Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1973 Nov;70(11):3150–3154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.11.3150

Quantitation of Membrane Sites in Aggregating Dictyostelium Cells by Use of Tritiated Univalent Antibody

H Beug 1, F E Katz 1, A Stein 1, G Gerisch 1
PMCID: PMC427190  PMID: 4522296

Abstract

Cell-to-cell adhesion during aggregation of Dictyostelium discoideum cells is completely blocked by univalent antibody (Fab) directed against two classes of target sites: surface structures characteristic for aggregation-competent cells (“contact sites A”) and others present also on growth-phase cells (“contact sites B”). 3 × 105 Fab molecules bound per cell are sufficient to block contact sites A completely, although the Fab fragments cover not more than 2% of the total cell surface. Up to 8-fold this value can be bound per cell when Fab fragments of another specificity are used, without affecting activity of contact sites A. Blockage of cell-to-cell adhesion therefore depends on the binding of Fab fragments to specific target sites, rather than on the total number of Fab molecules bound per cell. This conclusion is also valid for cell adhesion attributed to contact sites B. Contact sites therefore represent a special class of cell-surface sites which, in cell homogenates as well as in vivo, can be traced by Fab, and which are not identical with the bulk of cell-surface antigens present on aggregating cells.

Keywords: cell contacts, differentiation, slime molds, membrane factors, cap formation by IgG

Full text

PDF
3150

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beug H., Gerisch G. A micromethod for routine measurement of cell agglutination and dissociation. J Immunol Methods. 1972 Nov;2(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(72)90017-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beug H., Gerisch G., Kempff S., Riedel V., Cremer G. Specific inhibition of cell contact formation in Dictyostelium by univalent antibodies. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Nov;63(1):147–158. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90343-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beug H., Katz F. E., Gerisch G. Dynamics of antigenic membrane sites relating to cell aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum. J Cell Biol. 1973 Mar;56(3):647–658. doi: 10.1083/jcb.56.3.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GREGG J. H. Serological investigations of cell adhesion in the slime molds, Dictyostelium discoideum, Dictyostelium purpureum, and Polysphondylium violaceum. J Gen Physiol. 1956 May 20;39(5):813–820. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.5.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerisch G., Malchod, Wilhelms H., Lüderitz O. Artspezifität Polysaccharid-haltiger Zellmembran-Antigene von Dictyostelium discoideum. Eur J Biochem. 1969 Jun;9(2):229–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1969.tb00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hämmerling U., Shigeno N., Old L. J., Boyse E. A. Labelling of mouse alloantibody with tritiated dl-alanine. Immunology. 1969 Dec;17(6):999–1006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Raff M. C., De Petris S. Movement of lymphocyte surface antigens and receptors: the fluid nature of the lymphocyte plasma membrane and its immunological significance. Fed Proc. 1973 Jan;32(1):48–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Valentine R. C., Green N. M. Electron microscopy of an antibody-hapten complex. J Mol Biol. 1967 Aug 14;27(3):615–617. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zaitlin M. The preparation of tritium-labeled Fab antibody fragments. Immunochemistry. 1971 Jun;8(6):569–573. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(71)90410-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES