Skip to main content
Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy logoLink to Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy
. 2014 Dec 1;33(6):378–385. doi: 10.1089/mab.2014.0041

Proteoliposome-based Selection of a Recombinant Antibody Fragment Against the Human M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

Suharni 1, Yayoi Nomura 1,,2,,3, Takatoshi Arakawa 1,,2, Tomoya Hino 1,,2, Hitomi Abe 1, Yoshiko Nakada-Nakura 1,,3, Yumi Sato 1,,3, Hiroko Iwanari 4, Mitsunori Shiroishi 1,,2, Hidetsugu Asada 1,,2,,3, Tatsuro Shimamura 1,,2,,3, Takeshi Murata 1,,2,,5, Takuya Kobayashi 1,,2,,3, Takao Hamakubo 4, So Iwata 1,,2,,3,,5,,6, Norimichi Nomura 1,,2,,3,
PMCID: PMC4278166  PMID: 25545206

Abstract

The development of antibodies against human G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has achieved limited success, which has mainly been attributed to their low stability in a detergent-solubilized state. We herein describe a method that can generally be applied to the selection of phage display libraries with human GPCRs reconstituted in liposomes. A key feature of this approach is the production of biotinylated proteoliposomes that can be immobilized on the surface of streptavidin-coupled microplates or paramagnetic beads and used as a binding target for antibodies. As an example, we isolated a single chain Fv fragment from an immune phage library that specifically binds to the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor with nanomolar affinity. The selected antibody fragment recognized the GPCR in both detergent-solubilized and membrane-embedded forms, which suggests that it may be a potentially valuable tool for structural and functional studies of the GPCR. The use of proteoliposomes as immunogens and screening bait will facilitate the application of phage display to this difficult class of membrane proteins.

Introduction

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest class of signal-transducing receptors involved in a broad range of physiological processes, ranging from cell cycle control to metabolism and the actions of hormones.(1,2) GPCR dysfunctions have been implicated in various pathological processes including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, metabolic, neurodegenerative, psychiatric, and immune disorders as well as cancers. More than 30% of all clinically approved therapeutics currently target GPCRs.(3) As our understanding of GPCR-associated disease pathology increases, the need for new antibodies related to receptor characterization, purification, tissue localization, clinical diagnostics, and therapeutics is also growing.

However, raising antibodies against GPCRs is technically challenging for the following reasons: (1) the poor immunogenicity of GPCRs, which are largely buried in the membrane, (2) the high degree of sequence homology between human and mouse genes, (3) the low density of GPCRs in native cell membranes, (4) the difficulties associated with obtaining sufficient amounts of the purified GPCRs expressed in heterologous hosts, and (5) most GPCRs in detergent-solubilized state are unstable and are likely to aggregate easily, such that denatured proteins and aggregation may cause non-specific binding during the selection of antibodies, thereby producing false positives. Furthermore, antibodies against GPCR-derived peptides rarely recognize native receptors and have adequate affinities or specificities, because the linear peptide does not necessarily replicate the loop in the complete GPCR structure. An approach using purified human GPCRs in reconstituted liposomes as binding targets may overcome these problems.

Phage display technology offers an attractive strategy to facilitate the isolation of novel antibody fragments. The process is easier, faster, and less labor intensive than traditional hybridoma technology, in which significant expertise and time-consuming cell culture steps are needed to accomplish the desired antibody selection. Antibody phage libraries have been constructed under various settings, including naïve, synthetic, and immunized libraries.(4) Most high-quality naïve and synthetic libraries are proprietary or not yet commercially available, and it is also difficult to maintain highly complex diversity (109–1012 independent clones) during propagation in a routine laboratory.(5,6) In contrast, the construction and selection of immune libraries is a promising starting point because a smaller library size (5×105–1×106 clones) has been shown to be sufficient for isolating high affinity binders.(7,8) Consecutive rounds of immunization and in vivo affinity maturation by the murine immune system are likely to result in a high frequency of antigen-specific B-cells, producing large amounts of antibodies and the corresponding mRNAs used for the generation of the focused library.

The M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M2 receptor) is a GPCR that has an essential role in the physiological control of cardiovascular function and many pivotal central processes, such as cognition and pain perception.(9) Due to its importance in medical and basic biological research, we selected the human M2 receptor as a model target in this study. Here we demonstrate the isolation of a single chain Fv (scFv) fragment against the human M2 receptor using a proteoliposome-targeted strategy in both animal immunization and the subsequent selection of an immune phage display library. We also describe simple and reliable methods used to characterize the binding properties of the selected antibody.

Materials and Methods

Proteoliposome antigen preparation

A variant of the human M2 receptor, M2-i3d, which lacks the central part of the third intracellular loop (ICL3) from Ser234 to Arg381 as well as the native glycosylation sites, was expressed in Sf9 insect cells, as described previously.(10) After solubilizing the membrane with digitonin/Na-cholate solution, M2-i3d bound to the high-affinity inverse agonist 3-quinuclidinyl-benzilate (QNB) was purified by using an aminobenztropine (ABT) affinity column and hydroxyapatite column, as previously described.(11) The eluate was concentrated with Amicon Ultra (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA) and dialyzed against 20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.05% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DDM, Anatrace, Maumee, OH), and 0.01% cholesterol hemisuccinate (CHS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Proteoliposomes were prepared by removing the detergent from mixed lipid/detergent micelles using Bio-Beads SM-2 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Briefly, 1 mg of purified QNB-bound M2-i3d was added to a mixture of 4 mg of egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (egg PC, Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) and 1 mg of adjuvant Lipid A (Sigma-Aldrich) in 1 mL of PBS containing 0.8% sodium cholate (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). This was immediately followed by the addition of fresh Bio-Beads SM-2 and overnight incubation at 4°C. After removing the beads, the resultant suspensions were sonicated to produce small unilamellar vesicles. The reconstituted proteoliposome was stored at −80°C prior to use for immunization.

Immunization and antibody library construction

All animal experiments described in this study conformed to the guidelines outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Japan and were approved by the University of Tokyo Animal Care Committee (approval no. RAC07101). M2 and M4 receptor double knockout mice were initially immunized with 0.1 mg of the proteoliposome antigen and 0.1 μg of pertussis toxin, followed by two or three booster injections of 0.1 mg of the proteoliposome antigen at 2-week intervals. Immunized mice were sacrificed, and total RNA in the spleen was isolated using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using an oligo (dT) primer and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA) in a standard procedure.(12) A combinatorial single-chain Fv (scFv) antibody library was generated by PCR amplification and the assembly of VL and VH immunoglobulin domains with an 18 amino acid flexible linker, and was then cloned into the phagemid vector pComb3XSS, as previously described.(13)

Proteoliposome-targeted panning of combinatorial scFv library

Biotinylated proteoliposomes were used as the target for selection and were prepared by the same method as that for the proteoliposome antigen described above, except that 0.5 mg/mL of the membrane protein was reconstituted with a mixture of 5 mg/mL of egg PC and 25 μg/mL of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(cap biotinyl) (16:0 biotinyl Cap-PE, Avanti Polar Lipids). To perform negative selection steps (i.e., subtractive panning on an otherwise equivalent system that lacks the target membrane protein), “empty” biotinylated liposomes were prepared with egg PC and 16:0 biotinyl Cap-PE.

All steps of the phage display selection were performed at 4°C or on ice. In the first selection cycle, 2×1013 phage particles displaying the scFv library (1 mL) were incubated for 1 h with empty biotinylated liposomes (200 μL; 50 μg/mL lipid in TBS-B buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% BSA]). Phage-empty liposome complexes were captured on 100 μL streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads (10 mg/mL, Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin T1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h. The supernatant (1 mL) was collected and incubated with the biotinylated proteoliposome bait (200 μL; 50 μg/mL lipid and 5 μg/mL membrane protein in TBS-B) for 1 h. The phage-proteoliposome complexes were captured on the beads for 30 min. After washing the beads eight times with TBS-B, the phage particles were eluted with 100 μL of 100 mM glycine-HCl (pH 2.5) for 10 min. Eluates were neutralized with 5 μL of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0) and used to infect 2 mL of exponentially growing Escherichia coli XL-1 Blue cells (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). After shaking for 1 h at 37°C, cells were plated on LB agar plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and grown overnight at 37°C. The cells were scraped off the plates, and phage rescue was performed using the VCSM13 helper phage (Agilent Technologies) according to a standard method described previously.(14)

In the subsequent selection rounds, 1012 of the amplified phage particles were used as an input, and beads were washed 10–15 times with TBS-B. After the fourth round, single clones were randomly picked and analyzed by a proteoliposome-targeted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (liposome ELISA; Fig. 1A) as described below, and the positive clones were sequenced.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Proteoliposome-targeted ELISA (liposome ELISA) to test the binding of selected scFv clones after recursive phage display cycles. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental set-up. Biotinylated liposomes were captured in streptavidin-immobilized ELISA plates, and E. coli periplasmic extracts containing HA-tagged scFv for each clone were added. ScFv binding was detected with an anti-HA IgG-horseradish peroxidase conjugate. (B) Representative results of liposome ELISA. Solid bar, M2-i3d proteoliposome-targeted signal (binding); open bar, empty liposome-targeted signal (background). Clones marked with an asterisk were selected as positives and sequenced.

Liposome ELISA

E. coli XL-1 Blue, harboring pComb3XSS encoding a selected scFv, was grown overnight at 37°C. Two mL of SB (20 g tryptone, 10 g yeast extract, 5 g NaCl per liter) containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin was inoculated with 50 μL of the overnight culture. After being incubated for 3 h at 37°C, expression was induced with IPTG (1 mM final concentration) and cells were grown at 30°C overnight with vigorous shaking. Cells were harvested, and the periplasmic extract was prepared by suspending the cells in an ice-cold high osmotic buffer (50 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 7.5], 0.5 mM EDTA, 20% sucrose), followed by the addition of lysozyme (3 mg/mL final concentration) and incubation for 30 min at 37°C. The bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 10 min, and the scFv-containing supernatant was used for liposome ELISA, Biacore analysis, and epitope mapping. The scFv had a HA tag at the C-terminus.

Biotinylated proteoliposome bait (25 μL; 200 μg/mL lipid, and 20 μg/mL membrane protein in TBS-B) or biotinylated empty liposomes (25 μL; 200 μg/mL lipid in TBS-B) were mixed with 100 μL of the E. coli periplasmic extract and incubated for 1 h on ice. The scFv-liposome complex was applied to a well of a Nunc Immobilizer Streptavidin plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and further incubated for 30 min on ice. After extensive washing with TBS, bound scFv was detected with the anti-HA antibody POD conjugate (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland; 1:1000 dilution in TBS-B, 1 h on ice) using ABTS (Sigma-Aldrich) as a substrate for POD. The absorbance of the color reaction was measured at 415 nm with a microplate reader (model 680, Bio-Rad).

Binding kinetics measurements

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments were performed at 20°C using Biacore T100 with streptavidin sensor chips (Series S sensor chip SA, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) in the running buffer containing 20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.05% DDM, and 0.01% CHS. Biotinylated anti-HA IgG (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA) was captured on the streptavidin surface (flow cells 1 and 2) by a 400-s injection of 50 μg/mL of the antibody at 10 μL/min. Crude scFv-containing E. coli periplasmic extracts with 12 mg/mL BSA and 12 mg/mL CM-dextran were subsequently injected (500 μL at a flow rate of 10 μL/min) over flow cell 2, in which the C-terminal HA-tagged scFvs were captured. QNB-bound M2-i3d at various concentrations was simultaneously passed over flow cells 1 and 2 at a flow rate of 30 μL/min. Association and dissociation times were 2 and 5 min, respectively, and regeneration consisted of a 30-s injection of 10 mM NaOH. Flow cell 1 was used as a reference surface. Data analysis was performed using BIAevaluation software (GE Healthcare).

Epitope mapping

The variants used for epitope mapping on M2-i3d are summarized in Table 1. Site-directed mutagenesis was conducted following a PCR-based protocol(15) or in vivo homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.(16) Different DNA fragments encoding M2-i3d and its variants were inserted into the vector pDDGFP-2,(17) and all the expression constructs were verified by DNA sequencing of the entire gene through the ligation junctions with the vector plasmid. The resultant constructs with a C-terminal fusion to GFP were overexpressed in S. cerevisiae, and membranes from small scale (10 mL) cultures were prepared by the mechanical disruption of cells, which was achieved by shaking with glass beads, as previously described.(18)

Table 1.

M2 Receptor Variants Used for Epitope Mapping

Variant Description Position of mutated segment or residuea Original sequence or residue in M2-i3d Replaced sequence or residue
M2-Nr Replacement in extracellular N-distal domain 2–22 DDSTDSSDNSLALTSPYKTFE TDDPLGGHTVWQ
M2-i1r Replacement in ICL1 51–59 NRHLQTVNN DKQLKTVDD
M2-o1r Replacement in ECL1 86–95 IGYWPLGPVV MNRWALGNLA
M2-i2r Replacement in ICL2 124–139 CVTKPLTYPVKRTTKM SITRPLTYRAKRSTKR
M2-o2r Replacement in ECL2 164–183 FIVGVRTVEDGECYIQFFSN YFVGKRTVPPGECFIQFLSE
M2-i3r Replacement in ICL3 215–383 (234–381 deleted) SRIKKDKKEPVANQDPVSPEK RQLQKIDKSEGRFHVQNLSQVEQDGRTGHGLRRSSKFCLKEH
M2-o3r Replacement in ECL3 414–419 APCIPN DSCVPK
M2-Cr Replacement in intracellular C-distal domain 445–466 ATFKKTFKHLLMCHYKNIGATR KT
S215A Alanine scanning mutagenesis within ICL3 215 S A
R216A 216 R A
I217A 217 I A
K218A 218 K A
K219A 219 K A
D220A 220 D A
K221A 221 K A
K222A 222 K A
E223A 223 E A
P224A 224 P A
V225A 225 V A
N227A 227 N A
D229A 229 D A
V231A 231 V A
a

Amino acid residues were numbered according to the same numbering scheme for full-length sequence of human muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (UniProt # P08172).

A Nunc Maxisorp plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was coated with the membrane fractions containing an equivalent amount of M2-i3d and its variants in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4°C overnight and blocked for 2 h with PBS-B (PBS [pH 7.4] containing 1% BSA) at 4°C. The wells were incubated with 100 μL of HA-tagged scFv (10 μg/mL) in PBS-B for 1 h at 4°C. The bound HA-tagged scFv was detected as described above.

Results

Library construction and selection

M2-i3d was used as a binding target throughout the present study because the central part of ICL3 in the human M2 receptor can be removed without impairing its ability to bind to agonists or activate G proteins.(19) Functional and folded proteins were specifically retrieved by ABT affinity column chromatography, and the purified M2-i3d used in proteoliposome reconstitution was in an inactive antagonist-bound conformation.

Among the five different muscarinic receptors, subtypes M1–M5, that have been cloned and characterized, the primary sequences of subtypes M2 and M4 are more homologous to each other than to other subtypes. In addition, the M2 and M4 receptors couple efficiently to inhibit cyclic AMP,(20) suggesting similarities in the functional tertiary structures of the two subtypes. To abrogate the mechanisms of immune tolerance, two M2/M4 double knockout mice were immunized with M2-i3d-reconstituted liposomes to generate a library of murine immunoglobulin genes. To facilitate the immune response, adjuvant lipid A was added as an ingredient to the proteoliposomes.(21) The sera obtained from mice became immunoreactive after the third or fourth immunization, as indicated by liposome ELISA (data not shown). Animals were sacrificed 3 days after the last immunization, and a scFv phage library was prepared. The library consisted of approximately 2.9×108 independent transformants.

Liposomes were immobilized via a biotinylated lipid on streptavidin-coupled paramagnetic beads for phage panning. Four rounds of subtractive screening were performed using M2-i3d-proteoliposomes and empty liposomes devoid of M2-i3d, and phages that specifically bound to M2-i3d were retrieved and isolated. Ninety-six randomly chosen colonies were grown for the expression of their scFvs as soluble proteins. Crude periplasmic extracts were assessed using liposome ELISA, and 32 extracts recognized the M2-i3d-proteoliposomes but not the empty liposomes (Fig. 1B). Sequence analysis revealed only one scFv (Fig. 2). This scFv, designated as 18A107, was recloned for large scale expression, purification, and characterization.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Nucleotide and amino acid deduced sequences of scFv 18A107. The two SfiI restriction sites are represented in gray. The complementarity determining region (CDR) of 18A107 antibody according to Kabat numbering are underlined, and 18-residue linker between light and heavy variable domains is in italic.

Binding kinetics

In conducting SPR assays (Biacore), knowledge of the analyte concentration is a prerequisite for a detailed kinetic analysis. The purified GPCR was available in the present study, and using a crude E. coli periplasmic extract was sufficient for immobilizing the scFv on the sensor chip (e.g., an immobilized anti-HA antibody could also be used to capture the scFv with a HA tag at the C-terminus). Therefore, we devised a SPR assay in which purified M2-i3d was flowed over the immobilized scFvs in detergent-containing buffer (Fig. 3A).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

SPR analysis of interaction between scFv 18A107 and detergent-solubilized M2-i3d. (A) Capture assay format used on Biacore T100. Biotinylated anti-HA IgG (B-IgG) was immobilized in both flow cells 1 and 2 of a streptavidin (SA)-coated sensor chip. ScFvs (scFv-HA) were subsequently captured in flow cell 2. Flow cell 1 was used as reference surface. M2-i3d was passed over each flow cell simultaneously for 2 min, and dissociation of M2-i3d in buffer was monitored for 5 min. (B) Sensorgrams (red) and fitted curves (black) for M2-i3d binding to captured scFv clone 18A107. Detergent-solubilized QNB-bound M2-i3d was injected at 1, 2, 4, or 8 μg/mL, and the data were fit to a 1:1 model.

Approximately 2000 RU of the biotinylated anti-HA antibody was immobilized on the surfaces of flow cells 1 and 2. The scFv 18A107-containing crude periplasmic extract was injected over the predefined anti-HA immobilized sensor surface (flow cell 2), which resulted in capture responses of approximately 150 RU. QNB-bound M2-i3d at concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 μg/mL was flowed over both flow cells. The kinetic parameters for scFv18A107 with QNB-bound M2-i3d interactions were examined (Fig. 3B). ScFv 18A107 showed high affinity to QNB-bound M2-i3d:

graphic file with name eq1.gif

Epitope mapping

GPCRs have seven hydrophobic transmembrane helices and eight hydrophilic extramembrane regions; anti-GPCR antibodies should bind to one or more of the extramembranous parts of GPCRs. To identify the epitope of scFv 18A107, each polypeptide segment located within the extracellular N-distal or intracellular C-distal domains or within the extra- or intracellular loops of M2-i3d was replaced with an arbitrary sequence to construct M2-Nr, M2-i1r, M2-o1r, M2-i2r, M2-o2r, M2-i3r, M2-o3r, and M2-Cr variants (Table 1). The expression of the resultant variants in S. cerevisiae was verified using the in-gel fluorescence of GFP as previously described(17) (data not shown). Aliquots of membrane fractions from these variants were directly immobilized on a MaxiSorp plate to perform an ELISA. ScFv 18A107 could recognize these variants, except for M2-i3r (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the epitope is located within the ICL3.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Mapping of scFv 18A107 epitope on M2-i3d by crude membrane-targeted ELISA. (A) Identification of critical hydrophilic domains of M2-i3d for binding to scFv. To facilitate interpretation, ELISA signals were background-subtracted and normalized to M2-i3d reactivity with Fv. Results are the mean±s.d. from three independent experiments. Mock, reactivity against the membrane fraction from yeast cells harboring the pDDGFP-2 empty vector. (B) Detailed mapping of the epitope. Immunoreactivities of scFv against a series of M2-i3d variants containing alanine-scanning mutations within ICL3 are shown. Error bars, s.d.; n=3. (C) Sequence alignments of a segment within the ICL3 of the five subtypes of human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and mammalian counterparts of subtype M2. Numbers correspond to the residue number used in the UniProt data P08172. The epitope recognized by Fv 18A107 is underlined.

Detailed mapping of the epitope was conducted by alanine scanning mutagenesis within the ICL3 (Table 1). The amino acid substitutions K219A, D220A, K222A, E223A, P224A, V225A, and N227A resulted in significant loss in scFv 18A107 reactivity (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that the side chain of the residue Lys221 may not have contributed to the contact with scFv 18A107. Similar results were obtained in Western blot experiments using SDS-denatured variant proteins (data not shown). Thus, the epitope of scFv 18A107 could be defined as a peptide segment from Lys219 to Asn227 within the ICL3. This amino acid sequence does not exist in the other subtypes of muscarinic receptor (Fig. 4C), suggesting the high specificity of scFv 18A107 on the M2 receptor.

Discussion

Human and mammalian GPCRs typically exhibit limited thermal stability once solubilized from the hydrophobic environment of the lipid bilayer by a detergent. Thus, the use of detergent-solubilized purified GPCRs as binding targets may lead to difficulties in maintaining the structural integrity of the GPCRs during the antibody selection process, and additional intricate strategies may be required to exclude false positives that recognize denatured GPCRs and their aggregates. In contrast, proteoliposome-targeted strategies have been used in anti-GPCR antibody screening via traditional hybridoma technology to successfully identify monoclonal antibodies against the human β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR),(21,22) human orphan receptor RAI3 (also known as GPRC5A and RAIG-1),(23) and human adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR).(24) Fab fragments to the β2AR and A2AR were used as “crystallization chaperones”(25–28) to facilitate structural determination.

In this context, we utilized this proteoliposome-based strategy to devise an efficient method for anti-GPCR antibody production via phage display technology. Using the human M2 receptor as a model target, we succeeded in isolating a high-affinity Fv fragment without further affinity maturation procedures. The whole process, from the immunization to the isolation of a single scFv, was completed within a short period of time (∼10 weeks). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate proteoliposome-targeted selection from a focused phage library built from immunized mice to isolate anti-GPCR antibodies. A similar approach has been used for the non-GPCR target, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-selective glutamate receptor GluRD,(29) which has large extramembranous hydrophilic domains unlike GPCRs. The procedures we established in this study may be useful for obtaining specific binders against human and mammalian GPCRs as well as other integral membrane proteins, especially those with low thermal stability.

The selected recombinant antibody fragment Fv 18A107 could recognize the M2 receptor in its detergent-solubilized form, as well as that embedded in lipid bilayers. Due to this versatility and high affinity for the M2 receptor, this Fv can be used in various applications such as purification, immunoprecipitation, or immunohistochemistry. Crystallization trials of M2-i3d complexed with Fv 18A107 were unsuccessful despite extensive screening, which may have been because binding via a linear epitope does not stabilize one specific conformation of the M2 receptor. The epitope was located within the ICL3, which is known to be important for G-protein activation, and Fv 18A107 may have prevented coupling of the M2 receptor to the G protein due to steric competition. The intracellular expression of scFv18A107 as an “intrabody”(30) may become a novel type of antagonist that inhibits signaling pathways downstream of G-protein activation.

In conclusion, we obtained a high-affinity recombinant scFv against the human M2 receptor using proteoliposome-based technology with no further in vitro affinity maturation, which demonstrates that our approach can be used to generate binders to GPCRs and other integral membrane proteins.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Carlos F. Barbas III (Scripps Research Institute) for making the pComb3XSS vector available, Dr. Minoru Matsui (Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo) for providing M2 and M4 receptor double knockout mice, and members of the Iwata Laboratory for their helpful suggestions. This work was supported by the ERATO Human Receptor Crystallography Project of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (to S.I.), by the Research Acceleration Program of JST (to S.I.), by the Targeted Proteins Research Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (to S.I.), by the Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science from the MEXT (to T.K.), and by Grants-in-Aids for Scientific Research from the MEXT (no. 22570114 to N.N. and no. 24121715 to T.S.). Suharni is a recipient of the Indonesian Government Scholarship (no. 668/D4-4/2010).

Author Disclosure Statement

The authors have no financial interests to disclose.

References

  • 1.Fredriksson R, Lagerström MC, Lundin LG, and Schiöth HB: The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol Pharmacol 2003;63:1256–1272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wettschureck N, and Offermanns S: Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. Physiol Rev 2005;85:1159–1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, and Hopkins AL: How many drug targets are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5:993–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoogenboom HR: Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:1105–1116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goletz S, Christensen PA, Kristensen P, Blohm D, Tomlinson I, Winter G, and Karsten U: Selection of large diversities of antiidiotypic antibody fragments by phage display. J Mol Biol 2002;315:1087–1097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knappik A, Ge L, Honegger A, Pack P, Fischer M, Wellnhofer G, Hoess A, Wölle J, Plückthun A, and Virnekäs B: Fully synthetic human combinatorial antibody libraries (HuCAL) based on modular consensus frameworks and CDRs randomized with trinucleotides. J Mol Biol 2000;296:57–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peipp M, Simon N, Loichinger A, Baum W, Mahr K, Zunino SJ, and Fey GH: An improved procedure for the generation of recombinant single-chain Fv antibody fragments reacting with human CD13 on intact cells. J Immunol Methods 2001;251:161–176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schwemmlein M, Peipp M, Barbin K, Saul D, Stockmeyer B, Repp R, Birkmann J, Oduncu F, Emmerich B, and Fey GH: A CD33-specific single-chain immunotoxin mediates potent apoptosis of cultured human myeloid leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol 2006;133:141–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wess J, Eglen RM, and Gautam D: Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: mutant mice provide new insights for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007;6:721–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asada H, Uemura T, Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Shiroishi M, Shimamura T, Tsujimoto H, Ito K, Sugawara T, Nakane T, Nomura N, Murata T, Haga T, Iwata S, and Kobayashi T: Evaluation of the Pichia pastoris expression system for the production of GPCRs for structural analysis. Microb Cell Fact 2011;10:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haga K, Kruse AC, Asada H, Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Shiroishi M, Zhang C, Weis WI, Okada T, Kobilka BK, Haga T, and Kobayashi T: Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist. Nature 2012;482:547–551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sambrook J, and Russell DW. (Eds.): Molecular Cloning : A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barbas CF, III, Kang AS, Lerner RA, and Benkovic SJ: Assembly of combinatorial antibody libraries on phage surfaces: the gene III site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:7978–7982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barbas CF, III, Burton DR, Scott JK, and Silverman GJ: Phage Display: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, and Pease LR: Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 1989;77:51–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ito K, Sugawara T, Shiroishi M, Tokuda N, Kurokawa A, Misaka T, Makyio H, Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Shimamura T, Nomura N, Murata T, Abe K, Iwata S, and Kobayashi T: Advanced method for high-throughput expression of mutated eukaryotic membrane proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;371:841–845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drew D, Newstead S, Sonoda Y, Kim H, von Heijne G, and Iwata S: GFP-based optimization scheme for the overexpression and purification of eukaryotic membrane proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Protoc 2008;3:784–798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shiroishi M, Tsujimoto H, Makyio H, Asada H, Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Shimamura T, Murata T, Nomura N, Haga T, Iwata S, and Kobayashi T: Platform for the rapid construction and evaluation of GPCRs for crystallography in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2012;11:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kameyama K, Haga K, Haga T, Moro O, and Sadee W: Activation of a GTP-binding protein and a GTP-binding-protein-coupled by a muscarinic receptor m2 mutant lacking phosphorylation sites. Eur J Biochem 1994;276:267–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hulme E: Muscarinic receptor subtypes. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1990;30:633–673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Day PW, Rasmussen SGF, Masood A, Parnot C, Jose J, Kobilka TS, Yao XJ, Choi HJ, Weis WI, Rohrer DK, and Kobilka BK: A monoclonal antibody for G protein–coupled receptor crystallography. Nat Methods 2007;4:927–929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rasmussen SGF, Choi HJ, Rosenbaum DM, Kobilka TS, Thian FS, Edwards PC, Burghammer M, Ratnala VRP, Sanishvili R, Fischetti RF, Schertler GFX, Weis WI, and Kobilka BK: Crystal structure of the human β2 adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 2007;450:383–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jörissen H, Bektas N, Dahl E, Hartmann A, ten Haaf A, Di Fiore S, Kiefer H, Thess A, Barth S, and Klockenbring T: Production and characterisation of monoclonal antibodies against RAI3 and its expression in human breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2009;9:200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hino T, Arakawa T, Iwanari H, Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Ikeda-Suno C ON.akada-Nakura Y, Kusano-Arai O, Weyand S, Shimamura T, Nomura N, Cameron AD, Kobayashi T, Hamakubo T, Iwata S, and Murata T: G-protein-coupled receptor inactivation by an allosteric inverse-agonist antibody. Nature 2012;482:237–240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hino T, Iwata S, and Murata T: Generation of functional antibodies for mammalian membrane protein crystallography. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013;23:563–568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hunte C, and Michel H: Crystallisation of membrane proteins mediated by antibody fragments. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:503–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Koide S: Engineering of recombinant crystallization chaperones. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009;19:449–457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lieberman RL, Culver JA, Entzminger KC, Pai JC, and Maynard JA: Crystallization chaperone strategies for membrane proteins. Methods 2011;55:293–302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jespersen LK, Kuusinen A, Orellana A, Keinänen K, and Engberg J: Use of proteoliposomes to generate phage antibodies against native AMPA receptor. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:1382–1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lo AS, Zhu Q, and Marasco WA: Intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) and their therapeutic potential. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2008;181:343–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES