Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2014 Oct 8;312(14):1465–1467. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13183

Tobacco use and oral HPV16 infection

Carole Fakhry 1, Maura L Gillison 2, Gypsyamber D’Souza 3
PMCID: PMC4266546  NIHMSID: NIHMS647271  PMID: 25291584

To the editor

Oral human papillomavirus type16 (HPV16), a sexually transmitted infection, is believed to be responsible for the rise in incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers in the United States.1 An association between self-reported number of cigarettes currently smoked per day and oral HPV prevalence has been observed.2,3 We investigated associations between objective biomarkers reflective of all current tobacco exposures (environmental, smoked and smokeless tobacco) and oral HPV16 prevalence.

Methods

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a cross-sectional, stratified multistage probability sample of the US population.4 The NHANES was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from participants. In 2009–2012, the response rate was 73.4%. Mobile examination center participants 14–69 years old were eligible for oral HPV DNA testing. Exfoliated oral cells were collected using a 30-second oral rinse and gargle, and tested for HPV16 as previously reported.2

Computer-assisted self-interviews were used to ascertain self-reported tobacco use and sexual behaviors. Self-reported tobacco use for the past 5 days included any nicotine-containing product. Biomarkers of recent tobacco use included serum cotinine, a major nicotine metabolite, and urinary NNAL (4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol), a tobacco-specific, carcinogenic metabolite.4

Of 20,293 participants interviewed, analysis was restricted to participants aged 18 to 59 years (n=8527) with data on number of oral sexual partners, oral HPV16 and recent tobacco use. The principal outcome was oral HPV16 infection. NHANES sample weights were used to estimate prevalence. Mean biomarker values were compared using Wald tests. For modeling, cotinine and NNAL were log-transformed and considered as continuous and categorical variables. The association of tobacco use with oral HPV16 was explored using logistic regression. All multivariable models included variables considered significant (2-sided P<0.05) in bivariable analysis and important factors based on the literature.2 Analyses were performed using SUDAAN software 11.0.1.

Results

Among 6887 participants, 2012 (28.6%, 95%CI=26.5%–30.9%) were current tobacco users and 63 (1.0%, 95% CI =0.8%–1.3%) had oral HPV16 detected. Current tobacco users were more likely than non-users to be male, younger, less educated, and to have a higher number of lifetime oral sexual partners (Table 1). In bivariable analysis, self-reported and biological measures of tobacco exposure as well as oral sexual behavior were significantly associated with prevalent oral HPV16 infection (Table 2). Oral HPV16 prevalence was greater in current tobacco users (2.0%, 95%CI=1.3–3.1) compared with never/former tobacco users (0.6%, 95%CI=0.4–0.9), p=0.004. Mean cotinine (157.7 vs. 57.2 ng/mL, p=0.002) and NNAL levels (0.36 vs 0.12 ng/mL, p=0.020) were higher in individuals with versus without oral HPV16 infection.

Table 1.

Description of NHANES study population included in analysis, by current self-reported tobacco use* (yes/no used any product containing nicotine in the past 5 days)

Overall Current tobacco user No current tobacco use PValue

N= 6887 (%) N= 2012 (%) N= 4875 (%)
Gender <0.001
Male 3494 (51.2) 1240 (61.4) 2254 (47.2)
Female 3393 (48.8) 772 (38.6) 2621 (52.8)
Age <0.001
18–29 2219 (29.2) 685 (32.5) 1534 (27.9)
30–39 1551 (21.9) 454 (20.9) 1097 (22.3)
40–49 1596 (24.5) 476 (25.4) 1120 (24.1)
50–59 1521 (24.4) 397 (21.2) 1124 (25.6)
Race/Ethnicityˆ <0.001
Non-Hispanic white 2724 (64.2) 996 (68.3) 1728 (62.6)
Non-Hispanic black 1548 (12.2) 498 (13.8) 1050 (11.5)
Hispanic/ Other/ Multi-race 2615 (23.6) 518 (17.8) 2097 (25.9)
Education <0.001
< High school graduate 1599 (16.4) 595 (23.9) 1004 (13.4)
High school graduate or equivalent 1560 (21.6) 604 (29.3) 956 (18.5)
Some college 2142 (32.5) 627 (33.7) 1515 (32.0)
≥ College graduate 1579 (29.5) 185 (13.1) 1394 (36.0)
Annual household income <0.001
< $35,000 2723 (30.8) 1069 (43.8) 1654 (25.5)
$35,000 to $64,999 1462 (24.5) 391 (23.8) 1071 (24.8)
$65,000 to $99,999 954 (19.1) 208 (16.0) 746 (20.3)
≥ $100,000 1137 (25.7) 186 (16.4) 951 (29.4)
Ever married 4640 (75.5) 1338 (72.4) 3302 (76.7) 0.009
Smoked any cigarette past 5 days 1725 (23.3) 1725 (81.3) 0 (0.0) <0.001
Smoked a pipe past 5 days 16 (0.2) 16 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 0.007
Used snuff past 5 days 34 (0.8) 34 (2.8) 0 (0.0) <0.001
Used chewing tobacco past 5 days 112 (2.1) 112 (7.3) 0 (0.0) <0.001
Used marijuana or hashish in past month 1009 (14.2) 642 (30.4) 367 (7.6) <0.001
Drank alcohol regularly# 2923 (48.3) 1141 (59.0) 1782 (44.1) <0.001
Ever performed oral sex 5393 (86.0) 1727 (91.0) 3666 (84.0) <0.001
Number of people performed oral sex on in lifetime <0.001
0 1359 (14.1) 254 (9.1) 1105 (16.1)
1 to 2 2369 (35.4) 531 (25.5) 1838 (39.3)
3 to 5 1612 (26.0) 547 (28.1) 1065 (25.1)
6 to 10 696 (12.5) 282 (16.2) 414 (11.0)
≥ 11 684 (12.1) 355 (21.1) 329 (8.4)
*

This includes cigarettes, pipes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff and nicotine replacement.

ˆ

Race and ethnicity were self-identified by participants using options defined by NHANES.

#

Regular alcohol use was defined as alcohol at least once per week, on average, past year for everyone twenty years and older. For those 18–19 years old, regular alcohol use was defined as at least one drink of alcohol on 40 or more days in lifetime.

Table 2.

Bivariable and multivariable associations of biomarkers and behavioral measures of current tobacco use with oral HPV16. Bolding represents results that are statistically significant (p<0.05).

Oral HPV 16

N Weighted Prevalence Bivariable OR (95%CI) N Multivariable£ OR (95%CI)
Cotinine (log base 10; ng/mL) 6598 1.41 (1.15, 1.72) 5889 1.31 (1.07, 1.60)
Cotinine quartiles (ng/mL)
Below detection limit 1432 0.3% Ref 1281 Ref
< 0.033 1207 0.9% 2.98 (0.73, 12.28) 1075 2.67 (0.63, 11.24)
0.033 to 0.179 1298 0.7% 2.11 (0.60, 7.41) 1134 2.00 (0.57, 6.99)
0.180 to 126 1426 1.2% 3.88 (0.99, 15.23) 1268 3.67 (0.88, 15.36)
>126 1235 2.0% 6.49 (1.99, 21.18) 1131 4.34 (1.14, 16.53)
p-trend 0.003 0.02
NNAL (log base 10; ng/mL) 6681 1.80 (1.34, 2.44) 5942 1.68 (1.23, 2.28)
NNAL quartiles (ng/mL)
Below detection limit 2174 0.4% Ref 1943 Ref
< 0.002 1120 0.8% 2.01 (0.60, 6.77) 976 2.00 (0.53, 7.51)
0.002 – 0.009 1095 0.4% 0.95 (0.28, 3.19) 964 0.96 (0.24, 3.81)
0.010 – 0.190 1188 1.9% 4.94 (1.57, 15.55) 1037 4.52 (1.17, 17.38)
>0.190 1104 2.3% 5.86 (1.68, 20.46) 1022 4.54 (1.19, 17.30)
p-trend 0.002 0.01
Used nicotine in last 5 days
No 4875 0.6% Ref 4315 Ref
Yes 2012 2.0% 3.54 (1.79, 6.98) 1817 2.70 (1.35, 5.41)
Number of cigarettes per day
Did not smoke cigarettes, pipes or cigars in last 5 days 5007 0.7% Ref 4434 Ref
<10 843 1.3% 1.90 (0.53, 6.81) 740 1.89 (0.56, 6.43)
10 to <20 463 3.0% 4.60 (1.94, 10.89) 424 3.97 (1.56, 10.13)
20 to <30 329 1.7% 2.59 (0.73, 9.11) 306 2.08 (0.57, 7.65)
≥30 88 4.1% 6.33 (1.25, 32.20) 84 3.15 (0.70, 14.20)
p-trend 0.05 0.22
Pack-years of tobacco
0 4105 0.7% Ref 3637 Ref
>0 to <5 1262 0.7% 1.07 (0.26, 4.31) 1115 0.84 (0.22, 3.23)
5 to <10 368 2.6% 4.04 (1.35, 12.11) 337 2.88 (0.99, 8.41)
10 to <20 442 1.7% 2.65 (0.96, 7.29) 395 1.77 (0.66, 4.76)
≥20 545 2.6% 4.09 (1.39, 12.01) 505 2.79 (1.01, 7.72)
p-trend 0.008 0.05
Lifetime number of oral sex partners
0 1359 0.5% Ref 1177 Ref
1–2 2369 0.4% 0.90 (0.22, 3.74) 2160 0.76 (0.18, 3.18)
3–5 1612 0.6% 1.29 (0.32, 5.17) 1503 1.06 (0.25, 4.61)
6–10 696 1.4% 3.03 (0.62, 14.76) 655 2.24 (0.43, 11.56)
≥11 684 4.0% 9.07 (1.67, 49.24) 637 5.89 (0.91, 38.10)
p-trend 0.004 0.03
£

:Adjusted for age (18–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59), gender, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, other), income (<$35000, 35000–64999, 65,000–99,999, ≥100,000) and number of lifetime partners performed oral sex on (0, 1–2, 3–5, 6–10, ≥11). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests had p-values >0.05 for all multivariable models using the Satterthwaite F tests, and for all models except lifetime number of oral sexual partners, NNAL quintiles and nicotine in the last 5 days using the Wald F tests.

All biomarkers of tobacco exposure remained associated with oral HPV16 infection after adjustment for other factors (Table 2). Significant dose-response relationships were observed between cotinine (p-trend=0.02) or NNAL (p-trend= 0.01) levels and odds of oral HPV16 infection (Table 2). Each log increase in cotinine, approximating 3 cigarettes per day, was independently associated with oral HPV16 prevalence, with an adjusted OR of 1.31 (95%CI=1.07–1.60). Each log increase in NNAL, approximating 4 cigarettes per day, was independently associated with oral HPV16 prevalence, with an adjusted OR of 1.68 (95%CI=1.23–2.28).

Discussion

In this large cross-sectional, population-based study, we demonstrated strong and consistent dose-response relationships between behavioral and objective biomarkers of current tobacco use and oral HPV16 infection. Tobacco use is an established co-factor for the development of cervical cancer, for which HPV infection is a necessary cause.5 Tobacco use has local and systemic immunosuppressive effects,6 however the specific biological mechanisms underlying our observed associations are unknown. Tobacco use may alter determinants of oral HPV16 prevalence, such as incidence, persistence or re-activation of infection.

These findings highlight the need to evaluate the role of tobacco in the natural history of oral HPV16 infection and progression to malignancy. Although adjusted for sexual behavior, we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that tobacco use is a marker for risky behavior. Additional limitations include some unstable estimates and a cross-sectional study design that precludes our ability to determine temporality or causation.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support: This study was supported by P50DE019032, R01DE021395, R01DE023175 (NIDCR), Milton J. Dance Head and Neck Center, and Merck. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Drs. D’Souza and Gillison had previous research support from Merck Inc. Dr. D’Souza had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Timothy S. McNeel, B.A. (Information Management Services, Inc.) assisted with statistical analyses and received compensation for this role.

References

  • 1.Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4294–4301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gillison ML, Broutian T, Pickard RK, et al. Prevalence of oral HPV infection in the United States, 2009–2010. JAMA. 2012 Feb 15;307(7):693–703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chaturvedi AK, Graubard BI, Pickard RK, Xiao W, Gillison ML. High-Risk Oral Human Papillomavirus Load in the US Population, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2010. J Infect Dis. 2014 May 2; doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.NHANES. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS); 2009–10 & 2011–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. Accessed May, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bosch FX, de Sanjose S. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Disease markers. 2007;23(4):213–227. doi: 10.1155/2007/914823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sopori M. Effects of cigarette smoke on the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 May;2(5):372–377. doi: 10.1038/nri803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES