Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2014 Oct 31;68(12):1514–1522. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12493

Incidence of tardive dyskinesia: a comparison of long-acting injectable and oral paliperidone clinical trial databases

S Gopal 1, H Xu 1, C Bossie 2, J A Burón 3, D J Fu 2, A Savitz 1, I Nuamah 1, D Hough 1
PMCID: PMC4265240  PMID: 25358867

Abstract

Background

To assess the tardive dyskinesia (TD) rate in studies of once-monthly long-acting injectable (LAI) paliperidone palmitate (PP) and once-daily oral paliperidone extended release (Pali ER).

Methods

Completed schizophrenia and bipolar studies for PP and Pali ER (≥ 6 month duration with retrievable patient-level data) were included in this post hoc analysis. Schooler–Kane research criteria were applied using Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores to categorise probable (qualifying AIMS scores persisting for ≥ 3 months) and persistent TD (score persisting ≥ 6 months). Spontaneously reported TD adverse events (AEs) were also summarised. Impact of exposure duration on dyskinesia (defined as AIMS total score ≥ 3) was assessed by summarising the monthly dyskinesia rate.

Results

In the schizophrenia studies, TD rates for PP (four studies, N = 1689) vs. Pali ER (five studies, N = 2054), were: spontaneously reported AE, 0.18% (PP) vs. 0.10% (Pali ER); probable TD, 0.12% (PP) vs. 0.19% (Pali ER) and persistent TD, 0.12% (PP) vs. 0.05% (Pali ER). In the only bipolar study identified [Pali ER (N = 614)], TD rate was zero (spontaneously reported AE reporting, probable and persistent TD assessments). Dyskinesia rate was higher within the first month of treatment with both PP (13.1%) and Pali ER (11.7%) and steadily decreased over time (months 6–7: PP: 5.4%; Pali ER: 6.4%). Mean exposure: PP, 279.6 days; Pali ER, 187.2 days.

Conclusions

Risk of TD with paliperidone was low (< 0.2%), regardless of the formulation (oral or LAI), in this clinical trial dataset. Longer cumulative exposure does not appear to increase the risk of dyskinesias.


What's known

Paliperidone extended release (ER), an oral once-daily tablet, and paliperidone palmitate, a once monthly injectable, are both approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in many countries. Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is one of the potential side effects of antipsychotic medications, particularly associated with long-term treatment with dopamine D2 receptor blockade. Paliperidone is a potent inhibitor of the dopamine D2 receptor. Chronic treatment with antipsychotic medication may result in TD.

What's new

This post hoc analysis suggests that the risk of TD from paliperidone appears to be similar regardless of administration route or release profiles (monthly long-acting injectable versus daily oral dosing) in the treatment of schizophrenia. The risk for TD with paliperidone treatment was observed to be low and similar to data from published literature with other atypical antipsychotics. Longer cumulative exposure does not appear to increase the risk of dyskinesias.

Introduction

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a serious movement disorder that manifests in many different forms, but typically involves repetitive uncontrolled involuntary movements of the face, jaw and lips. In more severe forms it can impact the trunk or limbs or both 1,2. The occurrence of TD is associated with long-term treatment with several medication classes, including antimuscarinics, toxins, substances of abuse and antipsychotic medications 37. Antipsychotic-associated TD has been the focus of research for decades, with varying TD rates reported because of differences in TD definitions, populations, treatment conditions, etc. 8. Potential risk factors for TD include demographic characteristics (e.g. increasing age, female sex, race), medication regimen (e.g. specific drug, higher dose, longer duration of treatment) and medical conditions [e.g. acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), psychosis, mood disorders, diabetes mellitus and organic brain dysfunction or damage]. Multiple types of acute EPS, such as parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia, as well as dyskinesia, appear to increase the risk for TD 913. The potential of TD to be irreversible and severe can contribute to significant disability and social stigma for afflicted patients.

Atypical antipsychotics have generally shown a better safety profile compared with conventional antipsychotics, particularly in terms of a lower risk for TD 1418. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics provide more continuous, effective blood levels than daily oral antipsychotic medications thus, eliminating the need for daily treatment and overcoming a significant barrier to optimal medication management for many patients. However, some reports suggest that compared with oral antipsychotics, LAI may increase acute EPS in patients with schizophrenia 1921, and likely be a risk factor for TD 11,22,23. Thus, with the increasing availability and use of LAI atypical antipsychotics, TD associated with LAI formulations may be a concern for clinicians and patients. Well-designed comparative studies for TD incidence with oral and LAI formulations of atypical antipsychotics are limited.

Paliperidone ER (Pali ER), an oral once-daily tablet, and paliperidone palmitate (PP), a once-monthly injectable LAI, are approved for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in USA, EU and many other countries 2428. Paliperidone (9-hydroxyrisperidone) is the active ingredient in both formulations and is an active metabolite of another atypical antipsychotic, risperidone. Paliperidone is a potent inhibitor of the dopamine D2 receptor 26; according to the dopamine supersensitivity hypothesis, the blockade of striatal D2 receptors by antipsychotic drugs up-regulates the striatal dopaminergic system and subsequently, may result in TD 29,30. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to determine the incidence of TD in each paliperidone formulation and compare the incidence rates using both spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AE) and by applying standardised research criteria.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis performed on pooled data from the acute and extension phases of 10 randomised controlled long-term clinical research studies (≥ 6 months), involving patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder treated with once-monthly injectable PP (25–150 mg eq.) or once-daily Pali ER (3–15 mg/day). Because doses of PP can be expressed both in terms of milligram equivalents (mg eq.) of paliperidone (the pharmacologically active fraction) and in milligrams of PP, the doses expressed as PP 25, 50, 100 and 150 mg eq. equate to 39, 78, 156 and 234 mg, respectively, of PP.

In all of the studies, patients were required to wash-out of their previous antipsychotic (typical/atypical) before starting paliperidone treatment. The duration of the screening/wash-out period varied from 1 to 3 weeks, depending on the study.

An Independent Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board at each study site approved the protocols of the studies included in this analysis. The studies were conducted in accordance with the ethical principles originating in the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines, applicable regulatory requirements and in compliance with the protocols. All patients provided written informed consent.

Analytical design

Studies of PP and Pali ER that met the following criteria were included: (i) Janssen Research & Development (formerly: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development) sponsored studies because access to patient-level data was required for these analyses; (ii) Assessed either PP or Pali ER and (iii) Conducted in adult patients (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed ≥ 1 year before screening with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition criteria). In addition, only studies of sufficient duration (≥ 6 months) were included.

Based on the above criteria, 10 total studies were identified- PP: n = 4, all in patients with schizophrenia (pooled sample size; n = 1689) and Pali ER: n = 6 [5: in patients with schizophrenia, 1: in patients with bipolar disorder (pooled sample size; n = 2668)] (PP: NCT00111189, NCT00210717, NCT01150448, NCT00119756; Pali ER: NCT00086320, NCT00085748, NCT00650793, NCT00077714, NCT00668837, NCT00490971). The designs and the primary results of these studies are published in detail elsewhere 3138.

Treatment-emergent tardive dyskinesia

Incidence of TD was evaluated by two methods: applying Schooler–Kane standardised research criteria for TD based on Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores 39,40 and using spontaneous reporting of AE of TD.

Spontaneously reported TD

Investigator reported terms were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Affairs (MedDRA). Events matching the preferred term ‘tardive dyskinesia’ were summarised descriptively.

Schooler–Kane standardised research criteria for TD

Case definitions for TD were based on the AIMS items 1–7, which specifically measure dyskinetic movements on a scale of 0–4. Patients who scored ≥ 2 on two or more items or ≥ 3 on a single item were considered to have qualifying scores. The AIMS assessments were performed at baseline, at regular intervals throughout the study, and at end of the study.

Schooler–Kane criteria were then applied to patients having qualifying AIMS scores to define probable or persistent TD. Schooler–Kane criteria require: (i) at least 3 months of cumulative exposure to neuroleptics; (ii) absence of other conditions that might cause involuntary movements and (iii) at least moderate dyskinetic movements in one body area (≥ 3 on AIMS) or mild dyskinetic movements in two body areas (≥ 2 on AIMS) 40. Patients who had qualifying AIMS scores for at least 3 months while on treatment were classified as having probable TD and those patients whose qualifying scores persisted for an additional 3 months were classified as having persistent TD. Patients with qualifying scores for TD at screening or baseline visits (pre-existing), though included in the analysis, were not considered to have treatment-emergent TD as per Schooler–Kane criteria.

Statistical analyses

Pooled data from all patients in the safety analysis set (all randomised and treated patients who received at least one dose during the double-blind or open-label phases) from all 10 studies (four PP and six Pali ER studies) were included. Rates of treatment-emergent TD (probable TD and persistent TD) were summarised separately for the PP studies and Pali ER studies (by indication of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). The incidences of spontaneously reported TD as AEs were summarised by treatment group.

All dyskinesias (including TD) were analysed over time by assessing the number of patients having an AIMS total score (items 1–7) ≥ 3 at each time point.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics

A total of 4357 schizophrenia (PP-treated group: = 1689; Pali ER-treated group: n = 2054) and bipolar disorder (n=614) patients were included in this analysis (safety analysis set). Studies were conducted from 2004 to 2010. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics appeared similar between both treatment groups (Tables1 and 2). The mean length of drug exposure was 279.6 days for the PP patients and 187.2 days for the Pali ER patients.

Table 1.

Demographic and baseline characteristics of patients (safety analysis set)

Parameters Paliperidone palmitate Paliperidone ER
Gender (N) 1689 2668
Men, n (%) 1001 (59.3) 1573 (59)
Age (N), years 1689 2668
Mean (SD) 39.6 (11.34) 39.6 (12.53)
BMI (N), kg/m2 1686 2664
Mean (SD) 27.3 (5.95) 26.5 (6.46)
Age at diagnosis (N), years 1685 2648
Mean (SD) 27.1 (9.01) 29.6 (11.45)
Duration of Pali Expo (N), days 1689 2668
Mean (SD) 279.6 (215.17) 187.2 (187.5)
Mean Pali Dose (N), mg/mg eq. 1688 2667
Mean (SD)* 79.5 (30.6) 9.4 (2.77)
*

Unit is mg for Paliperidone ER, and is mg eq. for Paliperidone palmitate. Paliperidone ER, paliperidone extended release; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; Expo, exposure.

Table 2.

Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients identified with tardive dyskinesia-safety analysis set

Treatment Age (years) Gender BMI (kg/m2) Age at diagnosis of schizophrenia (years) Duration of paliperidone exposure (days) Mean dose (SD) (mg/mg eq.) Actual Day of AE Onset Time to Probable TD Time to Persistent TD Actual day of disposition
Double-blind Open- label
TD as spontaneously reported adverse events
 Pali ER 29 Woman 36.0 24 402 11.2 (1.94) 157 45 402
 Pali ER 54 Woman 31.2 31 4 9.0 (0) 4 5 -
 PP 43 Man 32.6 26 197 150.0 (0) 92 197
 PP 60 Man 18.4 31 197 87.5 (23.15) 64 197
 PP 58 Woman 24.6 57 569 47.6 (7.52) 652* 652
TD using Schooler–Kane criteria
Probable TD (Persistent TD marked with*)
 Pali ER* 53 Woman 34.5 46 417 9.2 (1.53) 316 417 43 417
 PP* 43 Man 17.9 28 621 50.0 (0) 427 511 621
 PP* 57 Man 32.5 26 372 51.8 (6.68) 176 372 372
 Pali ER 79 Woman 24.7 NA 211 6.7 (1.95) 155 43 211
 Pali ER 56 Man 21.6 54 200 9.0 (0) 155 43 204
 Pali ER 57 Woman 19.8 25 336 7.7 (1.49) 309 41 378

TD, tardive dyskinesia; BMI, body mass index; Pali ER, paliperidone extended release; PP, paliperidone palmitate.

*

Persistent TD cases.

Treatment-emergent tardive dyskinesia

Incidence of TD as spontaneously reported adverse events

Three (0.18%) of 1689 PP-treated schizophrenia patients and two (0.10%) of 2054 Pali ER-treated schizophrenia patients had spontaneously reported TD as AE. There were no cases of spontaneously reported TD as an AE in the bipolar study (Pali ER) (Table3).

Table 3.

Incidence of treatment-emergent tardive dyskinesia in paliperidone extended release and paliperidone palmitate studies

Schizophrenia studies* Paliperidone palmitate studies Paliperidone ER studies
N = 1689 n (%) Event/Patient years N = 2054 n (%) Event/Patient years
Tardive dyskinesia (spontaneously reported adverse event) 3 (0.18) 3/1292.85 = 0.23% 2 (0.10) 2/1367.78 = 0.15%
Probable tardive dyskinesia (Schooler–Kane criteria) 2 (0.12) 2/1292.85 = 0.15% 4 (0.19) 4/1367.78 = 0.29%
Persistent tardive dyskinesia (Schooler–Kane criteria) 2 (0.12) 2/1292.85 = 0.15% 1 (0.05) 1/1367.78 = 0.07%
*

There was no incidence of TD in the 1 bipolar study that met inclusion criteria and hence not represented in this table; The total patient years for PP studies were 1292.85; the total patient years for Pali ER studies were 1367.78.

For these five patients, one PP-treated patient was on a fixed dose of 150 mg eq. (the highest tested dose), one Pali ER-treated patient was on a fixed dose of 9 mg; the other three patients were on flexible-dose regimen. Of these three patients on flexible dose, the mean exposures for the two PP-treated patients were 87.5 mg eq. and 47.6 mg eq. and for the Pali ER-treated patient, the mean exposure dose was 11.2 mg. At the end of study, TD was persisting in four patients (two each in PP and Pali ER groups), while it was resolved in one PP-treated patient.

None of the five patients (three in PP, two in Pali ER) discontinued the study because of TD. One PP-treated patient withdrew from the study because of AE (ejaculation delayed), and another PP-treated patient withdrew from the study because of lack of efficacy. One Pali ER-treated patient withdrew from the study because of AE (psychotic disorder). The remaining two patients completed the study.

Incidence of TD using Schooler–Kane criteria

According to Schooler–Kane criteria, 2 (0.12%) of 1689 PP-treated patients had persistent and probable TD. Among the Pali ER-treated patients (n = 2054), four (0.19%) had probable TD and one (0.05%) of four had persistent TD (Table3). There were no cases of TD identified using Schooler–Kane criteria in the bipolar study.

The mean exposure was 50.0 mg eq. and 51.8 mg eq. for the two PP-treated patients and 6.7 mg, 9.0 mg, 9.2 mg and 7.7 mg for the four Pali ER-treated patients.

Both the PP-treated patients completed the study, while only one Pali ER-treated patient (with probable TD) completed the study. For the three Pali ER-treated patients who did not complete the study, one (with persistent TD) withdrew because of scheduling problems, the second withdrew because of lost to follow-up and the remaining one withdrew because of adverse event of dyspnoea. None of the three patients withdrew because of reasons that could be directly linked to TD as defined by Schooler–Kane criteria.

There was no overlap of cases between the spontaneously reported TD as AE cases vs. those identified using Schooler–Kane criteria.

Incidence of dyskinesia over time

Incidence of all dyskinesia (total AIMS score ≥ 3 at any single visit) was highest within the first treatment month (Table4) for both PP (13.1%) and Pali ER (11.7%) treated groups and steadily decreased over time (Figure1).

Table 4.

Occurrences of dyskinesia: AIMS total score of at least 3 at a particular time point since medication initiation

  Paliperidone Palmitate Paliperidone ER
Patients exposed N AIMS Score ≥ 3 n (%) Patients exposed N AIMS Score ≥ 3 n (%)
≤ Day 1 1689 174 (10.30) 2663 187 (7.00)
> Day 1 to ≤ 1 month 122 16 (13.10) 2634 308 (11.70)
> 1 month to ≤ 2 months 668 71 (10.60) 2021 173 (8.60)
> 2 months to ≤ 3 months 921 67 (7.30) 1696 118 (7.00)
> 3 months to ≤ 4 months 280 37 (13.20) 1514 96 (6.30)
> 4 months to ≤ 5 months 236 24 (10.20) 1178 78 (6.60)
> 5 months to ≤ 6 months 430 45 (10.50) 1100 72 (6.50)
> 6 months to ≤ 7 months 222 12 (5.40) 922 59 (6.40)
> 7 months to ≤ 8 months 576 28 (4.90) 970 54 (5.60)
> 8 months to ≤ 9 months 221 9 (4.10) 793 33 (4.20)
> 9 months to ≤ 10 months 200 11 (5.50) 828 34 (4.10)
> 10 months to ≤ 11 months 348 20 (5.70) 786 28 (3.60)
> 11 months to ≤ 12 months 220 14 (6.40) 715 21 (2.90)
> 12 months to ≤ 13 months 378 31 (8.20) 725 24 (3.30)
> 13 months to ≤ 14 months 187 11 (5.90) 461 17 (3.70)
> 14 months to ≤ 15 months 122 5 (4.10) 214 6 (2.80)
> 15 months to ≤ 16 months 136 7 (5.10) 135 5 (3.70)
> 16 months to ≤ 17 months 157 6 (3.80) 136 4 (2.90)
> 17 months to ≤ 18 months 157 8 (5.10) 48 2 (4.20)
> 18 months to ≤ 19 months 137 6 (4.40) 82 2 (2.40)
> 19 months to ≤ 20 months 119 5 (4.20) 23 1 (4.30)
> 20 months to ≤ 21 months 107 9 (8.40) 64 1 (1.60)
> 21 months to ≤ 22 months 94 4 (4.30) 16 0 (0)
> 22 months to ≤ 23 months 88 7 (8.00) 52 0 (0)
> 23 months to ≤ 24 months 78 2 (2.60) 16 0 (0)
> 24 months 112 7 (6.30) 48 0 (0)

AIMS, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Incidence of dyskinesia over time. Dyskinesia defined as abnormal involuntary movement scale total score of at least 3.

Discussion

Atypical antipsychotics, effective in the control of both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, provide clinical advantages over conventional antipsychotics in part by having a comparatively lower incidence of TD 4,41,42. The present post hoc analysis from 10 paliperidone studies was designed to compare the incidence of TD between the LAI (PP) and oral formulation (Pali ER) of paliperidone, a potent inhibitor of dopamine D2 receptor. Only studies of sufficient duration (≥ 6 months) were included because TD is expected with a long-term treatment of antipsychotic medications and also the Schooler–Kane criteria used in this study requires a time component to accurately diagnose TD. This post hoc analysis revealed that irrespective of the formulation, paliperidone treatment has a low risk for TD (< 0.2%). Our results were generally comparable whether TD was assessed by spontaneous AE reporting or by AIMS definition, according to the standardised Schooler–Kane criteria. The risk estimates for persistent TD in this limited dataset were 0.12% for PP and 0.05% for Pali ER. The low rates of TD reported in both the oral and LAI treatment groups may reflect the similar and expected rates of EPS seen with these two treatments in a recent pooled analysis since rates of EPS may predict future TD 43.

The TD incidence rate reported in this study is consistent with rates reported using another atypical antipsychotic where the annualised TD incidence was 3.9% for atypical antipsychotics and 5.5% for the conventional antipsychotics 16. A recently published systematic review showed that the TD rate with oral atypical antipsychotics was 0.8% (range: 0.0–1.5%) in adults with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder compared with 5.4% (range: 4.1–7.4%) among adult patients who received haloperidol 4. In another study with risperidone LAI, the rate of treatment-emergent TD was low (0.94%; 1.19% annually) and there was no evidence of a dose-dependent effect.

Notably, though the overall incidence rates were similar in this analysis, a disparity was observed between the TD cases revealed by Schooler–Kane criteria and those identified by spontaneous AE reports. These differences in individual cases may exist as AEs were defined clinically and there is a possibility that clinicians may not have focused on the persistence and classified them as dyskinesias. However, on the other hand, the Schooler–Kane criteria are widely accepted and utilised to define neuroleptic-induced TD, with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity for identifying TD 44.

The incidence of dyskinesias based on AIMS score at a single time point in both the PP and Pali ER groups was highest in the first month of treatment and then steadily decreased over time. This comparatively high rate in the beginning may at least partly be attributable to early withdrawal dyskinesias, related to the rapid discontinuation of the previous antipsychotic medications by the patients. Longer cumulative exposure did not appear to increase the risk of dyskinesia in the populations assessed in this study. However, the same cannot be said for TD as there was not enough cases of TD with paliperidone to comment. This result is consistent with previous studies which showed most significant improvement in TD in the first month of risperidone and olanzapine treatment in patients previously treated with typical antipsychotics 45,46. The observation that both PP and Pali ER treatment result in similar, low incidence rates of TD that do not worsen over time, may aid clinicians in deciding whether to switch a patient between oral and LAI treatment if required, and depending on the patient's response to treatment.

The strength of this meta-analysis is that it used patient-level data from controlled clinical trials. However, there are several limitations. This was a post hoc analysis and meant to be hypothesis generating only and needs to be confirmed with prospectively designed trials. All the studies selected in the post hoc analysis were company sponsored studies with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinically significant TD was often an exclusion criteria in these studies, and hence there is a possibility that patients at higher risk for developing TD following paliperidone treatment may have been excluded from the study. There is also a possibility that patients with dyskinesias may have preferentially discontinued from the studies and thereby influencing the apparent incidence of TD in this study.

Earlier studies have indicated that the benefits of a lower TD risk with atypical antipsychotics may be reduced at higher doses 47,48, however we could not determine whether there is any association between dose and incidence of TD because of the flexible-dose design of some of the studies and the small number of TD cases detected overall. Another limitation of the current analysis is that no definite conclusions could be drawn about the comparative risk for TD among patients with bipolar disorder because of the limited sample size or schizoaffective disorder because of no studies being of sufficient length. Several atypical antipsychotics are commonly used as adjunctive or even primary treatment for manic symptoms 49 and data to date suggest that patients suffering from mood disorders may be at higher risk for developing TD, compared with patients with schizophrenia 50. In addition, the lower risk for acute and chronic TD effects associated with paliperidone has to be weighed against other potential AEs, particularly weight gain, hyperglycaemia, hyperprolactinemia and dyslipidaemia, which may occur more frequently with second generation antipsychotic treatment. More robust and carefully designed, long-term studies across the entire age range, ethnic backgrounds and including more women are required to confirm these findings and to estimate the true risk of TD associated with paliperidone treatment.

Conclusion

In this post hoc analysis of two sets of studies with patient-level data, the risk for TD with paliperidone treatment with the oral or injectable formulation was low and comparable to data from published literature with other atypical antipsychotics. The risk of TD from paliperidone appears to be similar regardless of administration route or release profiles (monthly LAI vs. daily oral dosing) in the treatment of schizophrenia. Time to onset of dyskinesia was highest in the first month, and then steadily decreased over time. Longer cumulative exposure did not appear to increase the risk of dyskinesia in the populations assessed in this study. However, the same cannot be said for TD as there was not enough cases of TD with paliperidone to comment.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funding from Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Dr Shalini Nair (SIRO Clinpharm Pvt. Ltd.) provided writing assistance and Dr Wendy Battisti (Janssen Research & Development, LLC) provided additional scientific review and editorial support for the development of this manuscript. The authors thank participants from the studies used for this analysis, as well as the investigators for their participation in these studies.

Author contributions

Drs. Isaac Nuamah and Haiyan Xu were the statisticians for this post hoc analysis. All authors contributed to the data interpretation of the results, development of this manuscript and approved the final manuscript for submission. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors met the International Council of Medical Journal Editors' criteria for authorship and all those who met those criteria are listed as authors.

References

  • 1.Kang NR, Kim MD. Tardive dyskinesia: treatment with aripiprazole. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2011;9:1–8. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2011.9.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Waln O, Jankovic J. An update on tardive dyskinesia: from phenomenology to treatment. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2013;3:pii: tre-03-161-4138-1. doi: 10.7916/D88P5Z71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cloud LJ, Zutshi D, Factor SA. Tardive dyskinesia: therapeutic options for an increasingly common disorder. Neurotherapeutics. 2014;11(1):166–76. doi: 10.1007/s13311-013-0222-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Correll CU, Leucht S, Kane JM. Lower risk for tardive dyskinesia associated with second-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review of 1-year studies. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:414–25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Greil W, Haag H, Rossnagl G, Ruther E. Effect of anticholinergics on tardive dyskinesia. A controlled discontinuation study. Br J Psychiatry. 1984;145:304–10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.145.3.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Margolese HC, Ferreri F. Management of conventional antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2007;32:72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rana AQ, Chaudry ZM, Blanchet PJ. New and emerging treatments for symptomatic tardive dyskinesia. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:1329–40. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S32328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Merrill RM, Lyon JL, Matiaco PM. Tardive and spontaneous dyskinesia incidence in the general population. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aquino CC, Lang AE. Tardive dyskinesia syndromes: current concepts. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(Suppl 1):S113–7. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frascarelli M, Paolemili M, Gallo M, et al. Tardive dyskinesia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment. Riv Psichiatr. 2013;48:187–96. doi: 10.1708/1292.14287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Novick D, Haro JM, Bertsch J, Haddad PM. Incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia: thirty-six-month results from the European schizophrenia outpatient health outcomes study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;30:531–40. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181f14098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tenback DE, van Harten PN, Slooff CJ, van Os J. Evidence that early extrapyramidal symptoms predict later tardive dyskinesia: a prospective analysis of 10,000 patients in the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1438–40. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.8.1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Waln O, Jankovic J. An update on tardive dyskinesia: from phenomenology to treatment. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) doi: 10.7916/D88P5Z71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23858394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gershanik OS, Gomez Arevalo GJ. Typical and atypical neuroleptics. Handb Clin Neurol. 2011;100:579–99. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52014-2.00042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Woerner MG, Correll CU, Alvir JM, et al. Incidence of tardive dyskinesia with risperidone or olanzapine in the elderly: results from a 2-year, prospective study in antipsychotic-naive patients. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1738–46. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Correll CU, Schenk EM. Tardive dyskinesia and new antipsychotics. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21:151–6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f53132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dolder CR, Jeste DV. Incidence of tardive dyskinesia with typical versus atypical antipsychotics in very high risk patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53:1142–5. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gharabawi GM, Bossie CA, Zhu Y, et al. An assessment of emergent tardive dyskinesia and existing dyskinesia in patients receiving long-acting, injectable risperidone: results from a long-term study. Schizophr Res. 2005;77:129–39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haider I. A controlled trial of fluphenazine enanthate in hospitalized chronic schizophrenics. Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114:837–41. doi: 10.1192/bjp.114.512.837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rosenheck RA, Krystal JH, Lew R, et al. Long-acting risperidone and oral antipsychotics in unstable schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:842–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhornitsky S, Stip E. Oral versus long-acting injectable antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and special populations at risk for treatment nonadherence: a systematic review. Schizophr Res Treatment. 2012;2012:407171. doi: 10.1155/2012/407171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Detke HC, Zhao F, Witte MM. Efficacy of olanzapine long-acting injection in patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia: an insight from effect size comparison with historical oral data. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fleischhacker WW, Eerdekens M, Karcher K, et al. Treatment of schizophrenia with long-acting injectable risperidone: a 12-month open-label trial of the first long-acting second-generation antipsychotic. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:1250–7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Perry CM. Paliperidone extended release: in adolescents with schizophrenia. Paediatr Drugs. 2012;14:417–27. doi: 10.2165/11209900-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Samtani MN, Gopal S, Gassmann-Mayer C, et al. Dosing and switching strategies for paliperidone palmitate: based on population pharmacokinetic modelling and clinical trial data. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:829–45. doi: 10.2165/11591690-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Spina E, Crupi R. Safety and efficacy of paliperidone extended-release in acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2011;3:27–41. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Invega®. Prescribing Information http://wwwjanssencom/janssen/shared/pi/invega (Accessed 2 January 2014)
  • 28. INVEGA®. SUSTENNA™ Prescribing information http://wwwinvegasustennacom/invegasustenna/shared/pi/invegasustennapdf (accessed 2 January 2014)
  • 29.Agid O, Mamo D, Ginovart N, et al. Striatal vs extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptors in antipsychotic response–a double-blind PET study in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:1209–15. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mela F, Marti M, Bido S, et al. In vivo evidence for a differential contribution of striatal and nigral D1 and D2 receptors to L-DOPA induced dyskinesia and the accompanying surge of nigral amino acid levels. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45:573–82. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Emsley R, Berwaerts J, Eerdekens M, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral paliperidone extended-release tablets in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: pooled data from three 52-week open-label studies. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;23:343–56. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328314e1f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kramer M, Simpson G, Maciulis V, et al. Paliperidone extended-release tablets for prevention of symptom recurrence in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27:6–14. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31802dda4a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Coppola D, Liu Y, Gopal S, et al. A one-year prospective study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the highest available dose of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fleischhacker WW, Gopal S, Lane R, et al. A randomized trial of paliperidone palmitate and risperidone long-acting injectable in schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;15(1):107–18. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711001076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gopal S, Vijapurkar U, Lim P, et al. A 52-week open-label study of the safety and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 2011;25:685–97. doi: 10.1177/0269881110372817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hough D, Gopal S, Vijapurkar U, et al. Paliperidone palmitate maintenance treatment in delaying the time-to-relapse in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Schizophr Res. 2010;116:107–17. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hough D, Lindenmayer JP, Gopal S, et al. Safety and tolerability of deltoid and gluteal injections of paliperidone palmitate in schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33:1022–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tzimos A, Samokhvalov V, Kramer M, et al. Safety and tolerability of oral paliperidone extended-release tablets in elderly patients with schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with six-month open-label extension. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16:31–43. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31815a3e7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guy W. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication (ADM) 76-338. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology; pp. 534–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schooler NR, Kane JM. Research diagnoses for tardive dyskinesia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:486–7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290040080014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kennedy E, Song F, Hunter R, et al. Risperidone versus typical antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Turner MS, Stewart DW. Review of the evidence for the long-term efficacy of atypical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. J Psychopharmacol. 2006;20:20–37. doi: 10.1177/1359786806071243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gopal S, Liu Y, Alphs L, et al. Incidence and time course of extrapyramidal symptoms with oral and long-acting injectable paliperidone: a posthoc pooled analysis of seven randomized controlled studies. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1381–92. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S49944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Janno S. Assessment of Neuroleptic-Induced Movement Disorders in a Naturalistic Schizophrenia Population. Finland: University of Helsinki; 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chan HY, Chiang SC, Chang CJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of risperidone and olanzapine for schizophrenic patients with neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:1226–33. doi: 10.4088/jcp.09m05155yel. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kinon BJ, Jeste DV, Kollack-Walker S, et al. Olanzapine treatment for tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia patients: a prospective clinical trial with patients randomized to blinded dose reduction periods. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004;28:985–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Davidson M, Harvey PD, Vervarcke J, et al. A long-term, multicenter, open-label study of risperidone in elderly patients with psychosis. On behalf of the Risperidone Working Group. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:506–14. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200006)15:6<506::aid-gps146>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jeste DV, Okamoto A, Napolitano J, et al. Low incidence of persistent tardive dyskinesia in elderly patients with dementia treated with risperidone. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1150–5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.7.1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ghaemi SN. New treatments for bipolar disorder: the role of atypical neuroleptic agents. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(Suppl 14):33–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kane JM. Tardive dyskinesia in affective disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(Suppl 5):43–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES