Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2013 May 9;94(1):46–54. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9733-7

Cadherin-Mediated Cell-Cell Adhesion and Signaling in the Skeleton

Pierre J Marie 1,2, Eric Haÿ 1,2, Dominique Modrowski 1,2, Leila Revollo 3, Gabriel Mbalaviele 3, Roberto Civitelli 3
PMCID: PMC4272239  NIHMSID: NIHMS648787  PMID: 23657489

Abstract

Direct cell-to-cell interactions via cell adhesion molecules, in particular cadherins, are critical for morphogenesis, tissue architecture, and cell sorting and differentiation. Partially overlapping, yet distinct roles of N-cadherin (cadherin-2) and cadherin-11 in the skeletal system have emerged from mouse genetics and in vitro studies. Both cadherins are important for precursor commitment to the osteogenic lineage, and genetic ablation of Cdh2 and Cdh11 results in skeletal growth defects and impaired bone formation. While Cdh11 defines the osteogenic lineage, persistence of Cdh2 in osteoblasts in vivo actually inhibits their terminal differentiation and impairs bone formation. The action of cadherins involves both cell-cell adhesion and interference with intracellular signaling, and in particular the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Both cadherin-2 and cadherin-11 bind to β-catenin, thus modulating its cytoplasmic pools and transcriptional activity. Recent data demonstrate that cadherin-2 also interferes with Lrp5/6 signaling by sequestering these receptors in inactive pools via axin binding. These data extend the biologic action of cadherins in bone forming cells, and provide novel mechanisms for development of therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing bone formation.

Keywords: Cadherins, cell-cell adhesion, osteoblast differentiation, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, bone formation

Introduction

Bone formation is a complex process involving the commitment of mesenchymal stem cells to osteoprogenitors and their progressive differentiation into mature, matrix producing osteoblasts. Mesenchymal or skeletal stem cells can also give rise to chondrocytes or adipocytes under induction by systemic or local factors. Osteogenic differentiation is characterized by sequential up-regulation of specific transcription factors that modulate expression of osteoblast genes [1, ]2]. Once new bone is deposited, some osteoblasts become flattened lining cells, a few remain embedded into the mineralized matrix and become osteocytes, while the majority undergo apoptosis [3]. Multiple signaling pathways regulate osteoprogenitor cell committment, differentiation and survival [4]. Additionally, direct cell-cell interactions via cell adhesion molecules and gap junctions occur during osteoblastogenesis allowing synchronization of cell activity among obsteoblasts, and between osteoblasts and osteocytes in the mature skeleton [5, 6, 7].

Cadherins are single chain transmembrane glycoproteins that mediate calcium-dependent homophilic cell-cell adhesion. Based on their molecular structure, “classical” cadherins are classified as Type I, which includes E-cadherin/cadherin-1 (gene name, Cdh1), N-cadherin/cadherin-2 (Cdh2), P-cadherin/cadherin-3 (Cdh3), R-cadherin/cadherin-4 (Cdh4); and Type II cadherins [8]. Cadherin-11 (Cdh11), previously called “osteoblast cadherin” [9, 10], is a type II cadherin prevalently expressed in mesodermal derived tissues [8, 11]. Other members of this superfamily of cell adhesion molecules include desmosomal cadherins, protocadherins, and other cadherin-related molecules [12-14]. Cadherins associate as homodimers by lateral clustering, and these cis-dimers bind to cadherins on opposing cells to form trans-dimers, thus allowing cell-cell adhesion. Cadherins are anchored to the actin cytoskeleton via binding to α-, β-, and γ-catenin (plakoglobin) in a complex that forms the adherens junction [15, 16]. Since β-catenin is also a key component of the canonical Wnt signaling system, cadherins can also modulate signal transduction via Wnt/β-catenin in multiple ways [17, 18]. In this review, we focus on recent advances on the biologic role of direct cell-cell interactions via cadherins in the skeleton, and highlight the concept that cadherins interfere with signaling pathways that are key to osteogenic differentiation, skeletal development, and homeostasis.

Cadherins in chondrogenesis

Since cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is essential for tissue development [19], regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, and suvival [20], it is not surprising that cadherins are intimately involved in skeletal development. Both Cdh2 and Cdh11 are expressed during early mesenchyme condensation [21, 22]. Specifically, Cdh2 increases during early chondrogenic differentiation and progressively decreases at late stages of chondrogenesis [23, 24, 25]. Substantiating a role in early chondroblast differentiation, in vitro perturbation of cadherin-2 mediated cell-cell contacts inhibits mesenchymal condensation as well as chondrogenesis in micromass cultures [26-28] and in embryonic chick limbs [29]. However contrary to these in vitro data, ex vivo limb bud cultures from Cdh2 null embryos partially rescued by transgenic expression of Cdh1 undergo cartilage condensation and develop into structured limbs [30], suggesting that cadherin-2 is not essential for limb morphogenesis. Resolution of this discrepancy would require models of conditional Cdh2 inactivation in chondrocytes. Intriguingly, persistence of Cdh2 prevents further progression from precartilage condensation to chondrocyte development [31, 32], implying that while Cdh2 may be involved in early stages of chondrogenesis [26] it may restrain progression of chondrogenic differentation. As noted later, this concept also applies to osteogenesis (Figure 1). Cadherin-2 control of chondrogenesis involves both modulation of cell-cell adhesion, and interplay with Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling [26, 33]. Specifically, BMP-2 increases Cdh2 expression during chondrogenic differentiation; and a dominant negative Cdh2 mutant inhibits BMP-2-stimulated chondrogenesis in vitro [27].

Figure 1. Homophilic cadherin interactions promote cell-cell adhesion and osteoblast differentiation during the early stages of bone formation.

Figure 1

Mesenchymal stem cells express many cadherins at low abundance. Both Cdh2 and Cdh11 increase with commitment to the osteogenic lineage, but as differentiation progresses Cdh2 expression decreases whereas Cdh11 persits. Terminally differentiated bone forming cells loose cadherin-2 and cell-cell adhesion; many undergo apoptosis, a few become osteocytes, matrix embedded cells with very limited physical contacts with other cells. Cdh2 is also up-regulated during early steps of chondrogenic differentiation, whereas Cdh11 is not present in condensed growth plate chondrocytes. Differentiated chondrocyte do not express either cadherin. Adipogenic differentiation is associated with loss of both Cdh2 and Cdh11. Indeed, Cdh11 inhibits adipogenesis, while favoring chondro-osteogenesis.

Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion in osteoblastogenesis

Osteogenic precursors express a repertoire of cadherins, including Cdh1, Cdh2, Cdh3 and Cdh11 [34, 35, 36, 37-41]. These multiple cadherins are present at low levels in undifferentiated cells, but as cells commit to the different lineages the relative expression of cadherins changes. Specifically, R-cadherin/cadherin-4 is rapidly down regulated as cells undergo osteogenic differentiation, whereas Cdh11 is up regulated and it is present throughout the osteoblast differentiation program [34, 41, 42]. On the other hand, Cdh2 initially increases with osteogenic commitment [37, 43, 44-47], but as differentiation progresses it is down-regulated and it is barely detectable in fully differentiated osteoblasts, in vitro [42, 48, 49]. In sections of adult mouse bone, cadherin-2 is abundant in cells lining the bone surfaces, primarily in trabecular bone, but it is not detectable in the bone marrow, or in periosteal cells or osteocytes [49]. Accordingly, neither Cdh2 nor Cdh11 expression was found in the osteocytic cells line MLO-Y4 [41]. In vivo, the only place where cadherins (or any cell adhesion molecule) would be present are the tips of the osteocyte processes; thus, their abundance wound be rather low. These findings underscore partially overlapping but distinct functions of Cdh2 and Cdh11 at different stages of osteogenesis. However, the mechanisms involved in the differential regulation of cadherins during osteogenesis are unknown.

On the contrary, both Cdh2 and Cdh11 are down-regulated with commitment to adipogenesis, and they are absent in adipocytes [41, 42], suggesting that coexpression of Cdh2 and Cdh11 may be permissive of commitment to osteogenic differentiation and oppose adipogenesis. Indeed, teratomas originating from cells overexpressing Cdh11 form preferentially bone and cartilage tissue [41]; and interference with cadherin-2-mediated cell-cell adhesion using either a HAV inhibitory peptide (specific for type I cadherins, thus not interfering with cadherin-11 adhesion), neutralizing antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides, or transfection of a Cdh2 mutant with dominant negative action reduces osteoblast differentiation in vitro [37, 44, 45]. However, bone marrow stromal cells isolated from Cdh2 haploinsufficient mice or from conditionally osteoblast/osteocyte Cdh2 deleted mice differentiate faster in vitro [48, 49], and the number of osteoprogenitors is increased in Cdh2 haploinsufficient or osteoblast Cdh2 deficient mice [48, 50], suggesting that Cdh2 may inhibit later stages of differentiation. The accumulated data support a model whereby both Cdh2 and Cdh11 contribute to osteogenic commitment, but for the osteogenic program to proceed to terminal differentiation Cdh2 must be down-regulated, leaving Cdh11 as the most abundant cadherin present in fully differentiated bone forming cells (Figure 1). This model is also borne out of in vivo data in Cdh2 mutant mice (see below).

Regulation of cadherins in osteoblastic cells

Several factors that regulate osteoblast differentiation and survival modulate cadherin expression and/or function. Notably, the stimulatory effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and BMP-2 on early stages of osteoblastogenesis are linked to increased Cdh2 expression [34, 37, 45]. In contrast, dexamethasone inhibits Cdh2 and Cdh11 expression in long term culture of bone marrow stromal cells and human trabecular osteoblasts [51]. Both tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and interleukin-1 (Il-1) also suppress Cdh2 but not Cdh11 cadherin expression, resulting in decreased cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and osteoblast differentiation [52]. On the other hand, fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) increases Cdh2 expression in human osteoblasts via protein kinase Cα (PKCα) and Src activation, resulting in increased cell-cell adhesion [53]. Corroborating a role for PKCα in cadherin-2 modulation of osteoblast differentiation, direct activation of PKCα increases Cdh2, cell-cell adhesion, and ALP activity [54]. These findings are consistent with observations of increased Cdh2 expression and osteoblast differentiation in cells derived from subjects with Apert syndrome, a craniosynostosis linked to constitutive activation of FGF receptor-2 (FGFR2) [55]. This observation provides further demonstration that cadherin-2-mediated cell-cell adhesion favors osteogenesis [56]. Other signaling and downstream molecular mechanisms are likely to control Cdh2 expression in osteoblasts, as indicated by analysis of the human Cdh2 promoter [57]. Cadherin-2 may also be involved in modulation of osteoblast survival, as suggested by reduced cadherin-2-mediated cell-cell adhesion during apoptosis, and by induction of osteoblast apoptosis upon disruption of cell-cell adhesion by an anti-cadherin-2 antibody [58]. Finally, data also suggest that Il-1 and TNFα may induce osteoblast apoptosis [59] by downregulating Cdh2 expression [58].

Cadherins in bone development and homeostasis

Definitive proof of the biologic role of cadherins in bone development and homeostasis has emerged from mouse genetics studies. Germline Cdh2 ablation is embyonic lethal [60]. However, transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative Cdh2 mutant – lacking most of the extracellular adhesion domain – in osteoblasts/osteocytes driven by the Bglap (osteocalcin) promoter exhibit delayed acquisition of peak bone mass, reduced bone formation, and impaired osteoblast differentiation [61]. Likewise, targeted overexpression of Cdh2 in osteoblasts driven by the Col1A1 promoter also results in decreased bone formation and low bone mass in young mice [62]. The similarity of these phenotypes underlines similar mechanisms causative of the osteoblast defect, related to interference with Wnt/β-catenin signalling by the overabundant wild type or mutant cadherin proteins (see below). However, conditional Cdh2 ablation in osteoblast/osteocytes driven by either the Col1A1 or the more broadly expressed Osx promoter also results in smaller bones, age-dependent osteopenia and decreased bone strength [49, 50]. These apparently contrasting results likely reflect the different functions of cadherin-2 at different stages of osteoblast differentiation (Figure 1). While persistence of Cdh2 in mature osteoblasts retards differentiation (thus resulting in low bone mass in Cdh2 overexpressing mice), lack of Cdh2 in bone forming cells is associated with decreased number of stromal cell precursors [50], thus resulting in decreased availability of new osteoblasts. This may explain the low bone mass and developmental defects in conditional Cdh2 knockout mice. Notably, decrease in bone marrow stromal precursors occurs in mice where Cdh2 deletion is restricted to mature osteoblasts and osteocytes [50]; and transgenic expression of a dominant-negative Cdh2 mutant in differentiated osteoblasts results in an osteoblast to adipocyte shift in bone marrow precursors [61]. Hence, cadherin-2 may possibly permit direct cell-cell interactions between osteoblasts and stromal stem cells, ultimately regulating their self-renewal and fate. Lack of cadherin-2 in supporting cells (differentiated osteoblasts) could lead to loss of stem cells or precursors, and decreased osteoblastogenesis potential [63]. Examples of such stem cell-niche cells interactions via cadherin-2 exist in other systems [64, 65], and a similar mechanism has been proposed for osteoblast support of hematopoietic stem cells [66]. However, this concept has been recently challenged [49, 67], and it is the subject of another review in this series.

Despite considerable in vitro evidence for a role of cadherin-11 in osteoblastogenesis (discussed earlier), germline deletion of Cdh11 leads to only modest osteopenia in young mice [61]. Indeed, adult Cdh11 knockout mice show no obvious skeletal defects, although they have increased number of bone marrow adipogenic precursors and spontaneous emergence of adipocytes in calvaria cell cultures [50]. These data confirm an anti-adipogenic action of Cdh11, and it is likely that in vivo Cdh2 may partially compensate for lack of Cdh11 in regulating osteoblastogenesis and bone development [50]. Supporting this hypothesis, double Cdh2;Cdh11 null embryos exhibit a more severe disruption of somite structure than single cadherin gene deletion [68]; and ablation of one Cdh2 allele in a Cdh11 null background in mice leads to overt skeletal growth defect, severe osteopenia and reduced resistance to fractures [50]. Intriguingly, a recent report indicates that Cdh1 may also control osteoblast function via induction of Smurf1 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, leading to reduced MEKK2 activation and osteogenic differentiation of calvaria cell cultures [69]. It remains to be determined whether this mechanism may be targeted for promoting osteogenesis in vivo. Notably, Cdh1 is not expressed by human trabecular bone osteoblasts [34].

Earlier work had shown that E-cadherin is important for osteoclast precursor fusion [70], and that cadherin-6, the murine homologue of human K-cadherin, and its splice variant, cadherin-6/2, mediate heterophilic interactions between osteoclast precursors and stromal supporting cells [71]. More recently, another group reported that N-cadherin in osteogenic cells modulates osteoclastogenesis via β -catenin dependent regulation of RANKL expression [72]. Finally, cadherins have been shown in the actin ring of the osteoclast sealing zone, sugesting a possible role in osteoclast attachment to the matrix [73]. However, in vivo corroboration of cadherin role in osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption is still missing.

Cadherin-Wnt/β-catenin signalling interactions in osteoblastogenesis

In addition to their function in the adherens junction, cadherins interfere with intracellular signaling pathways in several cell types [74, 75]. Indeed, cadherins may retain signalling properties even after modifications that abrogate their adhesive properties by cleavage, shedding, or mutations [76]. It is rather intuitive that cadherins may affect the Wnt pathway simply because cadherins bind to β-catenin, a key component of the canonical Wnt signaling [77, 78]. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is activated by binding of Wnt ligands to LRP5/6 and Frizzled co-receptors, followed by recruitment of a complex including axin/Frat1/APC/glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β). This is turn leads to inhibition of GSK-3, decreased β-catenin phosphorylation at specific sites near its N-terminus, and subsequent β-catenin translocation to the nucleus where it binds TCF/LEF transcription factors to activate gene transcription [79]. Association of cadherin with β-catenin contributes to stabilize the adhesion structure [80]. Conversely, release of β-catenin from cadherins destabilizes the adhesion complex, thus facilitating cell movement [81]. On the other hand, cell-cell adhesion via cadherins promotes β-catenin phosphorylation and inactivation [82]. Thus, an inverse relationship exists between cell adhesion and Wnt/β-catenin singaling, though the interplay between cadherins and signalling is more complex than such simple notion may predict. Indeed, increased cadherin abundance on the cell surface has a sequestration effect on β-catenin, resulting in decreased β-catenin nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity [81, 83-85] (Figure 2). Considering the important role of Wnt signalling in osteoblastogenesis and bone formation [86-88], the potential impact of such interaction on bone homeostasis is easily predictable. As already noted, overexpression of a dominant-negative Cdh2 mutant in differentiated osteoblasts leads to β-catenin sequestration at the cell surface and decreased bone formation [61]. A negative effect on bone formation has also been shown by Cdh2 overexpression in differentiated osteoblasts [89]; whereas deletion of either Cdh2, Cdh11, or both reduces β-catenin abundance at cell-cell contacts and cell-cell adhesion with a negative effect on osteoblastogenesis and bone growth [50]. In vitro evidence also suggests that modulation of cadherin-2/β-catenin association may be involved in transduction of mechanical signals. Oscillatory fluid flow releases β-catenin from adherens junctions, resulting in β-catenin nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation, in turn contributing to osteogenic differentiation [90].

Figure 2. Interaction between cadherins and Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Figure 2

Cadherin cis-dimers are connected to the actin cytoskeleton via binding to β-catenin and γ-catenin (plakoglobin), which in turn bind α-catenin and throough it, actin. Cytoplasmic β-catenin – not bound to cadherins – can translocate to the nucleus to induce gene transcription, and its levels are kept in homeostatic balance by glucose synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) phosphorylation and targeting for ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation. GSK3β is inhibited by binding to an APC/axin/GSK3β complex, which forms in response to Wnt activation of Frizzled receptors. Since β-catenin bound to cadherins is kept away from transcriptionally active pools, increased cadherin expression results in β-catenin sequestration at the plasma membrane and reduced β-catenin availability for transcriptional activation.

An alternative mechanism of cadherin interaction with Wnt signalling components has recently emerged from observations that cadherin-2 can sequester Lrp5 or Lrp6 in inactive pools, thus resulting in decreased Wnt/β-catenin signalling in osteoblasts [62]. Specifically, cadherin-2 forms a complex with Lrp5/6 via an axin “bridge”, thus preventing Lrp5/6 activation of β-catenin, which is instead targeted for proteasomal degradation (Figure 3A). The result is defective canonical Wnt signalling, decreased osteogenic differentiation, reduced osteoblast function and bone formation [62]. Furthermore, cadherin-2-mediated adhesion has been linked to activation of PI3K signalling in osteoblastic cells [91]. Consistently, cadherin-2/Lrp5/6 interaction negatively controls osteoblast growth and survival by reducing endogenous Wnt3a expression as well as Wnt-dependent PI3K/Akt signalling [92]. The emerging evidence that cadherins control osteogenic differentiation and bone formation may conceptually be used to devise new therapeutic approaches for promoting bone formation and increasing bone mass [6, 63]. Along these lines, a strategy has been developed to inhibit cadherin-2/Lrp5/6 interaction via axin [62], with the aim of facilitating canonical Wnt signaling and bone formation. Proof-of-principle of this strategy is provided by the finding that deletion of the cadherin-2 domain interacting with axin and Lrp5/6 promotes Wnt/β-catenin signalling and osteoblast differentiation without affecting cell-cell adhesion [89]. Consequently, peptides that bind to the cadherin-2/axin interacting domain of Lrp5 and disrupt cadherin-2-Lrp5/6 interaction enhance Wnt/β-catenin signalling, stimulate osteoblast function in vitro, and promote calvaria bone formation in vivo [89] (Figure 3B). Such competitor peptide based strategy represents a novel approach that could be applied to conditions characterized by insufficient bone formation relative to bone resorption [93]. Recent preliminary data, also suggest that cadherin-2 may restrain the bone anabolic action of Lrp5/6 signaling activators [94], and even of intermittent PTH [95]. If these data hold, they will further expand cadherin-2 biologic role in bone forming cells, and strengthen the notion that cadherins represent legitimate targets for pharmacological intervention.

Figure 3. Cadherin-2 is a negative regulator of full osteoblast differentiation.

Figure 3

Cadherin-2 (via the 62 amino-acids at the C-terminus) interacts with the Wnt co-receptors LRP5/6 via binding to axin through its C-terminus domain. Such interaction prevents activation of β-catenin, ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt signalling, resulting in inhibition of cell proliferation, reduced osteoblast differentiation and survival (left panel). Disruption of cadherin-2-axin-LRP5/6 interaction by a small competitor peptide (28AA) removes this inhibitory interaction on LRP5/6, thus allowing activation of signalling cascades leading to cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and bone formation (right panel).

Acknowledgements

Some of the work reported in this paper was supported by grants from the European Commission FP6 and FP7 research funding programs (LSHM-CT-2003-503020, HEALTH-F2-2008-201099 to PJM), the United States National Institutes of Health (AR055913, AR056678 to RC), and funds from the Société Française de Rhumatologie (to PJM) and the Barnes-Jewish Foundation (to RC).

Footnotes

Disclosures

Roberto Civitelli receives grant support from Amgen and Pfizer, and owns stock of Eli-Lilly, Merck, and Amgen. All other authors state they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Aubin JE. Regulation of osteoblast formation and function. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2001;2:81–94. doi: 10.1023/a:1010011209064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marie PJ. Transcription factors controlling osteoblastogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manolagas SC. Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:115–137. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.2.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marie PJ. Signaling pathways affecting skeletal health. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 10:190–198. doi: 10.1007/s11914-012-0109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Civitelli R. Cell-cell communication in the osteoblast/osteocyte lineage. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473:188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marie PJ. Role of N-cadherin in bone formation. J Cell Physiol. 2002;190:297–305. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Civitelli R, Stains JP, Shin CS, Jørgensen N. Intercellular junctions and cell-cell communication in the skeletal system. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Martin TJ, editors. Principles of Bone Biology. Academic Press; San Diego: 2008. pp. 425–444. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yagi T, Takeichi M. Cadherin superfamily genes: functions, genomic organization, and neurologic diversity. Genes and Development. 2000;14:1169–1180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Okazaki M, Takeshita S, Kawai S, Kikuno R, Tsujimura A, Kudo A, Amann E. Molecular cloning and characterization of OB-cadherin, a new member of cadherin family expressed in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12092–12098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kudo A, Okazaki M, Takeshita S, Kawai S, Amann E. OB-cadherin, a new member of the cadherin family expressed in osteoblasts. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1994;9:S127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takeichi M. The cadherin cell adhesion receptor family: roles in multicellular organization and neurogenesis. Progress in Clinical and Biologic Research. 1994;390:145–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Geiger B, Ayalon O. Cadherins. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992;8:307–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grunwald GB. The structural and functional analysis of cadherin calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecules. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993;5:797–805. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90028-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Takeichi M, Nakagawa S. Cadherin-dependent cell-cell adhesion. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2001 doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0903s00. Chapter 9:Unit 9 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nagafuchi A. Molecular architecture of adherens junctions. Current Opinions in Cell Biology. 2001;13:600–603. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00257-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Troyanovsky SM. Mechanism of cell-cell adhesion complex assembly. Curr.Opin.Cell Biol. 1999;11:561–566. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)00021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bienz M. beta-Catenin: a pivot between cell adhesion and Wnt signalling. Curr Biol. 2005;15:R64–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brembeck FH, Rosario M, Birchmeier W. Balancing cell adhesion and Wnt signaling, the key role of beta-catenin. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Larue L, Antos C, Butz S, Huber O, Delmas V, Dominis M, Kemler R. A role for cadherins in tissue formation. Development. 1996;122:3185–3194. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.10.3185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gumbiner BM. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:622–634. doi: 10.1038/nrm1699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oberlender SA, Tuan RS. Spatiotemporal profile of N-cadherin expression in the developing limb mesenchyme. Cell Adhes Commun. 1994;2:521–537. doi: 10.3109/15419069409014216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Simonneau L, Kitagawa M, Suzuki S, Thiery JP. Cadherin 11 expression marks the mesenchymal phenotype: towards new functions for cadherins? Cell Adhes Commun. 1995;3:115–130. doi: 10.3109/15419069509081281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oberlender SA, Tuan RS. Expression and functional involvement of N-cadherin in embryonic limb chondrogenesis. Development. 1994;120:177–187. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tavella S, Raffo P, Tacchetti C, Cancedda R, Castagnola P. N-CAM and N-cadherin expression during in vitro chondrogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 1994;215:354–362. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsonis PA, Del Rio-Tsonis K, Millan JL, Wheelock MJ. Expression of N-cadherin and alkaline phosphatase in chick limb bud mesenchymal cells: regulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or TGF-beta 1. Exp Cell Res. 1994;213:433–437. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tuan RS. Cellular signaling in developmental chondrogenesis: N-cadherin, Wnts, and BMP-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(Suppl 2):137–141. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200300002-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haas AR, Tuan RS. Chondrogenic differentiation of murine C3H10T1/2 multipotential mesenchymal cells: II. Stimulation by bone morphogenetic protein-2 requires modulation of N-cadherin expression and function. Differentiation. 1999;64:77–89. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.1999.6420077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tuli R, Tuli S, Nandi S, Huang X, Manner PA, Hozack WJ, Danielson KG, Hall DJ, Tuan RS. Transforming growth factor-beta-mediated chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal progenitor cells involves N-cadherin and mitogen-activated protein kinase and Wnt signaling cross-talk. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:41227–41236. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305312200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oberlender SA, Tuan RS. Application of functional blocking antibodies. N-cadherin and chick embryonic limb development. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;137:37–42. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-066-7:37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Luo Y, Kostetskii I, Radice GL. N-cadherin is not essential for limb mesenchymal chondrogenesis. Developmental Dynamics. 2005;232:336–344. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.DeLise AM, Tuan RS. Alterations in the spatiotemporal expression pattern and function of N-cadherin inhibit cellular condensation and chondrogenesis of limb mesenchymal cells in vitro. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2002;87:342–359. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cho SH, Oh CD, Kim SJ, Kim IC, Chun JS. Retinoic acid inhibits chondrogenesis of mesenchymal cells by sustaining expression of N-cadherin and its associated proteins. J Cell Biochem. 2003;89:837–847. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Delise AM, Tuan RS. Analysis of N-cadherin function in limb mesenchymal chondrogenesis in vitro. Dev Dyn. 2002;225:195–204. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheng SL, Lecanda F, Davidson MK, Warlow PM, Zhang SF, Zhang L, Suzuki S, St John T, Civitelli R. Human osteoblasts express a repertoire of cadherins, which are critical for BMP-2-induced osteogenic differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:633–644. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gunduz V, Kong E, Bryan CD, Hinds PW. Loss of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein in murine calvaria facilitates immortalization of osteoblast-adipocyte bipotent progenitor cells characterized by low expression of N-cadherin. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:2561–2569. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06453-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Turel KR, Rao SG. Expression of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin by the human bone marrow stromal cells and its probable role in CD34(+) stem cell adhesion. Cell Biol Int. 1998;22:641–648. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1998.0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ferrari SL, Traianedes K, Thorne M, Lafage-Proust MH, Genever P, Cecchini MG, Behar V, Bisello A, Chorev M, Rosenblatt M, Suva LJ. A role for N-cadherin in the development of the differentiated osteoblastic phenotype. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:198–208. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lemonnier J, Delannoy P, Hott M, Lomri A, Modrowski D, Marie PJ. The Ser252Trp fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR-2) mutation induces PKC-independent downregulation of FGFR-2 associated with premature calvaria osteoblast differentiation. Exp Cell Res. 2000;256:158–167. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Luegmayr E, Glantschnig H, Varga F, Klaushofer K. The organization of adherens junctions in mouse osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) and their modulation by triiodothyronine and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Histochem Cell Biol. 2000;113:467–478. doi: 10.1007/s004180000152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Goomer RS, Maris T, Amiel D. Age-related changes in the expression of cadherin-11, the mesenchyme specific calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule. Calcif Tissue Int. 1998;62:532–537. doi: 10.1007/s002239900474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kawaguchi J, Kii I, Sugiyama Y, Takeshita S, Kudo A. The transition of cadherin expression in osteoblast differentiation from mesenchymal cells: consistent expression of cadherin-11 in osteoblast lineage. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:260–269. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shin CS, Lecanda F, Sheikh S, Weitzmann L, Cheng SL, Civitelli R. Relative abundance of different cadherins defines differentiation of mesenchymal precursors into osteogenic, myogenic, or adipogenic pathways. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2000;78:566–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lin WL, Chien HH, Cho MI. N-cadherin expression during periodontal ligament cell differentiation in vitro. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1039–1045. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cheng SL, Shin CS, Towler DA, Civitelli R. A dominant negative cadherin inhibits osteoblast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:2362–2370. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hay E, Lemonnier J, Modrowski D, Lomri A, Lasmoles F, Marie PJ. N- and E-cadherin mediate early human calvaria osteoblast differentiation promoted by bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Cell Physiol. 2000;183:117–128. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200004)183:1<117::AID-JCP14>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miron RJ, Hedbom E, Ruggiero S, Bosshardt DD, Zhang Y, Mauth C, Gemperli AC, Iizuka T, Buser D, Sculean A. Premature osteoblast clustering by enamel matrix proteins induces osteoblast differentiation through up-regulation of connexin 43 and N-cadherin. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kii I, Amizuka N, Shimomura J, Saga Y, Kudo A. Cell-cell interaction mediated by cadherin-11 directly regulates the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into the cells of the osteo-lineage and the chondro-lineage. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1840–1849. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fang LC, Cheng SL, Mbalaviele G, Donsante C, Watkins M, Radice GL, Civitelli R. Accentuated ovariectomy induced bone loss and altered osteogenesis in hyeterozygous N-cadherin null mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21:1897–1906. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Greenbaum AM, Revollo LD, Woloszynek JR, Civitelli R, Link DC. N-cadherin in osteolineage cells is not required for maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2012;120:295–302. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-377457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Di Benedetto A, Watkins M, Grimston S, Salazar V, Donsante C, Mbalaviele G, Radice GL, Civitelli R. N-cadherin and cadherin 11 modulate postnatal bone growth and osteoblast differentiation by distinct mechanisms. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:2640–2648. doi: 10.1242/jcs.067777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lecanda F, Cheng SL, Shin CS, Davidson MK, Warlow P, Avioli LV, Civitelli R. Differential regulation of cadherins by dexamethasone in human osteoblastic cells. J Cell Biochem. 2000;77:499–506. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(20000601)77:3<499::aid-jcb14>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tsutsumimoto T, Kawasaki S, Ebara S, Takaoka K. TNF-alpha and IL-1beta suppress N-cadherin expression in MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1751–1760. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Debiais F, Lemonnier J, Hay E, Delannoy P, Caverzasio J, Marie PJ. Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) increases N-cadherin expression through protein kinase C and Src-kinase pathways in human calvaria osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2001;81:68–81. doi: 10.1002/1097-4644(20010401)81:1<68::aid-jcb1024>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Delannoy P, Lemonnier J, Hay E, Modrowski D, Marie PJ. Protein kinase C-dependent upregulation of N-cadherin expression by phorbol ester in human calvaria osteoblasts. Exp Cell Res. 2001;269:154–161. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lemonnier J, Hay E, Delannoy P, Lomri A, Modrowski D, Caverzasio J, Marie PJ. Role of N-cadherin and protein kinase C in osteoblast gene activation induced by the S252W fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 mutation in Apert craniosynostosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:832–845. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Marie PJ, Kaabeche K, Guenou H. Roles of FGFR2 and twist in human craniosynostosis: insights from genetic mutations in cranial osteoblasts. Front Oral Biol. 2008;12:144–159. doi: 10.1159/000115036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Le Mee S, Fromigue O, Marie PJ. Sp1/Sp3 and the myeloid zinc finger gene MZF1 regulate the human N-cadherin promoter in osteoblasts. Exp Cell Res. 2005;302:129–142. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hunter I, McGregor D, Robins SP. Caspase-dependent cleavage of cadherins and catenins during osteoblast apoptosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:466–477. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tsuboi M, Kawakami A, Nakashima T, Matsuoka N, Urayama S, Kawabe Y, Fujiyama K, Kiriyama T, Aoyagi T, Maeda K, Eguchi K. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta increase the Fas-mediated apoptosis of human osteoblasts. J Lab Clin Med. 1999;134:222–231. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2143(99)90201-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Radice GL, Rayburn H, Matsunami H, Knudsen KA, Takeichi M, Hynes RO. Developmental defects in mouse embryos lacking N-cadherin. Dev Biol. 1997;181:64–78. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Castro CH, Shin CS, Stains JP, Cheng SL, Sheikh S, Mbalaviele G, Szejnfeld VL, Civitelli R. Targeted expression of a dominant-negative N-cadherin in vivo delays peak bone mass and increases adipogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:2853–2864. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hay E, Laplantine E, Geoffroy V, Frain M, Kohler T, Muller R, Marie PJ. N-cadherin interacts with axin and LRP5 to negatively regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, osteoblast function, and bone formation. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:953–964. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00349-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mbalaviele G, Shin CS, Civitelli R. Cell-cell adhesion and signaling through cadherins: connecting bone cells in their microenvironment. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1821–1827. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Song X, Xie T. DE-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion is essential for maintaining somatic stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 2002;99:14813–14818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232389399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Urbanek K, Cesselli D, Rota M, Nascimbene A, De Angelis A, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Boni A, Bolli R, Kajstura J, Anversa P, Leri A. Stem cell niches in the adult mouse heart. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 2006;103:9226–9231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600635103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhang J, Niu C, Ye L, Huang H, He X, Tong WG, Ross J, Haug J, Johnson T, Feng JQ, Harris S, Wiedemann LM, Mishina Y, Li L. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425:836–841. doi: 10.1038/nature02041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bromberg O, Frisch BJ, Weber JM, Porter RL, Civitelli R, Calvi LM. Osteoblastic N-cadherin is not required for microenvironmental support and regulation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 2012;120:303–313. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-377853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Horikawa K, Radice GL, Takeichi M, Chisaka O. Adhesive subdivisions intrinsic to the epithelial somites. Developmental Biology. 1999;215:182–189. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wan L, Zou W, Gao D, Inuzuka H, Fukushima H, Berg AH, Drapp R, Shaik S, Hu D, Lester C, Eguren M, Malumbres M, Glimcher LH, Wei W. Cdh1 regulates osteoblast function through an APC/C-independent modulation of Smurf1. Mol Cell. 2011;44:721–733. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mbalaviele G, Chen H, Boyce BF, Mundy GR, Yoneda T. The role of cadherin in the generation of multinucleated osteoclasts from mononuclear precursors in murine marrow. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2757–2765. doi: 10.1172/JCI117979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mbalaviele G, Nishimura R, Myoi A, Niewolna M, Reddy SV, Chen D, Feng J, Roodman D, Mundy GR, Yoneda T. Cadherin-6 mediates the heterotypic interactions between the hemopoietic osteoclast cell lineage and stromal cells in a murine model of osteoclast differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:1467–1476. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.6.1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shin CS, Her SJ, Kim JA, Kim DH, Kim SW, Kim SY, Kim HS, Park KH, Kim JG, Kitazawa R, Cheng SL, Civitelli R. Dominant negative N-cadherin inhibits osteoclast differentiation by interfering with beta-catenin regulation of RANKL, independent of cell-cell adhesion. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:2200–2212. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ilvesaro JM, Lakkakorpi PT, Vaananen HK. Inhibition of bone resorption in vitro by a peptide containing the cadherin cell adhesion recognition sequence HAV is due to prevention of sealing zone formation. Exp Cell Res. 1998;242:75–83. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Knudsen KA, Soler AP. Cadherin-mediated cell-cell interactions. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;137:409–440. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-066-7:409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR. Cadherin-mediated cellular signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;15:509–514. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00101-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cavallaro U, Dejana E. Adhesion molecule signalling: not always a sticky business. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:189–197. doi: 10.1038/nrm3068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Daugherty RL, Gottardi CJ. Phospho-regulation of Beta-catenin adhesion and signaling functions. Physiology (Bethesda) 2007;22:303–309. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00020.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Heuberger J, Birchmeier W. Interplay of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and canonical Wnt signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a002915. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781–810. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lilien J, Balsamo J. The regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion by tyrosine phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta-catenin. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nelson WJ, Nusse R. Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 2004;303:1483–1487. doi: 10.1126/science.1094291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Maher MT, Flozak AS, Stocker AM, Chenn A, Gottardi CJ. Activity of the beta-catenin phosphodestruction complex at cell-cell contacts is enhanced by cadherin-based adhesion. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:219–228. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200811108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gumbiner BM. Regulation of cadherin adhesive activity. J Cell Biol. 2000;148:399–404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.3.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gottardi CJ, Gumbiner BM. Adhesion signaling: how beta-catenin interacts with its partners. Curr Biol. 2001;11:R792–794. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00473-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rhee J, Buchan T, Zukerberg L, Lilien J, Balsamo J. Cables links Robo-bound Abl kinase to N-cadherin-bound beta-catenin to mediate Slit-induced modulation of adhesion and transcription. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:883–892. doi: 10.1038/ncb1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bodine PV, Komm BS. Wnt signaling and osteoblastogenesis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006;7:33–39. doi: 10.1007/s11154-006-9002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Krishnan V, Bryant HU, Macdougald OA. Regulation of bone mass by Wnt signaling. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1202–1209. doi: 10.1172/JCI28551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Goltzman D. LRP5, serotonin, and bone: complexity, contradictions, and conundrums. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:1997–2001. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hay E, Buczkowski T, Marty C, Da Nascimento S, Sonnet P, Marie PJ. Peptide-based mediated disruption of N-cadherin-LRP5/6 interaction promotes Wnt signaling and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1852–1863. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Arnsdorf EJ, Tummala P, Jacobs CR. Non-canonical Wnt signaling and N-cadherin related beta-catenin signaling play a role in mechanically induced osteogenic cell fate. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Guntur AR, Rosen CJ, Naski MC. N-cadherin adherens junctions mediate osteogenesis through PI3K signaling. Bone. 2012;50:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hay E, Nouraud A, Marie PJ. N-cadherin negatively regulates osteoblast proliferation and survival by antagonizing Wnt, ERK and PI3K/Akt signalling. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhong Z, Williams BO. Integration of cellular adhesion and Wnt signaling: Interactions between N-cadherin and LRP5 and their role in regulating bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1849–1851. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Salazar V, Norris J, Huang L, Mbalaviele G, Civitelli R. The osteoanabolic offect of systemic Dkk1 inhibition is associated with canonical Lrp5/6 and Erk signaling in bone and is modulated by N-cadherin in osteoblasts. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2010;25 Available at http://www.asbmr.org/Meetings/AnnualMeeting/AbstractDetail.aspx?aid=4b42f47eb-5458-5454eee-5458c5456a-9580bb5878a5479. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Revollo LD, Norris J, Mbalaviele G, Civitelli R. Negative effect of N-Cadherin on the anabolic action of parathyroid hormone (PTH) Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27 Available at http://www.asbmr.org/Meetings/AnnualMeeting/AbstractDetail.aspx?aid=1d257100-259775-257104a257196-257109b257187-a257692d257162e257108f257101f. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES