Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1972 Aug;69(8):2258–2262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.8.2258

Simultaneous Determination of Viscosity and Density of Protein Solutions by Magnetic Suspension

D W Kupke 1, M G Hodgins *, J W Beams *
PMCID: PMC426913  PMID: 4506095

Abstract

The first results are reported with a magnetic suspension instrument for determination of the viscosity and density concurrently on small volumes (0.2 ml) of protein solution. Reasonable agreement was obtained with literature values for the intrinsic viscosities and specific volumes (partial or isopotential) of serum albumin and ribonuclease in native solvents, and in 6 M guanidinium chloride with or without 2-mercaptoethanol. Turnip Yellow Mosaic virus and myosin were also studied, the results with the virus being related to hydration and structure data and those with myosin to the dissociative character of the protein. The possibility of using this approach to follow the time course of viscosity and density changes during reactions is shown.

Keywords: intrinsic viscosity, specific volumes, virus, hydration

Full text

PDF
2258

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beams J. W. Magnetic suspension densimeter. Rev Sci Instrum. 1969 Jan;40(1):167–168. doi: 10.1063/1.1683718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke M., Harrington W. F. Geometry of the myosin dimer. Nature. 1971 Sep 10;233(5315):140–142. doi: 10.1038/233140a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castellino F. J., Barker R. Examination of the dissociation of multichain proteins in guanidine hydrochloride by membrane osmometry. Biochemistry. 1968 Jun;7(6):2207–2217. doi: 10.1021/bi00846a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DUNN D. B., HITCHBORN J. H. THE USE OF BENTONITE IN THE PURIFICATION OF PLANT VIRUSES. Virology. 1965 Feb;25:171–192. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fahey P. F., Kupke D. W., Beams J. W. Effect of pressure on the apparent specific volume of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Jun;63(2):548–555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.2.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilli S. J., Thompson D. S. A rotating cartesian-diver viscometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Mar;57(3):562–566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.3.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodrich R., Swinehart D. F., Kelly M. J., Reithel F. J. A transistor-controlled magnetic densitometer designed for small sample volumes. Anal Biochem. 1969 Apr 4;28(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(69)90153-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris M., Suelter C. H. A simple chromatographic procedure for the preparation of rabbit-muscle myosin A free from AMP deaminase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 Apr 11;133(3):393–398. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(67)90543-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Klug A., Longley W., Leberman R. Arrangement of protein subunits and the distribution of nucleic acid in turnip yellow mosaic virus. I. X-ray diffraction studies. J Mol Biol. 1966 Jan;15(1):315–343. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kupke D. W. Volume changes by magnetic densitometry. Fed Proc. 1966 May-Jun;25(3):990–992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LAUFFER M. A., BENDET I. J. The hydration of viruses. Adv Virus Res. 1954;2:241–287. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60534-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MAGDOFF B. S. Sub-units in southern bean mosaic virus. Nature. 1960 Mar 5;185:673–674. doi: 10.1038/185673a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mozersky S. M., Pettinati J. D., Kolman S. D. Analytical chromatography of myosin on hydroxyapatite. J Chromatogr. 1972 Feb 23;65(2):387–396. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)92561-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nikkel H. J., Foster J. F. A reversible sulfhydryl-catalyzed structural alteraction of bovine mercaptalbumin. Biochemistry. 1971 Nov 23;10(24):4479–4486. doi: 10.1021/bi00800a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Senter J. P. Magnetic densimeter utilizing optical sensing. Rev Sci Instrum. 1969 Feb;40(2):334–338. doi: 10.1063/1.1683931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ULRICH D. V., KUPKE D. W., BEAMS J. W. AN IMPROVED MAGNETIC DENSITOMETER: THE PARTIAL SPECIFIC VOLUME OF RIBONUCLEASE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Aug;52:349–356. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.2.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zimm B. H., Crothers D. M. SIMPLIFIED ROTATING CYLINDER VISCOMETER FOR DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Jun;48(6):905–911. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.6.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES