Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct 8;148(1):118–125. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.005

Association of Coffee Intake with Reduced Incidence of Liver Cancer and Death from Chronic Liver Disease in the US Multiethnic Cohort

Veronica Wendy Setiawan 1, Lynne R Wilkens 2, Shelly C Lu 3, Brenda Y Hernandez 2, Loïc Le Marchand 2, Brian E Henderson 1
PMCID: PMC4274222  NIHMSID: NIHMS634103  PMID: 25305507

Abstract

Background & Aims

Coffee consumption has been proposed to reduce risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic liver disease (CLD), but few data are available from prospective, US, multi-ethnic populations. We evaluated the association of coffee intake with HCC and CLD in 162,022 African Americans, Native Hawaiians, Japanese Americans, Latinos, and whites in the US Multiethnic Cohort (MEC).

Methods

We collected data from the MEC, a population-based prospective cohort study of more than 215,000 men and women from Hawaii and California, assembled 1993−1996. Participants reported coffee consumption and other dietary and lifestyle factors when they joined the study. During an 18-year follow up period, there were 451 incident cases of HCC and 654 deaths from CLD. Hazard rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression, adjusting for known HCC risk factors.

Results

High levels of coffee consumption were associated with reduced risk of incident HCC and CLD mortality (Ptrend ≤.0002). Compared to non-coffee drinkers, those who drank 2–3 cups/day had a 38% reduction in risk for HCC (RR=0.62; 95% CI, 0.46−0.84); those who drank ≥4 cups per day had a 41% reduction in HCC risk (RR=0.59; 95% CI, 0.35–0.99). Compared to non-coffee drinkers, participants who consumed 2−3 cups coffee/day had a 46% reduction in risk of death from CLD (RR=0.54; 95% CI, 0.42–0.69) and those who drank ≥4 cups/day had a 71% reduction (RR=0.29; 95% CI, 0.17−0.50). The inverse associations were similar regardless of the participants’ ethnicity, sex, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake, or diabetes status.

Conclusions

Increased coffee consumption reduces the risk of HCC and CLD in multi-ethnic US populations.

Keywords: liver cancer, race, protective, epidemiology

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States (US) has tripled in the past three decades1. The health impact of the increasing incidence of HCC is compounded by its dismal prognosis, with overall 5-year survival <12%2. Among all major cancers in the US, HCC has shown the greatest annual percent increase in mortality rate during 1975–20103. In 2013, HCC was the 7th most common cause of cancer mortality in the US, accounting for more than 21,000 deaths3. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major source of morbidity and mortality4; >30 million Americans have CLD and approximately 31,000 people died each year from it5.

There are marked differences in HCC incidence by race/ethnicity. Asians/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics have the highest incidence rates, at 3-fold and 2-fold higher, respectively, compared to rates among non-Hispanic whites6. The rates for Hispanics and African Americans are also the fastest rising among all racial/ethnic groups6, 7. Hispanics have a CLD rate that is twice that of the white population; they also have more aggressive patterns of disease and overall worse treatment outcomes8. In 2009, CLD was the third leading cause of death for Hispanic men, ages 55–645.

Coffee is a commonly consumed beverage worldwide and it may have beneficial effects on the liver. Coffee consumption has been associated with reduced liver enzymes, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)911. Coffee intake has also been associated with lower severity of liver diseases and lower rates of liver disease progression1214. Epidemiologic studies have suggested that coffee drinking is protective against HCC and CLD1521. However, prospective data in the US minority populations (e.g. African Americans, Hispanics, Asians) are nonexistent16, 19, 21, and thus it is unclear whether coffee is protective against HCC and CLD in these populations.

In this study, we conducted a prospective analysis to examine the association of coffee drinking with the risk of incident HCC and with CLD mortality in more than 160,000 African Americans, Japanese Americans, Latinos, Native Hawaiians, and whites in the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study population

The MEC is an ongoing population-based prospective cohort study with over 215,000 men and women from Hawaii and California (mainly Los Angeles County), assembled between 1993 and 1996. The MEC was established to study dietary, environmental and genetic risk factors for cancer and other chronic diseases. The details of the study design and baseline characteristics have been published22. Briefly, the cohort is comprised predominantly of African Americans, Native Hawaiians, Japanese Americans, Latinos, and Caucasians (aged 45 to 75 years at recruitment). Potential participants were identified primarily through Department of Motor Vehicles drivers’ license, voter registration lists, and Health Care Financing Administration data files. The response rates were highest in Japanese Americans (51.3%), whites (47.0%), and Native Hawaiians (42.2%), and lowest in African Americans (25.5%) and Latinos (21.3%). All participants returned a self-administered baseline questionnaire that obtained information on demographic and lifestyle factors, physical activity, tobacco smoking history, diet, anthropometric measures, personal history of medical conditions, medication use, family history of cancer, as well as reproductive history and hormone use (women only). Between 2001 and 2006, the MEC prospectively collected blood samples from more than 60,000 cohort participants. The Institutional Review Boards at the University of Hawaii and at the University of Southern California approved the study protocol.

Starting with 215,251 participants, we excluded from this analysis participants who were not from the five major ethnic groups (N=13,988), reporting implausible diet based on macronutrient intakes23 (N=8,257) or those with a cancer diagnosis before baseline (N=19,385). We also excluded participants with missing baseline information on coffee intake (N=6,108) and other important covariates (e.g. diabetes, education, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol intake N=5,491). As a result, data on 162,022 participants (24.6% whites, 16.1% African Americans, 7.4% Native Hawaiians, 29.6% Japanese Americans, and 22.3% Latinos) were available for this analysis. Excluded subjects were similar to those who remained in the analyses with respect to age and distribution of HCC risk factors.

Exposure ascertainment

Coffee intake and other dietary information were obtained using a Quantitative FFQ (QFFQ) designed for use in this multiethnic population22. A calibration study of the QFFQ was conducted using three 24 hour recalls from a random subsample of participants selected within sex–racial/ethnic groups and revealed a high correlation between the QFFQ and 24 hour recalls for energy-adjusted nutrients24. The median correlation coefficient for coffee intake as assessed by the QFFQ and the 24 hour recalls was 0.72. Within the baseline QFFQ, participants were asked to indicate the average number of cups of regular and decaffeinated coffee, green tea and black tea consumed per day or per week in the previous year using nine predefined categories: from never/hardly ever to 4 or more times daily. We used information from U.S. Department of Agriculture food composition sources (http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/) to calculate caffeine content in coffee, tea and other caffeine containing food items (e.g. cola beverages, chocolate, etc.). Total caffeine intake (mg/day) was estimated by summing caffeine from regular coffee (137 mg caffeine per cup), regular tea (47 mg caffeine per cup), colas and sodas (46 mg caffeine per can or bottle), chocolate (7 mg caffeine per serving), etc. The food composition tables were maintained by the University of Hawaii Cancer Center22. Data on potential confounders, such as education level, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, smoking status and alcohol intake, were obtained from the baseline questionnaire.

Endpoint ascertainment

Incident HCC cases [International Classification of Diseases for Oncology version 3 topographic (C22.0) and morphology codes (8170–8175)] were identified through annual linkage to the Hawaii Tumor Registry, the Cancer Surveillance Program for Los Angeles County, and the California State Cancer Registry; these cancer registries are part of the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. CLD deaths (ICD-9=571 and ICD-10=K70–K76) within the cohort were determined through annual linkage to state death certificate files in California and Hawaii, and periodic linkage to the National Death Index. The follow up rate in the cohort was 95%; National Death Index information was available for the remaining 5% of the cohort. The majority of CLD deaths in the MEC (>77%) were listed as alcoholic-related diseases and fibrosis/cirrhosis of the liver. Participants who died from HCC were not included in the CLD mortality count as the incident cases were already counted and liver cancer as a death cause was often due to metastasis from another cancer site.

Hepatitis B and C serology

We conducted a nested case-control study of HCC and CLD deaths within the biospecimen subcohort for serological markers of hepatitis B and C infection in blood samples of 210 cases (137 HCC cases and 73 CLD deaths) and 423 controls. All incident cases of HCC and CLD deaths with a pre-diagnostic blood sample were eligible for this case-control study. For each case, two control subjects matched to the index case by sex, race/ethnicity, study area (Hawaii or California), and age at blood draw, were selected from the biospecimen subcohort. Controls also had to be free of HCC on the date of cancer diagnosis or CLD death of the index case. The presence of HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HCV (Architect Assays, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) were tested blindly without regard to case-control status.

Statistical Analysis

Regular coffee intake was categorized into: never, <1 cup daily, 1 cup daily, 2–3 cups daily, and ≥ 4 or more cups daily. Because of limited number of participants who drank decaffeinated coffee, it was categorized into never, ≤ 1 cup daily, and ≥ 2 or more cups daily. Caffeine intake (mg/day) was categorized using quartiles. Hazard rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HCC incidence and CLD deaths associated with coffee intake were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Age (in days) was used as the underlying time variable in the Cox regression starting with a participant’s age at entry (baseline questionnaire completion) and ending with the earliest of these endpoints: date of HCC diagnosis, date of death (from CLD or other causes for non-cases), or end of follow up. The endpoint ascertainment was complete through December 31, 2010 for cancer and December 31, 2012 for death, therefore the end of follow up was set to December 31, 2010 for HCC and December 31, 2012 for CLD analysis. Cox models were adjusted for sex and race/ethnicity (as strata variables) and education (high school graduate or less, some college, college graduate or more), BMI (<25 kg/m2, 25–<30 kg/m2, ≥30 kg/m2), history of diabetes (yes, no), cigarette smoking status (never, former, current), and ethanol intake (0 g/day, <12 g/day, 12–<24 g/day, ≥24 g/day). The proportional hazards assumption was tested by assessing the Schoenfeld residuals and no major violation was observed. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess statistical interaction between coffee intake with smoking status, alcohol drinking, BMI, diabetes, and hepatitis viral infection status with respect to HCC incidence or CLD mortality. The test compares models with the main effect only with models that also include interaction terms for variables of interest. All P-values are two sided. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

After a median 18 years of follow-up, a total of 451 incident cases of HCC (55 whites, 69 African Americans, 32 Native Hawaiians, 152 Japanese Americans, and 143 Latinos) and 654 CLD deaths (166 whites, 83 African Americans, 34 Native Hawaiians, 102 Japanese Americans, and 269 Latinos) were identified during the follow-up period among the 162,022 at-risk cohort participant (Table 1). The mean age of diagnosis for HCC was 71.7 years, ranging from 68.7 years in whites to 73.8 years in Japanese Americans. Latinos had the highest age-adjusted incidence rate of HCC across ethnic groups, followed by Native Hawaiians, Japanese Americans, African Americans, and whites. Compared to whites, the other ethnic groups had at least two-fold higher risk of developing HCC. The mean age of CLD death was 70.7 years, ranging from 68.7 years in African Americans to 75.0 years in Japanese Americans. Latinos also had the highest rate of CLD mortality across ethnic groups, while Japanese Americans had the lowest rate. Compared to whites, Latinos were 1.6-times more likely to die of CLD. The rates in African Americans and Native Hawaiians were similar to that of whites.

Table 1.

Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and chronic liver disease mortality rates in the Multiethnic Cohort

White African American Native Hawaiian Japanese American Latino All
No. at risk participants 39,927 26,071 11,948 47,934 36,142 162,022
No. hepatocellular carcinoma cases 55 69 32 152 143 451
Mean age at diagnosis (SD) 68.7 (8.1) 70.5 (9.0) 71.2 (8.5) 73.8 (8.0) 71.2 (7.0) 71.7 (8.1)
Incidence Rates* 7.9 15.6 20.3 16.7 22.0
Age-adjusted RR (95% CI) 1.00 (ref.) 2.04 (1.43, 2.91) 2.35 (1.52, 3.63) 2.09 (1.50, 2.78) 2.57 (1.88, 3.52)
No. chronic liver disease deaths 166 83 34 102 269 654
Mean age at death (SD) 70.1 (9.1) 68.7 (9.8) 68.9 (9.0) 75.0 (8.4) 70.2 (8.0) 70.7 (8.8)
Mortality rates* 23.8 19.6 20.2 9.8 38.5
Age-adjusted RR (95% CI) 1.00 (ref.) 0.78 (0.60, 1.02) 0.80 (0.55, 1.16) 0.47 (0.37, 0.61) 1.62 (1.34, 1.97)

SD=standard deviation.

*

Per 100,000 and age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population.

Coffee intake ranged from never/hardly ever to four or more cups per day, with the median intake of one cup per day. About 27% of the participants never/hardly ever drank coffee, 19% drank <1 cup/day, 28% drank 1 cup per day, 20% drank 2–3 cups per day, and 5% drank ≥ 4 cups per day (Table 2). High coffee consumption was associated with male sex, white ethnicity, higher education, current smoking status, lower BMI, non-diabetes status, and alcohol drinking (P<0.0001). In the subset of participants with HBV and HCV status, there was no difference in the levels of coffee consumption by viral hepatitis status (P=0.78).

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the at risk cohort participants by coffee intake

Regular Coffee Intake

Characteristics§ Never
N=44,438
<1 cup per day
N=31,056
1 cup per day
N=45,717
2–3 cups per day
N=32,593
≥ 4 cups per day
N=8,218
Age at cohort entry
  Mean (standard deviation) 59.5(9.0) 59.1 (8.8) 60.7 (8.7) 58.1 (8.5) 56.5 (8.0)
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Sex
  Men 18,069 40.7 15,391 49.6 21,009 45.9 16,450 50.5 4,682 57.0
  Women 26,369 59.3 15,665 50.4 24,708 54.1 16,143 49.5 3,536 43.0
Race/ethnicity
  White 11,094 25.0 5,776 18.6 9.895 21.6 9,976 30.6 3,186 38.8
  African American 9,453 21.3 6,033 19.4 6,809 14.9 3,195 9.8 581 7.1
  Native Hawaiian 3,689 8.3 2,537 8.2 3,211 7.0 1,983 6.1 528 6.4
  Japanese American 11,459 25.8 9,088 29.3 14,757 32.3 10,221 31.4 2,409 29.3
  Latino 8,743 19.7 7,622 24.5 11,045 24.2 7,218 22.2 1,514 18.4
Education
  High school graduate or less 18,403 41.4 14,060 45.3 21,813 47.7 12,359 37.9 2,909 35.4
  Some college 13,058 29.4 8,950 28.8 13,363 29.2 10,283 31.6 2,638 32.1
  College graduate or more 12,977 29.2 8,046 25.9 10,541 23.1 9,951 30.5 2,671 32.5
Smoking status
  Never 23,746 53.4 14,765 47.5 19,744 43.2 11,287 34.6 1,685 20.5
  Past 16,314 36.7 12,073 38.9 18,707 40.9 14,056 43.1 3,139 38.2
  Current 4,378 9.9 4,218 13.6 7,266 15.9 7,250 22.2 3,394 41.3
Body mass index (kg/m2)
  <25 18,790 42.3 11,791 38.0 19,433 42.5 13,786 42.3 3,532 43.0
  25–<30 16,267 36.6 12,278 39.5 17,788 38.9 12,980 39.8 3,247 39.5
  ≥ 30 9,381 21.1 6,987 22.5 8,496 18.6 5,827 17.9 1,439 17.5
Diabetes
  No 38,795 87.3 27,308 87.9 40,606 88.8 29,545 90.6 7,546 91.8
  Yes 5,643 12.7 3,748 12.1 5,111 11.2 3,048 9.4 672 8.2
Alcohol (g/day)
  None 27,308 61.5 15,020 48.4 21,138 46.2 13,915 42.7 3,745 45.6
  < 12 11,259 25.3 10,601 34.1 14,211 31.1 10.978 33.7 2,530 30.8
  12–<24 2,398 5.4 2,359 7.6 3,782 8.3 3,146 9.6 716 8.7
  ≥24 3,473 7.8 3,076 9.9 6,586 14.4 4,554 14.0 1,227 14.9
Hepatitis B or C#
  No 125 80.1 87 75.0 171 79.9 88 81.5 21 77.8
  Yes 31 19.9 29 25.0 43 20.1 20 18.5 6 22.2
§

All characteristics were significantly different at P<.0001 across coffee intake categories, except for the hepatitis B or C viral infection (P=0.78), as tested by two-sided χ2 test for categorical measures.

#

Based on the MEC subcohort case-control samples.

Table 3 shows the associations between coffee and caffeine intake and HCC incidence and CLD mortality. The risk for developing HCC decreased with increasing regular coffee (P trend=0.0002), but not with decaffeinated coffee consumption (P trend=0.20). Compared to non-coffee drinkers, individuals who consumed 1 cup, 2–3 cups, and ≥4 cups of coffee per day had a 13% (RR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.11), a 38% (RR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.84) and a 41% (RR=0.59; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.99) reduction in risk of HCC, respectively. Coffee intake was also associated with reduced risk of CLD death (P trend<0.0001). Compared to non-consumers, those who consumed 1 cup of coffee daily had a 15% reduction in risk of CLD death (RR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.04), those who had 2–3 cups daily had a 46% reduction (RR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.42 0.69), and those who had ≥4 cups daily had a 71% reduction (RR=0.29; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.50). Decaffeinated coffee intake was also inversely associated with CLD (P trend<0.0001). The risk reductions for HCC and CLD associated with coffee drinking were similar between men and women (P interaction ≥0.34). Caffeine was associated with HCC and CLD in the age-, sex-, and ethnicity-adjusted models, but after regular coffee was included as a covariate, the association was no longer statistically significant. This was expected, as coffee and caffeine were highly correlated. Intakes of other caffeine containing beverages such as green and black tea were not associated with HCC incidence or CLD mortality (data not shown).

Table 3.

Association of coffee and caffeine intake with hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and chronic liver disease mortality in the Multiethnic Cohort

No.
Cases
Person Years RR* (95% CI) RR** (95% CI)
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Regular coffee (cups/day)
  Never 119 665,161 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
  < 1 111 466,122 1.18 (0.91, 1.53) 1.14 (0.88, 1.48)
  1 137 683,898 0.97 (0.76, 1.24) 0.87 (0.67, 1.11)
  2–3 67 499,003 0.73 (0.54, 0.99) 0.62 (0.46, 0.84)
  ≥ 4 17 125,473 0.81 (0.48, 1.34) 0.59 (0.35, 0.99)
  P trend 0.03 0.0002
Decaffeinated coffee (cups/day)
  Never 287 1,517,706 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
  ≤ 1 128 706,852 0.93 (0.75, 1.14) 0.87 (0.70, 1.08)
  ≥ 2 21 113,110 0.96 (0.62, 1.50) 0.86 (0.55, 1.34)
  P trend 0.54 0.20
Quartiles of caffeine intake (mg/day)
  0–<51.76 113 604,036 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
  51.76–<140.37 137 606,866 1.16 (0.91, 1.49) 1.04 (0.78, 1.39)
  140.37–<326.15 118 608,780 0.99 (0.76, 1.29) 0.92 (0.64, 1.32)
  ≥326.15 83 619,975 0.76 (0.57, 1.02) 0.72 (0.36, 1.44)
  P trend 0.04 0.45
Chronic Liver Disease
Regular coffee (cups/day)
  Never 184 714,697 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
  < 1 163 501,530 1.20 (0.97, 1.48) 1.14 (0.92, 1.41)
  1 202 733,422 0.99 (0.81, 1.21) 0.85 (0.69, 1.04)
  2–3 91 535,769 0.64 (0.49, 0.82) 0.54 (0.42, 0.69)
  ≥ 4 14 134,527 0.40 (0.23, 0.70) 0.29 (0.17, 0.50)
  P trend <0.0001 <0.0001
Decaffeinated coffee (cups/day)
  Never 441 1,628,980 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
  ≤ 1 156 759,666 0.74 (0.62, 0.89) 0.71 (0.59, 0.85)
  ≥ 2 21 121,735 0.58 (0.37, 0.90) 0.54 (0.35, 0.85)
  P trend 0.0001 <0.0001
Quartiles of caffeine intake (mg/day)
  0–<51.76 165 648,897 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
  51.76–<140.37 209 651,811 1.20 (0.98, 1.48) 1.09 (0.87, 1.38)
  140.37–<326.15 172 653,736 0.98 (0.79, 1.21) 0.95 (0.71, 1.27)
  ≥326.15 108 665,501 0.63 (0.49, 0.81) 0.98 (0.57, 1.67)
P trend <0.0001 0.72
*

Adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

**

Further adjusted for education (high school graduate or less, some college, college graduate or more), BMI (<25, 25–<30, ≥ 30 kg/m2), alcohol intake (0, <12, 12–<24, ≥24 ethanol g/day), smoking status (never, former, current), and diabetes (no/yes). For decaffeinated coffee and caffeine intake, additionally adjusted for regular coffee intake (Never, <1 cup/day, 1 cup/day, 2–3 cups/day, ≥ 4 cups/day).

The associations between coffee and HCC incidence and CLD death by race/ethnicity are presented in Table 4. Increasing coffee intake, particularly ≥ 2 cups per day, was associated with reduced HCC incidence and CLD mortality in most ethnic groups, with no significant heterogeneity observed (P interaction ≥ 0.35).

Table 4.

Association of regular coffee intake with hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and chronic liver disease mortality by race/ethnicity

White African American Native Hawaiian Japanese American Latino

Coffee Intake
(cups/day)
Cases RR* (95% CI) Cases RR* (95% CI) Cases RR* (95% CI) Cases RR* (95% CI) Cases RR* (95% CI) P heterogeneity
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Never 18 1.00 (ref.) 18 1.00 (ref.) 10 1.00 (ref.) 41 1.00 (ref.) 32 1.00 (ref.) 0.63
<1 11 0.98 (0.46, 2.09) 22 1.54 (0.82, 2.89) 7 0.89 (0.34, 2.37) 36 1.04 (0.66, 1.63) 35 1.18 (0.73, 1.91)
1 15 0.77 (0.38, 1.55) 18 1.06 (0.55, 2.05) 13 0.98 (0.42, 2.30) 49 0.76 (0.50, 1.16) 42 0.90 (0.57, 1.44)
≥ 2 11 0.36 (0.17, 0.77) 11 1.03 (0.48, 2.20) 2 0.19 (0.04, 0.87) 26 0.51 (0.31, 0.84) 34 0.90 (0.55, 1.47)
P trend 0.008 0.86 0.07 0.004 0.44
Chronic Liver Disease
Never 55 1.00 (ref.) 28 1.00 (ref.) 8 1.00 (ref.) 24 1.00 (ref.) 69 1.00 (ref.) 0.35
<1 33 0.98 (0.64, 1.52) 23 1.13 (0.65, 1.98) 8 1.27 (0.47, 3.41) 21 1.09 (0.60, 1.96) 78 1.25 (0.90, 1.73)
1 38 0.57 (0.37, 0.87) 27 1.09 (0.64, 1.86) 13 1.39 (0.56, 3.44) 40 1.05 (0.63, 1.76) 84 0.85 (0.62, 1.17)
≥ 2 40 0.45 (0.30, 0.68) 5 0.32 (0.12, 0.84) 5 0.73 (0.23, 2.29) 17 0.58 (0.30, 1.09) 38 0.47 (0.31, 0.70)
P trend <0.0001 0.09 0.78 0.14 <0.0001
*

Adjusted for age, sex, education (high school graduate or less, some college, college graduate or more), BMI (<25, 25–<30, ≥ 30 kg/m2), alcohol intake (0, <12, 12–<24, ≥24 ethanol g/day), smoking status (never, former, current), and diabetes (no/yes).

We conducted a sensitivity analysis by excluding HCC cases (N=45) or CLD deaths (N=75) occurring within 2 years after cohort entry. The inverse associations between coffee intake and risk of incident HCC (P trend=0.002) and CLD death (P trend<0.0001) remained statistically significant. Compared to participants who did not drink coffee, those who drank ≥ 2 cups daily had a 33% reduction in risk of HCC (RR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.90) and a 46% reduction in risk of CLD death (RR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.69).

We also examined whether associations of coffee intake with incident HCC and CLD mortality varied by known risk factors, and found no significant interaction between coffee intake and smoking status, alcohol intake, diabetes, and hepatitis viral infection status for CLD and HCC (all Ps for interaction ≥ 0.11).

DISCUSSION

In this prospective cohort of multiethnic US populations, we found that increasing coffee consumption was associated, in a dose-dependent manner, with lower risks of incident HCC and mortality from CLD. Compared to individuals who did not drink coffee, those who drank 2–3 cups per day had a 38% reduction in risk of HCC and a 46% reduction in risk of CLD death, and those who drank ≥4 cups per day had a 41% reduction in risk of HCC and a 71% reduction in risk of CLD death. While the numbers of cases in certain ethnic groups were small, the protective association was consistent across ethnic groups. Furthermore, the inverse association was observed across different categories of known HCC risk factors (i.e. smoking, alcohol drinking, BMI, diabetes).

Our study is the first prospective analysis of coffee consumption and HCC risk in multiple US racial/ethnic populations. Our results are consistent with previous studies showing inverse associations between coffee intake and HCC15, 17, 19 and CLD17, 18, 25 and further support the hypothesis that coffee may protect against the development of CLD and HCC. The exact mechanisms by which coffee exerts its protective effects on the liver are unknown. Coffee has been associated with lower liver enzymes911 and slower progression of liver diseases1214. Coffee has also been inversely associated with diabetes26, 27, a risk factor for HCC28 and other liver diseases29, suggesting that coffee may be beneficial to the liver by reducing insulin resistance and improving glucose metabolism26. Further adjustment for diabetes in our study, however, had little effect on the coffee-HCC association.

There are thousands of compounds in coffee, including caffeine, diterpenes, potassium, niacin, magnesium, and the antioxidants chlorogenic acids and tocopherols30. The most studied coffee constituents in relation to liver function and health are caffeine, diterpenes (e.g. cafestol and kahweol), and chlorogenic acids30. The potential chemopreventive effects and molecular mechanisms of these bioactive compounds against cancers and liver diseases have been discussed in detail in previous studies16, 30, 31. Which coffee constituents are hepato-protective, however, remain elusive.

Our study has several strengths and limitations. The strengths include its prospective design which minimizes temporal ambiguity and excludes the possibility of recall bias, long follow-up time which permits lag-time analysis to assess reverse causality, multiethnic and large sample size, and comprehensive baseline risk factor data which allow for confounder adjustment in the analysis. The limitations include coffee intake assessment by self-report at baseline which may not reflect long-term pattern of consumption. Among the participants who responded to the follow up questionnaire administered between 2003 and 2008 and reported coffee consumption (N=87,387), the intraclass correlation coefficient between the baseline and the follow up questionnaires was 0.60. This imperfect correlation reflects potential exposure misclassification due to measurement error, which might have attenuated the observed associations. Another limitation is the lack of information on liver disease other than HCC at baseline. The observed inverse associations, however, remained after lag analyses suggesting that reverse causality was an unlikely explanation for our findings. Low recruitment rates in some of the MEC ethnic groups may affect the generalizability of our results to the general population. As previously shown, however, the distribution of education level in our cohort generally resemble those reported by the U.S. census in Hawaii and Los Angeles County for the same ethnic and age groups22; thus, we believe that findings from this cohort are broadly generalizable. Finally, baseline data on HBV and HCV status were unavailable for most cohort participants; consequently we were unable to adjust for any effect of viral hepatitis on the association between coffee and HCC/CLD. However, in the subset of MEC participants with HBV and HCV information, there was no difference in the levels of coffee consumption by viral hepatitis status.

In summary, this large prospective cohort study showed that coffee consumption reduces the risk of developing HCC and mortality from CLD in African Americans, Japanese Americans, Native Hawaiians, Latinos, and whites. Further studies are warranted to clarify the protective role of specific constituents in coffee in the development of liver disease and its related mortality.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the MEC participants for their participation and commitment. We thank Ms. Jacqueline Porcel for her assistance in the analysis. This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA164973 and CA186203.

Abbreviations

BMI

body mass index

CI

confidence interval

CLD

chronic liver disease

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

RR

relative risk

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interest: the authors have nothing to disclose.

Author contributions: study concept and design (VWS); acquisition of data (BEH, LLM, LRW); analysis and interpretation (VWS, BYH, LRW); drafting of the manuscript (VWS, BYH, LRW, LLM, BEH, SCL); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (VWS, LRW, BYH, SCL, LLM, BEH) ; statistical analysis (VWS, LRW); obtained funding (VWS, BEH, LLM).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1485–1491. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consider the Population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2013. Apr, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/, based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kemmer N, Neff GW. Ethnic variations in chronic liver diseases. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1339–1344. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9992-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62:1–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? Hepatology. 2014 doi: 10.1002/hep.27222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.El-Serag HB, Lau M, Eschbach K, et al. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Hispanics in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1983–1989. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.18.1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carrion AF, Ghanta R, Carrasquillo O, et al. Chronic liver disease in the Hispanic population of the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:834–841. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.027. quiz e109-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klatsky AL, Morton C, Udaltsova N, et al. Coffee, cirrhosis, and transaminase enzymes. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1190–1195. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.11.1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nakanishi N, Nakamura K, Nakajima K, et al. Coffee consumption and decreased serum gamma-glutamyltransferase: a study of middle-aged Japanese men. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16:419–423. doi: 10.1023/a:1007683626665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Coffee and caffeine consumption reduce the risk of elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activity in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:24–32. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Molloy JW, Calcagno CJ, Williams CD, et al. Association of coffee and caffeine consumption with fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and degree of hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology. 2012;55:429–436. doi: 10.1002/hep.24731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Modi AA, Feld JJ, Park Y, et al. Increased caffeine consumption is associated with reduced hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology. 2010;51:201–209. doi: 10.1002/hep.23279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Freedman ND, Everhart JE, Lindsay KL, et al. Coffee intake is associated with lower rates of liver disease progression in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2009;50:1360–1369. doi: 10.1002/hep.23162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larsson SC, Wolk A. Coffee consumption and risk of liver cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1740–1745. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saab S, Mallam D, Cox GA, 2nd, et al. Impact of coffee on liver diseases: a systematic review. Liver Int. 2014;34:495–504. doi: 10.1111/liv.12304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lai GY, Weinstein SJ, Albanes D, et al. The association of coffee intake with liver cancer incidence and chronic liver disease mortality in male smokers. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1344–1351. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Coffee and tea consumption are associated with a lower incidence of chronic liver disease in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1928–1936. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bravi F, Bosetti C, Tavani A, et al. Coffee reduces risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1413–1421. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goh GB, Chow WC, Wang R, et al. Coffee, alcohol and other beverages in relation to cirrhosis mortality: The Singapore Chinese Health Study. Hepatology. 2014 doi: 10.1002/hep.27054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sang LX, Chang B, Li XH, et al. Consumption of coffee associated with reduced risk of liver cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:346–357. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nothlings U, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, et al. Flavonols and pancreatic cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:924–931. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stram DO, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, et al. Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:358–370. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tverdal A, Skurtveit S. Coffee intake and mortality from liver cirrhosis. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13:419–423. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(02)00462-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, Chen M, et al. Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:569–586. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huxley R, Lee CM, Barzi F, et al. Coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and tea consumption in relation to incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2053–2063. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang P, Kang D, Cao W, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28:109–122. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Picardi A, D'Avola D, Gentilucci UV, et al. Diabetes in chronic liver disease: from old concepts to new evidence. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006;22:274–283. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Torres DM, Harrison SA. Is it time to write a prescription for coffee? Coffee and liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:670–672. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bohn SK, Blomhoff R, Paur I. Coffee and cancer risk, epidemiological evidence, and molecular mechanisms. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58:915–930. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES