Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2014 Nov 25;(457):227–238. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.457.6403

Embryo production in the sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp Synalpheus apioceros (Decapoda, Alpheidae) from Bocas del Toro, Panama

Adriana P Rebolledo 1, Ingo S Wehrtmann 1, Darryl L Felder 2, Fernando L Mantelatto 3
PMCID: PMC4283373  PMID: 25561839

Abstract Abstract

Caridean shrimps of the genus Synalpheus are abundant and widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, but knowledge of their reproductive biology remains scarce. We report reproductive traits of Synalpheus apioceros from Bocas del Toro, Panama, based on collections in August 2011. The 46 ovigerous females that were analyzed ranged in size from 3.8 to 7.4 mm in carapace length. Fecundity varied between 8 and 310 embryos and increased with female size. Females invested 18.6 ± 10.3% of their body weight in Embryo production. Embryo volume increased considerably (77.2%) during embryogenesis, likely representing water uptake near the end of incubation period. Compared to Synalpheus species with abbreviated or direct development, Synalpheus apioceros produced substantially smaller embryos; however, Synalpheus apioceros seems to have a prolonged larval phase with at least five zoeal stages, which may explain the combination of relatively small and numerous embryos. We did not find nonviable, minute, chalky embryos, previously reported for Synalpheus apioceros specimens obtained from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, which supports the hypothesis that the production of this type of embryos may be a physiological response of this warm-water species to the temperature decrease near to its latitudinal range limit.

Keywords: Central America, embryo volume, fecundity, incubation period, reproductive output, water uptake

Introduction

Reproductive traits of crustacean species offer relevant information about their life history strategies (Sastry 1983, Ramirez-Llodra 2002). Fecundity, defined as the number of offspring produced by a female in a determined time period, is directly related to energy allocation and is essential in estimating reproductive potential of a population (Ramirez-Llodra 2002, Zare et al. 2011). Embryo size is an indicator of the energy allocation, duration of embryogenesis and type of larval development (Dardeau 1984, Ramirez-Llodra 2002). The reproductive output quantifies the energetic investment of a species in embryo production (Hines 1991, Anger and Moreira 1998).

Caridean shrimps of the genus Synalpheus are distributed worldwide with estimates of about 150 valid species (Dardeau 1984, Ríos and Duffy 2007, Macdonald et al. 2009, Hermoso-Salazar and Solis-Weiss 2010, Hultgren et al. 2010, 2011, De Grave and Fransen 2011, Anker et al. 2012). Whether free-living or (more typically) living as facultative or obligate symbionts, these pistol or snapping shrimps commonly inhabit sponge cavities, coral reefs, rocks, grass beds, or tide pools, and may live associated with hard or soft corals, ascidians, bryozoans, and crinoids (Corey and Reid 1991, Ríos and Duffy 2007, Macdonald et al. 2009, Anker et al. 2012).

Most studies on this genus have focused on geographical distribution (Hermoso-Salazar and Hendrickx 2005a, Macdonald et al. 2009, Bacci et al. 2010, Hultgren et al. 2011), taxonomy and species revision (Duffy 1996a, Ríos and Duffy 1999, Hermoso-Salazar et al. 2005, Hermoso-Salazar and Hendrickx 2005a,b, Macdonald and Duffy 2006, Anker and Toth 2008, Anker et al. 2012), phylogenetics (Morrison et al. 2004, Hultgren and Duffy 2011), or behavior and eusociality (Duffy 1996b,1998, Duffy and Macdonald 1999, Duffy et al. 2000, 2002). Despite the large amount of information accumulated about these interesting snapping shrimps, little is known about their reproductive ecology. Corey and Reid (1991) provided some data on the fecundity of six species of Synalpheus, and Hernáez et al. (2010) described reproductive features and the effect of bopyrid parasitism on embryo production in Synalpheus yano Rios & Duffy. Dobkin (1969) studied the larval development of Synalpheus apioceros Coutière and concluded that this species has a prolonged larval phase. The only published study regarding embryo production of Synalpheus apioceros mentioned the presence of anomalous small embryos and described the pattern of seasonality of ovigerous females from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico but did not address fecundity (Felder 1982).

Synalpheus apioceros is widely distributed in the western Atlantic (Gulf of Mexico; Florida; Bahamas), throughout the Caribbean Sea (e.g., Panama, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Venezuela etc.), Suriname, and Brazil (Amapá to Santa Catarina). Assuming that we are dealing with a single species, it can be found in association with different hosts (see Anker et al. 2012 for revision). The species thus represents an excellent candidate in to study reproductive adaptations of those Synalpheus spp. that typically live in heterosexual pairs but with a variety of hosts. The present study addresses reproduction in Synalpheus apioceros by describing fecundity, reproductive output, volume and water content of the embryos at different embryonic stages for a tropical Caribbean population.

Methods

Ovigerous females of Synalpheus apioceros were collected by hand (August 2011) from an area near the (STRI) marine station (09°20'N, 82°14'W), at Bocas del Toro, on the Caribbean coast of Panama. Shrimps were found in the red-orange sponge Lissodendoryx colombiensis Zea & van Soest, growing on jetty pilings and mangrove roots. In the laboratory, ovigerous females were extracted from the sponge canals and stored individually to avoid mixing and loss of the embryos and then preserved in ethanol (70%). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Crustacean Collection of the (MZUCR) under catalog number MZUCR 3128-01.

(CL) of ovigerous females was measured (± 0.1 mm) under a stereomicroscope with an ocular micrometer, from the tip of the rostrum to the posterior margin of the carapace. The entire embryo mass from each female was detached from the pleopods and embryos were classified into three stages (I–III) according to the shape and development of the abdomen and eyes (Wehrtmann 1990): Stage I: almost round embryo, uniform yolk, no visible eye pigments; Stage II: ovoid embryo, eye pigments barely visible; Stage III: ovoid embryo, eye fully developed, abdomen free.

Ten embryos of each female were randomly selected to measure the length (a) and width (b) under a stereomicroscope equipped with an ocular micrometer; these data were used to determined the (EV) with the formula EV = 1/6×a×b2×π (Turner and Laurence 1979). The (WW) of the embryo mass was determined with an analytical balance and the embryos then oven-dried at 60 °C for 24 hours to obtain (EDW). Embryo water content was calculated by subtracting EDW from WW.

Due to possible embryo loss during the incubation period (Terossi et al. 2010), only females carrying recently-produced embryos (Stage I) were used to estimate fecundity and (RO). Fecundity was considered as the total number of embryos present on each individual. The (FDW) carrying Stage I embryos was obtained to calculated the RO applying de formula proposed by Clarke et al. (1991): RO = EDW(Stage I)/FDW.

Data were analyzed with the statistical software SPSS v.20.0. The assumption of normality on the size distribution of the individuals was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Linear regressions and Pearson’s correlation analyses were applied to determine the relation between CL and fecundity, and CL and RO. One-way Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) were used to compare embryo volume and water content among the three stages of development.

Results

A total of 46 ovigerous females were analyzed; the majority of them (21 total or 45.7%) carried embryos at Stage I, 10 (21.7%) in Stage II and 15 females (32.6%) in Stage III. The size frequency distribution was normal (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, KS = 0.11, p > 0.05). The mean CL of the individuals was 5.4 ± 0.8 mm, ranging from 3.8 to 7.4 mm, and 43.5% of the ovigerous females were in the intermediate size class of 5.0–5.9 mm (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Frequency distribution of carapace length of ovigerous females of Synalpheus apioceros (N = 46), Bocas del Toro, Panama.

Fecundity in Stage I ranged from 8 to 310, and increased with female size (Pearson’s correlation, r = 0.68, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Females within the same size-class presented different number of embryos (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Energy invested in embryo production by the females was not related to female size (Pearson’s correlation, r = 0.26, p > 0.05). The embryo mass comprised on average 18.6 ± 10.3% (4.8–40.1%) of the dry body weight of the females.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Relation between carapace length and fecundity of Synalpheus apioceros females carrying stage I embryos, Bocas del Toro, Panama.

Table 1.

Fecundity by size class in females carrying recently-produced embryos (Stage I) for Synalpheus apioceros, Bocas del Toro, Panama.

Size class (mm) Mean embryos number
4.0–4.9 (N = 6) 34.8 ± 28.5
5.0–5.9 (N = 10) 88.6 ± 49.6
6.0–6.9 (N = 4) 184.8 ± 103.8
7.0–7.9 (N = 1) 220
Open in a new tab

Embryos were slightly oval with mean diameters ranging from 0.63 ± 0.04 mm (Stage I) to 0.77 ± 0.06 mm (Stage III). Embryo volume differed significantly (ANOVA, F = 369.25, p < 0.05) between the stages of development, with an overall volume increase during the incubation period of 77.2% (Table 2). During the embryogenesis, the water content increased substantially (ANOVA, F = 82.60, p < 0.05) from Stage I (59.0 ± 5.9%) to Stage III (82.9 ± 3.6%). Dry mass remained almost constant throughout the incubation period (ANOVA, F = 0.10, p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Embryo volume, weight, and water content of different embryonic development stages of Synalpheus apioceros, Bocas del Toro, Panama.

Embryo features Stage I (N = 20) Stage II (N = 8) Stage III (N = 9)
Embryo volume (mm3) 0.101 ± 0.015 0.136 ± 0.018 0.179 ± 0.034
Wet weight (µg) 74.0 ± 12.5 128.2 ± 10.5 173.9 ± 19.8
Dry weight (µg) 30.1 ± 5.3 29.8 ± 1.5 29.3 ± 5.2
Water content (µg) 43.9 ± 10.0 98.4 ± 9.4 144.6 ± 21.0
% Water content 59.0 ± 5.9 76.6 ± 2.0 82.9 ± 3.6
Open in a new tab

Discussion

The size of ovigerous females of Synalpheus apioceros from Bocas del Toro is within the range for congeneric species (Table 3). Fecundity in Synalpheus apioceros increased with female size, which is in agreement with similar observations from other caridean shrimp (Corey and Reid 1991, Anger and Moreira 1998, Lara and Wehrtmann 2009). Female size is postulated to determine the number of embryos produced by the individual, as larger females have more space available for the attachment of embryos on their pleopods (Lara and Wehrtmann 2009).

Table 3.

Mean carapace length, embryo number, and embryo volume for ten species of sponge-dwelling Synalpheus.

Species N Carapace length (mm) Embryo number Embryo volume (mm3) Reference
Synalpheus agelas 5 5.0
(4.2–5.6)		 42.4
(16–65)		 0.23 Corey and Reid (1991)
Synalpheus brooksi 10 3.9
(3.4–4.5)		 5.8
(3-11)		 0.50
Synalpheus fritzmuelleri 13 4.9
(3.8–6.5)		 173.4
(39–484)		 0.09
Synalpheus herricki 4 4.5
(3.5–5.12)		 45.8
(11–81)		 0.22
Synalpheus longicarpus 21 6.9
(5.5–8.0)		 195.4
(27–349)		 0.17
Synalpheus pectiniger 31 4.2
(3.5–4.6)		 9.9
(4–17)		 0.75
Synalpheus chacei 2 3.7 16 0.15 Hernáez et al. (2010)
Synalpheus idios 4 3.9 ± 0.2
(3.7–4.2)		 12.0 ± 4.3
(9–18)		 1.04 ± 0.23
(0.70–1.20)
Synalpheus yano 84 5.6 ± 1.2
(3.7–9.6)		 98.0 ± 64.6
(6–246)		 0.15 ± 0.08
(0.06–0.51)
Synalpheus apioceros 46 5.4 ± 0.8
(3.8–7.4)		 97.8 ± 80.1
(8–310)
N = 21
(Stage I)		 0.13 ± 0.04
(0.07–0.24)
N = 37		 Present study
Open in a new tab

Fecundity variation within the same size class is a well-known phenomenon in decapods, including alpheid shrimps (Lardies and Wehrtmann 1997, 2001, Pavanelli et al. 2008). Such variability as observed in Synalpheus apioceros could be due to multiple spawnings during a single reproductive season (Miranda et al. 2006, Mantelatto et al. 2007). Also, the presence of primiparous females, which tend to produce fewer embryos than multiparous ones (Somerton and Meyers 1983, Mantelatto et al. 2007) could explain the variability of embryo number within the same size class.

The energy invested in embryo production, estimated by reproductive output (RO), was not related to their size in Synalpheus apioceros. Average RO in alpheid shrimp is highly variable, ranging from 7 to 35% (Lardies and Wehrtmann 1997, 2001, Pavanelli et al. 2008, 2010, Hernáez et al. 2010). Although the RO of Synalpheus apioceros is lower (18.6%) than that reported for another tropical sponge-dweller, Synalpheus yano (35%: Hernáez et al. 2010), it is higher than that observed in other subtropical alpheid species (Pavanelli et al. 2008, 2010). The elevated RO values in sponge-dwelling alpheids may represent an adaptation to their life style: the relatively protected habitat may favor energy investment in embryo production, which also favors enhanced larval production and thus probability of recolonization in niches restricted to certain hosts. This interpretation is supported by studies on pinnotherid crabs living in different hosts, which showed extremely high RO values (Pinnotheres ostreum Say: 66%; Fabia subquadrata Dana: 97%; Hines 1992). Thus, it might be postulated that decapod species living associated with other organisms generally have a higher RO than free-living species, a pattern warranting additional studies.

The embryo volume in Synalpheus apioceros is within the range reported for other alpheid shrimp (Corey and Reid 1991, Lardies and Wehrtmann 1997, Pavanelli et al. 2008, 2010, Hernáez et al. 2010). Several other species of Synalpheus produce substantially larger embryos than does Synalpheus apioceros (see Corey and Reid 1991), but these species have an abbreviated or direct development. In contrast, Synalpheus apioceros seems to have a prolonged larval phase with at least five zoeal stages (Dobkin 1969), which may explain the presence of relatively small and numerous embryos.

Felder (1982) studied reproductive features of Synalpheus apioceros in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico (26°49.0'N, 97°19.3'W), close to the northern limit of the geographical distribution range of the species. He reported the presence of nonviable, minute, chalky embryos, and suggested that the production of this type of embryos may be a physiological response of this warm-water species to the temperature decrease near to its latitudinal range limit. This hypothesis is perhaps supported by the present data, because we did not detect in any of the females examined herein this type of minute embryos. We propose that laboratory experiments with Synalpheus apioceros be conducted to determine if lowered maintenance temperatures can provoke the production of these nonviable, minute embryos and if higher temperatures can alternatively eliminate their occurrence. Should ongoing elevation of temperatures in northern extremes of range for these tropical decapods reduce production of non-viable embryos, and thus enhance effective fecundity, this could reveal an underappreciated dynamic of coastal ocean warming.

Embryo volume of Synalpheus apioceros increased considerably (77.2%) during the incubation period. This is a common phenomenon in decapod species and is probably related to water uptake over the course of embryogenesis (Lardies and Wehrtmann 1997, Petersen and Anger 1997, Wehrtmann and Lardies 1999, Lara and Wehrtmann 2009), as also observed incrementally in Synalpheus apioceros (Table 2). At the end of the incubation period, the embryo starts to swell due to osmotic changes (Figueiredo et al. 2008), while the embryo membrane shows a decrease in thickness with a concomitant increase in elasticity, thus favoring the hatching process of the embryo (Davis 1981).

While we here provide novel information on reproduction in the sponge-dwelling alpheid shrimp Synalpheus apioceros, it is based on a limited sampling period and a single locality. We thus regard our work to date as a starting point from which we and others might build comparative studies. Conspecific populations can be readily sampled across latitudes and temperature regimes, as well as over varied seasons, applying the methods we have used and enabling comparative analyses. Such work can both reveal life history strategies that have evolved in these host-dependent shrimp species and shed light on what ranges of reproductive variability might be expected due to environmental interactions in this era of global coastal ocean change.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI), Panama for support to APR, DLF, and FLM covering their travel to Panamá and use of facilities during a workshop on crustacean biology and taxonomy. Special thanks are due to Rachel Collin (Director of the Bocas del Toro Laboratory, STRI), who assisted with logistics, and Jenny Felder for her enthusiastic help during both field and laboratory activities, and all other participating students, assistants, and STRI staff involved in the course hosted at the Bocas del Toro Research Station from July 31 to August 15, 2011. Partial support was provided by research grants NSF/RAPID DEB 1045690 and GoMRI-112-8 to DLF. This is contribution number 166 of the University of Louisiana’s Laboratory for Crustacean Research.

Citation

Rebolledo AP, Wehrtmann IS, Felder DL, Mantelatto FL (2014) Embryo production in the sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp Synalpheus apioceros (Decapoda, Alpheidae) from Bocas del Toro, Panama. In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 227–238. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.457.6403

References

  1. Anger K, Moreira GS. (1998) Morphometric and reproductive traits of tropical caridean shrimps. Journal of Crustacean Biology 18: 823–838. doi: 10.2307/1549156 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anker A, Toth E. (2008) A preliminary revision of the Synalpheus paraneptunus Coutiére, 1909 species complex (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). Zootaxa 1915: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anker A, Pachelle PPG, De Grave S, Hultgren KM. (2012) Taxonomic and biological notes on some Atlantic species of the snapping shrimp genus Synalpheus Spence Bate, 1888 (Decapoda, Alpheidae). Zootaxa 3598: 1–96. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bacci T, Marusso V, Trabucco B, Magaletti E. (2010) First record of Synalpheus tumidomanus africanus (Crosnier Forest, 1965) (Caridea, Alpheidae) in Italian Waters. Crustaceana 83: 821–827. doi: 10.1163/001121610X502939 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke A, Hopkins CCE, Nilssen EM. (1991) Egg size and reproductive output in the deep-water prawn Pandalus borealis Kroyer, 1838. Functional Ecology 5: 724–730. doi: 10.2307/2389534 [Google Scholar]
  6. Corey S, Reid DM. (1991) Comparative fecundity of decapods crustaceans. The fecundity of thirty three species of nine families of caridean shrimps. Crustaceana 60: 270–294. doi: 10.1163/156854091X00056 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dardeau MR. (1984) Synalpheus shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). I. The Gambarelloides group, with a description of a new species. Memoirs of the Hourglass Cruises 8: 1–125. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis CC. (1981) Mechanisms of hatching in aquatic invertebrate eggs. II. Oceanography and Marine Biology An Annual Review 19: 95–123. [Google Scholar]
  9. De Grave S, Fransen CHJM. (2011) Carideorum catalogus: the recent species of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoologische Mededelingen Leiden 89: 195–589. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dobkin S. (1969) Abbreviated larval development in caridean shrimps and its significance in the artificial culture of these animals. FAO Fisheries Reports 57: 935–945. [Google Scholar]
  11. Duffy JE. (1996a) Synalpheus regalis, new species, a sponge-dwelling shrimp from the Belize Barrier Reef, with comments on host specificity in Synalpheus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 16: 564–573. doi: 10.2307/1548748 [Google Scholar]
  12. Duffy JE. (1996b) Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp. Nature 381: 512–514. doi: 10.1038/381512a0 [Google Scholar]
  13. Duffy JE. (1998) On the frequency of eusociality in snapping shrimps (Decapoda: Alpheidae), with description of a second eusocial species. Bulletin of Marine Science 63: 387–400. [Google Scholar]
  14. Duffy JE, Macdonald KS. (1999) Colony structure of the social snapping shrimp, Synalpheus filidigitus, in Belize. Journal of Crustacean Biology 19: 283–292. doi: 10.2307/1549235 [Google Scholar]
  15. Duffy JE, Morrison CL, Ríos R. (2000) Multiple origins of eusociality among sponge-dwelling shrimps (Synalpheus). Evolution 54: 503–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duffy JE, Morrison CL, Macdonald KS. (2002) Colony defense and behavioral differentiation in the eusocial shrimp Synalpheus regalis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobioly 51: 488–495. doi: 10.1007/s00265-002-0455-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Felder DL. (1982) Reproduction of the snapping shrimps Synalpheus fritzmuelleri and S. apioceros (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae) on a sublittoral reef off Texas. Journal of Crustacean Biology 2: 535–543. doi: 10.2307/1548093 [Google Scholar]
  18. Figueiredo J, Pehna-Lopes J, Anto J, Narciso L, Lin J. (2008) Potential fertility and egg development (volume, water, lipid, and fatty acid content) through embryogenesis of Uca rapax (Decapoda: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 28: 528–533. doi: 10.1651/07-2937R.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hermoso-Salazar M, Hendrickx ME. (2005a) New Records for Synalpheus peruvianus Rathbun, 1910 (Decapoda, Caridea, Alpheidae) in the East Pacific. Crustaceana 78: 763–765. doi: 10.1163/156854005774353449 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hermoso-Salazar M, Hendrickx ME. (2005b) Two new species of Synalpheus Bate, 1888 (Decapoda, Caridea, Alpheidae) from the SE Gulf of California, Mexico. Crustaceana 78: 1099–1116. doi: 10.1163/156854005775361061 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hermoso-Salazar M, Wicksten M, Morrone JJ. (2005) Redescriptions and taxonomic notes on species of the Synalpheus townsendi Coutière, 1909 complex (Decapoda: Caridea: Alpheidae). Zootaxa 1027: 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hermoso-Salazar M, Solis-Weiss, V. (2010) Distribution and morphological variation of Synalpheus superus Abele and Kim, 1989 and notes on the distribution of S. fritzmuelleri Coutière, 1909 (Decapoda: Caridea: Alpheidae). Zootaxa 2505: 65–68. doi: 10.1017/S0025315409991093 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hernáez P, Martínez-Guerrero B, Anker K, Wehrtmann IS. (2010) Fecundity and effects of bopyrid infestation on egg production in the Caribbean sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp Synalpheus yano (Decapoda: Alpheidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90: 691–698. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hines AH. (1991) Fecundity and reproductive output in nine species of Cancer crabs (Crustacea, Brachyura, Cancridae). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 267–275. doi: 10.1139/f91-037 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hines AH. (1992) Constraint on reproductive output in brachyuran crabs: pinnotherids test the rule. American Zoologist 32: 503–511. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hultgren KM, Duffy JE. (2011) Multi-locus phylogeny of sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Caridea: Alpheidae: Synalpheus) supports morphology-based species concepts. Journal of Crustacean Biology 31: 356–364. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hultgren KM, MacDonald III KS, Duffy JE. (2010) Sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps of Curaçao, with descriptions of three new species. Zootaxa 2372: 221–262. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hultgren KM, MacDonald III KS, Duffy JE. (2011) Sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Alpheidae: Synalpheus) of Barbados, West Indies, with a description of a new eusocial species. Zootaxa 2834: 1–16. doi: 10.1651/10-3382.1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lara, R, Wehrtmann IS. (2009) Reproductive biology of the freshwater shrimp Macrobrachium carcinus (L.) (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Costa Rica, Central America. Journal of Crustacean Biology 29: 343–349. doi: 10.1651/08-3109.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lardies M, Wehrtmann IS. (1997) Egg production in Betaeus emarginatus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) (Decapoda: Alpheidae): Fecundity, reproductive output and chemical composition of eggs. Ophelia 46: 165–174. doi: 10.1080/00785326.1997.10432582 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lardies M, Wehrtmann IS. (2001) Latitudinal variation in the reproductive biology of Betaeus truncatus (Decapoda: Alpheidae) along the Chilean coast. Ophelia 55: 55–67. doi: 10.1080/00785236.2001.10409473 [Google Scholar]
  32. Macdonald KS, Duffy JE. (2006) Two new species of sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp from the Belizean barrier reef, with a synopsis of the Synalpheus brooksi species complex. American Museum Novitate 3543: 1–22. doi: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3543[1:TNSOSS]2.0.CO;2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Macdonald KS, Hultgren K, Duffy JE. (2009) The sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda, Alpheidae, Synalpheus) of Discovery Bay, Jamaica, with descriptions of four new species. Zootaxa 2199: 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mantelatto FL, Faria FCR, Iossi CL, Biagi R. (2007) Population and reproductive features of the western Atlantic hermit crab Pagurus criniticornis (Anomura, Paguridae) from Anchieta Island, southeastern Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 97: 314–320. doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212007000300016 [Google Scholar]
  35. Miranda I, Meireles AL, Biagi R, Mantelatto FL. (2006) Is the abundance of the red brocade hermit crab Dardanus insignis (Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae) in the infralittoral region of southern Brazil determined by reproductive potential? Crustacean Research 6: 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  36. Morrison CL, Rios R, Duffy JE. (2004) Phylogenetic evidence for an ancient rapid radiation of Caribbean sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Synalpheus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 563–581. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00252-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pavanelli CA, Mossolin EC, Mantelatto FL. (2008) Reproductive strategy of the snapping shrimp Alpheus armillatus H. Milne-Edwards, 1837 in the South Atlantic: fecundity, egg features, and reproductive output. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 52: 123–130. doi: 10.1080/07924259.2008.9652280 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pavanelli C, Mossolin EC, Mantelatto FL. (2010) Maternal investment in egg production: environmental and population-specific effects on offspring performance in the snapping shrimp Alpheus nuttingi (Schmitt, 1924) (Decapoda, Alpheidae). Animal Biology 60: 237–247. doi: 10.1163/157075610X516466 [Google Scholar]
  39. Petersen S, Anger K. (1997) Chemical and physiological changes during the embryonic development of the spider crab, Hyas araneus L. (Decapoda: Majidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 117: 299–306. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0491(97)00091-6 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ramirez-Llodra E. (2002) Fecundity and life-history strategies in marine invertebrates. Advances in Marine Biology 43: 88–172. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(02)43004-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ríos R, Duffy JE. (1999) Description of Synalpheus williamsi, a new species of sponge-dwelling shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae), with remarks on its first larval stage. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 112: 541–552. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ríos R, Duffy JE. (2007) A review of the sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp from Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, with description of Zuzalpheus, new genus, and six new species (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). Zootaxa 1602: 1–89. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sastry AN. (1983) Pelagic larval ecology and development. The Biology of Crustacea 7: 213–282. doi: 10.2307/1548254 [Google Scholar]
  44. Somerton DA, Meyers WS. (1983) Fecundity differences between primiparous and multiparous female Alaskan tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi). Journal of Crustacean Biology 3: 183–186. [Google Scholar]
  45. Terossi M, Cuesta JA, Wehrtmann IS, Mantelatto FL. (2010) Revision of the larval morphology (Zoea I) of the family Hippolytidae (Decapoda, Caridea), with a description of the first stage of the shrimp Hippolyte obliquimanus Dana, 1852. Zootaxa 2624: 49–66. [Google Scholar]
  46. Turner RL, Lawrence JM. (1979) Volume and composition of echinoderm eggs: implications for the use of egg size in life history models. In: Stancyk SE. (Ed.) Reproductive Ecology of Marine Invertebrates. The Belle W. Baruch Library of Marine Science, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, NY, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wehrtmann IS. (1990) Distribution and reproduction of Ambidexter panamense and Palaemonetes schmitti in Pacific Costa Rica (Crustacea, Decapoda). Revista de Biología Tropical 38: 327–329. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wehrtmann IS, Lardies M. (1999) Egg production of Austropandalus grayi (Decapoda, Caridea, Pandalidae) from the Magellan region, South America. Scientia Marina 63: 325–331. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zare P, Naderi M, Eshghic H, Anastasiadoud C. (2011) Reproductive traits of the freshwater shrimp Caridina fossarum Heller, 1862 (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) in the Ghomp-Atashkedeh spring (Iran). Limnologica 41: 244–248. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2010.11.003 [Google Scholar]

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES