Skip to main content
Oncoscience logoLink to Oncoscience
. 2014 Jul 23;1(7):486–503. doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.64

Adaptors for disorders of the brain? The cancer signaling proteins NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B in Alzheimer's disease

Tim N Beck 1,2, Emmanuelle Nicolas 1, Meghan C Kopp 1,2, Erica A Golemis 1,2
PMCID: PMC4278314  PMID: 25594051

Abstract

No treatment strategies effectively limit the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a common and debilitating neurodegenerative disorder. The absence of viable treatment options reflects the fact that the pathophysiology and genotypic causes of the disease are not well understood. The advent of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has made it possible to broadly investigate genotypic alterations driving phenotypic occurrences. Recent studies have associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in two paralogous scaffolding proteins, NEDD9 and CASS4, and the kinase PTK2B, with susceptibility to late-onset AD (LOAD). Intriguingly, NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B have been much studied as interacting partners regulating oncogenesis and metastasis, and all three are known to be active in the brain during development and in cancer. However, to date, the majority of studies of these proteins have emphasized their roles in the directly cancer relevant processes of migration and survival signaling. We here discuss evidence for roles of NEDD9, CASS4 and PTK2B in additional processes, including hypoxia, vascular changes, inflammation, microtubule stabilization and calcium signaling, as potentially relevant to the pathogenesis of LOAD. Reciprocally, these functions can better inform our understanding of the action of NEDD9, CASS4 and PTK2B in cancer.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, Neurodegenerative, Brain, Cancer, NEDD9, HEF1, CASS4, HEPL, PTK2B, PYK2, RAFTK, CAK-β, CAS, Tau, Amyloid, APP, PSEN1, PSEN2

INTRODUCTION

Roles in cancer and tumor metastasis are well established for the two paralogous scaffolding proteins NEDD9 (neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 9; also known as HEF1 or Cas-L) and CASS4 (Cas scaffolding protein family member 4; also known as HEPL), and for their interacting partner, the kinase PTK2B (protein tyrosine kinase type 2 beta; also known as PYK2, Cak2β, or RAFTK) [1-4]. Based on early identification of these proteins as regulators of integrin-dependent signaling governing survival, proliferation, migration, and invasion, and the recognition of NEDD9 as a major determinant of cancer metastasis [4-8], the majority of subsequent analyses emphasized their cancer-related roles involving these functions. Unexpectedly, recent genetic studies have implicated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each of these genes in a completely different domain: Alzheimer's disease [9-14]. In part because independent research groups performed these studies, the fact that three closely interacting proteins have all been linked to increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease has not been appreciated, limiting consideration of relevant mechanisms by which defects in these proteins might affect disease pathogenesis.

The pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease is known to reflect important contributions from vascular defects, hypoxia and calcium signaling, microtubular integrity, and inflammation. Interestingly, over the past two decades, several studies have identified roles for NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B in these processes, but this literature is typically underappreciated in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, in contrast to the focus on this signaling cluster in cancer and metastasis. In this article, we first introduce the pathological features of Alzheimer's disease, and describe recent data linking NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B to this syndrome. We then summarize signaling activities of these proteins with particular focus on literature identifying brain or Alzheimer's-relevant functions. Provocatively, these data suggest a new perspective on the breadth of action of NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B, extending their roles into the sphere of neurodegenerative maladies. Finally, we discuss how this assembled body of non-canonical functions for these genes increases appreciation of their roles in cancer.

Pathobiology and genetic basis of Alzheimer's risk

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia, afflicting over 35 million people worldwide [15, 16]. There are currently no effective treatment strategies for AD, and the disease typically leads to death within 3 to 9 years [15, 17, 18]. Significant structural and functional alterations associated with AD include severe loss of brain volume as well as altered neuronal network activities [17]. β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) plaques, dystrophic neuritis and neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau, are dominant histopathological features [15]. The pathophysiological processes are complex, and include mitochondrial dysfunction (Aβ is a mitochondrial poison [19]), oxidative stress, inflammation, disturbance in cell-cycle re-entry, abnormal cholesterol metabolism, and aberrant vascular changes, with 60-90% of patients with AD presenting with ischemic disease [15, 17, 20-22]. Figure 1 summarizes AD-associated processes relevant to this article.

Figure 1. Alzheimer's disease associated processes that involve NEDD9, PTK2B and CASS4.

Figure 1

The processes depicted in this figure are: oxidative stress response [115, 116, 118, 121]; inflammatory response (NEDD9 control via PGE2 was described for cancer cells, not neurons) [79, 165, 175]; cell cycle regulation [83, 100]; microtubular alterations [83, 182-184]; vascular alterations [149, 150, 153, 155-157]; and retinoic acid induced signaling and transcription [99, 101, 110, 111]. APP = amyloid precursor protein; Aα = amyloid alpha; R1-R4 = repeat sequences (make up microtubule-binding domain of Tau); RTK = receptor tyrosine kinase.

Two different subtypes of AD have been identified: early-onset AD (EOAD; <65 years of age) and late-onset AD (LOAD; >65 years old). EOAD accounts for >1-6% of all cases [23] and tends to follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern [24]. For EOAD, defects in three genes have been described as causative: mutations, predominantly missense, in amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PSEN1), or presenilin2 (PSEN2) (Table 1; [24-27]). Presenilin 1 and 2 are critical components of the catalytic site of the γ-secretase complex, a membrane-embedded aspartyl protease required for cleaving the APP C-terminus (Figure 2; [28, 29]).

Table 1. Alzheimer's Disease mutations and NEDD9, PTK2B and CASS4 SNPs.

Alzheimer's Disease Gene Association Genetic Mechanism Biochemical Phenotype References
PSEN1 EOAD (30-70%) Mostly missense mutations (approx. 140) Reduced γ-secretase proteolytic activity [28, 224]
PSEN2 EOAD (<5%) Mostly missense mutations (approx. 10) Reduced γ-secretase proteolytic activity [28, 224]
APP EOAD (10-15%) Mostly missense mutations (approx. 16) Increased amount or longer pieces post-cleaving [224, 225]
APOE LOAD ε4 variant Increased Aβ aggregation and decreased clearance [33-35]
PTK2B LOAD SNP: rs28834970 (Chr. 8) [14]
CASS4 LOAD SNP: rs7274581 (Chr. 20) [14]
NEDD9 LOAD SNP: rs760678 (Chr. 6) [9, 13]

Figure 2. NEDD9, PTK2B and CASS4 as regulators of molecular signaling proposed as relevant in Alzheimer's disease [1, 15, 17, 57, 59, 62, 63, 66, 78, 83, 90, 95-97, 178, 185, 187, 191, 196-198, 200, 226, 227].

Figure 2

atRA = all-trans retinoic acid; RAR = retinoic acid receptor; RXR = retinoic X receptors.

The genetic complexity of LOAD is much greater than the relatively well understood genotypes of EOAD. Only apolipoprotein E (APOE) has consistently been identified as an AD susceptibility gene for LOAD, possibly due to the role APOE plays in the clearance of Aβ [16, 30-35]. However, it has been estimated that less than 20% of the risk for the development of LOAD is associated with APOE [36-38]. There has hence been considerable interest in identifying additional contributing factors. Systems biology and large scale genomics studies have begun to provide insights into the underlying multifactorial pathophysiology of AD [14, 32, 39-44], supporting the eventual development of effective treatment strategies. NEDD9, CASS4 and PTK2B have previously been much studied in the context of cancer [1-4]: as summarized below. Their recent identification as candidate regulators of the susceptibility of LOAD suggests numerous specific mechanisms by which they may influence LOAD disease onset and severity (Figure 1).

Genetic evidence linking NEDD9, CASS4, PTK2B and associated SNPs to neurodegenerative disease

To identify genetic determinants of LOAD, Lambert et al. performed a two-stage meta-analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. The study analyzed data from 74,046 individuals of diverse ethnicities, and identified a total of 19 AD susceptibility loci, 8 of which had previously been identified. Newly identified loci included SNPs in CASS4 (rs7274581 - chr20: 55018260 T/C) and PTK2B (rs28834970 - chr8: 27195121 T/C) [14]. These had genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8) in terms of an association with LOAD [14, 32]. Both rs7274581 and rs28834970 are intronic and distant from splice junctions (2996 and 11923 bases respectively) (allele T|C; http://cadd.gs.washington.edu/score; [45]).

Unlike CASS4 and PTK2B, NEDD9 was not identified as an LOAD associated susceptibility loci by Lambert et al.; in spite of NEDD9 having been implicated as such by several previous studies. The NEDD9 rs760678 SNP was first identified by Li et al. (2008) in a patient population of Caucasian descent, and was proposed to be a common genetic factor in LOAD and Parkinson's disease [10]. In this large-scale association study testing 4692 SNPs, the NEDD9 rs760678 SNP (allele C|G) was identified as the second most significant susceptibility marker (P = 0.0051); only rs439401, near APOE on chromosome 19, had a lower p value (P = 2.40x10-11; [10]). rs760678 (chr6: 11334654) C/G is located within intron 2, 28266 bases away from a splice site, and has a global minor allele frequency of 0.2984 (http://www.snpedia.com). A potential role for the NEDD9 rs760678 SNP was reiterated by an independent study of genomic DNA from 214 LOAD patients, 135 EOAD patients and 386 healthy individuals. This study found a positive association between rs760678 and LOAD (CC genotype: P = 0.016; C allele: P = 0.007). No significant difference between EOAD patients and the control group was detected (p > 0.1; [12]). Similar observations were made in an additional study with an independent cohort of Han Chinese patients, which compared 383 patients with LOAD with 369 non-affected individuals. A significant difference for both genotype (P = 0.003) and allele frequency (P = 0.002), between the LOAD group and the control group were determined. Additionally, a significant difference (genotype: P = 0.047; allele frequency: P = 0.024) between the two groups was maintained even if only subjects without the APOE ε4 allele were considered [13]. However, as mentioned, Lambert et al. did not report a significant occurrence of this particular SNP in their study [14] and Chapuis et al. have described the association between NEDD9 and AD as weak at best [46]. The differences between reports may reflect variation in subject selection, disregard of environmental factors, difference in analysis, or it may simply be due to the underlying complexity of AD. Of note, Chapuis et al. did not indicate in their study if the analyzed cases were cases of LOAD, EOAD or both, perhaps explaining the discordant findings [46]. In 2012, a meta-analysis by Wang et al. concluded that more studies with larger number of samples are required for more precise answers [9-13, 47].

The known biology of NEDD9 closely links its function to CASS4 and PTK2B, as summarized below, additionally suggesting NEDD9 as a compelling target for further studies focused on AD. rs760678 maps near a putative GATA1 transcription factor binding site [10], implying a possible role for the SNP in influencing NEDD9 expression. Intriguingly, the two scaffolding proteins and PTK2B have also been associated with the function of the protein TREM2. TREM2 has been strongly linked to AD and general dementia by several studies [40, 48-50], including the study by Lambert et al., which identified an AD susceptibility SNP (rs9381040; P = 6.3 × 10−7) only 24 kb away from the 5′ end of TREM2 [14]. Mutations in TREM2 significantly downregulate NEDD9 expression [48] and an established signaling relationship exists between TREM2, its signaling partner DAP12, and PTK2B. TREM2 is a membrane bound protein that is activated by as of yet unidentified ligands to trigger SFK dependent phosphorylation of DAP12, leading to SYK activation, which then engages in a reciprocal activation interplay with PTK2B [51-56]. As we continue to discuss the functionality of NEDD9, CASS4, or PTK2B in relation to LOAD, we view it as most likely that the identified SNPs influence the expression levels of these proteins and thus their functional roles.

Canonical biology of NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B: interactions between these proteins and evidence for action in the brain

Suggestively, NEDD9 and CASS4 are paralogues, with NEDD9 known to interact directly with PTK2B, and CASS4 retaining the motifs required for this interaction. Hence, association of all three with LOAD suggests a common function in the pathobiology of this disease (Figure 2; [1]), paralleling the interactions among these proteins that underlie development and progression of cancer [1-4, 57, 58].

In thinking about this common function, NEDD9 and CASS4 are expressed in many tissues, including the brain [59-61]. NEDD9 and CASS4 are members of the Crk-associated substrate (CAS) family of scaffolding proteins, which also includes BCAR1/p130Cas and embryonal Fyn substrate (EFS; also known as CAS3, CASS3, HEFS and SIN; [1, 2]). CAS proteins share several conserved sequence motifs, including an amino-terminal Src homology 3 (SH3) domain that allows binding with a number of proteins [2], including focal adhesion kinase (FAK) [62] and the FAK paralog PTK2B (Figure 2; [63, 64]). Additionally, CAS proteins contain a “substrate domain”, with multiple tyrosines that form SH2-binding motifs when phosphorylated [1, 4], a 4-helix bundle that provides a docking site for 14-3-3 proteins [65] and GRB2 [66] as well as a C-terminal helical domain that provides another site for interaction with additional proteins, such as SRC family kinases (SFKs), the CAS protein BCAR1 [1], and other signaling adaptors for integrin and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, such as NSP2/BCAR3/AND-34, SOS and C3G [66-69].

NEDD9 and CASS4 are regulated by and mediate cellular attachment to the extracellular matrix [59, 70, 71]. In studies predominantly performed in cancer cell lines of epithelial and lymphoid origin, following integrin engagement or mechanical stretching, FAK or PTK2B (discussed further below) directly bind and phosphorylate CAS proteins [62], which subsequently leads to further phosphorylation of the CAS proteins by SRC [63, 72-74]. Crk, Crk-L, and BCR/ABL associate with hyperphosphorylated CAS proteins to induce cell spreading (Figure 2; [4, 75]). Reciprocally, overexpression of NEDD9 or CASS4 activates FAK and SRC kinases [3, 59, 76] and organizes complexes that regulate the actin cytoskeleton, contributing to changes in cell adhesion, migration, and invasion, and involve regulation of RAC, DOCK3, and WAVE2 [77]. These changes may vary dependent on cell context, with most studies showing NEDD9 as a positive regulator [70, 78, 79], but some showing a negative role [71, 80, 81].

In addition, in some cell types, NEDD9 can induce the formation of neurite-like cell extensions that depend on an intact microtubule cytoskeleton [82]. Further, NEDD9 associates with and influences the activity of the kinase AURKA to govern appropriate organization of microtubules into a mitotic spindle [83]. Further interactions between NEDD9 and AURKA in G0/G1 cells regulate integrity of the cell cilium [84], a structure important for brain patterning and function [85, 86] that is organized around a microtubule-based axoneme. NEDD9 also associates with the TGFβ effectors and regulatory proteins SMAD3, SMAD6 and SMAD7 [57, 87-89], positioning it to influence cell differentiation status. To date, very few studies have addressed CASS4 function, although roles in control of cell migration have been established: given the high level of domain and sequence conservation between CASS4 and NEDD9 [59], some of the additional roles described above are likely to be relevant.

Protein tyrosine kinase 2 beta (PTK2B) is highly conserved with FAK (90% sequence identity) and together with FAK comprises the complete focal adhesion protein tyrosine kinase family [90]. Intriguingly, PTK2B is expressed with great tissue selectivity, with preferential expression in the central nervous system [91]. PTK2B has a central kinase region flanked by a FERM (band Four point one (4.1), Ezrin, Radixin, Moesin) N-terminal region and a focal adhesion-targeting (FAT) domain at the C-terminal, which allows binding to paxillin [91-93]. Poly-proline sequences on FAK and PTK2B mediate their interaction with the NEDD9 or CASS4 SH3 domain. Auto-phosphorylation of PTK2B induced in response to integrin ligation triggers recruitment of several proteins, most prominently SFKs and GRB2, to initiate migration-inducing signaling [94-96]. In some studies, FAK was shown to oppose the role of PTK2B in inducing reorganization of actin association with focal adhesions and cell rounding, suggesting balanced function of these proteins may be important for tissue organization [97].

Importantly, NEDD9 and PTK2B are highly active in neurologically relevant settings. NEDD9 is expressed in the developing brain [61, 98], and regulates neural crest cell migration [99]. NEDD9 is also required for TGFβ-initiated cell cycle exit and neuronal differentiation in forebrain-derived embryonic progenitor cells [100]. NEDD9 is upregulated in response to retinoic acid in human neuroblastoma cells [101], regulates morphology in glioma and neuroblastoma [80], and has elevated expression and promotes survival and invasion in glioblastomas [78]. Gene expression profiling of the murine striatum after administration of different classes of psychotropics indicated that a cluster of cell cycle regulators, including NEDD9, were significantly enriched [102]; one study has also shown that NEDD9 is upregulated in response to fluoxetine (Prozac), a psychotropic given to some patients with AD [103]. For PTK2B, expression levels are sharply elevated in the front brain shortly after birth [90, 104]. PTK2B localizes to neurites in rat pheochromocytoma cells upon stimulation with nerve growth factor [105], and is a key component of signaling pathways involved in neurite growth and synapse formation [106]. PTK2B and FAK association with adhesion complexes containing both integrins and receptor tyrosine kinases, such as EGFR, to mediate neurite induction by adhesion and growth factors [107]. Further relevant signaling aspects are based on PTK2B-SRC interactions, which couple signals from G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) to MAPK activation [96]. Like NEDD9, PTK2B induces the migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells; a role that distinguishes it from its paralog FAK [108].

Lastly, a recent study using a transgenic AD mouse model found that the retinoid X receptor (RXR) agonist bexarotene, used for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma [109], enhanced clearance of Aβ and improved cognitive function. Multiple studies have described a significant relationship between retinoic acid and NEDD9. The NEDD9 promoter contains binding elements for the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and RXR (Figure 1; [110]), and NEDD9 is induced by retinoic acid in neural crest cells and neuroblastoma cells [99, 101]. Furthermore, studies of PTK2B in leukemia cells have found it to be upregulated in response to treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid (atRA) [111]. PTK2B signaling, once induced with atRA, was sustained for extended time periods, suggesting a positive feedback loop. Hypothetically, RXR agonists may also increase PTK2B signaling in AD mouse models, and inhibition of PTK2B limit the bexarotene-dependent reduction of Aβ.

PTK2B and NEDD9 in oxygen responses

In addition to cell-intrinsic defects associated with control of neurite growth and movement, PTK2B, NEDD9, and CASS4 may also influence environmental factors associated with AD. The brain is immensely metabolically active and accounts for roughly 20% of overall oxygen consumption [112]. Even temporary hypoxia can cause permanent damage to neurons [113]. Hypoxia, including particularly chronic hypoxia, has been strongly implicated as causative in neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [114].

While the topic has not yet been significantly addressed for CASS4, Sasaki et al. demonstrated that NEDD9 is highly induced by transient ischemia, and localizes to dendrites and the cytosol of neurons. In this context, NEDD9 helps initiate neural projection formation and may be important for neurite regrowth and tissue recovery following ischemic damage [115]. A study of NEDD9 in colon cancer cells has confirmed that its induction under hypoxic conditions is regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) and in turn modulates the interaction between HIF1α and its transcriptional coactivator p300 (Figure 1; [116]). While multiple studies find that NEDD9 is upregulated during hypoxia [115-118], one study profiling transcriptomic changes induced by differing states of oxygen tension indicated that a specific set of mRNAs, including NEDD9, is downregulated during hypoxia [119]. The reported discordance may be due to differences in experimental models used (changes in oxygen levels in vitro versus induced ischemia in vivo) and discrepancies in defining hypoxia (Chadwick et al. state that neurons in culture are typically kept at oxygen levels that are too high to be considered endogenous due to high oxygen consumption in the brain [119]). This topic clearly requires more investigation for definitive conclusions to be made.

Under normoxic conditions, PTK2B is expressed, but typically inactive. However, as shown in a study of rat brains, PTK2B is upregulated and increasingly phosphorylated (i.e., activated) in response to induced hypoxia in microglia [120]. Another study using a mouse hind-limb ischemia model showed that hypoxia acts as a stress signal that is detected by PTK2B, which phosphorylates and activates endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS). eNOS in turn produces nitric oxide (NO), which promotes vasodilatation. During this response, PTK2B also stabilizes AKT kinase activity and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, which promotes VEGF activity [121, 122]. VEGF helps activate eNOS by triggering the phosphorylation of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, which leads to PTK2B dependent Ser1176 phosphorylation of eNOS, inducing angiogenesis, migration, and cytoskeletal reorganization [121, 123].

PTK2B and NEDD9 in the vascular system

Cerebrovascular pathologies are present in 60-90% of patients with AD [124]. Recent studies have linked the function of both PTK2B and NEDD9 to vascular integrity, angiogenesis, and hypertension. Hypertension is of particular interest, for one, because of its general prevalence, and two, because it can be managed pharmacologically and with lifestyle adjustments [125, 126]. Conflicting reports have been published regarding a correlation between hypertension and AD [127-131]; however, postmortem brain analyzes showed significantly less neuritic plaque and neurofibrillary tangle densities in individuals who had received hypertensive medication [132]. To corroborate these findings, in a large study of 2,248 participants, it was determined that use of anti-hypertensives (diuretics, angiotensin-1 receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) was associated with reduced risk of AD dementia [133].

PTK2B has been linked to key hypertensive events, such as increased cell growth in vascular smooth muscle cells, associated with angiotensin II induced PTK2B phosphorylation [134, 135], and significantly reduced expression of PTK2B in the hypothalamus of mice with established neurogenic hypertension compared to normotensive mice [136]. In a population-based case-control sample study of 2655 individuals, PTK2B variants were also indentified as associated with essential hypertension [137]; although, this observation was not confirmed in a GWAS, in which PTK2B variants were detected, but not seen as significantly associated with hypertension [138]. Strong evidence exists that suggests a direct signaling link between angiotensin, a critical player in the renin-angiotensin system required for blood pressure regulation, vasoconstriction and sodium/potassium regulation [139, 140], and PTK2B. The angiotensin II receptor type 1 transphosphorylates PTK2B to regulate c-Jun expression [141, 142]. Furthermore, PTK2B is critical for angiotensin II-initiated ERK activity [143]. Intriguingly, it has been shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme-1 (ACE1) is elevated in the brains of patients with AD, so are the PTK2B modulators angiotensin II and angiotensin II receptor type 1 [144-146]. Finally, one recent GWAS study has linked NEDD9 to primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), a disease that could be caused by endothelial defects or hypertension. In this case, a NEDD9 intronic SNP was highly associated with POAG (rs11961171, P = 8.55E−13; [147, 148]). Further study is indicated.

Vascular insufficiency and chronic cerebral hypo-perfusion are clearly involved to some degree in AD, although the cause and effect relationship has not been clearly defined [15, 124]. Aβ induces the potent angiogenic ligand VEGF [149], reportedly activating VEGF-receptors to increase angiogenesis and cell migration [150, 151]. VEGF is a major driver of angiogensis and it has been reported that angiogenesis increases vascular permeability and hypervascularity in AD [152]. NEDD9 and PTK2B have both been linked to angiogenesis and changes in their expression may contribute to hypo-perfusion and vascular permeability in AD. For example, NEDD9 has been defined as critical for a response to VEGF in cancer cells (Figure 1; [150]). When upregulated and activated, NEDD9, along with FAK, is a required target of VEGF signaling in invadopodia, leading to cell spreading and migration [150]. NEDD9 is also a downstream target of PTK2B, important for the regulation of endothelial cell cytoskeletal reorganization necessary for migration during angiogenesis (Figure 1; [3, 153]). Amyloid fibril exposure also increases PTK2B activation in cultured microglia [154]. If similar activation occurs in endothelial cells, PTK2B is positioned to increase endothelial permeability and regulate cell-cell adhesion through its previously described interaction with VE-cadherin (Figure 1; [155- 157]). Work on two transgenic AD mouse models has shown that the VEGFR inhibitor sunitinib re-establishes proper expression levels of proteins involved in vascular integrity, such as Aβ, thrombin, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and matrix metalloproteinase 9; NEDD9 and PTK2B were unfortunately not evaluated in this study [158].

PTK2B and NEDD9 in inflammation

Neuroinflammation has been suggested to play an important role in progression of Alzheimer's disease [33, 159] and epidemiological studies have suggested anti-inflammatory agents may have beneficial effects in AD [160]. Thus far, long term randomized studies have not convincingly shown that anti-inflammatory therapeutics benefit patients with AD; however, the Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT), a randomized study of 2528 elderly persons, led to the conclusion that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have an adverse effect in late stage AD, but reduced the incidence of AD after 2-3 years [161]. ADAPT emphasizes that better understanding of the pathophysiology of AD and the involved inflammatory processes is critical if the inflammatory process is to be effectively targeted with therapeutic intent.

Neuroinflammation involves the activation of microglia, astrocytes, marcrophages and lymphocytes, production of inflammatory cytokines, release of neurotransmitters and production of reactive oxygen species [159]. NEDD9 is important both for lymphocyte signaling [73, 162-164] and lymphocyte migration [79]. NEDD9 has also been implicated in T cell-mediated inflammation, predominantly on the basis of an association with ABL [164-166], with phosphorylation of NEDD9 by ABL and subsequent activation of RAP1 (Figure 1; [165]). PTK2B is required for neutrophil degranulation [167] and inhibition of PTK2B blocks inflammation in murine models of acute lung injury [168] and asthma [169]. PTK2B has also been implicated in the activation of T cells [170, 171] and T cell spreading [172, 173]. In light of the effects of NSAIDs on early stage AD, as reported by the ADAPT study, and the implication of NEDD9 and PTK2B not only in the inflammatory process, but also in AD, additional biological observations regarding NEDD9 are particularly relevant. NSAIDs such as ibuprofen, asprin, naproxen and rofecoxib suppress inflammation by inhibiting cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) activity [161]. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a downstream product of COX2 and is therefore suppressed by NSAID treatment [174]. In a first study in colorectal cancer, PGE2 was shown to dramatically upregulate NEDD9 expression [175], raising the possibility that a COX2-PGE2-NEDD9 axis is also involved in AD.

NEDD9 in microtubule network stabilization

Tau is one of the hallmark proteins of Alzheimer's disease [15], and involved in the pathological formation of tau neurofibrillary tangles [17, 176]. However, tau normally is involved in the assembly and stabilization of microtubules within neurons (Figure 2; [177]), a critical component of proper neuronal functionality [178] and a process disrupted in AD [179-181]. NEDD9 regulation of AURKA activity was first shown to regulate the appropriate organization of microtubules in mitosis [83]. In a particularly exciting finding, AURKA was found to be active in post-mitotic neurons, and to play a significant role in microtubule remodeling during neurite extension. This involves interactions between AURKA, atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), and NDEL1, a partner of the LIS1 gene (mutated in lissencephaly) that regulates dynein. AURKA phosphorylation of NDEL1 was essential to sustain a robust frequency of microtubules from the centrosome, anchoring neurite projection [182-184]. To date, although PTK2B and NEDD9 are abundant in neurites, a PTK2B-NEDD9-AURKA-NDEL1 axis has not been considered in neurite extension or neurodegenerative diseases. Providing additional linkages, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) phosphorylates tau contained in neurofibrillary tangles, and influences the formation of Aβ [185-188]. The NEDD9-regulated kinase AURKA has been shown in cancer cells to phosphorylate GSK-3β, increasing its activity [189]. In some cell types, the E3 ligase SMURF2 negatively regulates GSK-3β [190], but stabilizes NEDD9, promoting AURKA activity [191], raising the possibility of a feedback loop.

Some “canonical” activities of NEDD9 and PTK2B may also influence the formation of tau neurofibrillary tangles as well as APP-associated plaque formation (Figure 2). The SFK FYN binds NEDD9 (and potentially CASS4) [1, 192, 193], and directly regulates the function of PTK2B [194]. Conversely, studies of some CAS family members have shown that CAS-SFK binding is important for activating the SFK [195]. Importantly, FYN is responsible for increased phosphorylation of tau [196-198], a process that induces the dissociation of tau from microtubules, eventually leading to tangles composed of hyper-phosphorylated tau (Figure 2; [15, 199]). In another linkage, some in vitro studies have suggested that the activity of Aβ as a neurotoxin requires the induction of α2β1 and αVβ1 integrins, which in turn anomalously activate SFKs and PTK2B, and increase NEDD9 and CASS4 phosphorylation [154, 200].

NEDD9 and PTK2B in calcium signaling

Defects in calcium signaling have been suggested to play a significant role in the development of AD, and some evidence suggests that Aβ is responsible for disruption of calcium homeostasis [201, 202]. Aβ affects calcium permeability and signaling in brain tissue [203, 204] as well as calcium channel activity [205]. PTK2B is dependent on calcium for activation [105] and modulates NMDA receptor function and MAPK signaling (Figure 2; [104, 206]). NEDD9 activity also regulates and is regulated by calcium signaling. It has been shown in multiple studies that the calcium-regulating hormone calcitonin induces association and phosphorylation of NEDD9, paxillin, FAK, and PTK2B, promoting changes in cellular shape and motility patterns [207-209]. Although this signaling has been predominantly studied in kidney cells and osteoclasts, it is likely relevant in other tissues. In a second connection to calcium signaling control, NEDD9 activation of AURKA supports phosphorylation of the widely expressed polycystin 2 (PC2) calcium channel, to limit the channel's activity and decreases cytoplasmic calcium. Reciprocally, calcium induction of calmodulin (CaM) binding to AURKA supports the AURKA and NEDD9 interaction [210-212]. Relevant connections between calcium homeostasis and NEDD9 and PTK2B are hence clearly established and it would likely be of immense value to investigate the functional impact of this interplay in the context of AD.

Conclusions, and return to cancer biology

Alzheimer's disease, and particularly LOAD, is immensely complex, and our understanding of this disease on a molecular level is still limited. While genetic analyses to date imply heterogeneous origins for LOAD, the fact that three genes with close functional relatedness have separately been identified as contributing to this disease is highly suggestive of an important conserved pathway. For historical reasons, the bulk of molecular characterizations of NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B have stressed their roles in cancer. However, the data summarized above provide a roadmap for systematic investigation of these proteins in the regulation of hypertension, angiogenesis, hypoxia, calcium signaling, inflammatory response, and microtubule dynamics: all phenotypes highly relevant to LOAD. Given the most likely function of the SNPs is to activate or depress signaling of the NEDD9-CASS4-PTK2B axis, their action in LOAD may involve simultaneous subtle regulation of all these phenotypes, with cumulative effects in aged individuals.

Finally, while the main focus of this review has been on the roles of NEDD9, CASS4, and PTK2B in LOAD, many of the LOAD-relevant processes can further highlight the significance of these proteins in cancer. In cancer, discussion of action of the NEDD9-CASS4-PTK2B scaffolding and signaling axis almost invariably focuses on the regulation of cell migration and invasion, following the upregulation of NEDD9 and activation of PTK2B in many tumors. Of note from a therapeutic standpoint, inhibitors of FAK are in clinical development [213-216] and these inhibitors are also active against PTK2B [214]. The data reviewed above suggest that use of these inhibitors may have significant side effects impinging on function of the vascular and immune systems. At this point, whether such effects would be beneficial or negative is difficult to predict; however, we suggest that accumulated data now indicate that specific analysis of this question is worthy of preclinical investigation.

These data also suggest additional ways of thinking about NEDD9, PTK2B, and CASS4 in tumor cells. For example, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is almost entirely dependent on loss of VHL and induced hypoxic signaling involving VEGFR [217-219]. FAK/PTK2B inhibitors may be expected to behave differently in this class of tumors than others with less dependence on this signaling pathway. We believe that in order to advance cancer therapy it is important to target signaling nodes, functions, and malignant cellular reprogramming in order to maximize prevention, treatment and diagnosis [220-223]. Understanding the roles of scaffolding proteins is important in this regard, as these proteins often interconnect signaling cascades and phenotypic revulators. The described collection of functional relationships for NEDD9, CASS4 and PTK2B in AD is a generalizable approach of thinking about genotypes, phenotypes and ultimately functionality to understand diseases ranging from Alzheimer's to cancer.

Acknowledgments

The authors were supported by U54 CA149147, R21CA181287, and P50 CA083638 from the NIH (to EAG), F30 CA180607 from the NIH (to TNB), and NIH core grant CA06927 (to Fox Chase Cancer Center). We acknowledge the support of the Fox Chase Cancer Center Genomics Facility.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tikhmyanova N, Little JL, Golemis EA. CAS proteins in normal and pathological cell growth control. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS. 2010;67(7):1025–1048. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0213-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cabodi S, Camacho-Leal MD, Di Stefano P, Defilippi P. Integrin signalling adaptors: not only figurants in the cancer story. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(12):858–870. doi: 10.1038/nrc2967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guerrero MS, Parsons JT, Bouton AH. Cas and NEDD9 Contribute to Tumor Progression through Dynamic Regulation of the Cytoskeleton. Genes & cancer. 2012;3(5-6):371–381. doi: 10.1177/1947601912458585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nikonova AS, Gaponova AV, Kudinov AE, Golemis EA. CAS proteins in health and disease: An update. IUBMB LIFE. 2014 doi: 10.1002/iub.1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.O'Neill GM, Seo S, Serebriiskii IG, Lessin SR, Golemis EA. A new central scaffold for metastasis: parsing HEF1/Cas-L/NEDD9. Cancer Res. 2007;67(19):8975–8979. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang JX, Gao F, Zhao GQ, Zhang GJ. Role of NEDD9 in invasion and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. Experimental and therapeutic medicine. 2012;4(5):795–800. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kondo S, Iwata S, Yamada T, Inoue Y, Ichihara H, Kichikawa Y, Katayose T, Souta-Kuribara A, Yamazaki H, Hosono O, Kawasaki H, Tanaka H, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto M, Kamiya K, Dang NH, et al. Impact of the integrin signaling adaptor protein NEDD9 on prognosis and metastatic behavior of human lung cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012;18(22):6326–6338. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miao Y, Li AL, Wang L, Fan CF, Zhang XP, Xu HT, Yang LH, Liu Y, Wang EH. Overexpression of NEDD9 is Associated with Altered Expression of E-Cadherin, beta-Catenin and N-Cadherin and Predictive of Poor Prognosis in non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19(2):281–286. doi: 10.1007/s12253-012-9580-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fu Y, He F, Tang NL, Tam CW, Lui VW, Chiu HF, Lam LC. NEDD9 gene polymorphism influences the risk of Alzheimer disease and cognitive function in Chinese older persons. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2012;26(1):88–90. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182135ef3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Y, Grupe A, Rowland C, Holmans P, Segurado R, Abraham R, Jones L, Catanese J, Ross D, Mayo K, Martinez M, Hollingworth P, Goate A, Cairns NJ, Racette BA, Perlmutter JS, et al. Evidence that common variation in NEDD9 is associated with susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(5):759–767. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Y, Bi L, Wang H, Li Y, Di Q, Xu W, Qian Y. NEDD9 rs760678 polymorphism and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Lett. 2012;527(2):121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tedde A, Bagnoli S, Piaceri I, Lucenteforte E, Bessi V, Bracco L, Mugelli A, Sorbi S, Nacmias B. Different implication of NEDD9 genetic variant in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2010;477(3):121–123. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xing YY, Yu JT, Yan WJ, Chen W, Zhong XL, Jiang H, Wang P, Tan L. NEDD9 is genetically associated with Alzheimer's disease in a Han Chinese population. Brain Res. 2011;1369:230–234. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lambert J-C, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, Jun G, DeStefano AL, Bis JC, Beecham GW, Grenier-Boley B, Russo G, Thornton-Wells TA, Jones N, Smith AV, Chouraki V, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45(12):1452–1458. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM. Alzheimer's disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;362(4):329–344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O'Brien RJ, Wong PC. Amyloid precursor protein processing and Alzheimer's disease. Annual review of neuroscience. 2011;34:185–204. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang Y, Mucke L. Alzheimer mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Cell. 2012;148(6):1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Doody RS, Thomas RG, Farlow M, Iwatsubo T, Vellas B, Joffe S, Kieburtz K, Raman R, Sun X, Aisen PS, Siemers E, Liu-Seifert H, Mohs R. Phase 3 trials of solanezumab for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;370(4):311–321. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Calkins MJ, Reddy PH. Amyloid beta impairs mitochondrial anterograde transport and degenerates synapses in Alzheimer's disease neurons. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(4):507–513. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jack CR, Jr., Holtzman DM. Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2013;80(6):1347–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iadecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron. 2013;80(4):844–866. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yankner BA. Mechanisms of neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 1996;16(5):921–932. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80115-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ridge PG, Ebbert MT, Kauwe JS. Genetics of Alzheimer's disease. BioMed research international. 2013;2013:254954. doi: 10.1155/2013/254954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bettens K, Sleegers K, Van Broeckhoven C. Current status on Alzheimer disease molecular genetics: from past, to present, to future. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(R1):R4–R11. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bertram L, Lill CM, Tanzi RE. The genetics of Alzheimer disease: back to the future. Neuron. 2010;68(2):270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sherrington R, Rogaev EI, Liang Y, Rogaeva EA, Levesque G, Ikeda M, Chi H, Lin C, Li G, Holman K, Tsuda T, Mar L, Foncin JF, Bruni AC, Montesi MP, Sorbi S, et al. Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 1995;375(6534):754–760. doi: 10.1038/375754a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goate AM, Haynes AR, Owen MJ, Farrall M, James LA, Lai LY, Mullan MJ, Roques P, Rossor MN, Williamson R, et al. Predisposing locus for Alzheimer's disease on chromosome 2. Lancet. 1989;1(8634):352–355. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91725-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.De Strooper B, Iwatsubo T, Wolfe MS. Presenilins and gamma-secretase: structure, function, and role in Alzheimer Disease. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2012;2(1):a006304. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Okochi M, Tagami S, Yanagida K, Takami M, Kodama TS, Mori K, Nakayama T, Ihara Y, Takeda M. gamma-secretase modulators and presenilin 1 mutants act differently on presenilin/gamma-secretase function to cleave Abeta42 and Abeta4. Cell reports. 2013;3(1):42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Verghese PB, Castellano JM, Garai K, Wang Y, Jiang H, Shah A, Bu G, Frieden C, Holtzman DM. ApoE influences amyloid-beta (Abeta) clearance despite minimal apoE/Abeta association in physiological conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(19):E1807–1816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220484110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coon KD, Myers AJ, Craig DW, Webster JA, Pearson JV, Lince DH, Zismann VL, Beach TG, Leung D, Bryden L, Halperin RF, Marlowe L, Kaleem M, Walker DG, Ravid R, Heward CB, et al. A high-density whole-genome association study reveals that APOE is the major susceptibility gene for sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Psychiat. 2007;68(4):613–618. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kamboh MI, Demirci FY, Wang X, Minster RL, Carrasquillo MM, Pankratz VS, Younkin SG, Saykin AJ, Jun G, Baldwin C, Logue MW, Buros J, Farrer L, Pericak-Vance MA, Haines JL, Sweet RA, et al. Genome-wide association study of Alzheimer's disease. Translational psychiatry. 2012;2:e117. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu CC, Kanekiyo T, Xu H, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nature reviews Neurology. 2013;9(2):106–118. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. Science. 1993;261(5123):921–923. doi: 10.1126/science.8346443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein, E. high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(5):1977–1981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Slooter AJ, Cruts M, Kalmijn S, Hofman A, Breteler MM, Van Broeckhoven C, van Duijn CM. Risk estimates of dementia by apolipoprotein E genotypes from a population-based incidence study: the Rotterdam Study. Archives of neurology. 1998;55(7):964–968. doi: 10.1001/archneur.55.7.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Evans DA, Beckett LA, Field TS, Feng L, Albert MS, Bennett DA, Tycko B, Mayeux R. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 and incidence of Alzheimer disease in a community population of older persons. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 1997;277(10):822–824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Corneveaux JJ, Myers AJ, Allen AN, Pruzin JJ, Ramirez M, Engel A, Nalls MA, Chen K, Lee W, Chewning K, Villa SE, Meechoovet HB, Gerber JD, Frost D, Benson HL, O'Reilly S, et al. Association of CR1, CLU, and PICALM with Alzheimer's disease in a cohort of clinically characterized and neuropathologically verified individuals. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(16):3295–3301. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lambert JC, Heath S, Even G, Campion D, Sleegers K, Hiltunen M, Combarros O, Zelenika D, Bullido MJ, Tavernier B, Letenneur L, Bettens K, Berr C, Pasquier F, Fievet N, Barberger-Gateau P, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41(10):1094–U1068. doi: 10.1038/ng.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cruchaga C, Kauwe JS, Harari O, Jin SC, Cai Y, Karch CM, Benitez BA, Jeng AT, Skorupa T, Carrell D, Bertelsen S, Bailey M, McKean D, Shulman JM, De Jager PL, Chibnik L, et al. GWAS of cerebrospinal fluid tau levels identifies risk variants for Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2013;78(2):256–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hu XL, Pickering E, Liu YC, Hall S, Fournier H, Katz E, Dechairo B, John S, Van Eerdewegh P, Soares H. Meta-Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Multiple Variants at the BIN1 Locus Associated with Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boada M, Antunez C, Ramirez-Lorca R, DeStefano AL, Gonzalez-Perez A, Gayan J, Lopez-Arrieta J, Ikram MA, Hernandez I, Marin J, Galan JJ, Bis JC, Mauleon A, Rosende-Roca M, Moreno-Rey C, Gudnasson V, et al. ATP5H/KCTD2 locus is associated with Alzheimer's disease risk. Molecular psychiatry. 2014;19(6):682–687. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Saykin AJ, Shen L, Foroud TM, Potkin SG, Swaminathan S, Kim S, Risacher SL, Nho K, Huentelman MJ, Craig DW, Thompson PM, Stein JL, Moore JH, Farrer LA, Green RC, Bertram L, et al. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative biomarkers as quantitative phenotypes: Genetics core aims, progress, and plans. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(3):265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang B, Gaiteri C, Bodea LG, Wang Z, McElwee J, Podtelezhnikov AA, Zhang CS, Xie T, Tran L, Dobrin R, Fluder E, Clurman B, Melquist S, Narayanan M, Suver C, Shah H, et al. Integrated Systems Approach Identifies Genetic Nodes and Networks in Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2013;153(3):707–720. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O'Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):310–315. doi: 10.1038/ng.2892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chapuis J, Moisan F, Mellick G, Elbaz A, Silburn P, Pasquier F, Hannequin D, Lendon C, Campion D, Amouyel P, Lambert JC. Association study of the NEDD9 gene with the risk of developing Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(18):2863–2867. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Laumet G, Chouraki V, Grenier-Boley B, Legry V, Heath S, Zelenika D, Fievet N, Hannequin D, Delepine M, Pasquier F, Hanon O, Brice A, Epelbaum J, Berr C, Dartigues JF, Tzourio C, et al. Systematic analysis of candidate genes for Alzheimer's disease in a French, genome-wide association study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(4):1181–1188. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chouery E, Delague V, Bergougnoux A, Koussa S, Serre J, Megarbane A. Mutations in TREM2 Lead to Pure Early-Onset Dementia Without Bone Cysts. Human Mutation. 2008;29(9):E194–E204. doi: 10.1002/humu.20836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, Cruchaga C, Sassi C, Kauwe JS, Younkin S, Hazrati L, Collinge J, Pocock J, Lashley T, Williams J, Lambert JC, et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer's disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;368(2):117–127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Jonsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Snaedal J, Bjornsson S, Huttenlocher J, Levey AI, Lah JJ, Rujescu D, Hampel H, Giegling I, Andreassen OA, Engedal K, Ulstein I, et al. Variant of TREM2 Associated with the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease. New Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):107–116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Peng QS, Malhotra S, Torchia JA, Kerr WG, Coggeshall KM, Humphrey MB. TREM2-and DAP12-Dependent Activation of PIK Requires DAP10 and Is Inhibited by SHIP1. Sci Signal. 2010;3(122) doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang L, Gordon RA, Huynh L, Su XD, Min KHP, Han JH, Arthur JS, Kalliolias GD, Ivashkiv LB. Indirect Inhibition of Toll-like Receptor and Type I Interferon Responses by ITAM-Coupled Receptors and Integrins. Immunity. 2010;32(4):518–530. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ivashkiv LB. A signal-switch hypothesis for cross-regulation of cytokine and TLR signalling pathways. Nature reviews Immunology. 2008;8(10):816–822. doi: 10.1038/nri2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Medway C, Morgan K. Review: The genetics of Alzheimer's disease; putting flesh on the bones. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2014;40(2):97–105. doi: 10.1111/nan.12101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tassiulas I, Hu XY, Ho H, Kashyap Y, Paik P, Hu YM, Lowell CA, Ivashkiv LB. Amplification of IFN-alpha-induced STAT1 activation and inflammatory function by Syk and ITAM-containing adaptors. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(11):1181–1189. doi: 10.1038/ni1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang L, Tassiulas I, Park-Min KH, Reid AC, Gil-Henn H, Schlessinger J, Baron R, Zhang JJ, Ivashkiv LB. ‘Tuning’ of type I interferon-induced Jak-STAT1 signaling by calcium-dependent kinases in macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(2):186–193. doi: 10.1038/ni1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Singh M, Cowell L, Seo S, O'Neill G, Golemis E. Molecular basis for HEF1/NEDD9/Cas-L action as a multifunctional co-ordinator of invasion, apoptosis and cell cycle. Cell biochemistry and biophysics. 2007;48(1):54–72. doi: 10.1007/s12013-007-0036-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lipinski CA, Loftus JC. Targeting Pyk2 for therapeutic intervention. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2010;14(1):95–108. doi: 10.1517/14728220903473194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Singh MK, Dadke D, Nicolas E, Serebriiskii IG, Apostolou S, Canutescu A, Egleston BL, Golemis EA. A novel Cas family member, HEPL, regulates FAK and cell spreading. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(4):1627–1636. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Konopka G, Friedrich T, Davis-Turak J, Winden K, Oldham MC, Gao F, Chen L, Wang GZ, Luo R, Preuss TM, Geschwind DH. Human-specific transcriptional networks in the brain. Neuron. 2012;75(4):601–617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kumar S, Tomooka Y, Noda M. Identification of a set of genes with developmentally down-regulated expression in the mouse brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;185(3):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91747-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Law SF, Estojak J, Wang B, Mysliwiec T, Kruh G, Golemis EA. Human enhancer of filamentation 1, a novel p130cas-like docking protein, associates with focal adhesion kinase and induces pseudohyphal growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(7):3327–3337. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Astier A, Manie SN, Avraham H, Hirai H, Law SF, Zhang Y, Golemis EA, Fu Y, Druker BJ, Haghayeghi N, Freedman AS, Avraham S. The related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase differentially phosphorylates p130Cas and the Cas-like protein, p105HEF1. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(32):19719–19724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Keogh RJ, Houliston RA, Wheeler-Jones CPD. Human endothelial Pyk2 is expressed in two isoforms and associates with paxillin and p130Cas. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290(5):1470–1477. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Briknarova K, Nasertorabi F, Havert ML, Eggleston E, Hoyt DW, Li CL, Olson AJ, Vuori K, Ely KR. The serine-rich domain from Crk-associated substrate (p130(cas)) is a four-helix bundle. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(23):21908–21914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501258200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vuori K, Hirai H, Aizawa S, Ruoslahti E. Induction of p130(cas) signaling complex formation upon integrin-mediated cell adhesion: A role for Src family kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(6):2606–2613. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Garron ML, Arsenieva D, Zhong J, Bloom AB, Lerner A, O'Neill GM, Arold ST. Structural Insights into the Association between BCAR3 and Cas Family Members, an Atypical Complex Implicated in Anti-Oestrogen Resistance. J Mol Biol. 2009;386(1):190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mace PD, Wallez Y, Dobaczewska MK, Lee JJ, Robinson H, Pasquale EB, Riedl SJ. NSP-Cas protein structures reveal a promiscuous interaction module in cell signaling. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2011;18(12):1381–1387. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cai DP, Felekkis KN, Near RI, O'Neill GM, van Seventer JM, Golemis EA, Lerner A. The GDP exchange factor AND-34 is expressed in B cells, associates with HEF1, and activates Cdc42. J Immunol. 2003;170(2):969–978. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.2.969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Law SF, O'Neill GM, Fashena SJ, Einarson MB, Golemis EA. The docking protein HEF1 is an apoptotic mediator at focal adhesion sites. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(14):5184–5195. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.14.5184-5195.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhong J, Baquiran JB, Bonakdar N, Lees J, Ching YW, Pugacheva E, Fabry B, O'Neill GM. NEDD9 stabilizes focal adhesions, increases binding to the extra-cellular matrix and differentially effects 2D versus 3D cell migration. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tachibana K, Urano T, Fujita H, Ohashi Y, Kamiguchi K, Iwata S, Hirai H, Morimoto C. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Crk-associated substrates by focal adhesion kinase - A putative mechanism for the integrin-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of Crk-associated substrates. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272(46):29083–29090. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.46.29083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Manie SN, Beck AR, Astier A, Law SF, Canty T, Hirai H, Druker BJ, Avraham H, Haghayeghi N, Sattler M, Salgia R, Griffin JD, Golemis EA, Freedman AS. Involvement of p130(Cas) and p105(HEF1), a novel Cas-like docking protein, in a cytoskeleton-dependent signaling pathway initiated by ligation of integrin or antigen receptor on human B cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(7):4230–4236. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.7.4230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sawada Y, Tamada M, Dubin-Thaler BJ, Cherniavskaya O, Sakai R, Tanaka S, Sheetz MP. Force sensing by mechanical extension of the Src family kinase substrate p130Cas. Cell. 2006;127(5):1015–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.de Jong R, van Wijk A, Haataja L, Heisterkamp N, Groffen J. BCR/ABL-induced leukemogenesis causes phosphorylation of Hef1 and its association with Crkl. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(51):32649–32655. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ahn J, Sanz-Moreno V, Marshall CJ. The metastasis gene NEDD9 product acts through integrin beta 3 and Src to promote mesenchymal motility and inhibit amoeboid motility. Journal of cell science. 2012;125(7):1814–1826. doi: 10.1242/jcs.101444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sanz-Moreno V, Gadea G, Ahn J, Paterson H, Marra P, Pinner S, Sahai E, Marshall CJ. Rac activation and inactivation control plasticity of tumor cell movement. Cell. 2008;135(3):510–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Natarajan M, Stewart JE, Golemis EA, Pugacheva EN, Alexandropoulos K, Cox BD, Wang W, Grammer JR, Gladson CL. HEF1 is a necessary and specific downstream effector of FAK that promotes the migration of glioblastoma cells. Oncogene. 2006;25(12):1721–1732. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.van Seventer GA, Salmen HJ, Law SF, O'Neill GM, Mullen MM, Franz AM, Kanner SB, Golemis EA, van Seventer JM. Focal adhesion kinase regulates beta1 integrin-dependent T cell migration through an HEF1 effector pathway. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(5):1417–1427. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200105)31:5<1417::AID-IMMU1417>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhong J, Bach CT, Shum MS, O'Neill GM. NEDD9 regulates 3D migratory activity independent of the Rac1 morphology switch in glioma and neuroblastoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12(2):264–273. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Simpson KJ, Selfors LM, Bui J, Reynolds A, Leake D, Khvorova A, Brugge JS. Identification of genes that regulate epithelial cell migration using an siRNA screening approach. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(9):1027–1038. doi: 10.1038/ncb1762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bargon SD, Gunning PW, O'Neill GM. The Cas family docking protein, HEF1, promotes the formation of neurite-like membrane extensions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1746(2):143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pugacheva EN, Golemis EA. The focal adhesion scaffolding protein HEF1 regulates activation of the Aurora-A and Nek2 kinases at the centrosome. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(10):937–946. doi: 10.1038/ncb1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Pugacheva EN, Jablonski SA, Hartman TR, Henske EP, Golemis EA. HEF1-dependent Aurora A activation induces disassembly of the primary cilium. Cell. 2007;129(7):1351–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Guemez-Gamboa A, Coufal NG, Gleeson JG. Primary cilia in the developing and mature brain. Neuron. 2014;82(3):511–521. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Valente EM, Rosti RO, Gibbs E, Gleeson JG. Primary cilia in neurodevelopmental disorders. Nature reviews Neurology. 2014;10(1):27–36. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Nourry C, Maksumova L, Pang M, Liu XH, Wang TW. Direct interaction between Smad3, APC10, CDH1 and HEF1 in proteasomal degradation of HEF1. Bmc Cell Biol. 2004;5 doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-5-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Inamoto S, Iwata S, Inamoto T, Nomura S, Sasaki T, Urasaki Y, Hosono O, Kawasaki H, Tanaka H, Dang NH, Morimoto C. Crk-associated substrate lymphocyte type regulates transforming growth factor-beta signaling by inhibiting Smad6 and Smad7. Oncogene. 2007;26(6):893–904. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Liu X, Elia AE, Law SF, Golemis EA, Farley J, Wang T. A novel ability of Smad3 to regulate proteasomal degradation of a Cas family member HEF1. Embo J. 2000;19(24):6759–6769. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.24.6759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Avraham H, Park SY, Schinkmann K, Avraham S. RAFTK/Pyk2-mediated cellular signalling. Cell Signal. 2000;12(3):123–133. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(99)00076-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Xiong WC, Macklem M, Parsons JT. Expression and characterization of splice variants of PYK2, a focal adhesion kinase-related protein. Journal of cell science. 1998;111:1981–1991. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.14.1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sasaki H, Nagura K, Ishino M, Tobioka H, Kotani K, Sasaki T. Cloning and characterization of cell adhesion kinase beta, a novel protein-tyrosine kinase of the focal adhesion kinase subfamily. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(36):21206–21219. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.36.21206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2005;6(1):56–68. doi: 10.1038/nrm1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Block ER, Tolino MA, Klarlund JK. Pyk2 activation triggers epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and cell motility after wounding sheets of epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(18):13372–13379. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.083089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Blaukat A, Ivankovic-Dikic I, Gronroos E, Dolfi F, Tokiwa G, Vuori K, Dikic I. Adaptor proteins Grb2 and Crk couple Pyk2 with activation of specific mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(21):14893–14901. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.21.14893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dikic I, Tokiwa G, Lev S, Courtneidge SA, Schlessinger J. A role for Pyk2 and Src in linking G-protein-coupled receptors with MAP kinase activation. Nature. 1996;383(6600):547–550. doi: 10.1038/383547a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Du QS, Ren XR, Xie Y, Wang Q, Mei L, Xiong WC. Inhibition of PYK2-induced actin cytoskeleton reorganization, PYK2 autophosphorylation and focal adhesion targeting by FAK. Journal of cell science. 2001;114(Pt 16):2977–2987. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.16.2977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Aquino JB, Marmigere F, Lallemend F, Lundgren TK, Villar MJ, Wegner M, Ernfors P. Differential expression and dynamic changes of murine NEDD9 in progenitor cells of diverse tissues. Gene Expr Patterns. 2008;8(4):217–226. doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Aquino JB, Lallemend F, Marmigere F, Adameyko II, Golemis EA, Ernfors P. The retinoic acid inducible Cas-family signaling protein Nedd9 regulates neural crest cell migration by modulating adhesion and actin dynamics. Neuroscience. 2009;162(4):1106–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Vogel T, Ahrens S, Buttner N, Krieglstein K. Transforming growth factor beta promotes neuronal cell fate of mouse cortical and hippocampal progenitors in vitro and in vivo: identification of Nedd9 as an essential signaling component. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20(3):661–671. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Merrill RA, Ahrens JM, Kaiser ME, Federhart KS, Poon VY, Clagett-Dame M. All-trans retinoic acid-responsive genes identified in the human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line and their regulated expression in the nervous system of early embryos. Biol Chem. 2004;385(7):605–614. doi: 10.1515/BC.2004.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Piechota M, Korostynski M, Solecki W, Gieryk A, Slezak M, Bilecki W, Ziolkowska B, Kostrzewa E, Cymerman I, Swiech L, Jaworski J, Przewlocki R. The dissection of transcriptional modules regulated by various drugs of abuse in the mouse striatum. Genome Biol. 2010;11(5):R48. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lauterbach EC. Psychotropic drug effects on gene transcriptomics relevant to Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2012;26(1):1–7. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318214b7d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lev S, Moreno H, Martinez R, Canoll P, Peles E, Musacchio JM, Plowman GD, Rudy B, Schlessinger J. Protein tyrosine kinase PYK2 involved in Ca(2+)-induced regulation of ion channel and MAP kinase functions. Nature. 1995;376(6543):737–745. doi: 10.1038/376737a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Park SY, Avraham H, Avraham S. Characterization of the tyrosine kinases RAFTK/Pyk2 and FAK in nerve growth factor-induced neuronal differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(26):19768–19777. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909932199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wang X, Bao X, Pal R, Agbas A, Michaelis EK. Transcriptomic responses in mouse brain exposed to chronic excess of the neurotransmitter glutamate. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:360. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ivankovic-Dikic I, Gronroos E, Blaukat A, Barth BU, Dikic I. Pyk and FAK regulate neurite outgrowth induced by growth factors and integrins. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(9):574–581. doi: 10.1038/35023515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lipinski CA, Tran NL, Menashi E, Rohl C, Kloss J, Bay RC, Berens ME, Loftus JC. The tyrosine kinase pyk2 promotes migration and invasion of glioma cells. Neoplasia. 2005;7(5):435–445. doi: 10.1593/neo.04712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gniadecki R, Assaf C, Bagot M, Dummer R, Duvic M, Knobler R, Ranki A, Schwandt P, Whittaker S. The optimal use of bexarotene in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Brit J Dermatol. 2007;157(3):433–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07975.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Knutson DC, Clagett-Dame M. atRA Regulation of NEDD9, a gene involved in neurite outgrowth and cell adhesion. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;477(1):163–174. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ovcharenko A, Granot G, Shpilberg O, Raanani P. Retinoic acid induces adhesion and migration in NB4 cells through Pyk2 signaling. Leukemia Res. 2013;37(8):956–962. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Raichle ME, Gusnard DA. Appraising the brain's energy budget. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(16):10237–10239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172399499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Banasiak KJ, Xia Y, Haddad GG. Mechanisms underlying hypoxia-induced neuronal apoptosis. Progress in neurobiology. 2000;62(3):215–249. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Peers C, Dallas ML, Boycott HE, Scragg JL, Pearson HA, Boyle JP. Hypoxia and neurodegeneration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1177:169–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sasaki T, Iwata S, Okano HJ, Urasaki Y, Hamada J, Tanaka H, Dang NH, Okano H, Morimoto C. Nedd9 protein, a Cas-L homologue, is upregulated after transient global ischemia in rats: possible involvement of Nedd9 in the differentiation of neurons after ischemia. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2457–2462. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185672.10390.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kim SH, Xia D, Kim SW, Holla V, Menter DG, Dubois RN. Human enhancer of filamentation 1 Is a mediator of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-mediated migration in colorectal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70(10):4054–4063. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ismail HM. Overexpression of s6 kinase 1 in brain tumours is associated with induction of hypoxia-responsive genes and predicts patients' survival. Journal of oncology. 2012;2012:416927. doi: 10.1155/2012/416927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Xu J, Li H, Wang B, Xu Y, Yang J, Zhang X, Harten SK, Shukla D, Maxwell PH, Pei D, Esteban MA. VHL inactivation induces HEF1 and Aurora kinase A. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(12):2041–2046. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010040345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Chadwick W, Boyle JP, Zhou Y, Wang L, Park SS, Martin B, Wang R, Becker KG, Wood WH, 3rd, Zhang Y, Peers C, Maudsley S. Multiple oxygen tension environments reveal diverse patterns of transcriptional regulation in primary astrocytes. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Tian D, Litvak V, Lev S. Cerebral ischemia and seizures induce tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2 in neurons and microglial cells. J Neurosci. 2000;20(17):6478–6487. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-06478.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Matsui A, Okigaki M, Amano K, Adachi Y, Jin D, Takai S, Yamashita T, Kawashima S, Kurihara T, Miyazaki M, Tateishi K, Matsunaga S, Katsume A, Honshou S, Takahashi T, Matoba S, et al. Central role of calcium-dependent tyrosine kinase PYK2 in endothelial nitric oxide synthase-mediated angiogenic response and vascular function. Circulation. 2007;116(9):1041–1051. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.645416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kitamura T, Asai N, Enomoto A, Maeda K, Kato T, Ishida M, Jiang P, Watanabe T, Usukura J, Kondo T, Costantini F, Murohara T, Takahashi M. Regulation of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis by the Akt/PKB substrate Girdin. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(3):329–337. doi: 10.1038/ncb1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Feliers D, Chen X, Akis N, Choudhury GG, Madaio M, Kasinath BS. VEGF regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in glomerular endothelial cells. Kidney international. 2005;68(4):1648–1659. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kalaria RN, Akinyemi R, Ihara M. Does vascular pathology contribute to Alzheimer changes? J Neurol Sci. 2012;322(1-2):141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303(20):2043–2050. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Elmer PJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Simons-Morton D, Stevens VJ, Young DR, Lin PH, Champagne C, Harsha DW, Svetkey LP, Ard J, Brantley PJ, Proschan MA, Erlinger TP, Appel LJ. Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on diet, weight, physical fitness, and blood pressure control: 18-month results of a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2006;144(7):485–495. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Luchsinger JA, Reitz C, Honig LS, Tang MX, Shea S, Mayeux R. Aggregation of vascular risk factors and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2005;65(4):545–551. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172914.08967.dc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Peila R, White LR, Petrovich H, Masaki K, Ross GW, Havlik RJ, Launer LJ. Joint effect of the APOE gene and midlife systolic blood pressure on late-life cognitive impairment - The Honolulu-Asia aging study. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2882–2887. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.100392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Elias MF, Wolf PA, Dagostino RB, Cobb J, White LR. Untreated Blood-Pressure Level Is Inversely Related to Cognitive-Functioning - the Framingham-Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(6):353–364. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Morris MC, Scherr PA, Hebert LE, Glynn RJ, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Association of incident Alzheimer disease and blood pressure measured from 13 years before to 2 years after diagnosis in a large community study. Archives of neurology. 2001;58(10):1640–1646. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.10.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Lindsay J, Laurin D, Verreault R, Hebert R, Helliwell B, Hill GB, McDowell I. Risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: a prospective analysis from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(5):445–453. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Hoffman LB, Schmeidler J, Lesser GT, Beeri MS, Purohit DP, Grossman HT, Haroutunian V. Less Alzheimer disease neuropathology in medicated hypertensive than nonhypertensive persons. Neurology. 2009;72(20):1720–1726. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000345881.82856.d5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Yasar S, Xia J, Yao WL, Furberg CD, Xue QL, Mercado CI, Fitzpatrick AL, Fried LP, Kawas CH, Sink KM, Williamson JD, DeKosky ST, Carlson MC, Investigators GS. Antihypertensive drugs decrease risk of Alzheimer disease Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study. Neurology. 2013;81(10):896–903. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a35228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rocic P, Griffin TM, McRae CN, Lucchesi PA. Altered PYK2 phosphorylation by ANG II in hypertensive vascular smooth muscle. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2002;282(2):H457–465. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00546.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sabri A, Govindarajan G, Griffin TM, Byron KL, Samarel AM, Lucchesi PA. Calcium-and protein kinase C-dependent activation of the tyrosine kinase PYK2 by angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle. Circulation research. 1998;83(8):841–851. doi: 10.1161/01.res.83.8.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Marques FZ, Campain AE, Davern PJ, Yang YH, Head GA, Morris BJ. Global identification of the genes and pathways differentially expressed in hypothalamus in early and established neurogenic hypertension. Physiological genomics. 2011;43(12):766–771. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00009.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Kamide K, Kokubo Y, Fukuhara S, Hanada H, Yang J, Kada A, Nagura J, Takiuchi S, Horio T, Kawano Y, Okayama A, Tomoike H, Miyata T. Protein tyrosine kinase 2 beta as a candidate gene for hypertension. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2007;17(11):931–939. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282ef640e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Miyaki K, Htun NC, Song Y, Ikeda S, Muramatsu M, Shimbo T. The combined impact of 12 common variants on hypertension in Japanese men, considering GWAS results. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26(7):430–436. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2011.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Crowley SD, Gurley SB, Herrera MJ, Ruiz P, Griffiths R, Kumar AP, Kim HS, Smithies O, Le TH, Coffman TM. Angiotensin II causes hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy through its receptors in the kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(47):17985–17990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605545103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Pessoa BS, van der Lubbe N, Verdonk K, Roks AJM, Hoorn EJ, Danser AHJ. Key developments in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(1):26–36. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Matsubara H, Shibasaki Y, Okigaki M, Mori Y, Masaki H, Kosaki A, Tsutsumi Y, Uchiyama Y, Fujiyama S, Nose A, Iba O, Tateishi E, Hasegawa T, Horiuchi M, Nahmias C, Iwasaka T. Effect of angiotensin II type 2 receptor on tyrosine kinase Pyk2 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase via SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase activity: Evidence from vascular-targeted transgenic mice of AT2 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;282(5):1085–1091. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Murasawa S, Matsubara H, Mori Y, Masaki H, Tsutsumi Y, Shibasaki Y, Kitabayashi I, Tanaka Y, Fujiyama S, Koyama Y, Fujiyama A, Iba S, Iwasaka T. Angiotensin II initiates tyrosine kinase Pyk2-dependent signalings leading to activation of Rac1-mediated c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(35):26856–26863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909999199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Murasawa S, Mori Y, Nozawa Y, Masaki H, Maruyama K, Tsutsumi Y, Moriguchi Y, Shibasaki Y, Tanaka Y, Iwasaka T, Inada M, Matsubara H. Role of calcium-sensitive tyrosine kinase Pyk2/CAK beta/RAFTK in angiotensin II-induced Ras/ERK signaling. Hypertension. 1998;32(4):668–675. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.32.4.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Benigni A, Cassis P, Remuzzi G. Angiotensin II revisited: new roles in inflammation, immunology and aging. Embo Mol Med. 2010;2(7):247–257. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201000080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Miners JS, Ashby E, Van Helmond Z, Chalmers KA, Palmer LE, Love S, Kehoe PG. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels and activity in Alzheimer's disease, and relationship of perivascular ACE-1 to cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neuropath Appl Neuro. 2008;34(2):181. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Savaskan E, Hock C, Olivieri G, Bruttel S, Rosenberg C, Hulette C, Muller-Spahn F. Cortical alterations of angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II and AT1 receptor in Alzheimer's dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22(4):541–546. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00259-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Su W-W, Cheng S-T, Ho W-J, Tsay P-K, Wu S-C, Chang SHL. Glaucoma Is Associated with Peripheral Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1173–1178. e1171. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Gibson J, Griffiths H, De Salvo G, Cole M, Jacob A, Macleod A, Yang Y, Menon G, Cree A, Ennis S, Lotery A. Genome-wide association study of primary open angle glaucoma risk and quantitative traits. Mol Vis. 2012;18:1083–1092. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Armato U, Chakravarthy B, Pacchiana R, Whitfield JF. Alzheimer's disease: an update of the roles of receptors, astrocytes and primary cilia (review) International journal of molecular medicine. 2013;31(1):3–10. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Lucas JT, Jr., Salimath BP, Slomiany MG, Rosenzweig SA. Regulation of invasive behavior by vascular endothelial growth factor is HEF1-dependent. Oncogene. 2010;29(31):4449–4459. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Vincent L, Jin DK, Karajannis MA, Shido K, Hooper AT, Rashbaum WK, Pytowski B, Wu Y, Hicklin DJ, Zhu Z, Bohlen P, Niesvizky R, Rafii S. Fetal stromal-dependent paracrine and intracrine vascular endothelial growth factor-a/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 signaling promotes proliferation and motility of human primary myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3185–3192. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Biron KE, Dickstein DL, Gopaul R, Jefferies WA. Amyloid triggers extensive cerebral angiogenesis causing blood brain barrier permeability and hypervascularity in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Tang H, Hao Q, Fitzgerald T, Sasaki T, Landon EJ, Inagami T. Pyk2/CAKbeta tyrosine kinase activity-mediated angiogenesis of pulmonary vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(7):5441–5447. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110673200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Combs CK, Johnson DE, Cannady SB, Lehman TM, Lreth GE. Identification of microglial signal transduction pathways mediating a neurotoxic response to amyloidogenic fragments of beta-amyloid and prion proteins. J Neurosci. 1999;19(3):928–939. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-03-00928.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Cain RJ, Vanhaesebroeck B, Ridley AJ. The PI3K p110alpha isoform regulates endothelial adherens junctions via Pyk2 and Rac1. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(6):863–876. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Cain RJ, Vanhaesebroeck B, Ridley AJ. Different PI 3-kinase inhibitors have distinct effects on endothelial permeability and leukocyte transmigration. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44(11):1929–1936. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.van Buul JD, Anthony EC, Fernandez-Borja M, Burridge K, Hordijk PL. Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) mediates vascular endothelial-cadherin-based cell-cell adhesion by regulating beta-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(22):21129–21136. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500898200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Grammas P, Martinez J, Sanchez A, Yin X, Riley J, Gay D, Desobry K, Tripathy D, Luo J, Evola M, Young A. A new paradigm for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: targeting vascular activation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(3):619–630. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2014-132057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Lee YJ, Han SB, Nam SY, Oh KW, Hong JT. Inflammation and Alzheimer's disease. Archives of pharmacal research. 2010;33(10):1539–1556. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-1006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Imbimbo BP, Solfrizzi V, Panza F. Are NSAIDs useful to treat Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment? Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2010;2 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Breitner JC, Baker LD, Montine TJ, Meinert CL, Lyketsos CG, Ashe KH, Brandt J, Craft S, Evans DE, Green RC, Ismail MS, Martin BK, Mullan MJ, Sabbagh M, Tariot PN. Extended results of the Alzheimer's disease anti-inflammatory prevention trial. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(4):402–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Minegishi M, Tachibana K, Sato T, Iwata S, Nojima Y, Morimoto C. Structure and function of Cas-L, a 105-kD Crk-associated substrate-related protein that is involved in beta 1 integrin-mediated signaling in lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1996;184(4):1365–1375. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.4.1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ohashi Y, Tachibana K, Kamiguchi K, Fujita H, Morimoto C. T cell receptor-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas-L, a 105-kDa Crk-associated substrate-related protein, and its association of Crk and C3G. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(11):6446–6451. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Regelmann AG, Danzl NM, Wanjalla C, Alexropoulos K. The hematopoietic isoform of Cas-Hef1-associated signal transducer regulates chemokine-induced inside-out signaling and T cell trafficking. Immunity. 2006;25(6):907–918. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Gu JJ, Lavau CP, Pugacheva E, Soderblom EJ, Moseley MA, Pendergast AM. Abl family kinases modulate T cell-mediated inflammation and chemokine-induced migration through the adaptor HEF1 and the GTPase Rap1. Sci Signal. 2012;5(233):ra51. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Nolz JC, Nacusi LP, Segovis CM, Medeiros RB, Mitchell JS, Shimizu Y, Billadeau DD. The WAVE2 complex regulates T cell receptor signaling to integrins via Abl-and CrkL-C3G-mediated activation of Rap1. J Cell Biol. 2008;182(6):1231–1244. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200801121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Kamen LA, Schlessinger J, Lowell CA. Pyk2 Is Required for Neutrophil Degranulation and Host Defense Responses to Bacterial Infection. J Immunol. 2011;186(3):1656–1665. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Duan YL, Learoyd J, Meliton AY, Leff AR, Zhu XD. Inhibition of Pyk2 blocks lung inflammation and injury in a mouse model of acute lung injury. Resp Res. 2012;13 doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Duan Y, Learoyd J, Meliton AY, Clay BS, Leff AR, Zhu X. Inhibition of Pyk2 blocks airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;42(4):491–497. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0469OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Berg NN, Ostergaard HL. T cell receptor engagement induces tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2 and their association with Lck. J Immunol. 1997;159(4):1753–1757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Beinke S, Phee H, Clingan JM, Schlessinger J, Matloubian M, Weiss A. Proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 is critical for CD8 T-cell short-lived effector fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(37):16234–16239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011556107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Li RH, Wong N, Jabali MD, Johnson P. CD44-initiated cell spreading induces Pyk2 phosphorylation, is mediated by Src family kinases, and is negatively regulated by CD45. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(31):28767–28773. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100158200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Ostergaard HL, Lou O, Arendt CW, Berg NN. Paxillin phosphorylation and association with Lck and Pyk2 in anti-CD3-or anti-CD45-stimulated T cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273(10):5692–5696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Ulrich CM, Bigler J, Potter JD. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cancer prevention: promise, perils and pharmacogenetics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(2):130–140. doi: 10.1038/nrc1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Xia D, Holla VR, Wang D, Menter DG, DuBois RN. HEF1 is a crucial mediator of the proliferative effects of prostaglandin E on colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70(2):824–831. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Cohen TJ, Guo JL, Hurtado DE, Kwong LK, Mills IP, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. The acetylation of tau inhibits its function and promotes pathological tau aggregation. Nature communications. 2011;2:252. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Iqbal K, Alonso Adel C, Chen S, Chohan MO, El-Akkad E, Gong CX, Khatoon S, Li B, Liu F, Rahman A, Tanimukai H, Grundke-Iqbal I. Tau pathology in Alzheimer disease and other tauopathies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1739(2-3):198–210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Conde C, Caceres A. Microtubule assembly, organization and dynamics in axons and dendrites. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10(5):319–332. doi: 10.1038/nrn2631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Zhang B, Maiti A, Shively S, Lakhani F, McDonald-Jones G, Bruce J, Lee EB, Xie SX, Joyce S, Li C, Toleikis PM, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ. Microtubule-binding drugs offset tau sequestration by stabilizing microtubules and reversing fast axonal transport deficits in a tauopathy model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(1):227–231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406361102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Alonso AD, GrundkeIqbal I, Iqbal K. Alzheimer's disease hyperphosphorylated tau sequesters normal tau into tangles of filaments and disassembles microtubules. Nat Med. 1996;2(7):783–787. doi: 10.1038/nm0796-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Jean DC, Baas PW. It cuts two ways: microtubule loss during Alzheimer disease. Embo J. 2013;32(22):2900–2902. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Yamada M, Hirotsune S, Wynshaw-Boris A. The essential role of LIS1, NDEL1 and Aurora-A in polarity formation and microtubule organization during neurogensis. Cell Adh Migr. 2010;4(2):180–184. doi: 10.4161/cam.4.2.10715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Mori D, Yamada M, Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Shirai Y, Suzuki A, Ohno S, Saya H, Wynshaw-Boris A, Hirotsune S. An essential role of the aPKC-Aurora A-NDEL1 pathway in neurite elongation by modulation of microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(9):1057–1068. doi: 10.1038/ncb1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Mori D, Yano Y, Toyo-oka K, Yoshida N, Yamada M, Muramatsu M, Zhang D, Saya H, Toyoshima YY, Kinoshita K, Wynshaw-Boris A, Hirotsune S. NDEL1 phosphorylation by Aurora-A kinase is essential for centrosomal maturation, separation, and TACC3 recruitment. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(1):352–367. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00878-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Hooper C, Killick R, Lovestone S. The GSK3 hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of neurochemistry. 2008;104(6):1433–1439. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Inestrosa NC, Arenas E. Emerging roles of Wnts in the adult nervous system. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11(2):77–86. doi: 10.1038/nrn2755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Ly PT, Wu Y, Zou H, Wang R, Zhou W, Kinoshita A, Zhang M, Yang Y, Cai F, Woodgett J, Song W. Inhibition of GSK3beta-mediated BACE1 expression reduces Alzheimer-associated phenotypes. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(1):224–235. doi: 10.1172/JCI64516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Hanger DP, Anderton BH, Noble W. Tau phosphorylation: the therapeutic challenge for neurodegenerative disease. Trends in molecular medicine. 2009;15(3):112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Dar AA, Belkhiri A, El-Rifai W. The aurora kinase A regulates GSK-3beta in gastric cancer cells. Oncogene. 2009;28(6):866–875. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Wu Q, Huang JH, Sampson ER, Kim KO, Zuscik MJ, O'Keefe RJ, Chen D, Rosier RN. Smurf2 induces degradation of GSK-3beta and upregulates beta-catenin in chondrocytes: a potential mechanism for Smurf2-induced degeneration of articular cartilage. Experimental cell research. 2009;315(14):2386–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Moore FE, Osmundson EC, Koblinski J, Pugacheva E, Golemis EA, Ray D, Kiyokawa H. The WW-HECT protein Smurf2 interacts with the Docking Protein NEDD9/ HEF1 for Aurora A activation. Cell division. 2010;5:22. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-5-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Kanda H, Mimura T, Hamasaki K, Yamamoto K, Yazaki Y, Hirai H, Nojima Y. Fyn and Lck tyrosine kinases regulate tyrosine phosphorylation of p105CasL, a member of the p130Cas docking protein family, in T-cell receptor-mediated signalling. Immunology. 1999;97(1):56–61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00753.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Miyake-Nishijima R, Iwata S, Saijo S, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi S, Souta-Kuribara A, Hosono O, Kawasaki H, Tanaka H, Ikeda E, Okada Y, Iwakura Y, Morimoto C. Role of Crk-associated substrate lymphocyte type in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis in tax transgenic mice and in humans. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2003;48(7):1890–1900. doi: 10.1002/art.11047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Qian DP, Lev S, vanOers NSC, Dikic I, Schlessinger J, Weiss A. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2 is selectively regulated by Fyn during TCR signaling. J Exp Med. 1997;185(7):1253–1259. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.7.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Xing LZ, Ge C, Zeltser R, Maskevitch G, Mayer BJ, Alexropoulos K. c-Src signaling induced by the adapters Sin and Cas is mediated by Rap1 GTPas. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(19):7363–7377. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.19.7363-7377.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Bhaskar K, Yen SH, Lee G. Disease-related modifications in tau affect the interaction between Fyn and tau. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(42):35119–35125. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505895200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Lee G, Thangavel R, Sharma VM, Litersky JM, Bhaskar K, Fang SM, Do LH, Andreadis A, Van Hoesen G, Ksiezak-Reding H. Phosphorylation of tau by fyn: Implications for Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24(9):2304–2312. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4162-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Lee G, Newman ST, Gard DL, Band H, Panchamoorthy G. Tau interacts with src-family non-receptor tyrosine kinases. Journal of cell science. 1998;111:3167–3177. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.21.3167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Gotz J, Ittner LM. Animal models of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2008;9(7):532–544. doi: 10.1038/nrn2420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Wright S, Malinin NL, Powell KA, Yednock T, Rydel RE, Griswold-Prenner I. Alpha2beta1 and alphaVbeta1 integrin signaling pathways mediate amyloid-beta-induced neurotoxicity. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28(2):226–237. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Lim D, Ronco V, Grolla AA, Verkhratsky A, Genazzani AA. Glial Calcium Signalling in Alzheimer's Disease. Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. 2014 doi: 10.1007/112_2014_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Demuro A, Parker I, Stutzmann GE. Calcium signaling and amyloid toxicity in Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(17):12463–12468. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.080895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Grolla AA, Sim JA, Lim D, Rodriguez JJ, Genazzani AA, Verkhratsky A. Amyloid-beta and Alzheimer's disease type pathology differentially affects the calcium signalling toolkit in astrocytes from different brain regions. Cell death & disease. 2013;4:e623. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Demuro A, Mina E, Kayed R, Milton SC, Parker I, Glabe CG. Calcium dysregulation and membrane disruption as a ubiquitous neurotoxic mechanism of soluble amyloid oligomers. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(17):17294–17300. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500997200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Rovira C, Arbez N, Mariani J. Abeta(25-35) and Abeta(1-40) act on different calcium channels in CA1 hippocampal neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296(5):1317–1321. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Alier KA, Morris BJ. Divergent regulation of Pyk2/ CAKbeta phosphorylation by Ca2+ and cAMP in the hippocampus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1745(3):342–349. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Zhang Z, Neff L, Bothwell ALM, Baron R, Horne WC. Calcitonin induces dephosphorylation of Pyk2 and phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase in osteoclasts. Bone. 2002;31(3):359–365. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00834-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Zhang ZY, Baron R, Horne WC. Integrin engagement, the actin cytoskeleton, and c-Src are required for the calcitonin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin and HEF1, but not for calcitonin-induced Erk1/2 phosphorylation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(47):37219–37223. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001818200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Zhang ZY, Hernandez-Lagunas L, Horne WC, Baron R. Cytoskeleton-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of the p130(Cas) family member HEF1 downstream of the G protein-coupled calcitonin receptor - Calcitonin induces the association of HEF1, paxillin, and focal adhesion kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(35):25093–25098. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.25093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Plotnikova OV, Nikonova AS, Loskutov YV, Kozyulina PY, Pugacheva EN, Golemis EA. Calmodulin activation of Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) is required during ciliary disassembly and in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(14):2658–2670. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-12-1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Plotnikova OV, Pugacheva EN, Dunbrack RL, Golemis EA. Rapid calcium-dependent activation of Aurora-A kinase. Nature communications. 2010;1:64. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Plotnikova OV, Pugacheva EN, Golemis EA. Aurora A kinase activity influences calcium signaling in kidney cells. J Cell Biol. 2011;193(6):1021–1032. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201012061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Yoon H, Choi YL, Song JY, Do I, Kang SY, Ko YH, Song S, Kim BG. Targeted Inhibition of FAK, PYK2 and BCL-XL Synergistically Enhances Apoptosis in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. PLoS One. 2014;9(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Golubovskaya VM, Figel S, Ho BT, Johnson CP, Yemma M, Huang G, Zheng M, Nyberg C, Magis A, Ostrov DA, Gelman IH, Cance WG. A small molecule focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor, targeting Y397 site: 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3, 7-triaza-1-azoniatricyclo [3.3.1.1(3,7)]decane; bromide effectively inhibits FAK autophosphorylation activity and decreases cancer cell viability, clonogenicity and tumor growth in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(5):1004–1013. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Megison ML, Gillory LA, Stewart JE, Nabers HC, Mrozcek-Musulman E, Beierle EA. FAK Inhibition Abrogates the Malignant Phenotype in Aggressive Pediatric Renal Tumors. Molecular Cancer Research. 2014;12(4):514–526. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Schultze A, Fiedler W. Therapeutic potential and limitations of new FAK inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Expert Opin Inv Drug. 2010;19(6):777–788. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2010.489548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature. 2013;499(7456):43–49. doi: 10.1038/nature12222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Cohen HT, McGovern FJ. Renal-cell carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine. 2005;353(23):2477–2490. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Cairns P. Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Biomarkers. 2011;9(1-6):461–473. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2011-0176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Logue JS, Morrison DK. Complexity in the signaling network: insights from the use of targeted inhibitors in cancer therapy. Gene Dev. 2012;26(7):641–650. doi: 10.1101/gad.186965.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou SB, Diaz LA, Kinzler KW. Cancer Genome Landscapes. Science. 2013;339(6127):1546–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.1235122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Beck TN, Chikwem AJ, Solanki NR, Golemis EA. Bioinformatic Approaches to Augment Study of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Lung Cancer. Physiological genomics. 2014 doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00062.2014. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Bagnyukova T, Serebriiskii IG, Zhou Y, Hopper-Borge EA, Golemis EA, Astsaturov I. Chemotherapy and signaling How can targeted therapies supercharge cytotoxic agents? Cancer biology & therapy. 2010;10(9):843–857. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.9.13738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Bird TD. In: Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease. Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Fong CT, Smith RJH, Stephens K, editors. GeneReviews(R); Seattle (WA): 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Tanzi RE, Bertram L. Twenty years of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid hypothesis: a genetic perspective. Cell. 2005;120(4):545–555. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Goedert M, Cohen ES, Jakes R, Cohen P. p42 MAP kinase phosphorylation sites in microtubule-associated protein tau are dephosphorylated by protein phosphatase 2A1. Implications for Alzheimer's disease [corrected] FEBS letters. 1992;312(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81418-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Rosenthal SL, Kamboh MI. Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Genes and the Potentially Implicated Pathways. Current genetic medicine reports. 2014;2:85–101. doi: 10.1007/s40142-014-0034-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncoscience are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES