Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2014 Oct 22;289(50):35003–35014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.586982

A Conserved Salt Bridge between Transmembrane Segments 1 and 10 Constitutes an Extracellular Gate in the Dopamine Transporter*

Anders V Pedersen 1, Thorvald F Andreassen 1, Claus J Loland 1,1
PMCID: PMC4263896  PMID: 25339174

Background: The presence of an extracellular gate in the dopamine transporter has been proposed.

Results: We use rescue mutations, zinc site engineering, and cysteine-reactive chemistry to establish the presence of the gate.

Conclusion: Arg-85 and Asp-476 constitute a functional thin gate in the dopamine transporter.

Significance: This gains further insight into the molecular mechanisms behind substrate transport by mammalian neurotransmitter transporters.

Keywords: Molecular Pharmacology, Monoamine Transporter, Neuroscience, Neurotransmitter Transport, Protein Structure, Structure-Function Relationship, Zinc Site Engineering

Abstract

Neurotransmitter transporters play an important role in termination of synaptic transmission by mediating reuptake of neurotransmitter, but the molecular processes behind translocation are still unclear. The crystal structures of the bacterial homologue, LeuT, provided valuable insight into the structural and dynamic requirements for substrate transport. These structures support the existence of gating domains controlling access to a central binding site. On the extracellular side, access is controlled by the “thin gate” formed by an interaction between Arg-30 and Asp-404. In the human dopamine transporter (DAT), the corresponding residues are Arg-85 and Asp-476. Here, we present results supporting the existence of a similar interaction in DAT. The DAT R85D mutant has a complete loss of function, but the additional insertion of an arginine in opposite position (R85D/D476R), causing a charge reversal, results in a rescue of binding sites for the cocaine analogue [3H]CFT. Also, the coordination of Zn2+ between introduced histidines (R85H/D476H) caused a ∼2.5-fold increase in [3H]CFT binding (Bmax). Importantly, Zn2+ also inhibited [3H]dopamine transport in R85H/D476H, suggesting that a dynamic interaction is required for the transport process. Furthermore, cysteine-reactive chemistry shows that mutation of the gating residues causes a higher proportion of transporters to reside in the outward facing conformation. Finally, we show that charge reversal of the corresponding residues (R104E/E493R) in the serotonin transporter also rescues [3H](S)-citalopram binding, suggesting a conserved feature. Taken together, these data suggest that the extracellular thin gate is present in monoamine transporters and that a dynamic interaction is required for substrate transport.

Introduction

The neurotransmitter:sodium symporters (NSSs)2 encompass a family of secondary active transporters that use the Na+ gradient across the plasma membrane as a driving force to transport solutes against their concentration gradient. Within the NSS family, we find the transporters for the monoamines dopamine (DA), norepinephrine, and serotonin. They are localized to the presynaptic terminals where they mediate rapid reuptake of the respective neurotransmitter and thereby control synaptic signaling tonus. Because of their central role in monoamine signaling, it is not surprising that the transporters are important pharmacological targets; the classical tricyclic antidepressants inhibit both the transporters for norepinephrine and serotonin (SERT), the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors inhibit SERT, and the stimulatory effects of cocaine and amphetamine are caused by the interaction of these compounds with SERT, norepinephrine transporter, and the dopamine transporter (DAT).

Despite their physiological and pharmacological importance, there are still many unanswered questions relating to the structural basis and molecular mechanisms behind substrate transport. Attempts to determine the tertiary structure of mammalian NSS proteins have so far proven unsuccessful mainly because of problems with obtaining sufficient amounts of purified protein of appropriate stability. These problems have been overcome by expression of either bacterial homologues to the mammalian NSS proteins, such as LeuT from Aquifex aeolicus (1), or invertebrate transporters, such as the Drosophila melanogaster DAT (dDAT) (2). LeuT is a Na+-coupled transporter with specificity for the hydrophobic amino acids glycine, alanine, methionine, and leucine (1, 3). High resolution structures of LeuT have revealed a protein with 12 transmembrane segments (TMs) organized in a pseudo 2-fold symmetry axis between TM1–5 and TM6–10 with a binding site for substrate localized central in the protein (S1 site) flanked by TM1, TM3, TM6, and TM8 (1). So far, LeuT has been crystallized in three distinct conformations: outward open, outward occluded, and an inward open conformation (1, 4). Although significant homology exists between LeuT and the mammalian NSS proteins, there are also divergent structures, including the loop domains and the much longer N and C termini found in the mammalian transporters. Despite these differences, LeuT has been used as a model protein for studying the dynamics and conformational changes that underlie substrate translocation in the mammalian NSS proteins (58). The recent crystallization of dDAT in an outward open conformation revealed a structural fold very similar to LeuT, supporting that LeuT is a valid model for eukaryotic NSS proteins at least for structural inferences (2).

It is believed that the accessibility to the central substrate binding site from either side of the membrane is controlled by the concerted movements of specific gating domains within the transporters (916). The constellation of the gating domains should be mediated by a network of dynamic interaction between specific residues. The existence of such “gating residues” has been confirmed by inferences from the crystal structures of LeuT. In the outward occluded conformation of LeuT, access to the S1 site from the extracellular side is blocked in part by a water-mediated salt bridge formed by an arginine in TM1 (Arg-30) and an aspartate in TM10 (Asp-404). In the outward facing conformation, the Arg-30/Asp-404 salt bridge is broken, resulting in the exposure of the substrate binding site to the extracellular aqueous environment (4), whereas the ionic interaction is direct without a water molecule present in the inward facing conformation (1, 4). Thus, according to the current crystal structures of LeuT, it is likely that Arg-30/Asp-404 forms a functionally important so-called “thin gate” as opposed to the “thick gate” on the intracellular side of the outward occluded conformation, which consists of 22 Å densely packed protein. Sequence alignment of the NSS members shows that the positive and negative charge in the two positions are almost completely conserved within the family (17), substantiating the importance of this putative gate in the function of this class of proteins. However, to date most inferences about the role of the interaction rely on the solved crystal structures of LeuT and molecular modeling of mammalian transporters based on the LeuT (1820); hence, whether the two residues also interact in mammalian NSS proteins and what role they have in substrate transport and inhibitor binding are yet to be established. Importantly, the role of the aspartate has been studied in the GABA transporter-1 (GAT-1), where it was shown that Asp-451, the cognate residue to Asp-404 in LeuT, only can be replaced by a glutamate if activity must be retained and that the D451E mutant shifts the conformational equilibrium of GAT-1 toward a more outward facing configuration (21). Further, the same group elegantly showed that the impaired transport efficiency in D451E can be rescued by a similar mutation in a presumed intracellular gating residue (D410E), suggesting a functional connectivity between the two (22).

In DAT, it has been proposed that, upon binding of dopamine, a hydrogen bond is formed between Asp-79 and Tyr-156 in TM3 (19). These apparent gating residues are located right above the binding site and could cause the initial closure of the external side, but this interaction is not conserved in LeuT and has no apparent connection to the more extracellularly located Arg-85 and Asp-476 (equivalent to Arg-30 and Asp-404 in LeuT). Here, we provide experimental data demonstrating the existence in DAT of a functional interaction between the conserved residues Arg-85 in TM1 and Asp-476 in TM10 (Fig. 1). First, we substantiate the functional importance of the two residues by showing that individual charge-reversing mutations at the two loci eliminate [3H]DA uptake and dramatically decrease Bmax for binding of the cocaine analogue ((-)-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane ([3H]CFT). Next, we find that charge reversal at both sites partially restores [3H]CFT binding, consistent with an interaction between the two residues. In further support of a structural and functional importance of the interaction between the two residues, we show that coordination of Zn2+ between inserted histidines in the two positions potentiates [3H]CFT binding and block [3H]DA uptake. Finally, we provide evidence for the presence of the corresponding salt bridge in the homologous SERT, and we demonstrate that mutational disruption of the putative interaction renders an inserted cysteine in position 159 (I159C) in TM3 more exposed to inactivation by the sulfhydryl-reactive agent, MTSET ([2-(trimethylammonium) ethyl]methane thiosulfonate), This suggests a shift of the transporter toward a more outward open configuration and supports an important role of the TM1/TM10 interaction in regulating conformational transitions in the transport cycle.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Presumed localization of the investigated residues in DAT. A, two-dimensional schematic representation of the human DAT. Red circles indicate the locations of the two investigated residues, Arg-85 and Asp-476, in TM1 and TM10, respectively. The open circles represent amino acid residues ordered in TMs and loop regions. The presumed glycosylation sites are indicated with small filled circles. B, molecular model of the human DAT based on the LeuT outward facing closed structure with dopamine (spheres in blue (carbons), gray (hydrogens), and red (oxygens)) docked in the center of the protein. Only a fraction of the protein is shown (gray helices and loops). The two presumed gating residues, Arg-85 and Asp-476, are depicted as orange sticks. The residues presumably closing the dopamine accessibility from the extracellular environment, Asp-79 and Tyr-165, are shown as thin black sticks. TM11 and 12 are removed for clarity.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Molecular Biology

We used a synthetic human DAT (synDAT) gene kindly provided by J. Javitch (Columbia University, New York, NY) that encodes a protein with an amino acid sequence identical to that of human DAT WT, but the nucleotide sequence was altered to increase the number of unique restriction sites and to optimize codon utilization (23). The synDAT were subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) for expression in COS7 cells. The human SERT was cloned into the mammalian expression vector pUbi1z (18). The E2C background construct was generated by mutations in the synDAT background of Cys-90 and Cys-306 to alanine. This construct was designated “E2C,” because the two extracellular cysteines were mutated. Introduction of an HA (human influenza hemagglutinin) antibody tag into the second extracellular loop of DAT WT (HA-DAT) was performed by introducing the HA sequence YPYDVPDYASL (one-letter amino acid codes) into the second extracellular loop by replacing the sequence (HPGDSSGDSSG) in positions 193–203. All mutations were generated by the QuikChange method (adapted from Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) or two-step PCR using Pfu polymerase with either synDAT WT, synDAT H193K, or synDAT E2C as template. Subcloning in synDAT were performed using ClaI/KpnI for mutations in position 85 and NheI/Xba for substitutions of Asp-476. Subcloning into HA-DAT was performed with KpnI and XhoI. Similarly, in human SERT, NotI/PvuI or NheI/XbaI combinations were used for R104D and D493R, respectively. For expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes, mutants were transferred from pcDNA3 synDAT to pXOOM (24) synDAT vector using a BamHI (New England Biolabs) dual site. cRNA was generated as run-off transcripts from pXOOM synDAT vector linearized with PmeI using T7 mESSAGE-mMACHINE (Ambion) and purified using Megaclear (Ambion) following the manufacturer's instructions. All mutations were confirmed by restriction enzyme mapping and DNA sequencing (MWG Eurofins). Positive clones were amplified by transformation into XL1 blue competent cells (Stratagene), and the positive colony was picked and grown in LB medium overnight at 37 °C in an orbital incubator (Infors) at 200 rpm. Plasmids were harvested using the maxi prep kit provided by Qiagen.

Cell Culture and Transfection

COS7 cells were maintained at 37 °C in 10% CO2 in DMEM (in house) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mm l-glutamine, and 0.01 mg/ml gentamicin (all from Invitrogen). One day prior to transfection, 6 × 106 cells were seeded in 175-cm2 flasks. All constructs were transiently transfected into COS7 cells using Lipo2000 according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). Stage V defoliculated Xenopus laevis oocytes were ordered from EcoCyte BioScience. Oocytes were injected with ∼50 ng of cRNA and incubated in Kulori's medium (88 mm NaCl, 1 mm KCl, 1 mm MgCl2, 1 mm CaCl2, 5 mm Hepes-Tris) at 18 °C for ∼5 days, or until use.

Membrane Preparation

Membranes were prepared from COS7 cells 2 days after transient transfection with human SERT WT or mutant plasmid using the Lipo2000 transfection protocol (Invitrogen) as described previously (18). After detachment, cells were lysed with two ultrasound bursts (Branson Sonifier with microtip) in membrane buffer (120 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 1.2 mm CaCl2, 1.2 mm MgSO4, 25 mm Hepes, pH 7.5), pelleted (4900 × g for 10 min (Sigma SK15 swing-out rotor)), and resuspended in membrane buffer containing 0.3 m sucrose.

Uptake Experiments

Uptake assays were performed on intact cells essentially as described (25) using 3,4-[Ring-2,5,6-3H]-dihydroxyphenylethylamine ([3H]DA) (30–60 Ci/mmol) (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Briefly, transfected COS7 cells were plated in either 24-well dishes (105 cells/well) or 12-well dishes (3 × 105 cells/well) coated with polyornithine (Sigma) to achieve an uptake level of no more than 10% of total added [3H]DA. The uptake assays were carried out 2 days after transfection in uptake buffer (UB) (25 mm Hepes, 130 mm NaCl, 5.4 mm KCl, 1.2 mm CaCl2, 1.2 mm MgSO4, 1 mm l-ascorbic acid, 5 mm d-glucose, and 1 μm of the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor Ro 41-0960 (Sigma), pH 7.4). Prior to the experiment, the cells were washed once in 500 μl of UB, and the nonlabeled compound was added to the cells in the indicated concentrations in a total volume of 500 μl. The assay was initiated by the addition of 6–10 nm [3H]DA. Nonspecific uptake was determined with 1 μm nomifensine (Sigma-Aldrich). After 5 min of incubation at room temperature, the cells were washed twice with 500 μl of ice-cold UB, lysed in 250 μl (24 wells) or 300 μl (12 wells) of 1% SDS, and left for >30 min at 37 °C. All samples were transferred to 24-well counting plates (PerkinElmer Life Sciences), and 500 μl (24 wells) or 600 μl (12 wells) of Opti-phase Hi Safe 3 scintillation fluid (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) was added followed by counting of the plates in a Wallac Tri-Lux β-scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). All experiments were carried out with 12 determinations of DA or Zn2+ concentrations ranging from 10 nm to 1 mm performed in triplicate.

[3H]CFT Binding Experiments

Binding assays were carried out essentially as described for the uptake experiments on whole cells only using [3H]2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane ([3H]CFT or [3H]WIN 35,428) (76–87 Ci/mmol) (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Previous to the binding experiment, cells were washed once in ice-cold UB, and after the addition of unlabeled compound in the indicated concentrations and [3H]CFT, the reactions were incubated at 5 °C until equilibrium were obtained (>100 min). All experiments were carried out with 12 determinations of CFT (concentration range, 0.1 nm to 0.1 mm) or Zn2+ (concentration range, 10 nm to 1 mm) performed in triplicate.

[3H]CFT Dissociation Rate Experiments

Prior to the assay, COS7 cells were treated and transfected with the indicated DAT mutants as described above for the uptake and binding experiments. Binding of [3H]CFT were initiated by the addition of 4 nm [3H]CFT (76.6 Ci/mmol) in 450 μl of UB and placed at 4 °C. After 1 h the medium was aspirated, cells were washed twice with UB (room temperature) and 0.5 ml of UB (room temperature) with 50 μm nomifensine (to inhibit reassociation of [3H]CFT) were added at t = 0. For the Zn2+ experiments, Zn2+ (200 μm) were added, and the plates were incubated for 10 min (room temperature) prior to the initiation of dissociation. The UB also contained 200 μm Zn2+ during the dissociation period. The reaction was stopped by the aspiration of UB at the indicated time points, and the cells were lysed and counted as previously described. All determinations were performed in triplicate.

[3H](S)-Citalopram Binding Experiments

The (S)-citalopram (S-CIT) binding to SERT WT and mutants was determined by the addition of 3–5 nm [3H]S-CIT in binding buffer together with increasing concentrations of S-CIT in the concentration range from 0.01 to 10,000 nm (12 determinations in triplicate) in 96-well plates. Subsequently, membranes expressing human SERT WT or mutants were added to a total volume of 400 μl. The binding mixture was incubated for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently filtered, washed, and counted as described for the dissociation rate assay. Nonspecific binding was determined by adding 5 μm paroxetine.

ELISA for Quantification of Cell Surface Expression

Two days after transfection, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After 30 min of blocking of unspecific sites with PBS supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum, anti-HA antibody coupled to the horseradish peroxidase (80 milliunits/ml, clone 3F10; Roche) was applied for 30 min at room temperature in the same buffer. After intense washes with PBS, the antibody was detected and quantified instantaneously by chemiluminescence using Supersignal ELISA femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Pierce) and a Wallac Victor2 luminescence counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). All experiments were performed at least in triplicate.

Electrophysiology

Xenopus oocytes were voltage clamped similar to previously reported methods (26) using Dagan CA1-B (Dagan Corporation), connected to a PC with Digidata 1440A (Axon Instruments) and controlled with pClamp 9.2 (Axon Instruments). An Ag/AgCl grounding electrode was connected to the recording chamber via a 2 m KCl, 2% agarose bridge to minimize liquid junction potential offsets. Current was acquired every 0.1 ms, and 50 Hz interference was off-line filtered using the built-in functions of Clampfit 9.2 (Axon Instruments). All oocytes were clamped in 20-mV steps between −100 mV (250 ms) and +40 mV (250 ms) and returned to the holding potential of −60 mV (250 ms) prior to each voltage step. All buffers were gravity perfused, and current voltage relationships (I/V) were analyzed on steady-state currents using Origin 8 (Origin lab). The cocaine-sensitive current is defined as (IICOC). All recording buffers include: 2.5 mm KCl, 1.8 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 1 mm Hepes-Tris.

MTSET Labeling Experiments

Two days after transfection, COS7 cells expressing either the DAT E2C background construct or mutations herein and seeded in 12- or 24-well plates were washed once with 500 μl of UB. Subsequently, MTSET ([2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-methanethiosulfonate)(Toronto Research Chemicals, Toronto, Canada) was added at a final concentration of 0.5 mm, and the cells were incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The stock MTSET solution was freshly prepared in H2O and immediately diluted 10-fold by application to the transfected cells into a final volume of 500 μl of UB. After incubation, the cells were washed three times in 500 μl of UB at room temperature before initiation of [3H]DA uptake, performed as described above, but here only the maximal uptake (without unlabeled DA) and the nonspecific uptake (in the presence of 1 μm nomifensine) were determined, both in triplicate. The reaction was stopped, and uptake was counted as described above. The effects of the added compound on MTSET reactivity were determined by calculating the effect of preincubation with the compound alone and with MTSET all performed in parallel on the same plate using triplicate determinations.

Data Calculations and Statistical Analysis

Uptake data were analyzed by nonlinear regression analysis using Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). The IC50 values used in the estimation of Km and Kd values were calculated from means of pIC50 values and S.E. interval from pIC50 ± S.E. The Ki values were calculated from the IC50 values using the equation Ki = IC50/(1 + (L + KX), where X is either M or d, whether it is an uptake or binding assay, respectively, and L is the concentration of [3H]radioligand). For comparisons between two groups, a t test (two-tailed) was performed.

RESULTS

Reversal of the Proposed Salt Bridge Residues Partly Restores Binding

To evaluate a possible interaction between Arg-85 and Asp-476 in DAT, we first mutated either Arg-85 or Asp-476 into alanines and measured the impact on DAT functionality in terms of DA transport capacity and binding of the high affinity cocaine analogue CFT on intact COS7 cells transiently transfected with DAT WT or mutants. In agreement with a critical role of both residues, neither DAT R85A nor DAT D476A possessed any measurable [3H]DA transport or [3H]CFT binding activity (data not shown). This result concurs with previous data in GAT-1 showing that mutation of the residue corresponding to Asp-476 (Asp-451) to either a cysteine, asparagine, or serine renders the transporter devoid of any measurable transport (21).

To further investigate the possible relationship between the residues, we tested the consequences of reversing the charges at the two loci (R85D and D476R). Accordingly, we constructed the single mutants R85D and D476R, as well as the double mutant with reverted residues, R85D/D476R. The mutants were transiently transfected into COS7 cells and assessed for [3H]DA uptake and [3H]CFT binding. Mutation of Arg-85 to aspartate (R85D) caused a complete loss of any measurable [3H]CFT binding, as well as [3H]DA transport (Fig. 2, A and B, and Table 1). Likewise, [3H]DA uptake could not be measured in the D476R mutant. However, we did observe significant [3H]CFT binding in D476R, although it was only ∼10% of DAT WT but with a similar affinity (Table 1). Interestingly, introducing D476R into the nonfunctional R85D mutant resulted in a marked increase in binding capacity relative to the R85D single mutant, up to ∼10% of WT (Fig. 2B and Table 1). However, we were not able to measure any [3H]DA transport in R85D/D476R, showing that charge reversal is only compatible with [3H]CFT binding but not with transport (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Reversal of the presumed salt bridge residues can partly rescue DAT function. A, [3H]DA uptake capacity of the DAT WT and mutants with either a single (R85D and D476R) or both charges (R85D/D476R) reversed. Neither of the mutants were able to accumulate [3H]DA distinguishable from the background signal. B, binding of the high affinity cocaine analogue [3H]CFT to DAT WT and mutants. For the DAT R85D mutant, the binding of [3H]CFT was indistinguishable from the background signal. Both the DAT D476R and DAT R85D/D476R gave Bmax values ∼10% of the WT signal (Table 1). C, transporter surface expression as quantified by ELISA on intact COS7 cells transiently transfected with a DAT background construct that has a HA tag inserted into the second extracellular loop. The data are means ± S.E. with the DAT WT expression set as 100% in all experiments. The surface expression of the indicated DAT mutants were 22 ± 3, 21 ± 3, and 28 ± 5% for R85D, D476R, and R85D/D476R, respectively, relative to the WT transporter. D, inhibition of [3H]CFT binding by DA in DAT WT (black squares) and DAT R85D/D476R (red circles). DA is able to displace [3H]CFT binding both in the DAT WT (Ki = 0.91 (0.66; 1.26) μm, mean (S.E. interval), n = 5) and in the DAT R85D/D476R (Ki = 15 (11, 20) μm, mean (S.E. interval), n = 4). All experiments are performed in triplicate with a concentration range of CFT (0.1 nm to 100 μm) or DA (1 nm to 1 mm) in 12 determinations on intact COS7 cells transiently transfected with DAT WT or indicated mutant.

TABLE 1.

Bmax and affinity for CFT and dopamine to DAT WT and mutants

Experiments performed on transient transfected COS7 cells expressing DAT WT or indicated mutants. The Kd and Bmax values of CFT binding and the Ki for DA displacement were calculated from nonlinear regression analysis of [3H]CFT binding in the presence increasing concentrations of unlabeled ligand (CFT or DA) using 11 consecutive concentrations performed in triplicate. The IC50 values used in the estimation of Kd and Ki values were calculated from means of pIC50 values and the S.E. interval from the pIC50 ± S.E. ND, not detectable.

DAT construct CFT Bmax CFT
DA
Kd N Ki N
fmol/105 cells nm μm
WT 284 ± 31 18 (16; 21) 9 0.91 (0.66; 1.26) 5
R85D ND ND 8 ND 4
D476R 32 ± 3 6.7 (5.2; 8.5) 6 12 (8.7; 19) 4
R85D/D476R 37 ± 4 7.6 (5.1; 11) 4 15 (11; 20) 4

The rescue of [3H]CFT binding in R85D/D476R compared with R85D alone could be due either to an increase in surface expression or to a re-establishment of intact binding sites in the expressed transporters. To determine whether the observed differences were an effect of a change in surface expression, we introduced an HA antibody tag into the second extracellular loop of DAT WT as described (27). Insertion of the HA tag permitted quantification of DAT surface expression by ELISA. In agreement with previous investigations (28), the HA tag insertion did not perturb [3H]DA uptake and [3H]CFT binding in DAT WT (Table 2). Furthermore, we observed the same phenotype of the charge reversal mutations, i.e. introducing D476R into HA-DAT R85D, resulted in rescue of [3H]CFT binding to the same extent as without HA tag present (Table 2). The ELISA data on HA-tagged DAT WT and mutant transporters showed that all mutations, R85D, D476R, and R85D/D476R, decreased the surface expressed DAT protein to ∼20% of WT expression (surface expression as a percentage of WT: R85D, 22 ± 3; D476R, 21 ± 3; and R85D/D476R, 28 ± 5; Fig. 2C). Although there was a tendency for R85D/D476R to express more than the single mutants, the difference was not significant (Student's unpaired t test, R85D/D476R versus R85D and D476R, p = 0.15 and 0.18, respectively). When comparing the degree of surface expression to the observed Bmax values, it is clear that the restored binding in R85D/D476R, as compared with R85D alone, cannot be solely the result of restored surface expression, but rather from a reestablishment of the CFT binding site by the introduction of the D476R mutation. It is important to note that full rescue of [3H]CFT binding would not be expected because the putative interaction between the two residues is likely stabilized by other neighboring residues that presumably only will be able to form suboptimal interactions when the residues are swapped.

TABLE 2.

Bmax and affinity for CFT and dopamine to HA tagged DAT WT and mutants

Experiments performed and data calculated as described in Table I, only here on a DAT background construct with and inserted HA tag in the ECL 2 (see “Experimental Procedures” for details). The data are shown as means (S.E. interval) calculated from pIC50 ± S.E. ND, not detectable.

DAT construct CFT
Bmax Kd N
fmol/105 cells nm
HA-WT 210 ± 74 9.8 (7.5; 13) 3
HA-R85D ND ND 3
HA-D476R 43 ± 9 31 (21; 47) 4
HA-R85D/D476R 35 ± 8 20 (12; 36) 4

To further characterize the double mutant, we wanted to assess whether the loss of [3H]DA transport was due to the loss of DA binding or whether it was a mechanistic perturbation of the translocation mechanism. Accordingly, we assessed the potency of DA to inhibit binding of [3H]CFT to R85D/D476R. This showed that DA was able to displace the bound [3H]CFT albeit with a 16-fold lower potency than in the WT (Fig. 2D and Table 1). This suggests that DA is still able to bind to the double mutant but that the actual translocation mechanism is perturbed.

Mutation of the Salt Bridge Causes a Complete Inhibition of the Leak Currents

To assess whether the lack of uptake was due to a massive depolarization of the cell membrane, e.g. due to an increased leak current, we performed an electrophysiological characterization of the DAT mutants. Accordingly, we evaluated DAT-mediated currents using two-electrode voltage clamp on Xenopus oocytes expressing DAT WT, R85D, D476R, or R85D/D476R. As previously reported (29), the WT possessed a minor cocaine sensitive outward rectifying leak current at negative potentials (Fig. 3A; 6.1 ± 3.5 nA (mean ± S.E., n = 5) at −60 mV). We were not able to determine similar leak currents in either of our mutant transporters (Fig. 3B–D). When substituting Na+ (130 mm) with Li+, the DAT-mediated leak current increased substantially to −255 ± 35 nA (mean ± S.E., n = 5) at −60 mV. A similar effect has previously been reported for the mouse DAT (26) and the GAT-1 (30, 31). Interestingly, again we were not able to measure any leak current by any of the reverting mutants, suggesting an abolishment of the leak current induced conformation in all three mutants. Thus, the lack of [3H]DA uptake in the is not due to an increased leak current causing a massive depolarization of the cell membrane. Notably, the holding potential at unclamped conditions was not different between the oocytes expressing WT and mutants, suggesting that the lack of transport is not due to a change in the membrane potential; also we were not able to measure any DA-induced current in any of the mutants either (data not shown).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Mutations to the proposed salt bridge do not permit Li+-sensitive leak in the transporter. A–D, I/V plots of steady-state cocaine sensitive leak currents in WT, R85D, D476R, and the double mutant R85D/D476R assessed in 130 mm NaCl (open black squares) and 130 mm LiCl (open red circles) means ± S.E. (n = 4–5). The inwardly rectifying leak current observed in WT when substituting NaCl with LiCl is not observed when mutating residues in the proposed outer gate (B–D). The I/V plots were generated in 20-mV steps from −100 to +40 mV.

Conversion of the Salt Bridge to a Zn2+ Binding Site Restores Binding Capacity

The partial rescue of [3H]CFT binding in the double mutant is consistent with the presence of a direct interaction between Arg-85 and Asp-476, but we cannot exclude a conformational rescue because of indirect allosteric effects by the inserted residues. To determine whether the two positions in TM1 and TM10 indeed are in close proximity of each other and thereby likely to interact, we employed zinc site engineering. The coordination of Zn2+ in proteins is well established from crystal structures of multiple Zn2+-binding proteins such as DNA binding Zn2+ finger proteins and enzymes (32, 33). We hypothesized that if an arginine in position 85 in TM1 and an aspartate in position 476 in TM10 can interact in WT DAT, it should be possible to engineer a bidentate Zn2+ binding site between the two helices with a Zn2+ coordinating residue in each of the two positions (e.g. His, Cys, Asp, or Glu). Indeed, substituting Arg-85 and Asp-476 with histidine residues in a DA-bound DAT model (19), based on the outward occluded structure of LeuT, shows that the possible distance between the histidine nitrogens can be below 4 Å, which is within range for a tight Zn2+ coordination (Fig. 4A) (34). Histidine residues were accordingly inserted in positions 85 and/or 476 in a DAT background construct where the endogenous Zn2+ binding site (3537) has been removed (DAT H193K). In contrast to the charge reversal mutants, both R85H/H193K and H193K/D476H retained [3H]CFT binding properties similar to WT. Also, the Km value for [3H]DA was retained, but the transport activity (Vmax) was reduced with the highest effect observed on the R85H/H193K mutant (Table 3). This suggests that a charged pair of residues is not required per se to maintain the [3H]CFT binding site but has a critical impact on DA transport. In the double histidine mutant (R85H/H193K/D476H), Bmax for [3H]CFT binding was reduced ∼50% (Table 3), whereas [3H]DA transport activity was reduced to ∼10% of WT (Table 3). As for the single His mutants, the Km value for R85H/H193K/D476H was similar to what was observed for the DAT H193K background mutant.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Functional analysis of the TM1/TM10 interaction by Zn2+ binding to the histidine substituted mutant DAT R85H-D476H. A, the molecular docking model of DAT from Fig. 1 here with inserted histidines in positions 85 and 476 (orange sticks). The distance between possible coordinating histidines, here exemplified as an interaction between the π (δ1) and τ (ϵ2) nitrogens, is 3.8 Å, which is within Zn2+ coordinating distance. B, the addition of Zn2+ to R85H/D476H (red circles) dose-dependently increases [3H]CFT binding to 243 ± 19% (mean ± S.E., n = 8) in 1 mm Zn2+ relative to no Zn2+ present. The effect was observed when applying subsaturating concentrations of [3H]CFT together with increasing concentrations of Zn2+ up to a final concentration of 1 mm. No effect of Zn2+ on [3H]CFT binding was observed on either R85H (black squares) or D476H (black triangles) single mutants (n = 7). C, Zn2+ decreases off rate of bound [3H]CFT to the R85H/D476H mutant. The dissociation rate constant (K) for [3H]CFT from R85H/D476H shows a 5-fold decrease by the addition of 200 μm Zn2+, from 0.076 ± 0.0038 min−1 (black circles) to 0.015 ± 0.0015 min−1 (cyan squares) (mean ± S.E., n = 7). No effect of Zn2+ on dissociation was observed in the R85H, D476H, or H193K background mutants (data in text). D, transport of [3H]DA by R85H/D476H is inhibited by the addition of Zn2+. The uptake capacity by R85H/D476H is markedly decreased relative to the DAT H193K background construct but still within the detection limit of the assay (Table 3). The addition of Zn2+ to R85H/D476H (red circles) results in a dose-dependent inhibition of [3H]DA uptake (Ki = 2.6 [2.1;3.1] μm, mean[S.E. interval], n = 3). The effect of Zn2+ on the single mutants R85H (squares) and D476H (triangles) were indistinguishable from the Zn2+ effect on the background mutant H193K reported previously (36). All mutations were performed in the background of the Zn2+-insensitive mutant DAT H193K. The data are means ± S.E. performed in triplicate on COS7 cells transiently transfected with the indicated mutants.

TABLE 3.

Binding and uptake characteristics for histidine mutants introduced into the DAT H193K background

Experiments performed on transient transfected COS7 cells expressing the Zn2+-insensitive DAT H193K background or mutants herein. The Kd and Bmax values of CFT binding and the Km and Vmax for DA uptake were calculated from nonlinear regression analysis of accumulated [3H]radioligand in the presence increasing concentrations of unlabeled ligand (CFT or DA) using 11 consecutive concentrations performed in triplicate. Nonspecific [3H]DA uptake or [3H]CFT binding were determined with 1 μm nomifensine. The IC50 values used in the estimation of Kd and Km values were calculated from means of pIC50 values and the S.E. interval from the pIC50 ± S.E. The Bmax and Vmax values are shown as means ± S.E. ND, not detectable.

DAT construct CFT
DA
Bmax Kd N Vmax Km N
fmol/105 cells nm fmol/105 cells/min μm
H193K 191 ± 12 15 (12; 190) 3 6300 ± 1100 1.7 (0.9; 3.5) 4
H193K/R85H 209 ± 28 36 (25; 51) 3 430 ± 119 3.1 (1.7; 5.6) 5
H193K/D476H 205 ± 28 44 (36; 54) 3 1421 ± 131 2.0 (1.3; 3.1) 3
H193K/R85H/D476H 89 ± 11 13 (11; 16) 4 463 ± 33 3.7 (2.5; 5.4) 8
H193K/R85H/D476H + 200 μm Zn2+ 201 ± 21 17 (15; 19) 4 ND ND 3

The effect of Zn2+ on [3H]CFT binding was measured in both R85H/H193K and H193K/D476H and in the bis-His mutant. As shown in Fig. 4B, Zn2+ caused a dose-dependent increase in [3H]CFT binding in the R85H/H193K/D476H mutant with a maximum of 243 ± 19% compared with when no Zn2+ was present (Fig. 4B; mean ± S.E., n = 8). The potentiating [3H]CFT binding by Zn2+ was only observed for the bis-His mutant and not for mutants with only a single histidine inserted into the Zn2+-insensitive background, i.e. R85H/H193K and H193K/D476H (Fig. 4B). This suggests that both histidine residues must be present to coordinate Zn2+ binding between the two positions in order for Zn2+ to potentiate [3H]CFT binding. The effect was only seen with Zn2+; neither Cu2+, Ni2+ Ag2+, nor Cu2+-phenantroline displayed any potentiating effect on [3H]CFT binding (data not shown). The insertion of cysteine residues, either in combination with a histidine (R85H/D476C or R85C/D476H) or at both sites (R85C/D476C) in the DAT H193K background did not result in any [3H]CFT binding potentiation by Zn2+ or any other of the tested divalent cations (data not shown). Thus, the potentiating effect of Zn2+ in the bis-His mutant is specific for the histidines and unlikely caused by unspecific effects caused by the mutation of the two residues.

To further validate the existence of a bidentate Zn2+ binding site between R85H and D476H, we investigated the effect of Zn2+ on dissociation of prebound [3H]CFT. Our previous data have demonstrated that the binding site for cocaine and cocaine analogues like CFT is situated in the primary substrate binding cavity (S1) overlapping with the binding site of DA (19). Thus, the CFT binding site is situated below the putative thin gate presumably formed by the Arg-85/Asp-476 interaction. We hypothesized accordingly that forcing a structural constraint between position 85 and 476 with Zn2+ should trap prebound [3H]CFT in S1 and thus decrease the dissociation rate of [3H]CFT from DAT. COS7 cells expressing R85H/H193K/D476H was preincubated with [3H]CFT, before measuring the dissociation rate in the absence and presence of 200 μm Zn2+ (Fig. 4C). In the absence of Zn2+, [3H]CFT dissociates from the DAT bis-His mutant with a dissociation rate constant (K) of 0.076 ± 0.0038 min−1 (mean ± S.E., n = 7; Fig. 4C) in agreement with previous results (19). In the presence of Zn2+, however, the dissociation rate constant decreased 5-fold (K = 0.015 ± 0.0015 min−1, mean ± S.E., n = 7; Fig. 4C), suggesting that the coordination of Zn2+ between His-85 and His-476 occludes the path from the CFT binding site to the extracellular environment. We did not observe any significant effect of Zn2+ on [3H]CFT dissociation from the DAT H193K background or from the single His mutants (fold change in [3H]CFT dissociation rate constants between DAT mutants incubated with or without the presence of 200 μm Zn2+ (buffer:Zn2+ ratio): H193K, 1.25 ± 0.17 min−1; R85H/H193K, 1.15 ± 0.13 min−1; and H193K/D476H, 0.80 ± 0.09 min−1 mean ± S.E., n = 3).

We also tested the effect of Zn2+ on [3H]DA transport in R85H/H193K/D476H. Whereas no effect of Zn2+ is seen in the background mutant H193K (36) or when R85H and D476H are individually inserted into H193K (Fig. 4D), Zn2+ potently inhibited [3H]DA uptake in R85H/H193K/D476H (IC50 = 2.6 [2.1–3.1] μm; Fig. 4D). In addition, to further substantiate that Zn2+ can coordinate been between R85H and D476H, the results support that dynamic TM1/TM10 interactions and not simple static proximity between the two helices are required for transport.

Mutation of Arg-85/Asp-476 Renders DAT in a More Open to Out Conformation

We hypothesize that the putative Arg-85/Asp-476 salt bridge is involved in the conformational isomerization of the transporter by operating as an external thin gate that occludes the accessibility to the substrate binding site from the extracellular environment. It would therefore be expected that breakage of the proposed salt bridge results in a changed isomerization, presumably by shifting the conformational equilibrium toward a higher fraction of transporters residing in the outward open conformation at any given time. A way to determine such a change in the conformational equilibrium of DAT is to use cysteine-reactive compounds directed toward a cysteine incorporated into the extracellular vestibule of DAT. When the cysteine-reactive and cell-impermeable compound MTSET reacts with the cysteine residue, the transport process is inhibited. It has been shown for DAT (10, 38), norepinephrine transporter (14), and SERT (14) that a cysteine inserted into TM3 (corresponding to Ile-159 in DAT) is differentially exposed to the extracellular environment depending on the conformational state of the transporters; when the extracellular gate is open, MTSET can react and thus inhibit subsequent transport, whereas when the gate is closed, Cys-159 is protected, and transport is preserved (10, 38). For the experiments, we used a DAT background construct (E2C) with two endogenous extracellular cysteines (C90A and C306A) removed, rendering DAT insensitive to MTSET reactivity. We expressed the construct in COS7 cells and monitored its reactivity by incubating for 5 min with MTSET (0.5 mm) and measured the effect on subsequent [3H]DA transport. In agreement with previous data (10), the [3H]DA transport by E2C I159C were inhibited by the application of MTSET with 12.0 ± 1.1% relative to no MTSET addition (Fig. 5). Next, we tested the effect of mutating the Arg-85 or Asp-476 on the Cys-159 reactivity. The insertion of either R85H, D476H, or D476N into E2C I159C (E2C R85H/I159C, E2C I159C/D476H, or E2C I159C/D476N) resulted in a significant increase in the [3H]DA uptake inhibition by MTSET to 43 ± 8, 37 ± 10, and 32 ± 7%, respectively (Fig. 5). We were not able to assess the effect of MTSET reactivity in the charge reversal mutations (R85D, D476R, and R85D/D476R) because they possessed no measurable uptake capacity (Fig. 2A). These data suggest that even conservative mutations (R85H and D476N) in the two positions resulted in an increased accessibility to Cys-159, probably because of a changed conformational equilibrium caused by the modification of the proposed salt bridge.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Mutation of Arg-85 or Asp-476 increases accessibility to Cys-159. Insertion of a cysteine in position 159 into the MTSET-insensitive DAT background E2C (C90A/C306A), DAT E2C I159C, can be used as a tool to probe for accessibility for Cys-159 to the extracellular environment. Preincubation with MTSET (0.5 mm, 5 min) to DAT E2C I159C results in an inhibition of [3H]DA uptake of 12.0 ± 1.1%. The additional mutation of R85H, D476N, or D476H resulted in a significantly increased [3H]DA uptake inhibition by MTSET to 43 ± 8, 37 ± 10, and 32 ± 7%, respectively. The data are means ± S.E. (n = 5–8) performed in triplicate on COS7 cells transiently transfected with the indicated mutants.

The TM1/TM10 Interaction Is Also Present in SERT

We then investigated whether the interaction between Arg-85 and Asp-476 was present also in other mammalian NSS proteins. The arginine residue is conserved within the mammalian NSS family, whereas the cognate position of the Asp-476 is a glutamate residue in SERT (Glu-493). Analogous to the DAT experiments, we generated charge reversal mutations of the aligned residues in SERT and measured their functionality in terms of possible rescue of high affinity [3H]S-CIT binding. Accordingly, we generated the SERT mutants R104E, E493R, and R104E/E493R; expressed them in COS7 cells; and measured [3H]S-CIT binding on membrane preparations of transiently transfected cells. Interestingly, for the single mutants, the binding properties were opposite as those seen for the DAT mutants. In SERT, it was R104E that possessed remaining binding activity of ∼30% compared with WT, whereas E493R had no measurable binding. This could be due to the fact that SERT also has a glutamine residue in position 494, which could substitute for the missing Glu-493 as has been observed in GAT-1 (21). Otherwise, the pattern was similar to our observations in DAT, namely that introducing R104E in E493R mutant restored binding to ∼30% of WT capacity (Fig. 6 and Table 4) with a less than 2-fold decrease in affinity. These data suggest that the cognate residues in SERT also interact in a way similar to our observations in DAT, only with a switched impact on binding for the two residues.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

The TM1/TM10 interaction is also present in SERT. Mutation of the aligned position to Asp-476 in SERT (E493R) completely abolishes any detectable [3H]S-CIT binding. Mutation of R104E in SERT E493R (SERT R104E/E493R) restores binding to ∼30% of SERT WT levels ([3H]S-CIT Bmax (fmol/100 μl of membrane) SERT WT = 468 ± 32; SERT R104E/E493R = 152 ± 10). Mutation of R104E alone reduces [3H]S-CIT binding to an approximately similar level as the double mutant (SERT R104E, Bmax = 468 ± 32 fmol/100 μl of membrane). All data are shown as Bmax values of three experiments performed in triplicate as described under “Experimental Procedures.”

TABLE 4.

Bmax and affinity for S-CIT on SERT WT and mutants

Experiments performed on membrane preparations from COS7 cells transiently expressing SERT WT or indicated mutants. The Kd and Bmax values of S-CIT binding were calculated from nonlinear regression analysis of [3H]S-CIT binding in the presence increasing concentrations of unlabeled S-CIT using 11 consecutive concentrations performed in triplicate. The IC50 values used in the estimation of Kd values were calculated from means of pIC50 values and the S.E. interval from the pIC50 ± S.E. ND, not detectable.

SERT construct S-CIT
Bmax Kd N
fmol/100 μl of membrane nm
WT 468 ± 32 2.8 (2.5; 3.3) 3
R104D 139 ± 24 4.8 (3.2; 7.2) 3
D493R ND ND 3
R104D/D493R 152 ± 10 4.5 (3.5; 5.6) 3

DISCUSSION

The family of NSS proteins is thought to function by an alternating access mechanism, which requires the presence of gates that mediate alternated accessibility to the central substrate binding site from either the extracellular or intracellular environment. Inferences from crystal structures have provided valuable information about the likely nature of these gates, but their presence and implication in the translocation mechanism in the mammalian NSS proteins are still to be determined in detail. Here, we provide experimental data suggesting that a pair of two highly conserved residues in DAT (Arg-85 in TM1 and Asp-476 in TM10) forms a dynamic interaction that is critical for the translocation of substrate, as well as for stabilizing the binding site for the cocaine analogue, CFT.

The charge reversal experiments show that it is possible to restore binding in the completely nonfunctional mutant, DAT R85D, by the insertion of an arginine residue (D476R) in the opposing position. The D476R per se does also perturb function; therefore in a nonrescue situation, one would expect a nonfunctional double mutant. Thus, we interpret the restoration of [3H]CFT binding in the DAT R85D/D476R mutant, with affinity comparable with WT, as a rescue situation. The absence of a complete rescue in R85D/D476R is not surprising because the swapped positions are unlikely to permit an ideal coordination of the residues relative to each other. In addition, the swapped residues will most likely form suboptimal interactions with neighboring residues, leading to potential destabilization of the protein. An example of a possible residue is the Asp-313 in TM6, which could cause suboptimal coordination of the inserted aspartate residue in the R85D/D476R. However, mutation of Asp-313 did not change the binding properties in the R85D/D476R mutant (data not shown). Of interest, we have previously performed a similar charge reversal/rescue experiment on residues constituting part of the intracellular gate in DAT (Arg-30 and Asp-436) (28). In this case, we were also only able to obtain a partial rescue (28). The partial rescue is further substantiated by the complete lack of leak currents in all mutants. It has previously been suggested that the leak current is induced by the inward facing conformation (26, 39), suggesting that the suboptimal coordination in the R85D/D476R is not sufficient for the transporter to isomerize to the inward facing conformation and thus not mediate transport. It was, however, able to bind DA albeit with lower affinity. In this context, it is interesting to note that the interaction has to undergo several dynamic changes during the translocation cycle. According to available crystal structures of LeuT, the charged pair form a water-mediated salt bridge in the outward occluded state but a direct salt bridge in the inward facing configuration. In the outward facing conformation of both LeuT and dDAT, the residues are too far apart to interact (2, 4). Likely, the charge reversal does not support this dynamic feature. This was further substantiated by zinc site engineering. We have previously taken advantage of this approach in our study of this class of proteins where it has contributed to the elucidation of tertiary structure information (35, 36, 40, 41) and identification of the cocaine binding site in DAT, as well as the allosteric binding site in SERT (18). Here, the zinc site results not only show that the inserted His-85 and His-476 are in close proximity, but they also support the suggestion that a dynamic interplay between the residues is required for DA transport, analogous with what can deduced from the crystal structures of LeuT and dDAT (1, 2, 4).

The binding of Zn2+ to DAT R85H/H193K/D476H causes an increase in Bmax for [3H]CFT, but interestingly it apparently does not increase its affinity. This contrasts with the classical pharmacological concept that, at saturating conditions, all possible binding sites should be occupied which should result in similar Bmax but with different affinities for CFT in the two conditions. A similar effect of Zn2+ on [3H]CFT binding was observed in the DAT WT with Zn2+ binding to the endogenous site (35, 36). One possible explanation is that CFT alone is unable to change the conformational equilibrium of DAT toward the conformation prone to bind CFT, it is only the conformational fluctuation of the protein per se that determines whether a CFT binding site is formed. Thus, irrespective of the added CFT concentration, the DAT fraction prone to bind CFT would be the same. In contrast, Zn2+ is able to change the conformational equilibrium of DAT shifting it toward the CFT prone conformation by the coordination of R85H and D476H (or by binding to the endogenous Zn2+ binding site). Accordingly, the CFT affinity would remain the same, and the Bmax will increase. Further experiments will have to elucidate the nature of Zn2+ binding to DAT. Taken together, these Zn2+ data substantiate the close proximity between Arg-85 and Asp-476 and support the role of dynamic TM1/TM10 interactions for stabilizing inhibitor binding and promoting transport.

In the present study, we show that the formation of the thin gate facilitates the binding of the tested ligands to DAT (CFT) and SERT (S-CIT). This is in agreement with our previous published molecular docking models of the same setup, DAT:CFT and SERT:S-CIT, based on the structure of LeuT (18, 19). The interaction was also observed by other groups in molecular docking models of SERT with bound imipramine (20) or (S)-citalopram (42). Thus, the data presented here support previously published docking models, suggesting that the binding of inhibitors induces the outward occluded conformation. This is in contrast to the published crystal structure of the dDAT with nortriptyline bound (2). Here the Arg-Asp interaction is broken, suggesting that nortriptyline binds to outward open conformation. Interestingly, the same outward open conformation was shown to bind both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine, and the stimulant mazindol to a LeuT:biogenic amine transporter hybrid (LeuBAT) (43). Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the binding conformations induced by the different inhibitors in the mammalian monoamine transporters.

The MTSET experiments support the hypothesis that mutation of the Arg-85/Asp-476 interaction shifts the conformational equilibrium toward a higher fraction of transporters residing in the outward open conformation. The probing for changes in conformational stages of the outer gate by investigating the MTSET reactivity toward an inserted cysteine into position 159 has become a well established method used in both DAT, the norepinephrine transporter, and SERT (10, 14, 38). Accordingly, we show here that even relatively conserved mutations (R85H or D476N) change the susceptibility of Cys-159 for reacting with MTSET, suggesting an increased accessibility of the cysteine residue toward the extracellular aqueous environment (Fig. 5).

Finally, we show that the shift of the charges in the corresponding residues in SERT results in a similar rescue pattern as we observed in DAT. As opposed to DAT, it is the R104E that possesses residual binding capacity in SERT. The Asp-476 in DAT is a glutamate in SERT, and mutation to arginine completely abolishes [3H]S-CIT binding (Fig. 6). Analogous to the charge reversal in DAT, the loss of binding in E493R is partly rescued by the R104E mutation. Despite the difference in binding pattern of the single mutants, the data do suggest that the two residues also interact in SERT.

In all, we here provide evidence that the DAT residues Arg-85 and Asp-476, shown to form the thin gate in LeuT, also interact in DAT. The interaction between the two positions promotes the binding of [3H]CFT but, more importantly, the data also show that constraining the residues with Zn2+ inhibits the transport of DA, suggesting that the interaction is dynamic and must be continuously broken and formed during substrate translocation. Moreover, the presence of the charged pair throughout NSS family proteins and the presumed conserved functional role from LeuT to DAT presented here strongly supports an evolutionary conserved functional role for the two residues among all NSS proteins.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Lei Shi and Thijs Beuming (Medical School of Cornell University, New York) for providing the molecular docking model of DAT:DA complex and Lone Rosenquist, Pia Elsman, and Bente Bennicke for excellent technical assistance. We also thank Prof. Ulrik Gether for critical reading and helpful comments to the manuscript.

*

This work was supported in part by funds from the Danish Independent Research Council, Sapere Aude (to C. J. L.), the Lundbeck Foundation (to C. J. L.), and the UNIK Center for Synthetic Biology (to C. J. L.).

2
The abbreviations used are:
NSS
neurotransmitter:sodium symporter
DAT
dopamine transporter
dDAT
Drosophila DAT
synDAT
synthetic human DAT
SERT
serotonin transporter
MTSET
[2-(trimethyl-ammonium)ethyl]-methanethiosulfonate
TM
transmembrane segment
CFT
2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane
S-CIT
(S)-citalopram
GAT-1
GABA transporter-1
[3H]DA
3,4-[Ring-2,5,6-3H]-dihydroxyphenylethylamine
UB
uptake buffer.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yamashita A., Singh S. K., Kawate T., Jin Y., Gouaux E. (2005) Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature 437, 215–223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Penmatsa A., Wang K. H., Gouaux E. (2013) X-ray structure of dopamine transporter elucidates antidepressant mechanism. Nature 503, 85–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Singh S. K., Piscitelli C. L., Yamashita A., Gouaux E. (2008) A competitive inhibitor traps LeuT in an open-to-out conformation. Science 322, 1655–1661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Krishnamurthy H., Gouaux E. (2012) X-ray structures of LeuT in substrate-free outward-open and apo inward-open states. Nature 481, 469–474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kazmier K., Sharma S., Quick M., Islam S. M., Roux B., Weinstein H., Javitch J. A., McHaourab H. S. (2014) Conformational dynamics of ligand-dependent alternating access in LeuT. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 472–479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhao Y., Terry D. S., Shi L., Quick M., Weinstein H., Blanchard S. C., Javitch J. A. (2011) Substrate-modulated gating dynamics in a Na+-coupled neurotransmitter transporter homologue. Nature 474, 109–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Claxton D. P., Quick M., Shi L., de Carvalho F. D., Weinstein H., Javitch J. A., McHaourab H. S. (2010) Ion/substrate-dependent conformational dynamics of a bacterial homolog of neurotransmitter:sodium symporters. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 822–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhao Y., Terry D., Shi L., Weinstein H., Blanchard S. C., Javitch J. A. (2010) Single-molecule dynamics of gating in a neurotransmitter transporter homologue. Nature 465, 188–193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kniazeff J., Loland C. J., Goldberg N., Quick M., Das S., Sitte H. H., Javitch J. A., Gether U. (2005) Intramolecular cross-linking in a bacterial homolog of mammalian SLC6 neurotransmitter transporters suggests an evolutionary conserved role of transmembrane segments 7 and 8. Neuropharmacology 49, 715–723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Loland C. J., Grånäs C., Javitch J. A., Gether U. (2004) Identification of intracellular residues in the dopamine transporter critical for regulation of transporter conformation and cocaine binding. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3228–3238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Loland C. J., Norregaard L., Litman T., Gether U. (2002) Generation of an activating Zn2+ switch in the dopamine transporter: mutation of an intracellular tyrosine constitutively alters the conformational equilibrium of the transport cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 1683–1688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Forrest L. R., Zhang Y. W., Jacobs M. T., Gesmonde J., Xie L., Honig B. H., Rudnick G. (2008) Mechanism for alternating access in neurotransmitter transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 10338–10343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhang Y. W., Rudnick G. (2006) The cytoplasmic substrate permeation pathway of serotonin transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 36213–36220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chen J. G., Rudnick G. (2000) Permeation and gating residues in serotonin transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1044–1049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chen N., Rickey J., Berfield J. L., Reith M. E. (2004) Aspartate 345 of the dopamine transporter is critical for conformational changes in substrate translocation and cocaine binding. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 5508–5519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chen N., Zhen J., Reith M. E. (2004) Mutation of Trp84 and Asp313 of the dopamine transporter reveals similar mode of binding interaction for GBR12909 and benztropine as opposed to cocaine. J. Neurochem. 89, 853–864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Beuming T., Shi L., Javitch J. A., Weinstein H. (2006) A comprehensive structure-based alignment of prokaryotic and eukaryotic neurotransmitter/Na+ symporters (NSS) aids in the use of the LeuT structure to probe NSS structure and function. Mol. Pharmacol. 70, 1630–1642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Plenge P., Shi L., Beuming T., Te J., Newman A. H., Weinstein H., Gether U., Loland C. J. (2012) Steric hindrance mutagenesis in the conserved extracellular vestibule impedes allosteric binding of antidepressants to the serotonin transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 39316–39326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Beuming T., Kniazeff J., Bergmann M. L., Shi L., Gracia L., Raniszewska K., Newman A. H., Javitch J. A., Weinstein H., Gether U., Loland C. J. (2008) The binding sites for cocaine and dopamine in the dopamine transporter overlap. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 780–789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sinning S., Musgaard M., Jensen M., Severinsen K., Celik L., Koldsø H., Meyer T., Bols M., Jensen H. H., Schiøtt B., Wiborg O. (2010) Binding and orientation of tricyclic antidepressants within the central substrate site of the human serotonin transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 8363–8374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ben-Yona A., Kanner B. I. (2012) An acidic amino acid transmembrane helix 10 residue conserved in the neurotransmitter:sodium:symporters is essential for the formation of the extracellular gate of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter GAT-1. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 7159–7168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ben-Yona A., Kanner B. I. (2013) Functional defects in the external and internal thin gates of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter GAT-1 can compensate each other. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 4549–4556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Saunders C., Ferrer J. V., Shi L., Chen J., Merrill G., Lamb M. E., Leeb-Lundberg L. M., Carvelli L., Javitch J. A., Galli A. (2000) Amphetamine-induced loss of human dopamine transporter activity: an internalization-dependent and cocaine-sensitive mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 6850–6855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jespersen T., Grunnet M., Angelo K., Klaerke D. A., Olesen S. P. (2002) Dual-function vector for protein expression in both mammalian cells and Xenopus laevis oocytes. BioTechniques 32, 536–538, 540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Loland C. J., Mereu M., Okunola O. M., Cao J., Prisinzano T. E., Mazier S., Kopajtic T., Shi L., Katz J. L., Tanda G., Newman A. H. (2012) R-modafinil (armodafinil): a unique dopamine uptake inhibitor and potential medication for psychostimulant abuse. Biol. Psychiatry. 72, 405–413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Borre L., Andreassen T. F., Shi L., Weinstein H., Gether U. (2014) The second sodium site in the dopamine transporter controls cation permeation and is regulated by chloride. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 25764–25773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sorkina T., Miranda M., Dionne K. R., Hoover B. R., Zahniser N. R., Sorkin A. (2006) RNA interference screen reveals an essential role of Nedd4–2 in dopamine transporter ubiquitination and endocytosis. J. Neurosci. 26, 8195–8205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kniazeff J., Shi L., Loland C. J., Javitch J. A., Weinstein H., Gether U. (2008) An intracellular interaction network regulates conformational transitions in the dopamine transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17691–17701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sonders M. S., Zhu S. J., Zahniser N. R., Kavanaugh M. P., Amara S. G. (1997) Multiple ionic conductances of the human dopamine transporter: the actions of dopamine and psychostimulants. J. Neurosci. 17, 960–974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kanner B. I. (2003) Transmembrane domain I of the γ-aminobutyric acid transporter GAT-1 plays a crucial role in the transition between cation leak and transport modes. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 3705–3712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. MacAulay N., Zeuthen T., Gether U. (2002) Conformational basis for the Li+-induced leak current in the rat γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter-1. J. Physiol. 544, 447–458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schwabe J. W., Klug A. (1994) Zinc mining for protein domains. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 345–349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Alberts I. L., Nadassy K., Wodak S. J. (1998) Analysis of zinc binding sites in protein crystal structures. Protein Sci 7, 1700–1716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Karlin S., Zhu Z. Y. (1997) Classification of mononuclear zinc metal sites in protein structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 14231–14236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Loland C. J., Norregaard L., Gether U. (1999) Defining proximity relationships in the tertiary structure of the dopamine transporter. Identification of a conserved glutamic acid as a third coordinate in the endogenous Zn2+-binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36928–36934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Norregaard L., Frederiksen D., Nielsen E. O., Gether U. (1998) Delineation of an endogenous zinc-binding site in the human dopamine transporter. EMBO J. 17, 4266–4273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Stockner T., Montgomery T. R., Kudlacek O., Weissensteiner R., Ecker G. F., Freissmuth M., Sitte H. H. (2013) Mutational analysis of the high-affinity zinc binding site validates a refined human dopamine transporter homology model. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 9, e1002909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Loland C. J., Desai R. I., Zou M. F., Cao J., Grundt P., Gerstbrein K., Sitte H. H., Newman A. H., Katz J. L., Gether U. (2008) Relationship between conformational changes in the dopamine transporter and cocaine-like subjective effects of uptake inhibitors. Mol. Pharmacol. 73, 813–823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schicker K., Uzelac Z., Gesmonde J., Bulling S., Stockner T., Freissmuth M., Boehm S., Rudnick G., Sitte H. H., Sandtner W. (2012) Unifying concept of serotonin transporter-associated currents. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 438–445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. MacAulay N., Bendahan A., Loland C. J., Zeuthen T., Kanner B. I., Gether U. (2001) Engineered Zn2+ switches in the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter-1: differential effects on GABA uptake and currents. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 40476–40485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Norregaard L., Visiers I., Loland C. J., Ballesteros J., Weinstein H., Gether U. (2000) Structural probing of a microdomain in the dopamine transporter by engineering of artificial Zn2+ binding sites. Biochemistry 39, 15836–15846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Andersen J., Olsen L., Hansen K. B., Taboureau O., Jørgensen F. S., Jørgensen A. M., Bang-Andersen B., Egebjerg J., Strømgaard K., Kristensen A. S. (2010) Mutational mapping and modeling of the binding site for (S)-citalopram in the human serotonin transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 2051–2063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wang H., Goehring A., Wang K. H., Penmatsa A., Ressler R., Gouaux E. (2013) Structural basis for action by diverse antidepressants on biogenic amine transporters. Nature 503, 141–145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES