Abstract
Background
Estimates of the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Germany range from 1.9% to 13.2%, depending on the population studied and the investigative methods used. About 30% of all patients already have severe airway obstruction by the time the condition is diagnosed.
Methods
Review of pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search, including current guidelines and textbooks.
Results
Smoking is the main risk factor for COPD. The diagnosis is based on characteristic symptoms that patients at risk should be actively asked about—cough, dyspnea, diminished physical reserve, and frequent airway infections—together with abnormal pulmonary function tests. Spirometry usually suffices to document impaired air flow. The clinical evaluation and the treatment strategy are based on the severity of airway obstruction and dyspnea, and the frequency of exacerbations. According to a European study, dyspnea is present in 73% of persons with severe COPD, expectoration in 64%, cough in 59%, and wheezing in 42%. Asthma, congestive heart failure, and interstitial lung disease are the main differential diagnoses.
Conclusion
COPD may begin with symptoms that are only mild at first even in a longstanding smoker. The available diagnostic techniques need better prospective validation with respect to relevant endpoints, including mortality, symptom progression, quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations.
Among all chronic diseases of the lungs, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has the highest mortality worldwide (1) and also accounts for the greatest number of years lived with disability (2). In the official German cause-of-death statistics, COPD (ICD-10 code J44.-) took 9th place in 1998, just after lung cancer; by 2012, it had risen to 5th place, with 26 654 deaths in that year (e1).
The term COPD arose historically from the fusion of two disease entities that were previously considered separate: pulmonary emphysema and chronic (obstructive) bronchitis. These two conditions were combined in a single, clinically and functionally defined entity because they are often present simultaneously and cannot be satisfactorily distinguished from another on clinical grounds (3, 4). The characteristic clinical features of COPD are respiratory symptoms such as cough or dyspnea in association with a pharmacologically irreversible, or minimally reversible, airway obstruction that progresses over time (with a mean annual decline of 33–69 mL in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]) (5, e2). COPD is characterized by exacerbations, which tend to arise about once per year (6). Only 23% of all patients with moderate or severe obstruction remain free of exacerbations for three years (7).
It has often been observed that COPD is both underdiagnosed and usually diagnosed too late (8, e3). A desire to do better in these respects was one of the main reasons for the introduction of a Disease Management Program (DMP) for asthma and COPD in Germany in 2006/2007.
Definition.
COPD is a functionally defined obstructive disease of the respiratory system that encompasses two previously separate entities: chronic obstructive bronchitis and pulmonary emphysema.
Learning objectives
In view of the fact that 80% of primary care physicians’ offices are now equipped with spirometers, our purpose in writing this article is to improve physicians’ understanding of
the typical history, symptoms, and signs of COPD,
the pulmonary function studies that should be performed or ordered, and
differential-diagnostic considerations with respect to physical findings and the results of pulmonary function tests.
The essential principles of the treatment of COPD are smoking cessation, anti-obstructive pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy, and exercise therapy. The reader is referred to the relevant guidelines for these matters (9– 12). The German National Disease Management Guideline for COPD is now being updated (e4).
Methods
This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search of PubMed with the search terms “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease” and “respiratory function tests,” along with textbooks of diagnostic pulmonary function testing (13, 14) and current clinical guidelines (9– 12). As there have been practically no controlled studies on the diagnostic evaluation of COPD, evidence levels are not mentioned here.
Epidemiology
The reported prevalence of COPD in Germany varies depending on age, smoking status, and the participation rates of the groups being studied, as well as the varying diagnostic criteria that are applied. In the international BOLD (Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease) Study of 2005, representative random samples of the population aged 40 and over were studied in 12 different locations around the world. In Germany, 683 persons living in Hannover were included in the study (participation rate: 28%). With COPD defined by the spirometric GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) criteria (Table 1), the prevalence of the condition was estimated at 13.2% (5.9% for grade 2 to 4 COPD, 7.4% for grade 1 COPD) (15, e5). The prevalence of COPD was about twice as high in men as in women and rose with age and with the quantity of cigarette smoking (measured in pack-years, i.e., the number of cigarettes smoked per day divided by 20 and multiplied by the duration of smoking in years) (15).
Table 1. The severity of airway obstruction in COPD.
| GOLD | Condition: testing after bronchodilation and FEV1/FVC < 0.7 | ||
| 1 | mild | FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted | |
| 2 | moderate | 50% ≤ FEV1 <80% predicted | |
| 3 | severe | 30% ≤ FEV1 <50% predicted | |
| 4 | very severe | FEV1 <30% predicted (until 2011. also fev1 <50% and chronic hypoxemia with pao2 < 60 mm hg) | |
| ATS/ERS | Condition: Tiffeneau Index below 5th percentile for normalized distribution (LLN) | ||
| 1 | mild | FEV1 ≥ 70% predicted | |
| 2 | moderate | FEV1 60–69% predicted | |
| 3 | moderate to severe | FEV1 50–59% predicted | |
| 4 | severe | FEV1 35–49% predicted | |
| 5 | very severe | FEV1 < 35% predicted | |
Classification of severity of airway obstruction in COPD according to GOLD and ATS/ERS (e28). The GOLD recommendation exclusively concerns COPD. while the ATS/ERS classification can be used for spirometric findings in general.
GOLD. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; ATS. American Thoracic Society; _ERS. European Respiratory Society; FEV1. forced expiratory volume in one second; _FVC. forced vital capacity; LLN. lower limit of normal
Epidemiology.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fifth most common cause of death in Germany.
A study conducted in primary care practices in 2007 on 432 smokers aged 40 and over, with a participation rate of 81%, revealed a much lower prevalence of COPD: 6.9%. Half of the patients found to have COPD in this study had not previously been given the diagnosis (e6).
In a study of 1809 volunteers from among the 3300 participants of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) (age range: 25–85), carried out in the period 2003–2006, the prevalence of COPD was either 1.9% or 6.7%, depending on the spirometric criterion used to define it (a fixed threshold for relative one-second capacity set at 0.7 in the GOLD scheme, versus the lower limit of the normal range derived from the study data [e7]).
Risk factors.
The most important risk factor for COPD is cigarette smoking.
Etiology
Inhaled cigarette smoke is the main risk factor for COPD in the Western world (15). In the German Adult Health Study (Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland), carried out from 2008 to 2011, the percentage of smokers among persons aged 18 to 79 was 29.7% (26.9% for women and 32.6% for men; one in five smokers of either sex were only occasional smokers [e8]). In a cohort study from Copenhagen, 20.7% of persons aged 30 to 60 with normal pulmonary function at baseline who were continually active smokers developed at least moderate COPD over 25 years of follow-up, compared to 3.6% of persons who never smoked (e9). Epidemiologic studies have shown that only about 5% of adults who have never smoked have COPD (16). It should be borne in mind, however, that many epidemiologic studies cannot reliably distinguish asthma from COPD because they are based exclusively on pulmonary function tests, often without any bronchodilator reversibility testing being performed.
Risk factors in nonsmokers.
The risk factors for COPD in nonsmokers include asthma, advanced age, low educational level, occupational exposure to noxious agents, and a history of airway infections in childhood.
The risk factors for COPD in nonsmokers include asthma (e10), advanced age, low educational level, occupational exposure to toxins, and a history of airway infections in childhood (17). COPD in persons who have never smoked has different features from COPD in current and former smokers, with a generally more favorable course (18). Around the world, biomass combustion for domestic cooking and heating, and the ensuing pollution of household air, are an important cause of COPD (19). The role of general air pollution remains unclear; its acute effects on pulmonary function have yet to be adequately separated from any chronic damage that it might produce (e11).
Pathogenesis
Airway obstruction in COPD results from changes in the airways and in the pulmonary parenchyma (Figure 1). Both components of the disease (bronchitis/bronchiolitis and emphysema) contribute to its clinical symptoms and signs and to the limitation of expiratory flow that is demonstrated by pulmonary function testing (20). In healthy individuals, the elasticity of lung tissue normally keeps the non-cartilaginous airways open during expiration; in COPD, reduced elasticity, along with airway narrowing due to inflammation, causes an increase in airway resistance and a displacement of its main component from the large bronchi to the small airways (14).
Figure 1.
Diagram of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of COPD, created by the authors on the basis of the articles by Hogg et al. (20) and Tuder and Petrache (e26). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Limitation of expiratory flow.
In COPD, expiratory flow is limited by the diminished available cross-sectional area of the small airways and by reduced elasticity of lung tissue.
Symptoms and signs
The clinical manifestations of COPD include dyspnea, chronic cough (productive or non-productive), low exercise capacity, audible wheezing, and more frequent or longer-lasting bronchial infections; a further manifestation of advanced COPD is weight loss (10). The appearance of at least one of these manifestations in the presence of a risk factor (usually cigarette smoking) should arouse the suspicion of COPD (10). The 7-day prevalence of individual manifestations of COPD among patients in GOLD stages 3 and 4 was determined in a multinational European study (21) (Ttable 2). The disease manifestations usually progress slowly. Persons who take little exercise to begin with can often tolerate a marked restriction of their pulmonary function without any symptoms whatsoever; others avoid shortness of breath by becoming less physically active (22). In a study from New Mexico, 31% of patients with COPD already had severe airway obstruction (GOLD 3 or 4) at the time of diagnosis (e12).
Table 2. The frequency of manifestations of severe COPD.
| Manifestation | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Breathlessness | 72.5% |
| Phlegm | 63.6% |
| Cough | 58.7% |
| Wheezing | 41.7% |
| Chest tightness | 28.3% |
The 7-day prevalence of various symptoms of COPD in patients whose forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is less than 50% predicted. according to Kessler et al. (21). COPD. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Patients describe dyspnea variously as a feeling of not getting enough air, of increased effort in inspiration or expiration, or of tightness in the chest. Dyspnea can arise during physical activity, while the patient is speaking, or at rest. The patient’s smoking history should be quantified in pack-years, or at least in years as a smoker (23).
Physical examination
The physical examination serves to provide further evidence of COPD, to detect accompanying conditions, and to rule out the most important differential diagnoses (23). Inspection may reveal abnormalities of the thoracic skeleton, e.g., kyphoscoliosis. Percussion and auscultation may yield evidence of left heart failure or a pleural effusion (23).
Continuous or musical adventitious lung sounds (“wheezes” and “rhonchi”; acoustic examples are available online [24]) are characteristic findings but are not invariably present. They arise from airway narrowing and mucous coating and are also heard in asthma attacks (25).
Diminished normal (“vesicular”) breathing sounds and increased resonance to percussion tend to be heard in more advanced COPD (e13).
Discontinuous adventitious lung sounds (crackles, previously known as rales) are characteristic of pulmonary fibrosis and of pulmonary congestion due to left heart failure; coarser crackles are sometimes heard in COPD with a bronchitic component (25). In very advanced COPD, or during a severe exacerbation, patients may have orthopnea, and the use of accessory muscles of respiration at rest may be seen (23).
Hyperinflation of the lungs.
The static component of pulmonary hyperinflation is due to the loss of elasticity in emphysematous lung tissue.
The symptoms and signs of COPD.
These include dyspnea, chronic cough (productive or not), low exercise capacity, audible wheezing, more frequent or longer-lasting bronchial infections, and, in advanced COPD, weight loss.
Ancillary diagnostic testing
The history and physical findings are not specific; only extreme symptoms and signs have a high positive predictive value (e.g., more than 55 years of smoking, accompanied by wheezing that can be heard both by the patient and by the doctor [e14]). Therefore, airway obstruction must be documented with pulmonary function testing to confirm the diagnosis of COPD securely (Figure 2) (11). Other types of ancillary diagnostic testing serve mainly to rule out competing differential diagnoses (10).
Figure 2.
Diagnostic algorithm for COPD, after Vogelmeier et al (12). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second
A chest x-ray in two planes is an obligate part of the initial evaluation. It helps rule out the following differential diagnoses:
congestive heart failure
pleural effusion
interstitial lung disease
tumor of the lung (10).
An electrocardiogram (ECG) should also be obtained in the initial evaluation (12). According to the Copenhagen City Heart Study, many patients with COPD also have coronary heart disease: 14.6% of those in GOLD stage 2, and 16.3% of those in GOLD stages 3 and 4 (e15). An echocardiogram should be obtained if cor pulmonale is suspected, or if there is any evidence of left heart failure (10).
Smoking behavior.
The patient’s smoking history should be quantified in pack-years, or at least in years as a smoker.
An arterial blood-gas analysis is obligatory only in severe cases of COPD or in patients with polycythemia or cor pulmonale (12). It is also recommended for patients whose oxygen saturation level in pulse oximetry is below 92% (10).
A complete blood count serves to exclude anemia as a possible cause of dyspnea in the differential diagnosis of COPD (10). For patients under age 65 who have smoked less than 20 pack-years, testing for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency is recommended, as this is a potential genetic cause of COPD (26). Diagnostic tests that are not recommended as a part of routine evaluation are summarized in the Box.
Box. Diagnostic tests that are not a part of the routine evaluation for suspected COPD.
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest to show emphysema
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest (39)
Allergy testing without any history suggesting allergic asthma
Nitric oxide measurement in expired air (FeNO)
Pulse oximetry for exertional desaturation
Ancillary diagnostic testing.
A chest x-ray in two planes is an obligate part of the routine diagnostic evaluation of COPD and serves to rule out important differential diagnoses.
Pulmonary function tests as a screening method?
The spirometric screening of asymptomatic persons at risk, e.g., smokers over age 40, has been a topic of discussion but is not recommended in the current guidelines (e16). An ongoing controlled trial is now being addressed to the important question whether patients’ knowledge of their pulmonary function values might increase their willingness to quit smoking (e17). The early diagnosis of COPD in asymptomatic persons would give many such persons a diagnostic label and possibly expose them to unnecessary drug treatment despite their low risk of future complications of COPD (e18).
On the other hand, heightened attention to patients’ symptoms and a greater readiness to proceed to spirometry are advisable in patients who seem likely to be able to tolerate a mild degree of impairment without complaint. If further investigation yields no indication for drug treatment, the patient should be advised to quit smoking and to have annual influenza vaccinations and a single vaccination against pneumococci.
Pulmonary function testing.
The diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary function testing in suspected COPD begins with spirometry.
Spirometry
The diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary function testing in suspected COPD begins with spirometry (3, 9– 12), the most sensitive way to detect airway obstruction. The patient performs a calm, maximal inspiration followed by a forced expiration; the expired volume of air in one second (forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1) and the total expired volume (forced expiratory vital capacity, FVC) are measured. This test relies on the patient’s cooperation. It must be administered by well-trained and motivated personnel in accordance with accepted standards; under these conditions, the findings can be considered reliable. In 90% of patients with COPD, two consecutive tests at short intervals yield consistent FEV1 values, with a difference of less than 225 mL between them (e19).
The respiratory maneuver described above is performed repeatedly (usually three times). Good reproducibility can be assumed if the values obtained for maximal expiratory flow cannot be increased any further by intense effort. The agreement of the two best measured values (the highest sum of FVC and FEV1) should be documented within a defined range (the difference between the two best values of FEV1 and FVC should not exceed 150 mL) (27, 28). The result of the forced-expiration test can be depicted as a flow-volume curve (Figure 3a). A detailed description of how this test is performed and how its quality can be assessed is found in the e-Supplement to this article.
Figure 3.
Ideal flow-volume curves for breathing at rest (smaller loop) and a forced maneuver (larger loop), with inspiration below and expiration above, the total lung capacity (TLC) indicated at left, and the residual volume (RV) at right on the volume axis.
a) Normal; b) mild obstruction; c) moderate obstruction with reduced FVC (forced vital capacity) and shift of respiration at rest toward inspiration; d) severe obstruction with limitation of expiratory flow at rest. In b)–d), the normal curve is shown in gray in the background. The expiratory portion of the curve becomes more concave with increasing obstruction.
Diagram: H.-J. Smith
Prerequisites for spirometry.
This test relies on the patient’s cooperation. It must be administered by well-trained and motivated personnel in accordance with accepted standards.
Diagnostic criteria
Spirometry generally suffices to demonstrate an abnormally low expiratory flow in patients with COPD (29). The most reliable criterion for airway obstruction is the ratio of FEV1 to vital capacity; according to the GOLD recommendations, vital capacity should be estimated by the FVC in the same respiratory maneuver from which the FEV1 was obtained (9).
Interpretation.
The FEV1/IVC ratio (also called the Tiffeneau Index in Germany), is the main criterion for airway obstruction.
Patients with COPD may be unable to expire fully in a forced maneuver because of premature bronchiolar collapse (“air trapping”); therefore, the vital capacity is additionally measured in an unforced, “slow” inspiratory maneuver (10). To distinguish it from the FVC, the vital capacity measured in this way is called the inspiratory vital capacity (abbreviated most correctly as IVC, often shortened to VC). In Germany, the FEV1/IVC ratio is referrred to as the Tiffeneau Index or the relative expiratory capacity in one second (27). For practical purposes, the highest measured value of the vital capacity (VCmax) can be used to compute this ratio (29).
Pulmonary function testing after the administration of a bronchodilator is recommended for the diagnosis and staging of COPD and for the assessment of its course. Such testing yields more reproducible results, enables more secure differentiation of COPD from asthma, and obviates the need to interrupt drug treatment in patients who are already being treated (10, 11).
What is normal?
Controversy still surrounds the question of what threshold value should be used to define a pathological degree of airway obstruction. The GOLD recommendation is that airway obstruction should be diagnosed if the FEV1/FVC quotient is below 0.7 (9). This recommendation takes no account of the fact that all pulmonary function values, including this quotient, normally vary as a function of the patient’s age, sex, height, and ethnic origin.
The range of normal is often defined as the range in which 95% of normal subjects are found (e20). A fixed threshold of 0.7, in contrast, leads to a false-positive diagnosis of airway obstruction in 25–60% of persons in their seventh decade (30). Meanwhile, it led to a false-negative diagnosis of no airway obstruction in 5.1% of the subjects in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey, who were 20 to 44 years old (31).
Normal limits.
For the diagnosis of COPD, concordant clinical symptoms and test findings are more important than statistical “normality,” which defines 5% of healthy persons as abnormal.
New prediction equations for normal values and their standard deviations were recently derived from pulmonary function tests carried out on more than 75 000 healthy individuals of diverse ethnic origins. The use of these values is expected to lessen the risk of diagnostic error (32, e21).
Differential diagnosis (1).
Asthma is distinguished from COPD mainly on clinical grounds. The case history can help: the symptoms of asthma tend to arise in young persons.
Differential diagnosis (2).
A normalization of FEV1 or an increase by more than 400 mL in bronchodilator reversibility test supports the diagnosis of asthma.
For the diagnosis of COPD, the correlation between the clinical symptoms on the one hand and the findings of pulmonary function tests on the other is more important than the statistically defined threshold of normality; after all, 5% of healthy individuals will also have values under this threshold. Conversely—in view of the considerable intraindividual variability of measured values—supposedly normal findings that are just above the threshold value do not rule out the diagnosis of COPD once the relevant differential diagnoses have been duly investigated (e21).
Spirometry is generally viewed as a diagnostic gold standard. Consequently, its diagnostic validity (along with that of other tests, and the diagnostic threshold values of each) can only be judged in reference to external criteria. These include patient-relevant endpoints such as mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations. More research is needed in this area. In particular, longitudinal studies would be helpful, as they would strengthen the evidence basis for evaluating the benefits and risks of currently available treatments (and those of future treatments) in each stage of COPD (33).
Indications for expanded pulmonary function testing
In patients with COPD, hyperinflation of the lungs (i.e., an increase of the residual volume that cannot be used for ventilation) is often a major contributory cause of dyspnea (34). The static component of pulmonary hyperinflation is due to loss of elasticity of the emphysematous pulmonary tissue (14). Hyperinflation is augmented by a shift of respiration at rest toward inspiration because of expiratory flow limitation. The latter phenomenon, called dynamic hyperinflation, initially arises during exercise and is later seen at rest as well. It facilitates the use of the remaining flow reserve but creates less favorable working conditions for the inspiratory musculature (e22).
The static lung volumes (Figure 4), including the residual volume, can be determined by body plethysmography. This measurement enables assessment of pulmonary hyperinflation (14). Expanded pulmonary function testing, performed by pulmonologists, is indicated if there is any residual uncertainty in the differential diagnosis, or if there is a discordance between the severity of dyspnea and the spirometric findings (e23). In addition to body plethysmography, a measurement of the diffusion capacity can also be helpful (10). It is low in emphysema because of the loss of lung parenchyma and the mismatch of ventilation and perfusion (14).
Figure 4.
Static lung volumes.
The portions above the horizontal line can also be measured by spirometry.
IRV, inspiratory reserve volume
TV, tidal volume
ERV, expiratory reserve volume
RV, residual volume.
Inspiratory capacity (IC) = IRV + TV
Vital capacity (VC) = IRV + TV + ERV
Functional residual capacity (FRC) = ERV + RV
Total capacity (TLC) = VC + RV, corresponding to the total height of the column.
Note the similarity of the spirometrically measured volumes in restrictive disease and emphysema
Grading
The FEV1, expressed as a percentage of the predicted value, is used to categorize the severity of airway obstruction (Table 1). In GOLD grade 1, and in mild obstruction as defined by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS), the FEV1/VC ratio is low, but the FEV1 is still normal. A patient with a spirometric finding of this type can only be given the diagnosis of COPD if he or she has symptoms (10). Examples of typical flow-volume curves in COPD of various grades are shown in Figures 3b to 3d.
Static lung volumes.
The static lung volumes, including the residual volume, can be measured by body plethysmography.
The realization that other factors besides the degree of impairment of pulmonary function are of prognostic relevance in COPD has led to the development of complex indices (35). A simplified multidimentional staging of COPD (with stages A, B, C, and D) that takes dyspnea and the frequency of exacerbations into account, as well as the findings of pulmonary function tests, has been recommended by GOLD since 2011 (10). The clinical manifestations must be assessed for staging purposes with one of three recommended questionnaires. This concept has not become established in clinical practice, nor has it been demonstrated to date that A-B-C-D staging actually improves either the prognostication or the treatment of COPD (36). According to the current guidelines, treatment decisions should be based on the severity of airway obstruction, along with the clinical manifestations and the frequency of exacerbations (9– 12).
Differential diagnosis
Asthma is distinguished from COPD mainly on clinical grounds. The case history can help: the symptoms of asthma tend to arise in young persons (although there are exceptions). Its course is typified by attacks of dyspnea with normal periods in between. The affected patients often have other allergic conditions affecting the skin and the upper airways. Patients with asthma often have normal spirometric findings during their asymptomatic intervals. Airway obstruction can be detected in such cases only by self-testing of pulmonary function (peak-flow protocol) or by bronchial provocation testing. If airway obstruction is present, bronchodilator reversibility testing can secure the diagnosis (Figure 2) (e24).
The limitations of spirometry.
Any evidence of a restrictive ventilatory impairment calls for further diagnostic evaluation.
Before bronchodilator reversibility testing is performed, any bronchodilating drugs that the patient may be taking are temporarily withheld (short-acting preparations for 4 hours, longer-acting ones for 12 or 24 hours). For the test, spirometry is performed at baseline, a bronchodilating drug (preferably salbutamol) is given in a dose of four 100 μg puffs at 30-second intervals, and spirometry is repeated 10 to 15 minutes later (37). Normalization of FEV1 or an increase by more than 400 mL supports the diagnosis of asthma (10, e24). If spirometry reveals that the FEV1 and IVC (or FVC) are all lowered to roughly the same extent, with a flow-volume curve resembling a proportionally shrunken version of the normal curve, then a restrictive impairment of ventilation is the likely diagnosis (Figure 5a). The further evaluation of such a finding requires measurement of the total lung capacity (TLC) by body plethysmography or gas dilution (e23). If the expiratory peak flow is reproducibly, markedly low compared to the FEV1 (Figure 5b), this may be due to a stenosis of the larger airways (e.g., vocal cord paresis or tumor-induced stenosis of the trachea or main bronchi) (13). Further diagnostic evaluation by a specialist is indicated. The typical clinical features and diagnostic findings associated with the more common causes of dyspnea are summarized in Table 3.
Figure 5.
Abnormal flow-volume curves superimposed on a normal curve (gray, background):
a) reduced IVC (inspiratory vital capacity) and FVC
(forced expiratory vital capacity) with normal flow values, indicating a restrictive ventilatory impairment;
b) reduced inspiratory and/or expiratory flow values, indicating stenosis of major airways. Diagram: H.-J. Smith
Table 3. Synoptic chart of clinical manifestations and findings.
| Grade 1–2 (–3) COPD | Grade 4 COPD (with emphysema) | Asthma | Interstitial lung disease | Congestive heart failure | Obesity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | Cough. expectoration. dyspnea | Dyspnea. cough. expectoration | Dyspnea episodes | Dyspnea. cough | Dyspnea. orthopnea. edema | Dyspnea |
| History | Smoker. onset of symptoms after age 40 | Smoker. onset of symptoms after age 40 | Allergies. onset of symptoms often before age 30 | Organic or inorganic dusts. adverse drug effect. collagenosis | Underlying cardiac disease | |
| Physical findings | Normal or continuous adventitious lung sounds | Low volume of breathing sounds. hypersonority to percussion. continuous adventitious lung sounds | Only during episode: continuous adventitious lung sounds | Discontinuous adventitious lung sounds | Discontinuous adventitious lung sounds | BMI usually >40 kg/m² |
| Chest x-ray | Normal | Low diaphragm. attenuation of pulmonary margins | Normal | Reticular or reticulonodular infiltrates | Enhanced pulmonary vessels. cardiomegaly | High diaphragm |
| Spirometry | FEV1/FVC < lln or < 0.7 | FEV1/FVC <lln or <0.7. fev1 below 35% predicted. vc and fvc abnormally low | FEV1 low with (near-) normalization after bronchial spasmolysis; normal findings between episodes | VC and FVC reduced. FEV1/FVC _>LLN or >0.7 | Normal. with possible reduction of VC and FVC | VC and FVC reduced. FEV1/FVC >LLN or >0.7 |
| Static volumes (body plethysmog<rraphy) | Normal or mildly increased RV | Markedly increased RV | Normal | Low TLC | Normal | Low TLC |
| Further pulmonary function tests | Airway resistance may be increased | Reduced diffusion capacity | Bronchial provocation test positive. PEF variable | Reduced diffusion capacity | Normal | Normal diffusion capacity |
| Blood gases | Hypoxemia may be seen | Hypoxemia; hypercapnia may also be seen | Hypoxemia during episodes; hypercapnia as well in status asthmaticus | Hypoxemia | Hypoxemia and acidosis possible in severe. acute decompensation | Normal |
Simplified synoptic chart of typical clinical manifestations and findings of the most common diseases causing dyspnea. The features listed are neither invariably present nor sufficient for diagnosis. FEV1. forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC. forced expiratory vital capacity; VC. inspiratory vital capaity; FEV1/FVC. relative one-second capacity; RV. residual volume; TLC. total lung capacity; PEF. peak expiratory flow; LLN. lower limit of normal. This chart was created in accordance with the authors’ clinical experience and in the light of the pertinent specialized literature. especially (13. 40. e27)
Diseases to be considered in differential diagnosis that can closely resemble COPD in both their clinical manifestations and their spirometric findings include asthma with a fixed obstruction, bronchiectasis, mucoviscidosis, sarcoidosis, silicosis, and tuberculosis (9).
Lastly, one must bear in mind that the symptoms may have more than one cause, e.g., coexistent asthma and COPD (a combination in which the treatment is directed mainly against asthma [e25]), lung cancer and COPD, or left heart failure and COPD. Exercise testing (spiroergometry) may be indicated so that the different contributions of cardiac and bronchopulmonary dysfunction can be told apart (38).
Differential diagnosis (3).
Obstructive ventilatory impairment is a feature not only of COPD, but also of bronchiectasis, mucoviscidosis, sarcoidosis, silicosis, and tuberculosis, among other conditions.
Conclusion
The widespread availability of electronic spirometers in primary care physicians’ practices in Germany provides a good basis for further improvement in the diagnosis of COPD. This will be possible only if physicians are watchful for the risk factors for COPD and its mild initial symptoms and perform pulmonary function testing on all patients with a chronic cough, with or without expectoration. The demonstration of an irreversible airway obstruction confirms the diagnosis. Treatment should then be provided as recommended in the pertinent guidelines (9–12). Treatment decisions are made on the basis of the clinical manifestations, the severity of airway obstruction, and the frequency of exacerbations. A chest x-ray in two planes complements the primary care physician’s basic diagnostic evaluation. Any discrepancy between the clinical manifestations and the findings, inadequate cooperation with pulmonary function testing, evidence that a cause other than COPD or a significant comorbidity of COPD may be present, or an unusual constellation of findings should prompt referral of the patient to a pulmonologist for further evaluation. Another reason for referral is to evaluate the indications for treatments such as long-term oxygen therapy for severe COPD.
The symptoms may have more than one cause. Common combinations include:
Asthma and COPD
Lung cancer and COPD
Left heart failure and COPD
Supplementary Material
Rainer Burkhardt, Wulf Pankow
The spirometric examination
The calibration of all spirometers should be checked and verified with a 3-liter calibrating injection at least once on each examining day, before the first patient is tested (37). The tolerance limit for deviations from the applied volume is 3.5% (e29). Such testing should also be carried out whenever the measured values seem implausible. Artefactually high values may be due to material deposited in the flow sensor (pneumotachograph) (e30). Volume errors due to fluctuations of air temperature and humidity must be corrected by entering the current environmental conditions into the system.
The spirometric examination (37) consists of maneuvers that involve breathing at rest followed by a forced expiration maneuver. Once accommodated to the nose clamp and to oral breathing through the mouthpiece and filter, the patient is asked to perform a maximal, temporally unlimited expiration until volume tracing in the spirogram reaches a plateau. The patient is then instructed to take a rapid, maximal inspiration. The inspired volume is the IVC (inspiratory vital capacity). Right after this maximal inspiration, without any pause in between, there follows a maximally rapid (forced) and complete (sustained) expiration, under the enthusiastic encouragement of the testing personnel. Six seconds usually suffice for this maneuver, but it may take much longer in persons with COPD because of the increased limitation of expiratory flow. The test should be stopped if prolonged expiration is too much of a strain for the patient, or if no plateau has been reached in 15 seconds.
The graph of volume against time over the course of this maneuver is called a spirogram (eFigure 1). The spirogram is the source of the partial lung volumes known as IVC, tidal volume (VT), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), and inspiratory capacity (IC). Forced expiration permits measurement of the FEV1 (forced expiratory capacity in one second) and FVC (forced expiratory vital capacity). Maximal inspiration and forced expiration are depicted graphically as a flow-volume curve. The patient’s performance of respiratory maneuvers is easiest to monitor and control if the spirogram and flow-volume curve are displayed on a screen in real time (37).
eFigure 1
Volume and flow relationships in a standardized spirographic test with a bar chart of volume parameters (left) and a flow-volume curve for the forced expiration meneuver (right), displayed on a common volume axis; normal findings. ERV, expiratory reserve volume; VT, tidal volume; IRV, inspiratory reserve volume; FRC, functional residual capacity; IC, inspiratory capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced expiratory vital capacity; TLC, total lung capacity; PEF, peak expiratory flow; MEF25, maximal expiratory flow with 25% of FVC remaining to be expired; MEF50, maximal expiratory flow at half of FVC; MEF75, maximal expiratory flow with 75% of FVC remaining to be expired. The parameters MEF50 and MEF25 for the maximal expiratory flow in the middle and terminal portions of expiration, which are derived from the flow-volume curve, vary too widely among normal persons to be of diagnostic value (e33).
Diagram: H.-J. Smith.
The measured parameters permit an objective characterization of lung function if the patient has taken a maximal inspiration to TLC (total lung capacity) and if the expiratory effort was sufficient to generate maximum flow under the individual limitations present in health or disease. The two most successful attempts should yield nearly superimposable curves (29).
Quality assessment
The measured FEV1 value can be altered by the temporal delay (inevitable, to some extent) until peak expiratory flow (PEF) is reached. To eliminate this effect, the time of onset of expiration for measuring purposes is determined by a mathematical extrapolation, as if the expiration had been performed with peak flow from the beginning. The volume of air already expired up to this moment is called the extrapolation volume (37).
The following criteria characterize a successful forced expiration maneuver (28):
A maximal inspiration was performed.
The forced expiration began immediately after the end of the maximal inspiration, as can be seen from the minimal duration of the inspiratory plateau on the spirogram.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was reached within 120 ms (steep initial portion of flow-volume curve).
Extrapolation volume ≤ 150 mL (or 5% of FVC, if FVC >3 L).
A smooth curve of volume against time (no coughing during the maneuver, no interruption of forced expiratory flow by additional inspiration, glottis closure, or hesitation).
No premature termination of the maneuver (plateau attainment: volume change <25 mL in the last second of visibly sustained expiratory effort).
No air leak in the mouthpiece or filter.
No obstruction of the mouthpiece by the tongue or a dental prosthesis.
The documentation of any confounding factors that may arise during testing (insofar as they are not automatically detected by the apparatus) further enhances the validity of the interpretation. It is also very important for the physician interpreting the test findings to report back to the testing personnel his or her assessment of the quality of testing (e31).
An illustrative flow-volume curve containing various indications of faulty test performance is shown in eFigure 2. Even the less than fully successful attempts can suffice for a determination of the FEV1, as long as the expiration was begun without delay and the patient did not cough during the first second.
The interpretation of findings can be made more reliable through the use of the new norm tables that take account of the patient’s ethnic origin (e32). Software for the calculation of the new norms and threshold values can be downloaded free of charge from the website www.lungfunction.org.
This appendix was prepared with the assistance of Dipl. Ing.Hans-Jürgen Smith (CareFusion Germany 234 GmbH, Höchberg).
eGrafik 2
Errors in the performance of spirometry that can be recognized on the flow-volume curve:
low effort with flat course of maximal flow; FVC < IVC because of premature cessation of expiration, air leak of the mouthpiece, or improper zero level adjustment of the spirometer; in patients with severe obstruction, FVC < IVC may also be due to the expiratory collapse of peripheral airways;
delayed start of expiration, coughing during forced expiration, and sudden termination of expiration.
FVC, forced expiratory vital capacity; IVC, inspiratory vital capacity.
Diagram, H.-J. Smith
Further information on CME.
This article has been certified by the North Rhine Academy for Postgraduate and Continuing Medical Education. Deutsches Ärzteblatt provides certified continuing medical education (CME) in accordance with the requirements of the Medical Associations of the German federal states (Länder). CME points of the Medical Associations can be acquired only through the Internet, not by mail or fax, by the use of the German version of the CME questionnaire. See the following website: cme.aerzteblatt.de.
Participants in the CME program can manage their CME points with their 15-digit “uniform CME number” (einheitliche Fortbildungsnummer, EFN). The EFN must be entered in the appropriate field in the cme.aerzteblatt.de website under “meine Daten” (“my data”), or upon registration. The EFN appears on each participant’s CME certificate.
This CME unit can be accessed until 1 March 2015, and earlier CME units until the dates indicated:
“Chronic and Treatment Resistant Depression” (Issue 45/2014), until 1 February 2015;
“Physical Examination in Child Sexual Abuse” (Issue 41/2014), until 4 January 2015;
“Urinalysis in Children and Adolescents” (Issue 37/2014) until 7 December 2014.
Please answer the following questions to participate in our Continuing Medical Education program. Only one answer is possible per question. Please select the answer that is most appropriate.
Question 1
Which of the following factors makes the prevalence of COPD hard to estimate epidemiologically?
the declining number of smokers
variable diagnostic criteria across studies
recent demographic trends
increasing participation rates in clinical trials
the many patients whose pulmonary function has normalized due to appropriate treatment
Question 2
Which of the following is the most important risk factor for COPD in Germany?
cholesterol
overweight
cigarette smoking
glucose intolerance
environmental pollution
Question 3
A 50-year-old male smoker comes for follow-up after an episode of bronchitis with dyspnea. The heart and lungs are normal to auscultation. In the past two years, he has had more frequent episodes of bronchitis than before. Which test should be done first in the further work-up?
echocardiography
blood-gas analysis
immunglobulin subclass measurement
spirometry
HIV screening test
Question 4
Which of the following symptoms in a smoker can be considered evidence of COPD?
polyuria
memory disturbances
exertional dyspnea
allergies
recurrent diarrhea
Question 5
What abnormality of speech may be a sign of dyspnea due to COPD?
dyslalia
dysphasia
sigmatism
interrupted flow of speech
stuttering
Question 6
Which of the following is a typical physical finding in a patient with COPD?
peripheral edema
in the early stage, the physical examination is often completely normal
dullness of the lung fields to percussion
pallor of the skin
a diastolic heart murmur
Question 7
What is the most sensitive test for airway obstruction?
ECG at rest
chest x-ray in expiration
duplex sonography
spirometry with forced expiration
pulse oximetry
Question 8
What does “FEV1” stand for?
the average volume of gas moved in one minute of normal breathing
the total volume expired in a forced expiration
the maximal volume expired in one minute by forced expiration
the maximal volume expired in one second by forced expiration
the maximal volume that can be additionally expired after a normal expiration
Question 9
In a 62-year-old female smoker with increased fatigability, spirometry reveals a Tiffeneau Index of 0.58 and an FEV1 that is 65% of the reference value. Her FEV1 remains markedly low in a bronchodilator reversibility test. What is the most likely diagnosis?
interstitial lung disease with a restrictive ventilation disturbance
COPD
bronchial asthma
left-heart failure
a combined ventilation disturbance
Question 10
A 45-year-old female nonsmoker with a history of hay fever and episodic dyspnea complains of shortness of breath in the setting of an acute airway infection. Auscultation reveals wheezing. The FEV1 is 55% of the reference value, and the Tiffeneau Index is 0.6. Both of these values become normal during bronchodilator reversibility testing. What is the most likely diagnosis?
COPD with GOLD 2 airway obstruction
COPD with GOLD 4 airway obstruction
bronchial asthma
interstitial lung disease
congestive heart failure
Acknowledgments
Translated from the original German by Ethan Taub, M.D.
The authors thank Dipl. Ing. Hans-Jürgen Smith for producing Figures 3 and 5.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
The authors state that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2163–2196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ciba Foundation Guest Symposium Terminology, definitions, and classification of chronic pulmonary emphysema and related conditions a report of the conclusions of a Ciba guest symposium. Thorax. 1959;14:286–299. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mannino DM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: definition and epidemiology. Respir Care. 2003;48:1185–1193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tashkin DP. Variations in FEV1 decline over time in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its implications. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013;19:116–124. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835d8ea4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Calverley PMA, Anderson JA, Celli B, et al. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:775–789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, et al. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1128–1138. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Soriano JB, Zielinski J, Price D. Screening for and early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2009;374:721–732. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61290-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD. Updated 2014. www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2014_Jan23.pdf. 2010. (last accessed on 7 August 2014)
- 10.National Clinical Guideline Centre. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg101/resources/guidance-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-pdf. (last accessed on 7 August 2014)
- 11.Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Weinberger SE, et al. Diagnosis and management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:179–191. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-3-201108020-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vogelmeier C, Buhl R, Criee CP, et al. Leitlinie der Deutschen Atemwegsliga und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin zur Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit chronisch obstruktiver Bronchitis und Lungenemphysem (COPD) Pneumologie. 2007;61:e1–#e40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-959200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hyatt RE, Scanlon PD, Nakamura M. a practical guide. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2008. Interpretation of pulmonary function tests. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gibson GJ. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold; 2009. Clinical tests of respiratory function. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buist AS, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, et al. International variation in the prevalence of COPD (the BOLD study): a population-based prevalence study. Lancet. 2007;370:741–750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61377-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leung JM, Sin DD. COPD in never smokers: prognosis unveiled. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:502–504. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70157-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lamprecht B, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, et al. COPD in never smokers: results from the population-based burden of obstructive lung disease study. Chest. 2011;139:752–763. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thomsen M, Nordestgaard BG, Vestbo J, Lange P. Characteristics and outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in never smokers in Denmark: a prospective population study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:543–550. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Salvi SS, Barnes PJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in non-smokers. Lancet. 2009;374:733–743. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61303-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, et al. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2645–2653. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kessler R, Partridge MR, Miravitlles M, et al. Symptom variability in patients with severe COPD: a pan-European cross-sectional study. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:264–272. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00051110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Van Remoortel H, Hornikx M, Demeyer H, et al. Daily physical activity in subjects with newly diagnosed COPD. Thorax. 2013;68:962–963. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holleman D, Simel D. Does the clinical examination predict airflow limitation? JAMA. 1995;273:313–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Littmann® 3M. www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8OC7EiqBKQ&feature=kp. Physiological & pathological breath sounds. (last accessed on 7 August 2014) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bohadana A, Izbicki G, Kraman SS. Fundamentals of lung auscultation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:744–751. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1302901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marciniuk D, Hernandez P, Balter M, et al. Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency targeted testing and augmentation therapy: A Canadian Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Can Respir J. 2012;19:109–116. doi: 10.1155/2012/920918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Criée C-P, Berdel D, Heise D, et al. Empfehlungen der Deutschen Atemwegsliga zur Spirometrie. www.atemwegsliga.de/empfehlungen-positionspapiere.html. 2006 doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944245. (last accessed on 7 August 2014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Spirometry for health care providers. www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Spirometry_2010.pdf. 2010. (last accessed on 7 August 2014)
- 29.Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–968. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Swanney MP, Ruppel G, Enright PL, et al. Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstruction. Thorax. 2008;63:1046–1051. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.098483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cerveri I, Corsico AG, Accordini S, et al. Underestimation of airflow obstruction among young adults using FEV1/FVC <70% as a fixed cut-off: a longitudinal evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes. Thorax. 2008;63:1040–1045. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.095554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1324–1343. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bourbeau J, Tan WC, Benedetti A, et al. Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD): Fulfilling the need for longitudinal observational studies in COPD COPD. J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;11:125–132. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2012.665520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thomas M, Decramer M, O’Donnell D. No room to breathe: the importance of lung hyperinflation in COPD. Prim Care Respir J. 2013;22:101–111. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1005–1012. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Agusti AA, Hurd S, Jones P, et al. FAQs about the GOLD 2011 assessment proposal of COPD: a comparative analysis of four different cohorts. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1391–1401. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00036513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–338. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Peters SP. When the chief complaint is (or should be) dyspnea in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1:129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wielpütz MO, Heußel CP, Herth FJF, Kauczor H-U. Radiological diagnosis in lung disease: factoring treatment options into the choice of diagnostic modality. Dtsch Arztebl International. 2014;111:181–187. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kroegel C, Costabel U. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2014. Klinische Pneumologie: das Referenzwerk für Klinik und Praxis. [Google Scholar]
- e1.Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Todesursachenstatistik, Statistik der Gestorbenen, Todesursache, Sterbefälle. www.gbe-bund.de/glossar/Todesursachenstatistik.html. 2014. (last accessed on 7 August 2014)
- e2.Casanova C, Aguirre-Jaíme A, Torres JP de, et al. Longitudinal assessment in COPD patients: multidimensional variability and outcomes. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:745–753. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00096913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e3.Advisory Council for the Concerted Action in Health Care. Appropriateness and efficiency. Volume III: Overuse, underuse and misuse. www.svr-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Gutachten/2000-2001/Kurzf-engl01.pdf. 2001. (last accessed on 7 August 2014)
- e4.Abholz H, Gillissen A, Magnussen H, et al. Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie COPD Langfassung Version 19, basierend auf der Fassung vom Februar 2006. www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/copd/pdf/nvl-copd-lang-1.9.pdf. 2012 (last accessed on 7 August 2014) [Google Scholar]
- e5.Geldmacher H, Biller H, Herbst A, et al. Die Prävalenz der chronisch obstruktiven Lungenerkrankung (COPD) in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der BOLD-Studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008;133:2609–2614. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1105858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e6.Gingter C, Wilm S, Abholz H-H. Is COPD a rare disease? Prevalence and identification rates in smokers aged 40 years and over within general practice in Germany. Fam Pract. 2009;26:3–9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e7.Gläser S, Schäper C, Obst A, et al. Impact of different definitions of airflow limitation on the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the general population. Respiration. 2010;80:292–300. doi: 10.1159/000282171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e8.Lampert T, Lippe E von der, Müters S. Verbreitung des Rauchens in der Erwachsenenbevölkerung in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;5:802–808. doi: 10.1007/s00103-013-1698-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e9.Løkke A, Lange P, Scharling H, Fabricius P, Vestbo J. Developing COPD: a 25 year follow up study of the general population. Thorax. 2006;61:935–939. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.062802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e10.Behrendt CE. Mild and moderate-to-severe COPD in nonsmokers: distinct demographic profiles. Chest. 2005;128:1239–1244. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e11.Schikowski T, Mills IC, Anderson HR, et al. Ambient air pollution: a cause of COPD? Eur Respir J. 2014;43:250–263. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00100112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e12.Mapel DW, Dalal AA, Blanchette CM, Petersen H, Ferguson GT. Severity of COPD at initial spirometry-confirmed diagnosis: data from medical charts and administrative claims. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:573–581. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S16975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e13.Oshaug K, Halvorsen PA, Melbye H. Should chest examination be reinstated in the early diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:369–377. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S47992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e14.Simel D, DL Simel D, Rennie SA, Keitz . The rational clinical examination: evidence-based clinical diagnosis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. Update: chronic obstructive airways disease; pp. 159–162. [Google Scholar]
- e15.Fabricius P, Løkke A, Marott JL, Vestbo J, Lange P. Prevalence of COPD in Copenhagen. Respir Med. 2011;105:410–417. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e16.Lam DCL, Hui CKM, Ip MSM. Issues in pulmonary function testing for the screening and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012;18:104–111. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834feae7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e17.Irizar-Aramburu M, Martinez-Eizaguirre J, Pacheco-Bravo P, et al. Effectiveness of spirometry as a motivational tool for smoking cessation: a clinical trial, the ESPIMOAT study. BMC Family Practice. 2013;14 doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e18.Murphy DE, Panos RJ. Diagnosis of COPD and clinical course in patients with unrecognized airflow limitation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:199–208. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S39555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e19.Herpel LB, Kanner RE, Lee SM, et al. Variability of spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Results from two clinical trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:1106–1113. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-975OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e20.Miller MR. Getting the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease correct. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:228–229. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1047LE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e21.Stanojevic S, Quanjer P, Miller MR, Stocks J. The Global Lung Function Initiative: dispelling some myths of lung function test interpretation. Breathe. 2013;9:462–474. [Google Scholar]
- e22.Loring SH, Garcia-Jacques M, Malhotra A. Pulmonary characteristics in COPD and mechanisms of increased work of breathing. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107:309–314. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e23.Price DB, Yawn BP, Jones RCM. Improving the differential diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:1122–1129. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e24.Miravitlles M, Andreu I, Romero Y, Sitjar S, Altés A, Anton E. Difficulties in differential diagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:e68–e75. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X625111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e25.Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. www.ginasthma.org/documents/4. 2014. (last accessed on 7 August 2014) [Google Scholar]
- e26.Tuder RM, Petrache I. Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2749–2755. doi: 10.1172/JCI60324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e27.Köhler D, Schönhofer B, Voshaar T. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2010. Pneumologie: Ein Leitfaden für rationales Handeln in Klinik und Praxis. [Google Scholar]
- e28.European Respiratory Society. European lung white book. www.erswhitebook.org/ 2013. (last accessed on 7 August 2014)
- e29.Coates A, Graham B, McFadden R, et al. Spirometry in primary care. Can Respir J. 2013;20:13–21. doi: 10.1155/2013/615281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e30.Townsend MC, Hankinson JL, Lindesmith LA, Slivka WA, Stiver G, Ayres GT. Is my lung function really that good? Flow-type spirometer problems that elevate test results. Chest. 2004;125:1902–1909. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.5.1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e31.Enright PL. Should we keep pushing for a spirometer in every doctor’s office? Respir Care. 2012;57:146–153. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e32.Quanjer PH, Pretto JJ, Brazzale DJ, Boros PW. Grading the severity of airways obstruction: new wine in new bottles. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:505–512. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00086313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- e33.Quanjer PH, Weiner DJ, Pretto JJ, Brazzale DJ, Boros PW. Measurement of FEF25-75% and FEF75% does not contribute to clinical decision making. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:1051–1058. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00128113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Rainer Burkhardt, Wulf Pankow
The spirometric examination
The calibration of all spirometers should be checked and verified with a 3-liter calibrating injection at least once on each examining day, before the first patient is tested (37). The tolerance limit for deviations from the applied volume is 3.5% (e29). Such testing should also be carried out whenever the measured values seem implausible. Artefactually high values may be due to material deposited in the flow sensor (pneumotachograph) (e30). Volume errors due to fluctuations of air temperature and humidity must be corrected by entering the current environmental conditions into the system.
The spirometric examination (37) consists of maneuvers that involve breathing at rest followed by a forced expiration maneuver. Once accommodated to the nose clamp and to oral breathing through the mouthpiece and filter, the patient is asked to perform a maximal, temporally unlimited expiration until volume tracing in the spirogram reaches a plateau. The patient is then instructed to take a rapid, maximal inspiration. The inspired volume is the IVC (inspiratory vital capacity). Right after this maximal inspiration, without any pause in between, there follows a maximally rapid (forced) and complete (sustained) expiration, under the enthusiastic encouragement of the testing personnel. Six seconds usually suffice for this maneuver, but it may take much longer in persons with COPD because of the increased limitation of expiratory flow. The test should be stopped if prolonged expiration is too much of a strain for the patient, or if no plateau has been reached in 15 seconds.
The graph of volume against time over the course of this maneuver is called a spirogram (eFigure 1). The spirogram is the source of the partial lung volumes known as IVC, tidal volume (VT), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), and inspiratory capacity (IC). Forced expiration permits measurement of the FEV1 (forced expiratory capacity in one second) and FVC (forced expiratory vital capacity). Maximal inspiration and forced expiration are depicted graphically as a flow-volume curve. The patient’s performance of respiratory maneuvers is easiest to monitor and control if the spirogram and flow-volume curve are displayed on a screen in real time (37).
eFigure 1
Volume and flow relationships in a standardized spirographic test with a bar chart of volume parameters (left) and a flow-volume curve for the forced expiration meneuver (right), displayed on a common volume axis; normal findings. ERV, expiratory reserve volume; VT, tidal volume; IRV, inspiratory reserve volume; FRC, functional residual capacity; IC, inspiratory capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced expiratory vital capacity; TLC, total lung capacity; PEF, peak expiratory flow; MEF25, maximal expiratory flow with 25% of FVC remaining to be expired; MEF50, maximal expiratory flow at half of FVC; MEF75, maximal expiratory flow with 75% of FVC remaining to be expired. The parameters MEF50 and MEF25 for the maximal expiratory flow in the middle and terminal portions of expiration, which are derived from the flow-volume curve, vary too widely among normal persons to be of diagnostic value (e33).
Diagram: H.-J. Smith.
The measured parameters permit an objective characterization of lung function if the patient has taken a maximal inspiration to TLC (total lung capacity) and if the expiratory effort was sufficient to generate maximum flow under the individual limitations present in health or disease. The two most successful attempts should yield nearly superimposable curves (29).
Quality assessment
The measured FEV1 value can be altered by the temporal delay (inevitable, to some extent) until peak expiratory flow (PEF) is reached. To eliminate this effect, the time of onset of expiration for measuring purposes is determined by a mathematical extrapolation, as if the expiration had been performed with peak flow from the beginning. The volume of air already expired up to this moment is called the extrapolation volume (37).
The following criteria characterize a successful forced expiration maneuver (28):
A maximal inspiration was performed.
The forced expiration began immediately after the end of the maximal inspiration, as can be seen from the minimal duration of the inspiratory plateau on the spirogram.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was reached within 120 ms (steep initial portion of flow-volume curve).
Extrapolation volume ≤ 150 mL (or 5% of FVC, if FVC >3 L).
A smooth curve of volume against time (no coughing during the maneuver, no interruption of forced expiratory flow by additional inspiration, glottis closure, or hesitation).
No premature termination of the maneuver (plateau attainment: volume change <25 mL in the last second of visibly sustained expiratory effort).
No air leak in the mouthpiece or filter.
No obstruction of the mouthpiece by the tongue or a dental prosthesis.
The documentation of any confounding factors that may arise during testing (insofar as they are not automatically detected by the apparatus) further enhances the validity of the interpretation. It is also very important for the physician interpreting the test findings to report back to the testing personnel his or her assessment of the quality of testing (e31).
An illustrative flow-volume curve containing various indications of faulty test performance is shown in eFigure 2. Even the less than fully successful attempts can suffice for a determination of the FEV1, as long as the expiration was begun without delay and the patient did not cough during the first second.
The interpretation of findings can be made more reliable through the use of the new norm tables that take account of the patient’s ethnic origin (e32). Software for the calculation of the new norms and threshold values can be downloaded free of charge from the website www.lungfunction.org.
This appendix was prepared with the assistance of Dipl. Ing.Hans-Jürgen Smith (CareFusion Germany 234 GmbH, Höchberg).
eGrafik 2
Errors in the performance of spirometry that can be recognized on the flow-volume curve:
low effort with flat course of maximal flow; FVC < IVC because of premature cessation of expiration, air leak of the mouthpiece, or improper zero level adjustment of the spirometer; in patients with severe obstruction, FVC < IVC may also be due to the expiratory collapse of peripheral airways;
delayed start of expiration, coughing during forced expiration, and sudden termination of expiration.
FVC, forced expiratory vital capacity; IVC, inspiratory vital capacity.
Diagram, H.-J. Smith







