Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Sep 30;25(1):27–35. doi: 10.1111/pan.12546

Treating Perioperative Anxiety and Pain in Children: A Tailored and Innovative Approach

Michelle A Fortier a,b, Zeev N Kain a,b
PMCID: PMC4261033  NIHMSID: NIHMS627396  PMID: 25266082

Abstract

Summary

Millions of children undergo outpatient surgery in the United States each year; the overwhelming majority will experience significant perioperative anxiety and pain. Behavioral preparation programs focused on skills acquisition and modeling, considered essential for effective preparation, are no longer offered to most children and families in the outpatient surgery setting. Moreover, what little preparation does occur is typically generic in nature, rather than tailored to unique characteristics of the child and family. Untreated anxiety and pain have significant implications for children’s short- and long-term recovery and future interactions in the medical environment. The rapid growth of the World Wide Web and increasing access to Internet by families across the country provides an opportunity to develop tailored, Web-based behavioral preparation programs that can be accessed repeatedly at times convenient to the child and family, that include coping skills training and modeling, and that can provide unique output based upon child and parent characteristics known to impact perioperative pain and anxiety. In this review article we present a conceptual framework for a computer-based intervention that may transform the way we manage children and parents before and after surgery.

Keywords: Anxiety, outpatient surgery, patient-centered care, coping behavior, internet, pediatric psychology

The Challenge: Preoperative Anxiety

Every year many millions of children undergo anesthesia and surgery around the world. On the day of surgery, children and parents typically wait in a preoperative holding area and during this time period, children are fearful about the impending surgery, specifically around the anticipated separation from their parents and pain 1,2. Indeed, Kain et al reported that up to 60% of all young children undergoing anesthesia and surgery report significant anxiety1,2. The anxiety felt in the preoperative holding area is increased once children enter the operating room, where monitors are applied, a mask is held over the child’s face, and volatile anesthetics are administered. Occasionally the stress and fear are such that children wet themselves, and may attempt to escape from the healthcare providers 1,3,4. Indeed, up to 25% of young children who have not received sedative premedication or parental presence need to be forcefully held down during the induction of anesthesia 3.

In terms of the impact of preoperative anxiety, children who are highly anxious before surgery have been found to have a significantly higher postoperative pain, delayed hospital discharge, and higher incidence of emergence delirium, sleep disturbances, and other maladaptive behavioral changes that last up to a few weeks following surgery 5,6. Indeed, although emergence from anesthesia is uneventful for most children, about 12-18% of children develop emergence delirium (ED) 6. Although the etiology of emergence delirium is unclear it is likely related to specific drugs, pain, anxiety, and the temperament of the child 7. In fact, it is reported that child behavior during induction predicts the occurrence of ED 3 8. Studies from 40 years ago found that inpatient surgical experience could result in behavioral problems 9-11. Investigations that repeated earlier studies determined that up to 40% of children undergoing outpatient surgery still exhibit new onset maladaptive behavioral responses (e.g., nightmares and separation anxiety) at 1-2 weeks after surgery 1,5,12-14. Both the anxiety of the child and mother have been associated with the presence of postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes1,15.

Anxiety before surgery is inclusive to both children and their parents 1,16-20. Parental anxiety is important not only because it causes hardship to the parents but also because it is strongly related to child preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain 1,21. High parental anxiety is also related to the development of postoperative maladaptive behavior changes in children following surgery 1. Reducing parental anxiety has been shown to decrease preoperative anxiety in children 22 and most parents who participate in preoperative preparation programs display reduced anxiety on the day of surgery 1,16,17,23-27. Unfortunately, a recent survey study shows that at the current time the overwhelming majority of families in the United States (U.S.) receive no treatment for preoperative anxiety 28.

The Challenge: Postoperative Pain

Of the millions children who undergo surgery every year, the majority will experience significant pain in the hospital 29. At home, a similar picture emerges where most children are in pain while recovering at home immediately after surgery, and approximately one-third of children report significant pain that continues up to one week after surgery 13,14. Unfortunately, healthcare professionals underestimate postoperative pain in children 30. In 1983, Mather and Mackie reported that 31% of pediatric surgical patients were not given postoperative analgesics 31. Amazingly, 13-years later, the same rate of under treatment of postoperative pain was reported, 32,33 with a 2002 investigation finding that 51% of children continued to receive insufficient analgesics after surgery34. The under treatment of pain in the postoperative setting is particularly problematic given the impact of children’s early pain experiences. For instance, significant medical procedure distress in children has been linked years later to adults’ reports of pain and anxiety regarding medical events 35. In addition, early painful procedures have been associated with changes in sensitivity to later medical procedures 36. Recent findings have even demonstrated alterations in pain neuropathways as a result activation of the nociceptive system early in development 37. In addition to under treatment of pain in the hospital, children are also at risk of under medication at home by parents 38,39.

Given that the overwhelming majority of children’s surgery is now outpatient, parents at home now manage most postoperative pain. This is concerning as parents often under medicate their children’s pain, with up to 60% of parents administering less than the prescribed dose of analgesia following day surgery discharge 38,39. Although explanations for the suboptimal pain management provided by parents at home are not entirely clear, a recent study identified specific parental attitudes toward analgesia that impact medication administration after surgery40.

Perioperative Pain and Anxiety: Current Status

Modalities such as preoperative sedatives, parental presence during induction of anesthesia (PPIA), postoperative analgesics and behavioral preoperative preparation programs are available at the current time to help children to cope with perioperative pain and anxiety. Currently, only a minority of children receives a preoperative sedative to manage this anxiety, and an additional minority of children are accompanied to the operating room by their parents 41. A national survey conducted by our laboratory of more than 4000 anesthesiologists found that most young children in the U.S. are taken into the operating room alone without the use of either premedication or parents in the operating rooms 41. Reasons for this under treatment include cost-containment efforts and lack of understanding of the adverse sequelae of perioperative anxiety and pain as well as lack of evidence to the effectiveness of modalities such as behavioral preparation programs. Unlike sedatives, for example, the effectiveness of PPIA to reduce preoperative anxiety remains unproven when parents are not provided with education on their role and behavior in the operating room 42-47. The use of behavioral preparation programs for surgery, which were once very popular, has decreased significantly in U.S. A random survey of 59 hospitals in the U.S. found that over 90% of community hospitals had no surgical preparation programs and no child-life programs. In addition, even though 70% of childrens hospitals provided surgical preparation in the form of child life services for children undergoing inpatient surgery, just 20% of preparation programs occurred before the day of surgery. Outpatient preparation programs were characterized by very low participation rates (17-32%), due in part to the fact that about 80% of hospitals require a providers’ referral for participation and were available primarily for children with special needs. 28,48 [Kain et al. Anesthesiology 2006]. The fact that 80% of hospitals surveyed offer a shortened program delivered on the day of surgery just before the procedure is likely a result of the shift toward outpatient surgery and cost-containment efforts that discourage time-intensive behavioral interventions in hospitals. Unfortunately, a recent video-capture study found that anesthesiologists, surgeons, and nurses each spend less than 6 minutes on the day of surgery with outpatient children 49. Clearly, the rationale that day of surgery preparation can replace the traditional preparation programs that are conducted several days prior to the procedure is simply not valid. Finally, current preoperative preparation programs lack of information and training for parents in pain management, and parental patterns of insufficient analgesic administration. Furthermore, although behavioral interventions are important in the optimal management of postoperative pain, these interventions work best when children have had the opportunity to practice and build mastery in their use. Given that most surgeries today are conducted on an outpatient basis and little preparation is offered 50, children’s opportunities to learn and practice these pain reduction behavioral techniques are limited at the current time.

We conclude that a new conceptual framework is needed in order to adequately treat the phenomena of perioperative anxiety and pain. This framework should take into account that futurists predict that by 2015 about 90% of all pediatric surgery in the U.S. will be performed on an outpatient basis and as well as developments in technology and behavioral sciences.

Perioperative Pain and Anxiety: Preoperative Preparation Programs

Design Considerations

Most of the current preoperative preparation literature is dated in the late 1980’s and minimal innovation has occurred in this area over the past two decades. For example, preoperative preparation articles published in the anesthesia, surgery, and nursing literature since 2000 examine programs consisting of written information and modeling. These preparation concepts date back to the 1980’s, yet they are presented as “state of the artrr” 51-57. An editorial by Koinig deplored the expense of hospital-based preparation programs. The solution, he wrote, would be adapting “alternative methods” such as “written information leaflets” 52, despite the 1997 article that rated written information as the least effective form of preoperative preparation 58. A recent preparation program indicated the success of a strategy that included support by a psychologist throughout the surgical episode59. Clearly such a strategy is not viable in current real world healthcare settings. Other limitations of current preoperative preparation programs include:

  • Because these programs are physically located in hospitals, there is a high operational cost associated with them and parents need to take time off work to attend.

  • Most of these programs are generic in nature and conducted in groups and thus do not address variations across individuals.

  • Most preparation programs do not use maximally effective techniques such as enhanced coping skills because of their high expense. Rather, many resort to low-cost group lectures, written material, and operating room tours.

  • Most preparation programs prepare the child and parent for the “overall” perioperative process, not for specific components such as postoperative pain 28

  • Hospital-based preparation program are accessible only at one time point.

  • Most current preparation programs are not geared toward parents and do not provide enough perioperative information.

Considering the above limitation of current preoperative preparation programs we submit that future programs should include the following characteristics:

  • A future preoperative preparation program must be accessible. Access to the Internet has significantly increased all the around the world. The most recent Pew Internet survey conducted in 201460 showed that well over 90% of adults aged 18-49 years are Internet users. Moreover, a majority (80%) of adults who use the internet search for health topics and most households are able to access broadband Internet.

  • Surgical preparation programs need to be tailored based upon individual characteristics of children and parents. Tailored interventions are adapted to a specific individual’s situation, needs, and/or characteristics 61-67 and are therefore more complex than generic interventions. Tailoring of computer-based interventions is a technique that has become increasingly popular in healthcare 63,64,67-69. Computer tailoring can efficiently convey information to target medical topics including smoking 62, cancer screening 70, and nutrition 62,64,71,72.

  • Preparation for surgery for children and parents should be inexpensive and low in costs. That is, hospitals should have low operational costs associated with the program personnel, and parents should be able to access the preparation program during evening and weekends and not miss time at work.

  • The content of future preoperative preparation program should be evidence based rather than motivated by cost and individual biases. An early report suggested that the most effective components of surgical preparation were coping skills training and modeling (observation of targeted skills) 58. As this opinion is strongly supported by recent literature, coping skills and modeling should be the major components of any future preparation program for children and parents. In addition, key information that parents want to be given before the day of surgery should be included 73.

  • A future program should also be very much focused on pain management given that most parents under treat the pain of their children in the home setting. As the majority of surgery currently is conducted on an outpatient basis, this is of very high importance. Indeed a recent study found parent misconceptions regarding analgesic use for children to be prevalent, including fears of medication side effects, concerns that analgesic use would lead to addiction, and beliefs that analgesia works better when administered less frequently 40. These beliefs have been linked to the under treatment of children’s postoperative pain by parents74.

Structural Approach

We conclude that dramatic increase in access to the World Wide Web opens an alternative avenue for providing surgical preparation to children and families by developing an Internet-based intervention that families can access in the comfort of their own homes, multiple times prior to and after surgery, and that will integrate evidence-based treatments for improving postoperative pain management and reducing preoperative anxiety. Further, the Internet allows such an intervention to be tailored to empirically chosen characteristics of the child, parent and the surgical procedure. As we indicated above, a computer-based tailored intervention may represent an ideal approach to management of preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain for children undergoing surgery. Various experts define tailoring in different ways. For example, one of the early pioneers in this area, Kreuter and Skinner, defined tailoring “as any combination of information or change strategies intended to reach one specific person, based on the characteristics that are unique to that person, related to the outcome of interest, and have been derived from an individual assessment” 75. We further submit that a tailored intervention has to be developed while taking into account identification of specific barriers (e.g. why do individual parents under treat the pain of their child) and take action to overcome these barriers. Although tailored interventions can be incorporated into printed material, in more recent years the term “computer-tailoring” has vastly evolved. This new methodology is based on real-time assessment of patient input and selection of output content using data-driven decision rules (matrix). In this model, the tailored intervention is based upon three components, an intake (assessing the characteristics, needs and preference of the patient), a matrix (a rule-based decision support system that is based on the intake) and an output (which is directed at affecting the outcome of interest). With this conceptual framework in mind, we will develop for the reader the elements of a futuristic web based preoperative preparation program for children and their parents:

The Intake Component of Computer-Tailored Preoperative Preparation

As stated earlier, an initial step in designing and testing a tailored intervention is selecting individual characteristics on which the output component of the intervention will be tailored 76. Overall, it is well established that child variables (developmental abilities, temperament, coping style), family variables (parental trait anxiety, coping style, attitude toward pain), and the surgical procedure will affect the recovery of a child after surgery and thus should be taken into account when designing a particular preoperative precreation program77. As such, each of these variables needs to be examined:

  • Developmental abilities change dramatically as the child matures and there is very little in common between the 2-year old child and the 13-year old adolescent. As such we recommend as a first step to target the intervention toward a particular age group. Whereas conceptually, developmental ability of the child can affect the matrix and thus the output of a computer-based tailored intervention, in reality, the wide variation in developmental abilities will necessitate such a highly complex output that it would be prohibitive to develop. If a certain age group is to be chosen, we propose that an initial computer-based tailored intervention focus on younger children (2-5 years old) given it is well established they are significantly more vulnerable to anxiety during the perioperative period.

  • Child temperament is important to factor into a preoperative preparation program 2. Specifically, children high in negative emotionality show more anxiety on the day of surgery. It is notable that while the construct of negative emotionality includes several temperamental variables including anger, sadness, and fearfulness; fearfulness is the most relevant temperament marker for tailoring in the preoperative setting. Fearful temperament generally refers to the degree to which children respond with worry or unease to potentially threatening situations 78. Thus, children who are high in temperamental fearfulness are more likely to react with anxiety to the potentially threatening surgical environment and will benefit from thorough anxiety management interventions such as coping skills training and exposure 79. Moreover, fearful temperament may affect the outcomes of the intervention. For example, Kochanska and colleagues 80 demonstrated that the efficacy of parenting styles differed based on children’s fearful temperament. Children who are highly fearful are most likely to comply with directions and internalize parental messages when parents use “gentle, low power discipline” 80. In children with low fear however, this type of discipline is not effective as it does not generate enough anxiety in the child to facilitate compliance. High power discipline is also not effective for these children, as it may lead to anger rather than compliance. Instead of discipline techniques for low fearful children, Kochanska proposes capitalizing on positive emotions to generate compliance and internalization of parental messages.

  • Parental trait anxiety is a good predictor of parental state anxiety on the day of surgery 81. Further, data from our group suggest that parents who are high in anxiety respond differently to perioperative interventions than their low anxiety counterparts 82, specifically, those parents who are high in anxiety tend to respond less favorably to traditional preparation programs than those who are low in anxiety. This may be because most of the existing preparation programs provide information to parents about the process on the day of surgery, but do not teach specific skills for parents to manage their own anxiety. Given there are data within the procedural literature to suggest that teaching parents coping skills can decrease their own anxiety, these skills should be imparted to high anxiety parents in this program.

  • Parental coping will affect how they respond to preoperative preparation programs and this characteristic has been generally defined as volitional strategies used by individuals to modulate reactions in response to stress 83. Coping literature has differentiated between strategy and style models of coping that are somewhat akin to state and trait conceptualizations. Coping strategy (state) conceptualizations focus on specific techniques that individuals use to modulate stress (e.g., seeking out information) whereas coping style (trait) conceptualizations focus on the patterns by which individuals respond to stress. One coping style model that is particularly relevant to the current application is the Monitor/Blunter framework proposed by Miller and colleagues 84. This framework categorizes coping styles based on the degree to which individuals seek out and attend to health-related information and how they respond to this information. Individuals in the “monitor” category scan medical information for threatening cues 85 and respond with greater anxiety to health risks 86. Despite their anxious reactions, monitors desire and respond best to comprehensive information, particularly information that outlines means by which to reduce health risks 87. In contrast to “monitors”, “blunters” become distressed at detailed health-related information and may distract themselves as a means of avoiding this information 84. Therefore, efficient and direct information focused on benefits is preferable 87. Several studies have examined interventions tailored based on this monitor-blunter framework and have consistently shown that coping style-matched interventions are more effective than mismatched interventions 87-89.

  • Parental pain management attitudes have been associated with how well parents managed their children’s pain 40. For example, parents endorsed beliefs that using pain medication in childhood may lead to later drug abuse and that pain medication works best when used as little as possible. Education regarding pain management has been found to increase favorable attitudes in nurses 90 and videotaped interventions have been found to alter parents’ pain knowledge 91. Research on attitude change indicates that interventions targeted to specific attitudes are more effective than those that are presented in a more general way.

  • In addition to personality and attitude variables, it will be important for such a tailored intervention to include information on parental preferences for perioperative interventions. In particular, these include use of sedative premedication (e.g., midazolam) and parental presence at anesthesia induction (PPIA) 92. With regard to PPIA, parents may want to accompany their child to the operating room and parents who are prepared to enter the operating room are more effective at managing their children’s anxiety than those who are not prepared 93. Thus, such preparation will be provided as part of a newly developed intervention.

  • Different types of surgery will result in different perioperative experiences, especially in regard to the quality and intensity of postoperative pain. For example, tonsillectomy commonly results in significant pain in the recovery room and at home 94 whereas pain typically resolves quickly for procedures such as pressure equalizing tubes as well as inguinal hernia repair. Providing accurate expectations for postoperative recovery is important, particularly sensory aspects (i.e., pain) associated with the procedure 95.

The Matrix and Output Components of Computer-Tailored Preoperative Preparation

The decision process of a computer-based tailored intervention is based on real-time decision support and takes into account all the information that has been provided by the parent and child in the intake component. The output of such a program should be evidence based and could sequentially address each of the five temporal divisions of surgery: 1) Home prior to surgery; 2) Holding area; 3) Anesthesia induction and surgery; 4) Recovery room; and 5) Home following surgery. Each of these output modules should be included for both parents and children. The child component should make use of three strategies: information provision, modeling, and coping skills training that have been previously reported as ideal for preparing children for surgery. The child component should be ideally age-appropriate, animated, engaging, and accessible to 2 to 5 year old children. The parent component should include two concepts: information and coping skills education and practice. Use of multiple media formats (e.g., audio and visual) to provide parental information will increase engagement in the program. We recommend that in such a program parents and children will work together to complete the child component, ensuring that parents also learn children’s skills. In addition, “parent teaching” time should be built into the program.

Ideally, such a preparation program will provide information about the child and parent to anesthesiologists and nurses before the day of surgery. While completing the intake portion of the program, parents could be asked for personal information about their child (What is the child’s favorite cartoon character, what is the child’s favorite pastime). This information will then be shared with the clinician on the day before surgery. Clinicians will be able to use this information to quickly build rapport with the child on the day of surgery and may also be able to use this information to aid in distraction during anesthesia induction. Also, the clinicians should be informed of parents’ preferred coping styles (monitor or blunter), anxiety level (high or low), and children’s temperament (fearful or non-fearful). Accompanying these summaries should be tips for clinicians to tailor their day of surgery behavior to parents’ and children’s characteristics. For example, clinicians will be provided with instructions on how to interact with “monitor” parents such as “This parent will respond well to detailed information on the process of surgery. They will appreciate a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of the procedure and reassurance about measures taken to reduce risks. This parent will also benefit from a thorough discussion of expectations for the postoperative course of recovery.”

Technical Considerations

No discussion on an ideal computer based tailored intervention directed at preparing the child and parent for surgery would be complete without a discussion of some of the technical aspects. Ideally, for the age group involved, an animation company with significant web design abilities should be chosen. Custom characters designed for this program will be stewards through the virtual experience. The main character who will navigate the child through the intervention should be neutral in gender, age, and ethnicity so that any child can relate to and bond with it as a new friend. The intervention should teach the child about the perioperative process so he or she knows what to expect, understand the roles of the health care providers who will be involved in the surgical process, and learns strategies to manage anxiety. Presenting clear information in a fun way will keep the child engaged to maximize the effectiveness of content. Security consideration should include a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) certificate allowing for 128bit encryption between client and server transactions. Participants can be assigned user names that will not be associated with their real names. All data can be stored and accessed in accordance with HCFA’s Security Policy and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). Multiple, redundant layers of firewall system will also protect secure data. Risk minimization strategies summarized by NIMH (Internet based Research Intervention Chart, October 2003) should be implemented.

Conclusion

The Internet and the World Wide Web are markedly changing our society and we suggest that the future of treating perioperative anxiety in pain in children capitalize on this medium to transform the way we manage children and parents before and after surgery. In this article we presented a conceptual framework for a computer-based intervention that is aimed to treat perioperative anxiety and pain in children. Our research center has been funded by the National Institute of Health to develop such an intervention (WebTIPS) and are in the process of providing data to support its efficacy with hopes to disseminate such a program to hospitals across the country.

Acknowledgments

FUNDING

The intervention (WebTIPS) mentioned at the end of this manuscript was funded by the National Institute of Health (HD056104).

Footnotes

ETHICS

This manuscript did not require any ethical approvals.

DISCLOSURES

No authors have any conflicts to disclose.

References

  • 1.Kain ZN, Mayes LC, O’Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adol Med. 1996;150(12):1238–1245. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170370016002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kain Z, Mayes L, Borestein M, Genevro J. Anxiety in children during the perioperative period. In: Anonymous, editor. Child Development and Behavioral Pediatrics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Mahwah, NJ: 1996. pp. 85–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kain Z, Mayes L, Caramico L, Hofstadter M. Distress During Induction of Anesthesia and Postoperative Behavioral Outcomes. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1042–1042. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burton L, Verma V. Anxiety relating to illness and treatment. In: Anonymous, editor. Anxiety in Children. 1st. Methuen Croom Helm; New York: 1984. pp. 151–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kain ZN. Postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes in children: incidence, risks factors and interventions. [Review] [51 refs] Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica. 2000;51(4):217–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews A, Maranets I, et al. Preoperative anxiety, emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors: are they related? A new conceptual framework. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004 Dec;99(6):1648–1654. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136471.36680.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2003;96(6):1625–1630. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000062522.21048.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, et al. Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004 Dec;99(6):1648–1654. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136471.36680.97. table of contents. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vernon DT, Schulman JL, Foley JM. Changes in children behavior after hospitalization. Am J Dis Child. 1966;111:581–581. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1966.02090090053003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vernon D. Use of modeling to modify children’s responses to a natural, potentially stressful situation. J Applied Psychol. 1973;58(3):351–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vernon DTA, Bigelow DA. Effect of information about a potentially stressful situation on responses to stress impact. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1974;29(1):50–59. doi: 10.1037/h0035711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kotiniemi L, Ryhanen P. Behaviourial changes and children’s memories after intravenous, inhalation and rectal induction of anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6:201–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.1996.tb00429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT, Moilanen IK. Behavioural changes in children following day-case surgery: a 4-week follow-up of 551 children. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(10):970–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.202-az0337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT, Valanne J, Jokela R, Mustonen A, Poukkula E. Postoperative symptoms at home following day-case surgery in children: a multicentre survey of 551 children. Anaesthesia. 1997 Oct;52(10):963–969. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.203-az0338.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA, et al. Sleeping characteristics of children undergoing outpatient elective surgery .[see comment] Anesthesiology. 2002 Nov;97(5):1093–1101. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Litman R, Berger A, Chhibber A. An evaluation of preoperative anxiety in a population of parents of infants and children undergoing ambulatory surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6:443–443. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1996.d01-17.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cassady JF, Jr., Wysocki TT, Miller KM, Cancel DD, Izenberg N. Use of a preanesthetic video for facilitation of parental education and anxiolysis before pediatric ambulatory surgery [see comments] Anesth Analg. 1999;88(2):246–250. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199902000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shirley P, Thompson N, Kenward M, Johnston G. Parental anxiety before elective surgery in children. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:956–956. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thompson N, Irwin M, Gunawardene W, Chan L. Pre-operative parental anxiety. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:1008–1008. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb14992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Snaith R, Bridge G, Hamilton M. The Leeds scale for self assessment of anxiety and depression. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1976;128:156–156. doi: 10.1192/bjp.128.2.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kain Z, Mayes L, Caramico L, Weisman S, Hofstadter M. Social Adaptability and Other Personality Characteristics as Predictors for Childrenââ,¬â,¢s Reactions to Surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2001;12:549–549. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00214-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang SM, Maranets I, Weinberg ME, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Kain ZN. Parental auricular acupuncture as an adjunct for parental presence during induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1399–1404. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pinto RP, Hollandsworth JG., Jr Using videotape modeling to prepare children psychologically for surgery: influence of parents and costs versus benefits of providing preparation services. Health Psychology. 1989;8(1):79–95. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.8.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Robinson PJ, Kobayashi K. Development and evaluation of a presurgical preparation program. Journal of pediatric psychology. 1991;16(2):193–212. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/16.2.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wolfer JA, Visintainer MA. Pediatric surgical patients’ and parents’ stress responses and adjustment as a function of psychologic preparation and stress-point nursing care. Nursing Research. 1975;24(4):244–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karl HW, Pauza KJ, Heyneman N, Tinker DE. Preanesthetic preparation of pediatric outpatients: the role of a videotape for parents. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 1990;2(3):172–177. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90093-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kain Z, Caramico L, Mayes L, Genevro J, Bornstein M, Hofstadter M. Preoperative preparation programs in children: A comparative study. Anes Analg. 1998;87:1249–1249. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199812000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kain Z, Wang S, Caldwell-Andrews A, Yaffa Zisk R, Mayes L. Pre-surgical preparation programs for children undergoing outpatient surgery: Current Status; Paper presented at: American Society of Anesthesiology; Chicago, IL. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cummings EA, Reid GJ, Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Ritchie JA. Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatients. Pain. 1996;68(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03163-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hamers JP, Abu-Saad HH, van den Hout MA, Halfens RJ. Are children given insufficient pain-relieving medication postoperatively? Journal of advanced nursing. 1998 Jan;27(1):37–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mather L, Mackie J. The incidence of postoperative pain in children. Pain. 1983;15:271–281. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kart T, Christrup L, Rasmussen M. Recommended use of morphine in neonates, infants and children based on a literature review, part 2: clinical use. Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;7:93–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.1997.tb00488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Forward S, Brown T, McGrath P. Mothers’ attitudes and behavior toward medicating children’s pain. Pain. 1996;67:469–469. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fortier MA, MacLaren JE, Martin SR, Perret D, Kain ZN. Pediatric pain after ambulatory surgery: Where’s the medication? Pediatrics. 2009;124 doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pate J, Blount R, Cohen L, Smith A. Childhood medical experience and temperament as predictors of adult functioning in medical situations. Children’s Health Care. 1996;25:281–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Taddio A, Goldbach M, Ipp M, Stevens B, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys.[see comment] Lancet. 1995;345(8945):291–292. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90278-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Woolf CJ, Salter MW. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science. 2000;288(5472):1765–1769. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Forward SP, McNeill G, Fitzgerald P. Parents’ management of children’s pain following ‘minor’ surgery. Pain. 1996;64(1):83–87. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hamers J, Abu-Saad H. Children’s pain at home following (adeno) tonsillectomy. European Journal of Pain. 2002;6:213–213. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yaffa Zisk R, Grey M, MacLaren J, Kain Z. Exploring Socio-Demographic and Personality Characteristic Predictors of Parental Pain Perceptions. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2007;106:65–65. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000257927.35206.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Krivutza DM, Weinberg ME, Wang SM, Gaal D. Trends in the practice of parental presence during induction of anesthesia and the use of preoperative sedative premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: results of a follow-up national survey. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004 May;98(5):1252–1259. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111183.38618.d8. table of contents. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Visintainer MA, Wolfer JA. Psychological preparation for surgical pediatric patients: The effect on children’s and parents’ stress responses and adjustment. Pediatrics. 1975;56:187–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bevan JC, Johnston C, Haig MJ, et al. Preoperative parental anxiety predicts behavioral and emotional responses to induction of anesthesia in children. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37:177–177. doi: 10.1007/BF03005466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hannallah RS, Rosales JK. Experience with parents’ presence during anaesthesia induction in children. Can. Anaesth. Soc. J. 1983;30(3 Pt 1):286–289. doi: 10.1007/BF03013809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kain Z, Mayes L, Wang S, Caramico L, Hofstadter M. Parental presence during induction of anesthesia vs. sedative premedication: Which intervention is more effective? Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1147–1147. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199811000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kain Z. Parental presence and premedication revisited. Curr Opinion Anesth. 2001;14:331–331. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200106000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, et al. Parental presence during induction of anesthesia. A randomized controlled trial.[see comment] Anesthesiology. 1996 May;84(5):1060–1067. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199605000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kain ZN, MacLaren JE, Wang SM, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Zisk RY, Mayes LC. Pre-surgical preparation programs for children undergoing outpatient surgery: Current status. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:A955. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kain ZN, MacLaren JE, Hammell C, et al. Healthcare provider-child-parent communication in the preoperative surgical setting. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2009;19(4):376–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02921.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA. Preoperative psychological preparation of the child for surgery: an update. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. 2005 Dec;23(4):597–614. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2005.07.003. vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bellew M, Atkinson KR, Dixon G, Yates A. The introduction of a paediatric anaesthesia information leaflet: an audit of its impact on parental anxiety and satisfaction. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2002;12:124–124. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Koinig H. Preparing parents for their child’s surgery: preoperative parental information and education (an editorial) Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2002 Feb;12(2):107–109. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00833.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Felder-Puig R, Maksys A, Noestlinger C, Gadner HS H, Pfluegler A, Topf R. Using a children’s book to prepare children and parents for elective ENT surgery: results of a randomized clinical tri. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2003;67:35–35. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(02)00359-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Armstrong TSH, Aitken HL. The developing role of play preparation in the paediatric anaesthesia (an editorial) Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2000;10:1–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Watson A, Visram A. The developing role of play preparation in paediatric anaesthesia. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;10(6):685. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2000.0566f.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Huth M, Broome M, Mussatto K, Morgan S. A Study of the Effect of a Pain Man Education Booklet for Parents of Children Having Cardiac Surgery. Pain Man Nursing. 2003;4:31–31. doi: 10.1053/jpmn.2003.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hatava P, Olsson GL, Lagerkranser M. Preoperative psychological preparation for children undergoing ENT operations: a comparison of two methods. Paediatric Anesthesia. 2000;10:477–477. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.O’Byrne K, Peterson L, Saldana L. Survey of pediatric hospitals’ preparation programs: Evidence of the impact of health psychology research. Health Psychol. 1997;16(2):147–154. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cuzzocrea F, Gugliandolo MC, Larcan R, Romeo C, Turiaco N, Dominici T. A psychological preoperative program: effects on anxiety and cooperative behaviors. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):139–143. doi: 10.1111/pan.12100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pew Internet & American Life Project [Accessed April 30, 2014];Internet User Demographics. 2014 http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/
  • 61.De Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ. Couns. 1999;36:99–99. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dijkstra A, De Vries H. The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999;36:193–193. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00135-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, De Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med. 1996;25:236–236. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999;36:145–145. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00131-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lauver D, Ward S, Heidrich S, et al. Patient-centered interventions. Research in Nursing & Health. 2002;25:246–246. doi: 10.1002/nur.10044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.De Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ. Couns. 1999;36:99–99. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kreuter M, Wray R. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior. 2003;27(3):s227–223. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s3.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kreuter M, Skinner C. Tailoring: what’s in a name? Health Education Research. 2000;15:1–4. doi: 10.1093/her/15.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L. Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Education Research. 2001;16(6):647–660. doi: 10.1093/her/16.6.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein M, et al. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched tailored intervention. Preventive Medicine. 1998;27:748–748. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;77:S1028–S1034. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.4.1028S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Brug J, Oenema A, Kroeze W, Raat H. The internet and nutrition education: challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;59:S130–139. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kain ZN, Wang SM, Caramico LA, Hofstadter M, Mayes LC. Parental desire for perioperative information and informed consent: a two-phase study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997 Feb;84(2):299–306. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zisk Rony RY, Fortier MA, Chorney JM, Perret D, Kain ZN. Parental postoperative pain management: attitudes, assessment, and management. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1372–1378. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what’s in a name? Health Education Research. 2000 Feb 1;15(1):1–4. doi: 10.1093/her/15.1.1. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lairson DR, DiCarlo M, Myers RE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):779–788. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Koller D. Child Life Council evidence-based practice statement Child-Life Assessment: Variables associated with a child’s ability to cope with Hospitalization. Child Life Bulletin Focus. 2008;26(4):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Putnam SP, Rothbart MK, Putnam SP, Rothbart MK. Development of short and very short forms of the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2006 Aug;87(1):102–112. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.MacLaren JE, Kain ZN. Development of a Brief Behavioral Intervention for Children’s Anxiety at Anesthesia Induction. Children’s Health Care. in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kochanska G, Aksan N, Joy ME. Children’s Fearfulness as a Moderator of Parenting in Early Socialization: Two Longitudinal Studies. Developmental Psychology. 2007 Jan;43(1):222–237. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kain Z, Sevarino F, Alexander GA, Pincus S, Mayes LC. Predictors for postoperative pain in women undergoing surgery: A repeated measures design. J Psychosomatic Res. 2000;49:417–417. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, Nelson W, Mayes LC. Predicting which child-parent pair will benefit from parental presence during induction of anesthesia: a decision-making approach. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006 Jan;102(1):81–84. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181100.27931.A1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Compas BE, Connor-Smith JK, Saltzman H, Thomsen AH, Wadsworth ME. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. [Review] [220 refs] Psychol Bull. 2001;127:87–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Miller S. Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1987;52(2):345–353. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Miller SM. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer. 1995;76(2):167–177. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<167::aid-cncr2820760203>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Miller SM, Rodoletz M, Mangan CE, Schroeder CM, Sedlacek TV. Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats. Health Psychol. 1996;15(3):216–225. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.3.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Williams-Piehota P, Pizarro J, Schneider TR, et al. Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography. Health Psychology. 2005 Jan;24(1):58–67. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.1.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Williams-Piehota P, Schneider TR, Pizarro J, et al. Matching health messages to information-processing styles: need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Communication. 2003;15(4):375–392. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1504_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Latimer AE, Katulak NA, Mowad L, et al. Motivating cancer prevention and early detection behaviors using psychologically tailored messages. Journal of Health Communication. 2005;10(Suppl 1):137–137. doi: 10.1080/10810730500263364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.de Rond ME, de Wit R, van Dam FS, et al. A pain monitoring program for nurses: effects on nurses’ pain knowledge and attitude. Journal of Pain & Symptom Management. 2000 Jun;19(6):457–467. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Greenberg RS, Billett C, Zahurak M, et al. Videotape increases parental knowledge about pediatric pain management. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1999 Oct;89(4):899–903. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Krivutza D, Weinberg ME, Wang SM, Gaal D. Trends in the practice of parental presence during induction of anesthesia and the use of preoperative sedative premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: Results of a follow-up national survey. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004 May;98(5):1252–1259. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111183.38618.d8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kain Z, Caldwell-Andrews A, Mayes L, et al. Family-Centered Preparation for Surgery Improves Perioperative Outcomes in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:65–65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200701000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hamers JP, Abu-Saad HH. Children’s pain at home following (adeno) tonsillectomy. European Journal of Pain. 2002;6:213–213. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Jaaniste T, Hayes B, von Baeyer CL. Providing children with information about forthcoming medical procedures: A review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2007 Jun;14(2):124–143. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES