Skip to main content
European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology logoLink to European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology
. 2014 Dec 16;4(4):177–183. doi: 10.1556/EUJMI-D-14-00032

Diagnosis of pertussis using nasopharyngeal IgA and polymerase chain reaction in specimens from outpatients in Australia

Miles H Beaman 1,2,3,1,2,3,*, Mahdad Karimi 4,1, Meredith Hodge 5,1, Anthony D Keil 6,4, Peter Campbell 7,4
PMCID: PMC4271813  PMID: 25544889

Abstract

We assessed IgA antibodies and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of pertussis in nasopharyngeal aspiration (NPA) samples from outpatients in Australia.

  A total of 1700 patients (849 adults, 851 children) from Western Australia and the Northern Territory fulfilled the laboratory case definition for pertussis between 2004 and 2013: 732 specimens were positive by NPA IgA alone, 559 by PCR alone, and 409 by both tests. Overall, 968 cases (56.8%) were positive by PCR and 1141 cases (67.2%) by IgA [p < 0.00025]. Among pediatric patients, PCR was positive in 524 (61.3%) and IgA in 569 (67%). In 849 adult cases, the respective proportions were 52.3% and 67.4% [p < 0.00025].

  The duration of cough in 507 patients was shorter in 262 pediatric cases (mean, 2.51 weeks; standard deviation [SD], 2.25) than 245 adult patients (3.27 weeks; SD, 2.79) [p = 0.0009]. PCR positivity showed a season-dependent variance (range, 5.6 to 85.9%) and peaked in the second week (71.7%) of illness. IgA antibodies peaked in the fifth week (89.5%) postinfection, and the positivity rate for NPA IgA was less variable (range, 38.3–97.2%).

  Nasopharyngeal Bordetella pertussis-specific IgA antibodies are valuable in diagnosis of pertussis in Australia. Reliance on PCR alone misses a significant proportion of pertussis cases, especially those with a delayed presentation.

Keywords: IgA, nasopharyngeal aspirate, PCR, pertussis, serology

Introduction

Pertussis is vaccine-preventable, but cases of this potentially serious disease continue to occur worldwide, partly because of waning vaccine-derived immunity in adults [14].

The diagnosis of pertussis may be by clinical or diagnostic criteria, but diagnostic techniques have generally been evaluated during single outbreaks or as part of vaccine licensing trials. Few papers report the role of these techniques in routine diagnostic laboratories under field conditions, especially over multiple seasons. Classical bacteriological techniques such as culture are known to be insensitive in the diagnosis of pertussis infection [5] partly because of the fastidiousness of the organism and delays in specimen transport to the laboratory. Mucosal Bordetella pertussis-specific IgA serology performed on samples obtained by nasopharyngeal aspiration (NPA) [6, 7] has long been demonstrated to be useful in the diagnosis of cases of pertussis but is not widely used in most jurisdictions. NPA IgA assays have been in routine use in one of our institutions for over 20 years [8], and specimens are easily collected in an outpatient setting with little patient discomfort. More recently, PCR testing using a number of protocols [9, 10] has also been shown to have a role in diagnosing acute cases, with a number of caveats. For example, B. pertussis nucleic acid is generally PCR-detectable only in the first 3 weeks of illness, and patients presenting later often have a negative result [11]. In addition, an over-reliance on PCR testing alone may result in false-positive diagnoses as highlighted by several recent reports of pseudo-outbreaks [12, 13]. Hence, the precise role that each testing modality has in diagnosis of pertussis is not fully resolved, particularly in a vaccinated community setting.

Jurisdictions monitor the incidence of infectious disease, such as pertussis, by notification systems. Wide variations in incidence may occur because of differing methodology in various jurisdictions, including diagnostic techniques [4]. The method of diagnosis is rarely available in reports of disease incidence, however, including for pertussis. Australia, despite having an active immunisation program with national coverage rates of up to 92% by 15 months of age, continues to suffer epidemics of pertussis. Western Australia had explosive epidemics in 2004 and 2011/2 [14], and the most recent major outbreak in the Northern Territory was in 2008 [15]. One of our laboratories (Western Diagnostic Pathology, WDP) services both of these jurisdictions, which cover areas of 2.5 and 1.3 million square kilometres with populations of 2.3 and 0.23 million, respectively. We used the Australian national case definition for laboratory diagnosis of pertussis [16] (i.e., positive culture or PCR test, seroconversion or significant increase in antibody level, or single-titre positive whole cell IgA serology [peripheral or NPA]) to study the relative contribution of B. pertussis-specific IgA and PCR testing of NPA specimens in diagnosis of laboratory-notified community cases of pertussis in Western Australia and the Northern Territory over 10 completed calendar years (2004–13).

Materials and methods

NPA specimens from patients clinically suspected of acute pertussis infection were collected in the community by WDP staff and were assayed there or at Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (PMH) for B. pertussis-specific IgA and by real-time PCR. Data were respectively collated by computer searching for specimens received between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2012 at WDP. The Australian national case definition used for incident pertussis cases in this study was detectable mucosal B. pertussis-specific IgA antibody and/or positive B. pertussis PCR [16]. Hence, according to this definition, PCR+/IgA+, PCR+/IgA-, PCR+/IgA equivocal, and PCR−/IgA+ cases fulfilled these criteria. PCR−, IgA equivocal, and PCR−/IgA− cases were excluded. Evidence of a clinically compatible illness (prolonged coughing including paroxysms, post-tussive whooping, and/or vomiting) and/or contact with a proven case was sought from information provided on the laboratory request form, but not used to classify cases.

This was not designed to be a study of clinically notified pertussis, but cases which had sufficient clinical information on their request forms to fulfil the Australian national clinical case definition for pertussis [20] were recorded for subanalysis. These criteria include close contact with a proven case, >2 weeks cough illness, cough paroxysms, post-tussive vomiting, or post-tussive whooping.

Specimen collection and processing

NPAs were collected from patients with suspected pertussis into sterile collection tubes. Aspirated NP fluid was collected into 0.5 ml sterile saline. An equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added to the aspirate in the laboratory with vigorous vortexing. Aliquots of this suspension were subsequently used for detection of specific nasal IgA antibodies directed against B. pertussis via an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using a whole cell sonicate of B. pertussis as the antigen, and detection of B. pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis DNA via PCR.

Detection of NPA IgA anti-B. pertussis antibodies

Identical protocols were used in both laboratories (WDP and PMH), and results from the former were originally validated in parallel with the latter laboratory. A 100 μl aliquot of the NPA specimen/PBS suspension was analyzed using a commercial anti-B. pertussis IgA detection kit with whole cell B. pertussis sonicate as antigen (Panbio B. pertussis IgA kit E-BPB01A, Panbio Ltd., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia). Resulting assay optical densities were converted to Panbio Units (specimen/control × 10) with results <9 being reported as negative, 9–19 as equivocal, and >19 as positive. This methodology for NPA specimens had been previously validated [17] against a published in-house NPA IgA anti-B. pertussis assay using whole cell sonicates [8].

Detection of B. pertussis/B. parapertussis DNA by PCR

Identical target sequences and protocols were used in both laboratories (WDP and PMH), and results from the former were originally validated in parallel with the latter laboratory. Following automated DNA extraction from NPA/PBS aliquots (MagNA Pure LC, Roche Applied Science), real-time amplification and detection of insertion sequences IS 481 (a multicopy gene which provides high sensitivity) of B. pertussis and IS1001 of B. parapertussis were performed using specific primers and fluorescent Taqman probes as previously described [17, 18]. Negative control for assay runs was PCR-grade water, and positive control was DNA extracted from local clinical isolates of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis. IS 481 is also present in some strains of Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella bronchiseptica, and PCR assays are reported with this disclaimer, although, in our experience during the study period, these species are rarely seen (80 clinical isolates of B. pertussis were obtained from specimens, and only one other specimen had another species present, B. bronchiseptica, which was actually negative in our IS 481 assay).

Statistical analysis

Proportions from different groups were compared by Fisher’s exact test. Group data were compared by unpaired t‑test [19].

Results

Over the span of 10 years, 14,135 NPA samples were tested and 2559 specimens were positive for B. pertussis DNA by PCR and/or had detectable titres for B. pertussis-specific NPA WC-IgA by EIA. Twenty-five samples had B. parapertussis DNA detected by PCR but were not included in the cohort as parapertussis is not notifiable in Australia.

Of the 2559 cases mentioned above, 1700 unique patients fulfilled the strict laboratory case-definition for incident pertussis. An amount of 859 IgA-equivocal PCR-negative cases were excluded as they did not satisfy the national case definition, but IgA-equivocal PCR-positive cases were included as they did fulfil these criteria. Fifty-three cases were from the Northern Territory, and 1647 were from Western Australia. Overall, 926 (54.5%) patients were female, and 774 (45.5%) were male. The mean age was 23.9 years (SD, 20.9; range, 1 week–82 years). The mean age for males was lower (21.4 years; SD, 19.7; range, 1 day–82 years) than for females (26 years; SD, 21.7; range, 1 day–81 years) [p < 0.001 by unpaired t-test]. A total of 851 cases (50.1%) were 14 years or younger (mean age for children 7.22 years; SD, 4.18) and classified as pediatric cases, and 849 cases were above 14 years and categorized as adults (mean age, 40.67 years; SD, 17.32). Of the pediatric group and the adult group, 437 (51.4%) and 491 (57.8%), respectively, were female.

A total of 732 specimens were positive by NPA IgA EIA alone, 559 by PCR alone, and 409 by both tests (261 positive and 148 equivocal for NPA IgA) (Table 1).

Table 1.

PCR and NPA IgA results in laboratory-defined cases

PCR positive PCR negative Total
IgA positive 261 732 993
IgA equivocal 148 (859) 148
IgA negative 559 0 559

Total 968 736 1700

( ) Cases excluded

Agreement overall was lower for PCR (89.5) than for IgA (91.9) [proportions statistically different by Fisher’s exact test; Chi square, 847.22; p < 0.00025].

Positive agreement was lower for PCR (56.8) than for IgA (67.2) [proportions statistically different by Fisher’s exact test; Chi square, 57.95; p < 0.00025].

Negative agreement was lower for PCR (94.0) than for IgA (95.4) [proportions statistically different by Fisher’s exact test; Chi square, 21.96; p < 0.00025].

PCR was positive in 524 (61.3%) and NPA IgA detectable in 569 (67%) of the pediatric group. In contrast, in the adult group, the relative percentages were 52.3% (444 cases) and 67.4% (572) [proportions for PCR positivity in each age group statistically different by Fisher’s exact test; Chi square, 29.84; p < 0.00025].

The duration of cough was recorded for 507 patients (mean of 2.88 weeks; SD, 2.55). The mean duration was shorter in 262 pediatric (2.51 weeks; SD, 2.25) than 245 adult patients (3.27 weeks; SD, 2.79) [p = 0.0009 by unpaired t-test]. A total of 294 PCR-positive patients had a shorter cough duration reported (mean of 2.31 weeks; SD, 2.55) than the 213 patients with detectable NPA IgA (mean of 3.56 weeks; SD, 2.93) [p = 0.0001 by unpaired t-test]. The prevalence of a positive PCR result peaked in the second week of illness and progressively fell with each succeeding week, with the last positive result recorded in a patient with 12 weeks of symptoms (Table 3). The prevalence of a positive NPA IgA result peaked in the fifth week and slowly fell but remained high in each succeeding week, with the latest positive result recorded in a patient 26 weeks after the onset of cough. The proportion of cases with a positive PCR result (67.9%) was higher than those with a positive NPA IgA result (59%) in the first week (Table 3; Fisher’s exact test; Chi square, 15.15; p < 0.0005), was not different in the second week, and thereafter was statistically lower than NPA IgA in each subsequent week (Table 3).

Table 3.

Effect of duration of cough on PCR and NPA IgA positivity

Week of cough n PCR detected (%) NPA IgA detected (%) p value
1 112 76 (67.9) 59 (52.7) <0.0005
2 138 99 (71.7) 83 (60.1) 0.1–0.2
3 98 54 (55.1) 68 (69.4) <0.0001
4 58 25 (43.1) 47 (81) <0.0005
5 19  4 (21.1) 17 (89.5) <0.0005
6 15  5 (33.3) 12 (80) <0.0005
7–26 29  9 (31) 23 (79.3) <0.005

The positivity rate for different NPA tests fluctuated markedly in different seasons (Table 4). For PCR in particular, the rate ranged from a low of 5.6% in 2006 to a high of 85.9% in 2010. The rate for NPA IgA was more stable (range 38.3–97.4%) and was only lower than the PCR rate in 3 years (2008, 2009, and 2010). The PCR positive rate was highest in epidemic years (2004 and 2011) at 62.5% and was statistically higher than in interepidemic years (51.3%; Chi square, 18.51; p < 0.0005). The positivity rate for NPA IgA did not alter significantly between epidemic and interepidemic years (68.0% vs. 65.2%, respectively; Chi square, 1.69; p < 0.2 > 0.1).

Table 4.

Percentage positivity of NPA IgA and PCR in different years

Year N % PCR positive
(N)
% IgA detected
(N)
Cough duration, weeks (mean, SD)
2004 357 68.9 (246) 70.3 (251) 3.29 (2.96)
2005 133 30.8 (41) 88.7 (118) 4.67 (3.11)
2006 107  5.6 (6) 97.2 (104) 4.07 (3.06)
2007 19 26.3 (5) 84.2 (16) 10.67 (13.32)
2008 51 68.6 (35) 58.8 (30) 2.66 (1.98)
2009 79 68.4 (54) 39.2 (31) 2.77 (1.99)
2010 128 85.9 (110) 38.3 (49) 2.88 (2.43)
2011 430 57.2 (246) 66.3 (284) 2.50 (1.78)
2012 314 52.5 (165) 63.4 (197) 2.38 (1.42)
2013 96 62.5 (60) 62.5 (59) 2.63(1.48)

Although this was not designed as a study of clinically notified pertussis, 779 cases had sufficient clinical information on their request forms to fulfil the Australian national clinical case definition for pertussis [20], including close contact with a proven case (371 cases, 47.6%), >2 weeks cough illness (352 cases, 45.2%), cough paroxysms (121 cases, 15.5%), post-tussive vomiting (78 cases, 10.0%), or post-tussive whooping (15 cases, 1.9%). The remaining cases had either no clinical details submitted (517 cases) or insufficiently precise information (404 cases) to determine their clinical status: including “whooping cough,” “pertussis,” “bronchitis,” “tracheitis,” “bronchiolitis,” “cough,” “dry cough,” “chronic cough,” or “unrelenting cough” which were not inconsistent with the diagnosis.

For the cases fulfilling the clinical case definition, 300 specimens were positive by NPA IgA assay alone, 272 by PCR alone, and 211 by both tests (134 positive and 75 equivocal for NPA IgA) (Table 2). Hence, of the clinically defined cases, 509 (65.3%) had detectable NPA IgA (positive or equivocal) and 479 (61.5%) were PCR positive [proportions not statistically different by Fisher’s exact test; Chi square, 2.49; p > 0.10].

Table 2.

PCR and NPA IgA results in clinically defined cases

PCR positive PCR negative Total
IgA positive 134 300 434
IgA equivocal 75 0 75
IgA negative 270 0 270

Total 479 300 779

Discussion

Our data demonstrates that both NPA PCR and IgA testing contribute significantly to laboratory notification of pertussis in our jurisdictions in the western half of Australia. The clinical data suggest that the described cohort had a high pretest clinical likelihood of pertussis.

Several studies have confirmed the increased sensitivity of PCR testing over culture for Bordetella infection [9, 10, 21]. It has been previously reported that pertussis cases are most likely to be PCR positive within the first 3 weeks of onset of symptoms, but may remain positive for significantly longer [11]. Results from our cohort are consistent with those published observations, but in our cases, NPA PCR remained positive occasionally for very prolonged periods (median of 2 weeks, range of 1 day to 12 weeks). Our experience suggests that, although the IS 481 PCR target used in these studies is not specific for B. pertussis, nonpertussis Bordetella species are exceedingly rare in our community (1.13% of 80 Bordetella isolates over 10 years). The sole B. bronchiseptica strain isolated over the study period tested negative in our IS 481 PCR assay, and these data suggesting a positive result in that test are highly likely to be due to true B. pertussis infection. The infrequency of nonpertussis Bordetella isolates in Australia has recently been confirmed by another study [22, 23].

B. pertussis-specific NPA mucosal IgA antibodies are described as appearing after the first week of infection and may persist for many months [7]. Similar findings are now reported from this cohort (mean cough duration of an IgA positive patient was 3.56 weeks; SD, 2.93). Many of our cases did not present until a number of weeks after onset of symptoms, especially in the adult group, when PCR assays are more likely to be negative. It would seem advisable, therefore, to use a testing strategy which combines both assays to identify patients presenting early and late in the disease course. Collecting an NPA sample gives the laboratory the optimum specimen to perform both assays. This is easily performed in an outpatient setting and is well tolerated by patients, even very young children, in our experience. Such specimens are also suitable for diagnosing alternative causes of prolonged cough syndromes, such as Mycoplasma and respiratory viruses. The recent vogue for using flocked swabs only yields a suitable specimen for PCR assays [24], but not mucosal IgA, and is therefore likely to be a suboptimal sample for Pertussis diagnosis.

The Australian laboratory notifiable criteria until the last year of this study specified whole-cell (WC) IgA serology (on blood or NPA specimens) as the only serological criteria for pertussis cases, and this technique is still the commonest one utilized in Australia by routine diagnostic laboratories. A European expert advisory group (Pertstrain) recently reviewed a published data on pertussis blood serology and concluded that IgG immunoassays should ideally use nondetoxified pertussis toxin (PT) as antigen, but this should not be used if vaccine has been administered within a year of testing (as vaccine induces IgG antibodies) [23]. WC IgA assays were not recommended because of a perceived lack of specificity, and IgA anti-PT was considered appropriate if IgG anti-PT levels were indeterminate or if a follow-up second specimen could not be obtained. These riders attached to the Pertstrain guidance would severely limit the role of IgG anti-PT in Australia because of our high vaccination rates. In addition, convalescent samples are rarely received by our laboratories (despite frequent requests to doctors) as part of the pertussis workup (i.e., 22/1086 [2%] of initial pertussis serological requests had follow-up blood serology specimens during this period). Certainly, our experience would suggest that specificity of WC IgA is unlikely to be a major issue because of the low prevalence of nonpertussis Bordetella strains in our community. A field study of 90 pertussis cases from Australia, in fact, found a WC IgA assay to be more specific than IgA-PT (87.5 vs. 58.3%) [26]. A prospective community study in Australia utilising multiple serum samples and in-house IgG-PT and IgA-PT assays showed similar specificity for both tests, but superior sensitivity for IgG-PT [27]. Until very recently, the lack of a commercial licensed IgG-PT assay in Australia and the difficulty of diagnostic laboratories obtaining multiple serum samples rendered Pertstrain recommendations unhelpful.

Pertstrain guidelines, however, do not have direct applicability for NPA serology. A single report of an unlicensed IgG anti-PT assay used in oral fluids (not NPA) from 197 patients was endorsed by Pertstrain because of a sensitivity of 79.7% and specificity of 96.6%, but there was neither a comparison with IgA anti-PT or WC IgA nor with NPA specimens [28]. Pertstrain did acknowledge that no commercial kit using this assay was licensed, rendering its advice of no current value to Australian diagnostic laboratories assaying NPA fluids. After the completion of our study, a licensed Pertussis Toxin IgA assay became available. A pilot study in our lab found 87% concordance between WC-IgA and PT-IgA assays performed on 259 archived positive and negative NPA samples. This would suggest that concerns about specificity of WC-IgA on NPA samples may be misguided.

Our cohort study identified 1700 definite positive cases of pertussis (1647 from WA and 53 NT) over 10 seasons in the west and north of Australia. Over this time period, 17,763 cases (14,713 from WA and 2050 NT) of pertussis were notified in WA and NT [29]; hence, 9.6% of these cases (11.2% of total pertussis notifications from WA and 2.6% from NT) were diagnosed by NPA in our laboratories. The above data show that if PCR was the only investigation performed in suspected pertussis cases, 43.1% of the definite cases would have been missed in this cohort. The percentage of cases missed by a PCR-only strategy was statistically lower (p < 0.0005) in the pediatric group (38.7%) than the proportion in the adult group (47.7%). Few other laboratories in our jurisdictions use NPA for diagnosis of pertussis, so it is likely that this method is currently underutilized in Australia and total cases of pertussis are underestimated. Culture is generally not a viable option in our region as specimens may take 48 h or more to reach the laboratory from remote settlements. As with other reported cohorts of pertussis, the majority of our patients were adults [4]. 56.9% of our cases had detectable NA by PCR, and 67.1% had detectable B. pertussis-specific NPA IgA. An age-related effect was apparent with higher PCR positivity in the pediatric group compared to the adult group. These observations probably reflect the tendency for children to present to their doctors earlier, during the period when PCR is more likely to be positive.

Interestingly, the positivity rate of different pertussis tests fluctuated markedly in different years (Table 3). For PCR in particular, the rate ranged from a low of 5.6% in 2006 to a high of 85.9% in 2010. The rate for NPA IgA positivity was more stable and only lower than the PCR rate in 3 years (2008, 2009, and 2010). Although transient technical problems in laboratory assays might conceivably produce a period of performance below historical data, the correlation with cough duration (which also has a seasonal fluctuation, r = 0.55 for PCR and 0.51 for IgA) would argue against this likelihood. Poor PCR diagnostic rates occurred in years where the recorded duration of cough in patients was unusually long and overall case numbers were low. This phenomenon may have been due to a less virulent circulating strain of Bordetella or lower community awareness of Pertussis due to lower incidence which may have resulted in late presentations and, hence, reduced utility of PCR testing. Interestingly, the lower positivity rates for NPA IgA correlated with years where the recorded duration of cough in patients was unusually short, which may possibly reflect seasons with more virulent circulating strains. Clinicians should be aware that individual test performance may vary significantly from season to season, and this underlines the need to use both PCR and NPA IgA serology to reliably diagnose pertussis. Our data suggest that PCR is more likely to be positive in cases during epidemic years than interepidemic years, whereas NPA IgA positivity does not significantly vary over seasons.

The common practice in our community is of doctors only submitting a nose or throat swab for PCR would result in many pertussis cases being missed, perhaps because of a misplaced belief that NPA collection was a traumatic procedure and, hence, be lost opportunities for public health intervention. NPA collection using soft catheters was well tolerated in our experience, including in very young children (specimens were obtained from 97 children below the age of 2 years, and 15 below 1 month). This experience has also been confirmed by controlled clinical trial, with NPA being shown to be better tolerated than nasopharyngeal swab collection [30]. The relative performance of NPA testing in our communities needs to be formally compared to more commonly requested methods such as respiratory swabs and blood serology.

We conclude that NPA samples for PCR and NPA IgA analysis contribute a significant number of laboratory-notified cases in our jurisdictions and are probably underutilized.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Narelle Raven from Princess Margaret Hospital, Microbiological colleagues at WDP (Drs. G. Rich, M. Leung, S. Halasz, D. McLellan, and D. Chih), and the Information Technology Department of Western Diagnostic Pathology for assistance in gathering data.

These data were presented in part at the following meetings: Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Nice, France 2010 and National Serology Reference Laboratory Annual Workshop, Melbourne, Australia 2010.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Miles H. Beaman, 1Department of Microbiology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, 74 McCoy St., Myaree, Western Australia 6154, Australia; 2University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia 6160, Australia; 3University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia.

Mahdad Karimi, 1Department of Microbiology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, 74 McCoy St., Myaree, Western Australia 6154, Australia.

Meredith Hodge, 1Department of Microbiology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, 74 McCoy St., Myaree, Western Australia 6154, Australia.

Anthony D. Keil, 4Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Thomas St., Subiaco, Western Australia 6008, Australia.

Peter Campbell, 4Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Thomas St., Subiaco, Western Australia 6008, Australia.

References

  • 1.De Serres G, Shadmani R, Duval B, Boulianne N, Déry P, Douville Fradet M, Rochette L, Halperin SA. Morbidity of pertussis in adolescents and adults. J Infect Dis. 2000 Jul;182(1):174–179. doi: 10.1086/315648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dworkin MS. Adults are whooping, but are internists listening? Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 17;142(10):832–835. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-10-200505170-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Forsyth K. Pertussis, still a formidable foe. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1487–1491. doi: 10.1086/522660. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cherry JD. The present and future control of pertussis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 15;51(6):663–667. doi: 10.1086/655826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Halperin SA, Bortolussi R, Wort AJ. Evaluation of culture, immunofluorescence, and serology for the diagnosis of pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):752–757. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.752-757.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goodman YE, Wort AJ, Jackson FL. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of pertussis immunoglobulin A in nasopharyngeal secretions as an indicator of recent infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Feb;13(2):286–292. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.2.286-292.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Granström G, Askelöf P, Granström M. Specific immunoglobulin A to Bordetella pertussis antigens in mucosal secretion for rapid diagnosis of whooping cough. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):869–874. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.869-874.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campbell PB, Masters PL, Rohwedder E. Whooping cough diagnosis: a clinical evaluation of complementing culture and immunofluorescence with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of pertussis immunoglobulin A in nasopharyngeal secretions. J Med Microbiol. 1988 Dec;27(4):247–254. doi: 10.1099/00222615-27-4-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Glare EM, Paton JC, Premier RR, Lawrence AJ, Nisbet IT. Analysis of a repetitive DNA sequence from Bordetella pertussis and its application to the diagnosis of pertussis using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1982–1987. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1982-1987.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loeffelholz MJ, Thompson CJ, Long KS, Gilchrist MJ. Comparison of PCR, culture, and direct fluorescent-antibody testing for detection of Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Sep;37(9):2872–2876. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.9.2872-2876.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Palmer CM, McCall B, Jarvinen K, Nissen MD. Bordetella pertussis PCR positivity, following onset of illness in children under 5 years of age. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2007 Jun;31(2):202–205. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2007.31.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lievano FA, Reynolds MA, Waring AL, Ackelsberg J, Bisgard KM, Sanden GN, Guris D, Golaz A, Bopp DJ, Limberger RJ, Smith PF. Issues associated with and recommendations for using PCR to detect outbreaks of pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Aug;40(8):2801–2805. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2801-2805.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kirkland K, Talbot EA, Lasky RA, McLellan RK, Montero JT, Barry MA, McCarthy TA, Gunn JE, Pendarvis JL, Han LL, Devasia RA, Edwards KM, Jones TF, Kretsinger K, Tondella ML, Tatti KM, Brown KH, Slade BA, Wu K-H, Lu X, Patel M. Outbreaks of respiratory illness mistakenly attributed to pertussis – New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Tennessee, 2004-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Aug 24;56(33):837–842. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. http://www9.health.gov.au/cda/Source/Rpt_4_sel.cfm. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Pertussis. 2010 accessed 25.9.14.
  • 15.Webby R. Pertussis program for new parents. North Territ Commun Dis Bull. 2008;15:20–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/056DAAB5640EFD2FCA25755E007629CC/$File/pertussis-song.pdf. PERTUSSIS: National guidelines for public health units. 2010 accessed 25.9.14.
  • 17.Jasinska EM, Campbell BP, Blake BP. Evaluation of a commercial Bordetella pertussis serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of pertussis mucosal IgA in nasopharyngeal secretions. Abstract no. P09.11; Annual Scientific Meeting; Melbourne. Australian Society for Microbiology; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kosters K, Reischl U, Schmetz J, Riffelmann M, Wirsig von Konig CH. Real-time LightCycler PCR for detection and discrimination of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:1719–1722. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1719-1722.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical statistics. San Mateo, CA: Appleton and Lange; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-casedefinitions.htm/$File/casedef-V4.pdf. Surveillance Case Definitions for the Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. 2011 accessed 25.9.14.
  • 21.Riffelmann M, Wirsing von König CH, Caro V, Guiso N. Nucleic Acid amplification tests for diagnosis of Bordetella infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Oct;43(10):4925–4929. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.4925-4929.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cox HC, Jacob K, Whiley DM, Bletchly C, Nimmo GR, Nissen MD, Sloots TP. Further evidence that the IS481 target is suitable for real-time PCR detection of Bordetella pertussis. Pathology. 2013 Feb;45(2):202–203. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32835cc2d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cox HC, Jacob K, Whiley DM, Bletchly C, Nimmo GR, Nissen MD, Sloots TP. Bordetella holmesii and pertussis diagnosis: authors' reply. Pathology. 2013 Aug;45(5):532. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283639c0d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abu-Diab A, Azzeh M, Ghneim R, Ghneim R, Zoughbi M, Turkuman S, Rishmawi N, Issa AE, Siriani I, Dauodi R, Kattan R, Hindiyeh MY. Comparison between pernasal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates for detection of common respiratory viruses in samples from children. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jul;46(7):2414–2417. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00369-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guiso N, Berbers G, Fry NK, He Q, Riffelmann M, Wirsing von König CH. What to do and what not to do in serological diagnosis of pertussis: recommendations from EU reference laboratories. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Mar;30(3):307–312. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1104-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Poynten M, Hanlon M, Irwig L, Gilbert GL. Serological diagnosis of pertussis: evaluation of IgA against whole cell and specific Bordetella pertussis antigens as markers of recent infection. Epidemiol Infect. 2002 Apr;128(2):161–167. doi: 10.1017/s0950268801006598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.May ML, Doi SA, King D, Evans J, Robson JM. Prospective evaluation of an Australian pertussis toxin IgG and IgA enzyme immunoassay. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Feb;19(2):190–197. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05430-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Litt DJ, Samuel D, Duncan J, Harnden A, George RC, Harrison TG. Detection of anti-pertussis toxin IgG in oral fluids for use in diagnosis and surveillance of Bordetella pertussis infection in children and young adults. J Med Microbiol. 2006 Sep;55(Pt 9):1223–1228. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46543-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. http://www9.health.gov.au/cda/Source/Rpt_4_sel. cfm. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. 2010 accessed 25.9.14.
  • 30.Hallander HO, Reizenstein E, Renemar B, Rasmuson G, Mardin L, Olin P. Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirates with swabs for culture of Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jan;31(1):50–52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.1.50-52.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology are provided here courtesy of Akadémiai Kiadó

RESOURCES