Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biotechnology Research International logoLink to Biotechnology Research International
. 2014 Dec 17;2014:571520. doi: 10.1155/2014/571520

Assessing the Effect of Composting Cassava Peel Based Substrates on the Yield, Nutritional Quality, and Physical Characteristics of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer

N K Kortei 1,*, V P Dzogbefia 2, M Obodai 3
PMCID: PMC4281436  PMID: 25580299

Abstract

Cassava peel based substrate formulations as an alternative substrate were used to grow mushrooms. The effect of two compost heights, three composting periods on the mycelia growth, physical characteristics, yield, and nutritional qualities of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer was studied. Mean mycelia growth of 16.2 cm after a period of seven (7) weeks was the best for 1.5 m compost height. Cap diameter and stipe length differed significantly (P < 0.05) with the compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m). The yield on compost height of 1.5 m, composted for 5 days, differed significantly (P < 0.05) from that of 0.8 m and gave increasing yields as follows: cassava peels and manure, cassava peels only, cassava peels and corn cobs (1 : 1 ratio), and cassava peels and corn cobs (1 : 1 ratio) with chicken manure. Composting periods (3 and 7 days) gave varying yields depending on the compost height. Based on the findings an interaction of 1.5 m compost height and 5 days composting period on cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) with chicken manure produced the best results. The nutritional quality of the mushrooms also differed significantly (P < 0.05), indicating that cassava peels could be used as a possible substrate in cultivation of mushroom.

1. Introduction

In the cultivation of mushrooms, various lignocellulosic wastes are used as substrates and these act as sources of nutrients for their growth [1]. These wastes include, among other cereal grains, rice straw, wheat straw, cottonseed hulls, soybean meal, and sawdust [2–5]. Due to varying nutrients in the substrates, different mushroom yields have been recorded by various workers [6, 7]. Pleurotus spp. are macrofungi which utilize polysaccharides (cellulose and hemicelluloses) from various lignocelluloses to produce expensive protein for human consumption [8, 9]. Their global economic value is now incredible, and the reason for the rise in consumption is a combination of their value as food [10, 11] and their medicinal or nutraceutical properties [12–15].

Composting is an aerobic process in which microorganisms convert a mixed organic substrate into carbon dioxide (CO2), water, minerals, and stabilized organic matter. It is a solid-state fermentation process, which exploits the phenomenon of microbial degradation and mineralization [16, 17]. Control of environmental conditions during the process distinguishes composting from natural rotting or decomposition [18]. Controlled conditions, particularly of moisture and aeration, are required to yield temperatures (49°C–60°C) conducive to the microorganisms involved in the composting process [19]. Temperature is the main factor that controls microbial activity during composting [20].

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae) is the sixth most important food crop globally, in terms of annual production [21], and is a staple food for approximately 800 million people [22, 23]. This perennial root crop is grown in the tropics, including sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Pacific Islands, and Central and South America [23–25]. In Ghana its annual production is approximately 6.6 million metric tons [26] and total production for 2010 was 13,504,100 tonnes [21]. The peel is a byproduct of processing the roots for starch, cassava flour, and “gari” (a fermented cassava meal product) which constitute 11% of the root, with approximately 400,000 MT (dry matter basis) of it produced annually [27]. Cassava peels and corncobs are lignocellulosic materials which consist of three main components, namely, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [28, 29].

This paper presents the effect of composting height, period, and supplementation with chicken manure on the yield, nutritional quality, and some physical characteristics of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer cultivated on different cassava peel based substrate formulations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Spawn and Compost Preparation

Cultures of P. ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer strain EM-1 originally from Mauritius were maintained on potato dextrose agar slants and used to prepare sorghum grain spawn [33]. Compost was prepared by the outdoor single-phase solid waste fermentation. Dried cassava peels and corncobs substrates were reduced to average particle sizes of 0.5 cm2 and 1.2 cm2, respectively. Substrates were obtained from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) campus and its environs, Kumasi. The substrates were mixed with chicken manure and lime and composted as described by [34]. The mixture was then stacked into a heap of 1.5 m height and 1.5 m base width, as well as 0.8 m height and 0.8 m width, and left to compost for varying number of days (3, 5, and 7) with regular turnings every 2 days. Moisture content was adjusted to approximately 68–70% [35]. Compost sizes (105 kg and 315 kg) used in this study were directly related to the respective compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m).

2.2. Preparation of Substrate Mixtures

At the end of the composting period, varying combinations of cassava peels and corncob mixtures were prepared and bagged. Substrate mixtures obtained were as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Substrate compositions and codes of the experiment.

Substrate code Substrate composition
cm 100% cassava peels + chicken manure
ncm 100% cassava peels + no chicken manure
cmcc 50% cassava peels + 50% corncobs + chicken manure
ncmcc 50% cassava peels + 50% corncobs + no chicken manure
Open in a new tab

Amount of chicken manure added was 16.5 kg (10% w/w).

2.3. Bagging

One kilogram of each substrate mixture was bagged into heat resistant polypropylene bags of dimension 29 × 9 cm. For each treatment, 8 replicates were used.

2.4. Sterilization

The bagged substrates were then sterilized with moist heat in drums at temperatures of 95–100°C for 2.5 hours.

2.5. Inoculation, Incubation, and Cropping

The bags were inoculated with 5 g of spawn and incubated at ambient temperature (28–32°C) for approximately 35 days. From the incubation room, the bags were sent to the cropping house where the compost bags were placed on horizontal shelves. They were slit open at the neck in the cropping house where humidity of 80–85% was maintained by watering twice a day.

2.6. Mycelial Growth, Cap Diameter, Stipe Length, and Yield Measurements

  1. Mycelial growth = (longest growth + shortest growth)/2

  2. Average cap diameter = (longest + shortest cap diameter)/2

  3. Stipe length = length of cap base to end of stalk

  4. Yield = biological efficiency (B.E) (%) = fresh weight of mushrooms/dry weight of substrates × 100.

2.7. Proximate Analysis

All the moisture, fat, ash, protein, and carbohydrate content were determined by Association of Official Analytical Chemists Methodology [36].

2.8. Dietary Fibre

The content of soluble, insoluble, and total fibre was determined using AOAC 991.43 method [36].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All experiments performed were subjected to analyses of variance (one-way ANOVA) and then significant differences were determined using Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT) with SPSS 16 (Chicago, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mycelial Growth

The various substrate combinations and composting treatments (Table 1) resulted in different growth responses due to the relative distribution of nutrients. Mycelial growth was significantly (P < 0.05) affected by compost height, composting period, substrate combination, and supplementation (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Higher compost heights and longer composting periods provided sufficient temperatures for microbial activities which allowed for greater decomposition of polysaccharides into smaller units for usage by microorganisms and mushroom mycelia. This was evident in producing the longest mycelia length of 16.3 cm on ncmcc (50% cassava peels + 50% corncobs + no chicken manure) of 5 days' composting period and 1.5 m height at the end of the seventh (7th) week of incubation (Figure 5). The shortest mycelia length of 8.1 cm was recorded by 100% cassava peels composted for 3 days of 0.8 m height (Figure 1). Generally, cm and ncm (100% cassava peels + chicken manure and 100% cassava peels + no chicken manure, resp.) and their interactions performed poorly. Conversely, mixture of cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) and its interactions supported good mycelia growth perhaps because of its porosity and high proportion of cellulose [37]. Mixtures of various agricultural wastes have been reported by Akinyele and Adetuyi [38] to give good yields of mushroom mycelia. Additionally, this substrate mixture possesses a better C/N ratio of about 159.12 compared to the C/N ratio of cassava peels (Table 2) [28]. This agrees with the findings of Mantovani et al. [39] who reported that greater C/N ratios promoted good fungal growth as they investigated the effect of the addition of nitrogen sources to cassava fiber and carbon-to-nitrogen ratios on fungal growth.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 0.8 m compost height and 3 days' composting period.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 0.8 m compost height and 5 days' composting period.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 0.8 m compost height and 7 days' composting period.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 1.5 m compost height and 3 days' composting period.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 1.5 m compost height and 5 days' composting period.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 1.5 m compost height and 7 days' composting period.

Table 2.

Chemical analysis of substrates (dry weight) used in experiments.

Waste Moisture (%) Ash (%) Nitrogen (%) Protein (%) Carbon (%) C/N pH
Cassava peels 2.42 6.46 1 6.25 44.82 44.82 5.7
Corncobs 2.39 1.98 0.4 2.5 45.66 114.2 4.74
Chicken manure 3.3 18.50 2 30 7 3.5 6.3
Open in a new tab

Source: [28, 30–32].

Interplay of these factors on mycelia colonization rate confirms the fact that both the substrate formula and the strain used affect mycelial growth rate and therefore the incubation and crop cycle duration [2, 39]. There was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in the growth of mycelia on combined substrates of 50% cassava peels and 50% corncobs whether supplemented or not.

3.2. Yield

The yield of mushrooms obtained from the two compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m) studied differed significantly (P < 0.05). Comparing the yield of mushrooms harvested from the two compost heights, higher yields were generally obtained from compost height 1.5 m and its interactions of composting periods the various substrates (Table 3(a)) than the 0.8 m compost height and its interactions (Table 3(b)). This trend suggests that the period of composting and the height for composting were insufficient to support microbial activity [20]. Also, the degree of decomposition in the compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m) with respect to nutrients available may account for the differences in the yield of mushrooms harvested [33].

Table 3.

Yield of mushrooms from interactions of compost height, composting period, substrates, and supplementation.

(a) −0.8 m compost height

Period (days) Substrate Flush Total B.E (%)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
3 cm 57 42 33 33 24 189a 27
ncm 49 46 38 30 19 182a 26
cmcc 59 50 45 34 31 219b 31.3
ncmcc 56 55 50 29 28 218b 31.1
5 cm 59 51 49 40 29 228c 32.6
ncm 45 42 31 27 23 168a 24
cmcc 61 55 52 33 31 232c 33
ncmcc 60 58 52 37 25 232c 33
7 cm 62 57 52 41 28 240c 34.3
ncm 53 39 39 32 20 183a 26.1
cmcc 64 60 57 38 22 241c 34.4
ncmcc 56 58 54 43 25 236c 33.7
Open in a new tab

Means with the same letters in a column are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Results are mean scores of 8.

(b) −1.5 m compost height

Period (days) Substrate Flush Total B.E (%)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
3 cm 48 46 45 37 19 195a 27.9
ncm 50 45 45 32 30 202a 28.8
cmcc 65 62 53 44 37 261b 37.3
ncmcc 66 59 57 51 24 257b 36.7
5 cm 59 51 35 31 26 202a 28.9
ncm 70 70 42 63 34 279c 39.9
cmcc 71 64 58 52 43 288c 41.1
ncmcc 71 72 59 50 45 297d 42.4
7 cm 63 53 40 37 30 223a 31.9
ncm 68 60 55 53 39 275c 39.3
cmcc 74 64 60 58 43 299d 42.7
ncmcc 71 67 57 49 44 288d 41.1
Open in a new tab

Means with the same letters in a column are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Results are mean scores of 8.

An interaction of 1.5 m compost height 5 days' composting period and a substrate mixture of cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) supplemented with chicken manure produced the highest yield of 299 g (Table 3(b)) and the lowest yield of 163 g (Table 3(a)) from ncm (100% cassava peels + no chicken manure), 0.8 m and 5 days composting period. Essentially, previous works done by Hudson [40] and Carlile and Watkinson [41] suggest that nutrient release during aerobic fermentation of composting is temperature dependent so higher compost heights (larger size) will result in higher temperatures, which, according to Vetayasuporn [42], support effective microorganisms to digest (mainly by lignocellulolytic enzymes) the substrate and subsequently release different sugars. Digestion of cellulose produces glucose and cellobiose, while digestion of hemicellulose produces mostly xylose and other sugars, such as galactose, mannose, arabinose, pyranose, glucuronic acid, and galacturonic acid as secondary products [43–45]. These are converted into sources of carbon which are easily utilized for growth of mycelia, primordial initiation, fruit body formation, and ultimately higher yields. There was a general inverse correlation of yield to flush number increase (Tables 3(a) and 3(b)). This could be attributed to depletion of nutrients in the substrate and accumulation of some metabolites which inhibited growth [1]. Yields obtained in this study were lower than results reported by some researchers [35, 46]. However yields were within range of results reported by [47].

3.3. Physical Characteristics

The cap diameter and stipe lengths of P. ostreatus grown on different substrate mixtures differed significantly (P < 0.05) as a result of probable presence of little or complete lack of some vital nutrients, especially nitrogen, needed for P. ostreatus growth in cassava peel. Comparatively smaller sizes were recorded for 0.8 m compost height, composting period, and substrate interactions. The ranges of cap diameter and stipe lengths were 6.5–3.6 cm and 5.5–1.8 cm, respectively (Table 10).

Table 10.

Effect of compost height, composting period, and substrate interactions on the physical characteristics of Pleurotus ostreatus.

Time 0.8 m compost height 1.5 m compost height
Substrate Cap diameter Stipe length Cap diameter Stipe length
3 days cm 5.5b 5.5c 5.0a 4.1a
ncm 3.6a 1.8a 5.1a 4.2a
cmcc 5.5b 3.0b 5.4b 4.0a
ncmcc 4.3a 3.4b 5.7c 5.2c
5 days cm 5.6b 3.3b 5.6c 5.0b
ncm 3.7a 1.8a 6.1c 5.1c
cmcc 4.4a 3.0b 7.0d 5.0b
ncmcc 5.6b 3.3b 6.1c 5.2c
7 days cm 6.1c 4.0b 5.9c 4.9b
ncm 4.0a 3.4b 6.0c 5.0b
cmcc 6.5c 5.0c 6.6d 5.0b
ncmcc 6.4c 5.2c 6.3c 5.1c
Open in a new tab

Means with the same letters in a column are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

Results are mean scores of 8.

On the other hand, bigger sizes were recorded for 1.5 m compost height, composting periods, and substrate mixture interactions. They were in the ranges 7–5 cm and 5.2–4.1 cm for cap diameter and stipe lengths, respectively (Table 10). Nitrogen and carbon are two essential elements required for cellular functions for growth and various metabolic activities, particularly protein and enzymes synthesis [43]. Carbon is readily available from cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin from the substrates, but nitrogen occurs mainly in a bound form and is not available until it is enzymatically released. Absence or limited supply of any of these elements may result in poor physical growth.

Raymond et al. [47] reported that the yield of Pleurotus mushroom could be boosted by the addition of nitrogenous supplements. The ranges were in agreement with [11, 48–50]. Analysis of cap diameters and stipe lengths revealed significant differences (P < 0.05) between the two compost heights.

3.4. Nutritional Content

The various interactions of compost heights, composting periods, substrates, and environmental conditions resulted in significantly different (P < 0.05) nutritional compositions of mushrooms from this experiment.

The moisture content of the samples ranged from 83.3 to 85.6% (Table 4) within the category of high moisture foods, thus making them highly perishable [51]. High moisture contents promote susceptibility to microbial growth and enzyme activity [51]. Works of researchers [52, 53] reported comparable values of 84-85%.

Table 4.

Average moisture content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type 0.8 M 1.5 M
Composting period Composting period
3 days 5 days 7 days 3 days 5 days 7 days
CM 84.63 ± 0.01 84.57 ± 0.02 84.51 ± 0.02 85.48 ± 0.01 84.27 ± 0.03 84.11 ± 0.02
NCM 84.78 ± 0.03 84.83 ± 0.02 84.58 ± 0.01 84.63 ± 0.02 84.71 ± 0.01 84.63 ± 0.01
NCMCC 83.64 ± 0.02 84.39 ± 0.01 83.72 ± 0.01 84.37 ± 0.02 83.42 ± 0.02 83.33 ± 0.02
CMCC 84.80 ± 0.01 85.72 ± 0.02 84.58 ± 0.03 83.44 ± 0.01 84.51 ± 0.02 85.60 ± 0.03
Open in a new tab

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

The ash content ranged from 7.32 to 7.83% (Table 5). The differences in ash content for respective samples grown on different substrate formulations were not significant (P > 0.05). Ash content of foods represents their mineral element composition. Mushrooms are good bioaccumulators of mineral elements and that is evident in their medicinal attributes. Some mineral elements are needed in the body for the formation of red blood cells, formation of strong teeth and bones, and so forth [54].

Table 5.

Average ash content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate
type		 0.8 M 1.5 M
Composting period Composting period
3 days 5 days 7 days 3 days 5 days 7 days
cm 7.61 ± 0.1 7.83 ± 0.1 7.81 ± 0.3 7.48 ± 0.2 7.59 ± 0.2 7.64 ± 0.1
ncm 7.49 ± 0.2 7.47 ± 0.2 7.52 ± 0.2 7.61 ± 0.1 7.71 ± 0.2 7.69 ± 0.2
ncmcc 7.32 ± 0.1 7.41 ± 0.1 7.65 ± 0.3 7.70 ± 0.1 7.63 ± 0.3 7.82 ± 0.2
cmcc 7.55 ± 0.1 7.49 ± 0.3 7.60 ± 0.1 7.67 ± 0.2 7.34 ± 0.1 7.65 ± 0.1
Open in a new tab

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

These values were slightly higher than works of [54, 55] but were however lower than work of Aida et al. [56]. There were appreciable quantities of fiber in the mushroom samples examined. As shown in Table 6, the fibre content of the mushrooms ranged from 8.39 to 8.88%. This observation agrees with works of researchers [10, 57] who recorded similar values. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the values obtained for mushrooms cultivated under the various conditions. Fungi derived β-glucans are notable for their ability to modulate the immune system [10, 58]. The values obtained under various growing conditions for fat were in the range of 2.14–2.22% (Table 7). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05). This range of fat content is lower than that of earlier report of Jaworska et al. [59] and much depends on the nature of substrate. However, lower values were obtained by Aida et al. [56].

Table 6.

Average fibre content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type Compost height
0.8 M 1.5 M
Composting period Composting period
3 days 5 days 7 days 3 days 5 days 7 days
cm 8.42 ± 0.14 8.47 ± 014 8.39 ± 0.13 8.72 ± 0.14 8.48 ± 0.14 8.69 ± 0.14
ncm 8.47 ± 0.13 8.69 ± 0.13 8.57 ± 0.15 8.68 ± 0.14 8.75 ± 0.14 8.88 ± 0.15
ncmcc 8.56 ± 0.15 8.77 ± 0.14 8.79 ± 0.14 8.80 ± 0.13 8.78 ± 0.14 8.74 ± 0.13
cmcc 8.73 ± 0.14 8.74 ± 0.14 8.86 ± 0.15 8.80 ± 0.13 8.81 ± 0.13 8.79 ± 0.14
Open in a new tab

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Table 7.

Average fat content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type Compost height
0.8 M 1.5 M
Composting period Composting period
3 days 5 days 7 days 3 days 5 days 7 days
CM 2.16 ± 0.13 2.17 ± 0.14 2.17 ± 0.12 2.15 ± 0.13 2.16 ± 0.14 2.16 ± 0.14
NCM 2.14 ± 0.13 2.18 ± 0.13 2.20 ± 0.11 2.18 ± 0.12 2.17 ± 0.13 2.18 ± 0.13
NCMCC 2.17 ± 0.14 2.17 ± 0.13 2.16 ± 0.13 2.17 ± 0.14 2.19 ± 0.13 2.16 ± 0.14
CMCC 2.24 ± 0.12 2.19 ± 0.14 2.22 ± 0.12 2.18 ± 0.14 2.18 ± 0.14 2.15 ± 0.13
Open in a new tab

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Protein contents ranged from 10.48 to 10.80% (Table 8). They differed significantly (P < 0.05) with regard to the various interactions. Jaworska et al. [59] reported that not only the protein content of the substrate but also nature of protein in the substrate influences the protein content of the fruiting bodies. Values obtained were within range of works [52, 56] but lower than works of [10, 55, 57, 60, 61]. The carbohydrate values fell within the range of 73.3–74.5% (Table 9). They differed significantly (P < 0.05). The values obtained were higher than previous works [31, 32, 52] which recorded 65.8–66.8% values for total carbohydrate content in different Pleurotus species.

Table 8.

Average protein content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type Compost height
0.8 M 1.5 M
Composting period Composting period
3 days 5 days 7 days 3 days 5 days 7 days
CM 10.65 ± 0.13 10.60 ± 0.14 10.72 ± 0.12 10.62 ± 0.13 10.53 ± 0.14 10.69 ± 0.14
NCM 10.58 ± 0.13 10.54 ± 0.13 10.61 ± 0.14 10.68 ± 0.14 10.71 ± 0.12 10.48 ± 0.14
NCMCC 10.73 ± 0.12 10.78 ± 0.14 10.66 ± 0.13 10.57 ± 0.13 10.83 ± 0.13 10.66 ± 0.13
CMCC 10.64 ± 0.14 10.49 ± 0.12 10.78 ± 0.13 10.64 ± 0.14 10.80 ± 0.14 10.53 ± 0.13
Open in a new tab

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Table 9.

Average carbohydrate content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type Compost height
0.8 M 1.5 M
Composting period Composting period
3 days 5 days 7 days 3 days 5 days 7 days
CM 74.61 ± 0.13 74.49 ± 0.14 74.68 ± 0.13 74.52 ± 0.12 74.61 ± 0.14 74.58 ± 0.13
NCM 74.80 ± 0.14 74.46 ± 0.12 73.55 ± 0.13 74.64 ± 0.14 73.34 ± 0.13 73.07 ± 0.13
NCMCC 73.64 ± 0.13 74.50 ± 0.13 74.80 ± 0.12 74.14 ± 013 74.72 ± 0.13 73.98 ± 0.12
CMCC 72.19 ± 0.13 73.88 ± 0.13 73.92 ± 0.14 74.51 ± 0.13 74.77 ± 0.14 74.80 ± 0.13
Open in a new tab

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

4. Conclusion

This study found out that compost size is directly related to the degree of decomposition which in turn accounts for nutrient release for growth of mushrooms. The overall best yield (299 g) was produced by the interaction of 1.5 m compost height, 5 days' composting period, and substrate mixture of cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) supplemented with chicken manure. It can therefore be concluded that greater compost heights give optimum yields and good physical attributes and nutrient quality.

Acknowledgment

The authors’ special gratitude goes to the laboratory staff at the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, KNUST, for their immense technical assistance during the work.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Upadhyay R. C., Verma R. N., Singh S. K., Yadav M. C. Effect of organic nitrogen supplementation on Pleurotus species . In: Sanchez, et al., editors. Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products. UAEM; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Przybylowicz P., Donoghue J. Shiitake Growers Handbook: The Art and Science of Mushroom Cultivation. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levanon D., Rothschild N., Danai O., Masaphy S. Bulk treatment of substrate for the cultivation of Shiitake mushrooms (Lentinus edodes) on straw. Bioresource Technology. 1993;45(1):63–64. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(93)90145-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bisko N. A., Bilay V. T. Some physiological aspects of the cultivation of Lentinula edodes (Berk.) Sing. In: Royse D. J., editor. Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products. Pennsylvania State University; 1996. pp. 381–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Philippoussis A., Diamantopoulou P., Zervakis G., Euthimiadou H. The composition and the porosity of lignocellulosic substrates influence mycelium growth and respiration rates of Lentinula edodes . International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2001;3(2):198–201. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adebayo G. J., Omolara B. N., Toyin A. E. Evaluation of yield of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus pulmonarius) grown on cotton waste and cassava peel. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;8(2):215–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baig M. M., Syed A. A., Kadam J. A., Mane V. P., Patil S. S. Biological efficiency and Nutritional contents of Pleurotus florida (Mont.) Singer cultivated on different agro-wastes. Nature and Science. 2009;7(1):154–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gbedemah C. M., Obodai M., Sawyerr L. C. Preliminary investigations into the bioconversion of gamma irradiated agricultural waste by Pleurotus spp. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 1998;52(1–6):379–382. doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(98)00030-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frimpong-Manso J., Obodai M., Dzomeku M., Apertorgbor M. M. Influence of rice husk on biological efficiency and nutrient content of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. Ex. Fr.) Kummer. International Food Research Journal. 2011;18(1):249–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kalač P. Chemical composition and nutritional value of European species of wild growing mushrooms: a review. Food Chemistry. 2009;113(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kortei J. N. K. Determination of optimal growth and yield parameters of Pleurotus ostreatus grown on composted cassava peel based formulations [Msc. thesis] Kumasi, Ghana: Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kortei J. N. K. Growing Oyster Mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) on Composted Agrowastes: An Efficient Way of Utilizing Lignocellulosic Materials. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferreira I. C. F. R., Vaz J. A., Vasconcelos M. H., Martins A. Compounds from wild mushrooms with antitumor potential. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;10(5):424–436. doi: 10.2174/1871520611009050424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferreira I. C. F. R., Barros L., Abreu R. M. V. Antioxidants in wild mushrooms. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2009;16(12):1543–1560. doi: 10.2174/092986709787909587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh V. K., Patel Y., Naraian R. Medicinal properties of Pleurotus species (oyster mushroom): a review. World Journal of Fungal and Plant Biology. 2012;3(1):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beffa T. The Composting Biotechnology: A Microbial Aerobic. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McKinley V. L., Vestal J. R. Biokinetic analyses of adaptation and succession: microbial activity in composting municipal sewage sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1984;47(5):933–941. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.5.933-941.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zucconi F., de Bertoldi M. Compost specifications for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid waste. In: de Bertoldi M., Ferranti M. P., L'Hermite P., Zucconi F., editors. Compost: Production, Quality and Use. London, UK: Elsevier Applied Science; 1987. pp. 30–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen Y., Inbar U. Chemical and spectroscopical analyses of organic matter transformation during composting in relation to compost maturity. In: Hoitink H. A. J., Keener H. M., editors. Science and Engineering of Composting. Worthington, Ohio, USA: 1993. pp. 550–600. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boulter J. I., Boland G. J., Trevors J. T. Compost: a study of the development process and end-product potential for suppression of turfgrass disease. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2000;16(2):115–134. doi: 10.1023/A:1008901420646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.FAOSTAT . Food and Agricultural Commodities Production. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Statistics Database; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.FAO/IFAD . The World Cassava Economy; Facts, Trends and Outlooks. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Fund for Agricultural Development; [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lebot V. Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Cassava, Sweet Potato, Yam and Aroids. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McKey D., Cavagnaro T. R., Cliff J., Gleadow R. Chemical ecology in coupled human and natural systems: people, manioc, multitrophic interactions and global change. Chemoecology. 2010;20(2):109–133. doi: 10.1007/s00049-010-0047-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burns A., Gleadow R., Cliff J., Zacarias A., Cavagnaro T. Cassava: the drought, war and famine crop in a changing world. Sustainability. 2010;2(11):3572–3607. doi: 10.3390/su2113572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.FAO Food and agricultural commodities production. June 2012, http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.
  • 27.FAOSTAT . Food and Agricultural Commodities Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Database; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baah J., Tait R. M., Tuah A. K. Selecting browse plants to supplement cassava peel-based diet for peri-urban small ruminants. Small Ruminant Research. 2011;96(1):36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Youri M. R. Formulation of media for the production of Pleurotus ostreatus using agro-processing waste [M.S. thesis] Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Buswell J. A. Potential of spent mushroom substrate for bioremediation purposes. Compost Science and Utilization. 1994;2(3):31–35. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.1994.10757931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.NRAES . Poultry Waste Management Handbook (NRAES-132) Ithaca, NY, USA: Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Cooperative Extension; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dundar A., Acay H., Yildiz A. The effect of using lignocellulosic wastes for cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm. on mushroom yield, chemical composition and nutritional value. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;8(4):662–666. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hubbe M. A., Nazhad M., Sánchez C. Composting as a way to convert cellulosic biomass and organic waste into high-value soil amendments: a review. BioResources. 2010;5(4):2808–2854. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oei P. Manual on Mushroom Cultivation-Techniques, Species and Opportunities for Commercial Application in Developing Countries. Wageningen, The Netherlands: CTA; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Obodai M., Vowortor K. A. Performance of different strains of Pleurotus spp. under Ghanaian conditions. The Journal of Food Technology in Africa. 2002;7(3):98–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.AOAC . Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th. Gaithersburg, Md, USA: AOAC International; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chang S. T., Miles P. G. Edible Mushrooms and Their Cultivation. London, UK: Academic Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Akinyele B. J., Adetuyi F. C. Effect of agrowastes, pH and temperature variation on the growth of Volvariella volvacea . African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005;4(12):1390–1395. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mantovani T. R., Linde G. A., Colauto N. B. Effect of the addition of nitrogen sources to cassava fibre and carbon to nitrogen ratios on Agaricus brasiliensis growth. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2007;53(1):139–143. doi: 10.1139/w06-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hudson H. J. Fungal Biology. London, UK: Edward Arnold; 1986. Fungi as inhabitants of extreme environments; pp. 298–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carlile M. J., Watkinson S. C. The Fungi. London, UK: Academic Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vetayasuporn S. Oyster mushroom cultivation on different cellulosic substrates. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2006;2(6):548–551. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Albersheim P. The primary cell wall. In: Bonner J., Varner J. E., editors. Plant Biochemistry. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 1976. pp. 225–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Keller B. Structural cell wall proteins. Plant Physiology. 1993;101(4):1127–1130. doi: 10.1104/pp.101.4.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Clarke A. J. Biodegradation of Cellulose: Enzymology and Biotechnology. Lancaster, Pa, USA: Technomic; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zadrazil I. F. Conversion of lignocellulosics into animal feed with white rot fungi. In: Chang S. T., Buswell J. A., Siu-wai C., editors. Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products. Hong Kong, China: Chinese University Press; 1993. pp. 298–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Raymond P., Mshandete A., MKivaisi A. K. Cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus HK-37) on solid sisal waste fractions supplemented with cow dung manure. Journal of Biology and Life Science. 2013;4(1):273–286. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mshandete A. M. Cultivation of Pleurotus HK-37 and Pleurotus sapidus (oyster mushrooms) on cattail weed (Typha domingensis) substrate in Tanzania. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2011;1(3):35–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Owusu-Boateng G., Dzogbefia V. Establishing some parameters for the cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) on cocoa husk. Journal of the Ghana Science Association. 2005;7(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Adejumo T. O., Awosanya O. B. Proximate and mineral composition of four edible mushroom species from South Western Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005;4(10):1084–1088. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Owusu-Boateng G. Studies on scale-up process for the cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) on cocoa husk [Msc. Thesis] Kumasi, Ghana: Department of Biochemistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aletor V. A. Compositional studies on edible tropical species of mushrooms. Food Chemistry. 1995;54(3):265–268. doi: 10.1016/0308-8146(95)00044-J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bonatti M., Karnopp P., Soares H. M., Furlan S. A. Evaluation of Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus sajor-caju nutritional characteristics when cultivated in different lignocellulosic wastes. Food Chemistry. 2004;88(3):425–428. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Baig M. M. V., Patil S. S., Ahmed S. A., Telang S. M. The nutritional value of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.Fr) Kum cultivated on different lignocellulosic agrowastes. Innovative Romanian Food Biotechnology. 2010;7:66–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Akyüz M., Kirbag S. Nutritive value of wild edible and cultured mushrooms. Turkish Journal of Biology. 2010;34(1):97–102. doi: 10.3906/biy-0805-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Aida F. M. N. A., Shuhaimi M., Yazid M., Maaruf A. G. Mushroom as a potential source of prebiotics: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2009;20(11-12):567–575. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2009.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rosli W. I. W., Aishah M. S. Effect of different drying techniques on the nutritional values of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus sajor-caju) Sains Malaysiana. 2013;42(7):937–941. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang D., Sakoda A., Suzuki M. Biological efficiency and nutritional value of Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on spent beer grain. Bioresource Technology. 2001;78(3):293–300. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jaworska G., Bernas E., Mickowska B. Effects of production process on the amino acid content of frozen and canned Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom. Food Chemistry. 2011;125(3):936–943. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Akindahunsi A. A., Oyetayo F. L. Nutrient and antinutrient distribution of edible mushroom, Pleurotus tuber-regium (fries) singer. LWT: Food Science and Technology. 2006;39(5):548–553. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Owen O. J., Ngodigha E. M., Amakiri A. O. Proximate composition of heat treated poultry litter (layers) International Journal of Poultry Science. 2008;7(11):1033–1035. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2008.1033.1035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biotechnology Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES