Skip to main content
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) logoLink to Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
. 2014 Nov 5;30(1):232–238. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu296

No evidence for mutations in NLRP7, NLRP2 or KHDC3L in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss or infertility

L Aghajanova 1,, S Mahadevan 2,3,4,, S Altmäe 5, A Stavreus-Evers 6, L Regan 7, N Sebire 8, P Dixon 9, RA Fisher 10, IB Van den Veyver 2,3,4,11,*
PMCID: PMC4262469  PMID: 25376457

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Are mutations in NLRP2/7 (NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 2/7) or KHDC3L (KH Domain Containing 3 Like) associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We found no evidence for mutations in NLRP2/7 or KHDC3L in unexplained RPL or infertility.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L are known to cause biparental hydatidiform moles (BiHMs), a rare form of pregnancy loss. NLRP2, while not associated with the BiHM pathology, is known to cause recurrent Beckwith Weidemann Syndrome (BWS).

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, AND DURATION

Ninety-four patients with well characterized, unexplained infertility were recruited over a 9-year period from three IVF clinics in Sweden. Blood samples from 24 patients with 3 or more consecutive miscarriages of unknown etiology were provided by the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic at St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients were recruited into both cohorts following extensive clinical studies. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood and subject to Sanger sequencing of NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L. Sequence electropherograms were analyzed by Sequencher v5.0 software and variants compared with those observed in the 1000 Genomes, single nucleotide polymorphism database (dbSNP) and HapMap databases. Functional effects of non-synonymous variants were predicted using Polyphen-2 and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

No disease-causing mutations were identified in NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L in our cohorts of unexplained infertility and RPL.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Due to the limited patient size, it is difficult to conclude if the low frequency single nucleotide polymorphisms observed in the present study are causative of the phenotype. The design of the present study therefore is only capable of detecting highly penetrant mutations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The present study supports the hypothesis that mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L are specific for the BiHM phenotype and do not play a role in other adverse reproductive outcomes. Furthermore, to date, mutations in NLRP2 have only been associated with the imprinting disorder BWS in offspring and there is no evidence for a role in molar pregnancies, RPL or unexplained infertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by the following sources: Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (Grant SF0180044s09), Enterprise Estonia (Grant EU30020); Mentored Resident research project (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine); Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; Grant Number C06RR029965 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCCR; NIH). No competing interests declared.

Keywords: recurrent pregnancy loss, unexplained infertility, NLRP2, NLRP7, KHDC3L

Introduction

Infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) are important reproductive phenotypes of multifactorial origin that affect up to 30% and 5–15% of couples of reproductive age attempting a pregnancy, respectively (Rai and Regan, 2006; Boivin et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2011). Maternal comorbidities along with maternal and fetal genetic factors play a role in the etiology of these conditions, but despite extensive research, a cause cannot be identified in up to 13% (SART, 2010) of cases with unexplained infertility and 40–50% (Allison and Schust, 2009) with RPL. Previous human studies, as well as animal models with reproductive phenotypes suggest that numerous genes with high-impact mutations may contribute to a small number of cases, supporting the evaluation of plausible candidate genes in cohorts of affected patients (Carp et al., 2001; Suzumori and Sugiura-Ogasawara, 2010; Su et al., 2011).

Infertility is defined as the inability to conceive within 1 year of unprotected regular intercourse whereas a diagnosis of unexplained infertility is made when no cause is found despite a complete workup with documented evidence of ovulation, adequate ovarian reserve, patent Fallopian tubes, normal semen analysis and no evidence of endometriosis or pelvic adhesions (Jerome and Strauss, 2009). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) defines RPL as two or more repetitive pregnancy losses prior to 20 weeks of gestation, while the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists defines RPL as the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies prior to viability, i.e. 24 weeks of gestation. Similar to infertility, causes can be multiple, including maternal and placental factors as well as genetic defects in the mother or fetus. Accordingly, several genes have been causally associated with RPL (Daniely et al., 2001; Suzumori and Sugiura-Ogasawara, 2010; Daher et al., 2012).

One specific form of pregnancy loss, hydatidiform mole (HM) is an abnormal human pregnancy characterized by cystic degeneration of chorionic villi and trophoblastic hyperplasia. Complete HM are usually sporadic and androgenetic (AnCHM), but rare forms of CHM are biparentally inherited (BiHM) and can be a cause of RPL in affected women (Murdoch et al., 2006; Kou et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009). Most affected women with recurrent BiHM have been found to have mutations of NLRP7 (NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 7) or KHDC3L (KH Domain Containing 3 Like). The loss of methylation phenotype observed in BiHM tissues is suggestive of a role for NLRP7, and possibly KHDC3L, in reprogramming imprints in the maternal germline, believed to be relevant to the pathogenesis of BiHM (Judson et al., 2002; Murdoch et al., 2006; Parry et al., 2011).

It has recently been reported that heterozygous mutations in NLRP7 might be associated with other forms of reproductive failure, such as recurrent miscarriage and sporadic HM (Messaed et al., 2011). However, given the specificity of the imprinting defects seen in BiHM tissues, the association of NLRP7 with other forms of adverse reproductive outcomes is difficult to reconcile, and subsequent reports have thus far not been able to confirm these findings (Andreasen et al., 2012, 2013; Dixon et al., 2012; Mahadevan et al., 2013; Manokhina et al., 2013). In contrast, given the observation that NLRP7 and KHDC3L may be important for proper switching of imprinting marks in the maternal germline, these genes could be associated with unexplained apparent infertility, if the clinical presentation of preimplantation developmental arrest of embryos resulted from disruption of DNA methylation at imprinted or non-imprinted loci.

To address the hypothesis that mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L may cause infertility, we sequenced NLRP7 and KHDC3L in DNA from 94 women with extensively characterized unexplained infertility. To explore the current controversy about the association of mutations in these genes with RPL, we also performed mutational analysis in DNA of 24 women with RPL.

Finally, since NLRP7 is believed to have evolved from NLRP2 (NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 2) (Tian et al., 2009a,b), a maternal effect gene associated with Beckwith Weidemann Syndrome (BWS) (Meyer et al., 2009), and a recent report has suggested an association between NLRP2 and recurrent miscarriages (Huang et al., 2013) we have also sequenced NLRP2 in both cohorts.

Materials and Methods

Study subjects: unexplained infertility

This study group included 94 women with a diagnosis of primary unexplained infertility. All women were Swedish or Finnish in origin. Blood samples were collected following written informed consent in three IVF clinics in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge; Fertility Center Scandinavia, Stockholm and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden between 2000 and 2009. Unexplained infertility was diagnosed after confirmed ovulation, normal ovarian function and normal serum levels of FSH, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid hormone. At least two analyses of the partner's semen were shown to be normal according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria (World Health Organisation, 1999). Furthermore, all infertile women showed patent tubes on hysterosonosalpingogram, and no endometriosis was identified by clinical evaluation, ultrasonography or diagnostic laparoscopy. The mean age was 33.0 + 3.5 years, BMI was 22.9 + 3.6 kg/m2. All subjects had regular menstrual cycles with mean cycle length of 28.5 + 2.1 days and duration of menstrual flow of 4.7 + 0.8 days. None of the patients has been pregnant before, and had not used any hormonal medication at least 3 months prior to sampling.

The Ethical Review Boards at Karolinska Institutet, Uppsala University and Baylor College of Medicine approved the study. Peripheral blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi kits according to manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands).

Study subjects: RPL

This study group included 24 women with a mean of 4.7 (range 3–10) miscarriages of unknown etiology referred to the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic at St Mary's Hospital, London. Twenty-two women were of Caucasian origin and two Asian. Blood samples were collected after informed consent. Peripheral blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kits according to manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, UK). This study was approved by the local research ethics committee of St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.

Sequencing of NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L

Primers used to sequence the coding exons of the genes NLRP7 and KHDC3L were those that have been used previously (Wang et al., 2009; Mahadevan et al., 2013). Primers used to sequence NLRP2 are provided in Table I. PCR was performed on 20–50 ng of genomic DNA under standard conditions. Purified PCR products were sequenced in the forward orientation at Beckman Coulter Genomics (Danver, MA, USA and UK). Confirmation of mutations was carried out on repeated PCR reactions in both directions. Sequence electropherograms were analyzed using Sequencher v5.0 software. Sequence variations were compared with those in the 1000 Genomes, single nucleotide polymorphism database (dbSNP) and HapMap public databases. The predicted functional effects of novel non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were evaluated using PolyPhen-2 and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT). Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were calculated for non-synonymous variants in our cohorts and compared with those reported in dbSNP. MAFs are expressed as frequencies with which SNPs are observed, where a heterozygous SNP was counted once and a homozygous SNP was counted twice as per MAF nomenclature.

Table I.

Primer sequences for NLRP2 (NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 2).

Exon Forward primer 5′–3′ Reverse primer 5′–3′ Tm Product (bp)
2 agcaggaactggcatttgag gcctggccttctgaatttct 60°C 451
3 tgaaggcaataaaatcttgagc tgctaagtccggcatttctt 60°C 223
4 gactcaggggtccaacttga ttggagagagatggggttctt 60°C 250
5 atcagcctgcctccttttct tgctttgtgttacataggaaagtt 60°C 244
6 ggccaacacaaggcattt tgggatgaggctaaagatgg 60°C 1704
7 tgatgcttcttgggtgttga ctctcaattccctgtgtctcg 60°C 463
8 gcccctggtttccatttaag tcctcacgtatggttgtcca 60°C 441
9, 10 ctgcatccaacattagagtcag gcatcatgcttggaactttt 60°C 1387
11 aactcacaggttcgggtttg aaccatcctagtaaatgctcgat 60°C 360
12 cagatccccaacacacgag agaaattggctgggtgtga 60°C 400
13 ccctgtgcctccttaacaga cagaggcagaatcatggcta 60°C 383

Results

Sequence analysis of the coding exons and exon–intron boundaries of NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L revealed no putative disease-causing mutations in either patient cohort.

Unexplained infertility cohort

Sequencing of NLRP2 revealed several SNPs, most of which were present in dbSNP and had MAF scores available. One SNP in exon 4 seen in a heterozygous state in a single patient causing a c.361G>A variation changed amino acid 121 from Aspartic acid to Alanine (p.Asp121Ala). This SNP was not previously reported in dbSNP and was predicted by PolyPhen-2 to be benign and by SIFT to be tolerated. Seven other SNPs (rs142463014, rs150097185, rs148817929, rs142528551, rs189403101, rs61735082, rs61735083) were present in dbSNP but did not have MAF scores associated with them. However, given the low frequency with which we observed these SNPs in our study group, we speculate that they are unlikely to make a major contribution to infertility (Table II). More studies of ethnically matched controls will be necessary to establish or rule out causality.

Table II.

Non-synonymous variants identified in NLRP2 in cases of primary infertility or RPL.

Exon Nucleotide change Protein change dbSNP
MAF Score (Minor Allele)
ID MAF (Minor Allele) Unexplained infertility RPL
2 c.11C>T p.S4L rs142463014 Unavailable 0.005(T) 0.0208(T)
2 c.15G>A p.A5A rs269912 0.122(A) 0.191(A) 0.1875(A)
2 c.175C>T p.L59F rs150097185 Unavailable 0.005(T)
3 c.312G>A p.K104K rs2217659 0.214(A) 0.154(A) 0.1875(A)
4 c.361G>A p.D121A Novel Unavailable 0.005(A)
6 c.519C>T p.F172F rs10403648 0.145(T) 0.042(T) 0.0417(T)
6 c.596C>T p.T198M rs17699678 0.061(T) 0.313(T) 0.1041(T)
6 c.715C>T p.L239L rs56073572 0.047(T) 0.138(T) 0.1041(T)
6 c.979G>C p.E327Q rs148817929 Unavailable 0.010(C)
6 c.982G>C p.E328Q rs142528551 Unavailable 0.010(C)
6 c.1010G>A p.R337Q rs149735961 Unavailable 0.0157(A) 0.0208(A)
6 c.1009T>C p.F337L rs62124644 0.005(C) 0.005(C) 0.0208(C)
6 c.1056C>T p.D352D rs3826883 0.144(T) 0.207(C) 0.2291(C)
6 c.1072C>T p.R358C rs189403101 Unavailable 0.005(T)
6 c.1480A>G p.T494A rs61735082 Unavailable 0.015(G) 0.0208(G)
6 c.1500A>G p.E500E rs3745905 0.149(G) 0.047(G) 0.0208(G)
6 c.1499A>G p.E500G rs61735083 Unavailable 0.015 0.0625
6 c.1506T>C p.D502D rs61735084 0.009(C) 0.015(C) 0.0208(C)
6 c.1519A>G p.T507A rs34804158 0.160(G) 0.212(G) 0.25(G)
6 c.1608T>C p.F536F rs10412915 0.306(C) 0.313(C) 0.3125(C)
6 c.1749C>G p.L583L rs11672113 0.293(G) 0.382(G) 0.375(G)
7 c.2044C>T p.L704L rs61733928 0.018(T) 0.026(T)
13 c.2994C>A p.I1020I rs12768 0.442(C) 0.558(C) 0.5208(C)
13 c.3089C>A p.A1052E rs1043673 0.359(A) 0.367(A) 0.3958(A)

SNP not found in the study group.

MAF, minor allele frequency.

Sequencing of NLRP7 also revealed several SNPs which have been reported previously in other studies across various ethnicities. We found one novel SNP, p.Met427Leu, which was predicted by SIFT to be damaging (score 0.02) but by Polyphen-2 to be benign (score 0.007). We observed this SNP in only one patient and in the heterozygous state. Four SNPs (rs149175257, rs1654634, rs61745087, rs104895545) were present in dbSNP without associated MAF scores (Table III). Similar to the SNPs observed in NLRP2, since we observed these SNPs at a very low frequency in our study group, we speculated that they are unlikely to be predictive or causative of infertility.

Table III.

Non-synonymous variants identified in NLRP7 in cases of primary infertility or RPL—SNP not found in the study group.

Exon Nucleotide change Protein change dbSNP
MAF Score (Minor Allele)
ID MAF (Minor Allele) Unexplained infertility RPL
2 c.66A>G p.L22L rs149175257 Unavailable 0.005(G)
4 c.390G>A p. Q130Q rs775883 0.373(A) 0.297(A) 0.33(A)
4 c.1137G>C/T p.K379K rs10418277 0.191(T) 0.196(C) 0.187(C)
4 c.1725G>T p.L575L rs73055288 0.019(A) 0.047(A)
4 c.467G>A p.R156Q rs61746625 0.001(A) 0.010(A)
4 c.1279A>T p.M427L Novel Unavailable 0.005(T)
4 c.1288T>C p.F430L rs1654634 Unavailable 0.005(C)
4 c.1290C>T p.F430F rs61745087 Unavailable 0.005(T)
4 c.1302C>T p.D434D rs104895545 Unavailable 0.005(T)
4 c.1441G>A p.A481T rs61747414 0.101(A) 0.090(A) 0.1041(A)
4 c.1104T>C p.I368I rs1654636 0.027(C) 0.005(C)
4 c.574A>C p.M192L rs104895529 0.000(C) 0.005(C)
4 c.929A>G p.Q310R rs77812009 0.009(G) 0.0208(G)
4 c.931C>A p.L311I rs79513034 0.009(A) 0.015(A) 0.0208(A)
4 c.955G>A p.V319I rs775882 0.278(A) 0.19(A) 0.2083(A)
4 c.1104T>C p.I368I rs1654636 0.028(C) 0.0208(C)
4 c.1460G>A p.G487E rs775881 0.115(A) 0.02(A) 0.0416(A)
4 c.1491C>T p.I497I rs775880 0.083(T) 0.026(T) 0.0416(T)
4 c.1532A>G p.K511R rs61743949 0.025(G) 0.005(G) 0.0208(G)
4 c.1725G>T p.L575L rs73055288 0.025(T) 0.04(T) 0.0208(T)
6 c.2156C>T p. A719V rs104895526 <0.001(T) 0.005(T) 0.0208(T)
7 c.2444G>A p.R815H rs150034626 0.001(A) 0.005(A)
9 c.2682T>C p. Y894Y rs269951 0.425(T) 0.468(T) 0.4583(T)
9 c.2775A>G p.A925A rs269950 0.425(A) 0.468(G) 0.4583(G)

Sequencing of KHDC3L revealed three known SNPs, all of which were at frequencies comparable with those reported in dbSNP except for rs144291287, which had no associated MAF score (Table IV).

Table IV.

Non-synonymous variants identified in KHDC3L (KH Domain Containing 3 Like) in cases of primary infertility or RPL—SNP not found in the study group.

Exon Nucleotide change Protein change dbSNP
MAF Score (Minor Allele)
ID MAF (Minor Allele) Unexplained infertility RPL
1 c.14G>A p.R5K rs144291287 Unavailable 0.0106(A)
2 c.289G>C p.E97Q rs5645333 0.071(C) 0.1382(C) 0.0416(C)
3 c.602C>G p.A201G rs561930 0.49(G) 0.6968(G) 0.5208(G)

RPL cohort

Sequencing of NLRP2 in this cohort also yielded known SNPs comparable with reported frequencies (Table II). Two SNPs did not have documented MAF scores. rs149735961 (c.1010G>A; p.Arg337Gln) was predicted by both PolyPhen-2 and SIFT to be damaging (SIFT score 0.04 and PolyPhen-2 score 0.989) and this SNP was seen in a heterozygous state in a single patient. rs61735082 (c.1480A>G; p.Thr494Ala) and rs61735083 (c.1499A>G; p.Glu500Gly) were both predicted by PolyPhen-2 and SIFT to be benign changes.

No novel mutations were identified in the RPL cohort in either of the two genes implicated in familial HM, NLRP7 or KHDC3L. Sequencing of these genes identified a number of previously described polymorphisms in both genes, at frequencies comparable with published databases (Tables III and IV).

Discussion

We analyzed women with unexplained infertility and women with RPL for mutations in NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L and found no disease-causing mutations in these genes in our study cohorts. This observation is in agreement with our hypothesis that mutations in NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L are unlikely to be causative of RPL. These studies also show that, at least in this cohort of 94 patients, they are not associated with unexplained infertility. These data thus indicate that mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L are primarily associated with the recurrent, biparentally inherited HMs. In addition, our current results, as well as those of other studies (Andreasen et al., 2012) have thus far not revealed an association of NLRP2 with any of these conditions.

The mutational spectrum of NLRP7 in the context of HM has been tested in various ethnic groups (Kou et al., 2008; Messaed et al., 2011; Muhlstein et al., 2011; Qian et al., 2011; Dixon et al., 2012; Landolsi et al., 2012; Estrada et al., 2013). There have been several reports suggesting an immunological role for NLRP7 in the etiology of adverse reproductive outcomes such as miscarriage, AnCHM, spontaneous abortion, etc. (Qian et al., 2007, 2011; Slim et al., 2011; Reddy et al., 2012). These attempts were rationalized by the knowledge that NLRP7 is a member of the NLRP family of proteins which have been found to have a role in innate immunity and apoptosis (Kufer and Sansonetti, 2011; Radian et al., 2013). This has been used to support the hypothesis that mutations in NLRP7 cause BiHM because its loss of function creates a sub-optimal uterine environment that fails to reject the abnormal pregnancy. However, given the spatio-temporal patterns of expression of NLRP7 (Zhang et al., 2008) in the female germ line and early embryo and the fact that imprint reprogramming occurs in the germ line and early embryo, our alternate hypothesis proposes a more direct role for NLRP7 in the process of imprint acquisition and/or maintenance. More recent research in an in vitro model provides the first concrete evidence that loss of NLRP7 affects trophoblast differentiation and genome-wide DNA methylation (Mahadevan et al., 2014). Furthermore, although the function of KHDC3L has not yet been defined, there is no evidence for a potential role in immune defense and it also belongs to a family of proteins with documented preferential expression and function in the female germ line and early embryo (Pierre et al., 2007; Tian et al., 2009a,b; Tashiro et al., 2010). We therefore hypothesize that NLRP7 and KHDC3L perform similar, potentially overlapping functions in reprogramming of maternal imprinting marks.

Extensive research is also being performed toward identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets for unexplained infertility, with different studies focusing on ovary and oocyte quality, or on endometrial receptivity and the implantation process (Horcajadas et al., 2007; Aghajanova et al., 2008; Altmae et al., 2010). Several groups have been working on identifying genetic polymorphisms in candidate genes in women with unexplained infertility. It has been suggested that polymorphisms in the genes encoding aromatase (CYP19A1), hyaluronan-binding protein 2 and tissue factor pathway inhibitor could influence their levels of expression in receptive endometrium (Altmae et al., 2009, 2011a,b). Associations of polymorphisms in genes encoding anti-Müllerian hormone and its receptor, estrogen receptor alpha and leukemia inhibitory factor with unexplained infertility have also been reported (Steck et al., 2004; Rigon et al., 2010; Du et al., 2011). Many association studies have been performed in a search for molecular markers for recurrent miscarriage. Although there is some inconsistency in the results, polymorphisms in genes involved in inflammation, thrombosis and the cardiovascular system, the detoxification system, immune response, hormonal regulation and placental function have been shown to associate with a risk for RPL (Su et al., 2011; Rull et al., 2012).

In sequencing NLRP2 in the unexplained infertility cohort, we observed eight SNPs, seven of which were reported in dbSNP but did not have associated MAF scores. Given the low frequency with which we observed these SNPs and the fact that they were all noted in the heterozygous state, we speculated that they are unlikely to be causal or predictive of the infertility of unknown etiology. Similarly in the RPL cohort, two of all the observed SNPs, did not have an associated MAF score and p.Arg337Gln was the only SNP observed in this cohort which was predicted to be possibly damaging to the function of the protein, as predicted by both Polyphen-2 and SIFT.

Sequencing of NLRP7 in the unexplained infertility cohort revealed 1 novel SNP, p.Met427Leu which has not been described in dbSNP. The potential effect of this SNP on the function of NLRP7 had discordant predictions from two commonly used algorithms. Polyphen-2 predicted that the SNP would be benign while SIFT predicted that the SNP would be damaging to the function of the protein. Additionally, four SNPs present in dbSNP but without associated MAF scores were observed, and all four of these were found in a single patient and in a heterozygous state. Similar to the speculations made for the SNPs seen in NLRP2, we concluded that the SNPs observed in NLRP7 are also unlikely to be causal or predictive of the phenotype. We observed a single patient each with a heterozygous p.Ala719Val change in both the infertility and RPL cohorts. This change has been noted in previous studies where it was suggested to be causative of the pathology (Qian et al., 2011; Slim et al., 2011). Whether this change could be causative of the phenotypes described in the present study is difficult to determine due to the size of the study. Our data and that of others only exclude the involvement of highly penetrant mutations.

Sequencing of KHDC3L in the unexplained infertility cohort did not reveal any novel SNPs or any changes that did not have comparable MAF scores to the control population, based on the scores provided by dbSNP. Identical results, with a lack of any potential disease-causing variants were found in the RPL cohort.

In conclusion, we did not find mutations in NLRP2, NLRP7 and KHDC3L in women with RPL or unexplained infertility. This supports the hypothesis that mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L are specific for the BiHM phenotype and do not play a role in other adverse reproductive outcomes. Furthermore, to date, mutations in NLRP2 have only been associated with the imprinting disorder BWS in offspring and there is no evidence for a role in molar pregnancies, RPL or unexplained infertility.

Authors' roles

S.A. and A.S.-E. were involved in collection of samples for the Infertility cohort. L.R., N.S., R.A.F. and P.D. were involved in collection of samples for the Recurrent Miscarriage cohort and performing sequencing of NLRP7 and KHDC3L in the same. L.A. and S.M. were involved in the sequencing of NLRP7, NLRP2 and KHDC3L in the Infertility and NLRP2 in the Recurrent Miscarriage cohorts. All authors contributed to drafting and editing the manuscript. I.B.V.V. was responsible for project design, oversight of all experiments, interpretation and final manuscript preparation.

Funding

This study was funded by the following sources: Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (Grant SF0180044s09), Enterprise Estonia (Grant EU30020); Mentored Resident research project (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine); Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; Grant Number C06RR029965 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCCR; NIH).

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

References

  1. Aghajanova L, Hamilton AE, Giudice LC. Uterine receptivity to human embryonic implantation: histology, biomarkers, and transcriptomics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19:204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allison JL, Schust DJ. Recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss: revised definitions and novel causes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2009;16:446–450. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283327fc5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altmae S, Haller K, Peters M, Saare M, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A, Velthut A, Karro H, Metspalu A, Salumets A. Aromatase gene (CYP19A1) variants, female infertility and ovarian stimulation outcome: a preliminary report. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:651–657. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altmae S, Martinez-Conejero JA, Salumets A, Simon C, Horcajadas JA, Stavreus-Evers A. Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:178–187. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Altmae S, Kallak TK, Friden B, Stavreus-Evers A. Variation in hyaluronan-binding protein 2 (HABP2) promoter region is associated with unexplained female infertility. Reprod Sci. 2011a;18:485–492. doi: 10.1177/1933719110388849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Altmae S, Salumets A, Bjuresten K, Kallak TK, Wanggren K, Landgren BM, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A. Tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitors TFPI and TFPI2 in human secretory endometrium—possible link to female infertility. Reprod Sci. 2011b;18:666–678. doi: 10.1177/1933719111400633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andreasen L, Bolund L, Niemann I, Hansen ES, Sunde L. Mosaic moles and non-familial biparental moles are not caused by mutations in NLRP7, NLRP2 or C6orf221. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012;18:593–598. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gas036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andreasen L, Christiansen OB, Niemann I, Bolund L, Sunde L. NLRP7 or KHDC3L genes and the etiology of molar pregnancies and recurrent miscarriage. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19:773–781. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1506–1512. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:678–682. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01801-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Daher S, Mattar R, Gueuvoghlanian-Silva BY, Torloni MR. Genetic polymorphisms and recurrent spontaneous abortions: an overview of current knowledge. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67:341–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Daniely M, Aviram A, Carp HJ, Shaki R, Barkai G. The association between sporadic somatic parental aneuploidy and chromosomally abnormal placentae in habitual abortions. Early Pregnancy. 2001;5:153–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon PH, Trongwongsa P, Abu-Hayyah S, Ng SH, Akbar SA, Khawaja NP, Seckl MJ, Savage PM, Fisher RA. Mutations in NLRP7 are associated with diploid biparental hydatidiform moles, but not androgenetic complete moles. J Med Genet. 2012;49:206–211. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Du JW, Tao XR, Xu KY, Fang LY, Qi XL. Polymorphisms in estrogen receptor-alpha are associated with idiopathic female infertility. Mol Med Rep. 2011;4:1239–1242. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Estrada H, Buentello B, Zenteno JC, Fiszman R, Aguinaga M. The p.L750V mutation in the NLRP7 gene is frequent in Mexican patients with recurrent molar pregnancies and is not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:205–208. doi: 10.1002/pd.4036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simon C. Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:77–86. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang JY, Su M, Lin SH, Kuo PL. A genetic association study of NLRP2 and NLRP7 genes in idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1127–1134. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jerome F, Strauss IRLB. Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  19. Judson H, Hayward BE, Sheridan E, Bonthron DT. A global disorder of imprinting in the human female germ line. Nature. 2002;416:539–542. doi: 10.1038/416539a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kou YC, Shao L, Peng HH, Rosetta R, del Gaudio D, Wagner AF, Al-Hussaini TK, Van den Veyver IB. A recurrent intragenic genomic duplication, other novel mutations in NLRP7 and imprinting defects in recurrent biparental hydatidiform moles. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:33–40. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gam079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kufer TA, Sansonetti PJ. NLR functions beyond pathogen recognition. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:121–128. doi: 10.1038/ni.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Landolsi H, Rittore C, Philibert L, Hmissa S, Gribaa M, Touitou I, Yacoubi MT. NLRP7 mutation analysis in sporadic hydatidiform moles in Tunisian patients: NLRP7 and sporadic mole. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:646–651. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0399-OA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahadevan S, Wen S, Balasa A, Fruhman G, Mateus J, Wagner A, Al-Hussaini T, Van den Veyver IB. No evidence for mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L in women with androgenetic hydatidiform moles. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:1242–1247. doi: 10.1002/pd.4239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mahadevan S, Wen S, Wan YW, Peng HH, Otta S, Liu Z, Iacovino M, Mahen EM, Kyba M, Sadikovic B, et al. NLRP7 affects trophoblast lineage differentiation, binds to overexpressed YY1 and alters CpG methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:706–716. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Manokhina I, Hanna CW, Stephenson MD, McFadden DE, Robinson WP. Maternal NLRP7 and C6orf221 variants are not a common risk factor for androgenetic moles, triploidy and recurrent miscarriage. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19:539–544. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Messaed C, Chebaro W, Di Roberto RB, Rittore C, Cheung A, Arseneau J, Schneider A, Chen MF, Bernishke K, Surti U, et al. NLRP7 in the spectrum of reproductive wastage: rare non-synonymous variants confer genetic susceptibility to recurrent reproductive wastage. J Med Genet. 2011;48:540–548. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2011.089144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Meyer E, Lim D, Pasha S, Tee LJ, Rahman F, Yates JR, Woods CG, Reik W, Maher ER. Germline mutation in NLRP2 (NALP2) in a familial imprinting disorder (Beckwith–Wiedemann Syndrome) PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Muhlstein J, Golfier F, Rittore C, Hajri T, Philibert L, Abel F, Beneteau C, Touitou I. The spectrum of NLRP7 mutations in French patients with recurrent hydatidiform mole. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157:197–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Murdoch S, Djuric U, Mazhar B, Seoud M, Khan R, Kuick R, Bagga R, Kircheisen R, Ao A, Ratti B, et al. Mutations in NALP7 cause recurrent hydatidiform moles and reproductive wastage in humans. Nat Genet. 2006;38:300–302. doi: 10.1038/ng1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Parry DA, Logan CV, Hayward BE, Shires M, Landolsi H, Diggle C, Carr I, Rittore C, Touitou I, Philibert L, et al. Mutations causing familial biparental hydatidiform mole implicate c6orf221 as a possible regulator of genomic imprinting in the human oocyte. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89:451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pierre A, Gautier M, Callebaut I, Bontoux M, Jeanpierre E, Pontarotti P, Monget P. Atypical structure and phylogenomic evolution of the new eutherian oocyte- and embryo-expressed KHDC1/DPPA5/ECAT1/OOEP gene family. Genomics. 2007;90:583–594. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qian J, Deveault C, Bagga R, Xie X, Slim R. Women heterozygous for NALP7/NLRP7 mutations are at risk for reproductive wastage: report of two novel mutations. Hum Mutat. 2007;28:741. doi: 10.1002/humu.9498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Qian J, Cheng Q, Murdoch S, Xu C, Jin F, Chebaro W, Zhang X, Gao H, Zhu Y, Slim R, et al. The genetics of recurrent hydatidiform moles in China: correlations between NLRP7 mutations, molar genotypes and reproductive outcomes. Mol Hum Reprod. 2011;17:612–619. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gar027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Radian AD, de Almeida L, Dorfleutner A, Stehlik C. NLRP7 and related inflammasome activating pattern recognition receptors and their function in host defense and disease. Microbes Infect. 2013;15:630–639. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368:601–611. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reddy R, Akoury E, Phuong Nguyen NM, Abdul-Rahman OA, Dery C, Gupta N, Daley WP, Ao A, Landolsi H, Ann Fisher R, et al. Report of four new patients with protein-truncating mutations in C6orf221/KHDC3L and colocalization with NLRP7. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;21:957–964. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rigon C, Andrisani A, Forzan M, D'Antona D, Bruson A, Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, Tiboni GM, Clementi M. Association study of AMH and AMHRII polymorphisms with unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1244–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rull K, Nagirnaja L, Laan M. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions. Front Genet. 2012;3:34. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. SART. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; 2010. IVF success rate. National data summary. http://www.sart.org. (27 August 2013, date last accessed) [Google Scholar]
  40. Slim R, Ao A, Surti U, Zhang L, Hoffner L, Arseneau J, Cheung A, Chebaro W, Wischmeijer A. Recurrent triploid and dispermic conceptions in patients with NLRP7 mutations. Placenta. 2011;32:409–412. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith JF, Eisenberg ML, Millstein SG, Nachtigall RD, Sadetsky N, Cedars MI, Katz PP G. Infertility Outcomes Program Project. Fertility treatments and outcomes among couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective fertility cohort in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Steck T, Giess R, Suetterlin MW, Bolland M, Wiest S, Poehls UG, Dietl J. Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) gene mutations in women with unexplained infertility and recurrent failure of implantation after IVF and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;112:69–73. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00315-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Su MT, Lin SH, Chen YC. Genetic association studies of angiogenesis- and vasoconstriction-related genes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:803–812. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Suzumori N, Sugiura-Ogasawara M. Genetic factors as a cause of miscarriage. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:3431–3437. doi: 10.2174/092986710793176302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tashiro F, Kanai-Azuma M, Miyazaki S, Kato M, Tanaka T, Toyoda S, Yamato E, Kawakami H, Miyazaki T, Miyazaki J. Maternal-effect gene Ces5/Ooep/Moep19/Floped is essential for oocyte cytoplasmic lattice formation and embryonic development at the maternal-zygotic stage transition. Genes Cells. 2010;15:813–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tian X, Pascal G, Fouchecourt S, Pontarotti P, Monget P. Gene birth, death, and divergence: the different scenarios of reproduction-related gene evolution. Biol Reprod. 2009a;80:616–621. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.073684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tian X, Pascal G, Monget P. Evolution and functional divergence of NLRP genes in mammalian reproductive systems. BMC Evol Biol. 2009b;9:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang CM, Dixon PH, Decordova S, Hodges MD, Sebire NJ, Ozalp S, Fallahian M, Sensi A, Ashrafi F, Repiska V, et al. Identification of 13 novel NLRP7 mutations in 20 families with recurrent hydatidiform mole; missense mutations cluster in the leucine-rich region. J Med Genet. 2009;46:569–575. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.064196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. World Health Organisation. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang P, Dixon M, Zucchelli M, Hambiliki F, Levkov L, Hovatta O, Kere J. Expression analysis of the NLRP gene family suggests a role in human preimplantation development. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES