Skip to main content
International Journal of Oncology logoLink to International Journal of Oncology
. 2014 Nov 27;46(2):513–520. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2782

Imaging of CAIX-expressing xenografts in vivo using 99mTc-HEHEHE-ZCAIX:1 Affibody molecule

HADIS HONARVAR 1, JAVAD GAROUSI 1, ELIN GUNNERIUSSON 2, INGMARIE HÖIDÉN-GUTHENBERG 2, MOHAMED ALTAI 1, CHARLES WIDSTRÖM 3, VLADIMIR TOLMACHEV 1,, FREDRIK Y FREJD 1,2
PMCID: PMC4277246  PMID: 25434612

Abstract

Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a transmembrane enzyme involved in regulation of tissue pH balance. In cancer, CAIX expression is associated with tumor hypoxia. CAIX is also overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma and is a molecular target for the therapeutic antibody cG250 (girentuximab). Radionuclide imaging of CAIX expression might be used for identification of patients who may benefit from cG250 therapy and from treatment strategies for hypoxic tumors. Affibody molecules are small (7 kDa) scaffold proteins having a high potential as probes for radionuclide molecular imaging. The aim of the present study was to evaluate feasibility of in vivo imaging of CAIX-expression using radiolabeled Affibody molecules. A histidine-glutamate-histidine-glutamate-histidine-glutamate (HE)3-tag-containing CAIX-binding Affibody molecule (HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was labeled with [99mTc(CO)3]+. Its binding properties were evaluated in vitro using CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 renal carcinoma cells. 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was evaluated in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts. The in vivo specificity test confirmed CAIX-mediated tumor targeting. 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 cleared rapidly from blood and normal tissues except for kidneys. At optimal time-point (4 h p.i.), the tumor uptake was 9.7±0.7% ID/g, and tumor-to-blood ratio was 53±10. Experimental imaging of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 xenografts at 4 h p.i. provided high contrast images. The use of radioiodine label for ZCAIX:1 enabled the reduction of renal uptake, but resulted in significantly lower tumor uptake and tumor-to-blood ratio. Results of the present study suggest that radiolabeled Affibody molecules are promising probes for imaging of CAIX-expression in vivo.

Keywords: CAIX, affibody molecules, radionuclide imaging, technetium-99m, HEHEHE-tag, hypoxia, xenografts

Introduction

Carbonic anhydrases (CA) are a family of zinc metallo-enzymes that participate in the regulation of pH, CO2 and HCO3 transport as well as the water and electrolyte balance (1). The membrane associated glycoprotein carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX) has the highest catalytic activity among the members of the family (2) and catalyzes the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide into carbonic acid. CAIX consists of four domains, the N-terminal proteoglycan domain, the catalytic domain exposed to the extracellular milieu, a transmembrane anchor, and a short cytoplasmic tail (3). Expression of CAIX is elicited under hypoxic conditions by hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1α) (4). Overexpression of CAIX is associated with tumor cell hypoxia in a variety of human tumors (5), including breast (6), bladder (7), head and neck carcinomas (8), esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas (9) and carcinomas of the lung (10).

A number of clinical and preclinical studies (11) have demonstrated a correlation between CAIX expression in tumors and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy as well as increased potential for metastasis and poor cancer prognosis (12,13). Thus, identification of hypoxic regions within the tumors will aid the stratification of patients that may benefit from alternative treatment approaches for hypoxic tumors, such as use of radiosensitizers (14), hyperthermia (15), or hypoxia-selective cytotoxins (16). This identification requires availability of hypoxia detection assays.

Measurement of tumor hypoxia is feasible using both traditional oxygenation measurements that are based on oxygen-sensitive electrodes, and by imaging using positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The in vivo oxygenation measurement methodologies are clinically less attractive due to their invasiveness and accessibility limitations (17). Therefore, development of non-invasive approaches for imaging of regional tumor tissue hypoxia remains to be of interest. The limited normal tissue expression of CAIX (epithelia of the stomach, small intestine and gall bladder) (5) makes it an attractive target for molecular imaging, which would allow both identification of hypoxic tumors and predicting treatment outcome.

Currently, radiolabeled nitro-imidazole compounds have found a clinical application for imaging of hypoxia (18). In hypoxic cells, nitro-imidazole compounds are reduced by intracellular reductases into highly reactive intermediates, which subsequently bind to thiol groups of intracellular proteins, resulting in accumulation inside hypoxic cells (19). Multiple studies have been performed to improve in vivo stability of substrates with nitro-groups against enzymatic cleavage for visualization of tumor hypoxia using both SPECT (20) and PET (21). Among these hypoxia imaging agents are the fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) (22) and the recently designed 18FHX4 with improved pharmacokinetic and clearance properties (23). A major challenge in development of nitro-imidazole-based imaging agents for hypoxia is the need to penetrate inside malignant cells, which requires sufficiently high lipophilicity of a tracer. A high lipophilicity slows down elimination of an unbound tracer from normal tissues, which reduces tumor to normal tissue ratio of radioactivity concentration (18). Therefore, the use of an extracellular hypoxia-associated molecular abnormality would be desirable.

Presence of the extracellular domain of CAIX makes it a potential target for specific molecular detection approaches using targeting proteins. Currently, CAIX is used clinically as a diagnostic target for antibodies with implications for both therapy and patient outcome (24). Monoclonal antibodies with high affinity, such as chimeric G250 and M75 have already been generated and tested for this purpose. Among these, M75 is useful for western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry (25) whereas the anti-CAIX antibody cG250 was mostly studied for imaging of renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC) (26). It has demonstrated also an obvious potential for in vivo imaging of hypoxia with high tumor specificity. A considerable effort has been made to explore its potential for immunotherapy as well (27).

Hypoxic regions are, however, distant from blood vessels (28), and an efficient targeting agent must therefore have excellent tissue penetration properties. Like any other monoclonal antibody, the cG250 has some limitations due to its large size. In addition to the relatively poor extravasation and tissue penetration, the long blood circulation of cG250 necessitates several (47) days interval between injection and imaging for obtaining optimal tumor uptake and high contrast images (29). Recently, a number of studies for development of targeting agents with smaller molecular weights, e.g. engineered or enzymatically produced antibody fragments (3032) and peptides (33), have been performed to address this problem. However, there is still room for improvement.

A new class of engineered small scaffold proteins, Affibody molecules, may be an alternative tracer with favorable properties for radionuclide molecular imaging (34). Affibody molecules are composed of a 3-helix cysteine-free bundle consisting of 58 amino acids (35). Randomization of 13 amino acids in helices one and two displaces the native binding specificity and creates a large library from which high affinity binders to different proteinaceous targets are selected (35). Further affinity maturation permits development of binders with picomolar affinity to different cancer-associated molecular targets (36). The small size (7 kDa) of Affibody molecules facilitates high rates of extravasation and tissue penetration, and rapid blood clearance of unbound tracers, which provides high contrast images a few hours after injection (37). Clinical data have demonstrated high potential of Affibody molecules in molecular imaging (38,39).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate feasibility of CAIX imaging in vivo using radiolabeled Affibody molecules.

Materials and methods

General

Buffers, including 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.5, and 0.07 M sodium borate, pH 9.3, were prepared using common methods from chemicals supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). High-quality Milli-Q© water (resistance higher than 18 MΩ/cm) was used for preparing solutions. IsoLink kits were kindly provided by Covidien (Mansfield, MA, USA). 99mTc was obtained as pertechnetate from an Ultra-TechneKow generator (Covidien) by elution with sterile 0.9% NaCl. 125I-sodium iodide was purchased from Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA). Chloramine-T and sodium metabisulfite were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). NAP-5 size exclusion columns were purchased from GE Healthcare (Uppsala, Sweden). Cells used during in vitro experiments were detached using trypsin-EDTA solution (0.25% trypsin, 0.02% EDTA in buffer; Biochrom AG Biotechnologie, Berlin, Germany). For in vivo experiments, Ketalar (50 mg/ml; Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA), Rompun (20 mg/ml; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and heparin (5,000 IE/ml; Leo Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark) were used.

Radioactivity was measured using an automated gamma-counter with a ~7.6-cm (3-in) NaI(Tl) detector (1480 Wizard; Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland). The yield and purity of radiolabeled Affibody molecules was determined by radio-instant thin layer chromatography (radio-ITLC) 150–771 Dark Green, (Tec-Control Chromatography strips from Biodex Medical Systems, Inc., Shirley, NY, USA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), 200 V constant using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen AB, Lidingö, Sweden) in MES buffer (Invitrogen AB) was used for cross-validation of stability results. The distribution of radioactivity along the thin layer chromatography strips and SDS-PAGE gels was measured on a Cyclone™ Storage Phosphor system and analyzed using OptiQuant™ image analysis software (Perkin-Elmer).

Data on cellular processing and biodistribution were assessed by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test using the GraphPad Prism (version 6.00 for Windows; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) in order to determine any significant differences (P<0.05).

Details on selection of CAIX-targeting Affibody molecule ZCAIX:1 will be reported elsewhere. A histidine-glutamate-histidine-glutamate-histidine-glutamate (HE)3-tag (40) was introduced at N terminus of ZCAIX:1 for site-specific labelling with 99mTc.

Labeling and stability test of Affibody molecules with [99mTc (CO)3]+ and 125I

Radiolabelling of (HE)3-ZCAIX:1 with [99mTc(CO)3]+ was performed as described earlier (40). Briefly, 400–500 μl (~3GBq) of 99mTcO4-containing generator eluate was added to a lyophilized IsoLink kit. The mixture was incubated at 100°C for 30 min. Thereafter, 40 μl of mixture was transferred to a vial containing 100 μg of Affibody molecule in 40 μl of PBS, followed by incubation at 50°C. After incubation for 60 and 120 min, 1 μl samples were taken for analysis of the radiochemical labeling yields using radio-ITLC. When the ITLC strips were eluted with PBS, pertechnetate, as well as carbonyl and histidine complexes of 99mTc, migrated with the eluent front (Rf=1.0), while Affibody molecules did not move under these conditions (Rf=0.0).

The radio-labeled Affibody molecules were purified using NAP-5 columns pre-equilibrated and eluted with PBS. The purity of each preparation was evaluated using radio-ITLC. Stability of the 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was tested using histidine challenge method in which paired samples of the radio-labeled conjugate were incubated at 37°C with 500-fold and 5,000-fold excess of histidine for 4 h. Control samples were treated in the same way but incubated in PBS. Thereafter, the samples were analyzed using ITLC as described above.

Indirect radio-iodination of (HE)3-ZCAIX:1 using N-succinimidyl-para-(trimethylstannyl)-benzoate was performed as previously described (41). Stability of the 125I-iodinated Affibody molecule was tested using three different challenge methods: incubation in presence of 2 M non-radioactive NaI to disrupt non-covalent adhesion of radio-iodide with the protein, in presence of 30% ethanol to disrupt hydrophobic interaction of iodobenzoic acid with the protein, and in presence of a mixture of 2 M cold NaI and 30% ethanol. Paired samples of radiolabeled conjugate were incubated at room temperature with the test solution for 4 h.

Affinity determination using LigandTracer

The kinetics of binding of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 to living CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 renal carcinoma cells was measured at 4°C using LigandTracer Yellow (Ridgeview Instruments, Vänge, Sweden) according to the established method (42). The LigandTracer device records in real-time kinetics of binding to and dissociation of radiolabeled tracers from living cells. TraceDrawer software (Ridgeview Instruments) permits to calculate both the association and dissociation rates and, based on that, the affinity of radiolabeled conjugates is determined. In order to cover the concentration span needed for proper affinity estimation, three increasing concentrations of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (30, 90 and 150 nM) were used in each affinity assay.

In vitro binding specificity and cellular processing assays

Binding specificity and cellular processing studies were performed using the renal clear cell carcinoma SK-RC-52 cell line by methodology validated earlier for anti-HER2 Affibody molecules (43).

To evaluate specificity, 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (13 nM) was added to two sets of Petri dishes containing a monolayer cell (~1×106 cells/dish). To one set of the Petri dishes, a 100-fold molar excess of the unlabeled (HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was added ~15 min before addition of the radiolabeled conjugate to saturate binding sites. The cells were incubated in a humidified incubator (5% CO2, 37°C) for 1 h. Thereafter, the medium was collected, the cells were washed with cold serum-free medium and then trypsin-EDTA solution was added and incubated for 10 min. Detached cells were collected. The radioactivity of cells and media was measured and the percent of cell-bound radioactivity was calculated.

To evaluate cellular processing, SK-RC-52 cells were incubated with 13 nM 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 37°C and 5% CO2. At designated time-points (1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h), a group of three dishes was removed from the incubator, the media was collected and cells were washed with ice cold serum-free medium. Thereafter, cells were treated with 0.5 ml 0.2 M glycine buffer, pH 2.0, containing 4 M urea, for 5 min on ice. The acidic solution was collected and cells were additionally washed with 0.5 ml of glycine buffer. The acidic fractions were pooled. The cells were then incubated with 0.5 ml of 1 M NaOH at 37°C for at least 20 min. The cell debris was collected and the dishes were additionally washed with 0.5 ml of NaOH solution. The alkaline fractions were pooled. The radioactivity in the acidic solution was considered as membrane bound, and in the alkaline fractions as internalized.

In vivo evaluation of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 and 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1

Animal experiments have been performed according to national legislation on laboratory animal protection and were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research of the Uppsala University (Permit Number: 48/11). Euthanasia was performed under Rompun/Ketalar anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Biodistribution studies were performed in female NMRI nu/nu mice. Two weeks before the study, 10×106 SK-RC-52 cells were implanted in right hind leg of NMRI nu/nu mice. Average tumor weight was 0.30±0.14 g at the time of the experiment, and the average animal weight was 17.1±1.3 g. For biodistribution study of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1, mice were randomized into groups of four. In order to determine the optimal injected protein dose, 3 groups of animals were injected intravenously (tail vein) with three different doses: 0.3 μg (80 kBq), 1 μg (80 kBq), and 5 μg (110 kBq) of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 in 100 μl PBS and sacrificed at 4 h p.i. To check the specificity of the xenograft targeting of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1, a group of four mice was subcutaneously pre-injected with 500 μg non-labeled (His)6-ZCAIX:1 Affibody molecule 40 min before injection of 1 μg (80 kBq) of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 and the mice were sacrificed at 4 h after injection of radioactive tracer. Two additional groups of mice were injected with 1 μg (110 kBq) to measure biodistribution of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 1 and 8 h p.i.

To study biodistribution of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1, 6 mice were randomized into two groups of 3. Animals were injected intravenously with 1 μg (27 kBq) 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 per animal in 100 μl PBS. The biodistribution was measured at 6 and 8 h after injection.

Mice were sacrificed at predetermined time-points by an intra-peritoneal injection of anesthesia (20 μl/g body weight; Ketalar, 10 mg/ml; Rompun, 1 mg/ml). Organs and tissue samples were excised and weighed, and their radioactivity was measured. The tissue uptake values were calculated as percent of injected dose per gram tissue (% ID/g).

In vivo imaging was performed to obtain a visual confirmation of the biodistribution data. Two SK-RC-52 xenograft bearing mice were injected with 11 MBq (3 μg) of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation at 4 h after injection. The imaging experiment was performed using an Infinia γ-camera (GE Healthcare) equipped with a low energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimator. Static images (30 min) were obtained with a zoom factor of 2 in a 256×256 matrix.

Results

Labeling of Affibody molecules with [99mTc(CO)3]+ and 125I

99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 Affibody molecules were efficiently labeled with 99mTc. The yield was 75±4%. After purification with disposable NAP-5 column, the radiochemical purity of the conjugate was 99.6±0.2%. The radioiodination yield was 14±1%, and the purity of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was of 98±1%.

99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was stable under histidine challenge during 4 h, with no measurable release of radionuclide after incubation with both 500 and 5000-fold molar excess amounts of histidine. Similarly, no release of radioactivity from 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was detected after incubation with NaI (2 M), 30% ethanol or a mixture of NaI (2 M) and 30% ethanol. The amount of released 125I was minor and within accuracy of the analytical method.

Affinity determination using LigandTracer

The kinetic measurements of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 binding to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells in vitro using LigandTracer Yellow confirmed that its high affinity to CAIX was preserved after radiolabeling. The best fitting for 99mTc-labeled (HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was obtained using a 1:2 interaction model, which indicated that the binding of this radiolabeled conjugate to living CAIX-expressing cells is mediated by two binding site populations, one with strong and one with weaker interaction. The dissociation constant at equilibrium (KD) for the first interaction was 1.3 nM, and for the second one 130 nM.

In vitro binding specificity and cellular processing

Addition of 100-fold excess of non-labeled Affibody molecules caused a significant (P<0.005) decrease in CAIX-binding of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 to CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells, from 9.6±0.1 to 0.66±0.02% of added radioactivity. This demonstrated saturable binding of radioconjugates, indicating their specific interaction.

Cellular processing of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 by CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells is presented in Fig. 1. The binding pattern of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 showed a rapid increase in total cell-associated radioactivity up to 2 h but decreased considerably at 8 h (59±2% of maximum) and remained steady up to 24 h (55±4% of maximum). To exclude experimental artifacts, this experiment was repeated twice, but demonstrated very concordant results. The internalization of all radio-conjugates was slow and increased slightly throughout the assay. The percentage of internalized radioactivity by SK-RC-52 cells at 24 h after the start of incubation was 16.7±0.1%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cellular processing of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 by CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 cells in vitro. Cell bound activity is normalized to the maximum uptake. Data are presented as mean values for six cell dishes and standard deviations. Error bars might be smaller than the symbols.

In vivo studies of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 and 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1

The data concerning biodistribution of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 female NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts at 4 h after injection of different protein doses are presented in Tables I and II. There was no significant difference in tumor-to-organ ratios, except that tumor-to-spleen ration was significantly lower at the injected protein dose of 0.3 μg than 5 μg. An injected dose of 1 μg was selected for further animal studies.

Table I.

Biodistribution of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 4 h after injection in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts.

Total injected dose (μg)

Organ 0.3 1 5
Blood 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0
Lung 0.4±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.4±0.1
Salivary gland 0.4±0.1 0.4±0.1 0.5±0.1
Liver 1.2±0.4 1.0±0.4 0.1±0.1
Spleen 0.5±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.4±0.0
Stomach 0.4±0.0 0.5±0.1 0.4±0.1
Duodenum 0.4±0.1 0.5±0.2 0.4±0.1
Colon 0.6±0.3 1.2±0.5 0.9±0.4
Kidney 143±17 141±45 154±2
Tumor 11.0±3.0 10.0±1.0 11.0±2.0
Muscle 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.0
Bone 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.0

Data are presented as a mean % ID/g value for 4 animals ± standard deviation. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 uptake after injection of 0.3, 1 or 5 μg.

Table II.

Tumor-to-organ ratios of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 4 h after injection in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts.

Dose (μg)

Organ 0.3 1 5
Blood 62±14 53±10 65±5
Lung 26±6 35±11 24±7
Salivary gland 27±5 25±6 23±2
Liver 9±2 11±4 11±1
Spleen 23±1a 36±14 29±4
Stomach 29±5 20±6 29±4
Duodenum 30±5 22±8 26±1
Colon 19±8 9±3 14±5
Kidney 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0
Muscle 95±15 104±52 102±30
Bone 47±9 80±32 59±23

Data are presented as a mean value for 4 animals ± standard deviation.

a

Significant difference (P<0.05) between tumor-to-organ ratios after injection of 0.3 and 5 μg.

The results of in vivo specificity test are presented in Fig. 2. Pre-saturation of CAIX with non-labeled Affibody molecule caused decrease of uptake from 9.7±0.7 to 0.5±0.1% ID/g (P<5×10−7). The reduction of tumor uptake demonstrated saturability of the 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 tumor accumulation and suggested its specific targeting. There was no significant difference in 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 uptake in any other organ after injection of excess amount of non-labeled Affibody molecules.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In vivo binding specificity of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts at 4 h after injection. Blocked group was subcutaneously preinjected with a large excess amount of unlabeled Affibody. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for 4 animals.

The data concerning biodistribution of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (injected dose of 1 μg) in SK-RC-52 xenograft bearing female NMRI nu/nu mice at 1, 4 and 8 h p.i. are shown in Tables III and IV. 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 showed a rapid blood clearance already at 1 h p.i. The blood-associated radioactivity reduced ~4 times between 1 and 4 h, but did not change at 8 h after injection in comparison with 4 h. A low level of radioactivity (2.8±1.4% ID at 1 h, 4.5±1.2% ID at 4 h and 1.20±0.30% ID at 8 h p.i.) in the gastrointestinal tract (with its content) suggested that hepatobiliary excretion played a minor role in clearance of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1. Most likely, the clearance of the radio-conjugate from body was via glomerular filtration with subsequent re-absorption in kidneys. The tumor uptake of radioactivity was highest at 1 h (22±3% ID/g), which decreased about two times (9.7±0.7% ID/g) at 4 h and remained at the same level at 8 h after injection. There was significant decrease of radioactivity uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 in lung and salivary glands between 1 and 4 h with further decrease between 4 and 8 h after injection. The concentration of radioactivity in all other organs was low at 1 h and decreased significantly by 4 h (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between 4 and 8 h p.i. On the other hand, there was a significant difference between 1 and 8 h p.i. (P<0.05). Overall, tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-organ (except for tumor-to-colon) ratios of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 were the highest at 4 h (P<0.05), and decreased slightly at 8 h after injection (Table IV).

Table III.

Biodistribution of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (injected dose 1 μg) at 1, 4 and 8 h after injection in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts.

99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1

1 h 4 h 8 h
Blood 0.9±0.2a 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0c
Lung 1.4±0.3a 0.3±0.1b 0.6±0.2c
Salivary gland 1.0±0.2a 0.4±0.1b 0.85±0.2
Liver 4.0±0.7a 1±0.4 0.9±0.3c
Spleen 0.7±0.1a 0.3±0.1 0.6±0.2
Stomach 1.4±0.4a 0.5±0.1 0.5±0.3
Duodenum 2.6±0.5a 0.5±0.2 0.5±0.2c
Colon 0.7±0.1 1.2±0.5 0.5±0.1
Kidney 226±20a 141±45 170±52
Tumor 22.3±3.2a 9.7±0.7 7.3±3.0c
Muscle 0.4±0.1a 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.1
Bone 0.5±0.1a 0.1±0.0 0.3±0.2

Data are presented as a mean % ID/g value for 4 animals ± standard deviation. (Data for intestines with content is presented as % ID/sample).

a

Significant difference (P<0.05) between uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 1 and 4 h after injection.

b

Significant difference (P<0.05) between uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 4 and 8 h after injection.

c

Significant difference (P<0.05) between uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 1 and 8 h after injection.

Table IV.

Tumor-to-organ ratios of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (injected dose 1 μg) at 1, 4 and 8 h after injection in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts.

99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1

1 h 4 h 8 h
Blood 26±4a 53±1 42±7c
Lung 15±3a 35±11b 13±1c
Salivary gland 23±6 25±6b 10±5c
Liver 6±1a 11±4 9±0.3c
Spleen 29±1 36±14b 14±4c
Stomach 17±5 20±6 19±10c
Duodenum 9±3a 22±8 15±3c
Colon 32±5a 9±3 14±3c
Kidney 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.0±0.0c
Muscle 61±14 104±52 45±8c
Bone 47±7 80±32b 30±10c

Data are presented as a mean value for 4 animals ± standard deviation.

a

significant difference (p<0.05) between uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 1 and 4 h after injection.

b

significant difference (p<0.05) between uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 4 and 8 h after injection.

c

significant difference (p<0.05) between uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 1 and 48 h after injection.

The data concerning biodistribution study of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 in SK-RC-52 xenograft bearing mice (6 and 8 h p.i.) are presented in Tables V and VI. There was no significant difference between biodistribution and tumor uptake or tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-organ ratio of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 6 and 8 h p.i. The tumor and kidney uptake of this radio-conjugate was equal at both 6 h (2.3±0.5% ID/g and 2.7±1.4% ID/g) and 8 h (1.6±0.3% ID/g and 1.6±0.1% ID/g) after injection.

Table V.

Biodistribution of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (injected dose 1 μg) at 6 and 8 h after injection in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts.

125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1

6 h 8 h
Blood 0.09±0.02 0.07±0.02
Lung 0.09±0.04 0.05±0.01
Salivary gland 0.10±0.04 0.11±0.05
Liver 0.20±0.01 0.18±0.01
Spleen 0.08±0.02 0.08±0.01
Stomach 0.08±0.03 0.08±0.06
Duodenum 0.07±0.01 0.05±0.03
Colon 0.04±0.01 0.03±0.01
Kidney 2.7±1.4 1.6±0.1
Tumor 2.2±0.5 1.6±0.3
Muscle 0.03±0.01 0.022±0.04
Bone 0.04±0.01 0.04±0.03

Data are presented as a mean % ID/g value for 3 animals ± standard deviation.

Table VI.

Tumor-to-organ ratios of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (injected dose 1 μg) at 6 and 8 h after injection in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SK-RC-52 xenografts.

125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1

6 h 8 h
Blood 26±2 24±5
Lung 30±13 31±5
Salivary gland 22±1 18±11
Liver 11±2 9±1
Spleen 31±12 20±6
Stomach 30±11 28±14
Duodenum 33±6 35±16
Kidney 0.9±0.2 1.0±0.1
Muscle 84±18 77±18
Bone 53±11 56±37

Data are presented as a mean % ID/g value for 3 animals ± standard deviation.

The obtained high contrast images of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 confirmed the biodistribution results (Fig. 3). Images obtained at 4 h p.i. showed no visible uptake in any organ except kidneys. Tumors were clearly visualized. The tumor-to-contralateral site ratio was 16.2±0.6.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Imaging of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 xenografts in NMRI nu/nu mice using clinical gamma-camera. Image was acquired at 4 h after injection of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1. Contours were derived from a digital photograph and superimposed over image to facilitate interpretation. Arrows point at tumors (T) and kidneys (K).

Discussion

Imaging contrast is an important factor determining sensitivity and therefore, accuracy of molecular imaging. Data concerning CAIX-targeting antibodies (31) demonstrated that the use of smaller fragments enables better contrast in comparison with intact IgG, and provides shorter time between injection and peak contrast. Affibody molecules are 4-fold smaller than the smallest antibody fragments. An excellent imaging contrast has been demonstrated for a number of molecular targets using Affibody molecules (37). Therefore, we have generated an Affibody molecule with low nanomolar affinity to CAIX. For biodistribution studies, a negatively charged histidine-glutamate-histidine-glutamate-histidine-glutamate [HEHEHE, (HE)3]-tag was engineered at N-terminus of the selected Affibody molecules. Previous studies have demonstrated that (HE)3-tags enables stable site-specific labeling of Affibody molecules with [99mTc(CO)3]+, and provide much lower hepatic accumulation of radioactivity than with hexahistidine tags (40). In addition, the use of (HE)3-tag provides favorable modification of biodistribution profile even if different labels (e.g. 111In or radioidine) are used (41). In the case of anti-CAIX, the use of (HE)3-tag enabled efficient and stable labeling using commercially available labeling IsoLink kit. Binding of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 to CAIX-expressing cells was saturable, which indicates its binding specificity. The binding of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 showed a maximum uptake at 2 h after incubation start. An important feature of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was relatively slow internalization. Only 16.7% of cell-associated radioactivity was internalized at 24 h after incubation start. Interaction of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 with living SK-RC-52 cells showed the presence of two binding sites, one strong (1.3 nM) and another much weaker.

In vivo, 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 showed efficient and specific targeting of CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 xenografts, since the tumor uptake was reduced from 9.7±0.7 to 0.4±0.1% ID/g (P<5×10−7) by pre-saturation of CAIX in vivo (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference in uptake of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 in other organs, suggesting no on-target interaction of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 in vivo. This was also confirmed by absence of significant difference in biodistribution after injection of 0.3, 1 or 5 μg 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (Tables I and II). The pattern of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 (Tables III and IV) biodistribution at different time-points was similar to biodistribution of anti-HER2 99mTc-(HE)3-ZHER2:342 Affibody molecule (41), which also has no or low target expression in normal tissues. In both cases, there was rapid clearance of radioactivity from blood and normal tissues. At the same time, there was high and non-saturable uptake of radioactivity in kidneys, which is typical for Affibody molecules with residualizing labels. The pattern of tumor uptake in vivo resembled binding to the cells in vitro: a high uptake at 1 h after injection (23±3% ID/g) was significantly reduced to 9.7±0.7% ID/g at 4 h after injection, but further reduction of tumor uptake to 7.3±3% ID/g at 8 h after injection was not significant. The highest tumor-to-organ ratios for 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 were obtained at 4 h after injection. Experimental imaging demonstrated that CAIX-expressing SK-RC-52 xenografts could be visualized with high contrast in mice (Fig. 3). In agreement with biodistribution data, the only organ with higher radioactivity accumulation than in tumor was the kidneys.

One possible clinical application of CAIX imaging is discrimination between benign and malignant primary kidney tumors. This requires higher level of radionuclide accumulation in tumors than in kidneys. Apparently, this is not possible when residualizing labels are used. However, the Affibody molecules showed slow internalization by the tumor cells. Therefore, residualizing properties of a label are not absolutely necessary for a good retention of radionuclides in tumors. On the contrary, internalization of Affibody in kidneys is rapid, and the use of non-residualizing radiohalogen labels results in a rapid washout of radioactivity from kidneys (36,44,41). This created a precondition to obtain a higher radioactivity uptake in tumor than in kidney a few hours after injection for high-affinity anti-HER2 ZHER2:342 Affibody molecule or its derivatives (36,44,41). We tested if this is also correct for (HE)3-ZCAIX:1 using non-residualizing 125I-para-iodobenzoate label. To allow for clearance of radionuclide from kidneys, biodistribution of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 was measured at 6 and 8 h after injection (Table V). As expected, renal accumulation of radioactivity was much lower in the case of radioiodine label than in the case of 99mTc (1.6±0.1 vs. 170±52% ID/g at 8 h p.i., respectively). However, there was also an appreciable release of 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 radioactivity from tumors as well. As a result, tumor-to-kidney ratios were 0.90±0.2 at 6 h p.i. and 0.99±0.09 at 8 h p.i., i.e. a positive contrast was not achieved. It has to be noted that anti-HER2 ZHER2:342 Affibody molecule has low picomolar affinity (36). It is likely that further affinity maturation of anti-CAIX Affibody molecules might provide variants enabling higher uptake in tumors than in kidneys. With the existing affinities, imaging of primary renal cell carcinoma using Affibody molecules is not feasible. Besides lower renal uptake, the use of radioiodine label did not provide any advantage over 99mTc. The tumor-to-blood ratio was higher for the 99mTc. At 8 h p.i., 125I-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 provided higher tumor-to-lung and tumor-to-duodenum ratios than 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at the same time-point. However, these values were not higher than values provided by 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 at 4 h after injection.

Earlier, several approaches to develop probes for imaging of CAIX-expression have been evaluated in mice. The use of intact chimeric G250 antibody resulted in a tumor uptake in the range of 20 to 110% ID/g and tumor-to-blood ratio in the range of 4 to 9, depending on xenograft model and labeling chemistry (31,4546). An optimal imaging time was between 2 and 4 days after injection. The use of Fab and (Fab′)2 fragments enabled reduction of imaging time to 24 h p.i., still tumor-to-blood ratio did not exceed 17 (31,32). Attempts to use radiolabeled sulfonamide derivatives did not yet result in development of an imaging agent with tumor uptake of >0.5% ID/g and tumor-to-blood ratios of more than 1 in murine models (47). Current data suggest that the use of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 permits appreciably higher tumor-to-blood ratio than any existing agent for imaging of CAIX in vivo. In addition, the optimal imaging time is only a few hours after injection which would facilitate potential clinical use. It opens also an opportunity to use short-lived labels, such as 68Ga and 18F, for imaging of hypoxia using Affibody molecules in the future.

In conclusion, we show the utility of radiolabeled Affibody molecules as a very promising format for probes for imaging of CAIX-expression in vivo. The use of 99mTc-(HE)3-ZCAIX:1 permits obtaining the highest tumor-to-blood ratio so far reported in the literature. However, further affinity maturation might be required to provide an Affibody-based agent suitable for imaging of primary renal cell carcinoma.

Acknowledgements

The present research was financially supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden) and the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet).

References

  • 1.Parkkila S. An overview of the distribution and function of carbonic anhydrases in mammals. In: Chegwidden WR, Carter N, Edwards Y, editors. The Carbonic Anhydrases: New Horizons. Birkhauser Verlag; Basel: 2000. pp. 76–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wingo T, Tu C, Laipis PJ, Silverman DN. The catalytic properties of human carbonic anhydrase IX. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;288:666–669. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Opavsky R, Pastorekova S, Zelnik V, et al. Human MN/CA9 gene, a novel member of the carbonic anhydrase family: structure and exon to protein domain relationships. Genomics. 1996;33:480–487. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harris AL. Hypoxia - a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:38–47. doi: 10.1038/nrc704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Potter C, Harris AL. Hypoxia inducible carbonic anhydrase IX, marker of tumour hypoxia, survival pathway and therapy target. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:164–167. doi: 10.4161/cc.3.2.618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hussain SA, Ganesan R, Reynolds G, et al. Hypoxia-regulated carbonic anhydrase IX expression is associated with poor survival in patients with invasive breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;96:104–109. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ord JJ, Agrawal S, Thamboo TP, et al. An investigation into the prognostic significance of necrosis and hypoxia in high grade and invasive bladder cancer. J Urology. 2007;178:677–682. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Le QT, Kong C, Lavori PW, et al. Expression and prognostic significance of a panel of tissue hypoxia markers in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Driessen A, Landuyt W, Pastorekova S, et al. Expression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), a hypoxia-related protein, rather than vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a pro-angiogenic factor, correlates with an extremely poor prognosis in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas. Ann Surg. 2006;243:334–340. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201452.09591.f3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swinson DE, Jones JL, Richardson D, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression, a novel surrogate marker of tumor hypoxia, is associated with a poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:473–482. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Robertson N, Potter C, Harris AL. Role of carbonic anhydrase IX in human tumor cell growth, survival, and invasion. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6160–6165. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brizel DM, Dodge RK, Clough RW, Dewhirst MW. Oxygenation of head and neck cancer: changes during radiotherapy and impact on treatment outcome. Radiother Oncol. 1999;53:113–117. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hockel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, et al. Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4509–4515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zeng L, Ou G, Itasaka S, et al. TS-1 enhances the effect of radiotherapy by suppressing radiation-induced hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activation and inducing endothelial cell apoptosis. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2327–2335. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00943.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zaffaroni N, Fiorentini G, De Giorgi U. Hyperthermia and hypoxia: new developments in anticancer chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:340–342. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2000.1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamazaki Y, Kunimoto S, Ikeda D. Rakicidin A: a hypoxia-selective cytotoxin. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30:261–265. doi: 10.1248/bpb.30.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Raleigh JA, Dewhirst MW, Thrall DE. Measuring tumor hypoxia. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1996;6:37–45. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(96)80034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mees G, Dierckx R, Vangestel C, Van de Wiele C. Molecular imaging of hypoxia with radiolabelled agents. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1674–1686. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1195-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Machulla HJ. Imaging of Hypoxia-Tracer Developments. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht: 1999. pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wiebe LI, McEwan AJB. Scintigraphic imaging of focal hypoxic tissue: development and clinical applications of 123I-IAZA. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2002;45:89–102. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132002000500010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wiebe LI. PET radiopharmaceuticals for metabolic imaging in oncology. In: Tamaki Y, Kuge Y, editors. PET and Molecular Imaging: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2003. pp. 53–76. (International Congress Series 1264C). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Graham MM, Peterson LM, Link JM, et al. Fluorine-18-fluoromisonidazole radiation dosimetry in imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1631–1636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Doss M, Zhang JJ, Bélanger MJ, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the hypoxia marker 18F-HX4 in monkeys and humans determined by using whole-body PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:1016–1024. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283407950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brouwers AH, Buijs WC, Mulders PF, et al. Radioimmunotherapy with [131I]cG250 in patients with metastasized renal cell cancer: dosimetric analysis and immunologic response. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7178–7186. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1004-0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, Wang H, Oosterwijk E, et al. Antibody-specific detection of CAIX in breast and prostate cancers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;28:488–492. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.06.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oosterwijk-Wakka JC, Boerman OC, Peter FA, Oosterwijk M, Oosterwijk E. Application of monoclonal antibody G250 recognizing carbonic anhydrase IX in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:11402–11423. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Steffens MG, Boerman OC, Oyen WJG, et al. MN/CA IX/G250 as a potential target for immunotherapy of renal cell carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:741–746. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kerbel R, Folkman J. Clinical translation of angiogenesis inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:727–739. doi: 10.1038/nrc905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Povoski SP, Hall NC, Murrey DA, Jr, et al. Multimodal imaging and detection strategy with 124 I-Labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody cG250 for accurate localization and confirmation of extent of disease during laparoscopic and open surgical resection of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Surg Innov. 2013;20:59–69. doi: 10.1177/1553350612438416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ahlskog JK, Schliemann C, Mårlind J, et al. Human monoclonal antibodies targeting carbonic anhydrase IX for the molecular imaging of hypoxic regions in solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:645–657. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carlin S, Khan N, Ku T, et al. Molecular targeting of carbonic anhydrase IX in mice with hypoxic HT29 colorectal tumor xenografts. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hoeben BA, Kaanders JH, Franssen GM, et al. PET of hypoxia with 89Zr-labeled cG250-F(ab′)2 in head and neck tumors. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1076–1083. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Askoxylakis V, Garcia-Boy R, Rana S, et al. A new peptide ligand for targeting human carbonic anhydrase IX, identified through the phage display technology. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Löfblom J, Feldwisch J, Tolmachev V, et al. Affibody molecules: engineered proteins for therapeutic, diagnostic and biotechnological applications. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:2670–2680. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nygren PÅ. Alternative binding proteins: affibody binding proteins developed from a small three-helix bundle scaffold. FEBS J. 2008;275:2668–2676. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Orlova A, Magnusson M, Eriksson TL, et al. Tumor imaging using a picomolar affinity HER2 binding affibody molecule. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4339–4348. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ahlgren S, Tolmachev V. Radionuclide molecular imaging using Affibody molecules. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010;11:581–589. doi: 10.2174/138920110792246609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baum RP, Prasad V, Muller D, et al. Molecular imaging of HER2-expressing malignant tumors in breast cancer patients using synthetic 111In- or 68Ga-labeled affibody molecules. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:892–897. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sörensen J, Sandberg D, Sandström M, et al. First-in-human molecular imaging of HER2 expression in breast cancer metastases using the 111In-ABY-025 affibody molecule. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:730–735. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.131243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tolmachev V, Hofstrom C, Malmberg J, et al. HEHEHE-tagged affibody molecules may be purified by IMAC, are conveniently labeled with [99mTc(CO)3]+ and show improved biodistribution. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:2013–2022. doi: 10.1021/bc1002357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Orlova A, Wållberg H, Stone-Elander S, Tolmachev V. On the selection of a tracer for PET imaging of HER2-expressing tumors: direct comparison of a 124I-labeled Affibody molecule and trastuzumab in a murine xenograft model. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:417–425. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Björkelund H, Gedda L, Barta P, Malmqvist M, Andersson K. Gefitinib induces epidermal growth factor receptor dimers which alters the interaction characteristics with 125I-EGF. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wållberg H, Orlova A. Slow internalization of anti-HER2 synthetic affibody monomer 111In-DOTA-ZHER2:342-pep2: implications for development of labeled tracers. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2008;23:435–442. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2008.0464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kramer-Marek G, Kiesewetter DO, Martiniova L, Jagoda E, Lee SB, Capala J. [18F]FBEM-ZHER2:342-Affibody molecule-a new molecular tracer for in vivo monitoring of HER2 expression by positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1008–1018. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0658-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brouwers AH, van Eerd JE, Frielink C, Oosterwijk E, Oyen WJ, Corstens FH, Boerman OC. Optimization of radioimmunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma: labeling of monoclonal antibody cG250 with 131I, 90Y, 177Lu, or 186Re. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:327–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lawrentschuk N, Lee FT, Jones G, Rigopoulos A, Mountain A, et al. Investigation of hypoxia and carbonic anhydrase IX expression in a renal cell carcinoma xenograft model with oxygen tension measurements and 124I-cG250 PET/CT. Urol Oncol. 2011;29:411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Akurathi V, Dubois L, Celen S, et al. Development and biological evaluation of 99mTc-sulfonamide derivatives for in vivo visualization of CA IX as surrogate tumor hypoxia markers. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;71:374–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Oncology are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES