Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2014 May 2;35(11):2637–2638. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.027

Fragile X gene expansions are not associated with dementia

Deborah A Hall a, David A Bennett b, Christopher M Filley c,d, Raj C Shah b, Benzi Kluger c, Bichun Ouyang a, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis a,e
PMCID: PMC4273643  NIHMSID: NIHMS608903  PMID: 24958193

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) premutation size expansions in individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) and other cognitive disorders compared to controls. FMR1 genetic screening was completed in patients being seen in a neurobehavioral or AD clinics. Appropriate controls were also collected. A second cohort was a community based, autopsy confirmed, sample of individuals with normal cognitive function, mild cognitive impairment, or AD. There was not an increased frequency of FMR1 expansions in individuals with cognitive disorders, including AD, compared to controls.

Keywords: FMR1, fragile X, Alzheimer disease

Introduction

Trinucleotide repeat expansions (CGG) in the fragile X mental retardation gene 1 (FMR1) gene are associated with neurological signs in both children and adults. Carriers of ‘premutation’ size (55–200 CGG) repeats are at risk for fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS); which is characterized by kinetic tremor, gait ataxia, and executive dysfunction. As FXTAS progresses, more significant cognitive deficits develop; with impairments in verbal comprehension, perceptual organization, working memory, processing speed, and behavioral self-regulation. In comparison to Alzheimer disease (AD), patients with FXTAS have more severe deficits in executive function, but better language performance and attentional control (Seritan et al. 2008). Patients with FXTAS are frequently misdiagnosed with AD (Hall et al. 2005), but, there have been no FMR1 screening studies in primary dementia populations. Individuals who carry a gray zone expansion of 41–54 CGG repeats are frequently ascertained in screening studies and the role of this smaller expansion in association with neurological phenotypes is still to be determined. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of FMR1 expansions in individuals with AD and other cognitive disorders.

Methods

Three separate sources of subjects were tested for this study. Two tertiary care clinics: the Neurobehavior Clinic at the University of Colorado and the Rush Alzheimer Disease Center Memory Clinic supplied patients and controls, and a third group, the Religious Orders Study, supplied older persons with and without dementia. Primarily spousal controls with a mental status examination score >28/30 were recruited from the same clinics and from movement disorders clinics at each university. Genotyping of CGG repeat length in FMR1 was performed using a PCR assay previously described or with a recently developed highly sensitive FMR1 PCR method (Asuragen, Inc., Austin TX).

Results

Clinic-Based Cases and Controls: There was no difference between cases and controls in the frequency of FMR1 premutation expansions (1/151 cases vs. 2/177 controls, p=1) or FMR1 gray zone expansions (10/151 cases vs. 7/177 controls, p=0.28). Religious Orders Study: There were no FMR1 premutation carriers in any of the groups: controls, MCI, or AD. There was no difference in the frequency of FMR1 gray zone expansions between normal controls (3/136, 2.2%), MCI (4/64, 6.2%), and AD (3/68, 4.4%; p=0.29).

Discussion

These results suggest that the frequency of FMR1 expansions is not more common in individuals presenting with memory complaints or AD compared to controls. Only a few studies have evaluated the prevalence of cognitive disorders in association with a FMR1 expansion. A case series reported three of five female FMR1 premutation carriers with dementia or cognitive decline showing pathological changes consistent with AD, in addition to intraneuronal inclusions typically seen in FXTAS (Tassone et al., 2012). A second study reported genotyping 95 individuals with a Huntington disease phenotype who had normal huntingtin gene testing and found only one FMR1 premutation carrier (Rodriguez-Revenga et al., 2008).

There is an activity-dependent regulatory relationship between the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and amyloid precursor protein (APP), which when cleaved, is a major component of cerebral amyloid plaques found in AD (Sokol et al., 2011). This relationship is mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) signaling. In the FMR1 knockout mouse model (>200 CGG repeats); there is loss of FMRP, high basal levels of APP and absence of activity-dependent regulation of APP levels. 11 In FMR1 expansion carriers with less than 200 CGG repeats, FMRP levels remain normal to low normal and any effect on APP would be more subtle. This may explain why we did not see an association between FMR1 premutation expansions and clinically diagnosed or autopsy confirmed AD cases. Based on our results, we conclude that FMR1 premutation size repeat expansions are not a genetic risk factor for AD, but that a larger sample size may be warranted to definitively exclude an association with FMR1 gray zone expansions.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowlegements

This study was funded by the NINDS K23NS052487 (D.H.) and NIA P30AG10161 and R01AG15819 (D.B.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure Statement: There are no potential conflicts of interest for any author related to the research in this article.

References

  1. Hall DA, Berry-Kravis E, Jacquemont S, Rice CD, Cogswell JB, Zhang L. Prior diagnoses given to persons with the Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neurology. 2005;65:299–301. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168900.86323.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Seritan AL, Nguyen DV, Farias ST, et al. Dementia in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS): comparison with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008;147B:1138–1144. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tassone F, Greco CM, Hunsaker MR, et al. Neuropathological, clinical and molecular pathology in female fragile X premutation carriers with and without FXTAS. Genes Brain Behav. 2012 doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00779.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rodriguez-Revenga L, Santos MM, Sanchez A, et al. Screening for FXTAS in 95 Spanish patients negative for Huntington disease. Genetic testing. 2008;12:135–138. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sokol DK, Maloney B, Long JM, Ray B, Lahiri DK. Autism, Alzheimer disease, and fragile X: APP, FMRP, and mGluR5 are molecular links. Neurology. 2011;76:1344–1352. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182166dc7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES