Skip to main content
Dose-Response logoLink to Dose-Response
. 2014 Oct 30;12(4):522–524. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.14-054.LeBourg

Hormesis and Trade-Offs: A Comment

Éric Le Bourg 1,, Suresh I S Rattan 2
PMCID: PMC4267446  PMID: 25552954

Single or multiple exposures to mild stress at younger ages often have positive health beneficial effects throughout life, indicating that rescue systems turned on at a young age can be effective even in old age (e.g. Le Bourg 2011). This seems to be at variance with the notion of the so-called trade-offs that due to a limitation of resources it is impossible for an organism to increase all aspects of fitness (see for example, Stearns 2000). Recently, this view has again been raised in an article by McClure et al. (2014), published in Evolution. These authors have reported that Drosophila melanogaster flies challenged by a pretreatment with dead spores of the fungus Metarhizium robertsii lived longer, survived better under heat stress, and had a higher fecundity. Thus, these flies displayed the well-established phenomenon of physiological hormesis (for hormesis terminology, see for example Calabrese et al. 2007; Wiegant 2014). However, McClure et al. (2014) also showed that the pretreatment by dead fungal spores decreased by 10% the survival time of the flies after infection by live spores of the same fungus, and concluded that “when it occurs, hormesis leads to trade-offs with other fitness traits” and that, if applied to human patients, “the consequences of hormetic treatments for infected patients could be dire”. Thus, the balance of positive and negative effects of hormesis on fitness traits could be definitely on the negative side, precluding relying on hormesis in therapy or health maintenance and improvement.

In our opinion, this viewpoint is not completely accurate because several other studies performed with flies and other systems show that a mild stress can have positive, negative or no effects on fitness-related traits. For instance, Lints and Le Bourg (1989) showed that female D. melanogaster flies living continuously in hypergravity had a lower and delayed peak of egg-laying, but the total fecundity remained roughly the same. Similarly, Hercus et al. (2003) showed that four rounds of exposure to mild heat stress, which increased the average and maximum lifespan of D. melanogaster and their resistance to heat, slightly reduced egg-laying (about 5%). Growing in hypergravity or having parents living in hypergravity slightly decreased viability of the larvae (Le Bourg and Lints 1989) but, by contrast, living in hypergravity for two weeks, a treatment known to increase longevity of males and resistance to heat in both sexes, had no effect on the number of females inseminated by males (Le Bourg, unpublished results). Regarding resistance to infection by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana, two mild stresses had no effect on post-infection lifespan (hypergravity and heat, Le Bourg et al. 2009), while a pretreatment by cold increased survival in males and had no clear effect in females (e.g. Le Bourg et al. 2009), the result of males being opposite to that of McClure et al. (2014) on immunity.

Therefore, these results on traits linked to fitness in a direct (fecundity and viability) or in an indirect way (survival to fungal infection, possibly encountered in the wild) show that mild stresses can have either positive, slightly negative or no effects on these traits. The negative effects, using dead spores of a fungus as a mild stress, reported by McClure et al. (2014), do not pose a serious challenge to the application of hormesis for human health and longevity. However, by pointing out the possible interactive, counteractive or synergistic effects of hormetic interventions, these authors surely address an important aspect of physiological hormesis.

Indeed, not all mild stresses increase lifespan and resistance to severe stresses (Lagisz et al. 2013), because the effects on longevity can be sex-specific and mild stresses can decrease resistance to starvation (Le Bourg 2009). Therefore, using hormesis as a possible therapy or a preventive strategy requires, as for any new therapy, testing whether any deleterious consequences of the pretreatment do exist. To give an example in mammals, subjecting a pig to a pretreatment with 250 ppm of carbon monoxide (1000 ppm is lethal) before cardiopulmonary bypass decreases the number of defibrillations necessary to restart the heart (2 vs 6) and prevents cardiac edema (Lavitrano et al. 2004). Obviously, it is necessary to rule out possible deleterious effects of this pretreatment before routinely using it in human cardiac surgery. Other studies have shown that mild stress can mitigate the effects of cardiac and cerebral ischemia (reviews in Simm and Horstkorte 2014; Béjot and Garnier 2014).

Since a wide variety of mild stresses, including exercise, have been shown to have health beneficial hormetic effects in various species, including mammals, there is a definitive hope that new strategies relying on hormetic effects could be used either as preventive or as therapeutic in human beings (reviews in Rattan and Le Bourg 2014, but see also, Pardon 2010; Sørensen et al. 2010). It seems that the balance between positive and possible negative effects of mild stress is clearly on the positive side, and any trade-offs in fitness are specific to the general health, robustness and resilience of the body.

REFERENCES

  1. Béjot Y, Garnier P. Cerebral ischemia. In: Rattan SIS, Le Bourg E, editors. Hormesis in health and disease. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2014. pp. 185–200. [Google Scholar]
  2. Calabrese EJ, Bachmann KA, Bailer AJ, Bolger PM, Borak J, Cai L, Cedergreen N, Cherian MG, Chiueh CC, Clarkson TW, Cook RR, Diamond DM, Doolittle DJ, Dorato MA, Duke SO, Feinendegen L, Gardner DE, Hart RW, Hastings KL, Hayes AW, Hoffmann GR, Ives JA, Jaworowski Z, Johnson TE, Jonas WB, Kaminski NE, Keller JG, Klaunig JE, Knudsen TB, Kozumbo WJ, Lettieri T, Liu SZ, Maisseu A, Maynard KI, Masoro EJ, McClellan RO, Mehendale HM, Mothersill C, Newlin DB, Nigg HN, Oehme FW, Phalen RF, Philbert MA, Rattan SI, Riviere JE, Rodricks J, Sapolsky RM, Scott BR, Seymour C, Sinclair DA, Smith-Sonneborn J, Snow ET, Spear L, Stevenson DE, Thomas Y, Tubiana M, Williams GM, Mattson MP. Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hercus MJ, Loeschcke V, Rattan SIS. Lifespan extension of Drosophila melanogaster through hormesis by repeated mild heat stress. Biogerontology. 2003;4:149–156. doi: 10.1023/a:1024197806855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lagisz M, Hector KL, Nakagawa S. Life extension after heat shock exposure: Assessing meta-analytic evidence for hormesis. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:653–660. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lavitrano M, Smolenski RT, Musumeci A, Maccherini M, Slominska E, Di Florio E, Bracco A, Mancini A, Stassi G, Patti M, Giovannoni R, Froio A, Simeone F, Forni M, Bacci ML, D’Alise G, Cozzi E, Otterbein LE, Yacoub MH, Bach FH, Calise F. Carbon monoxide improves cardiac energetics and safeguards the heart during reperfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass in pigs. FASEB J. 2004;18:1093–1095. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0996fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Bourg E. Hormesis, aging, and longevity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790:1030–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Le Bourg E. A cold stress applied at various ages can increase resistance to heat and fungal infection in aged Drosophila melanogaster flies. Biogerontology. 2011;12:185–193. doi: 10.1007/s10522-010-9309-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Bourg E, Lints FA. Hypergravity and ageing in Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Viability. Gerontology. 1989;35:253–259. doi: 10.1159/000213034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Le Bourg E, Massou I, Gobert V. Cold stress increases resistance to fungal infection throughout life in Drosophila melanogaster. Biogerontology. 2009;10:613–625. doi: 10.1007/s10522-008-9206-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lints FA, Le Bourg E. Hypergravity and ageing in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Fecundity. Gerontology. 1989;35:235–243. doi: 10.1159/000213032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McClure CD, Zhong W, Hunt VL, Chapman FM, Hill FV, Priest NK. Hormesis results in trade-offs with immunity. Evolution. 2014;68:2225–2233. doi: 10.1111/evo.12453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pardon MC. Hormesis is applicable as a pro-healthy aging intervention in mammals and human beings. Dose-Response. 2010;8:22–27. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-020.Pardon. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rattan SIS, Le Bourg E, editors. Hormesis in health and disease. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. Simm A, Horstkorte R. Cardiac ischemic preconditioning and the ischemia/reperfusion injury. In: Rattan SIS, Le Bourg E, editors. Hormesis in health and disease. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2014. pp. 167–183. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sørensen JG, Holmstrup M, Sarup P, Loeschcke V. Evolutionary theory and studies of model organisms predict a cautiously positive perspective on the therapeutic use of hormesis for healthy aging in humans. Dose-Response. 2010;8:53–57. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-040.Sorensen. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stearns SC. Life history evolution: successes, limitations, and prospects. Naturwissenschaften. 2000;87:476–486. doi: 10.1007/s001140050763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wiegant FAC. Pre- and postconditioning hormesis. In: Rattan SIS, Le Bourg E, editors. Hormesis in health and disease. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2014. pp. 13–33. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dose-Response are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES