Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1973 Dec;70(12 Pt 1-2):3546–3550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3546

Relatedness of Mouse Satellite Deoxyribonucleic Acid to Deoxyribonucleic Acid of Various Mus Species

Nancy Reed Rice 1, Neil A Straus 1,*
PMCID: PMC427277  PMID: 4519644

Abstract

Mouse (Mus musculus musculus) satellite DNA is able to reassociate with repeated DNA sequences of Mus caroli and Mus cervicolor, but low thermal stability of the products indicates significant differences between satellite and related DNAs of these two Mus species. There appear to be several satellite-related populations in M. caroli DNA, each of which forms hybrids of low thermal stability with repeated sequences of M. cervicolor DNA. DNAs from the subspecies Mus musculus molossinus and Mus musculus castaneus reassociate with mouse satellite to form hybrids of very high thermal stability, but the satellite content of M. m. musculus DNA is only about 60% that of M. m. musculus DNA. Reassociation of M. m. musculus nonrepeated DNA with M. m. molossinus DNA reveals no detectable differences between them; reassociation with M. caroli (or M. cervicolor) DNA yields a product whose melting temperature depression relative to homologous DNA is about 5°.

Keywords: evolution, Mus musculus, reassociation, repeated sequences

Full text

PDF
3546

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arrighi F. E., Mandel M., Bergendahl J., Hsu T. C. Buoyant densities of DNA of mammals. Biochem Genet. 1970 Jun;4(3):367–376. doi: 10.1007/BF00485753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beattie W. G., Skinner D. M. The diversity of satellite DNAs of Crustacea. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Oct 11;281(2):169–178. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(72)90169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britten R. J., Kohne D. E. Repeated sequences in DNA. Hundreds of thousands of copies of DNA sequences have been incorporated into the genomes of higher organisms. Science. 1968 Aug 9;161(3841):529–540. doi: 10.1126/science.161.3841.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown D. D., Sugimoto K. 5 S DNAs of Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri: evolution of a gene family. J Mol Biol. 1973 Aug 15;78(3):397–415. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90464-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown D. D., Wensink P. C., Jordan E. A comparison of the ribosomal DNA's of Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri: the evolution of tandem genes. J Mol Biol. 1972 Jan 14;63(1):57–73. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90521-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coudray Y., Quetier F., Guille E. New compilation of satellite DNA's. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970 Oct 15;217(2):259–267. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(70)90525-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flamm W. G., McCallum M., Walker P. M. The isolation of complementary strands from a mouse DNA fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Jun;57(6):1729–1734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.6.1729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flamm W. G., Walker P. M., McCallum M. Some properties of the single strands isolated from the DNA of the nuclear satellite of the mouse (Mus musculus). J Mol Biol. 1969 Mar 28;40(3):423–443. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90163-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hennig W., Hennig I., Stein H. Repeated sequences in the DNA of Drosophila and their localization in giant chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1970 Dec 2;32(1):31–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00334010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hennig W., Walker P. M. Variations in the DNA from two rodent families (Cricetidae and Muridae). Nature. 1970 Mar 7;225(5236):915–919. doi: 10.1038/225915a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ingle J., Pearson G. G., Sinclair J. Species distribution and properties of nuclear satellite DNA in higher plants. Nat New Biol. 1973 Apr 18;242(120):193–197. doi: 10.1038/newbio242193a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones K. W. Chromosomal and nuclear location of mouse satellite DNA in individual cells. Nature. 1970 Mar 7;225(5236):912–915. doi: 10.1038/225912a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KIT S. Equilibrium sedimentation in density gradients of DNA preparations from animal tissues. J Mol Biol. 1961 Dec;3:711–716. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(61)80075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Laird C. D., McConaughy B. L., McCarthy B. J. Rate of fixation of nucleotide substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1969 Oct 11;224(5215):149–154. doi: 10.1038/224149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lieberman M. W. Fractionation of mouse DNA in preparative Ag+ -Cs2SO4 gradients. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Oct 26;324(3):309–319. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90277-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maio J. J., Schildkraut C. L. Isolated mammalian metaphase chromosomes. II. Fractionated chromosomes of mouse and Chinese hamster cells. J Mol Biol. 1969 Mar 14;40(2):203–216. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90469-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazrimas J. A., Hatch F. T. A possible relationship between satellite DNA and the evolution of kangaroo rat species (genus Dipodomys). Nat New Biol. 1972 Nov 22;240(99):102–105. doi: 10.1038/newbio240102a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McCarthy B. J., Farquhar M. N. The rate of change of DNA in evolution. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1972;23:1–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pardue M. L., Gall J. G. Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science. 1970 Jun 12;168(3937):1356–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3937.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rice N. R. Change in repeated DNA in evolution. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1972;23:44–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schildkraut C. L., Maio J. J. Studies on the intranuclear distribution and properties of mouse satellite DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Jun 18;161(1):76–93. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(68)90296-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sutton W. D., McCallum M. Related satellite DNA's in the genus Mus. J Mol Biol. 1972 Nov 28;71(3):633–652. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(72)80028-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. VINOGRAD J., MORRIS J., DAVIDSON N., DOVE W. F., Jr The bouyant behavior of viral and bacterial DNA in alkaline CsCl. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Jan 15;49:12–17. doi: 10.1073/pnas.49.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Waring M., Britten R. J. Nucleotide sequence repetition: a rapidly reassociating fraction of mouse DNA. Science. 1966 Nov 11;154(3750):791–794. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3750.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weinberg E. S., Birnstiel M. L., Purdom I. F., Williamson R. Genes coding for polysomal 9S RNA of sea urchins: conservation and divergence. Nature. 1972 Nov 24;240(5378):225–228. doi: 10.1038/240225a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES