Abstract
In some bacteria, cysteine is converted to cysteine sulfinic acid by cysteine dioxygenases (CDO) that are only ∼15–30% identical in sequence to mammalian CDOs. Among bacterial proteins having this range of sequence similarity to mammalian CDO are some that conserve an active site Arg residue (“Arg-type” enzymes) and some having a Gln substituted for this Arg (“Gln-type” enzymes). Here, we describe a structure from each of these enzyme types by analyzing structures originally solved by structural genomics groups but not published: a Bacillus subtilis “Arg-type” enzyme that has cysteine dioxygenase activity (BsCDO), and a Ralstonia eutropha “Gln-type” CDO homolog of uncharacterized activity (ReCDOhom). The BsCDO active site is well conserved with mammalian CDO, and a cysteine complex captured in the active site confirms that the cysteine binding mode is also similar. The ReCDOhom structure reveals a new active site Arg residue that is hydrogen bonding to an iron-bound diatomic molecule we have interpreted as dioxygen. Notably, the Arg position is not compatible with the mode of Cys binding seen in both rat CDO and BsCDO. As sequence alignments show that this newly discovered active site Arg is well conserved among “Gln-type” CDO enzymes, we conclude that the “Gln-type” CDO homologs are not authentic CDOs but will have substrate specificity more similar to 3-mercaptopropionate dioxygenases.
Keywords: thiol oxidation, 3-mercaptopropionate dioxygenase, sulfur metabolism, structural genomics, metalloenzyme, non-heme iron
Introduction
Cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) is a non-heme iron-containing protein that converts cysteine to cysteine sulfinic acid (CSA) with the incorporation of both atoms of dioxygen according to the reaction:
![]() |
The enzymatic mechanism of CDO is still not understood despite enzymatic,1–5 spectroscopic,6–9 and crystallographic10–14 characterizations of wild type and mutant CDOs, studies with small molecule analogs of the metallocenter,15,16 and quantum mechanical analyses of potential mechanisms.17–20 All but one5 of these studies have been done on rat/mouse (identical in sequence) or human CDO (99% identical in sequence to rat CDO). As reviewed recently,21 for mammalian CDOs the ferrous iron is coordinated by three His and an ordered water molecule, and nearby is a key Tyr157 residue (rat CDO numbering) in a thioether crosslink with Cys93 and part of a Ser153-His155-Tyr157 catalytic triad. The thioether crosslink is autocatalyzed and increases activity 10-fold1 or more.3,22 Cys, upon binding, displaces the Fe-bound water and ligates the iron via its sulfhydryl and amine groups, with its carboxylate interacting with the side chains of Arg60, Tyr58, and the key catalytic Tyr157.12
Debate about the mechanism centers on whether Cys thiolate is first oxidized by the iron-proximal oxygen atom to form a persulfenate-type intermediate (seen in crystals and shown as structure “A” below) or by the iron distal oxygen atom to form a four-membered ring (shown as structure “B” below) that proceeds via O-O bond breakage to generate an FeIV-oxo intermediate.
![]() |
This has been difficult to sort out due to the lack of spectroscopically discernable intermediates after Cys binding. In addressing questions of enzyme mechanism, it can be helpful to investigate divergent enzyme forms that conserve mechanism but provide a distinct window into the chemistry.
Bacterial CDOs generally have sequence identities <30% compared with the mammalian enzymes5 and have a Gly in place of Cys93, meaning that they have no Cys-Tyr crosslink. Also, some bacterial CDO homologs conserve Arg60 that interacts with the Cys α-carboxylate and others have a Gln in its place5; we will call these “Arg-type” and “Gln-type” CDO homologs, respectively. Four “Arg-type” homologs were shown to have CDO activity,5 but the only activity tests of a “Gln-type” homolog showed that the enzyme from Variovorax paradoxus had no CDO activity, but was active as a 3-mercaptopropionate dioxygenase.23
Structural studies of bacterial CDO homologs would be valuable for the field, and although they have not been described in the literature, two such structures have been solved by structural genomics efforts and been deposited in the Protein Data Bank*: PDB entry 3EQE (released 10/2008), solved by the NorthEast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG), is an Arg-type CDO [with proven activity]5 from Bacillus subtilis (i.e. BsCDO); and PDB entry 2GM6 (released 6/2006), solved by the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (JCSG), is a functionally uncharacterized Ralstonia eutropha CDO homolog (ReCDOhom). Notably, ReCDOhom is 55% identical in sequence to the V. paradoxus mercaptopropionate dioxygenase. In the spirit of maximizing the value of these structures determined by structural genomics efforts, here we describe the BsCDO and ReCDOhom structures and their comparisons with the mammalian CDO structures.
Results and Discussion
Compared with the original PDB entries, the analyses of BsCDO crystals with Cys-bound that diffract to 2.3 Å resolution and the extension of the resolution of ReCDOhom from 1.84 to 1.65 Å have led to improved models with overall Rfree values lowered by ∼3% for BsCDO and ∼1% for ReCDOhom, even at the extended resolutions (Table I). More importantly, we altered some key aspects of the models, most prominently placing a diatomic O2-like molecule rather than a sulfate in the active site of ReCDOhom. Also, our work to reproduce the BsCDO crystals led to the successful capture of a Cys bound in its active site. The remainder of the Results and Discussion section will first summarize broad features of the two proteins and then describe features seen in each active site and their implications.
Table I.
Data Collection and Refinement Statistics for BsCDO and ReCDOhom Structures
| BsCDO unsoakeda | BsCDO Cys-soak | ReCDOhom | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data collection | |||
| Space group | P4322 | P4322 | P41212 |
| Unit cell (Å) | a = b = 65.8, c = 197.3 | a = b = 65.5, c = 199.4 | a = b = 57.01, c = 216.70 |
| Resolution (Å) | 50–2.82 (2.95–2.82) | 50–2.30 (2.30–2.38) | 45–1.65 (1.68–1.65) |
| Unique obs. | 19,930 (2657) | 20,271 (1939) | 44,377 (2185) |
| Multiplicity | 14.2 (9.8) | 23.4 (13.7) | 21.0 (16.5) |
| Completeness | 98.9 (92.3) | 100.0 (100.0) | 100 (100) |
| Average I/σ | 22.9 (3.6) | 13.4 (1.0) | 14.1 (0.6) |
| Rmeas (%)b | 0.086 (0.63) | 0.186 (2.89) | 0.113 (5.33) |
| CC1/2 (%)c | — | 0.999 (0.25) | 1.0 (0.28) |
| Res <I/σ>∼2 (Å)c | — | 2.5 | 1.85 |
| Refinement | |||
| Rcryst/Rfree (%) | 17.7/25.4 | 19.0/26.2 | 17.4/20.0 |
| No. of residues | 308 | 308 | 192 |
| No. of waters | 63 | 67 | 209 |
| No. of atoms | 2422 | 2437 | 3342 |
| Rmsd angles (°) | 1.174 | 1.060 | 1.213 |
| Rmsd lengths (Å) | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| φ,ψ favored (%)d | 94 | 95 | 96 |
| φ,ψ outliers (%)d | 0 | 0.33 | 0 |
| <B> protein (Å2) | 69 | 61 | 48 |
| <B> Fe (Å2) | 63 | 47 | 38 |
| <B> Cys (Å2) | 83e | 64 | |
| <B> O2 (Å2) | 49 | ||
| <B> solvent (Å2)f | 63 | 57 | 57 |
| PDB code | 4QM8 | 4QM9 | 4QMA |
Data collection statistics as reported in the original PDB entry 3EQE.
Rmeas is the multiplicity-weighted merging R.24 For 4QM8, Rmerge is reported.
CC1/2 is the correlation between two half datasets as defined in Karplus and Diederichs.26 Resolution at which <I/σ> ∼ 2 is given for comparison with previous high-resolution cutoff criteria.
Ramachandran statistics as defined by Molprobity.27
For Cys at full occupancy; included in the deposited structure with occupancy = 0 to reflect uncertainty in the interpretation.
Solvent in BsCDO are waters, and in ReCDOhom are water, ethylene glycol, and sulfate.
Overall structures
The structures of both the B. subtilis and R. eutropha enzymes show the expected cupin fold and overlay well with rat CDO despite the low overall sequence identities of ∼21% and 18%, respectively [ Fig. 1(A)]. The BsCDO structures have two copies in the asymmetric unit with the chains agreeing within ∼0.5 Å. Chain A includes residues 1–154 and Chain B residues 1–152 (of 161), and due to crystal contacts, residues 98–102 and the C-terminus of Chain A are more ordered. For ReCDOhom, there is one chain in the asymmetric unit and the modeled residues 11–202 all have reasonable electron density. As seen in a structure-based sequence alignment [ Fig. 1(B)], the sequence of BsCDO is ∼40 residues shorter than ReCDOhom and rat CDO. Most of this (∼20 residues) is due to a shorter C-terminus, and the ordered backbone of BsCDO stops before strand β11 even though enough residues are present in the sequence to form it (Fig. 1). One other notable secondary structural feature is that relative to rat and BsCDO, ReCDOhom has a β-bulge insertion in the middle of strand β6 (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Common cupin-fold of the bacterial CDO homologs. (A) Stereoview of the overlaid ribbon diagrams of R. norvegicus CDO (gold; PDB 4IEU),12 BsCDO (blue; ∼2.3 Å Cα-rmsd vs. rat CDO) and ReCDOhom (green; ∼2.2 Å Cα-rmsd vs. rat CDO) shows the similar overall structure of these three aligned homologs. The active site Arg/Gln and the new active site Arg of the ReCDOhom (Met in rat CDO) are shown along with the iron coordinating His residues and the cysteine substrate as bound to rat CDO and BsCDO. The secondary structure labels are shown, with all three alpha helices being on the N-terminal side of the beta sheets. The overlay was generated using CEalign implemented in Pymol.28 (B) The structure-based sequence alignment of BsCDO ReCDOhom, and R. norvegicus CDO as generated using PROMALS,29 and manually colored according to secondary structure as defined by DSSP.30
Active sites
BsCDO active site
We will first describe the more informative 2.3 Å resolution BsCDO structure with Cys-bound. Similar to known CDO structures,11–14 the active site has a non-heme iron coordinated by three conserved residues His75, His77, His125 [ Fig. 2(A)]. Also present are well-ordered side chains of key residues Tyr141, Arg50, and Tyr48 (corresponding to Tyr157, Arg60, and Tyr58 in rat CDO). Nearby are Ser137 and His139 that with Tyr141 form the catalytic triad, and as expected no crosslink is formed with Tyr141. Interestingly, Ser137 of the catalytic triad does not receive a hydrogen bond, as the Trp77 donor present in mammalian CDO13 is replaced with Ile66 in BsCDO. Additional strong active site 2Fo – Fc density present was well fit by Cys [ Fig. 2(A)]. The bound Cys coordinates the iron in a bidentate fashion via its Sγ and N atoms, with the α-amino group location being defined stereochemically even though it is not well defined by electron density at this resolution [ Fig. 2(A)]. The α-carboxylate hydrogen-bonds with Arg50, Tyr48, and the Cys α-amino group.
Figure 2.

Active site structures of BsCDO and ReCDOhom. Active site density for (A) BsCDO at 2.3 Å resolution with cysteine-bound, (B) unsoaked BsCDO at 2.8 Å resolution, and (C) ReCDOhom at 1.65 Å resolution with a diatomic molecule bound to the metal. All maps are 2Fo – Fc electron density contoured at 1.2 ρrms. The putative dioxygen B-factors at ∼40 Å2 are comparable to the nearby Fe, Tyr164, Arg173 and water ligands which have B-factors in the 35–50 Å2 range. (D) Local overlay of the active sites of BsCDO (blue carbons), ReCDOhom (green carbons), and rat CDO (gold carbons).12
For the 2.8 Å resolution structure of the unsoaked crystal (based on the diffraction data collected by NESG), the iron and active site residues are positioned very similarly to those in the Cys-complex [ Fig. 2(B)]. As was done for PDB entry 3EQE, we modeled three peaks around the iron as waters, but found their refined B-factors at ∼40 Å2 were much lower than the ∼70 Å2 seen for the surrounding atoms. This implies that these peaks are actually not due to water. Because the density peaks match reasonably well with those seen in the 2.3 Å Cys complex, we attempted refining Cys in the active site and obtained reasonable B-factors and a clean difference map, supporting this assignment [see Fig. 2(B), semitransparent model]. Nevertheless, the active site density at this resolution is not definitive, so to be conservative, our final refinement and deposition used the minimal interpretation of three waters in the active site. To ensure that users of the coordinates are aware that Cys may be bound, we also include in the file, with occupancy set to zero, the coordinates and B-factors we obtained by refining a bound Cys at 100% occupancy.
ReCDOhom active site
Unlike the four- and five-coordinate irons seen in ligand-free mammalian CDO at pH 6.211 and pH 8.0,12 the ReCDOhom iron is six-coordinate and liganded by three histidines (His94, His96, and His147), two water/hydroxide molecules, and a diatomic molecule we have modeled as dioxygen [ Fig. 2(C)]. Evidence supporting the assignment as dioxygen are the 123° angle of approach to the iron, the acceptance by the iron-proximal atom of a hydrogen bond from Arg173, the reasonable B-factors [see Fig. 2(C) legend], and lack of residual difference map features. Thus, we will consider it a dioxygen, even while recognizing it could be something else. Elsewhere in the active site, the Ser160-His162-Tyr164 catalytic triad and a Trp (Trp85) hydrogen bonding with Ser160 are conserved with mammalian CDO. The Tyr164 hydroxyl is close (∼3.0 Å) to the iron-bound oxygen, but we consider this a van der Waals interaction, as based on geometry Tyr164 donates a hydrogen bond to the iron bound water/hydroxide [ Fig. 2(C)]. Again, no Cys-Tyr crosslink is present.
As was noted in the Introduction, the typical active site Arg is replaced with Gln67, and this side chain is only weakly ordered. In contrast, a novel ordered active site side-chain, that of Arg173, is sandwiched between the side chains of Ile168 and Phe185. In addition to interacting with dioxygen, Arg173 hydrogen bonds with Asp95-O, Ser187-OH, and a water molecule that in turn interacts with Val171-O and Ser187-NH. Also, related to the position of Arg173 are the presence in ReCDOhom relative to rat CDO and BsCDO of a one-residue deletion after strand β3 (at Thr97) and a two-residue insertion after strand β9 that makes a 310-helix (including Ile168) [ Fig. 1(B)]. These two segments pack against each other to provide the environment of Arg173 [ Fig. 3(A)].
Figure 3.

Arg173 packing interactions and associated residue conservation patterns. (A) Arg173 is well packed with Ile168 and Phe185 positioning the guanidine group with Asp95-O, Ser187-OH, Val175-O, and Ser187-NH participating in hydrogen bonds (dashed lines). An overlaid rat CDO-Cys complex (semi-transparent) is shown with the clash between the α-amino group of Cys-bound in the standard mode and Arg173 indicated (red bars). Similar packing interactions are also seen for the equivalent side chain in PDB entry 3USS, a lower resolution Gln-type CDO homolog structure also not yet described in the literature. (B) WebLogo31 image of residue conservation pattern for Gln-type CDO homologs, The first segment contains the active site Tyr and Gln, and the second contains the conserved Arg173. (C) Same segments as Panel B but for bacterial Arg-type CDO homologs. Aligned sequences included hits that contained key CDO active site residues and had E-value < 10−16 from BLASTP searches against the uniref50 database32 obtained using ReCDOhom for Panel B (20 sequences) and BsCDO for Panel C (13 sequences). The two sets of sequences were aligned together using PROSMALS-3D29 before they were again separated for the Weblogo analysis.
Comparison of BsCDO, ReCDOhom, and rat CDO active sites
An overlay of the active site of BsCDO with Cys bound, ReCDOhom with dioxygen bound, and rat CDO with Cys-persulfenate bound shows the remarkably consistent placement of the iron and the residues equivalent to rat CDO Tyr157 and Tyr58 in all three structures [ Fig. 3(A)]. Also visible in BsCDO and rat CDO are their common positioning of the Cys and the residue equivalent to rat CDO Arg60. This provides strong evidence that BsCDO and other bacterial CDOs conserving Arg60 will be mechanistically equivalent to rat CDO despite missing the Cys-Tyr crosslink.
Also of particular interest is what can be concluded about ReCDOhom and related enzymes having a Gln in the place of Arg60. The Gln67 side chain is located similarly to that of the Arg in BsCDO, but cannot conserve all of its interactions with the Cys α-carboxylate. Also, rather surprisingly, the dioxygen binding site matches the position filled in rat and BsCDOs by the α-amino group of Cys, rather than the position the of oxygen binding inferred from CDO crystal structures [ Fig. 2(D)],12–14 spectroscopic results,6,7,9 and calculations.17,18 An important question is whether these observations imply that the dioxygen site seen is a non-productive binding mode or perhaps reflects that the Gln-type CDO homologs bind oxygen differently. While not able to answer this question in the absence of a complex with a productive substrate bound, we can already conclude that this enzyme cannot bind Cys in the same way as do the CDOs. This is because the well-fixed Arg173 guanidine group, as an obligatory hydrogen bond donor, would form an unfavorable clash with the hydrogen of a bound α-amino group [ Fig. 3(A)].
Arg173 as a key residue for Gln-type CDO homologs
The structure-based sequence alignment [ Fig. 1(B)] shows that ReCDOhom differs from both BsCDO, and rat CDO, in having Arg173 (vs. Met or Cys) and the short indels after strands β3 and β9 that give those loops unique backbone paths stabilizing the Arg173 sidechain. Strikingly, sequence conservation patterns show that both Arg173 and the indels are strongly conserved among Gln-type CDO homologs [ Fig. 3(B)] and are not present in the Arg-type enzymes [ Fig. 3(C)]. This conservation pattern is consistent with a key functional role for Arg173 in the Gln-type CDO homologs, and leads us to conclude that none of the Gln-type enzymes are authentic CDOs—since they could not bind the Cys α-amino group in the expected way.
Taking into account the observation that the V. paradoxus 3-mercaptopropionate dioxygenase23 has 55% sequence identity with ReCDOhom, we propose that the Gln-type enzymes are dioxygenases with specificity for a thiol substrate more similar to 3-mercaptopropionate. At the same time, we refrain from predicting the oxygen binding site in these enzymes, because the modeled oxygen binding site of ReCDOhom is distinct from that seen in CDO, but the key catalytic Tyr residues are similarly positioned [ Figs. 2(D) and 3(A)]. This leads us to ask whether they actually have distinct ways of binding and activating oxygen, or whether one or both of the modes of oxygen binding seen are not relevant to catalysis. We suggest that the comparative study of authentic CDOs and these Gln-type dioxygenases will be very useful for resolving questions about mechanism; and we further suggest that given the amenability of ReCDOhom to high resolution structural studies, ReCDOhom itself would be an excellent system for pursuing further structural, kinetics, and spectroscopic studies of catalysis that would bring new insights into the CDO family of dioxygenases.
Making the most of structural genomics structures
The NIH funded Protein Structure Initiative invested heavily in structural genomics research centers with the dual goals of solving the structures of many representative proteins and protein domains as well as developing high throughput structure determination techniques.33 These efforts were fruitful on both fronts and have accounted for about 13,000 PDB entries (as of July 2014). One unforeseen consequence of these efforts is the thousands of entries in the PDB that have not been described in the peer-reviewed literature. As is, these structures are of limited value to the broader scientific community because they will not show up in literature searches and because no expert having knowledge of both protein crystallography and the particular protein family has carefully vetted the structures for accuracy and information content. We suggest that, as exemplified by our work here on CDO homologs and elsewhere for two sets of peroxiredoxin structures,25,34 there now exists a rich opportunity for researchers with appropriate expertise to make more accessible the many unpublished fruits of structural genomics that are ripe but as yet unharvested for general consumption.
Materials and Methods
BsCDO expression and purification
A BsCDO/pET32a expression plasmid was obtained from the DNASU Plasmid Repository (http://dnasu.asu.edu/DNASU/Home.jsp) in E. coli DH5α cells and used to transform E. coli BL21-DE3 chemically competent cells (Novagen). BsCDO expression and purification basically followed the NESG protocols available in the PSI-knowledge base,33 and yielded ∼2 mg BsCDO per liter culture that was stored frozen at ∼10 mg/mL. Using crystallization conditions reported in the PDB entry, crystals grew in 2–7 days at 298 K in hanging drops of 4 µL BsCDO stock and 4 µL reservoir containing 18% (w/v) PEG4000, 0.1M potassium acetate, 0.05M 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid at pH 6.0.
BsCDO structure determination
Crystals were stored in an artificial mother liquor identical to the reservoir solution, and mounted by pulling through solutions having 20% glycerol as a cryoprotectant and plunging in liquid nitrogen. The Cys complex crystal was soaked 30 s with 100 mM cysteine at pH 7.0. Data for Cys-bound BsCDO were collected at the Advanced Light Source beam-line 5.0.1 in a cryostream. Attempts to get higher resolution data for unliganded BsCDO crystals were unsuccessful. Images were processed using Mosflm35 and Aimless.36 The high resolution cutoff criterion was that the CC1/2 statistic26 be ∼0.2 (Table I). Rfree flags were adopted from PDB entry 3EQE to 2.82 Å resolution, with a random 5% subset selected beyond.
Refinement at 2.3 Å resolution for the Cys-soaked crystal began using PDB entry 3EQE with waters removed, and led to R/Rfree values of 24.0/32.2%. Further refinements used Coot37 for manual model building, Molprobity27 to monitor the model's stereochemical quality, and Phenix38 for minimizations using one TLS group per chain. Sidechain rotomers were adjusted, Met1 was stubbed and an alternate Asn31 conformation was added in chain B, and 69 water molecules were added in places having 2Fo – Fc electron density ≥1 ρrms, Fo – Fc density ≥3 ρrms, and reasonable potential hydrogen bonding. Only near the end was the bound Cys built. The final R/Rfree was 19.0/26.2% (Table I).
The unliganded BsCDO refinement against the deposited data (PDB entry 3EQE) began from the refined Cys-complex model after Cys and active site waters were removed. Other waters were retained except four that shifted beyond 3.5 Å from the protein. The refinements quickly converged to R/Rfree of 17.7/25.4 at 2.82 Å resolution (Table I), an improvement over the values of 24.1/29.6% recorded for PDB entry 3EQE. Evidence that this might also be a Cys complex is described in the results.
Polishing refinement of ReCDOhom
Starting from the deposited coordinates and structure factors of ReCDOhom (PDB ID 2GM6), Phenix refinement using one TLS group and riding hydrogens, resulted in R/Rfree of 17.3/21.2% at 1.84 Å resolution. During manual model building, additional waters, ethylene glycols, and a sulphate were built, and active site density that had been modeled as a sulfate was reinterpreted as a dioxygen. Alternate conformations were added for Glu38, Gly39 and nine solvent molecules, and a Leu124 alternate conformation was removed. The R/Rfree after this stage was 16.9/20.35%, slightly below the 18.2/20.7% values of the deposited entry 2GM6. Then original diffraction images provided by the JCSG were processed (as described above for BsCDO images), yielding data to 1.65 Å resolution (Table I). Rfree flags were adopted from PDB entry 2GM6 to its limiting resolution of 1.84 Å, with a random 5% subset selected beyond. The extended resolution maps were slightly better defined, leading to a final model with further improved R/Rfree values of 17.4/20.0 (Table I) even at the extended resolution limit.
Accession numbers
Coordinates and structure factors for the BsCDO and ReCDOhom models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (lower-resolution BsCDO (PDB code 4QM8); Cysteine-bound BsCDO (PDB code 4QM9); ReCDOhom (PDB code 4QMA)).
Acknowledgments
We thank Rick Cooley and Dale Tronrud for useful discussions and Ryan Mehl for the use of his protein purification facilities. We also thank Ashley Deacon and the Joint Center for Structural Genomics for providing us with the original images collected from ReCDOhom crystals. Synchrotron data were collected at the Advanced Light Source from the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy.
Footnotes
PDB entry 3USS (released January 2012; 2.7 Å resolution) is also a Gln-type bacterial CDO homolog (from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 64% identical to ReCDOhom). It was deposited by the Jameson group that actively investigates CDOs; we do not describe it here as we presume they will be analyzing it.
References
- 1.Dominy JE, Jr, Hwang J, Guo S, Hirschberger LL, Zhang S, Stipanuk MH. Synthesis of amino acid cofactor in cysteine dioxygenase is regulated by substrate and represents a novel post-translational regulation of activity. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:12188–12201. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800044200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ye S, Wu X, Wei L, Tang D, Sun P, Bartlam M, Rao Z. An insight into the mechanism of human cysteine dioxygenase. Key roles of the thioether-bonded tyrosine-cysteine cofactor. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:3391–3402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609337200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siakkou E, Rutledge MT, Wilbanks SM, Jameson GN. Capturing crosslink formation with enzymatic activity in cysteine dioxygenase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1814:2003–2009. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Imsand EM, Njeri CW, Ellis HR. Addition of an external electron donor to in vitro assays of cysteine dioxygenase precludes the need for exogenous iron. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;521:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dominy JE, Jr, Simmons CR, Karplus PA, Gehring AM, Stipanuk MH. Identification and characterization of bacterial cysteine dioxygenases: a new route of cysteine degradation for eubacteria. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:5561–5569. doi: 10.1128/JB.00291-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pierce BS, Gardner JD, Bailey LJ, Brunold TC, Fox BG. Characterization of the nitrosyl adduct of substrate-bound mouse cysteine dioxygenase by electron paramagnetic resonance: electronic structure of the active site and mechanistic implications. Biochemistry. 2007;46:8569–8578. doi: 10.1021/bi700662d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Crawford JA, Li W, Pierce BS. Single turnover of substrate-bound ferric cysteine dioxygenase with superoxide anion: enzymatic reactivation, product formation, and a transient intermediate. Biochemistry. 2011;50:10241–10253. doi: 10.1021/bi2011724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gardner JD, Pierce BS, Fox BG, Brunold TC. Spectroscopic and computational characterization of substrate-bound mouse cysteine dioxygenase: nature of the ferrous and ferric cysteine adducts and mechanistic implications. Biochemistry. 2010;49:6033–6041. doi: 10.1021/bi100189h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li W, Blaesi EJ, Pecore MD, Crowell JK, Pierce BS. Second-sphere interactions between the C93-Y157 cross-link and the substrate-bound Fe site influence the O(2) coupling efficiency in mouse cysteine dioxygenase. Biochemistry. 2013;52:9104–9119. doi: 10.1021/bi4010232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McCoy JG, Bailey LJ, Bitto E, Bingman CA, Aceti DJ, Fox BG, Phillips GN., Jr Structure and mechanism of mouse cysteine dioxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:3084–3089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509262103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Simmons CR, Liu Q, Huang Q, Hao Q, Begley TP, Karplus PA, Stipanuk MH. Crystal structure of mammalian cysteine dioxygenase. A novel mononuclear iron center for cysteine thiol oxidation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:18723–18733. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601555200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Driggers CM, Cooley RB, Sankaran B, Hirschberger LL, Stipanuk MH, Karplus PA. Cysteine dioxygenase structures from pH4 to 9: consistent cys-persulfenate formation at intermediate pH and a Cys-bound enzyme at higher pH. J Mol Biol. 2013;425:3121–3136. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simmons CR, Krishnamoorthy K, Granett SL, Schuller DJ, Dominy JE, Jr, Begley TP, Stipanuk MH, Karplus PA. A putative Fe2+-bound persulfenate intermediate in cysteine dioxygenase. Biochemistry. 2008;47:11390–11392. doi: 10.1021/bi801546n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Souness RJ, Kleffmann T, Tchesnokov EP, Wilbanks SM, Jameson GB, Jameson GN. Mechanistic implications of persulfenate and persulfide binding in the active site of cysteine dioxygenase. Biochemistry. 2013;52:7606–7617. doi: 10.1021/bi400661a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McQuilken AC, Jiang Y, Siegler MA, Goldberg DP. Addition of dioxygen to an N4S(thiolate) iron(II) cysteine dioxygenase model gives a structurally characterized sulfinato-iron(II) complex. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:8758–8761. doi: 10.1021/ja302112y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McQuilken AC, Goldberg DP. Sulfur oxygenation in biomimetic non-heme iron-thiolate complexes. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:10883–10899. doi: 10.1039/c2dt30806a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kumar D, Thiel W, de Visser SP. Theoretical study on the mechanism of the oxygen activation process in cysteine dioxygenase enzymes. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:3869–3882. doi: 10.1021/ja107514f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kumar D, Sastry GN, Goldberg DP, de Visser SP. Mechanism of S-oxygenation by a cysteine dioxygenase model complex. J Phys Chem A. 2012;116:582–591. doi: 10.1021/jp208230g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aluri S, de Visser SP. The mechanism of cysteine oxygenation by cysteine dioxygenase enzymes. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14846–14847. doi: 10.1021/ja0758178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Visser SP, Straganz GD. Why do cysteine dioxygenase enzymes contain a 3-His ligand motif rather than a 2His/1Asp motif like most nonheme dioxygenases? J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:1835–1846. doi: 10.1021/jp809700f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stipanuk MH, Simmons CR, Karplus PA, Dominy JE., Jr Thiol dioxygenases: unique families of cupin proteins. Amino Acids. 2011;41:91–102. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0518-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Njeri CW, Ellis HR. Shifting redox states of the iron center partitions CDO between crosslink formation or cysteine oxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;558:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bruland N, Wubbeler JH, Steinbuchel A. 3-mercaptopropionate dioxygenase, a cysteine dioxygenase homologue, catalyzes the initial step of 3-mercaptopropionate catabolism in the 3,3-thiodipropionic acid-degrading bacterium variovorax paradoxus. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:660–672. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806762200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Diederichs K, Karplus PA. Improved R-factors for diffraction data analysis in macromolecular crystallography. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:269–275. doi: 10.1038/nsb0497-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gretes MC, Karplus PA. Observed octameric assembly of a Plasmodium yoelii peroxiredoxin can be explained by the replacement of native “ball-and-socket” interacting residues by an affinity tag. Protein Sci. 2013;22:1445–1452. doi: 10.1002/pro.2328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Karplus PA, Diederichs K. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science. 2012;336:1030–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1218231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen VB, Arendall WB, 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Cryst D. 2010;66:12–21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 1998;11:739–747. doi: 10.1093/protein/11.9.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pei J, Kim BH, Tang M, Grishin NV. PROMALS web server for accurate multiple protein sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W649–W652. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Joosten RP, te Beek TA, Krieger E, Hekkelman ML, Hooft RW, Schneider R, Sander C, Vriend G. A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D411–D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14:1188–1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Suzek BE, Huang H, McGarvey P, Mazumder R, Wu CH. UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1282–1288. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berman HM, Westbrook JD, Gabanyi MJ, Tao W, Shah R, Kouranov A, Schwede T, Arnold K, Kiefer F, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Podvinec M, Adams PD, Carter LG, Minor W, Nair R, Baer JL. The protein structure initiative structural genomics knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D365–D368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Perkins A, Gretes MC, Nelson KJ, Poole LB, Karplus PA. Mapping the active site helix-to-strand conversion of CxxxxC peroxiredoxin Q enzymes. Biochemistry. 2012;51:7638–7650. doi: 10.1021/bi301017s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leslie A. Recent changes to the MOSFLM package for processing film and image plate data. Joint CCP4 + ESF-EAMCB Newsletter on Protein Crystallography. 1992 No. 26. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Cryst. 2006;D62:72–82. doi: 10.1107/S0907444905036693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Cryst D. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Cryst D. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



