Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2014 Dec;29(4):335–337. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME2904rh

The Challenges of Studying the Anaerobic Microbial World

Koji Mori 1,*, Yoichi Kamagata 2,**
PMCID: PMC4262355  PMID: 25743613

Studies on strictly anaerobic microorganisms represent one of the most challenging areas of research, because anaerobic conditions (oxygen-free) need to be reconstructed to understand microbial activities and to obtain enrichments and pure culture. It is well-known that the micro/macro anaerobic environments are present everywhere on the Earth, and anaerobes comprise complex communities that play an important role in the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles on earth (49). Microbial community studies using 16S rRNA gene, as well as various functional genes, have offered new insights into anaerobic microbial ecology. Furthermore, numerous new lines of evidence offered by recent omics-driven and high-throughput sequencing studies provide a new vision of the anaerobic microbial world.

In the current issue of Microbes and Environments, Cheng et al. (4) reported that different types of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes that can be grown under specific temperatures ranges were detected in sulfate-amended enrichment cultures of muddy fluids taken from a Taiwanese terrestrial hydrocarbon seep, and that indigenous microbial communities might change based on the dynamic environmental fluctuations in volcanic mud ecosystems. Sulfate-reducing prokaryotes are frequently found in sulfate-supplied environment and are capable of growing on a variety of electron donors. In gas seeps and oil fields, the presence of various sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (9, 27, 30, 39) is associated with their potential to degrade anaerobic aromatic compounds and hydrocarbons. In fact, some sulfate-reducing bacteria are known to be decomposers of these compounds (e.g., Desulfobacula toluolica, Desulfogloeba alkanexedens, Desulfosarcina sp.) (5, 11, 12, 48). In addition, a recent study reported that the hyperthermophilic sulfate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus oxidizes long-chain n-alkanes (24). Together with these findings, sulfate-reducing bacteria are also known to be an important microbial group as syntrophic partners in anaerobic ecosystems. Consortia of anaerobic methanotrophic archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria contribute to the global methane consumption in methane-seeps (41). In addition, hydrogen and sulfur-compounds are syntrophically utilized by sulfate-reducing bacteria, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, fermenters and anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria in hot springs and hydrothermal fields showing the complexity and importance of synrtophic associations between organisms (10, 25, 36, 38).

Methanogens play a key role in anaerobic ecosystems, and represent the most important member for the effective organic degradation and the recovery of methane as energy in anaerobic digesters treating various types of wastewater (3, 13, 34, 50). Due to their growth under very low redox conditions, their cultivation and physiological analyses require special laboratory techniques and apparatus (8, 22). Methanogens are phylogenetically widespread among the phylum Euryarchaeota, and the discovery of new lineages is ongoing. Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis was isolated from human feces (7) and is the first methanogenic representative belonging to the class Thermoplasmata (14). The class originally consisted of acidophilic and aerobic archaea (42) and of uncultured lineages retrieved from hydrothermal fields (46), rice fields (23), and so on. Isolation of Thermoplasmata-related methanogens within the unexpected lineage suggests that methanogens are phylogenetically more diverse than previously thought, and holds the promise of the discovery of as-yet-unrecognized methanogens (6, 35). The genus Methanocella also represents a novel lineage of methanogens, formerly called “Rice Cluster I”, and the only cultivated representative belonging to the order Methanocellales (44). Sakai et al. successfully isolated Methanocella paludicola using an elaborate enrichment method: low-hydrogen conditions were created by using Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans as a hydrogen-producing fermenter (43) so that methanogens that favor low concentrations of hydrogen was selectively enriched and isolated. This example makes it clear that inventive approaches to cultivation provide opportunities for success. On the other hand, it is also important to easily and efficiently create the conditions for cultivation of fastidious anaerobic microorganisms like methanogens. Carbonero et al. (2) reported that improving the culture medium made the colony formation of Methanosaeta species successful. Nakamura et al. (32) developed a simple technique for the cultivation of anaerobic microorganisms, by using a six-well plate and anaerobic gas-pack system. Subsequently, Methanothermobacter tenebrarum was successfully isolated using this technique (33). Clearly, increase in colony forming efficiency would facilitate not only isolation of yet-to-be cultured methanogens but further studies using genetic manipulations.

Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) is a microbial process in which ammonium is anaerobically oxidized to nitrogen gas with nitrite as an electron acceptor. Strous et al. first reported that this phenomenon occurs with anammox bacteria belonging to the order “Brocadiales” in the phylum Planctomycetes (45). As this process does not require a supply of oxygen or of organic substrates for stimulation of denitrification, it is expected to serve as an alternative to conventional processes used to remove nitrogen from ammonia-rich wastewater. In nature, anammox has been detected in marine and fresh-water sediments, soils, and so on (1, 52), and it is likely that anammox bacteria significantly contribute to the global nitrogen cycle (15, 16, 28). Based on enrichment studies (26, 37, 51), five candidate genera, “Candidatus Anammoxoglobus”, “Candidatus Brocadia”, “Candidatus Jettenia”, “Candidatus Kuenenia”, and “Candidatus Scalindua”, have been proposed (17), but none of the pure cultures have been so far isolated. Oshiki et al. (37) reported that two dominant enrichments, those of “Candidatus Brocadia sinica” and of “Candidatus Scalindua sp.”, were obtained by using membrane bioreactors. The fluorescence in situ hybridization study indicated that anammox bacteria dominated the biomass, as they accounted for more than 90% of its total biomass. Additional ecophysiological and biochemical studies using this dominated and stable enrichment are required to obtain pure anammox bacteria and to fully clarify the anammox process.

As the current issue of Microbes and Environments introduces the ecophysiological functions of anaerobes. For example, the intestinal colonization by Lachnospiraceae bacterial strain AJ11941 may contribute to the development of metabolic dysfunctions in obese mice (20). The gut environments may represent interesting anaerobic ecosystems to study in association with their hosts (40, 47). Cross-interactions between aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms are important factors with respect to organic matter degradation and material cycles of various types (19, 29, 31). Recent studies reported that anaerobic microorganisms use filaments (flagella and pili) for their communication and respiration, and that they are important functional parts than previously thought (18, 21). Interspecies electron transfer using conductive flagella or inorganic materials will become one of the most intriguing topics in microbial ecology.

References

  • 1.Amano T, Yoshinaga I, Yamagishi T, Thuoc CV, Thu PT, Ueda S, Kato K, Sako Y, Suwa Y. Contribution of anammox bacteria to benthic nitrogen cycling in a mangrove forest and shrimp ponds, Haiphong, Vietnam. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:1–6. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carbonero F, Oakley BB, Purdy KJ. Improving the isolation of anaerobes on solid media: the example of the fastidious Methanosaeta. J. Mirobial Methods. 2010;80:203–205. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen C.-L, Wu J.-H, Tseng IC, Liang T.-M, Liu W.-T. Characterization of active microbes in a full-scale anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating phenolic wastewater. Microbes Envrion. 2009;24:144–153. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me09109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheng T.-W, Lin L.-H, Lin Y.-T, Song S.-R, Wang P.-L. Temperature-dependent variations in sulfate-reducing communities associated with a terrestrial hydrocarbon seep. Microbes Envrion. 2014;29:377–387. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davidova IA, Duncan KE, Choi OK, Suflita JM. Desulfoglaeba alkanexedens gen. nov., sp. nov., an n-alkane-degrading, sulfate-reducing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2737–2742. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64398-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dewi Puspita I, Kamagata Y, Tanaka M, Asano K, Nakatsu CH. Are uncultivated bacteria really uncultivable? Microbes Envrion. 2012;27:356–366. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dridi B, Fardeau M.-L, Ollivier B, Raoult D, Drancourt M. Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a methanogenic archaeon isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:1902–1907. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.033712-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Enoki M, Shinzato N, Sato H, Nakamura K, Kamagata Y. Comparative proteomic analysis of Methanothermobacter themautotrophicus ΔH in pure culture and in co-culture with a butyrate-oxidizing bcterium. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gieg L, Jack T, Foght J. Biological souring and mitigation in oil reservoirs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:263–282. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3542-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hamamura N, Meneghin J, Reysenbach A.-L. Comparative community gene expression analysis of Aquificales-dominated geothermal springs. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:1226–1237. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harms G, Zengler K, Rabus R, Aeckersberg F, Minz D, Rosselló-Mora R, Widdel F. Anaerobic oxidation of o-xylene, m-xylene, and homologous alkylbenzenes by new types of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:999–1004. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.3.999-1004.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Higashioka Y, Kojima H, Fukui M. Isolation and characterization of novel sulfate-reducing bacterium capable of anaerobic degradation of p-xylene. Microbes Envrion. 2012;27:273–277. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iguchi A, Terada T, Narihiro T, Yamaguchi T, Kamagata Y, Sekiguchi Y. In situ detection and quantification of uncultured members of the phylum Nitrospirae abundant in methanogenic wastewater treatment systems. Microbes Envrion. 2009;24:97–104. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me08562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iino T, Tamaki H, Tamazawa S, Ueno Y, Ohkuma M, Suzuki K-i, Igarashi Y, Haruta S. Candidatus Methanogranum caenicola: a novel methanogen from the anaerobic digested sludge, and proposal of Methanomassiliicoccaceae fam. nov. and Methanomassiliicoccales ord. nov., for a methanogenic lineage of the class Thermoplasmata. Microbes Envrion. 2013;28:244–250. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ishii S, Ikeda S, Minamisawa K, Senoo K. Nitrogen cycling in rice paddy environments: past achievements and future challenges. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:282–292. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me11293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Isobe K, Ohte N. Ecological perspectives on microbes involved in N-cycling. Microbes Envrion. 2014;29:4–16. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jetten MSM, Niftrik Lv, Strous M, Kartal B, Keltjens JT, Op den Camp HJM. Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;44:65–84. doi: 10.1080/10409230902722783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jiang S, Hur H.-G. Effects of the anaerobic respiration of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 on the stability of extracellular U(VI) nanofibers. Microbes Envrion. 2013;28:312–315. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kaiya S, Utsunomiya S, Suzuki S, Yoshida N, Futamata H, Yamada T, Hiraishi A. Isolation and functional gene analyses of aromatic-hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from a polychlorinated-dioxin- dechlorinating process. Microbes Envrion. 2012;27:127–135. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kameyama K, Itoh K. Intestinal colonization by a Lachnospiraceae bacterium contributes to the development of diabetes in obese mice. Microbes Envrion. 2014;29:427–430. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kato S, Watanabe K. Ecological and evolutionary interactions in syntrophic methanogenic consortia. Microbes Envrion. 2010;25:145–151. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kato S, Sasaki K, Watanabe K, Yumoto I, Kamagata Y. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of the thermophilic, aceticlastic methanogen Methanosaeta thermophila responding to ammonia stress. Microbes Envrion. 2014;29:162–167. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kemnitz D, Kolb S, Conrad R. Phenotypic characterization of Rice Cluster III archaea without prior isolation by applying quantitative polymerase chain reaction to an enrichment culture. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:553–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00723.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khelifi N, Amin Ali O, Roche P, Grossi V, Brochier-Armanet C, Valette O, Ollivier B, Dolla A, Hirschler-Rea A. Anaerobic oxidation of long-chain n-alkanes by the hyperthermophilic sulfate-reducing archaeon, Archaeoglobus fulgidus. ISME J. 2014;8:2153–2166. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kimura H, Mori K, Nashimoto H, Hanada S, Kato K. In situ biomass production of a hot spring sulfur-turf microbial mat. Microbes Envrion. 2010;25:140–143. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me09181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kindaichi T, Awata T, Suzuki Y, Tanabe K, Hatamoto M, Ozaki N, Ohashi A. Enrichment using an up-flow column reactor and community structure of marine anammox bacteria from coastal sediment. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:67–73. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kleindienst S, Herbst F.-A, Stagars M, et al. Diverse sulfate-reducing bacteria of the Desulfosarcina/Desulfococcus clade are the key alkane degraders at marine seeps. ISME J. 2014;8:2029–2044. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kubota K. CARD-FISH for environmental microorganisms: technical advancement and future applications. Microbes Envrion. 2013;28:3–12. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lv X.-M, Shao M.-F, Li C.-L, Li J, Gao X.-L, Sun F.-Y. A comparative study of the bacterial community in denitrifying and traditional enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes. Microbes Envrion. 2014;29:261–268. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Magot M, Ollivier B, Patel BC. Microbiology of petroleum reservoirs. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2000;77:103–116. doi: 10.1023/a:1002434330514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Makhdoumi-Kakhki A, Amoozegar MA, Kazemi B, Pašić L, Ventosa A. Prokaryotic diversity in Aran-Bidgol salt lake, the largest hypersaline playa in Iran. Microbes Envrion. 2012;27:87–93. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nakamura K, Tamaki H, Kang MS, Mochimaru H, Lee S.-T, Nakamura K, Kamagata Y. A six-well plate method: less laborious and effective method for cultivation of obligate anaerobic microorganisms. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:301–306. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me11120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nakamura K, Takahashi A, Mori C, Tamaki H, Mochimaru H, Nakamura K, Takamizawa K, Kamagata Y. Methanothermobacter tenebrarum sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic, thermophilic methanogen isolated from gas-associated formation water of a natural gas field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:715–722. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.041681-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Narihiro T, Terada T, Kikuchi K, et al. Comparative analysis of bacterial and archaeal communities in methanogenic sludge granules from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating various food-processing, high-strength organic wastewaters. Microbes Envrion. 2009;24:88–96. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me08561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Narihiro T, Kamagata Y. Cultivating yet-to-be cultivated microbes: the challenge continues. Microbes Envrion. 2013;28:163–165. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME2802rh. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nunoura T, Hirai M, Miyazaki M, et al. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic, obligately anaerobic and heterotrophic marine Chloroflexi bacterium from a Chloroflexi-dominated microbial community associated with a Japanese shallow hydrothermal system, and proposal for Thermomarinilinea lacunofontalis gen. nov., sp. nov. Microbes Envrion. 2013;28:228–235. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oshiki M, Awata T, Kindaichi T, Satoh H, Okabe S. Cultivation of planktonic anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria using membrane bioreactor. Microbes Envrion. 2013;28:436–443. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Otaki H, Everroad RC, Matsuura K, Haruta S. Production and consumption of hydrogen in hot spring microbial mats dominated by a filamentous anoxygenic photosynthetic bacterium. Microbes Envrion. 2012;27:293–299. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Priha O, Nyyssönen M, Bomberg M, Laitila A, Simell J, Kapanen A, Juvonen R. Application of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography for monitoring sulfate-reducing bacteria in oil fields. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:5186–5196. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01015-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qi W, Chen C.-L, Wang J.-Y. Reducing sugar-producing bacteria from guts of Tenebrio Molitor Linnaeus (yellow mealworm) for lignocellulosic waste minimization. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:354–359. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me11129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Raghoebarsing AA, Pol A, Van de Pas-Schoonen KT, et al. A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature. 2006;440:918–921. doi: 10.1038/nature04617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rekysenbach A.-L. Class IV. Thermoplasmata class nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholtz RW, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd edn. Vol. 1. Springer; New York: 2001. pp. 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sakai S, Imachi H, Sekiguchi Y, Ohashi A, Harada H, Kamagata Y. Isolation of key methanogens for global methane emission from rice paddy fields: a novel isolate affiliated with the clone cluster rice cluster I. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:4326–4331. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03008-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sakai S, Imachi H, Hanada S, Ohashi A, Harada H, Kamagata Y. Methanocella paludicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a methane-producing archaeon, the first isolate of the lineage ‘Rice Cluster I’, and proposal of the new archaeal order Methanocellales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:929–936. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65571-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Strous M, Fuerst JA, Kramer EH, Logemann S, Muyzer G, van de Pas-Schoonen KT, Webb R, Kuenen JG, Jetten MS. Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete. Nature. 1999;400:446–449. doi: 10.1038/22749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Takai K, Horikoshi K. Genetic diversity of archaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments. Genetics. 1999;152:1285–1297. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thong-On A, Suzuki K, Noda S, Inoue J-i, Kajiwara S, Ohkuma M. Isolation and characterization of anaerobic bacteria for symbiotic recycling of uric acid nitrogen in the gut of various termites. Microbes Envrion. 2012;27:186–192. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wöhlbrand L, Jacob JH, Kube M, et al. Complete genome, catabolic sub-proteomes and key-metabolites of Desulfobacula toluolica Tol2, a marine, aromatic compound-degrading, sulfate-reducing bacterium. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:1334–1355. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6578–6583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yamada C, Kato S, Ueno Y, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. Inhibitory effects of ferrihydrite on a thermophilic methanogenic community. Microbes Envrion. 2014;29:227–230. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yasuda T, Waki M, Yoshinaga I, Amano T, Suzuki K, Tanaka Y, Yamagishi T, Suwa Y. Evidence of exponential growth of an anammox population in an anaerobic batch culture. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:266–269. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yoshinaga I, Amano T, Yamagishi T, Okada K, Ueda S, Sako Y, Suwa Y. Distribution and diversity of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria in the sediment of a eutrophic freshwater lake, Lake Kitaura, Japan. Microbes Envrion. 2011;26:189–197. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES