Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1563–1564. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000274

The Intoxicated ICU Patient: Another Opportunity to Improve Long-Term Outcomes

Brendan James Clark 1, Ingrid A Binswanger 2, Marc Moss 3
PMCID: PMC4283477  NIHMSID: NIHMS605323  PMID: 24836800

For more than a decade, the horizon of critical care research has extended beyond the walls of the intensive care unit (ICU) to understand and improve the long-term outcomes of ICU survivors (1). However, despite accounting for up to 14% of ICU admissions (2), little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients admitted with an acute intoxication. Without research quantifying long term outcomes, there is little to drive improvements in clinical practice or standards against which to measure the success of future interventions.

In a large epidemiologic study of over 7000 patients admitted to 81 ICUs in the Netherlands for an acute intoxication, Brandenburg and colleagues describe the proportion of patients who died up to two years after admission (3). At first glance, these patients seem to fare well. Similar to prior studies, the ICU mortality was 1.2% and in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% (4, 5). These low mortality rates are not surprising. The young age (mean age 42 years) and lack of medical comorbidities of intoxicated patients suggest that most patients are able to survive a significant acute physiological insult and emerge seemingly unscathed. However, this young and otherwise healthy group of patients had a substantial risk for death following hospital discharge, with 9.2% of the overall population dying by 24 months. Patients admitted for “street drug” intoxications had an even higher proportion dying by two years (12.3%). These findings are consistent with the prior observation that mortality rates for intoxicated patients 5 years following hospital discharge are more than 6 times that of the general population (6).

While the findings by Brandenburg and colleagues provide a firm foundation to understand the long-term outcomes of acutely intoxicated patients, several research gaps remain to help guide clinical care. First, greater uniformity in how substances leading to acute intoxication are classified would help researchers and clinicians interpret epidemiologic findings in light of regional drug use patterns. For instance, it is not clear if pharmaceutical opioids were classified as street drugs, analgesics, or another toxin in the schema outlined by the APACHE IV subgroups.

Second, for specific substances, it would be helpful to understand the timing of death relative to hospital discharge. For pharmaceutical opioids and heroin, the risk of overdose may be particularly high if an enforced period of abstinence, such as hospitalization (7), leads to loss of tolerance with subsequent resumption of use. A similar phenomenon has been described in people recently released from prison. In the first weeks following release from prison, the risk of death from drug overdose is more than 100 times that of the general population (8, 9).

Third, there is little available information about the long-term morbidity experienced by this population. In a similarly young cohort without medical comorbidities, 4% of patients admitted to the ICU with alcohol withdrawal died within a year of hospital discharge while 40% were rehospitalized (10). Defining rates of rehospitalization for intoxicated patients may provide an opportunity to engage hospital systems and garner resources to improve outcomes. Engaging hospital systems to invest in improving long-term outcomes is particularly important in countries where patients have limited access to long-term mental health care and treatment.

Fourth, understanding the modifiable predictors of long-term outcomes for intoxicated patients admitted to the ICU could suggest how to focus care following hospital discharge. Suicide attempts and drug use are responsible for over 90% of ICU admissions for intoxication (11). Therefore, substance use disorders, other psychiatric diagnoses (such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder), or both are likely to be the underlying cause of intoxication. Prior studies demonstrate that ICU survivors with a dual diagnosis – an alcohol or substance use disorder plus another psychiatric diagnosis - are at the highest risk of recurrent morbidity and mortality following hospital discharge (10). Understanding whether these findings extend to patients admitted to the ICU with an acute intoxication may help identify those patients at highest risk of poor outcomes and, thus, focus resources following hospital discharge.

Finally, more research is needed to determine how the multidisciplinary ICU team can best engage and support patients who survive an ICU admission for intoxication. Historically, critical care providers may have seen their clinical roles as limited to stabilizing the patient, administering an antidote, and providing supportive care (12). However, the findings by Brandenburg and colleagues suggest that an ICU admission is a sentinel event. An efficient and effective system is needed to seize the brief moment of opportunity afforded by an ICU admission. In order to construct such a system, future work may focus on understanding patients’ needs, what outcomes are important to them, barriers to engaging in longitudinal health care, and patients’ motivation to improve the outcomes that are important to them. Driven by a more detailed understanding of these issues, an effective system would then be able to tailor and execute a plan for each individual. For instance, providing overdose education and naloxone for take-home use may help reduce the risk of future ICU admissions for patients with an opioid use disorder while engaging them in meaningful conversations about their risk.

Caerus, the Greek god of opportunity, was often pictured holding a razor to highlight the razor thin nature of the moments in which opportunity approaches and passes. Acutely intoxicated patients enter the ICU in a moment of crisis. Fortunately, for the vast majority of these patients, this crisis will pass. More focused attention on what happens beyond the walls of the ICU could allow critical care providers to partner with patients and outpatient providers to seize the opportunity provided by ICU admission to improve long-term outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Copyright form disclosures:

Dr. Clark received support for article research from NIH. His institution received grant support from National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Dr. Binswanger received grant support from NIH (Support on several NIH grants, including an R34, R21 and R01. She is a co-I on an pending R01), consulted for UpToDate (Update “Clinical care for the incarcerated” chapter), is an unpaid board member of Friends of the Haven and CEDAS USA, and received support for article research from NIH (R34 DA035952). Her institution received grant support from NIH (R34 DA035952) and consulted for American College of Physicians (Editorial work: PIER “Opioid Abuse”) and THE CENTER FOR PERSONALIZED EDUCATION FOR PHYSICIANS (Clinical review for physician education). Dr. Moss received support for article research from NIH. His institution received grant support from NIH.

Contributor Information

Brendan James Clark, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora.

Ingrid A Binswanger, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Denver.

Marc Moss, Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver.

References

  • 1.Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):683–93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Henderson A, Wright M, Pond SM. Experience with 732 acute overdose patients admitted to an intensive care unit over six years. Med J Aust. 1993;158(1):28–30. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brandenburg R, Brinkman S, de Keizer NF, et al. In-hospital Mortality and Long-term Survival of Patients with Acute Intoxication Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med. 2014 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000245. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lam SM, Lau AC, Yan WW. Over 8 years experience on severe acute poisoning requiring intensive care in Hong Kong, China. Human & Experimental Toxicology. 2010;29(9):757–65. doi: 10.1177/0960327110361753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liisanantti JH, Ohtonen P, Kiviniemi O, et al. Risk factors for prolonged intensive care unit stay and hospital mortality in acute drug-poisoned patients: an evaluation of the physiologic and laboratory parameters on admission. J Crit Care. 2011;26(2):160–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Niskanen M, Kari A, Halonen P. Five-year survival after intensive care--comparison of 12,180 patients with the general population. Finnish ICU Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(12):1962–7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Merrall EL, Bird SM, Hutchinson SJ. A record-linkage study of drug-related death and suicide after hospital discharge among drug-treatment clients in Scotland, 1996–2006. Addiction. 2013;108(2):377–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Binswanger IA, Blatchford PJ, Mueller SR, Stern MF. Mortality after prison release: opioid overdose and other causes of death, risk factors, and time trends from 1999 to 2009. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(9):592–600. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-9-201311050-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA, et al. Release from prison--a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(2):157–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clark BJ, Keniston A, Douglas IS, et al. Healthcare utilization in medical intensive care unit survivors with alcohol withdrawal. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37(9):1536–43. doi: 10.1111/acer.12124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kristinsson J, Palsson R, Gudjonsdottir GA, et al. Acute poisonings in Iceland: a prospective nationwide study. Clin Toxicol. 2008;46(2):126–32. doi: 10.1080/15563650701438268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heyerdahl F, Bjornas MA, Hovda KE, et al. Acute poisonings treated in hospitals in Oslo: a one-year prospective study (II): clinical outcome. Clin Toxicol. 2008;46(1):42–9. doi: 10.1080/15563650701210048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES