Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Breeding Science logoLink to Breeding Science
. 2014 Dec 1;64(4):404–408. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.64.404

Development and validation of DNA markers linked to Sdvy-1, a common bean gene conferring resistance to the yellowing strain of Soybean dwarf virus

Yoko Yamashita 1,*, Toru Takeuchi 1, Masataka Okuyama 2, Jun Sasaki 2, Kakumasa Onodera 2, Mikako Sato 1, Chihiro Souma 1, Shigehiko Ebe 3
PMCID: PMC4267316  PMID: 25914596

Abstract

The yellowing strain of Soybean dwarf virus (SbDV-YS) causes yellowing and yield loss in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). The most effective control is achieved through breeding for resistance. An indeterminate climbing cultivar with a white seed coat, ‘Oofuku’, is resistant to SbDV-YS in inoculation tests. We crossed ‘Oofuku’ with an elite cultivar, ‘Taisho-Kintoki’, which is SbDV-YS-susceptible, determinate dwarf with a red-purple seed coat, and performed amplified-fragment-length polymorphism analysis of F3 lines. From nucleotide sequences of the resistant-specific fragments and their flanking regions, we developed five DNA markers, of which DV86, DV386, and DV398 were closely linked to Sdvy-1, a resistance gene. Using the markers, we developed ‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’, the near-isogenic lines (NILs) incorporating Sdvy-1 in the background of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’. The NILs had similar growth habit, maturity date and seed shape to those of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’. The quality of boiled beans was also similar, except that the NILs had more seed coat cracking than ‘Taisho-Kintoki’. The NILs showed no SbDV-YS infection in inoculation tests. We suggest that Sdvy-1 is a useful source of SbDV-YS resistance in common bean.

Keywords: AFLP, disease resistance, kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris, SCAR marker, seed coat color

Introduction

Soybean dwarf virus (SbDV), in the family Luteoviridae, is persistently transmitted by the foxglove aphid, Aulacorthum solani. SbDV was first reported in soybean (Glycine max) in Japan (Tamada et al. 1969) and has been found in various legumes worldwide, including those in Australia, Ethiopia, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Tunisia, and the USA (Abraham et al. 2007, Johnstone and McLean 1987, Najar et al. 2003, Tadesse et al. 1999, Tamada 1973, Wilson and Close 1973).

SbDV infection in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was first reported in Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan. In this region, the dwarfing strain, SbDV-DS and the yellowing strain, SbDV-YS, are prevalent. Only SbDV-YS is infectious to common bean, whereas both strains can infect other legumes, such as soybean (Tamada 1973). SbDV-YS-infected common bean plants show interveinal chlorosis and produce few or no seeds.

‘Taisho-Kintoki’, a leading common bean cultivar planted in Hokkaido for more than 60 years, is popular for its red-purple seed coat and fine cooking qualities. However, its susceptibility to SbDV-YS hinders its stable production. Insecticides and reflective plastic film control the foxglove aphid but are costly (Mizukoshi et al. 1991, 1992). The most effective way to prevent SbDV-YS infection is through breeding for resistance.

Differences in resistance to SbDV-YS among common bean cultivars have been reported (Onodera and Ebe 2003, Tamada 1975). When inoculated with SbDV-YS, ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ showed severe symptoms, whereas the white-seeded indeterminate climber ‘Oofuku’ remained symptomless. Segregation analysis of crosses between the two cultivars revealed that the SbDV-YS resistance derived from ‘Oofuku’ is controlled by a single dominant gene, Sdvy-1 (Soybean dwarf virus, the yellowing strain) (Ebe et al. 2002).

Amplified-fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis is a powerful tool used to identify genomic regions linked to a trait; it is highly reliable, and no prior sequence knowledge is necessary (Vos et al. 1995). In this study, we performed AFLP analysis of a cross between ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ and ‘Oofuku’ to identify fragments specific to Sdvy-1 in common bean, whose genome sequence was not available until 2013. We designed sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers linked to Sdvy-1 and used them to develop near-isogenic lines incorporating Sdvy-1 (Sdvy-1-NILs) in the background of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’, which we then evaluated for resistance to SbDV-YS. The ultimate goal is to develop SbDV-YS-resistant cultivars with similar agronomic traits and eating qualities to those of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

For AFLP analysis, we used 102 F3 lines derived from a cross between ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ × ‘Oofuku’ (Sdvy-1 donor). By backcrossing against ‘Taisho-Kintoki’, we developed two Sdvy-1-NILs, ‘Toiku-B79’ (BC5F7) and ‘Toiku-B80’ (BC6F7). The NILs were selected based on their genotypes at SCAR markers DV86, DV386, and DV398 (Table 1) and agronomic traits (growth habit and seed coat color).

Table 1.

SCAR markers developed in this study

Marker Type Primer Sense Sequence (5′ to 3′) Reference sequencesa Specificity
DV86 Co-dominant DV86-11 Forward CGTTTAGAAACACCATGAATTCA AB897684, AB897685 Oofuku
DV86-12 Reverse CACTTTCTTTCATAAATTTAATGGACTG Common
DV86-13 Forward GTGTTCGAAGTTGTTTAAACGAC Taisho-Kintoki
DV309 Co-dominant DV309-11 Forward GGGTTGAAAACTAAATGGTAG AB897686, AB897687 Taisho-Kintoki
DV309-15 Forward CTAAAACTAGTAATCTGAGACAGATG Oofuku
DV309-20 Reverse GTTTTTGAAAGAGCAGAAAGGTG Common
DV353 Co-dominant DV353-06A Reverse CCATTAATTTATCTCTTTATGAGTG AB897691, AB897692 Common
DV353-07 Forward CAGGTGAATCAGTGATGAAG Taisho-Kintoki
DV353-13 Forward GCATGGACCATCATCTCG Oofuku
DV386 Co-dominant DV386-16 Reverse CAATACGTCCTCCACATAGAGA AB897688, AB897689 Oofuku
DV386-27 Forward GGATGGAAGGATGCTCTC Common
DV386-28 Reverse GATGATTCCTTGATCATAACG Taisho-Kintoki
DV398 Dominant DV398-05 Forward GGAGATTGAGGTAGCAGAAAG AB897690 Oofuku
DV398-16 Reverse CCTGTAGATGTATAATACACATGCTTG Oofuku
Open in a new tab
a

Accession no. assigned from DDBJ (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp).

AFLP analysis

DNA was extracted from fresh leaves by a modified CTAB method (Suzuki et al. 2012). We used two bulked samples, one from 12 resistant F3 plants and the other from 12 susceptible F3 plants, all plants from different lines. AFLP analysis was performed following the method of Vos et al. (1995) as modified by Suzuki et al. (2013). EcoRI (E) primers were labeled with fluorescent dye (6-FAM or VIC). Selective amplification was performed using combinations of E primers with three selective nucleotides and MseI (M) primers with three selective nucleotides (E-NNN/M-NNN). The amplification products were analyzed on an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA) with GeneScan software and a GeneScan-500 LIZ size standard.

Development of DNA markers

Amplified fragments specific to the resistant bulk were extracted, purified, concentrated (Suzuki et al. 2013), and sequenced by inverse PCR (Ochman et al. 1988). We designed SCAR markers 18 to 28 nucleotides long with a GC content of 28% to 56% (Table 1). PCR was performed following the protocol of Suzuki et al. (2013).

Evaluation of SbDV-YS resistance

We evaluated SbDV-YS resistance following inoculation of plants by SbDV-YS-infected aphids (Onodera and Ebe 2003). Inoculated plants were grown either in a greenhouse (F3 lines) or in an experimental field of Tokachi Agricultural Experiment Station (AES) (Shikaoi, Japan; 43°05′N, 142°59′E). Approximately two months after SbDV-YS inoculation, plants with yellowing symptoms were counted and the percentage of symptomatic plants (%SP) was calculated. SbDV-YS infection was further confirmed by triple antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies (Mikoshiba and Honda 2000).

Agronomic trait analysis

The Sdvy-1-NILs were grown in the field of Tokachi AES (Memuro, Japan; 42°53′N, 143°04′E) and Kitami AES (Kunneppu, Japan; 43°45′N, 143°43′E). Seeds were sown on 26 May (Memuro) and 22 May 2009 (Kunneppu) at 20-cm intervals in rows 60 cm apart. In Memuro, each line was grown in four 12.0-m2 plots, with 200 plants per plot. In Kunneppu, each line was grown in three 9.6-m2 plots, with 160 plants per plot. We recorded and evaluated flowering and maturity dates, plant height, number of pods per plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield, and %SP in each plot.

Evaluation of seed appearance and boiled bean quality

We measured the length, width, and thickness of 60 seeds of the two NILs and ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ harvested from the Memuro field. The seed coat color of 20 to 30 raw or boiled seeds was measured by a CM-3500d spectrophotometer (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan), and L*, a* and b* were calculated. For evaluation of boiled bean quality, three replicates of 100 seeds were soaked in 350 mL water at 25°C for 18 h and then boiled at 98°C for 20 min. The hardness of the whole seed and of the seed coat was measured by a TA-XT2 texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, UK), and means of 20 seeds in each replicate were determined.

Results

Development of DNA markers linked to Sdvy-1

We selected five AFLP fragments that were specific to the SbDV-YS-resistant bulk (E-AGT/M-ACC-86, E-AGC/M-TGC-309, E-ATG/M-CTC-353, E-AGT/M-TTA-386 and E-AAA/M-TTA-398). We developed SCAR markers on the basis of differences in the nucleotide sequences of the AFLP fragments and their flanking regions between the resistant and susceptible bulks, and designed the co-dominant markers DV309, DV86, DV386, and DV353, and the dominant selectable marker DV398, which amplified the resistant ‘Oofuku’ genotype (Table 1). Recombination among the SCAR markers was found in 5 of the 102 F3 lines. Comparison of the genotypes and SbDV-YS resistance identified DV86, DV386, and DV398 as the more closely linked to Sdvy-1 than DV309 and DV353.

Development of Sdvy-1-NILs ‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’

To develop Sdvy-1-NILs in the background of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’, we screened 600 BCnF2 (n = 1–6) plants with SCAR markers DV86, DV386, and DV398, and selected plants with the ‘Oofuku’ genotype at two or three markers. We evaluated the growth habit and seed coat color of the selected plants in BCnF3 lines and chose only dwarf lines with a red-purple seed coat. We obtained only two Sdvy-1-NILs with a red-purple seed coat, which were later named ‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’. The NILs carried the ‘Oofuku’ genotype at markers DV386 and DV398 and the ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ genotype at DV86 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Growth habit, seed coat color and genotypes of Sdvy-1-NILs

Cultivar Growth habit Seed coat color Genotypea
DV86 DV386 DV398
Toiku-B79 BC5F7 Determinate dwarf Red-purple T O O
Toiku-B80 BC6F7 Determinate dwarf Red-purple T O O
Taisho-Kintoki – Determinate dwarf Red-purple T T T
Oofuku – Indeterminate climber White O O O
Open in a new tab
a

O (‘Oofuku’ type), T (‘Taisho-Kintoki’ type).

SbDV-YS resistance and agronomic traits of Sdvy-1-NILs

In the inoculation test, no SbDV-YS infection was observed in either NIL, but 76.9% of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ plants were symptomatic (Table 3). In the field, no symptoms were observed in either NIL, but %SP of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ was 0.2% in Memuro and 7.3% in Kunneppu (Table 4). Both ‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’ were close to ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ in flowering and maturity dates and plant height. However, ‘Toiku-B79’ had significantly more pods and ‘Toiku-B80’ had higher 100-seed weight than ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ in both Memuro and Kunneppu. The yields of the NILs were 4%–5% higher in Memuro and 21%–23% higher in Kunneppu than those of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’.

Table 3.

SbDV-YS resistance of Sdvy-1-NILs

Cultivar % Symptomatic plants
Toiku-B79 0.0 (n = 26)
Toiku-B80 0.0 (n = 23)
Taisho-Kintoki 76.9 (n = 26)
Open in a new tab

Plants were inoculated with SbDV-YS before planting in the field.

Table 4.

Agronomic traits of Sdvy-1-NILs

Location Cultivar Flowering date Maturity date Plant height (cm) No. of pods (per plant) 100-seed weight (g) Yield (kg/1000 m2)a % Symptomatic plants
Memuro Toiku-B79 14-Jul 12-Sep 53.5 18.5** 71.8 312 (104) 0.0
Toiku-B80 14-Jul 12-Sep 57.0 17.4 75.0* 313 (105) 0.0
Taisho-Kintoki 14-Jul 11-Sep 53.0 16.3 72.8 299 (100) 0.2
Kunneppu Toiku-B79 11-Jul 10-Sep 49.0 22.1** 77.8 403 (123)* 0.0**
Toiku-B80 11-Jul 10-Sep 50.0 19.3 80.2 398 (121)* 0.0**
Taisho-Kintoki 10-Jul 9-Sep 50.0 19.6 77.2 328 (100) 7.3
Open in a new tab

Asterisks indicate significant differences from ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ by Dunnett’s test at *5%, **1%.

a

Numbers in parentheses are % yields relative to ‘Taisho-Kintoki’.

Seed appearance and boiled bean quality of Sdvy-1-NILs

‘Toiku-B79’ had similar seed dimensions to those of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’, whereas ‘Toiku-B80’ had longer, wider, thicker seeds, but in the same proportions as those of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ (Table 5, Fig. 1). The seed coat color of the raw NIL beans was close to that of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ beans, except that the NIL beans had higher L* values (Table 6, Fig. 1). The L*, a* and b* values of the boiled NIL beans were not significantly different from those of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ beans. The hardness of the whole seed and of the seed coat was not significantly different between the NILs and ‘Taisho-Kintoki’. However, 24.7–27.7% of the Sdvy-1-NILs had a cracked seed coat after boiling, versus 8.7% of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ (Table 6).

Table 5.

Seed size and shape of Sdvy-1-NILs

Cultivar Length (mm, L) Width (mm, W) Thickness (mm, T) L/W W/T
Toiku-B79 14.66 9.41 7.40 1.56 1.27
Toiku-B80 15.20** 9.69** 7.61** 1.57 1.27
Taisho-Kintoki 14.60 9.32 7.31 1.57 1.27
Open in a new tab

Asterisks indicate significant differences from ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ by Dunnett’s test at **1%.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Seed appearance of Sdvy-1-NILs ‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’ and their parents ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ (recurrent parent) and ‘Oofuku’ (Sdvy-1 donor).

Table 6.

Boiled bean quality of Sdvy-1-NILs

Cultivar Seed coat color Hardness (g) Seed coat cracking (%)
Raw Boiled
L* a* b* L* a* b* Whole seed Seed coat
Toiku-B79 29.3* 19.2 4.6 49.0 9.3 9.9 3249.0 113.2 24.7**
Toiku-B80 29.6* 20.0 4.9 49.5 7.5 9.2 3155.0 99.5 27.7**
Taisho-Kintoki 28.1 19.4 5.0 49.5 8.4 9.5 3497.0 105.9 8.7
Open in a new tab

Asterisks indicate significant differences from ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ by Dunnett’s test at *5%, **1%.

Discussion

As it was unclear which marker was the most closely linked to Sdvy-1, we used three markers to introduce Sdvy-1 into ‘Taisho-Kintoki’. The Sdvy-1-NILs with the ‘Oofuku’ genotype at DV86 had a wide range of seed coat colors, including black, tan, pale tan, purple, and mottled. ‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’, which were selected for their red-purple seed coat, possessed the ‘Oofuku’ genotype at DV386 and DV398 but not at DV86 (Table 2). Several molecular markers linked to genes controlling seed coat color and pattern have been mapped (Kyle and Dickson 1988, McClean et al. 2002). We speculate that one of those genes is closely linked to Sdvy-1 and is located closer to DV86 than DV386 and DV398.

‘Toiku-B79’ and ‘Toiku-B80’ were similar to ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ in most of the agronomic traits, except a greater number of pods in ‘Toiku-B79’ and higher 100-seed weight in ‘Toiku-B80’, which may have greatly contributed to the higher yields than in ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ in Memuro, where the incidence of SbDV-YS was low (Table 4). ‘Toiku-B80’ had larger seeds, in agreement with its higher 100-seed weight (Table 5).

The inoculation test revealed that Sdvy-1 is necessary and sufficient for SbDV-YS resistance (Table 3). Because infected plants suffer yield loss, the SbDV-YS resistance explains most of the significantly higher yields of the NILs than of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ in Kunneppu, where the incidence of SbDV-YS was high (Table 4). These findings support our contention that the SCAR markers DV386 and DV398 are useful for breeding SbDV-YS-resistant common bean. Of the two, DV386 is particularly favorable because of its ability to distinguish heterozygous genotypes from homozygous resistant ones (Table 1).

The coat color of the raw Sdvy-1-NIL seeds had higher L* values than that of ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ (Table 6), but similar to that of ‘Fukumasari’, another elite ‘Kintoki’-brand cultivar (data not shown). The boiled NIL seeds had significantly more seed coat cracking than ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ (Table 6). Because seed coat cracking greatly lowers the cooking quality, neither NIL was registered as a cultivar, despite their similarity to ‘Taisho-Kintoki’ in other aspects of seed appearance and eating quality. Further study is required to elucidate whether seed coat cracking is linked to Sdvy-1.

Rsdv1 is a major soybean gene controlling SbDV resistance derived from the Indonesian cultivar ‘Wilis’ (Tazawa et al. 2008, Uchibori et al. 2009, Yamashita et al. 2013). Although SbDV-YS does not infect common bean carrying Sdvy-1, it infects soybean carrying Rsdv1 although the symptoms develop slowly and are mild (Tazawa et al. 2008). Despite this difference, Rsdv1 shares common characteristics with Sdvy-1: both are major single loci conferring SbDV resistance and are not recessively inherited; i.e., plants carrying Sdvy-1 or Rsdv1 are fully or partially resistant to SbDV. We hypothesize that Sdvy-1 and Rsdv1 are homologs and play similar roles in SbDV resistance. This hypothesis can be tested in further research using the genomic sequence database of both soybean and common bean (http://www.phytozome.net) and the results of synteny studies (McClean et al. 2010).

Genes controlling gene-for-gene resistance in plants encode proteins with distinct motifs such as nucleotide-binding sites (NBS) and leucine-rich repeats (LRR). In common bean, several disease resistance genes encode NBS-LRR motifs. Such genes include the I locus for resistance to Bean common mosaic virus, Bean common mosaic necrosis virus and several other viruses, and the Co-2 locus for anthracnose resistance (Creusot et al. 1999, Vallejos et al. 2006). Further research is necessary to establish whether Sdvy-1 is one of the more than 400 NBS resistance genes in the common bean genome (Garzón et al. 2013).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Japan Beans Fund Association.

Literature Cited

  1. Abraham, A.D., Menzel, W., Vetten, H.J. and Saucke, H. (2007) First report of Soybean dwarf virus (genus Luteovirus) infecting faba bean and clover in Germany. Plant Dis. 91: 1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Creusot, F., Macadré, C., Cana, E.F., Riou, C., Geffroy, V., Sévignac, M., Dron, M. and Langin, T. (1999) Cloning and molecular characterization of three members of the NBS-LRR subfamily located in the vicinity of the Co-2 locus for anthracnose resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genome 42: 254–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ebe, S., Sasaki, J. and Onodera, K. (2002) Breeding for soybean dwarf virus resistance in kidney beans. Breed. Res. 4: 285. [Google Scholar]
  4. Garzón, L.N., Oliveros, O.A., Rosen, B., Ligarreto, G.A., Cook, D.R. and Blair, M.W. (2013) Isolation and characterization of nucleotide-binding site resistance gene homologues in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Phytopathology 103: 156–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnstone, G.R. and McLean, G.D. (1987) Virus diseases of subterranean clover. Ann. Appl. Biol. 110: 421–440. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kyle, M.M. and Dickson, M.H. (1988) Linkage of hypersensitivity to five viruses with the B locus in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Hered. 79: 308–311. [Google Scholar]
  7. McClean, P.E., Lee, R.K., Otto, C., Gepts, P. and Bassett, M.J. (2002) Molecular and phenotypic mapping of genes controlling seed coat pattern and color in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Hered. 93: 148–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McClean, P.E., Mamidi, S., McConnell, M., Chikara, S. and Lee, R. (2010) Synteny mapping between common bean and soybean reveals extensive blocks of shared loci. BMC genomics 11: 184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mikoshiba, Y. and Honda, K. (2000) Detection of Soybean dwarf virus in aphids by TAS-ELISA using monoclonal antibodies. Ann. Rept. Plant Prot. North Japan 51: 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mizukoshi, T., Hanada, T. and Hashimoto, Y. (1991) Period of infection of bean yellows in kidney beans by the foxglove aphid, Aulacorthum solani Kaletenbach, in the Tokachi district, Hokkaido. Ann. Rept. Plant Prot. North Japan 42: 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mizukoshi, T., Hashimoto, Y. and Hanada, T. (1992) Inhibitive effect of silver polyethylene film on Soybean dwarf virus infection and economical treatment in kidney beans. Ann. Rept. Plant Prot. North Japan 43: 63–65. [Google Scholar]
  12. Najar, A., Kumari, S.G., Makkouk, K.M. and Daaloul, A. (2003) A survey of viruses affecting faba bean (Vicia faba) in Tunisia includes first record of Soybean dwarf virus. Plant Dis. 87: 1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ochman, H., Gerber, A.S. and Hartl, D.L. (1988) Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics 120: 621–623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Onodera, K. and Ebe, S. (2003) Inoculation method of screening kidney bean varieties for resistance to bean yellows, Soybean dwarf virus (SbDV). Bull. Hokkaido Prefect. Agric. Exp. Stn. 84: 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  15. Suzuki, T., Sato, M. and Takeuchi, T. (2012) Evaluation of the effects of five QTL regions on Fusarium head blight resistance and agronomic traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Breed. Sci. 62: 11–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Suzuki, T., Yoshii, T., Fujita, S., Shimada, H., Takeuchi, T. and Kondo, N. (2013) DNA markers linked to Pga1, an adzuki bean gene that confers resistance to Cadophora gregata race 1. Breed. Sci. 63: 353–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tadesse, N., Ali, K., Gorfu, D., Abraham, A., Lencho, A., Ayalew, M., Yusuf, A., Makkouk, K.M. and Kumari, S.G. (1999) First report of Soybean dwarf virus infecting lentil and beet western yellows virus infecting lentil and chickpea crops in Ethiopia. Plant Dis. 83: 589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamada, T. (1973) Strains of Soybean dwarf virus. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Japan 39: 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamada, T. (1975) Studies on the soybean dwarf disease. Rep. Hokkaido Prefect. Agric. Exp. Stn. 25: 1–125. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tamada, T., Goto, T., Chiba, I. and Suwa, T. (1969) Soybean dwarf, a new virus disease. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Japan 35: 282–285. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tazawa, A., Jinno, H., Tezuka, M., Miyoshi, T., Kosaka, F. and Tanaka, Y. (2008) Development of soybean breeding line Shoku-kei 32 with high resistance to Soybean dwarf virus disease derived from “Wilis”. Bull. Hokkaido Prefect. Agric. Exp. Stn. 92: 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  22. Uchibori, A., Sasaki, J., Takeuchi, T., Kamiya, M., Tazawa, A., Inukai, T. and Masuta, C. (2009) QTL analysis for resistance to Soybean dwarf virus in Indonesian soybean cultivar Wilis. Mol. Breed. 23: 323–328. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vallejos, C.E., Astua-Monge, G., Jones, V., Plyler, T.R., Sakiyama, N.S. and Mackenzie, S.A. (2006) Genetic and molecular characterization of the I locus of Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 172: 1229–1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M.et al. (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407–4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson, J. and Close, R.C. (1973) Subterranean clover red leaf virus and other legume viruses in Canterbury. N. Z. J. of Agric. Res. 16: 305–310. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yamashita, Y., Takeuchi, T., Ohnishi, S., Sasaki, J. and Tazawa, A. (2013) Fine mapping of the major Soybean dwarf virus resistance gene Rsdv1 of the soybean cultivar ‘Wilis’. Breed. Sci. 63: 417–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Breeding Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Breeding

RESOURCES