Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr 12;139(1):193–198. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2375-z

Prevalence of germline TP53 mutations in HER2-positive Breast Cancer Patients

Michelle G Rath 1, Serena Masciari 1, Rebecca Gelman 2, Alexander Miron 3, Penelope Miron 3, Kathleen Foley 3, Andrea L Richardson 4, Ian E Krop 1, Sigitas J Verselis 5, Deborah A Dillon 4, Judy E Garber 1
PMCID: PMC4280061  NIHMSID: NIHMS634479  PMID: 23580068

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor in Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a rare inherited cancer syndrome associated with germline mutations in the TP53 gene. Recent data show that breast cancer in germline TP53 mutation carriers is commonly HER2-positive (63–83%). We assessed the prevalence of germline TP53 mutations in a cohort of women with HER2+ breast cancer diagnosed age ≤ 50 years.

Material & Methods

We identified blood specimens from 213 women with primary invasive HER2+ breast cancer age ≤ 50 years from a single center. EGAN sequencing and MLPA techniques were used to screen for germline TP53 mutations.

Results

Among 213 women with HER2+ breast cancer age ≤ 50 years, 3 (ages at diagnosis 23, 32, 44 years) were found to carry a TP53 mutation (1.4%, 95%CI 0.3%–4.1%). ER/PR status was not uniform. Two TP53-carriers met Chompret criteria for LFS; none met classic LFS criteria.

Conclusion

Although two-thirds of breast cancers in women with TP53 mutations are HER2+, we observed a low prevalence of germline TP53 mutations among unselected young women with HER2+ breast cancer. Given the potential clinical impact, consideration of germline TP53 testing should be given to young women with HER2+ breast cancer, especially if family cancer history is notable.

Keywords: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, Breast Cancer, TP53

Introduction

The Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome associated with germline mutations in the TP53 gene (tumor protein TP53, chromosome 17p13; OMIM 191170). Diverse malignancies begin in childhood and early adulthood, classically including soft tissue and bone sarcomas, breast cancers, brain tumors, adrenal cortical carcinomas, and leukemias [15]. A wide range of additional tumors have been shown to develop excessively in individuals with LFS [4, 8, 22, 28]. Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor among women with LFS [10].

Women carrying germline TP53 mutations have a remarkable risk of developing cancer: 50% by age 30 years and 90% by age 60 years [16]. Mean age at first cancer diagnosis among females heterozygous for a germline TP53 mutation in one prospective cohort was 29 years [9]. The reported frequency of germline TP53 mutations in population-based series of women diagnosed with unselected invasive breast cancer before age 30 years ranges from <1% to 4% [5, 12].

Somatic mutations in the TP53 gene are frequent in sporadic basal (83%) and HER2-amplified (70%) breast cancer subgroups [14]. Recent reports have identified an increased frequency of HER2 positive breast cancer in women with LFS [18, 20, 26]. Among young women with breast cancer, HER2 positive tumors comprise 20–25% of tumors, but in series of breast cancers in women with germline TP53 mutations, approximately 63–83% of tumors are HER2 positive by clinical determinations [19, 20, 26]. Therefore, we investigated the frequency of germline TP53 mutations among women aged 50 years or below at diagnosis of HER2 positive breast cancer.

Material & Methods

We searched the Clinical Operations and Research Information System (CORIS) database at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute to identify women with a diagnosis of HER2 positive invasive breast cancer seen in the Breast Oncology Clinic. All patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer, who consented to collection, storage and analysis of their samples (peripheral blood and tumor specimens) for research purposes in Institutional Review Board approved protocols, were included in this database. Blood specimens were retrieved from the annotated Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Spore Core Blood Repository.

The blood sample collection, TP53 germline analysis and all data extraction from the CORIS database and medical records, were approved by the Institutional Review Board. The cohort was comprised of women with primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed at age 50 years or below from the CORIS database who met the following criteria: HER2 amplification on a primary breast cancer specimen by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (3+) and/or Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) (ratio > 2.2 was considered amplified) according to ASCO/CAP guidelines [27]. Equivocal HER2 (2+ by IHC) cases were included only if they were positive by FISH.

All specimens were reviewed clinically in one of the Harvard teaching hospital pathology departments. Tumor ER, PR and HER2-status were reviewed specifically in 70% of cases; otherwise the analysis from the referring hospital was accepted. Data were extracted from clinical pathology reports. Tumors were classified as hormone receptor positive if tumor nuclei staining for estrogen or progesterone receptors by IHC was greater than or equal to 1% according to ASCO/CAP guidelines [27].

Women with initial breast cancer diagnoses between October 1992 and April 2010 and invasive HER2 positive breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤50 years were identified from the database. Personal and family cancer history were extracted from questionnaires completed by all individuals enrolled in the CORIS database and were supplemented by review of subject medical records.

The family cancer diagnoses could not be verified with medical records under the terms of the protocol which precluded further patient contact. Family history information was missing from 6 women who were adopted, and 5 women who did not provide data. Family cancer histories, including the breast cancer in the proband were classified according to two sets of published criteria for LFS, classic and updated Chompret [15, 24].

The classic criteria for LFS families include a sarcoma before age 45 years in a proband, a first-degree relative with any cancer before age 45 years, and another first-degree relative with soft tissue sarcoma or osteosarcoma at any age, or any cancer before age 45 years [15]. The 2009 Chompret criteria, which were derived from the systematic study of LFS kindreds in France include: a proband with a tumor belonging to the narrow LFS tumor spectrum (e.g. soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, brain tumor, premenopausal breast cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, leukemia, and lung bronchoalveolar cancer) diagnosed before age 46 years, with at least one first- or second-degree relative with an LFS tumor (except breast cancer, if the proband has breast cancer) before age 56 years or with multiple tumors; or a proband with multiple tumors, two of which belong to the narrow LFS tumor spectrum (except multiple primary breast cancers) and the first of which occurred before age 46 years; or a patient with adrenocortical carcinoma or a choroid plexus carcinoma, irrespective of family history [24].

A group of 347 women diagnosed at age ≤50 years with initial HER2 positive breast cancer between October 1992 and April 2010 was identified from the CORIS database. One hundred thirty-four subjects were excluded from the analysis for the following reasons: in 71 individuals the HER2-status could not be confirmed; in 23 subjects the carcinoma was exclusively in-situ; peripheral blood DNA-samples were missing from 29 cases, poor DNA quality precluded TP53 analysis in one sample and two patients had high median absolute variation (MAD) values for control probes and were excluded from MLPA-analysis. In addition, we excluded subjects with germline mutations or a sequence variant suspected deleterious in the BRCA1 (n=2) or BRCA2 (n=2) genes and the von Hippel-Lindau gene (n=1). Subjects with other primary cancers before the diagnosis of breast cancer (n=3) were also excluded from the analysis. Therefore, the analysis was limited to 213 women with documented invasive, HER2 positive primary breast cancer as their first malignancy. Among the final cohort, 78 women had previously tested negative for germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

DNA-Extraction

DNA was extracted from patient whole blood samples using a Qiagen DNA extraction kit (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit) according to manufacturer instructions on a Qiacube instrument. This was carried out in the Dana Farber Cancer Institute Breast Cancer SPORE CORE Laboratory.

Germline TP53-Mutation Analysis

Subjects were tested for TP53 alterations using exon grouping analysis (EGAN). EGAN is based on conformation-specific gel electrophoresis (CSGE) [3, 11] and conformation-specific capillary electrophoresis (CSCE) [2, 25]. All coding exons and surrounding intronic sequences were positive and analyzed on ABI3730 sequencers with CAP polymer (Applied Biosystems, CA) using 12 primer pairs. Raw data were processed and sized using Dax software (Van Mierlo Software Consultancy, Eindhoven, NL). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments with aberrant mobility on ABI-3730XL were sequenced. In addition all subject DNA’s were sequenced for Exons 2 and 3. This method permits detection of mutations and polymorphisms in all coding regions as well as splice-site mutations. Analysis of the alterations was performed using the TP53 database at IARC (http://www-p53.iarc.fr/) [7].

MLPA-Analysis

Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)-analysis was performed for the same cohort using the P056 SALSA MLPA kit (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, NL) according to manufacturer instructions. A total of 100ng of DNA were used from each individual. PCR was done in 25μl reactions. Analysis of samples was divided into three sets and each performed in a quadrant of a 384 well plate. At least five control samples were added to each quadrant. Detection was performed on ABI3730 (Applied Biosystems, CA) sequencers. Raw data were processed and sized using Dax software (Van Mierlo Software Consultancy, Eindhoven, NL). Coffalyser software (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, NL) was used for data analysis and visualization. For each sample median absolute variation (MAD) of control probes, ratio calls as well as standard error for each TP53 specific probe were determined. The overall median absolute variation (MAD) of control probes in the data set was at 0.07.

Statistics

Exact 95% binomial confidence limits (CI) were calculated for the percent of women who had TP53 germline mutations, both overall (all women < 51 years old) and in the subset of women < 40 years old and the subset ≥ 41 years (an age division that was pre-specified in the study protocol). The distribution of various characteristics was compared between patients < 40 years and patients ≥ 40 years old at diagnosis using Fisher exact tests. All test results are two-sided, but not corrected for multiple comparisons.

Results

213 women with confirmed HER2+ breast cancer diagnosed at age 50 years or below were identified from the CORIS database and were included in the analysis (Table 1). Most tumors were ductal (n=192, 90%), high grade (Grade III n=146, 69%) and hormone receptor positive (ER+ n=144, 68%; PR+ n=121, 57%). Eighty-one patients were under 40 years at their breast cancer diagnosis. Their tumors were also most often ductal (n=73, 90%), high grade (n=59, 73%) and hormone receptor positive (ER+ n=53, 65%; PR+ n=44, 54%). As expected, the younger patients were more likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (44% vs. 28%, p = 0.02 when patients with metastases at diagnosis were omitted) and more likely to have been tested for BRCA mutations (53% vs. 27%, p = 0.0001). Younger patients were also more likely to be HER2 IHC 3+ (99% vs 89%, p=0.01), to have no FISH done or to be negative by FISH (93% vs. 79%, p=0.01).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Cohort (n=213)

Age groups: 23–39 (%) 40–50 (%) Total (%)

Total: 81 132 213
Grade:

G1 1 (1) 1 (1) 2 (1)
G2 21 (26) 42 (32) 63 (30)
G3 59 (73) 87 (66) 146 (69)
N/A 2 (1) 2 (1)

Histology:

Ductal 73 (90) 119 (90) 192 (90)
lobular 1 (1) 1 (1)
mixed ductal/lobular 4 (5) 9 (7) 13 (6)
mucinous 1 (1) 2 (1) 3 (1)
papillary 1 (1) 1 (1) 2 (1)
N/A 1 (1) 1 (1) 2 (1)

Neoadjuvant Therapy:

Yes 36 (44) 37 (28) 73 (34)
No 42 (52) 86 (65) 128 (60)
metastasis at dx 3 (4) 9 (7) 12 (6)

Her2 Status:

IHC 3+, FISH N/A 74 (91) 104 (79) 178 (84)
IHC 3+ and FISH + 5 (6) 14 (11) 19 (9)
IHC 2+, FISH + 1 (1) 12 (9) 13 (6)
FISH + 2 (2) 2 (1)
IHC 3+, FISH − 1 (1) 1 (1)

Estrogen-Receptor-Status:

positive 53 (65) 91 (69) 144 (68)
negative 28 (35) 41 (31) 69 (32)

Progesterone-Receptor-Status:

positive 44 (54) 77 (58) 121 (57)
negative 37 (46) 55 (42) 92 (43)

BRCA 1/2-Testing:

not tested 38 (47) 97 (74) 135 (63)
BRCA 1/2 negative* 43 (53) 35 (27) 78 (37)
*

6 of the BRCA 1/2 negative patients had variants (UV and 2 polymorphisms): 5 (12%) of the patients < 40 who had BRCA 1/2 testing and 1 (3%) of the patients ≥ 40 who had BRCA1/2 testing

In three subjects, a deleterious germline TP53 mutation was identified: two missense mutations R110H (c.329G>A) and G334R (c.1000G>C), and one nonsense mutation R196X (c.586C>T). A novel intronic change 5 base pairs upstream of exon 10 which may affect splicing (IVS994-5T>C) was detected in a woman with breast cancer at age 50 years, but was not considered a mutation for this report. All mutations have been reported previously in the IARC repository [7]. The MLPA analysis showed no significant alteration in TP53 copy number, including insertions and deletions in the TP53 gene in any of the samples analyzed.

The youngest mutation carrier (age of diagnosis 23 years, c.586C>T) had an invasive ductal, grade III, T1N0M0, ER/PR positive, HER2 positive unilateral breast cancer. Her family history met Chompret criteria for LFS (an uncle had a brain tumor at age 9 years). The second individual with a germline TP53 mutation (32 years at diagnosis, c.329G>A) had an invasive ductal, grade III, T2N0M0, ER/PR negative HER2-positive breast cancer. Her family history did not meet classic or Chompret criteria for LFS, though there were other relatives with breast cancer in the family. The third mutation carrier (c.1000G>C) was diagnosed at age 44 years with a grade II, T1N0M0, mixed ductal-lobular, ER/PR positive HER2 positive breast cancer. Her family history met Chompret criteria (an aunt died of leukemia at age 14 years).

Five subjects developed second cancers after their breast cancer diagnosis including one each acute myeloid leukemia, endometrial cancer, bladder cancer, parotid cancer and papillary thyroid cancer. None of these subjects with a second cancer diagnosis was found to carry a germline TP53 mutation.

The overall frequency of germline TP53 mutations in the cohort of women diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer age 50 years or below was 3 of 213 (1.4%, 95%CI 0.3% to 4.1%). Among women younger (under 40 years) at diagnosis of HER2 positive breast cancer, the prevalence was 2/81 (2.5%, 95%CI 0.3% to 8.7%). In the total cohort of 213 patients, none met classic criteria for LFS, however 18 patients (8%) met Chompret criteria. Among women ≤ 50 years old at diagnosis whose family history was consistent with Chompret criteria, 2 of 18 (11%, 95%CI 1.4% to 34.7%) had TP53 mutations. Among women without a known family history consistent with Chompret criteria, TP53 mutations were found in only 1/195 (0.5%, 95% CI 0.01% to 2.9%).

Discussion

Recent reports have shown that a higher proportion of invasive breast cancers in women with germline TP53 mutations are HER2 positive than in other women. Wilson et al. compared the pathological characteristics of 12 breast cancers arising in nine subjects carrying pathogenic TP53 mutations to a reference panel of 231 women with young onset breast tumors defined as ≤ 30 years [26] and found a significantly higher prevalence of HER2 amplification (83%) in germline TP53 mutation carriers compared to a cohort of young onset breast cancer cases (16%, ≤ 30 years); ER and PR status were equally distributed between groups [26]. Another series from the MD Anderson Cancer Center noted similar results (67% were HER2 positive and 70% ER and/or PR positive) among 30 TP53 mutation carriers [20]. Our group has reported similar findings on behalf of a consortium [18]. Among 43 tumors in 39 women (age range 22–60 years at diagnosis) with confirmed germline TP53 mutations, 63% of the invasive ductal and 73% of the ductal carcinomas in situ were HER2 positive by IHC and/or FISH [18]. Given the rarity of germline TP53 mutations, (estimated prevalence 0.06% to 0.5%), Bayes’ theorem can be used to predict that between 0.4% and 3% of women diagnosed with a HER2 positive breast cancer at age < 50 years or below would carry a germline TP53 mutation. The prevalence we found is consistent with that prediction.

In this study we identified three women with germline TP53 mutations in a cohort of 213 women with confirmed HER2-positive invasive breast cancer from a single institution diagnosed at age 50 years or below (1.4%, 95%CI 0.3% to 4,1%). None of the women with a deleterious TP53 mutation met classic LFS criteria; two women met Chompret criteria. Conversely, 2 (11%) of the 18 women whose family histories met Chompret criteria were found to carry germline TP53 mutations. One of the TP53 mutation carriers would not have been identified if family history criteria alone had been used to determine who should be tested.

Two groups have reported the prevalence of germline TP53 mutations in population-based series of young women with breast cancer unselected for subtype. Lalloo et al. reported germline TP53 pathogenic mutations in 4% of breast cancer patients diagnosed ≤ 30 years (n=99) [12, 13]. Chompret et al. detected 3 germline TP53 mutations among 116 breast cancer patients (2.5%) diagnosed ≤ 35 years[1]. In our study, among women diagnosed ≤ 35 years with HER2 positive breast cancer only, we identified 2 TP53 mutation carriers among 40 women (mutation prevalence 2/40 = 5%).

The study does have limitations. All individuals were seen at a single center; the group is not population-based. Further, the size of the cohort is small. Family-history information for some pedigrees is likely to be incomplete, as it was provided by women in a questionnaire at diagnosis and by physicians in notes created in the context of usual clinical oncology care, and could not be confirmed according to the terms of this protocol. HER2 was not always tested at time of diagnosis but sometimes tested at a later date, raising the issue of biases that could have been caused by some association of year of diagnosis, year of recurrence or metastases, survival time, and likelihood of TP53 mutation. Despite these limitations, this is the first study to date looking at the prevalence of TP53 mutations in subjects with younger onset (age 50 years or below) HER2 positive breast cancer.

According to the 2011 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for TP53 testing, in addition to women whose family histories meet classic LFS or Chompret criteria, it is reasonable to test individuals with breast cancer diagnosed before age 30 years with a negative BRCA1/2 test, especially if there is a family history of tumors associated with LFS [21]. Our series suggests that this approach may be too restrictive. Family history is not always reported accurately: only 55% of other LFS-related cancers have been accurately reported in classic Li-Fraumeni families undergoing genetic testing, possibly because many Li-Fraumeni-associated tumors are uncommon, or because patients may not recall ages at cancer diagnosis in relatives [23]. The frequency of de novo mutations in LFS is not insignificant (7%–20%) [6].

It is potentially important to recognize women with TP53 mutations at the time of their breast cancer diagnosis. Like women with BRCA1/2 germline mutations, they may wish to manage the increased risk of a second primary breast cancer with prophylactic contralateral mastectomies. Further, there are data suggesting an increased risk of radiation-associated cancers in women with TP53 germline mutations, who might therefore avoid therapeutic radiation, if possible [16, 17]. In contrast to BRCA1/2 carriers, women with LFS will still have a significant residual risk of life-threatening malignancies at other sites over their lifetimes.

The recent observation of an increased prevalence of HER2-positive breast cancers in women with germline TP53 mutations raises questions about the biology of breast cancer development in this cohort. The majority of basal-like and BRCA1-associated breast cancers have somatic mutations in TP53, yet are not HER2 positive. One possibility is that the order of mutation acquisition contributes to the breast cancer subtype. An alternate hypothesis to explain the increased frequency of HER2 positive breast cancers in germline TP53 mutation carriers compared with basal-like breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers could be a different cell of origin.

In this study, we identified a low prevalence of germline TP53 mutations among women diagnosed with HER2 positive breast cancers before age 50 years. As the field of oncology move to more comprehensive molecular analyses of patient tumor and germline tissue at the time of a new breast cancer diagnosis, we will likely be able to refine the characteristics that predict for identification of germline TP53 mutations. Analysis of other series will be helpful in reaching more definitive estimates of the prevalence of mutation carriers among patients with HER2 positive breast cancer at young age.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the TP53-mutation carriers

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
Age at diagnosis 23 32 44
Histology ductal ductal mixed ductal-lobular
ER + +
PR + +
BRCA-Testing not tested negative negative
TP53 Mutation c.586C>T c.329G>A c.1000G>C
TP53 Protein Change p.R196X p.R110H p.G334R

Acknowledgments

Dr. Elgene Lim for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Research support: The work was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and the Dana- Farber/Harvard Cancer Center SPORE in Breast Cancer Grant (# P50 CA89393). Michelle Rath received funding from the German Research Foundation.

Footnotes

Disclosure: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Chompret A, Abel A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Brugieres L, Pages S, Feunteun J, Bonaiti-Pellie C. Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53 germline mutation screening. J Med Genet. 2001;38:43–47. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davies H, Dicks E, Stephens P, Cox C, Teague J, Greenman C, Bignell G, O’Meara S, Edkins S, Parker A, Stevens C, Menzies A, Blow M, Bottomley B, Dronsfield M, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Wooster R. High throughput DNA sequence variant detection by conformation sensitive capillary electrophoresis and automated peak comparison. Genomics. 2006;87:427–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.11.008. doi: S0888-7543(05)00327-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ganguly A, Rock MJ, Prockop DJ. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of single-base differences in double-stranded PCR products and DNA fragments: evidence for solvent-induced bends in DNA heteroduplexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:10325–10329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garber JE, Goldstein AM, Kantor AF, Dreyfus MG, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Li FP. Follow-up study of twenty-four families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cancer Res. 1991;51:6094–6097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ginsburg OM, Akbari MR, Aziz Z, Young R, Lynch H, Ghadirian P, Robidoux A, Londono J, Vasquez G, Gomes M, Costa MM, Dimitrakakis C, Gutierrez G, Pilarski R, Royer R, Narod SA. The prevalence of germ-line TP53 mutations in women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 30. Fam Cancer. 2009;8:563–567. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9287-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gonzalez KD, Buzin CH, Noltner KA, Gu D, Li W, Malkin D, Sommer SS. High frequency of de novo mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Med Genet. 2009;46:689–693. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.058958. doi: jmg.2008.058958 [pii] 10.1136/jmg.2008.058958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hernandez-Boussard T, Rodriguez-Tome P, Montesano R, Hainaut P. IARC p53 mutation database: a relational database to compile and analyze p53 mutations in human tumors and cell lines. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Hum Mutat. 1999;14:1–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)14:1<1::AID-HUMU1>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Li FP. Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:606–611. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.8.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hwang SJ, Lozano G, Amos CI, Strong LC. Germline p53 mutations in a cohort with childhood sarcoma: sex differences in cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:975–983. doi: 10.1086/374567. doi: S0002-9297(07)60618-1 [pii]10.1086/374567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kleihues P, Schauble B, zur Hausen A, Esteve J, Ohgaki H. Tumors associated with p53 germline mutations: a synopsis of 91 families. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:1–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Korkko J, Annunen S, Pihlajamaa T, Prockop DJ, Ala-Kokko L. Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1681–1685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lalloo F, Varley J, Ellis D, Moran A, O’Dair L, Pharoah P, Evans DG. Prediction of pathogenic mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer by family history. Lancet. 2003;361:1101–1102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12856-5. doi: S0140-6736(03)12856-5 [pii] 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12856-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lalloo F, Varley J, Moran A, Ellis D, O’Dair L, Pharoah P, Antoniou A, Hartley R, Shenton A, Seal S, Bulman B, Howell A, Evans DG. BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 mutations in very early-onset breast cancer with associated risks to relatives. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:1143–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.032. doi: S0959-8049(06)00213-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Langerod A, Zhao H, Borgan O, Nesland JM, Bukholm IR, Ikdahl T, Karesen R, Borresen-Dale AL, Jeffrey SS. TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R30. doi: 10.1186/bcr1675. doi: bcr1675 [pii] 10.1186/bcr1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li FP, Fraumeni JF., Jr Soft-tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, and other neoplasms. A familial syndrome? Ann Intern Med. 1969;71:747–752. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-71-4-747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li FP, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Mulvihill JJ, Blattner WA, Dreyfus MG, Tucker MA, Miller RW. A cancer family syndrome in twenty-four kindreds. Cancer Res. 1988;48:5358–5362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Limacher JM, Frebourg T, Natarajan-Ame S, Bergerat JP. Two metachronous tumors in the radiotherapy fields of a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Int J Cancer. 2001;96:238–242. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Masciari S, Dillon DA, Rath M, Robson M, Weitzel JN, Balmana J, Gruber SB, Ford JM, Euhus D, Lebensohn A, Telli M, Pochebit SM, Lypas G, Garber JE. Jun) Breast cancer phenotype in women with TP53 germline mutations: a Li-Fraumeni syndrome consortium effort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133:1125–1130. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1993-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Masciari SD D, Dick MG, Robson ME, Weitzel JN, Ford JM, Balmaña J, Gruber SB, Euhus D, Garber JE. ASCO. Vol. 2011. Chicago, USA: 2011. Breast cancer phenotype in women with TP53 germ-line mutations: An LFS consortium effort. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Melhem-Bertrandt A, Bojadzieva J, Ready KJ, Obeid E, Liu DD, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Litton JK, Olopade OI, Hortobagyi GN, Strong LC, Arun BK. Early onset HER2-positive breast cancer is associated with germline TP53 mutations. Cancer. 2012;118:908–913. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: practice guidelines in oncology-v1. 2010 genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian: Li-Fraumeni syndrome. 2011 Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/genetics_screening.pdf.
  • 22.Nichols KE, Malkin D, Garber JE, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Li FP. Germ-line p53 mutations predispose to a wide spectrum of early-onset cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:83–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schneider KA, DiGianni LM, Patenaude AF, Klar N, Stopfer JE, Calzone KA, Li FP, Weber BL, Garber JE. Accuracy of cancer family histories: comparison of two breast cancer syndromes. Genet Test. 2004;8:222–228. doi: 10.1089/gte.2004.8.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tinat J, Bougeard G, Baert-Desurmont S, Vasseur S, Martin C, Bouvignies E, Caron O, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Berthet P, Dugast C, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Frebourg T. 2009 version of the Chompret criteria for Li Fraumeni syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:e108–109. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7967. author reply e110. doi: JCO.2009.22.7967 [pii]10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Velasco E, Infante M, Duran M, Perez-Cabornero L, Sanz DJ, Esteban-Cardenosa E, Miner C. Heteroduplex analysis by capillary array electrophoresis for rapid mutation detection in large multiexon genes. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:237–246. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.482. doi: nprot.2006.482 [pii] 10.1038/nprot.2006.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wilson JR, Bateman AC, Hanson H, An Q, Evans G, Rahman N, Jones JL, Eccles DM. A novel HER2-positive breast cancer phenotype arising from germline TP53 mutations. J Med Genet. 2010 Nov;47:771–774. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.078113. doi: jmg.2010.078113 [pii] 10.1136/jmg.2010.078113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A, McShane LM, Paik S, Pegram MD, Perez EA, Press MF, Rhodes A, Sturgeon C, Taube SE, Tubbs R, Vance GH, van de Vijver M, Wheeler TM, Hayes DF. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:118–145. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775. doi: JCO.2006.09.2775 [pii] 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wong P, Verselis SJ, Garber JE, Schneider K, DiGianni L, Stockwell DH, Li FP, Syngal S. Prevalence of early onset colorectal cancer in 397 patients with classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:73–79. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.014. doi: S0016-5085(05)02055-X [pii] 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES