Table 5.
μ (/bp* | Genome | Proteome size1 | Coding | Cell div. | Mut./div.* | Mut./div.* | ΔM/genome* | ΔM/proteome* | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organism | gen.) | size (bp) | (codons) | positions2 | Ploidy | /gen.3 | genome | proteome | CVm4 | ΔM4 | ΔM/div. | mut. | mut. | U | E(a) |
A. thaliana | 6.50×10−9 | 1.57×108 | 1.34×107 | 2.01×107 | 2 | 35 | 0.0292 | 0.0037 | 4.15 | −5.45×10−3 | −1.56×10−4 | −5.34×10−3 | −4.17×10−2 | 0.027 | −0.39 |
C. elegans | 5.75×10−9 | 9.70×107 | 1.00×107 | 1.51×107 | 2 | 9 | 0.062 | 0.0096 | 1.49 | −1.07×10−3 | −1.18×10−4 | −1.91×10−3 | −1.23×10−2 | 0.007 | −0.25 |
D. melanogaster5 | 4.65×10−9 | 1.40×108 | 7.10×106 | 1.06×107 | 2 | 36 | 0.018 | 0.0014 | 1.54 | −4.87×10−3 | −1.35×10−4 | −7.15×10−3 | −9.84×10−2 | 0.1 | −0.14 |
C. reinhardtii | 2.08×10−10 | 1.12×108 | 1.31×107 | 1.96×107 | 1 | 1 | 0.0233 | 0.0041 | 0.54 | −2.44×10−5 | −2.44×10−5 | −1.05×10−3 | −5.97×10−3 | 0.002 | −0.04 |
S. cerevisiae | 3.30×10−10 | 1.25×107 | 2.91×106 | 4.36×106 | 1 | 1 | 0.0041 | 0.0014 | 0.09 | −5.45×10−6 | −5.45×10−6 | −1.32×10−3 | −3.79×10−3 | 2.4×10−5 | −0.13 |
E. coli | 2.60×10−10 | 4.64×106 | 1.32×106 | 1.97×108 | 1 | 1 | 0.0012 | 0.0005 | 0.02 | −2.50×10−6 | −2.50×10−6 | −2.07×10−3 | −4.88×10−3 | 1.7×10−4 | −0.01 |
The organisms listed are those for which genomic and phenotypic outcomes of MA are available. The figures reported are the mean value for each species as summarized in Halligan and Keightley (2009 and references therein). Using available estimates of the mutation rate (μ), genome size, and proteome size, we calculate the change in fitness per mutation.
gen. = generations; div. = divisions.
1Proteome sizes were taken from Massey (2008) and references therein.
2The number of coding positions was estimated as two-thirds of CDS to account for synonymous changes.
3Cell divisions per generation were taken from Lynch (2010) and references therein.
4MA results were taken from Table1 of Halligan and Keightley (2009), which tabulated standardized parameter estimates from MA studies.
5Mean values for D. melanogaster exclude the extreme outlier values of Gong et al. (2005) (see Halligan and Keightley 2009 for details).