Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenetic disease with a complex phenotype. Over 1500 mutations in the CFTR gene have been identified; however, the p.F508del mutation is most common. There has been limited correlation between the CFTR mutation genotype and the disease phenotypes. We evaluated the non-p.F508del mutation of 108 p.F508del compound heterozygotes using the biological classification method, Grantham and Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT) scores to assess whether these scoring systems correlated with sweat chloride levels, pancreatic sufficiency, predicted FEV1, and risk of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the last year. Mutations predicted to be ‘mild’ by the biological classification method are associated with more normal sweat chloride levels (p < 0.001), pancreatic sufficiency (p < 0.001) and decreased risk of infection with Pseudomonas in the last year (p = 0.014). Lower Grantham scores are associated with more normal sweat chloride levels (p < 0.001), and pancreatic sufficiency (p = 0.014). Higher SIFT scores are associated with more normal sweat chloride levels (p < 0.001) and pancreatic sufficiency (p = 0.011). There was no association between pulmonary function measured by predicted FEV1 and the biological classification (p = 0.98), Grantham (p = 0.28) or SIFT scores (p = 0.62), which suggests the pulmonary disease related to CF may involve other modifier genes and environmental factors.
Keywords: cystic fibrosis, Grantham, pulmonary function, SIFT, sweat chloride
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a Mendelian autosomal recessive disease that shows phenotypic heterogeneity and can manifest as chronic sinopulmonary disease, pancreatic insufficiency, elevated sodium chloride loss in sweat, male infertility and gastrointestinal abnormalities, including liver disease (Fig. 1). Pulmonary disease is the major cause of mortality in CF subjects (1) and most clinically relevant phenotype. Over 1500 unique mutations have been identified in the CFTR gene (2). The most common allele, p.F508del, has a frequency of over 66% in Caucasians (3). Other mutations have a frequency of less than 5%, although some can be more prevalent in some subpopulations because of founder effects. Because of the vast number of mutations, genetic testing is limited for definitive diagnosis, and the sweat chloride test remains pivotal for diagnosis. Usually, sweat chloride levels above 60 mmol/l are diagnostic (4). There have been multiple efforts to correlate CFTR mutation with phenotype to understand the specific effect of each mutation. The biological classifi-cation score is based on in vitro mutation analysis and is the most accepted classification scheme. Mutations are classified based on known molecular consequences: class I – no synthesis; class II – processing blocked; class III – regulation blocked; class IV – altered conductance; and class V – reduced synthesis (5). Mutations in a higher class are thought to be milder and some class IV and class V mutations have been associated with pancreatic sufficiency (6). Data support a probable correlation between the CFTR mutation and Pseudomonas infection (7). Missense and splice site mutations that are considered mild CF allelic variants have also been associated with lower risk for acquisition of Pseudomonas (8).
Fig. 1.
Factors that may affect the correlation between CFTR genotype and phenotypes.
We analyzed whether genotype–phenotype correlations exist between CFTR mutations and four clinical phenotypes – sweat chloride levels, pancreatic suffi-ciency, pulmonary function measured by the predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (predicted FEV1), and probability of infection with Pseudomonas in the last year. We consider three mutation scoring algorithms – the biological classification, Grantham and Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT) scores and assess whether these scores correlate with the disease phenotypes.
Materials and methods
Subjects
We reviewed clinical data from 435 CF subjects followed at Children’s Hospital, Boston (CHB). Inclusion criteria required subjects to have two copies of a known CFTR mutation or elevated sweat chloride levels (>60 mmol/l). FEV1 was measured by standard spirometry according to American Thoracic Society criteria, and absolute values were converted to a percent-age of the predicted volume (predicted FEV1) expected for a healthy individual of the same age, gender and height (9, 10). Patients were considered pancreatic suf-ficient according to fecal pancreatic elastase level or evidence of malabsorption with a 24-h fecal fat measurement. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at CHB.
Genotyping methods
Genomic DNA was evaluated for the presence of CFTR mutations (Genzyme, San Francisco, CA or Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA) as part of the clinical evaluation. The entire gene was sequenced. None of the subjects had more than one mutation within each CFTR gene and no cis mutations were identified.
Statistical methods
The non-p.F508del alleles of the p.F508del compound heterozygotes (one allele is p.F508del and the other is a known non-p.F508del CFTR mutation) were classified as ‘mild’ if the biological classification score was class IV or V, or ‘severe’ if the biological classification score was class I, II or III. From henceforth, we refer to this modified biological classification score as the biological classification score.
Next, the analysis was restricted to the non-synonymous missense amino acid mutations. Grantham scores were then calculated for each mutation. Grantham scores are a measure of the chemical dissimilarity between the native and the substituted amino acid and are based on the amino acid substitution matrix of Grantham (11). Higher Grantham scores are usually predictive of severe mutations as defined by in vitro assays (12). The SIFT score is correlated with whether the mutation is at an evolutionarily conserved amino acid residue. Mutations that occur in evolutionarily conserved regions are hypothesized to be deleterious and result in a more severe clinical phenotype (13). SIFT score values greater than or equal to 0.05 are predicted as tolerant (14). All non-synonymous missense mutations in the study occurred at evolutionarily conserved sites across the following eight vertebrate orthologs: baboon, macaque, cow, sheep, rabbit, mouse, killifish, and salmon.
Multivariate linear regression models adjusting for age and sex using the biological classification, Grantham and SIFT scores as covariates were used to predict sweat chloride levels and predicted FEV1. Multivariate logistic regression models using these covariates were used to determine the probability of pancreatic insuffi-ciency and risk of Pseudomonas infection in the past year. To ensure robust results, we randomly permuted the biological, Grantham, and SIFT scores 100,000 times to make 100,000 datasets and a permutation test p-value was calculated.
Results
Subjects and genotypes
The genotype distribution for the 435 subjects evaluated is shown in Table 1. A total 24.8% (146) were heterozygous for the p.F508del mutation. Of the 146 p.F508del heterozygotes, a known CFTR mutation was present in 74.0% (108) of the subjects, and the analysis was restricted to these 108 subjects. Twenty-five non-p.F508del alleles were identified (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 1.
Genetic distribution of cystic fibrosis (CF) cohort
| Number of F508del alleles | n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | F508del homozygotes | 174 (40) |
| 1 | One F508del allele and one known non-F508del CFTR mutationa One F508del allele and an unknown mutation |
108 (24.8)a 38 (8.7) |
| 0 | Two known non-F508del alleles One known non-F508del allele and one unknown allele Two unknown alleles |
25 (5.7) 34 (7.8) 56 (12.9) |
| Total | 435 |
The subgroup used for the statistical analysis.
Table 2.
CFTR mutation classification for compound heterozygotesa
| Mutations | n (%) | Biological classification | Grantham score | SIFT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q493X | 3 (3) | Ib | — | — |
| G542X | 21 (20) | Ib, c,e | — | — |
| R553X | 4 (4) | Ib,e | — | — |
| Y1092X | 2 (2) | Ib | — | — |
| R1158X | 1 (1) | NA | — | — |
| W1282X | 9 (9) | Ib,e | — | — |
| G85E | 4 (4) | IIIb | 98 | 0.01 |
| R117H | 4 (4) | IVb,c | 29 | 0.60 |
| R334W | 1 (1) | IVb | 101 | 0.02 |
| R347P | 1 (1) | IVb | 103 | 0.05 |
| R352Q | 1 (1) | NA | 43 | 0.35 |
| G551D | 20 (19) | IIIb,c | 94 | 0.00 |
| R560T | 3 (3) | IIIb | 71 | 0.00 |
| D1270N | 1 (1) | NA | 23 | 0.01 |
| N1303K | 6 (6) | IIg | 94 | 0.00 |
| I507del | 3 (3) | IId | — | — |
| 394delTT | 1 (1) | NAc | — | — |
| 621+1G>T | 7 (7) | Ib,f | — | — |
| 711+1G>T | 2 (2) | Ib | — | — |
| 1717-1G>A | 5 (5) | Ib,c,e,f | — | — |
| 1898+1G>A | 2 (2) | NA | — | — |
| 2789+5G>A | 3 (3) | Vb | — | — |
| 3659delC | 1 (1) | Ib | — | — |
| 3849+10kbC>T | 2 (2) | Vb,c,f | — | — |
| 3905insT | 1 (1) | Ib | — | — |
NA, not applicable; SIFT, Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant.
The following mutations biological classification scores could not be verified: 1898+G-A, 394delTT, D1270N, R352Q, and R1158X.
Ahmed et al. (27).
Wilschanski et al. (28).
Welsh and Smith 29).
McKone et al. (21).
Loubieres et al. (30).
Moskowiz et al. (31).
Table 3.
Biological classification scores for the CFTR mutations in cohort
| Mutation classification | Age | Sex | Sweat chloride level | Predicted FEV1 | Number pancreatic Sufficient | Number infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in past year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Mean (standard deviation) | Male (%) | Mean (standard deviation) | Mean (standard deviation) | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Class I: no synthesis | 15.7 (11.5) | 25 (45.5) | 103.4 (16.2) | 86.7 (19.9) | 2 (4) | 34 (62) |
| Class II: block in processing | 17.9 (12.5) | 5 (55.6) | 109.6 (13.0) | 81.1 (25.7) | 0 (0.00) | 6 (67) |
| Class III: block in regulation | 16.7 (9.6) | 10 (38.5) | 107.8 (16.1) | 82.1 (17.8) | 3 (11) | 20 (77) |
| Class IV: altered conductance | 17.0 (22.4) | 3 (50.0) | 69.4 (38.6) | 58.5 (9.6) | 5 (83) | 1 (17) |
| Class V: reduced synthesis | 14.6 (14.4) | 2 (40.0) | 76.4 (23.9) | 86.5 (17.1) | 2 (40) | 2 (40) |
Relationship between phenotypes
Predicted FEV1 has an approximately normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilks p = 0.61). Although the predicted FEV1 data were normalized for age, duration of disease (age) was strongly associated with worse predicted FEV1 (p = 1.17 × 10−8) suggesting older individuals tend to have worse lung function. Males had higher average predicted FEV1 and lower average sweat chloride values than females, however, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.14 and p = 0.33, respectively). Males were at lower risk of infection over the past year relative to females (OR = 0.44, p = 0.044). Older individuals tended to have higher sweat chloride values (r = 0.41, p = 1.8 × 10−5) and higher odds of Pseudomonas infection (p = 7.6 × 10−6). No significant correlation existed between predicted FEV1 and sweat chloride levels (p = 0.81) or between sweat chloride concentrations and infection status with Pseudomonas after adjusting for age and gender (p = 0.29). These results suggest that the sweat chloride level at diagnosis is not a useful marker of lung function. Pseudomonas infection within the past year was associated with lower predicted FEV1 (p = 1 × 10−4) suggesting that lung infections portend worse lung function.
Biological classification score as a predictor of CF phenotypes
Subjects with ‘mild’ mutations tend to have lower sweat chloride levels than subjects with more ‘severe’ mutations (p < 0.001). This association persisted after adjusting for age and sex (p < 0.001), demonstrating that the in vitro CFTR function correlates with the in vivo sweat chloride levels. There was no significant association between mutation biological classification and predicted FEV1 on either univariate analysis (p = 0.37) or multivariate analysis (p = 0.98) (Table 4). Seven of the eleven subjects with ‘mild’ CF genotypes were pancreatic sufficient compared with 5 of 91 subjects with ‘severe’ CF genotypes (p < 0.001). This association remained statistically significant after adjusting for age and sex (p < 0.001). Subjects with ‘mild’ mutations had a lower probability of Pseu-domonas infection in the previous year. Only 3 of the 11 subjects with ‘mild’ CF genotypes had a Pseu-domonas infection in the previous year compared to 60 out of 90 subjects with ‘severe’ CFTR mutations (p < 0.001). This association remained significant after adjusting for age and sex (p = 0.014).
Table 4.
Evaluation of CFTR mutation scoring methods to predict various components of the CF phenotype
| Mutation classification | Analysis | Sweat chloride level (p-value) | Predicted FEV1 (p-value) | Pancreatic sufficiency (p-value) | Infected with P. aeruginosa in past year (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological classification score (mild vs severe) | Unadjusted | 4.0 × 10−7 | 0.371 | 4.1 × 10−7b | 2.5 × 10−4b |
| Sex and age adjusted | 1.4 × 10−8 | 0.979 | 1.4 × 10−5c | 0.014c | |
| Grantham score | Unadjusted | 4.8 × 10−5a | 0.162a | 0.012c | 0.027c |
| Sex and age adjusted | 3.4 × 10−4a | 0.278a | 0.014c | 0.082c | |
| SIFT score | Unadjusted | 2.1 × 10−7a | 0.330a | 0.009c | 0.046c |
| Sex and age adjusted | <0.001a | 0.624a | 0.011c | 0.058c |
CF, cystic fibrosis; SIFT, Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant.
p-Values calculated from 100,000 permutations of mutation scores.
p-Values calculated using Fisher’s exact test.
p-Values obtained from logistic regression.
Grantham and SIFT scores as predictors of CF phenotypes in p.F508del compound heterozygotes with missense mutations
Higher Grantham scores were associated with higher sweat chloride levels (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with pancreatic insufficiency in the univari-ate (p = 0.012) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.014). Although there appeared to be an association between higher Grantham scores and increased risk of Pseu-domonas infection in the past year in univariate analysis (p = 0.027), this association disappeared in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.082). There was no signifi-cant association between Grantham score and predicted FEV1 on either univariate (p = 0.162) or multivariate analyses (p = 0.278).
Univariate analysis showed that higher SIFT scores were associated with lower sweat chloride levels in both univariate (p < 0.001) and age and sex adjusted analyses (p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between higher SIFT scores and pancreatic sufficiency in both univariate (p = 0.009) and age and sex adjusted analyses (p = 0.011). Subjects with higher SIFT scores had a decreased risk of Pseudomonas infection in the previous year in the univariate analysis (p = 0.046), however, this association was marginal after adjusting for age and sex (p = 0.058).
Discussion
On the basis of biological classification score, more ‘severe’ mutations are associated with higher sweat chloride levels and pancreatic insufficiency. Higher Grantham scores and lower SIFT scores were associated with pancreatic insufficiency and higher sweat chloride levels amongst non-synonymous mutations. The risk of Pseudomonas infection in the last year may be associated with the CFTR mutation, with the risk increased for subjects with more ‘severe’ mutations, higher Grantham scores and lower SIFT scores. The genetic scoring methods considered were not significant predictors of predicted FEV1.
Our findings recapitulate previously published studies that discover no correlation between the pulmonary function of CF subjects measured by predicted FEV1 and the CFTR mutation, and no correlation between the sweat chloride level at age of diagnosis and the predicted FEV1 (15–19). The data support the in vitro biological classification method as a means of classifying the CFTR mutations because milder mutations have been associated with in vivo pancreatic sufficiency and a milder clinical phenotype (6, 20, 21). Urban et al. found that higher Grantham scores and lower SIFT scores were associated with worse in vitro function (12). An analysis of SIFT, Panther and PolyPhen by Dorfman et al. (22) showed that SIFT and Panther are able to predict disease causing mutations, albeit without 100% sensitivity and specificity. Dorfman et al. also showed a positive association between disease severity and SIFT scores, although the association was not significant. These findings suggest that in silico tools capture only some of the information in a mutation and should not be used as clinical diagnostic tools. Finally, Kubesch et al. asserted that CFTR genotype predicts the risk of airway colonization with Pseudomonas (8), possibly directly through its role as an epithelial receptor for this microorganism (7). Murine models of CF have shown these mice have increased susceptibility to colonization with Pseudomonas (23). We find borderline evidence to support this hypothesis.
The major clinical implication of our findings is that sweat chloride levels, pancreatic function, and Pseu-domonas infection risk appear to be associated with the CFTR mutation. This suggests treatments that affect the amount of functional CFTR are probably more likely to affect these phenotypes than the pulmonary phenotype. The pulmonary phenotypic heterogeneity in CF subjects with the same genotype is probably due to modifier genes, non-genetic factors or modifier genes interacting with non-genetic factors.
There are a few study limitations. The cohort is a clinical cohort and not a prospective cohort. Data was collected retrospectively and all data collection was performed blinded to the subjects’ genotypes, and therefore, not likely to affect the results. The power of the study is limited because of the small sample size and the small numbers of subjects with a given CFTR mutation, although our results are very much in concert with previously published reports. The in vivo function of the membrane transporter may differ for a different substrate or the membrane transporter may have a non-transport function (12), therefore the biological classi-fication of a mutation may not capture the complete in vivo impact of the mutation. In addition to the transport of diverse substrates (18), CFTR may have non-transport functions as a receptor for Pseudomonas (16). The p.R117H mutation has a variable penetrance as its splicing efficiency is affected by the length of the poly-T-tract in intron 8 (IVS8-5T, 7T and 9T), therefore the genotyping scoring tools are probably inadequate for evaluation of this mutation (24–26). Finally, although we found no association between CFTR mutation and predicted FEV1, further research should be performed following pulmonary status over time, as a longitudinal assessment of pulmonary function may prove to be more informative.
The diversity of lung disease in CF subjects may not be related to variation in CFTR mutations, as there is considerable phenotypic heterogeneity, even in subjects with the same genotype or class of CFTR mutation. Understanding the complex interplay between mutational variants and phenotype using CF and other monogenic diseases will prove to be important as mutational variants for complex diseases are identified.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr Sudhir Kumar, who provided us with the data on the evolutionarily conserved domains in the CFTR gene. We are also grateful to Solandra Craig, Christopher Garcia and the anonymous reviewers for the critical review of the manuscript. R. S. was supported by a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Pre-Doctoral Fellowship.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
Nothing to declare.
References
- 1.Davis P. Clinical pathophysiology and manifestations of lung disease in cystic fibrosis in adults. Philadelphia, PA: Yankaskas and Knowles; 1999. pp. 45–67. [Google Scholar]
- 2. [Accessed on January 2011];Cystic fibrosis mutation database. www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/cftr.
- 3.Castellani C, Cuppens H, Macek M, Jr, et al. Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice. J Cyst Fibros. 2008;7:179–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wallis C. Atypical cystic fibrosis–diagnostic and management dilemmas. J R Soc Med. 2003;96 (Suppl 43):2–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Drumm ML, Wilkinson DJ, Smit LS, et al. Chloride conductance expressed by delta F508 and other mutant CFTRs in Xenopus oocytes. Science. 1991;254 (5039):1797–1799. doi: 10.1126/science.1722350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kristidis P, Bozon D, Corey M, et al. Genetic determination of exocrine pancreatic function in cystic fibrosis. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;50 (6):1178–1184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pier GB. CFTR mutations and host susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5:81–86. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00290-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kubesch P, Dork T, Wulbrand U, et al. Genetic determinants of airways’ colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 1993;341:189–193. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90062-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Knudson RJ, Lebowitz MD, Holberg CJ, Burrows B. Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:725–734. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.6.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1107–1136. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science. 1974;185 (4154):862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4154.862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Urban TJ, Sebro R, Hurowitz EH, et al. Functional genomics of membrane transporters in human populations. Genome Res. 2006;16:223–230. doi: 10.1101/gr.4356206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miller MP, Kumar S. Understanding human disease mutations through the use of interspecific genetic variation. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:2319–2328. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.21.2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31 (13):3812–3814. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Parad RB, Gerard CJ, Zurakowski D, Nichols DP, Pier GB. Pulmonary outcome in cystic fibrosis is influenced primarily by mucoid Pseu-domonas aeruginosa infection and immune status and only modestly by genotype. Infect Immun. 1999;67:4744–4750. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.9.4744-4750.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Corey M, McLaughlin FJ, Williams M, Levison H. A comparison of survival, growth, and pulmonary function in subjects with cystic fibrosis in Boston and Toronto. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:583–591. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schechter MS, Shelton BJ, Margolis PA, Fitzsimmons SC. The association of socioeconomic status with outcomes in cystic fibrosis subjects in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1331–1337. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.9912100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kogan I, Ramjeesingh M, Li C, et al. CFTR directly mediates nucleotide-regulated glutathione flux. EMBO J. 2003;22:1981–1989. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Davis PB, Schluchter MD, Konstan MW. Relation of sweat chloride concentration to severity of lung disease in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;38:204–209. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Augarten A, Ben Tov A, Madgar I, et al. The changing face of the exocrine pancreas in cystic fibrosis: the correlation between pancreatic status, pancreatitis and cystic fibrosis genotype. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20 (3):164–168. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f36d04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McKone EF, Emerson SS, Edwards KL, Aitken ML. Effect of genotype on phenotype and mortality in cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2003;361 (9370):1671–1676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13368-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dorfman R, Nalpathamkalam T, Taylor C, et al. Do common in silico tools predict the clinical consequences of amino-acid substitutions in the CFTR gene? Clin Genet. 2010;77 (5):464–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Coleman FT, Mueschenborn S, Meluleni G, et al. Hypersusceptibility of cystic fibrosis mice to chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa oropharyn-geal colonization and lung infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:1949–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437901100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Massie RJ, Poplawski N, Wilcken B, Goldblatt J, Byrnes C, Robertson C. Intron-8 polythymidine sequence in Australasian individuals with CF mutations R117H and R117C. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:1195–1200. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.00057001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Noone PG, Pue CA, Zhou Z, et al. Lung disease associated with the IVS8 5T allele of the CFTR gene. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1919–1924. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.2003160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kiesewetter S, Macek M, Jr, Davis C, et al. A mutation in CFTR produces different phenotypes depending on chromosomal background. Nat Genet. 1993;5:274–278. doi: 10.1038/ng1193-274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ahmed N, Corey M, Forstner G, et al. Molecular consequences of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene mutations in the exocrine pancreas. Gut. 2003;52 (8):1159–1164. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.8.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wilschanski M, Zielenski J, Markiewicz D, et al. Correlation of sweat chloride concentration with classes of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations. J Pediatr. 1995;127:705–710. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70157-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Welsh MJ, Smith AE. Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. Cell. 1993;73:1251–1254. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90353-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Loubiéres Y, Grenet D, Simon-Bouy B, et al. Association between genetically determined pancreatic status and lung disease in adult cystic fibrosis patients. Chest. 2002;121 (1):73–80. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moskowitz SM, Chmiel JF, Sternen DL, et al. Clinical practice and genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders. Genet Med. 2008;10 (12):851–868. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818e55a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

