Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2009 Jan 12;119(3):445–451. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.775221

Table 4.

Comparison of Demographic, Surgical, Electrophysiologic, Echocardiographic, and MRI Baseline Characteristics of PVR and Control Groups.

PVR Control p



Median Age at Review (y) 25.5 (7.3-59.9) 25.8 (7.2-60.8) 0.98
TOF Repair type (#, %) 0.86
 TAP 56 (72.7) 54 (70.1)
 Conduit 21 (27.3) 23 (29.9)
Decade of TOF repair (#, %) 0.84
 1950-1969 7 (9.1) 5 (6.5)
 1970-1979 23 (29.9) 18 (23.4)
 1980-1989 26 (33.8) 31 (40.3)
 1990-1999 21 (27.3) 23 (29.9)
Median Age at TOF repair (y) 1.3 (0-27.1) 2.9 (0-28.4) 0.17
Pre-PVR VT 6 (7.8) 7 (9.1) 1.00
Median QRSdur at PVR (msec) 158 (86-224) 148 (82-200) 0.11
Echo parameters (median)
 LV dysfunction (n=68) none none 0.13
 RV dysfunction (n=43) mild none <0.001
 RV dilation (n=21) moderate moderate 0.03
MRI Parameters
 RV EF % (n=33)
  Mean 46 (10) 50 (8) 0.04
  Median 44 (20-67) 52 (33-63)
 LV EF % (n=31)
  Mean 61 (9) 59 (6) 0.39
  Median 62 (41-76) 58 (44-71)
 RVEDVi (n=33)
  Mean 196 (76) 132 (38) <0.001
  Median 194 (65-424) 122 (75-232)