N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-18F-5-fluoropicolinamide PET/CT is a feasible technique for visualizing and detecting the long-term activity of implanted retinal pigment epithelium cells for the treatment of Parkinson disease in vivo.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the performance of N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-18F-5-fluoropicolinamide (18F-P3BZA) for visualizing porcine retinal pigment epithelium (pRPE) cells transplanted in the striatum for the treatment of Parkinson disease and to monitor the long-term activity of implanted pRPE cells by means of 18F-P3BZA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Animal work was conducted in accordance with the administrative panel on laboratory animal care. In vitro cell uptake of 18F-P3BZA was determined with incubation of melanotic pRPE or amelanotic ARPE-19 cells with 18F-P3BZA. To visualize the implanted pRPE cells in vivo, normal rats (four per group) were injected with pRPE or ARPE-19 cells attached to gelatin microcarriers in the left striatum and with control gelatin microcarriers in the right striatum and followed up with small animal PET/CT. Longitudinal PET/CT scans were acquired in 12 rats up to 16 days after surgery. Postmortem analysis, which included autoradiography and hematoxylin-eosin, Fontana-Masson, and immunofluorescence staining, was performed. Data were compared with the Student t test, analysis of variance, and regression analysis.
Results
18F-P3BZA accumulated in pRPE cells effectively (3.48% of the injected dose [ID] per gram of brain tissue ± 0.58 at 1 hour after injection of the probe at 2 days after surgery in vivo) but not in control ARPE-19 cells (P < .05). Longitudinal PET/CT scans revealed that the activity of implanted pRPE cells decreased over time, as evidenced by a reduction in 18F-P3BZA uptake (3.39% ID/g ± 0.18, 2.49% ID/g ± 0.41, and 1.20% ID/g ± 0.13 at days 2, 9, and 16, respectively; P < .05). Postmortem analysis helped confirm the results of in vivo imaging.
Conclusion
18F-P3BZA PET/CT is a feasible technique for visualizing and detecting the activity of implanted RPE cells in vivo.
© RSNA, 2014
Introduction
Parkinson disease is a neurodegenerative disorder with a selective vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, which shows irreversible loss of dopamine in the striatum as a consequence. Parkinson disease affects approximately 1%–2% of the population older than 60 years (1). Striatal transplantation of cells that produce dopamine or L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) has been actively investigated for Parkinson disease treatment in preclinical and clinical trials. This treatment has the potential advantage of providing a long-term, continuous dopaminergic source and avoiding motor complications because of the fluctuations and chronic intermittent dopaminergic stimulation associated with oral L-DOPA administration (2–5).
Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells accumulate L-DOPA as a precursor for the formation of their characteristic melanin pigment (6). Apart from L-DOPA production, human RPE (hRPE) cells can also produce a small amount of dopamine directly and possess other molecular machinery involved in dopamine production and regulation (7–10). Therefore, hRPE cells attached to gelatin microcarriers have been explored as a promising source of donor cells for neural transplantation in the treatment of Parkinson disease by providing “L-DOPA pumps” to maintain stable L-DOPA levels (11). Both preclinical studies (in rodents and nonhuman primates) (12,13) and clinical trials (14,15) indicated that implantation of hRPE cells attached to gelatin microcarriers into the striatum could ameliorate the behavioral deficits of the recipients. However, in another large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, clinical benefits of this therapy were not observed (16). These discrepant results raise a number of critical issues that must be addressed before further clinical trials are performed. The fact that “no assay is available to detect the activity of hRPE cells following their implantation into the host brain in vivo” (17) is a major limitation of the studies to date (13,18).
Considering the melanogenesis mechanism of RPE cells for neural transplantation (19,20), we hypothesized that the melanin-targeted small molecule probe N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-18F-5-fluoropicolinamide (18F-P3BZA) could serve as a positron emission tomography (PET) probe for monitoring RPE cells transplanted into the striatum. The aims of this study were to (a) evaluate the performance of 18F-P3BZA for visualizing the activity of RPE cells in vivo by monitoring the activity of the melanin and (b) monitor the long-term graft activity of implanted RPE cells following their implantation into the host striatum in vivo by means of 18F-P3BZA PET/computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods
Z.C. and L.B. have a patent pending for 18F-P3BZA. All animal work was conducted in accordance with the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care at Stanford University. A schematic drawing of 18F-P3BZA for imaging of RPE cells in rat brains is shown in Figure 1. Details of methods are in Appendix E1 (online). This includes radiosynthesis of 18F-P3BZA (prepared according to a previously published procedure [21,22]). Melanotic pRPE (23) and amelanotic ARPE-19 cells (24) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, for evaluating 18F-P3BZA in vitro and in vivo. pRPE cells were isolated according to a previously published procedure (25), which is also detailed in Appendix E1 (online).
In Vitro Assays
pRPE (generation 3) or control ARPE-19 cells (5 × 105) were plated in a 12-well plate pretreated with l-tyrosine (2 mmol/L) for 24 hours or not treated at all, followed by incubation with 74 kBq (2 μCi) per well of 18F-P3BZA at 37°C for 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes. Here, l-tyrosine is one of the key substrates of the melanogenic pathway. It is typically used to boost melanin content in cells and verify the specificity of melanin-targeted probes (26,27). The cells were washed three times with chilled phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with 500 μL of 0.1 mol/L NaOH. The cell lysates were then collected and the radioactivity of the lysates was measured with a gamma counter (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, Mass). The cell uptake was expressed as the percentage of total applied radioactivity. All experiments were performed with triplicate samples. Similarly, uptake of 18F-P3BZA at 30-minute incubation was determined in pRPE cells at different passages (passage numbers 3, 5, and 8, which are represented as pRPE-P3, pRPE-P5, and pRPE-P8, respectively) and control ARPE-19 cells, with or without pretreatment with l-tyrosine, to further evaluate the probe uptake characteristics for the pRPE cells during the passaging process.
In vitro measurement of melanin content was also performed for pRPE and ARPE-19 cells in parallel with the cell uptake assays according to methods reported previously (28).
Cell Implantation
RPE cells (pRPE and control ARPE-19 cells) were passively adsorbed or attached to gelatin microcarriers (Cytodex 1, 131–220-μm diameter; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) according to typical methods (11). We illustrated the content of melanin in RPE cells by the unit of absorbance at 405 nm per milligram of protein, which is represented as A405 per milligram of protein.
Twenty-four female Wistar rats were used in this study. Melanotic pRPE or amelanotic ARPE-19 cells (approximately 12 000–15 000 cells in 10 μL) were injected into striatum. The implantation procedure was performed following the surgical procedures described in a previous report (29).
PET/CT
Small-animal PET/CT was performed with a PET/CT system (Inveon; Siemens Healthcare Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, Tenn). For each rat, 18F-P3BZA (7.4 MBq, 200 μCi) was administered through the tail vein.
To assess the in vivo kinetics of 18F-P3BZA in normal rat brain, a 70-minute dynamic PET scan was obtained in four normal rats. The results were divided by the injected dose (ID) to obtain an image region of interest–derived percentage of the ID per gram of tissue, and the time-activity curve was then calculated.
To evaluate the performance of 18F-P3BZA for imaging implanted pRPE cells in vivo, static PET/CT was performed in normal rats by implanting pRPE cells or ARPE-19 cells attached to gelatin microcarriers (n = 4 for both) in the left striatum. Gelatin microcarriers alone were implanted in the right striatum as controls. PET/CT was performed 1 hour after tail vein injection of 18F-P3BZA.
To evaluate the potential of 18F-P3BZA for monitoring the survival and function of implanted RPE cells, longitudinal PET/CT scans were obtained 2, 9, and 16 days after cell implantation (n = 12). All live rats were imaged at each time point, and four rats were sacrificed after each PET/CT procedure. Thus, 12 rats were imaged on day 2, eight were imaged on day 9, and four were imaged on day 16. PET/CT image analysis was performed by radiologists B.S. and L.B. (with 28 and 13 years of experience, respectively).
Postmortem Analysis
Rats were sacrificed immediately after PET/CT, and rat brain slices were prepared for postmortem analysis. Because the spatial resolution and partial volume effects of PET may not allow for accurate determination of PET probe localization in specific brain regions, ex vivo autoradiography was performed. Immediately after static PET/CT, frozen axial brain slices (12 μm thick) were prepared for autoradiography. Quantitation of radioactivity in autoradiography images was performed by using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md). The brain slices adjacent to those for autoradiography study were stained with hematoxylin-eosin to identify the implantation sites and anatomy of brain sections.
To verify the presence of melanin, slices from the block containing a representative RPE cell profile on initial review were stained with Fontana-Masson stain after obtaining longitudinal PET/CT scans according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. To identify the implanted pRPE cells, tissue slices adjacent to those for Fontana-Masson staining underwent immunohistochemistry staining with use of RPE65 (Chemicon, Temecula, Calif), following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Postmortem analysis was performed by a neurologist (H.Z., with 19 years of experience).
Statistical Methods
Means were compared by using the Student t test, analysis of variance, and regression analysis. P < .05 was indicative of a significant difference. The Pearson correlation coefficients (R2) were calculated to assess the relationship between 18F-P3BZA cell uptake and melanin content in pRPE cells. Data were analyzed by using software (version 8.02; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
Synthesis of 18F-P3BZA
High-performance liquid chromatography purification of 18F-P3BZA yielded 9.5% ± 1.9 radiochemical yields with 10.4-minute retention time, affording a product with more than 95% radiochemical purity and specific activity of 100–150 GBq/μmol.
In Vitro Assays
Cell uptake results at multiple time points showed that 18F-P3BZA accumulated effectively in pRPE cells but not in control ARPE-19 cells (Fig 2, A). The uptake of 18F-P3BZA in pRPE cells maximized at a mean ± standard deviation of 10.72% ± 0.38 of applied activity within 30 minutes and remained at 9.09% ± 0.31 and 8.61% ± 0.47 at 60 and 120 minutes, respectively. At each time point, uptake in pRPE cells was significantly higher than that in the control ARPE-19 cells, which remained low (P = .03). For pRPE cells, there was a pronounced increase in uptake for 18F-P3BZA after treatment with tyrosine, which was approximately three- to fourfold higher than that in nontreatment groups. For the control ARPE-19 cells, however, there was no difference before and after tyrosine treatment (P = .25).
The cell uptake of 18F-P3BZA in pRPE cells at different passages showed that pRPE-P3 had the greatest uptake, followed by pRPE-P5 and then pRPE-P8 (the decreasing rate is −1.45% of applied activity per passage, P < .0001), with a decreasing response to tyrosine treatment. After tyrosine treatment, uptake of 18F-P3BZA in pRPE-P3, pRPE-P5, and pRPE-P8 was increased by 48.8%, 37.8%, and 31.9%, respectively (Fig 2, B). There was no difference for the probe uptake between l-tyrosine–treated ARPE-19 cells and untreated ARPE-19 cells (P = .13).
The amount of 18F-P3BZA uptake (mean, 10.71% ± 0.38, 6.25% ± 0.59, 3.29% ± 0.15, and 1.31% ± 0.15 of applied activity) was highly correlated with the melanin content (14.34 A405 per milligram of protein ± 0.48, 7.71 A405 per milligram of protein ± 0.50, 6.04 A405 per milligram of protein ± 0.38, and 5.56 A405 per milligram of protein ± 0.21) in pRPE cells and control ARPE-19 cells (Fig 2, C, R2 = 0.91). Melanogenesis was reduced with an increasing number of pRPE cell passages (rate of decrease, −1.57 A405 per milligram of protein per passage; P = .0011) (Fig 2, D).
Dynamic PET Scans in Normal Rat Brain
Dynamic PET images provided visual evidence that 18F-P3BZA could rapidly cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the brain. Moreover, most of the probe was cleared at 28 minutes after injection (Fig 3, A). Similarly, the time-activity curve of brain from dynamic PET scans demonstrated that 18F-P3BZA rapidly accumulated in the rat brain (Fig 3, B), peaked at 7.61% ID/g ± 0.30 within the first 2 minutes, and then gradually decreased over the remaining scanning time. The amount of 18F-P3BZA accumulated in brain decreased to 3.54% ID/g ± 0.21 at 28 minutes after injection and further decreased to 1.04% ID/g ± 0.37 at 60 minutes after injection (rate of decrease, −0.16% ID/g/min; P < .0001).
In Vivo Small-Animal Static PET/CT, ex Vivo Autoradiography, and Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining
On PET/CT scans, the injected microcarrier–bound pRPE cells were clearly visualized with high contrast, whereas both control gelatin microcarrier–bound ARPE-19 cells and the contralateral control gelatin microcarriers could not be delineated (Fig 4, A). Results of quantification analysis are summarized in Figure 4, B. The uptake of 18F-P3BZA in gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cells (mean, 3.48% ID/g ± 0.58) was higher than that in control microcarrier–bound ARPE-19 cells or gelatin microcarriers alone (1.23% ID/g ± 0.19 and 1.19% ID/g ± 0.23, respectively; P = .003). The gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cell–to–control gelatin microcarriers uptake ratio was significantly higher than the gelatin microcarrier–bound ARPE-19 cell–to–gelatin microcarriers uptake ratio (mean, 3.05 ± 0.57 vs 1.21 ± 0.36, respectively; P = .04) (Fig 4, C).
The implantation sites and the anatomy of brain sections were easily recognized (Fig 4, D). All of the cells and gelatin microcarriers injected were within the striatum and formed clumps.
Autoradiography images also revealed prominent 18F-P3BZA accumulation in the area of the gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cell transplant site. A “hot spot” was evident in the region that exhibited both microcarrier aggregation and structural changes due to surgery in the parallel macroscopic hematoxylin-eosin–stained section. No visible hot spot could be identified in the injection sites for control gelatin microcarrier–bound RPE-19 cells or contralateral gelatin microcarriers alone. Results of quantitative analysis showed that the signal of the transplant site for the gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cells was significantly higher than that of injection sites for gelatin microcarrier–bound ARPE-19 cells or contralateral gelatin microcarriers alone (P < .0001) (Fig 4, E).
Longitudinal PET/CT Scans
PET/CT demonstrated that 18F-P3BZA accumulation in gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cells decreased gradually with time after implantation (Fig 5). The gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cells were visible as a strong hot spot 2 days after implantation, whereas the imaging signal of gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cells was much weaker and was visible as a moderate hot spot 9 days after implantation. At 16 days, hot spots could not be clearly recognized. Uptake of 18F-P3BZA peaked at 3.39% ID/g ± 0.18 at 2 days after implantation, then decreased to 2.49% ID/g ± 0.41 at 9 days and dropped to a baseline level (1.20% ID/g ± 0.13) at 16 days (rate of decrease, −0.16% ID/g per day; P < .0001).
Fontana-Masson Staining and Immunohistochemistry Staining
RPE65-positive cells were found to surround the gelatin microcarriers closely at days 2, 9, and 16 (Fig 6). Melanin was identified as black spots by means of Fontana-Masson staining. At day 2, we observed a lot of granular melanin spots both inside and outside of pRPE cells. A moderate amount of spots were seen at day 9, and a very small number of spots were seen at day 16.
Discussion
18F-P3BZA can be easily prepared by means of one-step radiosynthesis. It displays high melanin targeting specificity and shows excellent performance for in vivo imaging of melanotic melanoma (21,22). In our study, as expected, 18F-P3BZA specifically and effectively localizes in pRPE cells in a melanin-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, correlation analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between the uptake of 18F-P3BZA and the melanin content in pRPE cells. Our in vivo PET imaging study of rats implanted with cells showed that 18F-P3BZA could help clearly delineate the implanted pRPE cells from the background brain signal, but not ARPE19-gelatin microcarriers or gelatin microcarriers, at 2 days after implantation. This finding was further confirmed with autoradiography and hematoxylin-eosin staining, which showed subjective similar locations of the18F-P3BZA in the expected region of RPE cells transplanted into the striatum.
Our study also revealed that PET with 18F-P3BZA provides excellent imaging contrast. High gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cell–to–contralateral gelatin microcarrier or adjacent normal striatum uptake ratios can be obtained (3.05 ± 0.57 and 3.19 ± 0.53, respectively). These high ratios are mainly attributed to the high melanin targeting specificity of 18F-P3BZA as well as the lack of endogenous melanin in striatum area (30). Considering that the RPE cells are only implanted into the striatum of patients, a high RPE cell uptake of 18F-P3BZA to striatum ratio is expected in humans. This is a major advantage of 18F-P3BZA over other PET probes such as the previously reported carbon 11 (1C)–raclopride or 18F-fluoro-l-DOPA (31–33). For these two probes, the endogenous dopamine or enzymatic activities could compromise their performance in the imaging of implanted RPE cells, and the imaging quality of these two probes is quite poor. For example, before and after implantation of the RPE cells, the implantation site (striatum)–to-cortex uptake ratios were only 1.35 ± 0.10 and 1.48 ± 0.07 for 18F-fluoro-l-DOPA and 2.41 ± 0.74 and 2.44 ± 0.67, respectively, for 11C-raclopride (32). More important, 11C-raclopride and 18F-fluoro-l-DOPA PET display the overall information from endogenous dopamine release or enzymatic activities and the changes caused by implanted RPE cells. Thus, it is difficult to use them for evaluating the treatment efficacy of RPE cells.
In our study, longitudinal PET/CT scans showed a significant reduction in uptake of 18F-P3BZA in the gelatin microcarrier–bound pRPE cells over time, suggesting the reduction of the total melanogenesis in implanted cells. Results of immunohistochemistry staining demonstrated that an appreciable number of implanted pRPE cells survived over the 16-day experimental period, with the number of cells only slightly reduced. This result is consistent with those from other reports (11,12,34). However, results of Fontana-Masson staining revealed that the amount of melanin decreases sharply over time. Therefore, it is likely that the diminished uptake of 18F-P3BZA is caused mainly by the reduced activity of melanin synthesis in pRPE cells as cells divide. Our in vitro results provide evidence to support this explanation. Indeed, as pRPE cell passages advance, melanin content decreases and the uptake of 18F-P3BZA decreases accordingly.
Because the activity of the melanin synthesis pathway provides a rationale for the application of hRPE cells in Parkinson disease therapy, the source of hRPE donor cells is crucial for successful therapy. However, melanogenesis in adult RPE cells remains controversial. Some scientists believe that melanin synthesis occurs in hRPE cells throughout a person’s life, albeit at a slow rate, whereas others consider that it ceases at birth (8,35). Age-related change of melanin expression in hRPE cells has thus been studied (36). In our study, we adopted adult pRPE cells as the source of donor cells, and this may explain part of the diminished activity of 18F-P3BZA over time. Similarly, most previous reports of hRPE cell therapy for Parkinson disease did not define standard criteria for the selection of donor cells. Therefore, the use of cells obtained from donors of different ages may be partly responsible for the variation and inconsistencies in the treatment outcomes from different clinical trials.
Some limitations in our study should be noted. 18F-P3BZA PET cannot help differentiate the melanin loss caused by either poor cell survival or low melaninogenesis activity. However, this limitation is not likely to be an issue because both poor cell survival and low melaninogenesis activity can reduce treatment efficacy. A second limitation is that our study is based on a rat model with porcine RPE cells as the source of donor cells. It is necessary to further study the efficacy of 18F-P3BZA PET in humans or nonhuman primates by using allograft hRPE cells.
Practical applications: 18F-P3BZA PET/CT is a feasible technique for visualizing and detecting the long-term activity of implanted RPE cells for the treatment of Parkinson disease in vivo. 18F-P3BZA PET/CT provides opportunities to visualize, characterize, and detect the long-term activity of implanted RPE cells. Practical applications lie in the possibility of improving the therapeutic efficacy of hRPE cells for Parkinson disease treatment in the clinic.
Advances in Knowledge
■ The melanin-targeted PET probe N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-18F-5-fluoropicolinamide (18F-P3BZA) shows high accumulation in porcine retinal pigment epithelium (pRPE) cells (10.72% ± 0.38 of applied activity within 30 minutes after co-incubation) and excellent imaging contrast (as evidenced by a much higher microcarrier-bound pRPE cells–to–control gelatin microcarriers uptake ratio than microcarrier-bound ARPE-19-cell–to–gelatin microcarriers uptake ratio [3.05 ± 0.57 vs 1.21 ± 0.36, respectively; P = .04]).
■ 18F-P3BZA identifies and binds to transplanted pRPE cells specifically in a melanin-dependent manner, as evidenced by the high correlation (R2 = 0.91) between the 18F-P3BZA uptake and the melanin content in pRPE cells at different passages and the consistency between the longitudinal PET imaging results and the corresponding postmortem analysis.
■ In vivo18F-P3BZA PET reveals that the activity of implanted pRPE cells decreases over time after their implantation into the rat brain.
■ 18F-P3BZA shows favorable pharmacokinetics in normal rat brain (the uptakes of 18F-P3BZA in rat brain are 7.61% of the injected dose [ID] per gram of tissue ± 0.30, 3.54% ID/g ± 0.21, and 1.04% ID/g ± 0.37 at 2, 28, and 60 minutes after injection, respectively), which makes it suitable for targeted imaging of retinal pigment epithelium cells in brain.
Implication for Patient Care
■ The melanin-targeted PET probe 18F-P3BZA provides a promising technique for imaging the activity of retinal pigment epithelium cells implanted for the treatment of patients with Parkinson disease and is worthy of further evaluation in the clinic.
APPENDIX
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Lijun Xu, MD, from the Department of Anesthesia of Stanford University School of Medicine for technical support.
Received August 29, 2013; revision requested October 9; revision received December 18; accepted January 24, 2014; final version accepted February 7.
From the 2013 RSNA Annual Meeting.
Supported in part by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy (grant DE-SC0008397), In vivo Cellular Molecular Imaging Center (grant P50 CA114747), Projects of Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 31210103913), and China National Natural Science Funds for Young Scholar (grant 81201125).
Funding: This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant 5R01 CA119053).
See also Science to Practice in this issue.
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: L.B. Financial activities related to the present article: none to disclose. Financial activities not related to the present article: none to disclose. Other relationships: has a patent pending. R.L. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. H.L. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. W.F. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. X.X. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. H.Z. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. D.V. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. B.S. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Z.C. Financial activities related to the present article: none to disclose. Financial activities not related to the present article: none to disclose. Other relationships: has a patent pending.
Abbreviations:
- 18F-P3BZA
- N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-18F-5-fluoropicolinamide
- hRPE
- human RPE
- ID
- injected dose
- L-DOPA
- L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine
- pRPE
- porcine RPE
- RPE
- retinal pigment epithelium
References
- 1.de Lau LM, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2006;5(6):525–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Olanow CW. Levodopa/dopamine replacement strategies in Parkinson’s disease—future directions. Mov Disord 2008;23(Suppl 3):S613–S622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Poewe W, Mahlknecht P, Jankovic J. Emerging therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurol 2012;25(4):448–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Olanow CW, Obeso JA, Stocchi F. Continuous dopamine-receptor treatment of Parkinson’s disease: scientific rationale and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol 2006;5(8):677–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hayes MW, Fung VS, Kimber TE, O’Sullivan JD. Current concepts in the management of Parkinson disease. Med J Aust 2010;192(3):144–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roffler-Tarlov S, Liu JH, Naumova EN, Bernal-Ayala MM, Mason CA. L-Dopa and the albino riddle: content of L-Dopa in the developing retina of pigmented and albino mice. PLoS ONE 2013;8(3):e57184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tombran-Tink J, Shivaram SM, Chader GJ, Johnson LV, Bok D. Expression, secretion, and age-related downregulation of pigment epithelium–derived factor, a serpin with neurotrophic activity. J Neurosci 1995;15(7 Pt 1):4992–5003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schraermeyer U, Kopitz J, Peters S, et al. Tyrosinase biosynthesis in adult mammalian retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res 2006;83(2):315–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dorey CK, Torres X, Swart T. Evidence of melanogenesis in porcine retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro. Exp Eye Res 1990;50(1):1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kubrusly RC, Guimarães MZ, Vieira AP, et al. L-DOPA supply to the neuro retina activates dopaminergic communication at the early stages of embryonic development. J Neurochem 2003;86(1):45–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flores J, Cepeda IL, Cornfeldt ML, O’Kusky JR, Doudet DJ. Characterization and survival of long-term implants of human retinal pigment epithelial cells attached to gelatin microcarriers in a model of Parkinson disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007;66(7):585–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Subramanian T, Marchionini D, Potter EM, Cornfeldt ML. Striatal xenotransplantation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells attached to microcarriers in hemiparkinsonian rats ameliorates behavioral deficits without provoking a host immune response. Cell Transplant 2002;11(3):207–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Watts RL, Raiser CD, Stover NP, et al. Stereotaxic intrastriatal implantation of human retinal pigment epithelial (hRPE) cells attached to gelatin microcarriers: a potential new cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Suppl 2003 (65):215–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stover NP, Bakay RA, Subramanian T, et al. Intrastriatal implantation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells attached to microcarriers in advanced Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2005;62(12):1833–1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stover NP, Watts RL. Spheramine for treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics 2008;5(2):252–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gross RE, Watts RL, Hauser RA, et al. Intrastriatal transplantation of microcarrier-bound human retinal pigment epithelial cells versus sham surgery in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2011;10(6):509–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cenci MA, Widner H. Parkinson disease: poor results for retinal cell transplants in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2011;7(8):424–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Albanese A. Cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease: have the glory days gone? Lancet Neurol 2011;10(6):492–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McKay BS, Goodman B, Falk T, Sherman SJ. Retinal pigment epithelial cell transplantation could provide trophic support in Parkinson’s disease: results from an in vitro model system. Exp Neurol 2006;201(1):234–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zareba M, Raciti MW, Henry MM, Sarna T, Burke JM. Oxidative stress in ARPE-19 cultures: do melanosomes confer cytoprotection? Free Radic Biol Med 2006;40(1):87–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu H, Liu S, Miao Z, et al. Development of 18F-labeled picolinamide probes for PET imaging of malignant melanoma. J Med Chem 2013;56(3):895–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Qin C, Cheng K, Chen K, et al. Tyrosinase as a multifunctional reporter gene for photoacoustic/MRI/PET triple modality molecular imaging. Sci Rep 2013;3:1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang HL, Wu JJ, Ren HM, Wang J, Su YR, Jiang YP. Therapeutic effect of microencapsulated porcine retinal pigmented epithelial cells transplantation on rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull 2007;23(3):137–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dunn KC, Aotaki-Keen AE, Putkey FR, Hjelmeland LM. ARPE-19, a human retinal pigment epithelial cell line with differentiated properties. Exp Eye Res 1996;62(2):155–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Feng W, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, LaVail MM, Vollrath D. Mertk triggers uptake of photoreceptor outer segments during phagocytosis by cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2002;277(19):17016–17022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim HJ, Kim DY, Park JH, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a (68)Ga-labeled N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)benzamide derivative as potential PET probe for malignant melanoma. Bioorg Med Chem 2012;20(16):4915–4920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ren G, Miao Z, Liu H, et al. Melanin-targeted preclinical PET imaging of melanoma metastasis. J Nucl Med 2009;50(10):1692–1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ishikawa M, Kawase I, Ishii F. Glycine inhibits melanogenesis in vitro and causes hypopigmentation in vivo. Biol Pharm Bull 2007;30(11):2031–2036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cepeda IL, Flores J, Cornfeldt ML, O’Kusky JR, Doudet DJ. Human retinal pigment epithelial cell implants ameliorate motor deficits in two rat models of Parkinson disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007;66(7):576–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fedorow H, Tribl F, Halliday G, Gerlach M, Riederer P, Double KL. Neuromelanin in human dopamine neurons: comparison with peripheral melanins and relevance to Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol 2005;75(2):109–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang R, Zhang J, Guo Z, et al. In-vivo PET imaging of implanted human retinal pigment epithelium cells in a Parkinson’s disease rat model. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29(5):455–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Doudet DJ, Cornfeldt ML, Honey CR, Schweikert AW, Allen RC. PET imaging of implanted human retinal pigment epithelial cells in the MPTP-induced primate model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 2004;189(2):361–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yin F, Tian ZM, Liu S, et al. Transplantation of human retinal pigment epithelium cells in the treatment for Parkinson disease. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012;18(12):1012–1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Farag ES, Vinters HV, Bronstein J. Pathologic findings in retinal pigment epithelial cell implantation for Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009;73(14):1095–1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schraermeyer U. Does melanin turnover occur in the eyes of adult vertebrates? Pigment Cell Res 1993;6(4 Pt 1):193–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sarna T, Burke JM, Korytowski W, et al. Loss of melanin from human RPE with aging: possible role of melanin photooxidation. Exp Eye Res 2003;76(1):89–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.