Skip to main content
PMC home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2014 Dec 7;2014:324307. doi: 10.1155/2014/324307

Vinpocetine and Pyritinol: A New Model for Blood Rheological Modulation in Cerebrovascular Disorders—A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Hayder M Alkuraishy 1,*, Ali I Al-Gareeb 1, Ali K Albuhadilly 2
PMCID: PMC4274818  PMID: 25548768

Abstract

Blood and plasma viscosity are the major factors affecting blood flow and normal circulation. Whole blood viscosity is mainly affected by plasma viscosity, red blood cell deformability/aggregation and hematocrit, and other physiological factors. Thirty patients (twenty males + ten females) with age range 50–65 years, normotensive with history of cerebrovascular disorders, were selected according to the American Heart Stroke Association. Blood viscosity and other rheological parameters were measured after two-day abstinence from any medications. Dual effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol exhibit significant effects on all hemorheological parameters (P < 0.05), especially on low shear whole blood viscosity (P < 0.01), but they produced insignificant effects on total serum protein and high shear whole blood viscosity (P > 0.05). Therefore, joint effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol improve blood and plasma viscosity in patients with cerebrovascular disorders.

1. Introduction

Blood and plasma viscosity are the major factors affecting blood flow and normal circulation, so the whole blood viscosity is chiefly affected by plasma viscosity, red blood cell deformability, hematocrit, and other physiological factors. Moreover, increase in the blood viscosity was associated with development of multiple disorders via damaging the vascular endothelium; thus, there is a positive correlation between blood viscosity and cerebrovascular disorders [1].

Plasma viscosity has Newtonian fluid properties and depends mainly on plasma protein, while blood viscosity has non-Newtonian fluid property and depends primarily on red cell deformability and hematocrit [2].

Consequently, blood viscosity is considerably higher in patients with cerebrovascular disorders due to higher hematocrit and also development of atherosclerosis caused by hyperviscosity; thus, unusual raise in blood viscosity was linked to progression of vascular complications; moreover, high blood viscosity correlated with infarct size and augment of the risk of mortality [3, 4]. Furthermore, increase in the blood viscosity induces endothelial damage, inflammation, vascular wall hypertrophy, platelet aggregation, and deterioration in the blood vessels shear stress; all these factors increase risks of stroke and cardiac ischemia [5].

Therefore, whole blood viscosity was regarded as acute phase marker expecting cardiac and cerebral disorders, so blood and plasma viscosity are a rapid simple test to predict the occurrences of disease and thus, a rapid elevation of blood viscosity was connected with twofold increase in death risk [6].

Vinpocetine (ethylapovincaminate) derived from Vinca minor and periwinkle leaves has been extensively used in the management of cerebrovascular disorders via increase in cerebral blood flow, neuroprotection, and improvement of memory functions [7]. Specifically, vinpocetine acts via the following mechanisms [8–11]:

  1. blocking voltage sensitive Na+ channels leading to intracellular decreasing of Na+ and Ca+ ions which are responsible for ischemic induced excitotoxicity;

  2. inhibition of cGMP phosphodiesterase and thus increase of cGMP in vascular endothelium causing vasodilation;

  3. activation of peripheral benzodiazepine receptors which are involved in neuroprotection;

  4. anti-inflammation and antioxidation, thus preventing rise in blood viscosity;

  5. modulation of mitochondrial transition pore leading to cardiovascular protection;

  6. protection from glutamate-induced neurotoxicity.

All these mechanisms of vinpocetine pointed to the protection effects of vinpocetine that are used in prevention of vascular disorders caused via blood and plasma hyperviscosity; also vinpocetine improves brain perfusion through cerebral vasodilation without affecting the cardiovascular resistance; thus, it prevents deleterious neurotoxic effect of hyperviscosity [12].

Also, cGMP reduced in erythrocyte during hyperviscosity; thus, cGMP induced by vinpocetine in addition to vasodilator effect might modulate blood viscosity [13].

Pyritinol is an analogue to pyridoxine but does not produce any action of pyridoxine; it is nootropic via unknown mechanism, but it exerts several effects [14–16]:

  1. augmentation of cerebral cholinergic system, thus improving memory function;

  2. antioxidant effect and potent free radical scavenger, thus preventing development of blood viscosity;

  3. vasodilator and improving of cellular glucose metabolism;

  4. enhancing of white blood cell survival and migration;

  5. prevention of cell membrane protein polymerization, especially neuronal and erythrocyte membranes.

Because of these findings, our hypothesis was that the vinpocetine and/or pyritinol improve blood viscosity; therefore, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of vinpocetine and/or pyritinol on blood viscosity.

2. Patients and Methods

The present study was accomplished in Al-Mustansiriya University, College of Medicine, Departments of Pharmacology and Internal Medicine, in cooperation with Clinical Laboratory Unit in Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital, Bagdad, Iraq, during March of 2014. The clinical study was permitted via confined logical scientific team foundation. Thirty patients (twenty males + ten females) with age range 50–65 years, normotensive with history of cerebrovascular disorders, were selected according to the American Heart Stroke Association Diagnostic Criteria [17] for this clinical study; sixteen of them were smokers and diabetics. Blood viscosity and other rheological parameters were measured after two-day abstinence from any medications except antidiabetic agents. Then the patients were divided into three groups:

Group A: ten patients take vinpocetine 10 mg/day;

Group B: ten patients take pyritinol 100 mg/day;

Group C: ten patients take vinpocetine 10 mg plus pyritinol 100 mg daily.

After two weeks of therapy 10 mL venous blood was taken for measurement of blood viscosity and other parameters. These are the following:

  •  

    hematocrit measurement: HCT haematocrit regarded as the red material in blood HCT g/L measured by microhematocrit tube at 10000/minutes RPM for five minutes [18];

  •  

    total serum protein (TP) g/dL measured by automated analyzer (Nephstar Plus three-channel protein analyzer, Yima Opto-Electrical Technology Co. Ltd.) [19];

  •  

    serum fibrinogen measured by Fibrinogen Human ELISA Kit (ab108841) [20];

  •  

    measurement of blood viscosity, whole blood viscosity (WBV) [21–24]: measured by capillary viscometer (0.9 mm diameter, 51720/111 Schott-Gerate type) in relation to distilled water viscosity;

  •  

    relative viscosity = flow time of blood (sec)/flow time of D.W sec;

  •  

    actual viscosity = relative viscosity − D.W viscosity;

  •  

    D.W viscosity = 0.9615 cP;

  •  

    high shear rate: WBV = (0.12 × HCT%) + 0.17(TPg/dL−2.07);

  •  

    low shear rate: WBV = (1.89 × HCT%) + 3.76(TPg/L−78.42);

  •  

    kinematic viscosity (v) = actual blood viscosity (η)/blood density (p)[25, 26];

  •  

    blood density = 1.060 kg/m3 at 37°C;

  •  

    kinematic viscosity: fluid viscosity without force references;

  •  

    RBC rigidity index (RRI) = blood viscosity/plasma viscosity [27];

  •  

    plasma viscosity measured by low shear 30 viscometers at shear rate of 69.5 s−1 (automated viscometer);

drugs used in this clinical study: vinpocetine (cavinton tablet 10 mg, ASIA Pharmaceutical Industries) and pyritinol (encephabol tablet 100 mg, Merck KGaA & Co Werk Spittal, Hosslglasse 9800 Spittal/Drau, Austria);

  •  

    statistical evaluation and significance between the different groups: done via using Student's t-test when the P value was less than 0.05, and the data were expressed as mean ± SD.

3. Results

Vinpocetine significantly improves the serum fibrinogen, blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, kinematic viscosity, and erythrocyte rigidity index (P < 0.05), but it produced highly significant effect on low shear whole blood viscosity (P < 0.01), while vinpocetine effects on hematocrit, total serum protein, and high shear whole blood viscosity were insignificant in comparison with pretreatment values (P > 0.05, Table 1).

Table 1.

Rheological properties of oral vinpocetine 10 mg/day for two weeks in cerebrovascular disorders.

Variables Before After P value
Hematocrit % 45.7 ± 0.23 44.2 ± 0.45 P > 0.05
Total serum protein g/dl 8.64 ± 0.21 8.15 ± 1.76 P > 0.05
Fibrinogen g/l 3.78 ± 0.87 2.01 ± 0.08 P < 0.05
Relative blood viscosity cP 4.33 ± 0.65 2.11 ± 0.03 P < 0.05
Actual blood viscosity cP 3.3685 ± 0.021 1.148 ± 0.032 P < 0.05
WBV-HSR cP 6.6009 ± 0.032 6.337 ± 0.011 P > 0.05
WBV-LSR cP 116.377 ± 0.165 97.935 ± 2.23 P < 0.01
RRI 2.17 ± 0.011 1.17 ± 0.087 P < 0.05
Plasma viscosity cP 1.55 ± 0.06 0.98 ± 0.08 P < 0.05
Kinematic viscosity 3.18 ± 0.17 1.083 ± 0.64 P < 0.05
Open in a new tab

WBV-HSR: whole blood viscosity high shear rate, WBV-LSR: whole blood viscosity low shear rate, and RRI: RBC rigidity index.

Pyritinol oral therapy 100 mg/day for two weeks showed significant effects on blood viscosity and plasma viscosity (P < 0.05) and highly significant effect on the low shear whole blood viscosity, while it produced insignificant effects on other rheological parameters (P > 0.05, Table 2).

Table 2.

Rheological properties of oral pyritinol 100 mg/day for two weeks in cerebrovascular disorders.

Variables Before After P value
Hematocrit % 45.7 ± 0.23 45.6 ± 0.76 P > 0.05
Total serum protein g/dl 8.64 ± 0.21 8.55 ± 1.39 P > 0.05
Fibrinogen g/l 3.78 ± 0.87 3.65 ± 0.071 P > 0.05
Relative blood viscosity cP 4.33 ± 0.65 3.11 ± 0.29 P < 0.05
Actual blood viscosity cP 3.3685 ± 0.021 2.1485 ± 0.038 P < 0.05
WBV-HSR cP 6.6009 ± 0.032 5.472 ± 0.08 P > 0.05
WBV-LSR cP 116.377 ± 0.165 86.184 ± 0.032 P < 0.01
RRI 2.17 ± 0.011 2.17 ± 0.036 P > 0.05
Plasma viscosity cP 1.55 ± 0.06 0.99 ± 0.05 P < 0.05
Kinematic viscosity 3.18 ± 0.17 3.17 ± 0.07 P > 0.05
Open in a new tab

WBV-HSR: whole blood viscosity high shear rate, WBV-LSR: whole blood viscosity low shear rate, and RRI: RBC rigidity index.

Joint effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol (vinpocetine 10 mg/day plus pyritinol 100 mg/day) were shown on all hemorheological parameters (P < 0.05), especially on low shear whole blood viscosity (P < 0.01), but there are insignificant effects on total serum protein and high shear whole blood viscosity (P > 0.05, Table 3).

Table 3.

Dual combined effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol on hemorheological parameters in cerebrovascular disorders.

Variables Before After P value
Hematocrit % 45.7 ± 0.23 43.1 ± 0.65 P < 0.05
Total serum protein g/dl 8.64 ± 0.21 8.12 ± 2.76 P > 0.05
Fibrinogen g/l 3.78 ± 0.87 1.99 ± 0.09 P < 0.05
Relative blood viscosity cP 4.33 ± 0.65 1.98 ± 0.02 P < 0.01
Actual blood viscosity cP 3.3685 ± 0.021 1.0185 ± 0.45 P < 0.05
WBV-HSR cP 6.6009 ± 0.032 5.172 ± 0.026 P > 0.05
WBV-LSR cP 116.377 ± 0.165 81.45918 ± 2.23 P < 0.01
RRI 2.17 ± 0.011 1.75 ± 0.03 P < 0.05
Plasma viscosity cP 1.55 ± 0.06 0.58 ± 0.006 P < 0.05
Kinematic viscosity 3.18 ± 0.17 0.960 ± 0.002 P < 0.01
Open in a new tab

WBV-HSR: whole blood viscosity high shear rate, WBV-LSR: whole blood viscosity low shear rate, and RRI: RBC rigidity index.

Regarding the gender differences in RRI (red blood cell rigidity index), in males (number 20) and females (number 10), there are differences in gender response to vinpocetine and/or pyritinol therapy, but this difference in RRI did not reach the level of significance (P < 0.05), except the combined vinpocetine and pyritinol which showed significant effect (P < 0.05, Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Gender differences in RBS rigidity index (RRI) in responses to the vinpocetine and/or pyritinol.

4. Discussion

The significance of blood rheological factors like whole blood viscosity, erythrocyte sedimentation, erythrocyte deformability, fibrinogen, and hematocrit in the progression of cerebrovascular damage has been established and thus elevation of hemorheological parameters caused cerebral hypoperfusion via blighted brain microcirculation [28]. Elevation in whole blood viscosity decreases blood flow and causes vascular occlusions; also, red blood cells form 99% of all blood cells and they are normally deformable which allows them to adapt during different circulation conditions, but when erythrocyte turns into nondeformable status the whole blood viscosity elevates [29, 30].

Commencing this universal explanation it will be apparent that the erythrocyte and hematocrit are principal regulators and determinants of whole blood viscosity; also low shear whole blood viscosity is related to erythrocyte deformability, while high shear whole blood viscosity is proportionally related to the hematocrit and fibrinogen levels [31]; this may explain the highly significant effects of vinpocetine and/or pyritinol on reduction of low shear whole blood viscosity via enhancement of erythrocyte deformability, regarding the high shear whole blood viscosity; vinpocetine but not pyritinol decreases fibrinogen without affecting hematocrit; therefore vinpocetine and pyritinol have shown insignificant effects on high shear blood viscosity when they were used alone or in combination which might be due to inability of any one of them to reduce hematocrit.

This study showed that vinpocetine significantly improves the blood viscosity at low shear type, reduced fibrinogen level, and improves kinematic viscosity and erythrocyte rigidity. All these effects lead to the augmentation of cerebral blood flow and increase in brain perfusion and oxygen supply in normal healthy cerebral area and around ischemic area in stroke patients; these effects are mainly related to the reduction in whole blood viscosity and induction of erythrocyte deformability.

The mechanical stress as in atherosclerosis and inflammatory conditions causes an increase in the ca+ entry into erythrocyte leading to reduction in deformability property of erythrocyte; this leads to elevating the blood viscosity; since vinpocetine inhibits Na+-dependent Ca+ channels at erythrocyte membrane like the effect of verapamil, vinpocetine enhances the erythrocyte deformability. Moreover, erythrocytes deformability was linked via stimulation of cGMP pathway which was augmented by vinpocetine [32].

Furthermore, drugs that inhibit the phosphodiesterase enzyme (PDE) like pentoxifylline improve blood viscosity via amelioration of erythrocyte deformability; thus vinpocetine reduced the erythrocytes aggregations through cGMP-dependent pathway leading to the improvement in erythrocyte deformability [33].

Muravyov et al.'s 2011 study showed that the administration of pentoxifylline for four-week duration of therapy improves the blood viscosity via activation of phosphodiesterase pathway like the effect of vinpocetine [34].

Moreover, vinpocetine is regarded as antioxidant via free radical scavenger and inhibition of membrane lipid peroxidation of erythrocyte; also, statins and other antioxidants like vinpocetine improve erythrocytes deformability and ameliorate the central and peripheral hemorheological properties [35, 36]; thus antioxidant effect of vinpocetine may produce a potential effect in reduction of blood viscosity.

It is well known that fibrinogen elevates blood flow resistance at microcirculation; as a result the non-Newtonian property of blood will reduce causing elevation in the blood viscosity and decrease in the blood flow; in spite of collateral circulation being frequently present, the oxygen supply and extraction are blighted also; fibrinogen increases risk of viscosity-induced thromboembolic disorders which was resistant to anticoagulant action; also anticoagulant is ineffective in reduction or amelioration of hyperviscosity [37].

Blood viscosity was higher at morning; this circadian rhythm is due to higher fibrinogen level at morning which explained the higher rate of stroke at morning [38]; this also explained why we do this study at morning to evaluate the maximum level of blood viscosity and evaluate the higher potential effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol.

Chronic diabetic hyperglycemia inhibits erythrocyte membrane protein kinase leading to loss of erythrocyte deformability causing diabetic vascular complications and elevation in the blood viscosity; also high blood glucose seen in diabetes mellitus is identified to have a harmful consequence on red blood cells arrangement and rheological uniqueness, which were ultimately donated for diabetic complications [39].

Moreover, diabetes-induced hyperglycemia causes reduction in plasma PH, and this reduction in PH leads to increase in the erythrocyte rigidity; therefore, it was proposed that the erythrocyte rigidity augmented chiefly via hyperglycemia and acidity, thus increasing erythrocyte trapping and rising in blood flow resistance which per se elevates the blood viscosity [40]. Therefore, in the present study approximately half of the patients were diabetic and both vinpocetine and pyritinol improve blood viscosity via improving erythrocyte deformability, so vinpocetine or pyritinol may be of significance in reduction of diabetes-induced hyperviscosity and improvement of erythrocyte deformability derangements.

Gender differences in blood viscosity related to the erythrocyte rigidity and aging. There are major dissimilarities among males and young females at reproductive period in whole blood viscosity, and numerous studies previously showed that high hematocrit and blood viscosity were significantly correlated with male cerebrovascular disorders because of female menstruations, so there are significant gender differences in all viscosity parameters and hematocrit leading to lower blood viscosity in female [41].

Approximately 0.8% of total red blood cell reformed per day, and 80% of female erythrocytes were younger; this leads to lower erythrocyte rigidity in female in comparison with male and different studies illustrate that elevated blood viscosity increases the erythrocyte aggregation and inhibits erythrocyte deformability. Moreover, aged erythrocyte disturbed microcirculations and released hemoglobin from erythrocyte which cause nitric oxide depletion that leads to vasoconstriction and then decreases nitric oxide augment platelet activation and thrombosis, and this explained the lower levels of nitric oxide in male [42], so most of these studies coincide with our results which showed lower erythrocyte rigidity index in female in comparison with male; also the present study showed gender differences in therapeutics response toward vinpocetine and/or pyritinol.

Pyritinol improves blood viscosity via elevation of erythrocyte ATP which increases deformability and reduces the erythrocyte rigidity; thus acute high dose of pyritinol increases blood ATP in about 20%; also it increases erythrocyte cGMP, improves glucose metabolism, and augments acetylcholine-induced vasodilatation [43].

Therefore, the present study showed significant improvement in blood viscosity in addition to the amelioration of plasma viscosity which may be through ATP activation, but unfortunately level of ATP is not measured in this study due to limited facilities.

Erythrocytes enclosed considerable amounts of ATP formed via glycolysis pathway and in response to hypoxia, acidosis, and mechanical deformability, the erythrocytes release ATP sufficient for creation and stimulation of vascular endothelial purinergic receptors which induced nitric oxide and prostacyclin release causing vasodilation, but erythrocyte ATP efflux needs specific ion channels that are stimulated via pyritinol. Many studies showed that the erythrocyte participation in nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation improves tissue perfusions and decreases blood viscosity; this gives a new imminence for pathophysiology of blood viscosity disorders [44, 45].

Pyritinol like ascorbic acid is potent antioxidant and removes free radicals mainly hydroxyls radical which are generated during hydrogen peroxide and superoxide interactions; this hydroxyl radical damages erythrocyte membrane protein and cholesterol in addition to nucleic acid, so pyritinol protects erythrocyte membrane from oxidation, thus improving deformability and ameliorating RBC rigidity [46].

Moreover, pyritinol accelerates white blood cells and inflammatory cell migration into inflamed site without induction of inflammatory mediators releasing during acute and chronic inflammatory disorders associated with hyperviscosity like rheumatoid arthritis [47]. Also, triggered leucocytes increased blood viscosity via reduction in erythrocyte deformability and membrane lipid peroxidation; all these resulted from oxygen free radical, and because pyritinol is a potent scavenger it eliminates the effect of activated white blood cells on erythrocytes and thus on blood viscosity [48].

Erythrocytes are more vulnerable toward oxidative damage via free radicals due to higher hemoglobin and oxygen inside them and high lipid concentration in their membranes, so exposure to oxidative stress leads to erythrocyte rigidity, aggregation, and inhibition of deformability; therefore, oxidative stress is regarded as an important factor for elevation of blood viscosity [49], so the anti-inflammatory effects of pyritinol decrease the inflammatory proteins; therefore, it decreases plasma viscosity and improves the erythrocyte deformability; unfortunately, oxidative markers are not measured in this study.

Combined or joint effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol showed higher improvement in the blood viscosity because both agents are antioxidant like other potent antioxidants such as vitamin E, vitamin C, and other herbal extracts [50].

Plasma viscosity was regarded as marker of acute disease due to elevation of plasma protein; mainly fibrinogen also reflects the erythrocyte rigidity indirectly because erythrocyte rigidity index depends on plasma viscosity; only vinpocetine decreases fibrinogen level significantly, while pyritinol decreases plasma viscosity without affecting fibrinogen level; thrombocyte and leucocytes are not regarded as important factors for blood viscosity; moreover, blood viscosity is correlated with the shear stress, so higher shear stress prevents erythrocyte aggregations, but low shear stress increases their aggregations [51–53].

Additionally, in erythrocyte deformability the structural alterations were high and rapid at high shear blood viscosity compared to low shear due to erythrocyte viscoelasticity; therefore, vinpocetine and pyritinol enhance viscoelasticity through amelioration of low shear whole blood viscosity [54, 55].

The physiological response of increase 10% in hematocrit is elevation in blood viscosity by 20% resulting in reduction in blood flow and elevation of peripheral resistance leading to hypertension complications; the endothelia of atherosclerotic vessels lose their abilities for synthesis and releasing vasodilator nitric oxide, so the vasodilating effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol were capable of inducing vasodilation in elderly or long-term hypertension independent of nitric oxide, but they were capable of reducing blood pressure via reduction of whole blood viscosity, but the vasodilator leads to hypotension and collateral ischemia due to stasis of erythrocyte because of the capillary becoming much narrower for passage of erythrocytes. Therefore, reduction in blood viscosity is an optional way for reduction of blood pressure in complicated cerebrovascular disorders [56].

Therefore, dual combined or joint effects of pyritinol and vinpocetine produced significant rheological improvement via modulation of blood viscosity and other related hemorheological parameters.

5. Conclusions

Joint effects of vinpocetine and pyritinol improve blood and plasma viscosity in patients with cerebrovascular disorders and provide a new therapeutic model for prevention and progression of cerebrovascular disorders.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the research committee and Professor Sadiq M. Alhamash, Dean of College of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriya University, Iraq, for his great support and encouraging progress in the march of scientific advancement and scientific reality in the Faculty of Medicine.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Hayder M. Alkuraishy carried out design, analysis of data, interpretation of results, writing of the paper, and final approval. Ali I. Al-Gareeb carried out conception, revising of paper, and statistical analysis. Ali K. Albuhadilly carried out data collection and drafting of paper.

References

  • 1.Salazar Vázquez B. Y., Martini J., Chávez Negrete A., Tsai A. G., Forconi S., Cabrales P., Johnson P. C., Intaglietta M. Cardiovascular benefits in moderate increases of blood and plasma viscosity surpass those associated with lowering viscosity: experimental and clinical evidence. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2010;44(2):75–85. doi: 10.3233/CH-2010-1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Salazar Vázquez B. Y., Salazar Vázquez M. A., Intaglietta M., De Faire U., Fagrell B., Cabrales P. Hematocrit and mean arterial blood pressure in pre- and postmenopause women. Vascular Health and Risk Management. 2009;5:483–488. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s5798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salazar-Vazquez B. Y., Intaglietta M., Rodŕiguez-Moŕan M., Guerrero-Romero F. Blood pressure and hematocrit in diabetes and the role of endothelial responses in the variability of blood viscosity. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(7):1523–1528. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loscalzo J. Oxidative stress in endothelial cell dysfunction and thrombosis. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis. 2002;32(5-6):359–360. doi: 10.1159/000073600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cecchi E., Marcucci R., Poli D., Antonucci E., Abbate R., Gensini G. F., Prisco D., Mannini L. Hyperviscosity as a possible risk factor for cerebral ischemic complications in atrial fibrillation patients. American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;97(12):1745–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Woodward M., Rumley A., Tunstall-Pedoe H., Lowe G. D. O. Does sticky blood predict a sticky end? Associations of blood viscosity, haematocrit and fibrinogen with mortality in the West of Scotland. British Journal of Haematology. 2003;122(4):645–650. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Skretteberg P. T., Bodegård J., Kjeldsen S. E., et al. Interaction between inflammation and blood viscosity predicts cardiovascular mortality. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2010;44(2):107–112. doi: 10.3109/14017430903171248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cecchi E., Liotta A. A., Gori A. M., Valente S., Giglioli C., Lazzeri C., Sofi F., Gensini G. F., Abbate R., Mannini L. Relationship between blood viscosity and infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. International Journal of Cardiology. 2009;134(2):189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malinova I., Dovgalevsky Y. Hemorheological system in coronary heart disease patients: prognostic value. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2007;6:19–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ciuffetti G., Schillaci G., Lombardini R., Pirro M., Vaudo G., Mannarino E. Prognostic impact of low-shear whole blood viscosity in hypertensive men. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;35(2):93–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2005.01437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ercan M., Konukoglu D. Role of plasma viscosity and plasma homocysteine level on hyperinsulinemic obese female subjects. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2008;38(4):227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Richards R. S., Nwose E. U. Blood viscosity at different stages of diabetes pathogenesis. British Journal of Biomedical Science. 2010;67(2):67–70. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2010.11730293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Truss M. C., Ückert S., Stief C. G., Forssmann W. G., Jonas U. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoenzymes in the human detrusor smooth muscle. II. Effect of various PDE inhibitors on smooth muscle tone and cyclic nucleotide levels in vitro. Urological Research. 1996;24(3):129–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00304075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Psikhiatr M., Korsakova S. The use of encephabol in neurological practice. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii Imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2002;102(6):53–60. (Rus). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toledano A., Bentura M. L. Pyritinol facilitates the recovery of cortical cholinergic deficits caused by nucleus basalis lesions. Journal of Neural Transmission: Parkinson's Disease and Dementia Section. 1994;7(3):195–209. doi: 10.1007/BF02253438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elferink J. G. R., de Koster B. M. Differential stimulation of neutrophil functions by pyrithioxine. International Journal of Immunopharmacology. 1993;15(5):641–646. doi: 10.1016/0192-0561(93)90082-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kidwell C. S., Warach S. Acute ischemic cerebrovascular syndrome: diagnostic criteria. Stroke. 2003;34(12):2995–2998. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000098902.69855.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Purves W. K., Sadava D., Orians G. H., Heller H. C. The Science of Biology. 7th. Sunderland, Mass, USA: Sinauer Associates; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zegers I., Schreiber W., Linstead S., Lammers M., McCusker M., Muñoz A., Itoh Y., Merlini G., Trapmann S., Emons H., Sheldon J., Schimmel H. Development and preparation of a new serum protein reference material: feasibility studies and processing. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2010;48(6):805–813. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lowe G. D. O. Fibrinogen assays for cardiovascular risk assessment. Clinical Chemistry. 2010;56(5):693–695. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.145342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nwose E. Whole blood viscosity assessment issues. Extrapolation chart and reference values. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2010;2:165–169. doi: 10.4297/najms.2010.2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tamariz L. J., Young J. H., Pankow J. S., et al. Blood viscosity and hematocrit as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008;168(10):1153–1160. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Beals M., Gross L., Harreil S. Hemoglobin evolution. http://www.tiem.utk.edu/~gross/bioed/webmodules/hemoglobin.htm.
  • 24.Vaisman S., Kensey K., Cho Y. I. Effect of hemodialysis on whole blood viscosity. International Journal of Artificial Organs. 2009;32(6):329–335. doi: 10.1177/039139880903200603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Probstein F. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics: An Introduction. Boston, Mass, USA: Buttersworth; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Des Guetz G., Uzzan B., Nicolas P., Cucherat M., Morere J.-F., Benamouzig R., Breau J.-L., Perret G.-Y. Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature. British Journal of Cancer. 2006;94(12):1823–1832. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Athanassiou G. A., Moutzouri A. G., Gogos C. A., Skoutelis A. T. Red blood cell deformability in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2010;29(7):845–849. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0936-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Warlow P., Dennis S., Van J. Stroke: A Practical Guide to Management. 2nd. Edinburg, Tex, USA: Blackwell Science; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Coppola L., Caserta F., de Lucia D., Guastafierro S., Grassia A., Coppola A., Marfella R., Varricchio M. Blood viscosity and aging. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2000;31(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4943(00)00063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Toth K., Wenby R. B., Meiselman H. J. Inhibition of polymer-induced red blood cell aggregation by poloxamer 188. Biorheology. 2000;37(4):301–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jung J. M., Lee D. H., Cho Y. I. Non-Newtonian standard viscosity fluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2013;49:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Muravyov A., Tikhomirova I. Calcium Signaling. Vol. 740. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer; 2012. Role Ca2+ in mechanisms of the red blood cells microrheological changes; pp. 1017–1038. (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Muravyov A. V., Tikhomirova I. A., Maimistova A. A., Bulaeva S. V. Extra- and intracellular signaling pathways under red blood cell aggregation and deformability changes. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2009;43(3):223–232. doi: 10.3233/CH-2009-1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Muravyov A. V., Bulaeva S. V., Tikhomirova I. A., Zamishlayev A. V., Uzikova E. V., Miloradov M. J. Macro- and microrheological parameters of blood in patients with cerebral and peripheral atherosclerosis: the molecular change mechanisms after pentoxifylline treatment. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2011;49(1–4):431–439. doi: 10.3233/CH-2011-1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bönöczk P., Gulyás B., Adam-Vizi V., Nemes A., Kárpáti E., Kiss B., Kapás M., Szántay C., Koncz I., Zelles T., Vas A. Role of sodium channel inhibition in neuroprotection: effect of vinpocetine. Brain Research Bulletin. 2000;53(3):245–254. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00354-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Forsyth A. M., Braunmüller S., Wan J., Franke T., Stone H. A. The effects of membrane cholesterol and simvastatin on red blood cell deformability and ATP release. Microvascular Research. 2012;83(3):347–351. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2012.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lovely R. S., Kazmierczak S. C., Massaro J. M., D'Agostino R. B., Sr., O'Donnell C. J., Farrell D. H. γ′ fibrinogen: evaluation of a new assay for study of associations with cardiovascular disease. Clinical Chemistry. 2010;56(5):781–788. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.138347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zh N., Psikhiatr S., Korsakova S. The circadian changes of plasma and blood viscosity and hematocrit in patients with ischemic stroke. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;(supplement 22):22–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fedosov D. A., Noguchi H., Gompper G. Multiscale modeling of blood flow: from single cells to blood rheology. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2014;13(2):239–258. doi: 10.1007/s10237-013-0497-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Franco R. S. Measurement of red cell lifespan and aging. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. 2012;39(5):302–307. doi: 10.1159/000342232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Simmonds M. J., Meiselman H. J., Baskurt O. K. Blood rheology and aging. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology. 2013;10(3):291–301. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greiner H. E., Haase A. F., Seyfried C. A. Neurochemical studies on the mechanism of action of pyritinol. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1988;21(1):26–32. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1017061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ernst E., Szirmai I., Bogar L. Hemorheological effects of pyritinol in patients after ischemic stroke—a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Perfusion. 1992;5(6):184–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jiménez-Andrade G. Y., Reyes-García G., Sereno G., Ceballos-Reyes G., Vidal-Cantú G. C., Granados-Soto V. Pyritinol reduces nociception and oxidative stress in diabetic rats. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2008;590(1–3):170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Deepalakshmi K., Mirunalini S., Krishnaveni M., Arulmozhi V. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant potentials of an ethanolic extract of Ganoderma lucidum in rat mammary carcinogenesis. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines. 2013;11(6):621–627. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(13)60072-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Salim T., Sand-Dejmek J., Sjölander A. The inflammatory mediator leukotriene D4 induces subcellular β-catenin translocation and migration of colon cancer cells. Experimental Cell Research. 2014;321(2):255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Beyrau M., Bodkin J. V., Nourshargh S. Neutrophil heterogeneity in health and disease: a revitalized avenue in inflammation and immunity. Open Biology. 2012;2 doi: 10.1098/rsob.120134.120134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chakraborty S. P., Gautam N., Kundu P. K., Roy S. Age associated oxidative damage in RBC and serum of humans. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2012;2(supplement 1):S268–S274. doi: 10.1016/S2222-1808(12)60164-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jung J. M., Lee D. H., Kim K. T., Choi M. S., Cho Y. G., Lee H. S., Choi S. I., Lee S. R., Kim D. S. Reference intervals for whole blood viscosity using the analytical performance-evaluated scanning capillary tube viscometer. Clinical Biochemistry. 2014;47(6):489–493. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Welsh P., Woodward M., Rumley A., Lowe G. Associations of plasma pro-inflammatory cytokines, fibrinogen, viscosity and C-reactive protein with cardiovascular risk factors and social deprivation: the fourth Glasgow MONICA study. British Journal of Haematology. 2008;141(6):852–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yarnell J. W. G., Patterson C. C., Sweetnam P. M., Lowe G. D. O. Haemostatic/inflammatory markers predict 10-year risk of IHD at least as well as lipids: the Caerphilly collaborative studies. European Heart Journal. 2004;25(12):1049–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yu S., Lowe G. D. O., Yarnell J. W. G., Sweetnam P. M. Resonance-thrombography indices of the haemostatic process in relation to risk of incident coronary heart disease: 9 Years follow-up in the Caerphilly Propective Heart Disease Study. British Journal of Haematology. 2004;126(3):385–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Evju Ø., Valen-Sendstad K., Mardal K.-A. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions. Journal of Biomechanics. 2013;46(16):2802–2808. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Torcello-Gómez A., Wulff-Pérez M., Gálvez-Ruiz M. J., Martín-Rodríguez A., Cabrerizo-Vílchez M., Maldonado-Valderrama J. Block copolymers at interfaces: interactions with physiological media. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2014;206:414–427. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kanaris A. G., Anastasiou A. D., Paras S. V. Modeling the effect of blood viscosity on hemodynamic factors in a small bifurcated artery. Chemical Engineering Science. 2012;71:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Khalid M., Jose D., Santhosh R., Muhammad O., Ronald Z. The effect of vasodilators on mortality of patients with severe mitral regurgitation with normal left ventricular function. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;63(12):1994–1999. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES