Abstract
For many years, the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2 was an orphan receptor that was studied in the context of inflammatory and autoimmune disease. However, in 2005, a new cytokine — interleukin-33 (IL-33) — was identified as a functional ligand for ST2. IL-33/ST2 signalling is involved in T-cell mediated immune responses, but more recently, an unanticipated role in cardiovascular disease has been demonstrated. IL-33/ST2 not only represents a promising cardiovascular biomarker but also a novel mechanism of intramyocardial fibroblast–cardiomyocyte communication that may prove to be a therapeutic target for the prevention of heart failure.
The interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor family has several members, including the classical interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) and the interleukin-18 receptor (IL-18R)1. In 1989, one member of the family, ST2, was identified as an orphan receptor2. Investigation into the function of ST2 revealed its participation in inflammatory processes, particularly regarding mast cells, type 2 CD4+ T-helper cells and the production of Th2-associated cytokines3. In fact, ST2 was characterized as a specific cellular marker that differentiated Th2 from Th1 T-cells4. Clinical and experimental observations led to the association of ST2 with disease entities such as asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, collagen vascular diseases and septic shock5–9.
In 2005, the discovery of interleukin-33 (IL-33) as an ST2 ligand provided new insights into ST2 signalling10. IL-33 is clearly a potential mediator of diverse inflammatory diseases11. However, despite its heritage in the investigation of classical inflammatory diseases such as asthma and urticaria, IL-33 has now also been shown to participate in cardiovascular pathophysiology. As will be discussed in this Review, myocardial production of IL-33 can protect cardiac function in response to pressure overload12. Furthermore, the IL-33/ST2 system may play a part in the progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease13.
Beyond its role as a therapeutic target, the soluble form of ST2 has also emerged as a biomarker for disease. For example, serum levels of ST2 are elevated in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma5. Furthermore, in emergency-room patients presenting with shortness of breath, serum levels of ST2 can discriminate between heart failure and non-cardiovascular aetiologies14. Thus, ST2 represents a promising biomarker for cardiac injury.
This Review will discuss the discovery of the IL-33/ST2 system as a mediator of inflammation, but will focus on its emergence as a novel cardioprotective paracrine system and the therapeutic potential of targeting this pathway in the prevention of cardiac fibrosis and heart failure.
Basic biology of ST2
Structure
ST2 (also known as IL1RL1, DER4, T1 and FIT-1) is a member of the Toll-like/IL-1-receptor superfamily. Members of this superfamily are defined by a common intracellular domain, the Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain. This domain of ~160 amino acids is composed of a central five-stranded β-sheet surrounded by five α-helices located on the cytosolic end of the protein15. The Toll-like/IL-1-receptor superfamily can be divided into three subfamilies based on their extracellular domains: the IL-1 receptor-like subfamily, the Toll receptor subfamily and a family comprised of their adaptor proteins. The IL-1 receptor-like subfamily is characterized by three linked immunoglobulin motifs on the extracellular domain of the protein. Members of this family include the type I and II IL-1Rs (IL-1R1 and IL-1R2), the IL-18R, their accessory proteins IL-1RAcP and IL-18RAcP, and ST2, among others. The Toll receptor subfamily is characterized by extracellular leucine-rich repeat motifs and is represented by the Toll-like receptors TLR-1–12 (reviewed in REFS 16,17); these receptors serve as gateways to proinflammatory signalling pathways. A family of five adaptor molecules comprised of myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), MyD88-adaptor-like protein (MAL, also known as TIRAP), TIR-domain-containing adaptor protein inducing IFNβ (TRIF, also known as TICAM1), TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM, also known as TICAM2) and sterile α- and armadillo-motif containing protein (SARM) has also been identified (reviewed in REF. 18) (BOX 1).
Box 1. The Toll-like/IL-1-receptor superfamily.
The Toll-like/Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor superfamily members share a Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) sequence. There might be significant differences between TIR domains of different TIR-containing molecules at both the primary and tertiary structural level, with sequence conservation being roughly between 20–30%. However, the basic common TIR structure is that of a central five-stranded β-sheet surrounded by five α-helices, as elucidated by X-ray crystallography by Xu and colleagues in 2000 (REF. 15). The TIR domain mediates the interaction between members of the superfamily, specifically receptor–receptor, adaptor–adaptor and receptor–adaptor protein dimerization.
The Toll-like/IL-1 receptor superfamily can be further subdivided into the IL-1 receptor-like family, the Toll receptor family and the TIR-containing adaptor protein family (see figure, part a). The IL-1 receptor-like subfamily shares the common feature of linked immunoglobulin motifs within the extracellular domain. Members of this family include the type I and II IL-1 receptor (IL-1R1 and IL-1R2), the IL-18 receptor (IL-18R), their accessory proteins IL-1RAcP and IL-18RAcP, ST2 and others (such as IL-1RRP2 and TIG1RR)157. As their name implies, they serve as transmembrane receptors for various interleukins, modulating leukocyte responses upon cytokine stimulation and activation9. The Toll receptor subfamily members are type-1 transmembrane proteins characterized by extracellular leucine-rich-repeat motifs linked to an intracellular TIR containing domain. This subfamily is represented by the Toll-like receptors (TLRs). The founding member of this family, Toll, was identified in the fruitfly, and noted to be necessary for dorso-ventral polarity during embryonic development. TLRs are conserved across most species and to date, 13 mammalian TLRs have been identified (10 in human, 12 in mice158). They are expressed on various cell types and are modulated in response to extracellular stresses and cytokine-mediated intercellular crosstalk (reviewed in REF. 159). The TIR-containing adaptor subfamily is a family of five molecules and includes myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), MAL (MyD88-adaptor-like, also known as TIRAP), TRIF (TIR-domain containing adaptor protein inducing IFNβ, also known as TICAM1), TRAM (TRIF-related adaptor molecule, also known as TICAM2) and SARM (sterile α- and armadillo-motif containing protein).
The IL-1 cytokine family. IL-1α (IL-1F1), IL-1β (IL-1F2), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra or IL-1F3), IL-18 (IL-1F4), IL-1F5–10 and IL-33 (IL-1 F11) make up the IL-1 family of cytokines. Members of this family display similar genomic intron–exon sequences and protein tertiary structure, specifically twelve interwoven β-sheets in a structure known as the β-trefoil160 (reviewed in REFS 9,161). In humans, most of the members of this family (excluding IL-18) reside on chromosome 2 (2q13–q21), within an ~450 kb gene cluster162–164. In 2005, Schmitz and colleagues used a generic β-trefoil protein sequence derived by superposition of IL-1 and FGF protein structures to uncover a novel member of the IL-1 family which was subsequently named IL-33 (IL-1F11)10. Depicted here (see figure, part b) are the structures of IL-18 (REF. 166), IL-1β160,164,165 and human basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2)167 displaying the β-trefoil fold that is common to members of the IL-1 family and putatively part of the structure of IL-33. IL-33 additionally contains an evolutionarily conserved homeodomain-like helix–turn–helix (HTH) DNA binding domain that is necessary and sufficient for nuclear targeting38.

Isoforms
The gene for ST2 spans ~40 kb on human chromosome 2q12, and is part of the larger human IL-1 gene cluster of ~200 kb (Genbank accession number AC007248). ST2 is conserved across species, with homologues in the genomes of mouse (Mus musculus chromosome 1), rat (Rattus norvegicus chromosome 9) and fruitfly (homologues to the Drosophila melanogaster Toll protein). The initial discovery of ST2 in 1989 by two independent laboratories working with growth-stimulated mouse 3T3 fibroblasts2,19,20 described a 2.7 kb transcript encoding a ~37 kD unglycosylated secreted protein corresponding to a 60–70 kD glycosylated product, which in hindsight represented the soluble form of ST2, sST2 (REFS 21,22). In 1993, a 5 kb transcript was identified with a putative transmembrane motif. The protein product of this transcript proved to be the transmembrane receptor ST2L23. Four isoforms of ST2 exist — sST2, ST2L, ST2V and ST2LV. The soluble (sST2, also known as IL1RL1-a) and the transmembrane (ST2L, also known as IL1RL1-b) forms arise from a dual promoter system to drive differential mRNA expression24–26. sST2 lacks the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains contained within the structure of ST2L and includes a unique nine amino-acid C-terminal sequence27. The overall structure of ST2L is similar to the structure of the type I IL-1 receptors, which are comprised of an extracellular domain of three linked immunoglobulin-like motifs, a transmembrane segment and a TIR cytoplasmic domain. ST2V and ST2LV are two splice variants of ST2. Loss of the third immunoglobulin motif and alternative splicing in the C-terminal portion of ST2, resulting in a unique hydrophobic tail, produces ST2V28, whereas alternative splicing, leading to deletion of the transmembrane domain of ST2L, produces ST2LV29.
Expression and tissue localization
The earliest expression of ST2 in mice is in fetal liver tissue with restricted expression in haematopoietic organs in the adult. More detailed investigation revealed that ST2L is restricted to the surface of Th2 and mast cells, but that it is not expressed by Th1 or other immune cells30–32. ST2L may therefore serve as a marker for effector Th2 cells4.
Whereas ST2L is constitutively expressed primarily in haematopoietic cells, sST2 expression is largely inducible and initially seemed to be restricted to integument (including fibroblasts), retinal, mammary and osteogenic tissue25,33. Mouse dermal tissue can be stimulated to express sST2 after exposure to ultraviolet radiation or the proinflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor (TNF), IL-1α and IL-1β. In contrast to murine tissues, constitutive sST2 expression might be more ubiquitous in humans34.
Experiments with human tissue revealed that the splice variant ST2V is expressed predominantly in gastrointestinal organs including stomach, large and small intestine, and spleen. Its expression is notably absent from liver and cardiac tissues, and confocal microscopy in cells transfected with ST2V suggests restricted localization at the plasma membrane35.
ST2LV was recently discovered in a search for a chick (Gallus gallus) ST2 homologue. This isoform seems to be expressed during the latter half of embryogenesis in cerebral, ocular, cardiac and pulmonary tissue, and its expression declines relative to the robust expression in ocular tissue in the adult29. The cellular localization, as well as the expression and tissue localization, of ST2LV in other species is yet to be explored.
ST2 ligand identification: IL-33
A major roadblock in understanding the function of ST2 was the lack of a functional endogenous ligand. However, in 2005, a β-trefoil fold protein sequence derived by superposition of IL-1 and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) protein structures was used to mine the public genomic database, which lead to the discovery of a novel member of the IL-1 family from a dog cDNA library. The mouse and human sequences of this candidate gene were deduced by expressed sequence tag alignment, which mapped to human chromosome 9p24.1 and mouse chromosome 19qC1. By sequence analysis, the protein was found to contain a pro-domain with a full-length mass calculated at 30 kD. In vitro translation of this protein and treatment with caspase-1 yielded a processed protein of 18 kD that activated the ST2 receptor10. This protein, which was named IL-33 (also known as IL-1F11), has now been classified as a member of the IL-1 interleukin family, whose members are characterized by an array of 12 β-strands (the IL-1/FGF β-trefoil fold) and the absence of a classical secretory N-terminus peptide sequence (BOX 1).
Interestingly, the IL-33 protein had previously been isolated in a search for the ST2 ligand, in which Kumar and colleagues identified two proteins produced by quiescent 3T3 cells that were precipitated by an ST2-Fc fusion protein. These molecules were ~32 kD and 18 kD in mass, which probably represented the uncleaved and mature IL-33 proteins, respectively36. In addition, in 2003, as part of a search for transcripts unique to high endothelial venules, a gene was identified with a sequence that localized to human chromosome 9p24.1. Antibodies raised against this peptide sequence precipitated a 30 kD protein37. The sequence of this protein was later confirmed to be identical to that identified by computational methods in 2005 by Schmitz and colleagues38.
IL-33 contains a putative DNA-binding domain37 and is localized in the nucleus, most notably within heterochromatin subdomains and mitotic chromosomes. The N-terminus of IL-33 contains an evolutionarily conserved homeodomain-like helix–turn–helix (HTH) DNA binding domain, which is necessary and sufficient for nuclear targeting and is involved in the repression of transcription that has been ascribed to IL-33 (REF. 38). Precursor IL-33 may require caspase cleavage to yield a mature protein capable of nuclear targeting39. The existence of a cytokine as an extracellular ligand as well as an intranuclear effector is not unprecedented; a similar function has previously been noted for IL-1α and HMBG1 (REF. 40). Thus, IL-33 might have intracellular functions that are independent of binding to the ST2 receptor.
IL-33/ST2 signalling
The mode by which IL-33 exerts its effect has not been fully established but it probably acts similarly to other members of the IL-1 family, specifically IL-1β and IL-18. It has been proposed that upon synthesis, precursor IL-33 enters specialized secretory lysosomes. Caspase-1-dependent cleavage of pro-IL-33, lysosomal navigation and fusion with the cell plasma membrane may result in the release of IL-33 into the interstitium as an active cytokine10,11. IL-33 could then interact with its receptor on a target cell membrane to affect downstream signalling and/or be transported to the target cell nucleus, where it could act as a DNA binding factor (FIG. 1). However, although in vitro evidence of caspase-1 cleavage has been published10,39, in vivo data has been less convincing38. A caspase-1 cleavage sequence within the primary IL-33 protein structure is not conserved across all species38 and definitive localization of pro-IL-33 within lysosomal structures has not yet been reported. The heterochromatin-binding of IL-33 resembles the biology of IL-1α more closely than other members of the IL-1 family and, as has recently been suggested for pro-IL-1α, it is possible that caspase-1 acts as a secretory targeting factor for pro-IL-33 (REF. 41).
Figure 1. A model for IL-33/ST2 signalling.
The myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-dependent pathway of Toll-like receptor signalling involves Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) dimerization between the receptor and the MyD88-adaptor-like protein (MAL). Recruitment of MyD88 and downstream activation of TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) via Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) proteins results in TRAF6-mediated activation of the inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) kinase (IKK) complex and liberation of NF-κB from the complex. Free NF-κB is then able to bind DNA and act as a gene transcription regulator (reviewed in REF. 158). IL-33 signalling appears to share many of these properties and events downstream of IL-33 stimulation may include phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, p38 MAPK, JNKs as well as activation of NF-κB10. It has been proposed that caspase-1-dependent cleavage of pro-IL-33, subsequent lysosomal navigation and fusion with the cell plasma membrane results in release of IL-33 into the interstitium as an active cytokine10,11. IL-33 binds to its receptor complex composed of ST2L (the transmembrane isoform of ST2) and the IL-1 receptor accessory protein IL-1RAcP44. Subsequent sequestering of the adaptor proteins MyD88 and MAL results in modulation of IRAK mediated TRAF6 activation and subsequent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and IKK/NF-κB activation42,48. The nature of this modulation of NF-κB activity by IL-33 is complex. In unstimulated cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts in vitro, exposure to IL-33 activates NF-κB. However, NF-κB activation via hypertrophic stimuli is attenuated by exposure to IL-33 (REF. 12). Interestingly, although TRAF6 appears to be required for IL-33-mediated NF-κB activation and downstream induction of Th2 cytokines, IL-33-mediated ERK activation might be TRAF6 independent46. Furthermore, IL-33 might activate the transcription factor AP-1 independently of its effects on NF-κB47. Exactly where the pivotal points of IL-33 signal regulation reside along this pathway from IL-33 receptor activation to NF-κB activity modulation is still unclear. Even before IL-33 binds to its receptor, its action could be altered by the decoy receptor soluble ST2 (sST2). sST2 is a variant of the full-length ST2 gene lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains contained within the structure of the transmembrane isoform of the gene27. sST2 in the extracellular environment might bind free IL-33, thereby effectively decreasing the concentration of IL-33 that is available for ST2L binding and reducing the biological effect of IL-33 (REF. 12).
IL-33 might also act in an autocrine fashion as well as a secreted paracrine or endocrine effector, but active secretion of IL-33 from cells has also not yet been documented.
In general, upon activation of a Toll-like receptor/IL-1-receptor superfamily member, the transmembrane receptor’s TIR domain dimerizes with the TIR domain of cytosolic adaptor molecules. The adaptor proteins MyD88 and the associated protein IL-1R-associated kinase (IRAK) activate downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-kinases through TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) signalling, which in turn activates activator protein 1 (AP-1) through c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs). TRAF6 also activates the inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) kinase (IKK) complex, leading to downstream liberation of active NF-κB from the complex (reviewed in REF. 42).
Features of the Toll-like receptor/IL-1-receptor system that are specific to IL-33 signalling have recently been clarified. IL-33 appears to bind a receptor complex composed of ST2L and IL-1RAcP. The affinity of IL-33 for ST2L is enhanced in the presence of IL-1RAcP, and mast cells from IL-1RAcP-deficient mice failed to release IL-6 upon IL-33 exposure43. In agreement with this finding, IL-1RAcP-null mice exposed to IL-33 failed to mount the typical cellular hyperplasia and inflammatory-cell infiltrate that is seen in wild type counterparts44. Additionally, the inability of D6/76 E4 cells to respond to IL-33, can be rescued by IL-1RAcP transfection, which leads to downstream NF-κB activation45.
Events downstream of IL-33 stimulation may include phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, p38 MAPK, JNKs and activation of NF-κB10. Interestingly, although TRAF6 appears to be required for IL-33-mediated NF-κB activation and downstream induction of Th2 cytokines, IL-33-mediated ERK activation might be TRAF6 independent46.
However, the relationship between ST2L and NF-κB activation has been a matter of some debate. In multiple models, activation of ST2L results in AP-1 activation independent of NF-κB47, and activation of NF-κB in HEK293 cells can be inhibited by prior ST2L transfection. Thus, ST2L may exert an anti-NF-κB effect by sequestering MyD88 and MAL48. In basophils, cytokine release upon exposure to IL-33 requires ST2L and MyD88 (REF. 49). IL-33 activates NF-κB but attenuates the activation of NF-κB by angiotensin II or phenylephrine in cardiomyocytes, and to a lesser degree in cardiac fibroblasts12. These data indicate that IL-33 may function as a modulator of NF-κB and canonical Toll-like receptor/IL-1-receptor signalling (FIG. 1).
sST2 as a decoy receptor
Whereas ST2L mediates the effect of IL-33 on Th2-dependent inflammatory processes, sST2 has been implicated in the attenuation of Th2 inflammatory responses. Moreover, a role for sST2 as a decoy receptor, similar to that of IL1-R2 in IL-1 signalling, is emerging.
Administration of an antibody raised against a fusion protein of human Fc and the ST2 extracellular domain, reduced pulmonary eosinophilia in mice exposed to aerosolized ovalbumin compared with controls. Administration of the fusion protein itself produced similar results30. In another set of experiments, exposure of murine splenocytes to sST2 inhibited the production of Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-5, but not the Th1 cytokine, INFγ, when exposed to ovalbumin in vitro. In a gene transfer model, intravenous administration of sST2 cDNA to mice before exposure to aerosolized ovalbumin reduced the concentration of these cytokines, as well as the cell count of eosinophils, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid compared with mice exposed to non-coding DNA or vehicle alone50. These data suggest that the ST2 gene may function not only as a mediator of IL-33 function in its ST2L transmembrane form, but also as an inhibitor of IL-33 and Th2 function, potentially via its soluble sST2 form acting as a decoy receptor (reviewed in REF. 3). To directly investigate this possibility, a murine thymoma cell line was stably transfected to express ST2L. Exposure to sST2 inhibited the binding of IL-33 to ST2L on the cell surface, and pre-treatment with sST2 suppressed the induction of NF-κB normally observed following IL-33 stimulation51.
This inhibitory effect of sST2 on IL-33 signalling through ST2L is also apparent in the cardiovascular system. Administration of recombinant IL-33 to cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes blocked the pro-hypertrophic effects of angiotensin II or phenylephrine. However, administration of sST2 reversed this anti-hypertrophic effect of IL-33 (REF. 12). Furthermore, growth stimulation of cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate resulted in production of total IL-33 and sST2 protein. However, a fall in free IL-33 protein was noted after pre-incubation with sST2-Fc fusion protein12. These data suggest that the soluble form of ST2 may sequester IL-33 and, thereby, modulate IL-33/ST2L signalling. Further study is required to ascertain if these in vitro findings correspond with physiologically meaningful effects of sST2 in vivo.
Role of IL-33/ST2 in disease
Inflammatory conditions
IL-33 was originally described as a modulator of inflammation, tipping the balance towards CD4+ T helper-cell type 2 mediated immune responses. IL-33 may serve as a chemotactic factor for Th2 cells52 and induce the production of the Th2-associated interleukins IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 (REF. 10). Mice lacking the gene for IL-4, the prototypical Th2 cytokine, still express ST2L on the surface of mature Th2 cells53, albeit the ability to mount a Th2-cytokine response to an antigen is reduced compared with wild-type counterparts54. Mice with targeted deletion of ST2 develop normally and exhibit normal Th2-cell maturation, but display altered Th2-mediated responses in an antigen-specific fashion. They are able to mount an IL-4 and IgE response to infection with the helminthic parasite Nippostrongylus brasiliensis that is equivalent to their wild-type counterparts55 but do not form pulmonary granulomas in response to intravenous injection of Schistosoma mansoni eggs56. Taken together, these data suggest that ST2L and IL-4 production could serve as markers for distinct subpopulations of Th2 cells57 or as parallel complimentary systems, each sufficient but not necessary for the initiation of Th2 immune responses to antigen (FIG. 2).
Figure 2. IL-33 in the type 2 immune response.
Upon exposure to antigen and the proper interleukin milieu, CD4+ Th0 cells commit to either the Th1 or the Th2 lineage. As classically described, ‘type 1’ immune responses are typified by proliferation and activation of Th1 cells via exposure to certain interleukins including IL-12 and IL-18. Activated Th1 cells release characteristic cytokines such as IL-2 and interferon γ (INFγ) (among others) in response to pathogens. The ‘type 2’ response is typified by proliferation and activation of Th2 cells and release of their characteristic cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 (among others) in response to extracellular, for example, parasitic, pathogens. How the appropriate immune response is chosen upon a particular threat has been the focus of much research and debate. Cells that first encounter invading pathogens (antigen-presenting cells) present foreign antigens to Th0 cells. Antigen presentation in combination with secretion of specific cytokines promotes the commitment of Th0 cells towards one lineage over another, and the initiation of a counter immune response to the infection (reviewed in REF. 165). In the presence of an antigen, direct stimulation of ST2L or exposure to IL-4 appears to be sufficient for the activation of Th2 cells and the release of Th2-associated cytokines10. Exposure to IL-33 results in chemotaxis of Th2 cells52 and the release of Th2-associated cytokines10. IL-33 can coax the release of Th2-associated cytokines from mast cells63 as well as basophils166. IL-33 might also promote superoxide production and degranulation of eosinophils167. Interestingly, recent evidence hints at a more promiscuous role for IL-33 as it has been found to induce INFγ release from antigen-exposed Th2 cells, natural killer (NK) cells and invariant NK T cells166. To regulate this IL-33 mediated type 2 response, soluble ST2 (sST2) in the extracellular environment might act as a decoy, binding free IL-33 available to ST2L. Recently, it has been shown that a soluble form of the IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAcP) might serve as a co-decoy, enhancing the ability of sST2 to inhibit IL-33 signalling168.
The observation that ST2L is a cell surface marker as well as an effector molecule in the regulation of Th2 cell function is consistent with subsequent studies demonstrating a role for IL-33/ST2 in diseases associated with a Th2 response such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, collagen vascular diseases and pleural malignancy.
Asthma
It has long been held that T-cells have a central role in the pulmonary response to allergen57. Specifically, evidence points to a primary contribution from Th2 cells58. Mice lacking both IL-4 and IL-5 exhibit airway hyper-responsiveness following exposure to aerosolized ovalbumin, implicating an IL-4/IL-5 independent process59. This process may involve the IL-33/ST2 system as most50,55,60,61, though not all55, studies examining ST2 suggest that it is required for antigen-induced airway inflammation.
Specifically, Hoshino and colleagues generated an ST2-null mouse by replacing the first ~1300 base pairs of the ST2 gene on mouse chromosome 1 (corresponding with the first 96 amino acids of the mature protein) with a neomycin resistance gene cassette via homologous recombination55. At 20 weeks of age, the mice appeared healthy and fertile. Both mast cells and splenic CD4+ cells were skewed towards the Th2 lineage by in vitro exposure to IL-4 and anti-INFγ antibody. The resulting Th2-developing cells produced equivalent amounts of IL-4 as cells from their wild-type counterparts. Furthermore, pre-immunized ST2-null and wild-type animals exposed to aerosolized ovalbumin displayed a quantitatively equivalent IgE and eosinophil response. Pulmonary histology from ST2-null mice displayed wide-spread inflammation. By contrast, using similar models of pulmonary inflammation, several studies have suggested a critical role of sST2 in Th2 cell function. Intravenous gene transfer of murine sST2 (REF. 38) or administration of an immunoglobulin against IL-33 (REF. 37) resulted in marked attenuation of airway inflammation in response to aerosolized ovalbumin challenge. The reason for the discrepancies between studies utilizing antibody-based IL-33 inhibition versus genetic deletion of ST2 is unclear. Genetic deletion of ST2 should result in the loss of all ST2 isoforms unlike selective loss of sST2 function with an antibody-based approach. It is possible that genetic deletion of ST2 resulted in compensatory induction of other Th2 activating pathways. Furthermore, the use of an antibody against IL-33 may exert non-specific effects that might not have been initially appreciated. However, the totality of data suggests that the IL-33/ST2 system is involved in Th2-mediated immune responses in the lung.
It seems that IL-33 might also participate in mast-cell activation during the response to allergen. Exposure of human or murine mast cells to IL-33 results in the secretion of various interleukins and chemokines62,63. Exposure of mice to exogenous IL-33 results in airway hyperresponsiveness and airway goblet-cell hyperplasia in a lymphocyte-independent process49. Direct exposure to IL-33 results in epithelial hypertrophy and mucus accumulation in bronchial structures10. In keeping with the proposed decoy function ascribed to sST2, pre-exposure to sST2 results in reduced production of Th2 cytokines in a mouse model of allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation50. As a clinical correlate, serum levels of sST2 are elevated in patients who suffer from an acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma compared with healthy controls5. Additionally, serum sST2 levels are increased in both serum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples from patients with acute eosinophilic pneumonia64.
Fibroproliferative diseases
The IL-33/ST2 system might also participate in the fibrotic response to tissue injury65. ST2 expression gradually increases concurrently with other Th2-associated cytokines in lung tissue as well as in cultured alveolar epithelia after exposure to bleomycin, a pulmonary toxin66. In agreement with this finding, patients with an acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but not those with stable disease, have elevated serum levels of sST2 (REF. 67).
Mice exposed to the hepatotoxin carbon tetrachloride exhibited an accelerated post-injury fibrotic response when treated with an sST2-Fc fusion protein. The Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 and IL-13 were elevated in isolates of the intrahepatic lymphocytes. In this case, the effect seemed to be mediated by the ability of the fusion protein to block TLR-4 mediated signalling68. Involvement of sST2 in TLR-4 signalling had been suggested previously, in the model of LPS-induced sepsis as mentioned below69,70.
The fibrotic response to injury is a feature of most tissues. The involvement of the IL-33/ST2 system in other organs and modes of injury, such as lacerative cutaneous lesions and radiation fibrosis, is yet to be investigated.
Rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune diseases
Rheumatoid arthritis is characterized by Th1-dominant cellular inflammation71,72. Administration of an Fc-sSt2 fusion protein resulted in a reduction in both the severity of collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice and of serum levels of INFγ and TNFα6. How the fusion protein is functioning with respect to IL-33/ST2L in this experiment is unclear; however, Th2 cytokines were not upregulated.
IL-33 might also participate in antigen-induced cutaneous and articular pain processing. Mice administered an intra-articular irritant in the form of bovine serum albumin exhibited dose-dependent hypernociception. This response is IL-33-mediated and inhibited by administration of sST2 (REF. 73). Curiously, in this model of antigen-induced integumental and articular injury, IL33 appears to be a proximal mediator in a cascade of cytokine production that involves TNFα, IL-1β, INFγ, endothelins and prostaglandins. This suggests that IL-33 may well have a more promiscuous role in T-cell-mediated inflammatory processes beyond that of Th2-dominated responses.
In patients, IL-33 is abundantly expressed in rheumatic synovium as measured by in situ hybridization38. Elevated sST2 levels have been found in the sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosis, progressive systemic sclerosis and in patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis or Behcet’s disease7, suggesting a role for the IL-33/ST2 system in a wider array of autoimmune diseases.
Sepsis and trauma
As has been recently reviewed, patients with severe trauma or systemic inflammatory syndromes demonstrate elevated serum levels of IL-4 and IL-10, and decreased levels of Th-1 cytokines; these biomarkers generally portend a worse prognosis74. Similarly, serum levels of sST2 were elevated in patients admitted to an intensive care unit with a diagnosis of sepsis or after sustaining significant trauma8.
It is possible that these elevations of serum sST2 are pathogenic, rather than simply a biomarker. Exogenous administration of sST2 to mice exposed to LPS, as a model of sepsis, resulted in reduced serum levels of IL-6, IL-12 and TNFα and increased survival69. Specifically, as pertains to the pulmonary effects of LPS challenge, pretreatment with sST2 reduced the expression of proinflammatory cytokines from murine alveolar macrophages in vitro75. Mice lacking the ST2 gene lack the ability to develop tolerance to repeated exposure to endotoxin48. Furthermore, the known protective effects of macrophage-activating lipopeptide 2 (MALP2) might operate through ST2L signalling76.
Malignancy
A possible association between ST2 and tumorigenesis was suggested by the induction of ST2 expression in growth-stimulated cells19,20,77. ST2 can also be stimulated by transgenic expression of HA-Ras in a mouse model of mammary adenocarcinoma, an apparent recapitulation of the mammary epithelial cell ontogeny that is induced by the HA-Ras oncoprotein78. In addition, levels of sST2 and the Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 were higher in pleural fluid obtained from patients with carcinomatous pleurisy compared with those with pulmonary effusions with a tuberculous or cardiac aetiology79. Although these data are suggestive, formal investigation of activation of the IL-33/ST2 system in human malignancies is lacking.
Cardiovascular disease
sST2 as a biomarker
In 2002, using microarrays, our laboratory noted that the transcript for ST2 was markedly upregulated in mechanically-stimulated cardiomyocytes. Both the transmembrane and soluble forms of ST2 were induced, with the soluble form displaying more robust expression80. In vivo, the cardiac ST2 transcript and serum ST2 protein were increased following the induction of myocardial infarction80. These experiments suggested that ST2 had the potential to be a biological marker for mechanical overload in the heart. Initial evidence for this was found in patients who had suffered an acute myocardial infarction, as serum ST2 levels were elevated one day post-event and declined thereafter; these ST2 levels correlated with serum creatine kinase, a standard marker of myocardial injury, and inversely correlated with left ventricular function80. As a result of this, sST2 levels were analysed in over 800 patients presenting to hospital with an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at several time points over the first day after presentation. sST2 levels at the time of presentation correlated with the incidence of in-hospital and 30-day mortality, even though these levels were much lower than subsequently measured values during hospitalization. Additionally, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the initial serum ST2 level was independently associated with the incidence of 30-day mortality after controlling for established clinical risk indicators in STEMI such as age, heart rate, blood pressure, infarct territory, Killip class and time from symptom onset to treatment81.
Mechanical overload of the myocardium is a feature of many types of heart failure, not only the loss of myocardium due to infarction. Based on this, a subsequent study analysed serum levels of ST2 in patients with non-ischaemic congestive heart failure (CHF) — defined as a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and severe symptoms with minimal exertion or at rest (New York Heart Association class III–IV). Serum levels of sST2 at the time of study entry correlated with serum noradrenaline levels, a marker of systemic neurohormonal activation, as well as serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. BNP is a useful biomarker in patients suffering from a myocardial infarction or heart failure with both prognostic and diagnostic utility. BNP is used routinely in clinical practice82. A rise in serum ST2 levels was found to independently predict the risk for reaching a subsequent endpoint of mortality or cardiac transplantation in a multivariate model that included measurements of the natriuretic peptides BNP and ANP83.
sST2 may also be an important biomarker in the hospital emergency room. The PRIDE study (or Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department), a prospective, blinded study of patients presenting to an emergency department with dyspnea, was initially conducted to validate the use of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing in differentiating acute CHF from other causes of shortness of breath84. However, in an analysis of blood samples from nearly 600 patients, serum concentrations of sST2 were significantly higher in those presenting with acute systolic heart failure compared with patients presenting with other causes of dyspnea. Patients with a serum sST2 level above the median of 0.23 ng per ml had an 11-fold increased risk for death at one year compared with patients with lower serum sST2 concentrations. When stratified by decile, patients in the lowest decile had a 1 year mortality of less than 5%, whereas those in the highest decile had a 1 year mortality of nearly 45%14.
Further studies have suggested that sST2 provides prognostic information that is independent of BNP. Analysis of serum samples from 1,200 patients enrolled in the Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy — Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (CLARITY-TIMI) 28 study, which studied patients presenting with an acute STEMI, showed that serum sST2 levels correlated with impaired epicardial coronary flow and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular death or CHF85. In a multivariate analysis, sST2 was independently predictive of cardiovascular death or CHF within 30 days of presentation. Patients presenting with STEMI with a baseline NT-pro-BNP in the highest quartile displayed an odds ratio of 2.4 for the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure at 30 days, whereas those with a baseline sST2 level in the highest quartile had an odds ratio of 3.6. Moreover, the sST2 quartile level was complementary in predicting the risk of downstream cardiovascular death or heart failure when added to the traditional model of TIMI-risk score and NT-pro-BNP quartile. The TIMI-risk score is a well-validated, clinical score which allows the clinician to predict the risk of mortality, recurrent infarction or ischaemia in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome86,87. In patients presenting with STEMI, but with a low TIMI-risk score, those with the highest quartile sST2 and NT-pro-BNP levels demonstrated a 6.6-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure at 30 days; this is equivalent to the risk afforded by a high TIMI-risk score. Patients with a high TIMI-risk score and highest quartile baseline sST2 and NT-pro-BNP levels had an ~25-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure88.
Although the above data suggest that sST2 has a role in ascertaining the prognosis of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, whether sST2 contributes to cardiovascular risk prediction in patients without active coronary disease remains unstudied. However, multi-marker prognostication is an area of active investigation. Recently, a study using data from the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM) registry, evaluated a cohort of more than 1,000 Swedish men over a follow-up period of 10 years89. When adding Troponin I, NT-pro-BNP, cystatin C and C-reactive protein to the standard cadre of prognostic indicators (including age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, presence of diabetes mellitus, smoking status and body mass index), the Cox regression model C statistic increased significantly. Furthermore, the fold increase in the risk of cardiovascular death rose in concert with the number of biomarkers elevated on baseline analysis, from a 3-fold increase with elevation in a single biomarker to a 16-fold increase with an elevation in all four biomarkers. How sST2 may contribute to the cardiovascular prognosis of patients in the general population remains to be investigated.
In summary, sST2 levels have repeatedly proven to be of potential value as a biomarker. Measurement of serum sST2 in patients presenting to a hospital emergency ward with acute dyspnea or myocardial infarction might provide useful prognostic information for stratifying care. In this sense, serum levels of sST2 might be used in conjunction with existing biomarkers such as BNP, which is routinely measured when patients present with these conditions.
IL-33/ST2 and heart disease
Most current pharmacotherapeutic strategies for heart failure treatment target systemic neurohormonal responses, including excessive compensatory renin–angiotensin and aldosterone signalling. Many of the available medications were initially approved for the treatment of hypertension but were later found to have beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcome following myocardial infarction or in heart failure. Indeed, it is surprising that relatively few heart failure therapies have arisen from an understanding of myocardial biology.
Pathological examination of human myocardial tissue after infarction documents a progressive inflammatory reaction. As classically described, a robust polymorphonuclear leukocyte response is observed within the first day after infarction, which is eventually replaced by lymphocytes, followed by macrophages over the ensuing week90,91. In animal models, manipulation of this inflammatory-cell infiltration results in attenuation of the severity of experimental infarction (reviewed in REF. 92). Early approaches to attenuate experimental infarction used corticosteroids in a non-selective anti-inflammatory maneuver93–96, but this failed to benefit patients97. More recent attempts to manipulate the inflammatory response to myocardial injury in humans have also been met with limited clinical success (reviewed in REF. 98). It is intriguing to consider the role that fibroblast-derived sST2 might have in leukocyte recruitment and leukocyte–fibroblast–myocyte crosstalk. There is evidence for CD4+ T-cell involvement in post-infarct inflammation99 as well as precedent evidence for TLR signalling in post-infarct ventricular remodelling100. The specific role that the IL-33/ST2 system might have in these inflammatory signalling cascades is yet to be determined.
Fibrosis and scar formation in the heart is a component of the maladaptive ventricular responses to injury101,102. It is thought that the interaction of myocytes and fibroblasts in the context of biomechanical overload leads to fibroblast proliferation and deposition of extracellular matrix, resulting in a reduction in ventricular compliance103–106. This stiffening of the myocardium increases pulmonary vascular and systemic venous pressures resulting in shortness of breath and peripheral oedema. Furthermore, a common cause of death in heart failure is a lethal arrhythmia, often the result of fibrosis-induced changes in ventricular myocardium or in the conduction system. Some of the most successful pharmacologic therapies for heart failure reduce ventricular fibrosis. For example, hyperactivity of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone neurohormonal axis results in end-organ fibrosis, and inhibition of this axis reduces cardiac fibrosis and improves outcome after myocardial infarction and in congestive heart failure107–110.
Although fibrosis and scar formation implies an interaction between cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts within the injured myocardium, the cellular and paracrine signalling mechanisms remain poorly defined. Evidence that sST2 is a biomarker for cardiac biomechanical strain suggests that the IL-33/ST2 system could be a potential pathophysiological mediator of this fibrosis.
Early experimental animal data suggested that the ST2 gene is expressed in osteogenic tissue in vitro111 and that sST2 resides in the extracellular matrix of integumental tissue33. These findings raise the possibility that ST2 is involved in the growth or homeostasis of matrix components. In terms of cardiovascular disease, possible involvement of sST2 in ventricular matrix remodelling has been suggested. Both cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes express IL-33 and sST2, and expression levels are increased by two well-characterized stimuli of cardiac fibrosis: biomechanical strain and angiotensin II80. In an in vivo model of ventricular pressure overload, partial aortic constriction enhances IL-33 protein expression in fibroblasts of the left ventricle. When these experiments were carried out in mice with germline deletion of ST2, increased ventricular fibrosis as well as cardiomyocyte hypertrophy ensued. Furthermore, enhanced chamber hypertrophy and reduced ejection fraction (a marker of ventricular function) were noted in ST2-null mice compared with wild-type mice. Treatment of wild-type mice with exogenous IL-33 reduced cardiac hypertrophy, reduced gene expression of BNP and increased survival after aortic constriction compared with untreated controls (FIG. 3). These data are indicative of a previously unrecognized cardioprotective role for IL-33/ST2 signalling in fibroblast–cardiomyocyte crosstalk during biomechanical overload12.
Figure 3. IL-33/ST2 signalling is a novel cardioprotective fibroblast–cardiomyocyte paracrine system.
Any condition that alters the geometry or loading conditions of the left ventricle of the heart might alter the mechanical strain exerted on each individual cardiomyocyte. Myocytes are able to sense these changes in biomechanical strain and respond to them101,105,169. Disease conditions that increase the stresses and strains on the ventricle, such as myocardial infarction, hypertension and valvular disease, result in hypertrophy of the myocytes and enhanced deposition of extracellular proteins (ventricular fibrosis), which, at least in the early adaptive phase of response, tends to normalize ventricular wall stress170. These responses ultimately prove maladaptive, leading towards clinical heart failure171–173. The IL-33/ST2 system is emerging as a novel fibroblast–cardiomyocyte communication system that might abrogate these maladaptive processes. In response to biomechanical strain both cardiac myocytes and cardiac fibroblasts produce mature IL-33, although fibroblasts appear to be the dominant source. When in vitro cardiomyocytes subjected to hypertrophic signals were exposed to IL-33, the hypertrophic response was reduced. Addition of soluble ST2 (sST2) reversed this inhibition of hypertrophy, suggesting that it might serve as a decoy receptor. sST2 can be produced by both cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes. The ventricles of mice can be subjected to overt pressure overload by surgically constricting their aortae. In such a model, exposure to IL-33 reduced the normal ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis that is seen as a consequence of the increased ventricular strain. Furthermore, the inevitable decrement in ventricular function and premature mortality noted in the mice subjected to ventricular pressure overload was reduced with IL-33 treatment12.
IL-33/ST2 and atherosclerosis
CD4+ cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic vascular disease (reviewed in REFS 112–114), and the presence of activated T-cells in human atherosclerotic lesions was documented over two decades ago115,116. It has been suggested that the clonal expansion of a subset of T-cells from an initially polyclonal T-cell population117 might underlie the transition from a stable to an unstable vascular plaque118. In both humans and mouse models of accelerated atherogenesis, CD4+ T-cells appear to be central to lesion progression119, and immunodeficiency reduces the atherosclerotic burden in most120–122 but not all123 murine models of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Macrophages, dendritic cells and smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic plaques express MHC class II receptors and may serve as antigen-presenting cells to effector T-cells in vascular lesions124. Numerous antigens have been suggested, with oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) attracting much attention125–127. These CD4-dependent, antigen-associated mechanisms of atherogenesis seem to act in parallel with antigen and CD4-independent mechanisms128–130.
Of the CD4+ subtypes, Th1 cells seem to dominate the atherosclerotic plaque, which may be decisive for lesion progression131,132. This is in agreement with the over-representation of the prototypical Th1 cytokines INFγ and IL-2 in atherosclerotic plaques133,134, the observation that enhanced INFγ exposure potentiates atherogenesis135–137, and that genetic inhibition of Th1 differentiation abrogates it138. Furthermore, levels of IL-18, a Th1-associated cytokine, correlate with plaque instability139. As immune responses are thought to result from a balance between Th1 and Th2 effects, with predilection of one response occurring at the expense of the other, it could be hypothesized that promoting a Th2 response might be protective. Some studies of the effects of IL-4 and IL-5 in atherogenesis appear to validate this140,141. However, experiments with Apolipoprotein E142 and LDL-receptor143 deficient mice that are also rendered IL-4 deficient have indicated a more complicated role for this cytokine, as in both instances lesion formation was reduced when compared with control mice. This might be due to the effects of IL-4 on extracellular matrix composition, specifically protease and elastase production and putative destabilization of vascular lesions144,145. As IL-33/ST2 could represent a parallel or augmentative path to Th2-cell differentiation and activation, the role of this system in atherogenesis was investigated. In mice with germline deletion of ApoE, leading to accelerated atherosclerosis146–148, IL-33 reduced aortic atherosclerotic plaque development and induced serum levels of antibodies to ox-LDL (FIG. 4). Conversely, administration of the decoy receptor, sST2, resulted in a significantly higher aortic plaque burden compared with control mice, theoretically due to inhibition of IL-33 signalling. Interestingly, treatment with a neutralizing antibody against IL-5 reversed the protective effect of IL-33 and blunted the induction of ox-LDL antibodies without affecting the overall lipid profile of the animals. Plaque content of macrophages, T-cells, smooth muscle cell and collagen was similar between the treated and untreated groups13. Previously published data suggest that IL-5 might induce athero-protective ox-LDL antibodies141. Collectively, these data suggest that IL-33 may be exerting its anti-atherosclerotic effect by inducing IL-5-stimulated ox-LDL antibody production.
Figure 4. IL-33/ST2 reduces atheroma formation.
Atherosclerosis has been described as a chronic inflammatory disease of the vascular wall, characterized by a type I T-cell response to oxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL), as well as other antigens. It is this active inflammation that is thought to underlie the instability of some atherosclerotic lesions, leading to plaque rupture, subsequent clot formation, vessel lumen occlusion and the resultant downstream tissue infarction113,114. One strategy to inhibit the vascular inflammation of atherosclerosis might be to shift the balance towards Th2 immune-cell activation. The IL-33/ST2 system could be one pathway towards inducing this shift in balance. Mice lacking the gene for apolipoprotein E fed a high-fat diet have high serum cholesterol levels and develop atherosclerosis. When these mice are treated with IL-33, they display reduced aortic atherosclerotic plaque burden and lower levels of serum antibodies to oxidized LDL compared with control mice. Furthermore, when pre-treated with sST2 before IL-33 exposure, these mice display increased atherosclerosis compared with those not treated with soluble ST2; this is consistent with the anti-IL-33 effect of the soluble isoform of ST2.
Thus, in both heart failure and atherosclerosis, IL-33 signalling appears beneficial, and sST2 might act as a decoy receptor to reduce IL-33 signalling through the ST2L receptor. This idea is consistent with sST2 representing a biomarker for worse prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Manipulation of the IL-33/ST2 system
ST2 has long been regarded as a novel therapeutic target in the development of pharmacotherapy for inflammatory diseases such as asthma and rheumatoid arthritis. Although approaches to regulate the IL-33/ST2 system have not yet entered the clinical arena, examples of the potential benefits of ST2 administration in the treatment of arthritis and sepsis have been reported. However, given the involvement of the IL-33/ST2 system in the wide variety of processes discussed above, strategies aimed to inhibit the IL-33/ST2 pathway to treat common inflammatory diseases must be followed with caution, as they could have unintended consequences. The finding of a cardioprotective role for IL-33/ST2 signalling exemplifies this. It is unlikely that inhibition of the IL-33/ST2 system would have a major impact on the unstressed cardiovascular system, but in patients with increased cardiac biomechanical overload, such as in those suffering from myocardial infarction or heart failure, or perhaps even as subtle as that in patients with mild hypertension, the risk for cardiovascular morbidity could potentially be increased (FIG. 5). Recently, therapeutics such as rofecoxib (Vioxx) and rosiglitazone (Avandia) have come under scrutiny for their ability to increase cardiac morbidity; an effect that was theorized but never fully explored until post-marketing studies were conducted149–152. If history is to be a lesson, the potential untoward cardiac effects of IL-33-based anti-inflammatory therapeutics should be thoroughly investigated as part of drug development.
Figure 5. Strategies and consequences of IL-33/ST2 modulation.
Stimulation of the IL-33/ST2 system might activate a cardioprotective programme in the context of ventricular biomechanical stress12,80 and a number of approaches could be taken to modulate IL-33/ST2 signalling to capitalize on this cardioprotective activity. The IL-33 system may be activated by exogenous administration of IL-33 or by promoting IL-33 release from resident cardiac fibroblasts. Alternatively, availability of IL-33 to its receptor complex could be increased by inhibiting the IL-33 decoy receptor soluble ST2 (sST2). The system could also be activated by pharmacotherapeutics designed to directly stimulate the IL-33 receptor. Intracellular targeting may also be possible: Sequestration of the myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) by exogenous compounds might mimic the cardioprotective effects of IL-33 administration. If further clarity could be obtained regarding the nature and means by which IL-33 modulates nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activity, or with regard to the contribution of NF-κB-independent effects (such as direct stimulation of adaptor protein 1 (AP-1) or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)) to overall cardioprotection, these may also prove to be points along the IL-33 signalling cascade that are amenable to manipulation. Precisely how the nuclear and non-nuclear effects of IL-33 result in downstream cardioprotection is unclear. Further study into these processes could help identify novel methods of cardioprotection. Due to the involvement of the IL-33/ST2 system in a variety of processes, activation of this pathway may have unintended consequences. The involvement of IL-33 in Th2-mediated inflammation suggests that such a strategy might result in exacerbation of arthritic, asthmatic, rheumatologic and gastrointestinal inflammatory conditions. Conversely, inhibition of the IL-33/ST2 system to modulate these inflammatory conditions could result in increased cardiovascular injury in the face of ventricular strain. Care must be taken if the IL-33/ST2 system is to be manipulated for potential clinical gain.
As indicated, increasing IL-33/ST2 signalling might invoke a cardioprotective effect. Based on current understanding of the system, this could be accomplished by a number of ways. These include, direct administration of IL-33 or strategies to enhance cardiac fibroblast IL-33 release, administration of an ST2L agonist or sST2 antagonist, or administration of a molecule designed to sequester adaptor proteins such as MyD88 or MAL100,153–156. Brint and colleagues have demonstrated that ST2L negatively regulates TLR-4 signalling by sequestering the adaptor protein MyD88 upon endotoxin challenge48. Abrogation of myocardial ischaemic damage, post-infarct ventricular maladaptation and pressure-overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy have been noted in most, though not all, animal models deficient in TLR-4100,153–155. This process also appears to involve sequestering of MyD88 (REF. 156). Thus, it is possible that MyD88 represents a common point in the cardioprotective signalling of ST2L and TLR-4. These data raise the hypothesis that selective sequestration of MyD88 with a small molecule might exert a cardioprotective effect. This approach has yet to be experimentally validated. Elucidation of the precise cytosolic and intranuclear effects of ST2L signalling might uncover unique cardiovascular targets for drug development. Again, caution must be taken when pursuing stimulation of IL-33/ST2 signalling, as a therapeutic strategy: it is possible that supraphysiologic IL-33/ST2 activation may yield undesirable results such as the exacerbation of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis and certain collagen vascular diseases. These limitations might require the development of site-specific delivery systems. However, the degree of inflammation that is induced by IL-33 therapy may depend upon the dose and the duration of therapy12, thus it is possible that transient IL-33 therapy could improve cardiovascular outcomes with minimal instigation of undesirable inflammatory reactions. Our preliminary data indicate that a brief course of IL-33 can in fact prevent cardiomyocyte apoptosis and improve outcome after experimental myocardial infarction without pulmonary inflammation (unpublished observations).
Concluding remarks
IL-33/ST2 has emerged as an intercellular signalling system that participates in processes as varied as the antigen/allergen response, autoimmunity, organ fibrosis and cardiac injury. Exploration of the effects of this pathway is underway. An effort to clarify the role of IL-33/ST2 in the crosstalk between end-organ effector cells and their environment, specifically the surrounding matrix and inflammatory cells, may lend itself to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of diseases such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis and heart failure.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the reviewers for their invaluable advice.
Glossary
- Th2 cells
A subset of the T-cell pool hypothesized to drive an immune response that is characterized by production of interleukin-4, -5,-6 and -10 (among others) in response to extracellular pathogens
- Cytokines
Small proteins released by cells of the immune system for the purpose of intercellular crosstalk. Interleukins, derived specifically from leukocytes, are a subset of these proteins
- Th1 cells
A subset of the T-cell pool hypothesized to drive an immune response that is characterized by the production of interleukin-2 and interferon-γ (among others) in response to intracellular pathogens
- Fibrosis
Process by which normal tissue is replaced with scar tissue, mostly consisting of extracellular proteins produced by fibroblasts
- Atherosclerotic vascular disease
A disease that is pathologically defined by the formation of lipid-rich lesions within the artery wall and which results in luminal narrowing and loss of vascular elasticity. It is characterized by a significant T-cell and macrophage inflammatory response to oxidized low-density lipoprotein
- The Toll-like/IL-1-receptor superfamily
A superfamily of related cytokine receptors. They are similar in that they contain a common intracellular domain, the Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain
- Expressed Sequence Tag
(EST). Short, unique sequence of DNA that can be used to identify the larger gene transcript of which it is a part of. It is created by sequencing mRNA that represents a portion of the expressed sequence of a gene. ESTs have been used extensively to identify new genes within the genome
- High endothelial venules
Post-capillary tissue involved in leukocyte extravasation from lymphoid tissue
- Autocrine, paracrine and endocrine
Describe the type of interaction between a cell, its secreted compound and the affected target cell. Autocrine effects are those in which the effector cell is of the same type as the target cell. Paracrine effects are those in which the secreted protein exerts its effect on cells within the local vicinity of the effector cell. Endocrine effects are those which occur at a distance (the effector cell secretes its proteins into the blood stream)
- Angiotensin II
A protein that circulates in the bloodstream and exerts a myriad of physiological effects. Effects of angiotensin II include arterial vasoconstriction, renal blood filtration and sodium absorption, cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and ventricular fibrosis, platelet aggregation, adrenal aldosterone secretion and increased thirst sensation in the brain
- Cardiomyocytes
Specialized, striated muscle cells of the heart. These cells are contiguous with one another, allowing the rapid transmission of chemical and electrical signals between them. An extracellular matrix of proteins, secreted by resident fibroblasts, serves to both mechanically bind them and transduce information about the extracellular environment
- Decoy receptors
Proteins that can bind the ligand of functional cellular receptors, effectively reducing the concentration of ligand that is available to the active receptor
- Antigen
Substance which can induce an immune response. Generally it is a fragment of a protein or polysaccharide that is derived from a structural component of a pathogen, such as a component of the bacterial cell wall
- Sepsis
A pattern of body-wide responses to overwhelming infection. It is characterized by alteration in core body temperature, vasodilation with attendant drop in blood pressure and rise in heart rate, and leukocyte response. These responses are thought to be mediated by the release of inflammatory cytokines
- Endotoxin
A lipopolysaccaride within the gram-negative bacterial cell wall that upon infection may instigate sepsis, septic shock and its associated complications
- Myocardial infarction
Term used to describe the death of heart tissue due to a loss of blood supply
- STEMI
Term used to describe the most severe type of heart attack. Defined by elevation of the ‘ST-segment’ on the standard electrocardiogram, this entity is typified by complete occlusion of a coronary artery and subsequent death of downstream cardiac tissue
- The Killip classification
A risk stratification system developed by Killip and colleagues in 1967 after a two-year observation of an unselected group of 250 patients presenting to hospital with myocardial infarction. It employs physical exam findings consistent with heart failure or cardiogenic shock to categorize patients into one of four classes. The class assigned correlates with mortality at 30 days after the infarction
- Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Protein that is released from ventricular myocardial cells under stress or strain. It is cleaved from its precursor pro-BNP along with N-terminal-pro-BNP. Its biological effects include systemic vasoconstriction and renal sodium loss
- Odds ratio
Ratio of the odds of an outcome among exposed individuals compared with the odds of the outcome among unexposed individuals
- C statistic
A quantitative measure of the ability of a test to discriminate between two cohorts, typically those with and without a disease. The C statistic varies between 0.5 and 1.0, with a higher value denoting better discriminatory power. For binary outcomes, C is identical to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, or a plot of sensitivity (SN) versus one minus specificity (1-SP) of the test in question
- Antigen-presenting cell
Cell which processes and presents antigen on its cell surface to effector immune cells, for example, T-cells. The antigen is displayed within a specialized protein receptor, known as the major histocompatibility complex, along with other co-receptors that are necessary for effector immune cell activation
- Apolipoprotein E
(ApoE). A protein component of some lipoproteins. Lipoproteins are conglomerates of proteins and lipids that serve to shuttle fat and cholesterol through the bloodstream. ApoE allows its lipoproteins to be taken up by the liver as part of the normal process of lipid clearance from the blood. ApoE-null mice have high blood levels of cholesterol and display spontaneous atherosclerosis
Footnotes
Competing interests statement
The authors declare competing financial interests: see web version for details.
Contributor Information
Rahul Kakkar, Email: rkakkar@partners.org.
Richard T. Lee, Email: rlee@partners.org.
References
- 1.Sims JE. IL-1 and IL-18 receptors, and their extended family. Curr Opin Immunol. 2002;14:117–122. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(01)00306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tominaga S. A putative protein of a growth specific cDNA from BALB/c-3T3 cells is highly similar to the extracellular portion of mouse interleukin 1 receptor. FEBS Lett. 1989;258:301–304. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81679-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trajkovic V, Sweet MJ, Xu D. T1/ST2 — an IL-1 receptor-like modulator of immune responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;15:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meisel C, et al. Regulation and function of T1/ST2 expression on CD4+ T cells: induction of type 2 cytokine production by T1/ST2 cross-linking. J Immunol. 2001;166:3143–3150. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oshikawa K, et al. Elevated soluble ST2 protein levels in sera of patients with asthma with an acute exacerbation. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2001;164:277–281. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2008120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leung BP, Xu D, Culshaw S, McInnes IB, Liew FY. A novel therapy of murine collagen-induced arthritis with soluble T1/ST2. J Immunol. 2004;173:145–150. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuroiwa K, Arai T, Okazaki H, Minota S, Tominaga S. Identification of human ST2 protein in the sera of patients with autoimmune diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284:1104–1108. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brunner M, et al. Increased levels of soluble ST2 protein and IgG1 production in patients with sepsis and trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1468–1473. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2184-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barksby HE, Lea SR, Preshaw PM, Taylor JJ. The expanding family of interleukin-1 cytokines and their role in destructive inflammatory disorders. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;149:217–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03441.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schmitz J, et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23:479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015. This study identifies IL-33 as the functional ligand of ST2L, documenting the production of Th2-related cytokines both in vitro and in vivo. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dinarello CA. An IL-1 family member requires caspase-1 processing and signals through the ST2 receptor. Immunity. 2005;23:461–462. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sanada S, et al. IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1538–1549. doi: 10.1172/JCI30634. This was the first study to suggest that IL-33 might act as a fibroblast–cardiomyocyte signalling system. IL-33 was found to be upregulated in fibroblasts when they were subjected to biomechanical strain and to modulate cardiomyocyte NF-κB levels, resulting in resistance to the effects of cardiac pressure overload injury in the in vivo model. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miller AM, et al. IL-33 reduces the development of atherosclerosis. J Exp Med. 2008;205:339–346. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071868. This study documents the anti-atherosclerotic effect of exogenous IL-33 administration in the ApoE-null mouse, a model of accelerated atherogenesis. This effect is suggested to be mediated through a shift from a Th1 to a Th2 immune response. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Januzzi JL, Jr, et al. Measurement of the interleukin family member ST2 in patients with acute dyspnea: results from the PRIDE (Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:607–613. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.014. This study builds upon previous data regarding sST2 as a cardiac biomarker, suggesting that serum levels of sST2 might be sensitive enough to distinguish between cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes of shortness of breath in patients presenting to the emergency ward. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu Y, et al. Structural basis for signal transduction by the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domains. Nature. 2000;408:111–115. doi: 10.1038/35040600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Michelsen KS, Doherty TM, Shah PK, Arditi M. TLR signaling: an emerging bridge from innate immunity to atherogenesis. J Immunol. 2004;173:5901–5907. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.10.5901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abreu MT, Arditi M. Innate immunity and toll-like receptors: clinical implications of basic science research. J Pediatr. 2004;144:421–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.01.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O’Neill LA, Bowie AG. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature Rev Immunol. 2007;7:353–364. doi: 10.1038/nri2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Werenskiold AK, Hoffmann S, Klemenz R. Induction of a mitogen-responsive gene after expression of the Ha-ras oncogene in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:5207–5214. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klemenz R, Hoffmann S, Werenskiold AK. Serum- and oncoprotein-mediated induction of a gene with sequence similarity to the gene encoding carcinoembryonic antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:5708–5712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Werenskiold AK. Characterization of a secreted glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin superfamily inducible by mitogen and oncogene. Eur J Biochem. 1992;204:1041–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takagi T, et al. Identification of the product of the murine ST2 gene. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1178:194–200. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(93)90009-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yanagisawa K, Takagi T, Tsukamoto T, Tetsuka T, Tominaga S. Presence of a novel primary response gene ST2L, encoding a product highly similar to the interleukin 1 receptor type 1. FEBS Lett. 1993;318:83–87. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81333-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iwahana H, et al. Different promoter usage and multiple transcription initiation sites of the interleukin-1 receptor-related human ST2 gene in UT-7 and TM12 cells. Eur J Biochem. 1999;264:397–406. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bergers G, Reikerstorfer A, Braselmann S, Graninger P, Busslinger M. Alternative promoter usage of the Fos-responsive gene Fit-1 generates mRNA isoforms coding for either secreted or membrane-bound proteins related to the IL-1 receptor. EMBO J. 1994;13:1176–1188. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06367.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thomassen E, et al. Role of cell type-specific promoters in the developmental regulation of T1, an interleukin 1 receptor homologue. Cell Growth Differ. 1995;6:179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gachter T, Werenskiold AK, Klemenz R. Transcription of the interleukin-1 receptor-related T1 gene is initiated at different promoters in mast cells and fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:124–129. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.1.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tominaga S, et al. Presence and expression of a novel variant form of ST2 gene product in human leukemic cell line UT-7/GM. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;264:14–18. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Iwahana H, et al. Molecular cloning of the chicken ST2 gene and a novel variant form of the ST2 gene product, ST2LV. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1681:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lohning M, et al. T1/ST2 is preferentially expressed on murine Th2 cells, independent of interleukin 4, interleukin 5, and interleukin 10, and important for Th2 effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6930–6935. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yanagisawa K, et al. The expression of ST2 gene in helper T cells and the binding of ST2 protein to myeloma-derived RPMI8226 cells. J Biochem. 1997;121:95–103. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu D, et al. Selective expression of a stable cell surface molecule on type 2 but not type 1 helper T cells. J Exp Med. 1998;187:787–794. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.5.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rossler U, et al. Secreted and membrane-bound isoforms of T1, an orphan receptor related to IL-1-binding proteins, are differently expressed in vivo. Dev Biol. 1995;168:86–97. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kumar S, Tzimas MN, Griswold DE, Young PR. Expression of ST2, an interleukin-1 receptor homologue, is induced by proinflammatory stimuli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;235:474–478. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tago K, et al. Tissue distribution and subcellular localization of a variant form of the human ST2 gene product, ST2V. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;285:1377–1383. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kumar S, Minnich MD, Young PR. ST2/T1 protein functionally binds to two secreted proteins from Balb/c 3T3 and human umbilical vein endothelial cells but does not bind interleukin 1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:27905–27913. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.46.27905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baekkevold ES, et al. Molecular characterization of NF-HEV, a nuclear factor preferentially expressed in human high endothelial venules. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:69–79. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63631-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carriere V, et al. IL-33, the IL-1-like cytokine ligand for ST2 receptor, is a chromatin-associated nuclear factor in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:282–287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606854104. This study documents the intranuclear properties of IL-33. IL-33 was found to be heterochromatin-associated in human endothelial cells, exerting a repressive effect on DNA transcription. The authors identify a conserved N-terminal motif that is necessary and sufficient for targeting IL-33 to the nucleus. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sharma S, et al. The IL-1 family member 7b translocates to the nucleus and down-regulates proinflammatory cytokines. J Immunol. 2008;180:5477–5482. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gadina M, Jefferies CA. IL-33: a sheep in wolf’s clothing? Sci STKE. 2007;390:pe31. doi: 10.1126/stke.3902007pe31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Keller M, Ruegg A, Werner S, Beer HD. Active caspase-1 is a regulator of unconventional protein secretion. Cell. 2008;132:818–831. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nature Immunol. 2001;2:675–680. doi: 10.1038/90609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Palmer G, et al. The IL-1 receptor accessory protein (AcP) is required for IL-33 signaling and soluble AcP enhances the ability of soluble ST2 to inhibit IL-33. Cytokine. 2008;42:358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chackerian AA, et al. IL-1 receptor accessory protein and ST2 comprise the IL-33 receptor complex. J Immunol. 2007;179:2551–2555. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2551. This study characterizes the IL-33 receptor as ST2L and the IL-1R accessory protein (IL-1RAcP) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ali S, et al. IL-1 receptor accessory protein is essential for IL-33-induced activation of T lymphocytes and mast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:18660–18665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705939104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Funakoshi-Tago M, et al. TRAF6 is a critical signal transducer in IL-33 signaling pathway. Cell Signal. 2008;20:1679–1686. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brint EK, et al. Characterization of signaling pathways activated by the interleukin 1 (IL-1) receptor homologue T1/ST2. A role for Jun N-terminal kinase in IL-4 induction. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:49205–49211. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209685200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brint EK, et al. ST2 is an inhibitor of interleukin 1 receptor and Toll-like receptor 4 signaling and maintains endotoxin tolerance. Nature Immunol. 2004;5:373–379. doi: 10.1038/ni1050. This study suggests that ST2L negatively regulates TLR-4 signalling by sequestering the adaptor proteins MAL and MyD88. Furthermore, ST2-null mice did not develop tolerance to repeated LPS exposure. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kondo Y, et al. Administration of IL-33 induces airway hyperresponsiveness and goblet cell hyperplasia in the lungs in the absence of adaptive immune system. Int Immunol. 2008;20:791–800. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Oshikawa K, Yanagisawa K, Tominaga S, Sugiyama Y. Expression and function of the ST2 gene in a murine model of allergic airway inflammation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32:1520–1526. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01494.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hayakawa H, Hayakawa M, Kume A, Tominaga S. Soluble ST2 blocks interleukin-33 signaling in allergic airway inflammation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:26369–26380. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704916200. The anti-IL-33 effects of sST2 are clarified in this study. Specifically, sST2 is shown to bind IL-33 and suppress activation of NF-κB, as well as abrogate the expression of Th2-associated cytokines. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Komai-Koma M, et al. IL-33 is a chemoattractant for human Th2 cells. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:2779–2786. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kropf P, et al. Expression of Th2 cytokines and the stable Th2 marker ST2L in the absence of IL-4 during Leishmania major infection. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:3621–3628. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11<3621::AID-IMMU3621>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kopf M, et al. Disruption of the murine IL-4 gene blocks Th2 cytokine responses. Nature. 1993;362:245–248. doi: 10.1038/362245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hoshino K, et al. The absence of interleukin 1 receptor-related T1/ST2 does not affect T helper cell type 2 development and its effector function. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1541–1548. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.10.1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Townsend MJ, Fallon PG, Matthews DJ, Jolin HE, McKenzie AN. T1/ST2-deficient mice demonstrate the importance of T1/ST2 in developing primary T helper cell type 2 responses. J Exp Med. 2000;191:1069–1076. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.6.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kropf P, et al. Identification of two distinct subpopulations of Leishmania major-specific T helper 2 cells. Infect Immun. 2002;70:5512–5520. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5512-5520.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ying S, et al. Expression of IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA and protein product by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, eosinophils, and mast cells in bronchial biopsies obtained from atopic and nonatopic (intrinsic) asthmatics. J Immunol. 1997;158:3539–3544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hogan SP, et al. A novel T cell-regulated mechanism modulating allergen-induced airways hyperreactivity in BALB/c mice independently of IL-4 and IL-5. J Immunol. 1998;161:1501–1509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Coyle AJ, et al. Crucial role of the interleukin 1 receptor family member T1/ST2 in T helper cell type 2-mediated lung mucosal immune responses. J Exp Med. 1999;190:895–902. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.7.895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lambrecht BN, et al. Myeloid dendritic cells induce Th2 responses to inhaled antigen, leading to eosinophilic airway inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:551–559. doi: 10.1172/JCI8107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Allakhverdi Z, Smith DE, Comeau MR, Delespesse G. Cutting edge: The ST2 ligand IL-33 potently activates and drives maturation of human mast cells. J Immunol. 2007;179:2051–2054. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Moulin D, et al. Interleukin (IL)-33 induces the release of pro-inflammatory mediators by mast cells. Cytokine. 2007;40:216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Oshikawa K, et al. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia with increased soluble ST2 in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Respir Med. 2001;95:532–533. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wynn TA. Fibrotic disease and the TH1/TH2 paradigm. Nature Rev Immunol. 2004;4:583–594. doi: 10.1038/nri1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tajima S, et al. ST2 gene induced by type 2 helper T cell (Th2) and proinflammatory cytokine stimuli may modulate lung injury and fibrosis. Exp Lung Res. 2007;33:81–97. doi: 10.1080/01902140701198583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tajima S, Oshikawa K, Tominaga S, Sugiyama Y. The increase in serum soluble ST2 protein upon acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2003;124:1206–1214. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Amatucci A, et al. Recombinant ST2 boosts hepatic Th2 response in vivo. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82:124–132. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1006625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sweet MJ, et al. A novel pathway regulating lipopolysaccharide-induced shock by ST2/T1 via inhibition of Toll-like receptor 4 expression. J Immunol. 2001;166:6633–6639. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wynn TA. Common and unique mechanisms regulate fibrosis in various fibroproliferative diseases. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:524–529. doi: 10.1172/JCI31487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Miltenburg AM, van Laar JM, de Kuiper R, Daha MR, Breedveld FC. T cells cloned from human rheumatoid synovial membrane functionally represent the Th1 subset. Scand J Immunol. 1992;35:603–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1992.tb03260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dolhain RJ, van der Heiden AN, ter Haar NT, Breedveld FC, Miltenburg AM. Shift toward T lymphocytes with a T helper 1 cytokine-secretion profile in the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1961–1969. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Verri WA, Jr, et al. IL-33 mediates antigen-induced cutaneous and articular hypernociception in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2723–2728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712116105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Miller AC, Rashid RM, Elamin EM. The “T” in trauma: the helper T-cell response and the role of immunomodulation in trauma and burn patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:1407–1417. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815b839e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Oshikawa K, Yanagisawa K, Tominaga S, Sugiyama Y. ST2 protein induced by inflammatory stimuli can modulate acute lung inflammation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;299:18–24. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02578-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Feterowski C, et al. Attenuated pathogenesis of polymicrobial peritonitis in mice after TLR2 agonist pre-treatment involves ST2 up-regulation. Int Immunol. 2005;17:1035–1046. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Klemenz R, Hoffmann S, Jaggi R, Werenskiold AK. The v-mos and c-Ha-ras oncoproteins exert similar effects on the pattern of protein synthesis. Oncogene. 1989;4:799–803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rossler U, Andres AC, Reichmann E, Schmahl W, Werenskiold AK. T1, an immunoglobulin superfamily member, is expressed in H-ras-dependent epithelial tumours of mammary cells. Oncogene. 1993;8:609–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Oshikawa K, Yanagisawa K, Ohno S, Tominaga S, Sugiyama Y. Expression of ST2 in helper T lymphocytes of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1005–1009. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2105109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Weinberg EO, et al. Expression and regulation of ST2, an interleukin-1 receptor family member, in cardiomyocytes and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;106:2961–2966. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000038705.69871.D9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shimpo M, et al. Serum levels of the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2 predict mortality and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109:2186–2190. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127958.21003.5A. This study establishes sST2 as a cardiac biomarker, documenting a correlation between sST2 levels in patients presenting to hospital with myocardial infarction and the chance of death or of developing heart failure. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Daniels LB, Maisel AS. Natriuretic peptides. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2357–2368. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Weinberg EO, et al. Identification of serum soluble ST2 receptor as a novel heart failure biomarker. Circulation. 2003;107:721–726. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000047274.66749.fe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Januzzi JL, Jr, et al. The N-terminal Pro-BNP investigation of dyspnea in the emergency department (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:948–954. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sabatine MS, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1179–1189. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Morrow DA, et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation. 2000;102:2031–2037. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.17.2031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Antman EM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284:835–842. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.7.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sabatine MS, et al. Complementary roles for biomarkers of biomechanical strain, ST2 and NT-proBNP, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117:1936–1944. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zethelius B, et al. Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2107–2116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mallory G, White P, Salcedo-Salgar J. The speed of healing of myocardial infarction: a study of the pathologic anatomy in seventy-two cases. Am Heart J. 1939;18:647–671. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Fishbein MC, Maclean D, Maroko PR. The histopathologic evolution of myocardial infarction. Chest. 1978;73:843–849. doi: 10.1378/chest.73.6.843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Frangogiannis NG, Smith CW, Entman ML. The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular Res. 2002;53:31–47. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00434-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hepper NG, Pruitt RD, Donald DE, Edwards JE. The effect of cortisone on experimentally produced myocardial infarcts. Circulation. 1955;11:742–748. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.11.5.742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Johnson AS, Scheinberg SR, Gerisch RA, Saltzstein HC. Effect of cortisone on the size of experimentally produced myocardial infarcts. Circulation. 1953;7:224–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Libby P, Maroko PR, Bloor CM, Sobel BE, Braunwald E. Reduction of experimental myocardial infarct size by corticosteroid administration. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:599–607. doi: 10.1172/JCI107221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Opdyke DF, Lambert A, Stoerk HC, Zanetti ME, Kuna S. Failure to reduce the size of experimentally produced myocardial infarcts by cortisone treatment. Circulation. 1953;8:544–548. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.8.4.544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Roberts R, DeMello V, Sobel BE. Deleterious effects of methylprednisolone in patients with myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1976;53:I204–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1121–1135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yang Z, et al. Myocardial infarct-sparing effect of adenosine A2A receptor activation is due to its action on CD4+ T lymphocytes. Circulation. 2006;114:2056–2064. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.649244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Timmers L, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates maladaptive left ventricular remodeling and impairs cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2008;102:257–264. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.158220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Diez J, Gonzalez A, Lopez B, Querejeta R. Mechanisms of disease: pathologic structural remodeling is more than adaptive hypertrophy in hypertensive heart disease. Nature Clin Pract Cadiovasc Med. 2005;2:209–216. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.McKinsey TA, Olson EN. Toward transcriptional therapies for the failing heart: chemical screens to modulate genes. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:538–546. doi: 10.1172/JCI24144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Marian AJ. Pathogenesis of diverse clinical and pathological phenotypes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2000;355:58–60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Baudino TA, Carver W, Giles W, Borg TK. Cardiac fibroblasts: friend or foe? Am J Physiol. 2006;291:H1015–1026. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00023.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Sadoshima J, Izumo S. The cellular and molecular response of cardiac myocytes to mechanical stress. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:551–571. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Manabe I, Shindo T, Nagai R. Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: involvement in cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2002;91:1103–1113. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000046452.67724.b8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Dzau VJ, Re R. Tissue angiotensin system in cardiovascular medicine. A paradigm shift? Circulation. 1994;89:493–498. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.1.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Klug D, Robert V, Swynghedauw B. Role of mechanical and hormonal factors in cardiac remodeling and the biologic limits of myocardial adaptation. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:46A–54A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90245-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pouleur H. Role of neurohormones in ventricular adaptation and failure. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:36C–39C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90621-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Weber KT, Brilla CG. Pathological hypertrophy and cardiac interstitium. Fibrosis and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Circulation. 1991;83:1849–1865. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.6.1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Werenskiold AK, et al. Bone matrix deposition of T1, a homologue of interleukin 1 receptors. Cell Growth Differ. 1995;6:171–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Robertson AK, Hansson GK. T cells in atherogenesis: for better or for worse? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2421–2432. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000245830.29764.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1685–1695. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Hansson GK, Libby P. The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword. Nature Rev Immunol. 2006;6:508–519. doi: 10.1038/nri1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Jonasson L, Holm J, Skalli O, Bondjers G, Hansson GK. Regional accumulations of T cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:131–138. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.6.2.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Hansson GK, Holm J, Jonasson L. Detection of activated T lymphocytes in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Am J Pathol. 1989;135:169–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Stemme S, Rymo L, Hansson GK. Polyclonal origin of T lymphocytes in human atherosclerotic plaques. Lab Invest. 1991;65:654–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Liuzzo G, et al. Monoclonal T-cell proliferation and plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2000;101:2883–2888. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Roselaar SE, Kakkanathu PX, Daugherty A. Lymphocyte populations in atherosclerotic lesions of apoE−/− and LDL receptor−/− mice. Decreasing density with disease progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:1013–1018. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.16.8.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zhou X, Nicoletti A, Elhage R, Hansson GK. Transfer of CD4+ T cells aggravates atherosclerosis in immunodeficient apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Circulation. 2000;102:2919–2922. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.24.2919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Reardon CA, et al. Effect of immune deficiency on lipoproteins and atherosclerosis in male apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1011–1016. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.21.6.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Song L, Leung C, Schindler C. Lymphocytes are important in early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:251–259. doi: 10.1172/JCI11380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Dansky HM, Charlton SA, Harper MM, Smith JD. T and B lymphocytes play a minor role in atherosclerotic plaque formation in the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:4642–4646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Glass CK, Witztum JL. Atherosclerosis the road ahead. Cell. 2001;104:503–516. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Palinski W, et al. Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modification in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:1372–1376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, Witztum JL. Beyond cholesterol. Modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:915–924. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904063201407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Witztum JL. The oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1994;344:793–795. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92346-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Nakajima T, et al. De novo expression of killer immunoglobulin-like receptors and signaling proteins regulates the cytotoxic function of CD4 T cells in acute coronary syndromes. Circ Res. 2003;93:106–113. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000082333.58263.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Tupin E, et al. CD1d-dependent activation of NKT cells aggravates atherosclerosis. J Exp Med. 2004;199:417–422. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zhou X, Robertson AK, Rudling M, Parini P, Hansson GK. Lesion development and response to immunization reveal a complex role for CD4 in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2005;96:427–434. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000156889.22364.f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Frostegard J, et al. Cytokine expression in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques: dominance of pro-inflammatory (Th1) and macrophage-stimulating cytokines. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145:33–43. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Uyemura K, et al. Cross-regulatory roles of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-10 in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2130–2138. doi: 10.1172/JCI118650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Lee TS, Yen HC, Pan CC, Chau LY. The role of interleukin 12 in the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:734–742. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.3.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Buono C, et al. Influence of interferon-γ on the extent and phenotype of diet-induced atherosclerosis in the LDLR-deficient mouse. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:454–460. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000059419.11002.6E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Gupta S, et al. IFN-γ potentiates atherosclerosis in ApoE knock-out mice. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2752–2761. doi: 10.1172/JCI119465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Whitman SC, Ravisankar P, Elam H, Daugherty A. Exogenous interferon-gamma enhances atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E−/− mice. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:1819–1824. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64820-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Mallat Z, et al. Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 binding protein signaling modulates atherosclerotic lesion development and stability. Circ Res. 2001;89:E41–E45. doi: 10.1161/hh1901.098735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Buono C, et al. T-bet deficiency reduces atherosclerosis and alters plaque antigen-specific immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1596–1601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409015102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Mallat Z, et al. Expression of interleukin-18 in human atherosclerotic plaques and relation to plaque instability. Circulation. 2001;104:1598–1603. doi: 10.1161/hc3901.096721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Huber SA, Sakkinen P, David C, Newell MK, Tracy RP. T helper-cell phenotype regulates atherosclerosis in mice under conditions of mild hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2001;103:2610–2616. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.21.2610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Binder CJ, et al. IL-5 links adaptive and natural immunity specific for epitopes of oxidized LDL and protects from atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:427–437. doi: 10.1172/JCI20479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Davenport P, Tipping PG. The role of interleukin-4 and interleukin-12 in the progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1117–1125. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63471-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.King VL, Szilvassy SJ, Daugherty A. Interleukin-4 deficiency decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation in a site-specific manner in female LDL receptor−/− mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:456–461. doi: 10.1161/hq0302.104905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Shimizu K, Shichiri M, Libby P, Lee RT, Mitchell RN. Th2-predominant inflammation and blockade of IFN-γ signaling induce aneurysms in allografted aortas. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:300–308. doi: 10.1172/JCI19855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Leskinen MJ, Kovanen PT, Lindstedt KA. Regulation of smooth muscle cell growth, function and death in vitro by activated mast cells--a potential mechanism for the weakening and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:1493–1498. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00503-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Piedrahita JA, Zhang SH, Hagaman JR, Oliver PM, Maeda N. Generation of mice carrying a mutant apolipoprotein E gene inactivated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:4471–4475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Plump AS, et al. Severe hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice created by homologous recombination in ES cells. Cell. 1992;71:343–353. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90362-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zhang SH, Reddick RL, Piedrahita JA, Maeda N. Spontaneous hypercholesterolemia and arterial lesions in mice lacking apolipoprotein E. Science. 1992;258:468–471. doi: 10.1126/science.1411543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Bresalier RS, et al. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1092–1102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Kerr DJ, et al. Rofecoxib and cardiovascular adverse events in adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:360–369. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Home PD, et al. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes — an interim analysis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:28–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–2471. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Riad A, et al. Toll-like receptor-4 modulates survival by induction of left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice. J Immunol. 2008;180:6954–6961. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.10.6954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Ha T, et al. Reduced cardiac hypertrophy in toll-like receptor 4-deficient mice following pressure overload. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;68:224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Hua F, et al. Protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in TLR4-deficient mice is mediated through a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2007;178:7317–7324. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Zhu X, et al. MyD88 and NOS2 are essential for toll-like receptor 4-mediated survival effect in cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol. 2006;291:H1900–H1909. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00112.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Boraschi D, Tagliabue A. The interleukin-1 receptor family. Vitam Horm. 2006;74:229–254. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(06)74009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Watters TM, Kenny EF, O’Neill LA. Structure, function and regulation of the Toll/IL-1 receptor adaptor proteins. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85:411–419. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;124:783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Priestle JP, Schar HP, Grutter MG. Crystallographic refinement of interleukin 1β at 2.0 Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:9667–9671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Allan SM, Tyrrell PJ, Rothwell NJ. Interleukin-1 and neuronal injury. Nature Rev Immuno. 2005;5:629–640. doi: 10.1038/nri1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Nicklin MJ, et al. A sequence-based map of the nine genes of the human interleukin-1 cluster. Genomics. 2002;79:718–725. doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Taylor SL, Renshaw BR, Garka KE, Smith DE, Sims JE. Genomic organization of the interleukin-1 locus. Genomics. 2002;79:726–733. doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Dale M, Nicklin MJ. Interleukin-1 receptor cluster: gene organization of IL1R2, IL1R1, IL1RL2 (IL-1Rrp2), IL1RL1 (T1/ST2), and IL18R1 (IL-1Rrp) on human chromosome 2q. Genomics. 1999;57:177–179. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Farrar JD, Asnagli H, Murphy KM. T helper subset development: roles of instruction, selection, and transcription. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:431–435. doi: 10.1172/JCI15093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Smithgall MD, et al. IL-33 amplifies both Th1- and Th2-type responses through its activity on human basophils, allergen-reactive Th2 cells, iNKT and NK cells. Int Immunol. 2008 Jun 11; doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Cherry WB, Yoon J, Bartemes KR, Iijima K, Kita H. A novel IL-1 family cytokine, IL-33, potently activates human eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:1484–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Palmer G, et al. The IL-1 receptor accessory protein (AcP) is required for IL-33 signaling and soluble AcP enhances the ability of soluble ST2 to inhibit IL-33. Cytokine. 2008;42:358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Hill JA, Olson EN. Cardiac plasticity. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1370–1380. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest. 1975;56:56–64. doi: 10.1172/JCI108079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Mann DL, Bristow MR. Mechanisms and models in heart failure: the biomechanical model and beyond. Circulation. 2005;111:2837–2849. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.500546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Frey N, Olson EN. Cardiac hypertrophy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003;65:45–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Jessup M, Brozena S. Heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2007–2018. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





