Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):141–145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.1.141

Origin of the foraminifera.

C G Wray 1, M R Langer 1, R DeSalle 1, J J Lee 1, J H Lipps 1
PMCID: PMC42833  PMID: 7816805

Abstract

We report nuclear small-subunit rDNA sequences for two species of the benthic foraminifer Ammonia. Because of their abundance in present and past seas, the foraminifera are a very important group of organisms used in a wide range of geologic studies; however, the ancestry of this group was, until now, unknown. Difficulties in purifying foraminiferal DNA and avoiding PCR contamination led us to develop DNA.DNA in situ hybridization techniques to verify our sequence data. Phylogenetic analysis of verified foraminiferal DNA sequence indicates these taxa are a divergent, "alveolate" lineage, within the major eukaryotic radiation. Our findings cast doubt upon the assumption that all foraminifera are derived from an amoebalike ancestor. Cytological features and the DNA sequences presented herein suggest that the foraminifera were derived from a heterokaryotic flagellated marine protist, probably sometime in the later Proterozoic.

Full text

PDF
141

Images in this article

143Fig. 2
on p.143

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bowser S. S., Rieder C. L. Evidence that cell surface motility in Allogromia is mediated by cytoplasmic microtubules. Can J Biochem Cell Biol. 1985 Jun;63(6):608–620. doi: 10.1139/o85-079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavalier-Smith T. Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla. Microbiol Rev. 1993 Dec;57(4):953–994. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.4.953-994.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Culver S. J. Early cambrian foraminifera from west Africa. Science. 1991 Nov 1;254(5032):689–691. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5032.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hinkle G., Sogin M. L. The evolution of the Vahlkampfiidae as deduced from 16S-like ribosomal RNA analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1993 Sep-Oct;40(5):599–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb06114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knoll A. H. The early evolution of eukaryotes: a geological perspective. Science. 1992 May 1;256(5057):622–627. doi: 10.1126/science.1585174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Orias E. On the evolution of the karyorelict ciliate life cycle: heterophasic ciliates and the origin of ciliate binary fission. Biosystems. 1991;25(1-2):67–73. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(91)90013-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Toneguzzo F., Glynn S., Levi E., Mjolsness S., Hayday A. Use of a chemically modified T7 DNA polymerase for manual and automated sequencing of supercoiled DNA. Biotechniques. 1988 May;6(5):460–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wainright P. O., Hinkle G., Sogin M. L., Stickel S. K. Monophyletic origins of the metazoa: an evolutionary link with fungi. Science. 1993 Apr 16;260(5106):340–342. doi: 10.1126/science.8469985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wolters J. The troublesome parasites--molecular and morphological evidence that Apicomplexa belong to the dinoflagellate-ciliate clade. Biosystems. 1991;25(1-2):75–83. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(91)90014-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES