezomib-induced cell cycle arrest (Figure 6d).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin inhibited cell cycle progression through different cell cycle regulators. Cells treated with or without 0.1 μM citreoviridin (Citreo) and 10 nM bortezomib (Btz) for 48 h were subjected to cell cycle analysis or harvested for western blotting analysis. Cell cycles distributed in the (a) G0/G1, (b) S, and (c) G2/M phases were quantified. *P-values of <0.01 show that treatment effects differed significantly from those on the DMSO control. (d) Protein expression levels of the cell cycle regulators and CKIs from cells treated for 48 h were normalized to actin and DMSO (−/−) levels. For the phosphorylated form of the indicated proteins, the level of phosphorylation was further normalized to the total level of the given protein

The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhanced citreoviridin-induced UPR and cytoplasmic vacuolation

Next, we demonstrated that the combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib enhanced the UPR by increasing PERK, IRE1α, and calnexin expression, as well as eIF2α phosphorylation and protein ubiquitination (Figure 7a). As the treatment period advanced to 5 days, we observed that prolonged UPR caused massive cytoplasmic vacuolation in the combined and bortezomib treatments (Figure 7b). The number of formed cytoplasmic vacuoles was higher in the combined treatment compared with that in the treatment with single agent or vehicle control. The results suggest that the combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib might induce non-apoptotic cell death, as highlighted by the cytoplasmic vacuolation.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin enhanced the UPR, protein ubiquitination, and cytoplasmic vacuolation. (a) Cells treated with or without 0.1 μM citreoviridin (Citreo) and 10 nM bortezomib (Btz) for 48 h were harvested for western blotting analysis. Protein expression levels or total ubiquitinated protein (Ub) signals were normalized to actin and DMSO (−/−) levels, and the phosphorylated form of eIF2α was further normalized to the total eIF2α level. (b) Cells were seeded onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and then treated with the indicated drugs for 5 days. ER and nuclei were labeled with calnexin (green) and DAPI (blue), respectively. Bar represents 10 μm

Both purinergic receptor signaling and UPR but not calcium influx are involved in citreoviridin-caused cell death

To investigate the influences of purinergic receptor signaling and UPR on citreoviridin-inhibited cell proliferation, ATP and chemical chaperone were applied after and prior to drug treatment, respectively. Citreoviridin-inhibited proliferation was partially recovered by ATP posttreatment and tauroursodeoxycholic acid pretreatment (Supplementary Figure S5). The involvement of extracellular ATP on P2Y ATP-gated ion channel was further investigated. We utilized calcium indicator to monitor the kinetics of calcium influx and found that the addition of citreoviridin or bortezomib did not change the intracellular calcium (Supplementary Figure S6a) and affect the ATP-boosted calcium influx (Supplementary Figure S6b). This evidence suggests that citreoviridin and bortezomib did not regulate the PM calcium regulators or desensitize the ATP-induced calcium influx in 24-h treatment.

Combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin caused caspase-independent cell death

Next, we revealed that the combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib caused cleavage of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP), activation of caspase 7, decrease in B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2), and increase in Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) (Figure 8a). However, we did not observe the typical apoptotic phenotype including phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure (Supplementary Figure S7), nuclear condensation (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining in Figure 7b), and hypodiploid DNA content (Supplementary Figure S8), suggesting that the combined treatment did not cause apoptotic cell death. We then showed that cell death induced by citreoviridin and bortezomib was not prevented by co-incubation of MCF7 cells with the broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk or with caspase 3/7 inhibitor (Figure 8b). These results indicate that non-apoptotic cell death induced by the combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib is caspase independent.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin caused caspase- and autophagy- independent cell death. Cells treated with or without 0.1 μM citreoviridin (Citreo) and 10 nM bortezomib (Btz) for 48 h were harvested for western blotting analysis. Expression levels of (a) apoptosis-related proteins and (c) autophagy-related proteins were normalized to actin and DMSO (−/−) levels. The black arrowhead indicates cleaved PARP. For inducing autophagy, cells were pretreated with bafilomycin A1 (Baf A) to prevent the formation of autophagolysosome and starved in EBSS for 4 h to induce autophagy. (b) Cells were treated with 0, 1, 10, or 100 nM Btz or with 0, 0.01, 0.1, or 1 μM Citreo in the absence (i.e., DMSO only) or in the presence of 20 μM pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk or 10 μM caspase 3/7 inhibitor (inh). After 48-h incubation, cell viability was measured through the MTT assay. (d) Cells were incubated with 5 mM 3-MA for 4 h or 1 μM wortmannin (Wort) for 1 h prior to 0.1 μM Citreo, 10 nM Btz, or cotreatment. The cell viability was measured by the MTT assay and normalized to the DMSO vehicle control after 48-h treatment. (e) MCF7 cells were seeded on to poly-L-lysine-coated slide for 24 h. Cells were pretreated with 5 mM 3-MA for 4 h, 1 μM Wort for 1 h, or 100 nM Baf A for 1 h prior to 0.1 μM Citreo or 10 nM Btz treatment as indicated. After a 5-day treatment, cells were subjected to probing LC3B followed by corresponding red fluorescent Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody. Cell nucleus was stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; blue). White bar indicates 10 μm

Combination of bortezomib and citreoviridin caused autophagy-independent cellular vacuolization and cell death

The UPR is highly connected to autophagy owing to high demand of metabolism. To examine whether the citreoviridin and bortezomib caused cell death is mediated by autophagy, we detected the protein levels of major components sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta (LC3B) for autophagosome formation. The levels of SQSTM1 and LC3B were markedly induced by starvation in Earle's Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS), while only slightly affected by citreoviridin and bortezomib (Figure 8c). We also demonstrated that the citreoviridin- and bortezomib-induced cell death was not rescued by 3-methyladenine (3-MA) and wortmannin (Figure 8d), indicating that PI3K activity is not required for citreoviridin- and bortezomib-inhibited cell proliferation. Furthermore, both citreoviridin and bortezomib did not induce LC3 puncta in contrast to the incremental number of LC3 puncta when cells exposed to bafilomycin A1 (Figure 8e), indicating the treatment has no effect on autophagy. Our results also demonstrated that the formation of cellular vacuolation was not affected by pretreatment of PI3K inhibitors (Figure 8e), suggesting the citreoviridin- and bortezomib-caused cytoplasmic vacuolization is independent of PI3K-mediated autophagy.

Discussion

Ectopic ATP synthases on the surface of hepatocytes, endothelial cells, keratinocytes, and adipocytes have been revealed to regulate cholesterol uptake, angiogenesis, extracellular ATP signaling in wound healing, and preadipocyte differentiation, respectively.31, 32, 33, 34 The significance of ectopic ATP synthase in normal cells and cancer research has been emphasized in the past decades.13, 14, 15, 35, 36, 37 The expression of ectopic ATP synthase on cancer cells was first discovered in hematological cancer, the chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cells. It acts as a ligand for developing effectors of native natural killer and interleukin 2-activated killer cells in the cytolytic pathway.38 In the present study, we found first evidence that oxidative phosphorylation complexes, including F1Fo ATP synthase and ETC complexes, were ectopically expressed on the PM of breast cancer cells (Figure 1). The absence of ectopic ATP synthase on the non-tumorigenic breast epithelium cells MCF10A indicates the potent role of ectopic ATP synthase in targeted therapy. The ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin, which targets the ATP synthase β subunit and inhibits ATP synthesis activity, dramatically reduced proliferation of breast cancer cells and retained the viability of non-tumorigenic MCF10A cells (Figure 2). These results suggest that ectopic ATP synthase might be crucial for the proliferation of cancer cells. Cancer cells utilize glucose rapidly and efficiently to support their unlimited growth and to develop intense switches and alterations in fundamental metabolism. Whether ectopic expression of mitochondrial proteins on the PM is involved in the dysregulation of tumor metabolism and bioenergetics in mitochondria remains unclear.

Accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER, nutrient deprivation, calcium imbalance, oxidative stress, metabolic alterations, and environmental acidity activate UPR signaling to enable adaptation to perturbations and to relieve ER stress.39 Citreoviridin inhibited cell proliferation, reduced colony formation, and caused cell cycle arrest by inducing the UPR (Figures 2,3,4). This suggests the inhibition of cellular interruptions coupled to ectopic ATP synthase and therefore links the function of ectopic ATP synthase to the regulation of metabolic homeostasis in cancer cells.

As a double-edged sword, activation of UPR can lead to conflicting consequences for tumorigenesis.40 In response to the initial expansion of the tumor population, the UPR activates cytoprotective signaling pathways that alleviate ER stress and enhance the folding capacity to cope with excess protein production and an extreme redox environment.40 Angiogenesis is thus stimulated by inadequate nutrients and oxygen and is potentiated by UPR-modulated hypoxia-induced factor-1 to activate the vascular endothelial growth factor.41, 42 However, prolonged UPR ultimately induces cell death associated with ER stress, typically through apoptosis dependent on or independent of C/EBP homologous protein to remove overstressed cells.43 As the ER stress response has both protective and destructive elements, fully characterizing which branches and downstream components of the UPR are activated in tumors is essential.40

In parallel with the attenuation of translation and increase in chaperons, UPR signaling also activates ERAD by using the 26S proteasome for degradation of unfolded proteins. Results of our proteomic analysis showed that the identified 26S protease regulatory subunit 7 was downregulated in citreoviridin-treated cells (Supplementary Table S1). The 26S proteasome system that degrades ubiquitinated proteins in an ATP-dependent manner is composed of 20S stacked core rings and 19S regulatory particles.44 PSMC2, a part of the 19S regulatory complex, is responsible for degrading ubiquitinated substrates into the 20S proteasome, and its expression is essential for 19S and 26S proteasome assembly.44, 45 Therefore, the decrease in the 26S protease regulatory subunit 7 reduced proteasome activity and sensitized the cancer cells toward cell death.44, 46

As citreoviridin induced UPR, caused cell cycle arrest, and reduced cell proliferation but did not cause cell death, we then aimed to strengthen the inhibitory efficacy by testing a combined treatment. We hypothesized that irreversible ER stress could switch from signaling pathways orchestrated by cellular adaption to a dead end. To explore the role of ER stress in anticancer therapy, we combined the UPR-inducing ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin and the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Both UPR signaling and cell cycle regulators were affected by the combined treatment.

To understand the regulation of the combined treatment on cell cycle progression, we examined the expression of cell cycle regulators in G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases. Combination with bortezomib inhibited the citreoviridin-induced compensation of cyclin D3/CDK6, preventing Rb phosphorylation and S-phase entry by decreasing PCNA expression (Figure 6). CDK1/cyclin B acted as the M-phase promoting factor controlling the onset of mitosis. The activity of CDK1/cyclin B is controlled by the level and localization of cyclin B and by the regulatory phosphorylation of CDK1.47, 48 Activation of CDK1/cyclin B is precisely regulated by its two feed-forward loops, namely, dephosphorylation of phosphorylated phosphatase Cdc25C and inhibition of Wee1 kinase.49 CDK1 is inactivated by Tyr15 and Thr14 phosphorylation of Wee1 and is activated by Cdc25C through dephosphorylation of Tyr15 and phosphorylation of Thr161.50 Here we demonstrated that induction of phosphorylation on Thr161 and Tyr15 of CDK1 and the expression of cyclin B and Cdc25C were diminished in response to the combined treatment compared with bortezomib alone. This result is similar to that of the citreoviridin treatment (Figure 6d) and accounts for the observation of accumulated populations in both G2/M and G0/G1 phases in response to combined treatment (Figures 6a and c).

Excessive ER stress leads to apoptotic cell death.51 Our results indicate that prolonged ER stress caused cell toxicity (Figure 5a), inhibited colony formation (Figure 5b), induced cleavage of PARP and caspase 7 (Figure 8a), and decreased the Bcl2/Bax ratio (Figure 8a), suggesting the triggering of apoptosis. However, typical apoptotic phenotypes, including nucleus condensation (Figure 7b), an increase in the sub-G1 population in cell cycle due to DNA fragmentation (Supplementary Figure S4), and exposure of PS on the cell surface (Supplementary Figure S3), did not occur. Furthermore, we observed that the combined treatment caused unconventional cytoplasmic vacuolation (Figure 7b), and caspase- and autophagy- independent cell death (Figure 8), implying that a novel type of cell death occurred. Methuosis, a novel form of non-apoptotic cell death characterized by the accumulation of vacuoles derived from macropinosomes and endosomes, was discovered and defined by Overmeyer et al.52 in 2008. Our findings in the combination treatment leading to cytoplasmic vacuolation were consistent with the morphology of glioblastoma cells overexpressing constitutive-activated RAS, which leads to methuosis. These indicate that the combination of citreoviridin and bortezomib induced methuosis-like cell death. Recently, numerous adaptive mechanisms of ER stress-induced autophagy, a process regulating homeostasis of cellular nutrients by protein and organelle turnover, have been found to contribute to the development of oncogenic properties, drug resistance in cancer therapy, and pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases.24, 53 Furthermore, a quantitative proteomics study demonstrated that the in vivo anticancer activity of citreoviridin was due to the glucose metabolism switch,54 suggesting that citreoviridin-induced UPR might be involved in glucose metabolism.55, 56 Whether a relationship exists between ER stress and macropinocytosis leading to methuosis remains unknown.

In addition to ERAD, the activated UPR stimulate autophagy.1 Protein quality control is governed by two main processes: proteasomal degradation and autophagy.57, 58 Inhibition of proteasome degradation by bortezomib therefore forced the escalation of autophagy flux (Figure 8c), which is consistent with previous findings in myelomas.59, 60, 61 However, the use of autophagy inhibitors could not confer the citreoviridin- and bortezomib-caused cytotoxicity or cytoplasmic vacuolization (Figures 8d and e), suggesting the elevated autophagy is a minor effect along with the drug treatment. Furthermore, the perinuclear distribution of LC3B was not colocalized with the enlarged vacuoles (Figure 8e), indicating the cellular vacuolization is independent of formation of autophagosome.

In summary, our findings highlight that ectopic oxidative phosphorylation complexes are present on the PM and that ectopic ATP synthase could serve as a potential anticancer target. Our results show that the ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin could inhibit cancer cell proliferation by cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase through activation of the UPR. An increase in ER stress caused by the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, which blocks ERAD, and citreoviridin, which targets ectopic ATP synthase, eventually resulted in non-apoptotic cell death combined with severe cytoplasmic vacuolation. With the aid of pharmaceutical proteomics and protein–protein interaction network analysis, we obtained evidence that combined therapy of inhibitors targeted collective pathways that were functionally integrated. This finding suggests that application of the combined therapy might influence diverse cellular responses and produce a coordinated outcome.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

The human breast cancer cell lines MCF7 (ATCC, HTB-22), T47D (ATCC, HTB-133), and MDA-MB-231 (ATCC, HTB-26), and the mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A (ATCC, CRL-10317) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). MCF7, T47D, and MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel). MCF10A cells were grown in MEBM (Lonza, Baltimore, MD, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 5 mg/l insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 5 mg/l hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10 μg/l human epidermal growth factor (Sigma-Aldrich). All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2 and routinely passaged at 85–90% confluence. All cells were free of mycoplasma, as determined through a PCR-based mycoplasma detection method (MBI Fermentas, St Leon-Rot, Germany).

Drug treatment

The ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Biovision, Mountain View, CA, USA) were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare a 20 mM stock solution and which was then freshly diluted in medium to specified concentrations. Control samples were treated with the same volume of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich). The final concentration of DMSO in the medium was 0.1%. All procedures, including drug preparation and treatment, were carried out in the dark. Wortmannin (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and bafilomycin A1 (Cayman Chemical Co.) were dissolved in DMSO to 1 mM stock. Five molar stock of 3-MA (Cayman Chemical Co.) was freshly prepared before use in 55 °C sterile deionized water. For inhibiting autophagy, cells were pretreated with 5 mM 3-MA for 4 h or 1 μM wortmannin for 1 h to block the PI3K activity or 100 nM bafilomycin A1 for 1 h to prevent proceeding of late autophagy. For inducing autophagy, cells pretreated with 100 nM bafilomycin A1 for 1 h were incubated in EBSS (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) for 4 h subsequently.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cells (5 × 104) were seeded on a glass coverslip that was coated with 0.1% poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) and then allowed to adhere overnight. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, washed three times with PBS, and incubated with 5% BSA in PBS for 30 min to block the non-specific binding of antibodies. For detecting the mitochondrial localized proteins, cells were permeablized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and washed three times with PBS before the blocking step. Cells were subsequently incubated with the monoclonal antibody-probing NDUFB4 (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA), SDHA (Abcam Inc.), UQCRC2 (Abcam Inc.), COX5A (Abcam Inc.), ATP synthase β (Abcam Inc.), ATP synthase complex (Abcam Inc.), and calnexin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 4 °C overnight or/and LC3B (Cell Signaling Technology) at 37 °C for 3 h. After the cells were washed three times with PBS, they were incubated with secondary anti-mouse IgG-Alexa 488 (Invitrogen) or anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa 555 (Invitrogen) for 30 min in the dark. The cells were then washed three times with PBS. The immunostained cells were incubated with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min in the dark. Subsequently, they were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen) and examined under a fluorescence microscope using a Leica HCX FL PLAN 100 × 1.25 OIL objective (Leica Lasertechnik, Heidelberg, Germany).

Real-time measurement of cell growth and 3-(4,5-cimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay

The xCELLigence real-time cell analyzer (RTCA) System from Roche Applied Science (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used in label-free, continuous monitoring of cell proliferation after citreoviridin treatment, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells (1 × 104 per well) were seeded on a RTCA plate, cultured in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, and continuously monitored with the xCELLigence DP system. Approximately 24 h after cell seeding, cells in the exponential growth phase were treated with various concentrations of citreoviridin. The cell response to the citreoviridin treatment was monitored continuously for up to 48 h. Mean and S.D. values for each concentration and combination were imported into the Calcusyn software (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO, USA) to perform the combination index simulations and to analyze the synergy at different dosage levels, where combination index <1 indicates synergy and >1 indicates antagonism. For the MTT assay, 1 × 104 cells were plated in 96-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. The medium was then discarded, and the cells were pretreated with 20 mM Z-VAD-fmk (a pan-caspase inhibitor) or with freshly prepared 10 mM caspase 3/7 inhibitor for 1 h. Treatment with citreoviridin and bortezomib at the indicated combinations and concentrations was performed for a further 48 h. To investigate the involvement of autophagy, cells were pretreated with 5 mM 3-MA for 4 h or 1 μM wortmannin for 1 h prior to 48-h incubation of 0.1 μM citreoviridin, 10 nM bortezomib, or cotreatment. Cell survival was measured through the MTT assay, as described previously.13 The percentage of viability refers to the MTT value for 0.1% DMSO-treated cells.

Cell cycle analysis

Cells were trypsinized and fixed overnight with 70% ethanol at −20 °C. They were incubated with 50 μg/ml RNase A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Propidium iodide (10 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added, and the DNA content of the cells was analyzed on a FACSCanto instrument (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The percentages of cells in different phases of the cell cycle were measured by using ModFit (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA).

Protein extraction

The cells were harvested and dissolved in lysis buffer containing 7 M urea (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), 2 M thiourea, 4% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) (JT Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), and 0.002% bromophenol blue (Amersco, Solon, OH, USA). The mixture was sonicated for 2 min on ice in 0.6 on/0.4 off cycle per seconds with an ultrasonic probe (Labsonic M; Sartorius, Tagelswangen, Switzerland). The lysates were centrifuged at 12 000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected, and protein concentrations were determined by using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The protein samples were stored at −80 °C until use.

Western blotting

Proteins were separated on SDS polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to polyvinyldifluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 and then incubated with antibody-probing-specific antigens. Antibody-probing PERK, IRE1α, BiP, Ero1-Lα, PDI, phospho-eIF2α, eIF2α, cyclin D1, cyclin D3, CDK6, cleaved caspase 7, and LC3B were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies detecting cyclin B1, Cdc25C, p27, CDK4, PCNA, SQSTM1, and β-actin were obtained from GeneTex (Irvine, CA, USA). Phospho-Rb and Rb antibodies were obtained from Epitomics (Burlingame, CA, USA), and p53, p21, phospho-CDK1 (T161), and CDK1 antibodies were acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. After incubation with secondary antibodies, immunoblots were reacted with an ECL detection kit (Millipore), detected by a FluorChem M Multifluor System (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA), and then quantified by using the Kodak 1D Image Analysis software version 3.6 (Kodak, New Haven, CT, USA).

siRNAs and transfection

MCF7 cells (1 × 105) were incubated in six-well culture plates for 24 h before transfection. The confluency of the cells at the time of transfection was 30–50%. Cells were transfected with 80 pmol of the control or with PERK siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) with 7.5 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in serum-free DMEM according to the manufacturer's instructions. After transfection for 4 h at 37 °C, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS. After 36 h of transfection, cells were treated with 0.1% DMSO or with 0.1 μM citreoviridin. Cells were collected after 24 h of treatment and then stored at −80 °C until protein analysis.

Clonogenic assay and soft agar assay

For the clonogenic assay, cells were plated at a density of 2000 cells/well in six-well culture plates. After 24 h, cells were treated with either 0.1% DMSO or 0.1 μM citreoviridin, followed by an additional 10-day incubation to allow colony formation. Colonies were fixed and stained with 0.05% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich), washed to remove excess dye, and then imaged by a scanner (Scanjet 4500c, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Quantitative changes in clonogenicity were determined by counting the number of colonies. For the soft agar assay, a 2-ml mixture of complete DMEM and 0.7% low-melting-temperature agarose (Seaplaque: Lonza, Rockland, ME, USA) was added to a six-well tissue culture dish and then allowed to solidify (base agar). Next, a 2-ml mixture of complete DMEM and 0.35% agar containing 0.1 μM citreoviridin and 5000 cells was added to the top of the base layer; this layer was allowed to solidify (top agar). The cells were cultured for 20 days at 37 °C in an incubator with a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. At the end of the incubation, cell colony formation was assessed by a colorimetric assay using crystal violet. Colonies were photographed under × 40 magnification.

Statistical analyses

All data are presented as the mean±S.D. of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed by using unpaired two-tailed t-tests to compare the two groups. P-values that were <0.05 were considered significant.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Taiwan University Cutting-Edge Steering Research Project (NTU-CESRP-103R7602C3) and the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 102-2628-B-002-041-MY3, NSC 102-2627-B-002-002, NSC 102-2311-B-010-004, and MOST 103-2320-B-010-031-MY3). We thank the Technology Commons, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taiwan for assistance with the experiments.

Glossary

ATF6

activating transcription factor 6

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

Bax

Bcl-2-associated X protein

Bcl2

B-cell lymphoma 2

CDK

cyclin-dependent kinase

CKI

cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor

eIF2α

eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

ERAD

ER-associated degradation

ETC

electron transport chain

Ero1-Lα

ER-residing protein endoplasmic oxidoreductin-1-like α

IRE1

inositol-requiring protein-1

LC3B

microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta

MMP

mitochondrial membrane potential

PARP

poly ADP ribose polymerase

PCNA

proliferating cell nuclear antigen

PERK

protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase

PM

plasma membrane

PS

phosphatidylserine

SQSTM1

sequestosome 1

siRNA

small interfering RNA

UPR

unfolded protein response

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Disease website (http://www.nature.com/cddis)

Edited by M Campanella

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
Click here for additional data file. (3MB, doc)

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:52–62. doi: 10.3322/caac.21203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Perey L, Paridaens R, Hawle H, Zaman K, Nole F, Wildiers H, et al. Clinical benefit of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer and primary or acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors: final results of phase II Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Trial (SAKK 21/00) Ann Oncol. 2007;18:64–69. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shou J, Massarweh S, Osborne CK, Wakeling AE, Ali S, Weiss H, et al. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance: increased estrogen receptor-HER2/neu cross-talk in ER/HER2–positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:926–935. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berns K, Horlings HM, Hennessy BT, Madiredjo M, Hijmans EM, Beelen K, et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nahta R, Yu D, Hung M-C, Hortobagyi GN, Esteva FJ. Mechanisms of disease: understanding resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in human breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3:269–280. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Murray S, Briasoulis E, Linardou H, Bafaloukos D, Papadimitriou C. Taxane resistance in breast cancer: mechanisms, predictive biomarkers and circumvention strategies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:890–903. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pedersen PL, Ko YH, Hong S. ATP synthases in the year 2000: evolving views about the structures of these remarkable enzyme complexes. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2000;32:325–332. doi: 10.1023/a:1005594800983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pedersen PL, Amzel LM. ATP synthases. Structure, reaction center, mechanism, and regulation of one of nature's most unique machines. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:9937–9940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nakamoto R, Baylisscanlon J, Alshawi M. The rotary mechanism of the ATP synthase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;476:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pedersen PL. Transport ATPases into the year 2008: a brief overview related to types, structures, functions and roles in health and disease. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2008;39:349–355. doi: 10.1007/s10863-007-9123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hong S, Pedersen PL. ATP synthase and the actions of inhibitors utilized to study its roles in human health, disease, and other scientific areas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:590–641. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang TC, Chang HY, Hsu CH, Kuo WH, Chang KJ, Juan HF. Targeting therapy for breast carcinoma by ATP synthase inhibitor aurovertin B. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1433–1444. doi: 10.1021/pr700742h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang H-Y, Huang H-C, Huang T-C, Yang P-C, Wang Y-C, Juan H-F. Ectopic ATP synthase blockade suppresses lung adenocarcinoma growth by activating the unfolded protein response. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4696–4706. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moser TL, Stack MS, Asplin I, Enghild JJ, HØjrup P, Everitt L, et al. Angiostatin binds ATP synthase on the surface of human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:2811–2816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moser TL. Endothelial cell surface F1-FO ATP synthase is active in ATP synthesis and is inhibited by angiostatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6656–6661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131067798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Burrell HE. Human keratinocytes release ATP and utilize three mechanisms for nucleotide interconversion at the cell surface. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:29667–29676. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505381200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim B-W, Choo H-J, Lee J-W, Kim J-H, Ko Y-G. Extracellular ATP is generated by ATP synthase complex in adipocyte lipid rafts. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36:476–485. doi: 10.1038/emm.2004.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinez LO, Jacquet Sb, Esteve J-P, Rolland C, Cabezo'n E, Champagne E, et al. Ectopic beta-chain of ATP synthase is an apolipoprotein A-I receptor in hepatic HDL endocytosis. Nature. 2003;421:75–79. doi: 10.1038/nature01250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sakabe N, Goto T, Hirata Y. Structure of citreoviridin, a mycotoxin produced by penicillium citreo-viride molded on rice. Tetrahedron. 1977;33:3077–3081. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gause EM, Buck MA, Douglas MG. Binding of citreoviridin to the β subunit of the yeast Fl-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:557–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Linnett PE, Mitchell AD, Osselton MD, Mulheirn LJ, Beechey RB. Citreoviridin, a specific inhibitor of the mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase. Biochem J. 1978;170:503–510. doi: 10.1042/bj1700503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schröder M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;65:862–894. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7383-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim I, Xu W, Reed JC. Cell death and endoplasmic reticulum stress: disease relevance and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:1013–1030. doi: 10.1038/nrd2755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Frand AR, Cuozzo JW, Kaiser CA. Pathways for protein sidulphide bond formation. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:203–210. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01745-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma Y. ER chaperone functions during normal and stress conditions. J Chem Neuroanat. 2004;28:51–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rutkowski DT, Kaufman RJ. A trip to the ER: coping with stress. Trends in Cell Biol. 2004;14:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Benali-Furet NL, Chami M, Houel L, De Giorgi F, Vernejoul F, Lagorce D, et al. Hepatitis C virus core triggers apoptosis in liver cells by inducing ER stress and ER calcium depletion. Oncogene. 2005;24:4921–4933. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D. Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic reticulum resident kinase. Nature. 1999;397:271–274. doi: 10.1038/16729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schönthal AH. Pharmacological targeting of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85:653–666. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Martinez LO, Jacquet S, Esteve JP, Rolland C, Cabezón E, Champagne E, et al. Ectopic β-chain of ATP synthase is an apolipoprotein AI receptor in hepatic HDL endocytosis. Nature. 2003;421:75–79. doi: 10.1038/nature01250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Arakaki N, Nagao T, Niki R, Toyofuku A, Tanaka H, Kuramoto Y, et al. Possible role of cell surface H+-ATP synthase in the extracellular ATP synthesis and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:931–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Burrell HE, Wlodarski B, Foster BJ, Buckley KA, Sharpe GR, Quayle JM, et al. Human keratinocytes release ATP and utilize three mechanisms for nucleotide interconversion at the cell surface. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:29667–29676. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505381200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Arakaki N, Kita T, Shibata H, Higuti T. Cell-surface H+-ATP synthase as a potential molecular target for anti-obesity drugs. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3405–3409. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chi SL, Pizzo SV. Angiostatin is directly cytotoxic to tumor cells at low extracellular pH: a mechanism dependent on cell surface–associated ATP synthase. Cancer Res. 2006;66:875–882. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Scotet E, Martinez LO, Grant E, Barbaras R, Jenö P, Guiraud M, et al. Tumor recognition following Vγ9Vδ2 T cell receptor interactions with a surface F1-ATPase-related structure and apolipoprotein AI. Immunity. 2005;22:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang X, Gao F, Peng Y, Yin M, Ni J. Dual functions of a monoclonal antibody against cell surface F1F0 ATP synthase on both HUVEC and tumor cells1. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2008;29:942–950. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Das B, Mondragon M, Sadeghian M, Hatcher VB, Norin AJ. A novel ligand in lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity: expression of the beta subunit of H+ transporting ATP synthase on the surface of tumor cell lines. J Exp Med. 1994;180:273–281. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.1.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cao SS, Kaufman RJ. Unfolded protein response. Curr Biol. 2012;22:R622–R626. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ma Y, Hendershot LM. The role of the unfolded protein response in tumour development: friend or foe. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:966–977. doi: 10.1038/nrc1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pereira ER, Frudd K, Awad W, Hendershot LM. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and hypoxia response pathways interact to potentiate hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) transcriptional activity on targets like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) J Biol Chem. 2014;289:3352–3364. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.507194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang Y, Alam GN, Ning Y, Visioli F, Dong Z, Nör JE, et al. The unfolded protein response induces the angiogenic switch in human tumor cells through the PERK/ATF4 pathway. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5396–5406. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Woehlbier U, Hetz C. Modulating stress responses by the UPRosome: a matter of life and death. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36:329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Smith DM, Fraga H, Reis C, Kafri G, Goldberg AL. ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle. Cell. 2011;144:526–538. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaneko T, Hamazaki J, Iemura S-i, Sasaki K, Furuyama K, Natsume T, et al. Assembly pathway of the mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones. Cell. 2009;137:914–925. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nijhawan D, Zack TI, Ren Y, Strickland MR, Lamothe R, Schumacher SE, et al. Cancer vulnerabilities unveiled by genomic loss. Cell. 2012;150:842–854. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Porter LA, Donoghue DJ. Cyclin B1 and CDK1: nuclear localization and upstream regulators. Prog Cell Cycle Res. 2003;5:335–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Qian J, Winkler C, Bollen M. 4D-networking by mitotic phosphatases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25:697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Domingo-Sananes MR, Kapuy O, Hunt T, Novak B. Switches and latches: a biochemical tug-of-war between the kinases and phosphatases that control mitosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:3584–3594. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Potapova TA, Sivakumar S, Flynn JN, Li R, Gorbsky GJ. Mitotic progression becomes irreversible in prometaphase and collapses when Wee1 and Cdc25 are inhibited. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:1191–1206. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tabas I, Ron D. Integrating the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:184–190. doi: 10.1038/ncb0311-184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Overmeyer JH, Kaul A, Johnson EE, Maltese WA. Active ras triggers death in glioblastoma cells through hyperstimulation of macropinocytosis. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:965–977. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ma XH, Piao SF, Dey S, Mcafee Q, Karakousis G, Villanueva J, et al. Targeting ER stress–induced autophagy overcomes BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1406–1417. doi: 10.1172/JCI70454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu YH, Hu CW, Chien CW, Chen YJ, Huang HC, Juan HF. Quantitative proteomic analysis of human lung tumor xenografts treated with the ectopic ATP synthase inhibitor citreoviridin. PloS One. 2013;8:e70642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Scheuner D, Song B, McEwen E, Liu C, Laybutt R, Gillespie P, et al. Translational control is required for the unfolded protein response and in vivo glucose homeostasis. Mol cell. 2001;7:1165–1176. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00265-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Cairns RA, Harris IS, Mak TW. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:85–95. doi: 10.1038/nrc2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shaid S, Brandts C, Serve H, Dikic I. Ubiquitination and selective autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2012;20:21–30. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Suh DH, Kim MK, Kim HS, Chung HH, Song YS. Unfolded protein response to autophagy as a promising druggable target for anticancer therapy. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2012;1271:20–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06739.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Selimovic D, Porzig BB, El-Khattouti A, Badura HE, Ahmad M, Ghanjati F, et al. Bortezomib/proteasome inhibitor triggers both apoptosis and autophagy-dependent pathways in melanoma cells. Cell Signal. 2013;25:308–318. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Fang J, Rhyasen G, Bolanos L, Rasch C, Varney M, Wunderlich M, et al. Cytotoxic effects of bortezomib in myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia depend on autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation of TRAF6 and repression of PSMA1. Blood. 2012;120:858–867. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-407999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kawaguchi T, Miyazawa K, Moriya S, Ohtomo T, Che XF, Naito M, et al. Combined treatment with bortezomib plus bafilomycin A1 enhances the cytocidal effect and induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in U266 myeloma cells: crosstalk among proteasome, autophagy-lysosome and ER stress. Int J Oncol. 2011;38:643. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2010.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
Click here for additional data file. (3MB, doc)

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES