Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2014 Nov 18;116(1):99–107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304710

Bone Marrow Characteristics Associated with Changes in Infarct Size after STEMI: A Biorepository Evaluation from the CCTRN TIME Trial

Robert C Schutt 1, Barry H Trachtenberg 1, John P Cooke 1, Jay H Traverse 2, Timothy D Henry 2, Carl J Pepine 4, James T Willerson 5, Emerson C Perin 5, Stephen G Ellis 7, David X M Zhao 8, Aruni Bhatnagar 9, Brian H Johnstone 10, Dejian Lai 11, Micheline Resende 5, Ray F Ebert 12, Joseph C Wu 13, Shelly L Sayre 10, Aaron Orozco 5, Claudia Zierold 6, Robert D Simari 14, Lem Moyé 11, Christopher R Cogle 4, Doris A Taylor 5; for the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN)3
PMCID: PMC4282599  NIHMSID: NIHMS643885  PMID: 25406300

Abstract

Rationale

Despite significant interest in bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMC) therapy for ischemic heart disease, current techniques have resulted in only modest benefits. However, select patients have shown improvements after autologous BMC therapy, but the contributing factors are unclear.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to identify BMC characteristics associated with a reduction in infarct size following STEMI.

Methods and Results

This prospective study comprised patients consecutively enrolled in the CCTRN TIME trial who agreed to have their BMCs stored and analyzed at the CCTRN Biorepository. Change in infarct size between baseline (3 days after percutaneous coronary intervention) and 6-month follow-up was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Infarct-size measurements and BMC phenotype and function data were obtained for 101 patients (mean age, 56.5 years; mean screening ejection fraction, 37%; mean baseline cMRI ejection fraction, 45%). At 6 months, 75 patients (74.3%) showed a reduction in infarct size (mean change, -21.0%±17.6%). Multiple regression analysis indicated that infarct size reduction was greater in patients who had a larger percentage of CD31+ BMCs (P=0.046) and in those with faster BMC growth rates in CFU-Hill and ECFC functional assays (P=0.033 and P=0.032, respectively).

Conclusions

This study identified BMC characteristics associated with a better clinical outcome in patients with STEMI and highlighted the importance of endothelial precursor activity in regenerating infarcted myocardium. Furthermore, it suggests that for these STEMI patients, myocardial repair was more dependent on baseline BMC characteristics than on whether the patient underwent intracoronary BMC transplantation.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00684021

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, coronary circulation, cardiac regeneration, cellular therapy – experimental

Introduction

Despite advances in emergency care and reperfusion therapy, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality.1, 2 In studies of cardiovascular cell therapy, harvested bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMCs), including hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell populations (eg, mesenchymal stromal cells3, 4 and endothelial progenitor cells5), have been isolated and re-infused by intracoronary infusion into the heart. Clinical trials assessing the use of intracoronary transplantation of autologous BMCs to promote cardiovascular repair in patients with STEMI have shown promising but mixed results.6 Therefore, a better understanding of the relationship between patient BMC characteristics and clinical outcomes is needed to determine whether the use of BMC therapy for cardiovascular diseases should be continued.

Several factors may explain the mixed responses seen in cell therapy clinical trials, including heterogeneity of BMC composition, differences in cell processing techniques, dose administered, timing and route of delivery, and patient characteristics. Although the study protocols were often designed to control for some of these factors, patients' bone marrow characteristics were rarely assessed in relation to clinical outcomes. However, identifying the patterns in BMC characteristics associated with improved outcomes could lead to better patient selection and personalized enrichment of therapeutic cells in the product before transplantation and would enhance our understanding of the mechanisms involved in cardiovascular regeneration and repair.

In the current study, we sought to identify BMC characteristics associated with changes in infarct size after STEMI. Infarct size was chosen as the primary outcome for our analyses because it is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease7 and measurements for this outcome are highly reproducible.

Methods

This prospective cohort study comprised patients consecutively enrolled in the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) Timing in Myocardial Infarction Evaluation (TIME) trial who participated in the 6-month follow-up and provided written consent to have their excess BMCs stored for further analyses at the CCTRN Biorepository.8, 9 These analyses were pre-specified in the Ancillary Functional Studies for the CCTRN protocol. The design and rationale of the CCTRN TIME trial and the CCTRN Biorepository are described elsewhere.9, 10 Briefly, CCTRN TIME was a multicenter, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial conducted at 5 clinical centers, their satellite facilities, and a data coordinating center. The trial protocol was approved by the local institutional review boards at each center, and participants provided written informed consent. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 150 million BMCs or placebo by intracoronary infusion on either day 3 or day 7 after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With permission, the excess BMCs were sent to the CCTRN Biorepository for phenotype and functional analyses and storage.9

Cell processing and transportation

A detailed description of the cell processing and transportation protocol used has been reported previously.11 During the CCTRN TIME clinical trial, bone marrow was obtained from each participant's posterior iliac crest. This bone marrow was then combined with preservative-free heparin and transported at ambient temperature to a cell processing center at each clinical site. At the cell processing center, the bone marrow was filtered, tested for sterility, and processed to isolate the mononuclear cells by using the Sepax system (Biosafe SA, Geneva, Switzerland). After the BMC treatment product was prepared, the excess cells were shipped overnight in commercial cell-transportation packaging (EXAKT Technologies, Oklahoma City, OK) to the University of Florida and the University of Minnesota for functional and flow cytometric (FC) analyses.

Flow cytometry sample preparation and antibody labeling

Flow cytometric analysis was used to immunophenotype the BMC populations. Briefly, to lyse the red blood cells, we incubated the samples in ACK lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, and 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2-7.4) for 5 minutes at room temperature. The remaining cells were then washed twice in phosphate buffered saline + 2.5% fetal calf serum (2.5% PBS). Cell concentration and viability were determined by using the Guava ViaCount assay on a Guava PCA-96 system (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) unless otherwise specified. Bone marrow cells were analyzed with 2 separate panels of antibodies and their respective isotype-matched controls: 1) CD45, CD34, CD133, KDR, and CD31 and 2) CD45, CD3, CD19, CD11b, CXCR4, and CD14 (Online Table I). Labeled cells were then incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes in the dark, washed twice in 2.5% PBS, and re-suspended to a final volume of 1mL in 2.5% PBS for FC analysis.

Flow cytometry instrument set up, controls, and fluorochrome compensation

Flow cytometric data were acquired by using a BD LSR II Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) with 4 fixed-aligned, air-cooled lasers: 20 mW UV laser (355 nm), 25 mW violet laser (405 nm), 20 mW blue laser (488 nm), and 17 mW red laser (635 nm). The lasers, photomultiplier tubes, dichroic long pass mirrors, band pass filters, and fluorochromes are listed in Online Table II, and the optical pathway configuration is depicted in Online Figure I. Before immunophenotyping was begun, instrument performance was validated by using BD Cytometer Setup and Tracking Beads (BD Biosciences). Six-peak Rainbow Calibration Particles (Spherotech Inc., Lake Forest, IL) were used to set and maintain the target median fluorescence intensity values throughout the study. Before data acquisition, hardware compensation was performed with cells stained with a single fluorochrome (Online Table III) by using the Compensation Setup feature of BD FACSDiva 6.0 software (BD Biosciences) and a compensation matrix.

Flow cytometry data acquisition and data analysis

Flow cytometric data were acquired on a BD Biosciences LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) at a ‘low’ flow rate within the first hour after sample preparation by using FACS DIVA 6.0 software. Events were triggered on the forward scatter signal. A minimum of 105 events were acquired for analysis. A trained operator blinded to the patient's characteristics performed all of the tests and analyzed the data throughout the study. Acquired data were analyzed using FlowJo software 7.6.5 (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR). Data analysis was performed by first gating around the individual lymphocyte, monocyte, and granulocyte populations, as determined on the basis of their forward scatter versus side scatter properties (Figure 1A). Cell debris and small particles were omitted from the analysis by excluding events with low forward scatter. All analyses were performed on gated lymphocytes unless otherwise specified. Online Figure II shows representative single-color histograms comparing antibodies to the isotype-matched control antibodies. CD34+ and CD34+CD133+ cells in the BMC product were measured using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) strategy throughout the FC analysis.9, 12

Figure 1. Gating strategy used for analyzing CD31+ cells and CD31+ cell subsets.

Figure 1

A, Representative dot plot showing the gates used to identify BMC populations based on forward scatter (FSC-A) versus side scatter (SSC-A). B, Representative histogram showing CD31+ cells within the lymphocyte gate. Blue indicates CD31+ cells, and red indicates the isotype control. C, Representative dot plot showing the CD45+CD31+ cells within the lymphocyte gate. D, Representative dot plot showing the CD45+CD31low subset within the lymphocyte gate (gate for the subset shown in black). Percentages shown in panels B, C, and D are based on the total lymphocyte population. All data presented are from a single patient.

Functional analyses

Trypan blue exclusion was used to assess viability of the cells that underwent functional analysis.9 BMC function was evaluated with 3 separate assays: the colony-forming unit Hill (CFU-Hill), the endothelial-colony forming cell (ECFC), and the colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-F) assays.9, 11, 13, 14 The number of colony forming units, type of colonies, and percent confluency were recorded on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 for the ECFC and CFU-F assays and on days 4 through 9 for the CFU-Hill assay. Results from all 3 assays were assessed with the following 3 metrics: 1) slope of the best-fit linear curve for the percent confluency over time, 2) exponential constant of the best-fit exponential curve for the number of colonies over time, and 3) maximum number of colonies present over the entire culture period.

Measurement of infarct size

The outcome measure of interest, change in infarct size, was calculated by subtracting the baseline measurement taken 3 days after primary PCI from the measurement made at 6 months. Infarct size was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) using delayed contrast-enhanced imaging where appropriate. To improve infarct size measurements for the current study, we used a cMRI algorithm that corrected for left ventricular mass; this algorithm was not used in the original CCTRN TIME study. Infarct size and BMC measurements were made by laboratory personnel masked to all clinical data and treatment assignments. Further details regarding the trial protocol and assessment of individual outcomes can be found in a previous report.10

Statistical analyses

When assessing the relationships between change in infarct size from baseline to 6 months and demographic variables, we categorized infarct size as a dichotomous variable (ie, either as a decrease or an increase). For this set of analyses, associations with continuous variables were determined by using an unpaired t-test and associations with categorical variables were determined by using the Fisher's exact test. When the relationships between BMC parameters (cell phenotype and function) and infarct size were assessed, infarct size was treated as a continuous variable. These associations were determined by using both univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses, in which the dependent variable was change in infarct size. Covariates for the multivariable model were selected based on previous data that suggested these factors would be relevant and biologically plausible to model the hypothesized relationship between bone marrow parameters and change in infarct size. Covariates for the model included age,15 baseline infarct size, diabetes,16 angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use,17, 18 hypertension,19 smoking status,20 and treatment received in the clinical trial.6 In this first assessment of the relationships between BMC characteristics and infarct size, we conducted multiple statistical tests. Because this was an exploratory assessment, we prioritized knowledge discovery, and we did not employ statistical techniques to reduce the familywise error rate (eg, Bonferroni correction).

Results

In the CCTRN TIME clinical trial, 120 patients with STEMI underwent bone marrow aspiration and were randomized to receive either BMCs or placebo. Complete infarct size measurements and BMC product analyses were available for 101 (84.0%) of these patients. Reasons for incomplete follow-up were reported previously.8 At the 6-month follow-up, 75 patients (74.3%) showed a reduction in infarct size from baseline, with a mean infarct size of 50.4 g ± 25.3 g at baseline and 29.4 g ± 17.0 g at 6-month follow-up (mean change, -21.0 g ± 17.6 g). The patients who showed an increase in infarct size (n=26) had a mean infarct size of 30.9 g ± 19.8 g at baseline and 41.3 g ± 20.3 g at 6-month follow-up (mean change, 10.4 g ± 12.1 g). In Table 1, we present the baseline characteristics of patients when stratified according to direction of change in infarct size. With the exception of initial infarct size, there were no significant differences at baseline between patients who showed a reduction in infarct size at 6 months and those who showed an increase in infarct size. The initial infarct size measurements taken at day 3 and day 7 post myocardial infarction were found to significantly correlate with ejection fraction at 6 months (day 3: r=-0.376, P < 0.001; day 7: r= -0.601, P < 0.001). Of the 75 patients who showed a reduction in infarct size at 6 months, 51 (68.0%) had been treated with BMCs and 24 (32.0%) had received placebo. Of the 26 patients who showed an increase in infarct size at 6 months, 15 (57.7%) had been treated with BMCs and 11 (42.3%) had received placebo. Consistent with the results from the clinical trial, we found no significant difference in the change in infarct size over time between patients who received BMC therapy and those who did not (–13.3 g ± 20.1 g versus –12.2 g ± 23.9 g, P = 0.802). In addition, when patients were stratified by both direction of change in infarct size and treatment type, no significant differences were found between the 4 groups for any of the demographic variables assessed (Online Table IV).

Table 1. Demographics and Clinical Data of Patients Stratified by Change in Infarct Size at 6 months.

Δ infarct size < 0
(decreased)
(n=75)
Δ infarct size > 0
(increased)
(n=26)
P value
Demographics
 Age (years) 57.0 ± 10.8 55.4 ± 10.7 0.512
 Female 12 (16%) 3 (11.5%) 0.754
 Height (meters) 1.76 ± 0.10 1.75± 0.08 0.666
 Weight (kg) 94.9 ± 19.5 93.2 ± 23.1 0.725
 BMI (kg/m2) 30.5 ± 5.2 30.2 ± 6.6 0.855
Prior medical history
 Diabetes 14 (18.7%) 7 (26.9%) 0.406
 Hypertension 46 (61.3%) 13 (50%) 0.360
 Hyperlipidemia 53 (70.7%) 16 (61.5%) 0.465
 History of angina 16 (21.3%) 3 (11.5%) 0.386
 Smoking 44 (58.7%) 18 (69.2%) 0.484
Cardiovascular and infarction details
 Baseline infarct size (grams) 50.4 ± 25.3 30.9 ± 19.8 0.001
 Heart rate 80.1 ± 15.7 82.2 ± 11.2 0.524
 Systolic BP (mmHg) 119.8 ± 19.7 111.3 ± 16.7 0.053
 Diastolic BP (mmHg) 73.6 ± 14.2 73.2 ± 13.5 0.889
 LV end-diastolic volume index (mL/m2) 74.4 ± 17.3 73.2 ± 16.9 0.753
 LV end-systolic volume index (mL/m2) 40.5 ± 12.5 42.0 ± 14.9 0.439
 Screening EF (echocardiography) 37% ± 6% 36% ± 8% 0.719
 Core lab EF (day 3) (cMRI) 46% ± 10% 42% ± 12% 0.137
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 14.1 ± 2 13.4 ± 1 0.142
 High sensitivity CRP (mg/L) 39.8 ± 49.1 33.8 ± 24 0.568
 Peak CK (U/L) 2970.8 ± 2104.9 3180.0 ± 2734.1 0.703
 Peak CKMB (ng/mL) 254.0 ± 190.1 255.8 ± 218.2 0.972
 BNP (pg/mL) 325.9 ± 655 214.6 ± 132.5 0.466
 NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 1428.2 ± 1367.3 1440.6 ± 1873.6 0.988
 Troponin T (peak) (ng/mL) 9.3 ± 7.6 9.2 ± 6.9 0.963
 Troponin I (peak) (ng/mL) 76.1 ± 91 118.6 ± 163.7 0.478
 Drug eluting stent 63 (84%) 18 (69.2%) 0.151
 LAD infarction 67 (89.3%) 23 (88.5%) 1.000
 Preinfarction angina 14 (18.7%) 3 (11.5%) 0.548
 Transferred after MI 33 (44%) 11 (42.3%) 1.000
 PCI at non-study center hospital 6 (8%) 2 (7.7%) 1.000
Discharge medications
 ACE inhibitor 62 (82.7%) 23 (88.5%) 0.756
 Aspirin 72 (96%) 26 (100%) 0.567
 Beta blocker 73 (97.3%) 26 (100%) 1.000
 Clopidogrel or prasugrel 73 (97.3%) 23 (88.5%) 0.106
 Statins 71 (94.7%) 22 (84.6%) 0.199
 Diuretic 16 (21.3%) 5 (19.2%) 1.000
 Coumadin or enoxaparin 15 (20%) 2 (7.7%) 0.225
Cell product information
 Time from PCI to infusion (days) 5.1 ± 2.3 4.6 ± 2 0.245
 Time from aspiration to infusion (hours) 8.7 ± 2.9 8.6 ± 1.5 0.846
 Final volume (mL) 149.7 ± 1.9 144.2 ± 28.6 0.097
 Cell product viability (%) 98.1 ± 1.6 98.5 ± 1 0.284

Values shown as the mean ± SD or number (%). BMI, body mass index; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide BP, blood pressure; CK, creatine kinase; CKMB, creatine kinase-MB; CRP, C-reactive protein; EF, ejection fraction; LAD, left anterior descending; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

The BMC phenotype and functional assay results are summarized in Table 2. When univariable analysis was performed to compare the results for patients who showed a reduction in infarct size at 6 months and those who showed an increase in infarct size, no significant differences in cell frequency were found for the phenotypes assessed. However, a significant difference was observed in the BMC functional assessments. Specifically, the exponential constant for the ECFC assay was significantly higher in patients who showed a reduction in infarct size than in those who showed an increase in infarct size. In contrast, the CFU-Hill and CFU-F assays indicated no difference between patients who showed a reduction in infarct size at 6 months and those who showed an increase in infarct size. When patients were stratified by both direction of change in infarct size and treatment type for the phenotype and functional comparisons, a significant difference was found in the frequency of CD19+ cells (Online Table V).

Table 2. BMC Phenotype and Functional Characteristics of Patients Stratified by Change in Infarct Size at 6 Months.

Δ infarct size < 0*
(decreased)
(n=75)
Δ infarct size > 0*
(increased)
(n=26)
Unadjusted
P value
Effect size Adjusted
P value
Cell phenotype (% positive)
 CD3+ 65.5 (58.0-73.9) 70.3(65.9-74.5) 0.871 0.03 0.456
 CD11b+ 72.0 (57.5-79.7) 69.9 (63.7-76.0) 0.114 -0.02 0.638
 CD14+ (% monocytes) 56.2 (46.6-68.6) 58.2 (48.1-65.4) 0.363 0.12 0.177
 CD19+ 11.4 (8.2-14.9) 9.0 (5.9-10.8) 0.122 -0.47 0.322
 CD31+ 40.5 (34.6-48.0) 37.6 (29.0-42.2) 0.154 -0.36 0.046
 CD45+CD31+ 39.3 (33.4-46.7) 36.5 (28.2-41.0) 0.184 -0.37 0.042
 CD45+CD31low 30.6 (25.5-36.3) 28.4 (21.1-33.0) 0.078 -0.52 0.015
 CD34+ 4.0 (2.7-6.3) 4.4 (3.3-5.4) 0.269 0.90 0.577
 CD34+ (ISHAGE) 1.9 (1.4-2.7) 2.0 (1.5-2.7) 0.165 1.95 0.807
 CD34+CD133+ (ISHAGE) 0.9 (0.6-1.5) 1.0 (0.7-1.3) 0.370 1.59 0.996
 CD45+ 94.6 (91.7-96.8) 95.0 (91.8-96.3) 0.461 0.02 0.593
 CD133+ 2.4 (1.7-4.3) 2.9 (2.2-3.7) 0.956 0.88 0.849
 CXCR4+ 42.6 (34.1-54.1) 38.7 (27.3-49.1) 0.723 0.01 0.939
 KDR+ 0.2 (0.1-0.3) 0.2 (0.1-0.5) 0.620 0.405 0.914
 CD133+KDR+ 0.011 (0.005-0.030) 0.011 (0.004-0.020) 0.090 -49.38 0.392
Functional analysis
 CFU-Hill (exponential constant of colony #) 0.4 (0.0-0.7) 0.2 (0.0-0.3) 0.061 -6.21 0.033
 CFU-Hill (maximum colony #) 4.5 (0.0-11.5) 5.0 (2.0-15.0) 0.661 -0.17 0.259
 CFU-Hill (linear slope of confluency) 14.6 (10.6-19.3) 14.9 (7.2-16.6) 0.655 0.57 0.590
 ECFC (exponential constant of colony #) 0.1 (0.0-1.5) 0.0 (0.0-0.1) 0.003 -8.66 0.032
 ECFC (maximum colony #) 0.0 (0.0-14.0) 0.0 (0.0-21.0) 0.828 -0.03 0.626
 ECFC (linear slope of confluency) 2.8 (0.7-3.8) 2.5 (0.9-5.2) 0.670 -0.64 0.539
 CFU-F (exponential constant of colony #) 1.4 (0.0-1.6) 0.0 (0.0-1.6) 0.052 -8.64 0.059
 CFU-F (maximum colony #) 4.0 (1.0-8.0) 6.0 (0.0-14.0) 0.356 0.37 0.184
 CFU-F (linear slope of confluency) 2.2 (1.7-3.6) 2.8 (1.2-3.4) 0.119 2.86 0.493

All FC analyses were performed on gated lymphocytes unless otherwise specified.

*

Values represent median and interquartile range.

Value is the coefficient from multivariate regression model and represents the modeled change in infarct size (grams) per unit increase in the variable.

P value for the multivariable regression model that includes adjustment for age, baseline infarct size, history of hypertension, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, ACE inhibitor use, and treatment received (BMCs or placebo).

Multiple regression analysis was also used to model the relationships between either cell phenotype or functional parameters and change in infarct size (results also shown in Table 2). After adjusting for age, history of diabetes, baseline infarct size, ACE inhibitor use, hypertension, history of smoking, and therapy assignment in the clinical trial (BMC or placebo), patients with a higher percentage of CD31+ cells were shown to have a larger reduction in infarct size at 6 months (P=0.046). Additional gating analyses to explore this association (Figure 1) showed that a higher percentage of CD45+CD31+ cells (P=0.042), specifically CD45+CD31low cells (P=0.015), was associated with a larger reduction in infarct size. To further explore this association, we show the changes in infarct size between day 3 and the 6-month follow-up stratified by the percentage of CD34+CD31low cells in the BMC product (Figure 2). In multivariable regression analysis the percentage of CD19+ cells was not associated with change in infarct size (P=0.322). When multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess differences in BMC functional parameters, a higher exponential constant for the colony growth curve was found to be associated with a larger reduction in infarct size at 6 months in both the CFU-Hill and ECFC assays (P=0.030 and P=0.032, respectively). However, treatment assignment (BMCs or placebo) was not associated with a reduction in infarct size (P=0.706) at 6 months in the multivariate analysis.

Figure 2. Individual changes in infarct size between day 3 and the 6-month follow-up for patients stratified by the percentage of CD45+CD31low cells.

Figure 2

Discussion

The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify patterns in BMC characteristics associated with either an increase or a decrease in infarct size in patients with STEMI. To accomplish this, we analyzed data from patients in the CCTRN TIME trial who provided consent to have their BMC product analyzed by the CCTRN Biorepository laboratories. Multivariable regression analysis showed that an increased percentage of CD31+ cells in the bone marrow was associated with a greater reduction in infarct size at 6 months after STEMI. In addition, a greater reduction in infarct size was associated with a faster BMC growth rate in CFU-Hill and ECFC functional assays. Thus, our findings suggest that phenotype and functional assessments of bone marrow may be important for understanding individual responses to cell therapy in patients with acute STEMI. In addition, they may provide a means to prognosticate outcomes after STEMI and to evaluate the mechanisms underlying responses to myocardial injury.

CD31 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1) is a cell-surface protein present on hematopoietic progenitor cells, myelomonocytic cells, and differentiated endothelial cells. It is known to regulate leukocyte adhesion and migration.21, 22 In patients with STEMI, CD31 is highly expressed in the culprit plaque.23 Recently, it was demonstrated in both mice and humans that the CD31+CD45+ phenotype identifies a population of highly angiogenic and vasculogenic cells that express cell markers associated with hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.24 In the same study, gene set enrichment analysis showed that the expression levels of proangiogenic genes are higher in bone marrow-derived CD31+CD45+ cells than in CD31- cells. It has also been reported that CD31+ cell therapy for myocardial infarction leads to efficient repair of ischemia in pre-clinical models.25 This finding in animals supports our current clinical study finding that a higher percentage of CD31+ cells in the BMC product was associated with a decrease in infarct size at 6 months after STEMI, possibly because of improved vascularization of the infarcted zone.

In our study, BMC function was assessed to determine whether ex vivo-derived metrics correlate with in vivo potential. BMC function was assessed with the CFU-Hill, ECFC, and CFU-F assays. Our results showed that the exponential constant for the CFU-Hill colony growth curve was associated with a reduction in infarct size after STEMI. These findings support those from previous studies showing that patients with a higher number of colonies cultured by the CFU-Hill assay have lower long-term cardiovascular risk.13, 26 Our study also showed that rapid outgrowth of endothelial progenitor colonies, as measured by the ECFC assay, was associated with a greater reduction in infarct size at 6 months. In agreement with our findings, previous studies have demonstrated that ECFC cells are mobilized following myocardial infarction and that a higher ECFC frequency is associated with a reduction in infarct size following STEMI.27-29 Interestingly, for both the ECFC and the CFU-Hill assays, we found that the exponential constant of the colony growth curve (determined by recording the colony number on days 7, 14, 21, and 28), but not the maximum number of colonies, was associated with a larger reduction in infarct size after STEMI, suggesting that the capacity for rapid cell growth is important for reducing infarct size.

Although CFU-Hill colonies were initially thought to be composed of endothelial progenitor cells, recent studies have shown that these colonies actually comprise a mixture of lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and various subpopulations of endothelial cells.14, 30 This agrees with our findings that patients whose BMCs produced higher numbers of CFU-Hill colonies also had a higher percentage of CD45+CD31+ cells (myelomonocytic cells, macrophages) in the bone marrow. Furthermore, the fact that we found these cell phenotypes and functions to be associated with a larger reductions in infarct size at 6 months is consistent with emerging data showing that monocytes play a key role in cardiac angiogenesis and collateral vessel formation, thereby contributing to cardiac repair after myocardial infarction.31-33 In fact, when a myocardial injury occurs, monocytes/macrophages show a biphasic response.31 Shortly after an injury, monocytes and type-1 (inflammatory) macrophages are recruited to the site via monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. However, within several days, type-2 (reparative) macrophages arrive to participate in injury resolution and contribute to cardiac angiogenesis and collateral vessel formation.

The CFU-F assay is a functional assessment of bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, which are fibroblast-like cells capable of differentiating into bone, cartilage, adipose tissue, and fibrous tissue.34, 35 There is increasing evidence that these cells may have a significant role in the response to injury in patients with ischemic cardiac disease.36-38 In this study, none of the metrics measured with the CFU-F assay were found to be significant (ie, the P values were < 0.05). However, this assay does show promise given that the results only narrowly missed our definition of statistical significance (unadjusted P=0.052 and adjusted P=0.059). Therefore, we recommend that future studies evaluate the role of this assay in assessing response to myocardial injury.

Although BMC therapy was not shown to have a therapeutic effect in the original CCTRN TIME trial,8 there is still much information that can be gained by analyzing the BMC product from these patients with STEMI. First, our findings may provide new insight regarding the cellular subsets responsible for repair in patients with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, our findings suggest that bone marrow composition may be a predictor of clinical outcomes. For the patients in this study, transplantation of autologous BMCs into the heart did not affect the clinical outcomes assessed, whereas the endogenous BMC characteristics at baseline were found to be associated with a reduction in infarct size. Both BMCs and progenitor cells are known to home to ischemic myocardium after an injury.39-41 Given that endogenous mechanisms for progenitor cell recruitment already exist, it may be more important to promote favorable bone marrow activity than to artificially translocate regenerative cells into the injured tissue. Therefore, our study may suggest important therapeutic targets for cardiovascular regenerative therapies.

When interpreting the results of this study, several factors should be taken into consideration. First, this study was limited to analyses of BMCs obtained at a single time point after myocardial infarction. However, information from one point in time is not likely to completely capture the dynamic nature of the injury response. Second, although the injury response may include BMCs, cells in the peripheral circulation, and local inflammatory responses, we only assessed BMC characteristics in this study. Despite this limitation, we were able to identify multiple associations with the outcome of interest. Third, although the analyses performed in this study were pre-specified, this was a biologically guided exploratory study. In an attempt to balance this and focus on the characteristics with the potential to influence the future direction of cell therapy, we limited our discussion to the associations for which there is a strong biological rationale for the relationship and compelling pre-clinical data to support our findings. Fourth, some patients in our study cohort received cell therapy as part of the clinical trial, whereas others received placebo. This was unlikely to have affected our results because change in infarct size was not found to be significantly different for patients who received the stem cell product and those who received placebo in the CCTRN TIME trial. However, we adjusted for this treatment difference in the statistical model to limit its potential for being a confounding factor. Fifth, in patients with an acute infarction, quantifying infarct size by using cMRI can be problematic because these measurements may include areas of myocardial necrosis as well as areas of edema and inflammation.42 Therefore, changes in infarct size may reflect changes in inflammation in addition to changes in the pattern of necrosis. Characterizing patients on the basis of infarct size could generate a regression to the mean scenario in which patients with a small infarct size at baseline are unlikely to show much change, whereas those with a large infarct size at baseline may show a smaller infarct size at the 6-month follow-up. To help determine whether the observed changes in infarct size were in fact related to changes in myocardial necrosis, we explored correlations between the infarct size calculated by using cMRI and both CKMB level and ejection fraction, two variables known to be associated with infarct size. In this analysis, the correlation between CKMB level and day 3 infarct size was relatively weak (R2=0.35), whereas the correlation between CKMB level and day 7 infarct size was much stronger (R2=0.66). The correlations between day 3 infarct size and day 3 ejection fraction (R2=0.27) and day 7 ejection fraction (R2=0.45) were both low to moderate. Overall, the correlations between the cMRI measurement of infarct size and the surrogate markers were moderate. Finally, because this was an exploratory study, any relationships found to be significant will have to be reassessed in a confirmatory study.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive report of the correlation between BMC phenotype and functional assay results and infarct size in patients with STEMI. This type of analysis may be useful for generating hypotheses regarding the role of cellular subsets in cardiovascular repair. Furthermore, although the response to cell therapy with unselected BMCs was limited in the CCTRN TIME trial, this study may provide a means to significantly improve cell product composition, optimize patient selection for clinical trials, and personalize medical therapies for patients with heart disease.

Supplementary Material

304710R2 Online Data Supplement

Novelty and Significance.

What Is Known?

  • In cardiovascular cell therapy, harvested bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMCs) are isolated and re-infused into the heart by using intracoronary infusion, with the goal of repairing injured myocardium after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

  • Clinical trials of intracoronary autologous BMC transplantation in patients with STEMI have shown varied results

What New Information Does This Article Contribute?

  • Specific populations of bone marrow mononuclear cells were found to be associated with reduced infarct size after STEMI.

  • Patients who had BMCs that showed faster growth of endothelial precursor cells in in vitro assays had larger reductions in infarct size after STEMI.

  • Transplantation of autologous BMCs into the heart did not affect clinical outcomes; rather, endogenous BMC characteristics at baseline were found to be associated with reduced infarct size.

Because STEMI is a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, an important area of ongoing investigation is the identification of specific BMC subsets that are involved in myocardial repair. In this study, we evaluated the baseline BMC characteristics of participants in the CCTRN TIME trial, a randomized, controlled trial assessing the use of autologous BMC transplantation in patients with STEMI. Although infusion of autologous BMCs into the heart did not affect clinical outcomes, some endogenous BMC characteristics at baseline were found to be associated with a reduction in infarct size at 6 months after STEMI. Specifically, this study showed that patients with bone marrow containing a higher percentage of CD45+CD31low cells had larger reductions in infarct size. Additionally, patients with bone marrow containing cells that grew more rapidly in the CFU-Hill and the ECFC assays had larger reductions in infarct size. Thus, it may be more beneficial for patients to have favorable bone marrow activity than to artificially translocate regenerative cells into the injured myocardial tissue. These findings suggest that optimizing patient selection and improving cell product composition are important directions for future investigation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Heather Leibrecht, MS at the Texas Heart Institute for her assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Sources of Funding: UM1 HL087318-08 (CCTRN) and R01 HL091005-04 (Ancillary Studies), University of Florida

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACE

angiotensin-converting enzyme

BMC

bone marrow mononuclear cell

CCTRN

Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network

CFU-F

colony-forming unit fibroblast

CFU-Hill

colony-forming unit Hill

cMRI

cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

ECFC

endothelial-colony forming cell

FC

flow cytometric

ISHAGE

International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering

PCI

percutaneous coronary intervention

STEMI

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Footnotes

Disclosures: None.

References

  • 1.Velagaleti RS, Pencina MJ, Murabito JM, Wang TJ, Parikh NI, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Kannel WB, Vasan RS. Long-term trends in the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;118:2057–2062. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.784215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M, Sorel M, Selby JV, Go AS. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2155–2165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salem HK, Thiemermann C. Mesenchymal stromal cells: current understanding and clinical status. Stem Cells. 2010;28:585–596. doi: 10.1002/stem.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968;6:230–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH, Wijelath ES, Yu C, Ishida A, Fujita Y, Kothari S, Mohle R, Sauvage LR, Moore MA, Storb RF, Hammond WP. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998;92:362–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clifford DM, Fisher SA, Brunskill SJ, Doree C, Mathur A, Watt S, Martin-Rendon E. Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD006536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bello D, Einhorn A, Kaushal R, Kenchaiah S, Raney A, Fieno D, Narula J, Goldberger J, Shivkumar K, Subacius H, Kadish A. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: infarct size is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;29:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Traverse JH, Henry TD, Pepine CJ, et al. Effect of the use and timing of bone marrow mononuclear cell delivery on left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction: the TIME randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;308:2380–2389. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.28726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zierold C, Carlson MA, Obodo UC, et al. Developing mechanistic insights into cardiovascular cell therapy: Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network Biorepository Core Laboratory rationale. Am Heart J. 2011;162:973–980. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Traverse JH, Henry TD, Vaughan DE, et al. Rationale and design for TIME: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial evaluating the safety and effect of timing of administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2009;158:356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gee AP, Richman S, Durett A, et al. Multicenter cell processing for cardiovascular regenerative medicine applications: the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) experience. Cytotherapy. 2010;12:684–691. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.487900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother. 1996;5:213–226. doi: 10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:593–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoder MC, Mead LE, Prater D, Krier TR, Mroueh KN, Li F, Krasich R, Temm CJ, Prchal JT, Ingram DA. Redefining endothelial progenitor cells via clonal analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell principals. Blood. 2007;109:1801–1809. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-043471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fan M, Chen W, Liu W, Du GQ, Jiang SL, Tian WC, Sun L, Li RK, Tian H. The effect of age on the efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cell transplantation after a myocardial infarction. Rejuvenation Res. 2010;13:429–438. doi: 10.1089/rej.2009.0986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Linthout SV, Spillmann F, Schultheiss HP, Tschope C. Effects of mesenchymal stromal cells on diabetic cardiomyopathy. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:3341–3347. doi: 10.2174/138161211797904163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Konstam MA, Kronenberg MW, Rousseau MF, Udelson JE, Melin J, Stewart D, Dolan N, Edens TR, Ahn S, Kinan D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on the long-term progression of left ventricular dilatation in patients with asymptomatic systolic dysfunction. SOLVD (Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction) Investigators. Circulation. 1993;88:2277–2283. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pfeffer MA, Greaves SC, Arnold JM, Glynn RJ, LaMotte FS, Lee RT, Menapace FJ, Jr, Rapaport E, Ridker PM, Rouleau JL, Solomon SD, Hennekens CH. Early versus delayed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The healing and early afterload reducing therapy trial. Circulation. 1997;95:2643–2651. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.12.2643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suzuki R, Fukuda N, Katakawa M, Tsunemi A, Tahira Y, Matsumoto T, Ueno T, Soma M. Effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker on the impaired function of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:695–701. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Michaud SE, Dussault S, Haddad P, Groleau J, Rivard A. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells from healthy smokers exhibit impaired functional activities. Atherosclerosis. 2006;187:423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baumann CI, Bailey AS, Li W, Ferkowicz MJ, Yoder MC, Fleming WH. PECAM-1 is expressed on hematopoietic stem cells throughout ontogeny and identifies a population of erythroid progenitors. Blood. 2004;104:1010–1016. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Newman PJ. The biology of PECAM-1. J Clinical Invest. 1997;99:3. doi: 10.1172/JCI119129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee CW, Hwang I, Park CS, Lee H, Park DW, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Park SW, Park SJ. Differences in intravascular ultrasound and histological findings in culprit coronary plaques between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and stable angina. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014;37:443–449. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0975-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim H, Cho HJ, Kim SW, Liu B, Choi YJ, Lee J, Sohn YD, Lee MY, Houge MA, Yoon YS. CD31+ cells represent highly angiogenic and vasculogenic cells in bone marrow: novel role of nonendothelial CD31+ cells in neovascularization and their therapeutic effects on ischemic vascular disease. Circ Res. 2010;107:602–614. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.218396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kawamoto A, Tkebuchava T, Yamaguchi J, et al. Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization of myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:461–468. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000046450.89986.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Werner N, Kosiol S, Schiegl T, Ahlers P, Walenta K, Link A, Böhm M, Nickenig G. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:999–1007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Massa M, Campanelli R, Bonetti E, Ferrario M, Marinoni B, Rosti V. Rapid and large increase of the frequency of circulating endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) generating late outgrowth endothelial cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:8–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang L, Hou D, Thompson MA, Baysden SE, Shelley WC, Ingram DA, March KL, Yoder MC. Acute myocardial infarction in swine rapidly and selectively releases highly proliferative endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) into circulation. Cell Transplant. 2007;16:887–897. doi: 10.3727/096368907783338181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meneveau N, Deschaseaux F, Seronde MF, Chopard R, Schiele F, Jehl J, Tiberghien P, Bassand JP, Kantelip JP, Davani S. Presence of endothelial colony-forming cells is associated with reduced microvascular obstruction limiting infarct size and left ventricular remodelling in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol. 2011;106:1397–1410. doi: 10.1007/s00395-011-0220-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rohde E, Bartmann C, Schallmoser K, Reinisch A, Lanzer G, Linkesch W, Guelly C, Strunk D. Immune cells mimic the morphology of endothelial progenitor colonies in vitro. Stem Cells. 2007;25:1746–1752. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo JL, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med. 2007;204:3037–3047. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heil M, Ziegelhoeffer T, Pipp F, Kostin S, Martin S, Clauss M, Schaper W. Blood monocyte concentration is critical for enhancement of collateral artery growth. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;283:H2411–2419. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01098.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arras M, Ito WD, Scholz D, Winkler B, Schaper J, Schaper W. Monocyte activation in angiogenesis and collateral growth in the rabbit hindlimb. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:40–50. doi: 10.1172/JCI119877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS. The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970;3:393–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1970.tb00347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Heldman AW, DiFede DL, Fishman JE, et al. Transendocardial mesenchymal stem cells and mononuclear bone marrow cells for ischemic cardiomyopathy: The TAC-HFT randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:62–73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klose K, Roy R, Brodarac A, Kurtz A, Ode A, Kang KS, Bieback K, Choi YH, Stamm C. Impact of heart failure on the behavior of human neonatal stem cells in vitro. J Transl Med. 2013;11:236. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Neef K, Choi YH, Weichel A, Rahmanian PB, Liakopoulos OJ, Stamm C, Choi CY, Jacobshagen C, Wittwer T, Wahlers T. The influence of cardiovascular risk factors on bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell fitness. Cytotherapy. 2012;14:670–678. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2012.663483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mouquet F, Pfister O, Jain M, Oikonomopoulos A, Ngoy S, Summer R, Fine A, Liao R. Restoration of cardiac progenitor cells after myocardial infarction by self-proliferation and selective homing of bone marrow-derived stem cells. Circ Res. 2005;97:1090–1092. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000194330.66545.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sheikh AY, Lin SA, Cao F, Cao Y, van der Bogt KE, Chu P, Chang CP, Contag CH, Robbins RC, Wu JC. Molecular imaging of bone marrow mononuclear cell homing and engraftment in ischemic myocardium. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2677–2684. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu Y, Ip JE, Huang J, Zhang L, Matsushita K, Liew CC, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Essential role of ICAM-1/CD18 in mediating EPC recruitment, angiogenesis, and repair to the infarcted myocardium. Circ Res. 2006;99:315–322. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000235986.35957.a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Masci PG, Bogaert J. Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:113–127. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.04.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

304710R2 Online Data Supplement

RESOURCES