There are errors in Table 1. Please see the correct Table 1 here.
Table 1. Mean accuracies and response times (ms), averaged inverse efficiency scores (IES), multisensory congruence enhancement (MCE) scores and d'-estimates with standard errors (SE) for the visual-tactile detection task (see Methods section for details).
| ACC (SE) | RT (SE) | IES (SE) | MCE | d’ (SE) | ||||||
| congruent | incongruent | congruent | incongruent | congruent | incongruent | congruent | incongruent | |||
| Visual | ||||||||||
| Focused | 0.91 (0.01) | 0.89 (0.01) | 722 (33) | 723 (31) | 800 (39) | 814 (40) | 1 | 2.8 (0.08) | 2.58 (0.11) | |
| Divided | 0.92 (0.01) | 0.86 (0.02) | 912 (39) | 1031 (48) | 993 (44) | 1230 (69) | 16 | 1.98 (0.09) | 1.58 (0.11) | |
| Tactile | ||||||||||
| Focused | 0.84 (0.01) | 0.74 (0.02) | 871 (34) | 956(42) | 1043 (44) | 1308 (57) | 19 | 1.64 (0.07) | 0.98 (0.07) | |
| Divided | 0.92 (0.01) | 0.6 (0.03) | 912 (39) | 1364 (70) | 993 (44) | 2492 (177) | 55 | 1.98 (0.09) | 0.62 (0.11) | |
| Matching | ||||||||||
| Match as target | 0.77 (0.02) | 0.57 (0.03) | 1406 (85) | 1516 (100) | 1861 (132) | 3496 (574) | 27 | 0.98 (0.15) | ||
| Non-match as target | 0.71 (0.02) | 0.64 (0.03) | 1552 (59) | 1591 (71) | 2304 (143) | 2864 (278) | 8 | 0.99 (0.16) | ||
Reference
- 1. Göschl F, Engel AK, Friese U (2014) Attention Modulates Visual-Tactile Interaction in Spatial Pattern Matching. PLoS ONE 9(9): e106896 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]