Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2004 Jun;42(6):2523–2529. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2523-2529.2004

Multifocal Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Producing the PER-1 Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase in Northern Italy

Laura Pagani 1, Elisabetta Mantengoli 2, Roberta Migliavacca 1, Elisabetta Nucleo 1, Simona Pollini 2, Melissa Spalla 3, Rossana Daturi 3, Egidio Romero 1,3, Gian Maria Rossolini 2,*
PMCID: PMC427849  PMID: 15184430

Abstract

Forty-four nonreplicate clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime) and aztreonam, that putatively produced an acquired extended- spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), according to the results of a double-disk synergy test, and that had been involved in nosocomial outbreaks were obtained from six different hospitals in northern Italy and screened for the presence of blaPER ESBL determinants. Twenty isolates, associated with nine independent outbreaks that occurred in five hospitals in the Milan area and its surroundings during 1995-2000, were found to carry an acquired blaPER-1 gene. PER-1 producers representative of the nine outbreaks exhibited a multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype, including resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, aztreonam, meropenem, aminoglycosides, and in most cases, imipenem and ciprofloxacin. An analysis of macrorestriction profiles of their genomic DNAs by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed an overall clonal diversity of the PER-1 producers, although interhospital clonal spread was also observed. The blaPER-1 gene was not transferable and appeared to be chromosomally located. An analysis of the EcoRI and EcoRV restriction fragment length polymorphisms of the blaPER-1 locus revealed identical patterns for all isolates, and the characterization of a 1.9-kb region containing blaPER-1 revealed a conserved structure in representatives of the various clonal lineages. The present findings indicate that MDR P. aeruginosa clones producing the PER-1 ESBL are endemic to this area of northern Italy, where they have been circulating since the mid-1990s and have been associated with several nosocomial outbreaks.


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bacteremia. Infections can be particularly severe in cases of an impaired specific or nonspecific defense, such as that in neutropenic or cancer patients (21).

P. aeruginosa exhibits intrinsic resistance to several antimicrobial agents. The antipseudomonal β-lactams (such as ticarcillin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, and the carbapenems) represent a major weapon against Pseudomonas infections, either for monotherapy or for combination therapy, for which β-lactams almost invariably represent one of the components (5, 21). Therefore, acquired resistance to these agents constitutes a major challenge for anti-Pseudomonas chemotherapy, especially when it is associated with resistance to other classes of drugs, such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones (11).

Several mechanisms can contribute to acquired β-lactam resistance in P. aeruginosa, including β-lactamase production, the upregulation of efflux systems, and a decreased outer membrane permeability (11). Concerning β-lactamase production, mutational derepression of the chromosomally mediated AmpC enzyme remains one of the leading mechanisms of broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance (10). However, acquired extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) encoded by mobile genetic elements, such as serine-β-lactamases of molecular classes A and D and metallo-β-lactamases of molecular class B, are important emerging resistance mechanisms in P. aeruginosa (11, 15, 29).

Among the acquired enzymes, PER-1 is a class A ESBL of notable clinical importance, due to its high level of activity toward oxyimino-cephalosporins and to the broad diffusion achieved by it in some epidemiological settings (16, 17, 20, 28), for which a poorer outcome of infections caused by PER-1 producers has been reported (27). In Italy, PER-1 was previously reported from two hospitals. At the Varese University hospital, sporadic isolates of PER-1-producing P. aeruginosa and Alcaligenes faecalis were detected (20; F. Luzzaro, G. M. Rossolini, M. Perilli, L. Pagani, R. Belloni, L. Lauretti, G. Amicosante, and A. Toniolo, Abstr. 99th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. A-73, 1999), and a PER-1-producing P. aeruginosa clone recently caused a major outbreak in the general intensive care unit (ICU) (12). At the Pavia University hospital, PER-1-producing isolates of Proteus mirabilis that are resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins have recently been detected in various wards (19).

In this study, we report the detection of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates producing the PER-1 ESBL that have been involved in nosocomial outbreaks in various hospitals in northern Italy since 1995. A molecular characterization of these isolates was performed to investigate their relationships and the spreading patterns of the blaPER-1 determinant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical isolates.

The P. aeruginosa strains analyzed in this study were nonreplicate (one per patient) clinical isolates from six different hospitals in Northern Italy (Fig. 1) that were isolated during the period 1995-2000. All isolates were resistant to oxyimino-cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime) and aztreonam and putatively produced a secondary ESBL, according to the results of a double-disk synergy test performed as described below. All isolates had been involved in nosocomial outbreaks, defined on the basis of epidemiological data (three or more nonreplicate nosocomial isolates that showed identical or similar resistance profiles and were spatially and temporally related according to clinical records). In some cases, a single representative per outbreak was obtained, while in other cases multiple isolates from the same outbreak were present. The identification of the isolates was always double-checked by using the GNI card of the Vitek System (BioMérieux, Rome, Italy).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Map of northern Italy showing the locations of the six hospitals from which the P. aeruginosa isolates investigated in this study were isolated. P.A.T., Pio Albergo Trivulzio Hospital; Nig., Niguarda Hospital; S.M., San Matteo Hospital. For each hospital, the total number of isolates and the number of PER-1-positive isolates are reported. The location of the hospital in Varese, from which PER-1-positive P. aeruginosa isolates were previously detected (12), is also shown (shaded in gray).

Susceptibility testing.

In vitro susceptibility was determined by a broth macrodilution procedure using cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (13). The results of susceptibility testing were interpreted according to the criteria of the NCCLS (14). Antimicrobial agents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.) unless otherwise specified. Cefepime and aztreonam were purchased from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Wallingford, Conn.), imipenem was from Merck (Rome, Italy), meropenem was from Astra-Zeneca (Milan, Italy), piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam were from Wyeth (Catania, Italy), and ciprofloxacin was from Bayer (Milan, Italy). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used for quality control purposes in susceptibility testing. Susceptibility to tellurite was tested as described previously (7), using brain heart infusion agar (Oxoid Unipath, Milan, Italy) containing 0.5 mM K2TeO3 (Sigma Chemical Co.). P. aeruginosa K3913/SI, a tellurite-resistant strain from our collection, and P. aeruginosa PAO1 were used as a positive and negative control, respectively.

β-Lactamase assays.

The double-disk synergy test for the detection of ESBL activity was performed essentially as described previously (12) by screening for synergism between clavulanate (represented by a disk of amoxicillin-clavulanate) and ceftazidime, cefepime, or aztreonam. The disks were placed at a distance of 20 mm (center to center). A potentiation of the inhibitory zones of any of the expanded-spectrum β-lactams by clavulanate was considered suggestive of ESBL production. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and P. aeruginosa 87SM (a clinical isolate from our collection that overproduces the AmpC enzyme) were used as negative controls. P. aeruginosa VA-463/98, which produces the PER-1 enzyme (12), was used as a positive control.

Analytical isoelectric focusing (IEF) of crude bacterial lysates for the detection of β-lactamases was carried out in polyacrylamide gels containing ampholines (pH range, 3.5 to 10), as described previously (18). Crude extracts were prepared by sonication from early-stationary-phase cultures grown aerobically at 37°C in antibiotic-free brain heart infusion broth (Biokar Diagnostics, Milan, Italy). β-Lactamase bands were visualized with the chromogenic substrate nitrocefin (Oxoid Unipath) as described previously (18). The activities of the β-lactamase bands separated by IEF against cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam were assayed by a substrate overlay procedure as described previously (18).

Molecular analysis.

Colony blot hybridization was performed as described previously (20) with bacteria grown directly on sterile nitrocellulose filters layered onto MH agar plates (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). P. aeruginosa VA-463/98 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were included as positive and negative hybridization controls, respectively. Southern blot hybridization was carried out on dried gels, as described previously (26). Genomic DNA was extracted from P. aeruginosa as described previously (8). Plasmid DNA extraction was done by the alkaline lysis method (23), by the method of Kado and Liu (9), and by the method of Hansen and Olsen (6). The probe used for hybridization experiments was a PCR-generated amplicon comprising the entire blaPER-1 open reading frame (20) labeled with 32P by the random priming technique by use of a commercial kit (Rediprime II DNA labeling system; Amersham, Milan, Italy). PCR amplification of the blaPER alleles was carried out with primers BLA-PER/F (5′-GGGACARTCSKATGAATGTCA) and BLA-PER/R (5′-GGYSGCTTAGATAGTGCTGAT), as described previously (20). The sequenced region included the coding sequence for the mature PER-1 enzyme and the last 10 amino acids of the signal peptide. The region containing the blaPER-1 gene of isolate Ps101PAT was cloned from a genomic library constructed in the plasmid vector pBC-SK (Stratagene Inc., La Jolla, Calif.) by screening the library with the same blaPER-1 probe used for the hybridization assays (described above). The characterization of the region containing the blaPER-1 gene in other PER-1-positive clones was performed by a PCR mapping and sequencing approach. Primers PER-EXT1/F (5′-CC GGG GAA ATG CAG GCT GA) and PER-EXT1/R (5′-GAA TTC GCT CAT GCT GAA GAT TA), designed for the terminal regions of the cloned fragment, were used for the amplification reaction, and custom primers were used for amplicon sequencing. PCRs were always carried out with the Expand high-fidelity PCR system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and 10 ng of a genomic DNA template under the reaction conditions recommended by the manufacturer. Amplicon sequences were always determined for both strands, as described previously (20).

Analysis of macrorestriction patterns of genomic DNAs by PFGE.

Genomic DNAs for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis were extracted from stationary-phase cultures grown in Luria broth (Sigma) by using a pathogen group reagent kit 3 (Genepath system; Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.). Digestion of the genomic DNAs was carried out with the enzyme SpeI, used as recommended by the enzyme manufacturer (Bio-Rad). PFGE was performed with 1% agarose gels in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (23) at 14°C and 6 V/cm, using a Gene Path apparatus (Bio-Rad). After electrophoresis, the restriction fragments were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. Comparisons of the PFGE patterns were interpreted according to the criteria of Tenover et al. (24).

Gene transfer experiments.

Conjugation experiments were performed on a solid medium (MH agar), with P. aeruginosa 10145/3 (an rpoB his derivative of the reference strain ATCC 10145T) used as a recipient. The initial donor/recipient ratio was 0.1. Mating plates were incubated at 37°C for 8 h. Transconjugants were selected on MH agar containing ceftazidime (50 μg/ml) plus rifampin (300 μg/ml). The detection sensitivity of the assay was ≥5 × 10−8 transconjugants/recipient.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper has been submitted to the EMBL and GenBank databases and assigned accession number AJ621265.

RESULTS

Detection of PER-1-producing P. aeruginosa isolates from different hospitals in northern Italy.

A total of 44 nonreplicate clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were investigated for the presence of acquired blaPER ESBL determinants. The isolates were collected from six different hospitals in northern Italy (Fig. 1) during the period 1995-2000 and fulfilled the following criteria: (i) resistance to oxyimino-cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime) and aztreonam; (ii) putative ESBL production, as indicated by a positive double-disk synergy test between clavulanate and at least one of the compounds mentioned above; and (iii) involvement in a nosocomial outbreak.

A colony blot hybridization assay using a blaPER-1-specific probe yielded positive results for a total of 20 isolates from five different hospitals (Fig. 1). PCR analysis with primers designed for the amplification of known blaPER genes (20) yielded an amplification product of the expected size (966 bp) from each of the 20 hybridization-positive isolates (data not shown). Direct sequencing of the amplification products revealed, in all cases, the presence of a blaPER allele encoding a mature enzyme that was identical to PER-1 (16). The putative ESBL producers that did not carry blaPER-1-related sequences were not investigated further in this study.

A review of the epidemiological data for the 20 PER-1-positive isolates revealed that, overall, they had been involved in nine independent outbreaks in five different hospitals. A single representative of each outbreak (the earliest isolate available) was selected for further investigation (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Sources, antimicrobial susceptibilities, IEF profiles, and PFGE profiles of the nine epidemiologically unrelated PER-1-producing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates investigated in this study

Hospital Isolate Date Warda Specimenb type MIC of antibiotic (μg/ml)c
pIS by IEFd PFGE pattern
CZ FP AT PI PT IP ME CP GM TO NE AK
San Matteo, Pavia Pa34SM November 1997 HAEM Cutaneous swab >32 >32 >32 32 32 >16 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 8.0 A
Pa50SM March 1998 PAED-SU Urine >32 >32 >32 >128 >128 >16 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 32 5.3, 8.3 C
Pa66SM April 1998 ICU Cutaneous swab >32 >32 >32 >128 >128 <4 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 8.0 D
Treviglio Pa105TR September 1995 ICU BAW >32 >32 >32 64 16 ≤4 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 32 5.3, 8.0 F0
Pa144TR September 1998 ICU BAW >32 >32 >32 >128 16 >16 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 8.0 F1
Pio Albergo Trivulzio, Milan Ps101PAT August 1999 LCTF Urine >32 >32 >32 >128 >128 >16 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 6.9, 8.2 E
Niguarda, Milan Pa6NI February 1999 BMT Pharyngeal swab >32 >32 >32 32 16 >16 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 8.0 A
Pa40NI00 February 2000 HAEM Pharyngeal swab >32 >32 >32 16 ≤8 ≤4 >16 ≤1 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 8.4 B
Sondalo Pa1309SO December 1999 NSU Sputum >32 >32 >32 32 16 >16 >16 >4 >16 >16 >32 >64 5.3, 8.0 G
a

HAEM, hematology; PAED-SU, pediatric surgery; LCTF, long-term care facility; BMT, bone marrow transplantation unit; NSU, neurosurgery.

b

BAW, bronchoalveolar washing.

c

CZ, ceftazidime; FP, cefepime; AT, aztreonam; PI, piperacillin; PT, piperacillin-tazobactam (tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml); IP, imipenem; ME, meropenem; CP, ciprofloxacin; GM, gentamicin; TO, tobramycin; NE, netilmicin; AK, amikacin.

d

pls of β-lactamase activities in crude cell extracts, as detected by analytical IEF. In the bioassay, the pI 5.3 enzyme always exhibited activity against cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam; the pI 6.9 enzyme of isolate Ps101PAT exhibited activity against ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam; and the pI 8.0 to 8.4 enzymes did not exhibit ESBL activity.

The susceptibilities to various antimicrobial agents of the nine PER-1-positive isolates that are representative of the nine outbreaks are reported in Table 1. In addition to a uniform resistance to ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam, all isolates were also resistant to meropenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, and netilmicin, and most of them were also resistant to ciprofloxacin and amikacin. More than half of the isolates retained susceptibility to piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam. In the double-disk test for ESBL detection, all of the PER-1 producers exhibited synergy between clavulanate and each extended-spectrum β-lactam (ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam). None of the nine isolates grew in the presence of 0.5 mM tellurite.

Analytical IEF of crude extracts of the nine isolates, coupled with a bioassay to unravel the activities of the separated enzymes against oxyimino-cephalosporins and aztreonam, revealed in each isolate a β-lactamase with a pI of 5.3 that was active on cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam, consistent with the production of the PER-1 ESBL. An enzyme with an alkaline pI (range, 8.0 to 8.4) which did not show ESBL activity in the bioassay was also detectable in each isolate and most likely corresponded to the chromosomally encoded AmpC protein. Finally, an additional enzyme with a pI of 6.9 that exhibited ESBL activity was present in a single isolate (Table 1). The nature of this enzyme was not investigated further in this work.

Clonal relationships of PER-1-producing isolates.

The clonal relationships of the nine PER-1-producing isolates that were representative of the nine outbreaks were investigated by comparing the PFGE profiles of genomic DNAs after digestion with SpeI.

The PFGE profiles exhibited a notable degree of diversity. Only a couple of isolates (Pa34SM and Pa6NI) showed identical profiles (PFGE pattern A), and another couple (Pa105TR and Pa144TR) showed profiles that differed by only three bands (PFGE patterns F0 and F1). All other isolates exhibited profiles that differed from each other by more than four bands (Fig. 2), so the nine PER-1 producers appeared to be distributed in seven different clonal lineages (Table 1). It should be noted, however, that members of some clonal lineages differed from each other by fewer than seven bands (Fig. 2), suggesting a potential (although more distant) relatedness.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

PFGE profiles of genomic DNAs of PER-1-positive P. aeruginosa isolates after digestion with SpeI. The profile of isolate Pa6NI, which was identical to that of Pa34SM, and that of isolate Pa105TR, which was different from that of Pa144TR by three bands, are not shown. DNA size standards are reported on the left.

Different outbreaks were usually associated with different clonal lineages. However, one clone (PFGE profile F) was detected in the same hospital (Treviglio) over an extended period of time, causing two apparently unrelated outbreaks, while another one (PFGE profile A) was detected in two different hospitals (San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy, in 1997 and Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy, in 1999 [Fig. 1; Table 1]). In some hospitals, multiple clones were present (Fig. 1; Table 1).

None of the PER-1 producers that were representative of the nine outbreaks was related to the isolate responsible for a nosocomial outbreak that previously occurred in the general ICU of the Varese Hospital (12), according to PFGE analysis (data not shown).

Transferability, genetic support, and environment of blaPER-1 gene.

The transferability in conjugation experiments of the blaPER-1 determinant to a P. aeruginosa recipient was tested for each of the nine PER-1-positive isolates that were representative of the nine outbreaks. Conjugational transfer of the ESBL determinant was not detected in any case.

Plasmid DNAs were not detectable by agarose gel electrophoresis of either genomic or plasmid DNA preparations from any of the nine PER-1-positive isolates, even when plasmid DNAs were extracted by the method described by Hansen and Olsen (6), which is suitable for detecting large Inc-P2 plasmids, some of the most common plasmids in P. aeruginosa (Fig. 3, top panel; also data not shown). The absence of similar plasmids was also supported by the susceptibility to tellurite exhibited by all isolates (described above). For all of the isolates, Southern blot hybridization with a blaPER-1 probe yielded a hybridization signal corresponding to the band of chromosomal DNA (Fig. 3, bottom panel), suggesting that the blaPER-1 determinant was inserted in the chromosome.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of undigested genomic DNAs of the nine epidemiologically unrelated PER-1-positive P. aeruginosa isolates investigated in this study (top) and results of Southern blot analysis of the same samples with a blaPER-1 probe (bottom). DNA size standards are reported on the left.

The restriction fragment length polymorphism of the blaPER-1 locus was investigated by Southern blotting using the blaPER-1 probe after the digestion of genomic DNAs with EcoRI or EcoRV (neither enzyme cuts inside blaPER-1 [16]). With either enzyme, an apparently identical hybridization profile was observed for all isolates, consisting of a single band of approximately 4.2 kb after digestion with EcoRI and a single band of approximately 6.4 kb after digestion with EcoRV (Fig. 4).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Results of Southern blot analysis of genomic DNAs of the nine epidemiologically unrelated PER-1-positive P. aeruginosa isolates investigated in this study with a blaPER-1 probe after digestion with EcoRI (A) or EcoRV (B). DNA size standards are reported on the left.

A 1.9-kb SmaI-EcoRI genomic DNA fragment containing the blaPER-1 gene was cloned from isolate Ps101PAT (representative of clonal lineage E) into the plasmid vector pBC-SK. Sequencing of the cloned fragment revealed that the blaPER-1 gene from Ps101PAT was identical to that from P. aeruginosa RNL-1 (16). The region downstream of blaPER-1 was virtually identical to that downstream of blaPER-1 in RNL-1 and was remarkably conserved compared to that downstream of blaPER-2 in plasmid pMVP-5 from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium JMC (1) (Fig. 5). The region upstream of blaPER-1 was identical to that upstream of blaPER-1 in RNL-1 for the first 27 bp but abruptly diverged beyond that point, while it exhibited a high degree of similarity for a longer tract with the sequence upstream of blaPER-2 (except for the presence of a 115-bp insertion in the latter) (Fig. 5). An open reading frame (truncated by the SmaI cloning site) is present in the region upstream of blaPER-1 (Fig. 5), and it encodes a putative protein that exhibits 31% similarity with the transposase of an insertion sequence from a marine psychrotrophic bacterium (GenBank/EMBL database entry CAC84124) and less similarity with other (putative) transposases.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Structure of SmaI-EcoRI genomic fragment containing the blaPER-1 gene from P. aeruginosa Ps101PAT and comparison with the region containing blaPER-1 from P. aeruginosa RNL-1 (16) (EMBL/GenBank database entry Z21957) and the region containing blaPER-2 in plasmid pMVP-5 from S. enterica serovar Typhymurium JMC (1) (EMBL/GenBank database entry X93314). The sequence from Ps101PAT is shown in capital letters. The start and stop codons of the blaPER genes are underlined. The start codon of the open reading frame, encoding a transposase-like protein whose translation is shown below the nucleotide sequence, is also underlined. The other sequences are shown in lowercase letters, except when they are different from that of Ps101PAT; in the region upstream of the blaPER genes, “##” indicates that the sequence completely diverges beyond that point. A vertical arrow indicates the point of insertion of an extra 115-bp sequence in the region upstream of blaPER-2.

The structure of the region containing blaPER-1 was investigated, by a PCR mapping and sequencing approach, in representative isolates of the other clonal lineages. The results of these experiments revealed a structure identical to that of Ps101PAT for the blaPER-1-containing regions of isolates Ps34SM (clonal lineage A), Pa40NI00 (clonal lineage B), Pa50SM (clonal lineage C), Pa66SM (clonal lineage D), and Pa105TR (clonal lineage F) (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The antimicrobial susceptibility of P. aeruginosa has been reported to be on the decrease in several settings (4). In Europe, a significant decline in susceptibility rates to β-lactams, quinolones, and aminoglycosides was recently observed for this species (4), and nosocomial outbreaks of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, usually caused by clonal spread, have been described for various European hospitals (for examples, see references 2, 12, 22, and 25). Although surveillance studies that establish baseline resistance patterns by geographic areas are numerous, the mechanisms underlying acquired antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates have been investigated in only a limited number of cases. A better knowledge of those mechanisms could be important for understanding the spreading patterns of resistant strains and of resistance determinants and for devising suitable control strategies.

For this study, we investigated the presence of PER-like ESBL determinants in isolates of P. aeruginosa that exhibited a resistance phenotype that was suggestive of ESBL production and that had been associated with nosocomial outbreaks in various hospitals in northern Italy during 1995-2000. The results showed that P. aeruginosa isolates producing the PER-1 enzyme have been present in hospitals in the Milan area and the surrounding region, where they have been associated with multifocal nosocomial outbreaks, since at least the mid-1990s. The fact that similar isolates were also found at Varese University Hospital (12; Luzzaro et al., Abstr. 99th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.; J. D. Docquier, F. Luzzaro, G. Amicosante, A. Toniolo, and G. M. Rossolini, Letter, Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:910-911, 2001), located in the same region, further supports the notion that PER-1-producing P. aeruginosa isolates have been endemic to this area for several years. In contrast, PER-1 producers were not detected at the Treviso hospital, which is located in a different region of northeastern Italy, suggesting that the resistance determinant may be absent or less widespread in that area. All of the PER-1 producers were not only resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and monobactams, but also exhibited a multidrug-resistant phenotype that included most other antipseudomonal agents, leaving few therapeutic choices. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active among the tested drugs, although one-third of the strains were also resistant to this agent.

PER-1 producers associated with epidemiologically independent outbreaks belonged to multiple clonal lineages, with different lineages usually being present in different hospitals. However, the presence of the same clone in different hospitals was also observed (PFGE type A, detected in two different hospitals, in Milan and Pavia), likely reflecting interhospital spread of the resistant clone caused by the transfer of patients or by subsequent admissions of patients to different hospitals in that area. The polyclonal nature of the PER-1-producing strains was similar to that observed in Turkey, where a remarkable endemicity of PER-1 producers has been reported for several hospitals (28). The relatively broad distribution and polyclonal nature of PER-1-positive P. aeruginosa isolates detected in this area of northern Italy, along with the presence of the blaPER-1 determinant in strains of other species from the same area (19, 20), indicate that the blaPER-1 determinant is also endemic to this region of northern Italy, where it may represent an important emerging resistance determinant in various gram-negative species.

In P. aeruginosa, the blaPER-1 gene has been found either in plasmids (3) or on the chromosome (28, 29). In the isolates investigated in this study, the blaPER-1 determinants were apparently located on the chromosome, as suggested by the results of gene transfer, plasmid extraction, and hybridization experiments. An analysis of the blaPER-1 locus by Southern blotting and by PCR mapping and sequencing revealed a conserved structure in isolates from different clonal lineages, suggesting an overall conservation of the genetic element that delivered the resistance determinant to these strains. Interestingly, for our isolates the size of the EcoRI fragment recognized by the blaPER-1 probe was apparently the same as that found with most isolates from Turkey (28). However, the region upstream of blaPER-1 was different from that in P. aeruginosa RNL-1 (16), suggesting that a certain variability can also exist in the structure of the cognate genetic elements.

The fact that P. aeruginosa isolates producing the PER-1 enzyme tended to exhibit a multidrug-resistant phenotype that usually included aminoglycosides (12, 28; this study) could be related to a linkage between blaPER-1 and aminoglycoside resistance determinants within the same genetic element. We are currently investigating the structure of the element(s) carrying blaPER-1. A preliminary characterization of blaPER-1-flanking regions from these isolates revealed the presence of a gene for an original transposase that could pertain to the genetic element carrying blaPER-1.

Finally, the results of this study also indicated that additional ESBLs are likely present in P. aeruginosa isolates that are resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam. Investigations of these enzymes are currently under way.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grant no. 0035/2002 from Ricerca Corrente IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, and by grant no. 20011068755_003 from MIUR (PRIN 2001).

We thank F. Luzzaro, E. Viganò, A. Berlusconi, G. Ortisi, and P. Troupioti for providing some of the investigated isolates.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bauernfeind, A., I. Stemplinger, R. Jungwirth, P. Mangold, S. Amann, E. Akalin, Ö. Ang, C. Bal, and J. M. Casellas. 1996. Characterization of β-lactamase gene blaPER-2, which encodes an extended-spectrum class A β-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:616-620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bukholm, G., T. Tannaes, A. B. Kjelsberg, and N. Smith-Erichsen. 2002. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with increased risk of patient death in an intensive care unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 23:441-446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Danel, F., L. M. Hall, D. Gur, H. E. Akalin, and D. M. Livermore. 1995. Transferable production of PER-1 β-lactamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:281-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gales, A. C., R. N. Jones, J. Turnidge, R. Rennie, and R. Ramphal. 2001. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: occurrence rates, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and molecular typing in the global SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32(Suppl. 2):S146-S155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giamarellou, H. 2002. Prescribing guidelines for severe Pseudomonas infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:229-233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hansen, J. B., and R. H. Olsen. 1978. Isolation of large bacterial plasmids and characterization of the P2 incompatibility group plasmids pMG1 and pMG5. J. Bacteriol. 135:227-238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jacoby, G. A., L. Sutton, L. Knobel, and P. Mammen. 1983. Properties of IncP-2 plasmids of Pseudomonas spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 24:168-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson, J. L. 1994. Similarity analysis of DNAs, p. 655-682. In P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood, and N. R. Krieg (ed.), Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 9.Kado, C. I., and S. T. Liu. 1981. Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 145:1365-1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Livermore, D. M. 1995. β-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:557-584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Livermore, D. M. 2002. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:634-640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Luzzaro, F., E. Mantengoli, M. Perilli, G. Lombardi, V. Orlandi, A. Orsatti, G. Amicosante, G. M. Rossolini, and A. Toniolo. 2001. Dynamics of a nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing the PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1865-1870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 14.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 13th informational supplement. NCCLS document M100-S13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 15.Nordmann, P., and L. Poirel. 2002. Emerging carbapenemases in gram-negative aerobes. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8:321-331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nordmann, P., and T. Naas. 1994. Sequence analysis of PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and comparison with class A beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:104-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nordmann, P., E. Ronco, T. Naas, C. Duport, Y. Michel-Briand, and R. Labia. 1993. Characterization of a novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:962-969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pagani, L., F. Luzzaro, P. Ronza, A. Rossi, P. Micheletti, F. Porta, and E. Romero. 1994. Outbreak of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Serratia marcescens in an intensive care unit. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 10:39-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pagani, L., R. Migliavacca, L. Pallecchi, C. Matti, E. Giacobone, G. Amicosante, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2002. Emerging extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Proteus mirabilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1549-1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pereira, M., M. Perilli, E. Mantengoli, F. Luzzaro, A. Toniolo, G. M. Rossolini, and G. Amicosante. 2000. PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in an Alcaligenes faecalis clinical isolate resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and monobactams from a hospital in Northern Italy. Microb. Drug Resist. 6:85-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pollack, M. 2000. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, p. 2310-2335. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • 22.Pournaras, S., M. Maniati, E. Petinaki, L. S. Tzouvelekis, A. Tsakris, N. J. Legakis, and A. N. Maniatis. 2003. Hospital outbreak of multiple clones of Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying the unrelated metallo-β-lactamase gene variants blaVIM-2 and blaVIM-4. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1409-1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  • 24.Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsakris, A., S. Pournaras, N. Woodford, M. F. Palepou, G. S. Babini, J. Douboyas, and D. M. Livermore. 2000. Outbreak of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing VIM-1 carbapenemase in Greece. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1290-1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsao, S. G., C. F. Brunk, and R. E. Pearlman. 1983. Hybridization of nucleic acids directly in agarose gels. Anal. Biochem. 131:365-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vahaboglu, H., F. Coskunkan, O. Tansel, R. Ozturk, N. Sahin, I. Koksal, B. Kocazeybek, M. Tatman-Otkun, H. Leblebicioglu, M. A. Ozinel, H. Akalin, S. Kocagoz, and V. Korten. 2001. Clinical importance of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (PER-1-type)-producing Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:642-645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vahaboglu, H., R. Ozturk, G. Aygun, F. Coskunkan, A. Yaman, A. Kaygusuz, H. Leblebicioglu, I. Balik, K. Aidin, and M. Oktun. 1997. Widespread detection of PER-1-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases among nosocomial Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Turkey: a nationwide multicenter study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2265-2269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weldhagen, G. F., L. Poirel, and P. Nordmann. 2003. Ambler class A extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel developments and clinical impact. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2385-2392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES