Skip to main content
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences
. 2014 Autumn;5(4):163–170.

Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on Proliferation and Differentiation of the Cells Contributing in Bone Regeneration

Reza Amid 1, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh 2, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie 3, Arian Hakakzadeh 3
PMCID: PMC4281990  PMID: 25653816

Abstract

Introduction: Low level laser therapy (LLLT) also known as photobiomodulation, is a treatment that uses low-level lasers or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to change cellular function and is a clinically well accepted tool in regenerative medicine and dentistry. Considering the variety of laser, exposure, cells and study types, the exact effects of low level laser therapy seems to be unclear. The aim of this study was to review the data published in the field of the effects of low level laser therapy on proliferation and differentiation of the cells contributing in bone regeneration.

Methods: To access relevant articles, an electronic search in PubMed was conducted from 2001 to April 2014. English language published papers on low level laser therapy were found using the selected keywords .The full texts of potentially suitable articles were obtained for final assessment according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria.

Results: 240 articles were found from 2001 to April 2014. Following the initial screening of titles and abstracts as well as the final screening of full texts, 22 articles completely fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this study. Wavelength used in LLLT irradiation varied between 600 to 1000 nm with an energy density of 0.04–60J/cm2 . Although almost all studies agreed on getting positive effects from LLLT, some had opposing results.

Conclusion: Low level laser with low-energy density range appears to exert a biostimulatory effect on bone tissue, enhance osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation on cell lines used in in vitro studies. Despite the fact that many researches have been recently done on the effects of LLLT on different cell lines, without knowing the precise mechanism and effects, we are not able to offer a clinical treatment protocol. This paper is a beginning to help further progress and extend practical use of LLLT in future.

Keywords: low-level laser therapies, cell line, bone regenerations

Introduction

Laser dentistry has developed in two different fields: laser surgery and therapy. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) for improving tissue healing and regeneration is also known as photobiomodulation. LLLT is a treatment that uses low-level lasers or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to change cellular function and is a clinically well accepted tool in regenerative medicine and dentistry to improve healing processes and management of functional disorders 1 . Laser therapy gives us a better inflammatory response by reducing edema and pain 2 . It has been reported that Low-level lasers exert biostimulatory effects on various cell types, including osteogenic cells and bone tissue3,4 . Enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity and improved osteocalcin gene expression are other effects of Low Level laser therapy 5 . While injected chemicals and some other medicaments have the problem of systemic side effects, lasers carry the advantage of not having much unwanted impacts on the patients’ health status 6 . However, some researchers suggest further studies to clarify the exact action mechanisms of laser 1,5 .

Although diode lasers are being frequently used for dental treatments, different types of laser, such as He-Ne, argon have been successfully used for various cell activation. Also each kind of Laser therapy has its own wavelength, power density, energy density, type of exposure and treatment duration7 .

Many in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated the positive effects of LLLT on tissues. LLLT enhances the survival of Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) and stimulates the secretion of growth factors in the wound bed 8 . Fernandes et al. in a clinical research used LLLT during the initial phase of bone healing in a model of bone defect in rats. The results indicated a higher inflammatory cells recruitment and a better tissue organization at the site of the injury, with the presence of granulation tissue and new bone formation9 . Improved opening of the mid-palatal suture and accelerated bone regeneration are other clinical effects of low-level lasers in rapid maxillary expansion process10 . LLLT also stimulates repair process of the radiation-related damages in alveolar bones11 , and can enhance mineralization in sockets12

The precise mechanism of LLLT has not been completely explained, while several in vitro studies have shown that LLLT has stimulating effects on osteoblast-like cells and accelerates the repair process of the bone3,13 . Other study reported delayed fracture healing or no effects after low level laser irradiation5 . Bloise et al. used diode laser (659 nm) on human osteoblast-like cell line (Saos-2),which resulted in enhanced proliferation and differentiation14 . Same results were shown in the study carried out by Stein et al. using a helium-neon (He-Ne) laser (632 nm) on human osteoblast cell line which also promoted cell proliferation and maturation of human osteoblasts4 . However, Bouvet-Gerbettaz et al. used a diode Laser (808 nm) to assess bone cell proliferation as well as osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation on murine bone marrow cells and found no significant change between the control (non-radiated) and LLLT groups 15 . On the other hand, in another study, a single exposure of 830 nm Diode on osteoblastic (MC3T3) cell line resulted in a reduction in cell growth compared to non-irradiated controls5 .

Despite the fact that many researches have been recently done on the effects of LLLT on different cell lines, without knowing the precise mechanism and effects, we are not able to offer a clinical treatment protocol. This study was designed to review articles, trying to develop primary understanding about functions and effects of LLLT on different tissues. This paper is a beginning to help further progress and extend practical use of LLLT in future.

Methods

Search strategy

To access relevant articles, an electronic search in PubMed was conducted from 2001 to April 2014. English language published papers on low level laser therapy were found using the following keywords alone or ensemble: low-level laser therapy, cell line, stem cell differentiation and bone regeneration. Initial paper selection was performed by examining titles and abstracts of all selected papers. The full texts of potentially suitable articles were obtained for final assessment according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria.

Study selection:

All in vivo and in vitro studies applying LLLT on defined cell lines by using outlined assessment tests and reaching clear results were included. Different types of low-level laser with different types of irradiation were also included in this study.

Results

240 articles were found from 2001 to April 2014. Following the initial screening of titles and abstracts and final screening of full texts, 22 articles completely fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this study. All data were calculated in a table for better analyzing and comparing the studies which have used a specific type of cell line. (Table 1)

Table 1 . Review of published data in using the effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on proliferation and differentiation of the cells contributing in bone regeneration.

No Author & year Type of LLLT Type of irradiation Type of cells Criteria Assessment Tests/Assay Conclusion
1 Huertas et al.2014 3 Diode(940 nm) Pulsed radiation
Energy outputs : 1-5 J
Intensities: 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 W/cm2
MG-63 cell Cell proliferation MTT assay Pulsed low-level laser with low-energy density range appears to exert a biostimulatory effect on bone tissue.
2 Migliario et al.2014 13 Diode(980nm) Continuous mode
Energy outputs: 1-50 J
Intensities: 1.57, 7.87, 15.74, 39.37 and 78.75 J/cm2
Murine pre-osteoblasts MC3T3 cells Cell proliferation Manual cell count LLLT may be a useful tool for bone regeneration therapy.
3 Choi et al.2013 17 He-Ne ( 632.8 nm) Continuous mode
Energy out puts:
17.0 mW
Intensities:
0, 1 and 3 J/cm2
Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC) Osteogenic potential -Histological and immunofluorescence assessment
-Three-dimensional micro-computed tomography
-Western blot analysis
LLLT enhanced the proliferation and the survival of ASCs at 14 days
ASC-seeded grafts promote bone regeneration, and the application of LLLT on ASC-seeded ADM results in rapid bone formation.
4 Bloise et al.2013 14 Diode (659 nm) Single transverse- mode
Energy out puts:
10 mW
Intensities:
1 , 3 J/cm2
Human osteoblast-like cell line (Saos-2 cell line) 1.Proliferation 2.Differantiation -Calcium deposition
-Alkaline phosphatase activity
LLLT is a helpful application for bone tissue regeneration.
5 Jawad et al.2013 20 Diode (940 nm) Continuous mode
Energy out puts:
100,200,300mw
Human fetal osteoblast cell line 1.Proliferation
2.Differantiation
-MTT assay.
-Alkaline phosphatase
-Osteocalcin activity assays.
LLLT may play an important role in stimulating osteoblast cells for improved bone formation.
6 Wu et al.2013 23 Diode ( 660 nm)
Energy out puts: 15 -17  mW⋅cm−2 , Intensities:
1, 2 and 4 J/cm2
Human PDL (hPDL) cells 1.Proliferation
2.Differantiation
3. Osteogenic marker gene expression
4.Cytotoxicity
-MTT assay
-Alizarin Red S staining
-Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity.
-Osteogenic marker gene expression:
RT-PCR
-Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage measurement
Potential use of LPLI in clinical applications for periodontal tissue regeneration.
7 Pyo et al.2013 21 Diode (808 nm) Continuous mode
Energy out puts:
1000 mW
Intensities:
1.2, 2.4 and 3.6 J/cm2
Hypoxic-cultured Human fetal osteoblast cells (cell line 1.19) 1.Cell viability 2.Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1s (HIF-1s), bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2), osteocalcin, type I collagen, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), and Akt -MTT assay
-Western blot assay
-Quantitative reverse transcriptional assay
LLLT induces the expression of BMP-2, osteocalcin, and TGF- β1 in 1 % hypoxic-cultured human osteoblasts.
8 Aleksic et al. 2010 25 Er:YAG laser(2.94nm) Pulsed radiation Energy out puts:
30–350 mJ
Intensities:
0.7– 17.2J/cm2
Mouse-derived osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1 1. Cell proliferation
2.Cell death
3.Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways
- Lactate dehydrogenase measurement
-Western blot
Er:YAG laser may be able to promote bone healing following periodontal and peri implant therapy.
9 Renno et al.2010 5 Diode (830 nm) Single exposure
Energy out puts : 30mW
Intensities:
10 J/cm2
Osteoblastic (MC3T3) cell line 1.Proliferation 2.Cell growth - CellTiter 96Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay Reduction in cell proliferation compared to non-irradiated controls.
10 Stein et al .2008 22 9Diode (670-nm) Continuous mode
Energy outputs : 400 mW
Intensities:
1 or 2 J/cm2
Human osteosarcoma cell line SaOS-2 1.Total cellular protein synthesis
2.Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-specific activity
3. attached cell viability
-Micro BCA™ protein assay
-Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-specific activity:colorimetric end-point assay
-Metabolic XTT-Assay
Combined treatment with phenothiazine chloride and LLLT does not result in a synergistic enhancement of the biostimulatory effect of LLLT. No evidence for antagonizing effects on growth and,differentiation of human osteoblasts.
11 Bouvet-Gerbettaz et al.
2009 15
Diode (808 nm) Continuous mode
Intensities:
4 J/cm2
Murine bone marrow cells 1. Bone cell proliferation, 2.Osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation -Specific staining and microscopic analysis of the culture
-Quantitative RT-PCR
LLLT does not alter murine bone progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation.
12 Renno et al.2007 26 (670-nm, 780-nm, and 830-nm) Single exposure
Energy outputs:
10 mW
Intensities:
0.5, 1, 5, and 10 J/cm2 .
Neonatal, murine, calvarial, osteoblastic (MC3T3) and Human osteosarcoma (MG63) cell lines 1.Cell proliferation
2.Alkaline phosphatase activity
-Cell proliferation assay
-Alkaline phosphatase assays (EnzoLyteTM pNPP Alkaline Phosphatase Assay (Colorimetric) Kit)
Each cell line responds differently to specific wavelength and dose combinations.
13 Martinasso et al .2007 27 Superpulsed low-level laser therapy (SLLLT) Superpulsed radiation
Energy outputs: 60 J
Human osteoblast-like cells MG-63. 1.Cell proliferation 2. Markers of osteoblast activity -Osteocalcin measurement
-Alkaline phosphatase measurement
-Real time PCR.
Repeated SLLLT irradiation stimulates cell proliferation in human osteoblast-like cells and, importantly, increases the expression of proteins essential for bone formation.
14 Aihara et al.2006 16 Diode laser (810 nm) Continuous mode
Energy outputs: 50 mW
Intensities: 9.33, 27.99, 55.98, or 93.30 J/cm2 ,
Rat osteoclast precursor cells Formation of osteoclast-like cell -Immunohistochemical staining
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
-Pit formation assay
Low-energy laser irradiation facilitates differentiation and activation of osteoclasts via RANK expression.
15 Stein et al.2005 4 He-Ne laser
(632 nm)
energy output:
10mW
Intensities:
0.43 J/cm2
Human osteoblast cell line 1.Cell proliferation
2.Differantiation
-MTT assay
- Histochemical staining of ALP
- Immunohistochemistry
LLLT promotes proliferation and maturation of human osteoblasts in vitro.
16 Hamajima et al.200319 Diode (830 nm) Continuous mode
Energy output:
500 mW
Intensities:
7.64 J/cm2 ,
Mouse calvaria-derived osteoblastic cell line, MC3T3-E1 Bone formation -Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method
-Real-time PCR method
Increased expression of the osteoglycin gene by LLLI in the early proliferation stage of cultured osteoblastic cells may play an important role in the stimulation of bone formation in concert with matrix proteins and growth factors.
17 Coombe et al. 200118 Diode (830 nm) Single radiation
Energy output 90 mW
Intensities: 1.7 to 25.1 J/cm2
Human osteosarcoma cell line, SAOS-2 1.Cell viability
2.Proliferation
-Alkaline phosphatase activity
-Intracellular calcium concentration
The heat shock response and increased intracellular calcium indicate that the cells do respond to low level laser irradiation.

Among both in vitro and in vivo studies, diode laser was the most frequently used laser. 18 studies used diode laser 3-5,9,12-24 . 2 studies used He-Ne laser 4,17 and 1 study used Er:YAG (Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ) laser in their experiments25 . One study didn’t clarify its type of laser.26 Only 1 study used Superpulsed low-level laser therapy (SLLLT)27 . Laser wavelength was different between the selected studies and varied from 632 to 980 nm. In one study, laser wavelength was not clarified.12

Different types of irradiation were applied in the studies selected, such as: single, pulsed, superpulsed exposure and continuous mode. Also each type of study had its specific energy density and power output. Different types of cell lines were used in studies such as: Human osteoblastic-like and osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2), Human periodontal ligament (PDL )cells, Human osteoblast-like cells MG-63,Osteoblastic MC3T3 cell line, Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell, Mouse calvaria derived osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1,Murine bone marrow cells and Murine preosteoblastic MC3T3 cells. In vivo studies were mainly done on animals.

The most common criteria assessed in almost all the studies were cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Osteogenic genes expression, cytotoxicity, expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1s (HIF-1s), bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2), osteocalcin, type I collagen and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) were other important criteria among the studies. The most common assessment tests among the studies were: the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, alkaline phosphatase assays, Western blot analysis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR method.

In general, almost all the studies resulted in having positive effects while using low-level lasers in comparison to the control group (non-irradiated). In 2007, a study was conducted using super pulsed low level laser therapy on human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells to assess cell proliferation and markers of osteoblast activity27 . The results showed increased number of cells and greater osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase especially after 3 days of treatment. Seven years later, Huertas et al. did an in vitro study using diode laser on cultured MG-63 cell to assess their proliferation by MMT test which showed increased cell proliferation at intensities of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 W/cm2 versus controls. They also concluded that low energy density variation positively correlated with cell growth3 . In two of the selected articles, diode laser was used to see its effect on human osteosarcoma cell line SAOA-2 to see its effects on cell viability through alkaline phosphatase activity18,22 . In the experience performed by Stein et al. a 670 nm nonthermal diode laser unit was used with an output of 400mW and energy density of 1 or 2 J/cm2 in continuous mode4 . Their outcomes demonstrated an increase in cell viability and ALP-specific activity with a laser dose of 1J/cm2 and lower levels of ALP-specific with 2J/cm2 dose 22 . On the contrary, different results were obtained in the study of Coombe et al18 . In their study, a diode laser with 830 nm was used with an output of almost 4.5 times less than the previous study and energy densities of 0.3, 0.5,1 and 2 joules. The results came out as: no changes in cell viability, proliferation or activation and also no significant early or late effects on protein expression and alkaline phosphatase activity18 . Same results were observed in the study carried out by Bouvet-Gerbettaz et al in 2009 to see the effects of continuous irradiation of diode laser (808nm) on Murine bone marrow cells using a specific staining and microscopic analysis of the cultures after various times and quantitative RT-PCR15 .The results were similar proliferation response of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as well as osteoclast or osteoblast differentiation of the corresponding progenitors between control and LLLT conditions.

In 2006, Aihara et al. used a diode laser on rat osteoclast precursor cells to see the formation of osteoclast-like cells, which resulted in an increased number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase positive multinucleate cells by approximately 1.3-fold in the 3- and 6-min irradiation groups and a faster appearance of osteoclasts in the laser irradiation groups 16 .

To analyze the effects of He-Ne laser on human osteoblast like cell, a study was done in 2005 which showed higher ALP activity and expression of osteopontin4 . In 2013, same type of laser and wavelength with a different power output was irradiated on an adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC)-seeded acellular dermal matrix (ADM) to analyze its osteogenic potency, which resulted in a faster bone regeneration in comparison to the control group17 .

One of the most frequent used cell line within the studies were MC3T3 cells, in which diode laser was irradiated , but apparently studies differed in their results5,13,19,25,26 . In 2007, Renno et al. used a Diode laser at three different wavelengths: 670-nm, 780-nm, and 830-nm with a single irradiation .The results were significant increase in osteoblast proliferation after 830-nm laser irradiation (at 10 J/cm2 ) but decrease after 780-nm laser irradiation (at 1, 5, and 10 J/cm2 )26 . In 2010, they did another research using a diode (830 nm) with a single exposure at 10 J/cm2 on osteoblastic (MC3T3) cell line (on bioscaffolds), which showed a 13% decrease in MC3T3 cell proliferation on glass-ceramic discs compared to control (non-irradiated) discs. It also resulted in a reduction in cell growth compared to non-irradiated controls5 . In another study in 2010, an Er:YAG laser was applied on the same cell line and showed that under a number of parameter combinations, high osteoblast proliferation was observed25 . In the study carried out by Wu et al. human PDL (hPDL) cells were exposed to GaAlAs laser with a wavelength of 660-nm to see its effect on proliferation, differentiation and osteogenic marker gene expression23 . The low level laser irradiation significantly promoted hPDL cell proliferation at days 3 and 5 and at energy doses of 2 and 4 J/cm2 showed potential osteogenic capacity, as it stimulated ALP activity, calcium deposition, and osteogenic gene expression23 .

Another effect of low-level laser irradiation is that it promotes the expression of BMP-2, osteocalcin, and TGF-β1 but has no effect on type I collagen expression in hypoxic-cultured osteoblast based on the research done by Pyo et al. in 2013 21 .

Discussion

Low level laser therapy as a clinically well accepted tool in regenerative medicine and dentistry improves healing processes and management of functional disorders 1 . Providing direct biostimulative light energy to cells is the main target of low level laser therapy. Laser energy results in stimulation of molecules of cells, while having no significant increase in tissue temperature 28 .

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as a simple and noninvasive technique, highly effective in different branches of regenerative medicine, has favorable results on a variety of pathological conditions, such as pain and inflammation reduction 13 , Chondral 29 and fibroblast proliferation 30 , collagen synthesis and nerve regeneration are other effects of LLLT 31,32 .

In order to see the effects of LLLT on osteoblast’s proliferation, differentiation and maturation, specific cell lines should be used such as: MC3T3, MG-63 and SAOS-2. To assess cell’s proliferation, (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) (MTT) assay is essential; also to see the effects of LLLT on cell differantiation alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin activity assays are two helpful tests.

Wave length used in LLLT irradiation varies between 600 to 1000 nm with an energy density of 0.04–60J/cm2 . Different laser light sources, like helium-neon and gallium-aluminium-arsenide (GaAlAs), are being frequently used in clinical studies such as: surgical treatments of oral lesions, uncovery of implants, bacteria reduction in root canals or periodontal pockets and dentine hypersensitivity reduction. Diode lasers are known to have a high penetration depth compared to other laser types 13,3 .

Although irradiation in laser therapy is local, it may have some systemic effects on other parts of the body, and since the exact mechanism of LLLT action is still unclear, we may not be aware of these effects. In 2011 Silva et al. indicated that LLLT is a powerful instrument to prevent oral mucositis in the patients who have undergone hematopoitic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) 33 . Another study showed that LLLT had systemic and skeletal muscle anti-inflamatory effects in rats with heart failure, due to reduced plasma IL-6, TNF-α levels 34 . LLLT can also reduce postoperative pain by activation of peripheral opioid receptors 35 .

Conclusion

Based on all the results and conclusions of reviewed articles, considering the variety of laser, exposure, cells and study types, exact effects of low level laser therapy seems to be unclear. Although almost all the studies agreed on getting positive effects from LLLT, some have opposing results. Low level laser with low-energy density range appears to exert a biostimulatory effect on bone tissue, enhance osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation on cell lines used in in vitro studies and therefore may be a useful tool for bone regeneration therapy. Opposing results such as no effect on osteoblastic proliferation and differantiation, or even a reduction in these two criteria, are also mentioned within the studies.

Please cite this article as follows:

Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M, Hakakzadeh A. Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on Proliferation and Differentiation of the Cells Contributing in Bone Regeneration. J Lasers Med Sci 2014;5(4):163-70

References

  • 1.Rochkind S, Rousso M, Nissan M, Villarreal M, Barr-Nea L, Rees DG. Systemic effects of low‐power laser irradiation on the peripheral and central nervous system, cutaneous wounds, and burns. Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9(2):174–82. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900090214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aggarwal H, Singh MP, Nahar P, Mathur H, Gv S. Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Treatment of Recurrent Aphthous Ulcers–A Sham Controlled, Split Mouth Follow Up Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):218–21. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7639.4064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huertas RM, De Luna-Bertos E, Ramos-Torrecillas J, Leyva FM, Ruiz C, García-Martínez O. Effect and Clinical Implications of the Low-Energy Diode Laser on Bone Cell Proliferation. Biol Res Nurs. 2013;16(2):191–6. doi: 10.1177/1099800413482695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stein A, Benayahu D, Maltz L, Oron U. Low-level laser irradiation promotes proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblasts in vitro. Photomed Laser Surgery. 2005;23(2):161–6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2005.23.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Renno A, McDonnell P, Crovace M, Zanotto ED, Laakso L. Effect of 830 nm laser phototherapy on osteoblasts grown in vitro on Biosilicate scaffolds. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28(1):131–3. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seifi M, Atri F, Yazdani MM. Effects of low-level laser therapy on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption after artificial socket preservation. Dent Res J. 2014;11(1):61–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Woodruff L, Bounkeo J, Brannon W, Dawes KS, Barham CD, Waddell DL. The efficacy of laser therapy in wound repair: a meta-analysis of the literature. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22(3):241–7. doi: 10.1089/1549541041438623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim H, Choi K, Kweon O-K, Kim WH. Enhanced wound healing effect of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with low-level laser therapy in athymic mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2012;68(3):149–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(1):60–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Piascik JR, Swift EJ, Thompson JY, Grego S, Stoner BR. Surface modification for enhanced silanation of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):1116–21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernandes KR, Ribeiro DA, Rodrigues NC, Tim C, Santos AA, Parizotto NA. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the expression of osteogenic genes related in the initial stages of bone defects in rats. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(3):038002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.3.038002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cepera F, Torres F, Scanavini M, Paranhos LR, Capelozza Filho L, Cardoso MA. Effect of a low-level laser on bone regeneration after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(4):444–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El-Maghraby EM, El-Rouby DH, Saafan AM. Assessment of the effect of low-energy diode laser irradiation on gamma irradiated rats’ mandibles. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(7):796–805. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Korany NS, Mehanni SS, Hakam HM, El-Maghraby EM. Evaluation of socket healing in irradiated rats after diode laser exposure (histological and morphometric studies) Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(7):884–91. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Migliario M, Pittarella P, Fanuli M, Rizzi M, Renò F. Laser-induced osteoblast proliferation is mediated by ROS production. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(4):1463–7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1556-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bloise N, Ceccarelli G, Minzioni P, Vercellino M1, Benedetti L4, De Angelis MG. Investigation of low-level laser therapy potentiality on proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells in the absence/presence of osteogenic factors. J Biomed Optics. 2013;18(12):128006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.128006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bouvet-Gerbettaz S, Merigo E, Rocca JP, Carle GF, Rochet N. Effects of low-level laser therapy on proliferation and differentiation of murine bone marrow cells into osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(4):291–7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Aihara N, Yamaguchi M, Kasai K. Low-energy irradiation stimulates formation of osteoclast-like cells via RANK expression in vitro. Lasers Med Sci. 2006;21(1):24–33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-005-0368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Choi K, Kang B, Kim H, Lee S, Bae S, Kweon OK. Low-level laser therapy promotes the osteogenic potential of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded on an acellular dermal matrix. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater. 2013;101(6):919–28. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coombe AR, Ho CT, Darendeliler MA, Hunter N, Philips JR, Chapple CC. The effects of low level laser irradiation on osteoblastic cells. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4(1):3–14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.040102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hamajima S, Hiratsuka K, Kiyama-Kishikawa M, Tagawa T, Kawahara M, Ohta M. Effect of low-level laser irradiation on osteoglycin gene expression in osteoblasts. Lasers Med Sci. 2003;18(2):78–82. doi: 10.1007/s10103-003-0255-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jawad M, Husein A, Azlina A, Alam MK, Hassan R, Shaari R. Effect of 940 nm low-level laser therapy on osteogenesis in vitro. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(12):128001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.128001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pyo SJ, Song WW, Kim IR, Park BS, Kim CH, Shin SH. Low-level laser therapy induces the expressions of BMP-2, osteocalcin, and TGF-β1 in hypoxic-cultured human osteoblasts. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(2):543–50. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stein E, Koehn J, Sutter W, Wendtlandt G, Wanschitz F, Thurnher D. Initial effects of low-level laser therapy on growth and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 2008;120(3-4):112–7. doi: 10.1007/s00508-008-0932-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu JY, Chen CH, Yeh LY. Low-power laser irradiation promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells via cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5(2):85–91. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2013.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Garcia VG, da Conceicao JM, Fernandes LA, de Almeida JM, Nagata MJ, Bosco AF. Effects of LLLT in combination with bisphosphonate on bone healing in critical size defects: a histological and histometric study in rat calvaria. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(2):407–14. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aleksic V, Aoki A, Iwasaki K, Takasaki AA, Wang CY, Abiko Y. Low-level Er: YAG laser irradiation enhances osteoblast proliferation through activation of MAPK/ERK. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25(4):559–69. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0761-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Renno A, McDonnell P, Parizotto NA, Laakso EL. The effects of laser irradiation on osteoblast and osteosarcoma cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(4):275–80. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martinasso G, Mozzati M, Pol R, Canuto RA, Muzio G. Effect of superpulsed laser irradiation on bone formation in a human osteoblast-like cell line. Minerva stomatol. 2007;56(1/2):27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A. The biomedical effects of laser application. Lasers Surg Med. 1985;5(1):31–9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900050105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schultz RJ, Krishnamurthy S, Thelmo W, Rodriguez JE, Harvey G. Effects of varying intensities of laser energy on articular cartilage: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 1985;5(6):577–88. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900050606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.van Breugel HH, Bar PR. Power density and exposure time of He-Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy dose in photo-biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro. Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(5):528–37. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900120512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Anders JJ, Borke RC, Woolery SK, Van de Merwe WP. Low power laser irradiation alters the rate of regeneration of the rat facial nerve. Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13(1):72–82. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900130113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Balboni GC, Brandi ML, Zonefrati R, Repice F. Effects of He-Ne/IRlaser irradiation on two lines of normal human fibroblasts in vitro. Arch Ital Anat Embriol. 1986;91(3):179–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Silva GB, Mendonca EF, Bariani C, Antunes HS, Silva MA. The prevention of induced oral mucositis with low-level laser therapy in bone marrow transplantation patients: a randomized clinical trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29(1):27–31. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hentschke VS, Jaenisch RB, Schmeing LA, Cavinato PR, Xavier LL, Dal Lago P. Low-level laser therapy improves the inflammatory profile of rats with heart failure. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(3):1007–16. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cidral-Filho FJ, Mazzardo-Martins L, Martins DF. Light-emitting diode therapy induces analgesia in a mouse model of postoperative pain through activation of peripheral opioid receptors and the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(2):695–702. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1385-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES