Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1972 Feb;69(2):323–325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.2.323

How Genetic Background Masks Single-Gene Heterosis in Drosophila

Christopher Wills 1, Lois Nichols 1
PMCID: PMC426449  PMID: 4501117

Abstract

Conditional heterosis associated with two isoallelic forms of octanol dehydrogenase in Drosophila pseudoobscura has been detected in flies that have been (a) inbred for several generations to make the background genotype as homozygous as practicable, and (b) grown on a medium containing a small amount of octanol. The heterosis was first found in inbred males. The possibility that the effect in females was masked by X-linked polymorphic genes affecting the same fitness components as the locus for octanol dehydrogenase was shown to be correct when, on further inbreeding, heterosis was found in the females of one of the lines. The implications of this and other findings for the current understanding of the genetic structure of natural populations is discussed.

Keywords: polymorphism, selection, isoenzymes, inbreeding, fly

Full text

PDF
323

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLISON A. C. POLYMORPHISM AND NATURAL SELECTION IN HUMAN POPULATIONS. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1964;29:137–149. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1964.029.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hubby J L. Protein Differences in Drosophila. I. Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1963 Jun;48(6):871–879. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.6.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hubby J. L., Lewontin R. C. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. I. The number of alleles at different loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):577–594. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marshall D. R., Allard R. W. Maintenance of Isozyme Polymorphisms in Natural Populations of AVENA BARBATA. Genetics. 1970 Oct;66(2):393–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milkman R. D. Heterosis as a major cause of heterozygosity in nature. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):493–495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Prakash S., Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):841–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wills C., Crenshaw J., Vitale J. A computer model allowing maintenance of large amounts of genetic variability in mendelian populations. I. Assumptions and results for large populations. Genetics. 1970 Jan;64(1):107–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/64.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wills C., Nichols L. Single-gene heterosis in Drosophila revealed by inbreeding. Nature. 1971 Sep 10;233(5315):123–125. doi: 10.1038/233123a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES