Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare disease of the peripheral nervous system, characterized by gradual increasing weakness of the limbs, with more than 50% of patients experiencing marked disability 1. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism of CIDP remains unknown; however, studies have shown activated T cells in the circulation of CIDP patients 2–4. In addition, patient studies suggest a key role for autoreactive T cell responses against peripheral myelin antigens such as P0, P1, P2 and peripheral myelin protein PMP-22 5,6. Mechanism-of-action studies in other chronic autoimmune diseases have shown that the T cell memory compartment influences antigen responses by showing up-regulation of CD4+ or CD8+ T effector memory (TEM) cells 7,8. Recently, published data from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment in CIDP patients 9. However, the underlying mechanism of action of IVIg in the treatment of CIDP remains unclear 10,11. The aim of this study was to investigate the course of autoreactive T cell responses against the two peripheral myelin antigens P2 and PMP-22 in addition to the frequency of memory T cell subsets during IVIg treatment in CIDP patients 12.
In an observational trial of previously IVIg-treated patients (maintenance), previously untreated patients (treatment-naive) and controls (n = 48), IVIg treatment-naive patients (n = 18) were evaluated clinically prior to the first IVIg treatment (baseline) and at 4-week intervals after IVIg treatment initiation by using the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score and walking distance to assess the clinical status 12. In addition, a blood sample was provided for analysis. Peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) were isolated from blood samples from treatment-naive patients (n = 18) at baseline and at follow-up (at least 6 months after IVIg treatment initiation, mean 20 months). For comparison, PBMCs were extracted from blood samples from CIDP patients (n = 16) receiving IVIg as a maintenance therapy (mean 33 months). Additionally, patients with non-immune neuropathy or healthy individuals acted as controls (n = 14). In order to quantify frequencies of interferon (IFN)-γ-producing T cells directed against the peripheral myelin antigens PMP-22 and P2 (autoreactive T cell response), cryopreserved (and subsequently thawed) PBMCs were assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) analysis. In addition, flow cytometric analysis was performed using freshly isolated PBMCs to quantify T memory subsets. Response to treatment was defined as an improvement of 2 or more points on the MRC sum score in two different muscle groups 13, an improvement of 1 point or more on INCAT disability score (except for the changes in upper limb function from 0 to 1) 9 or an improvement of the walking distance of more than 50% compared to baseline results to also cover patients with a dominant sensory atactic syndrome 12.
Baseline demographics were not significantly different between responders and non-responders, particularly with regard to sex, age, previous treatment, time since diagnosis, diagnosis or clinical severity. IVIg responders showed significantly higher autoantigen-specific T cell responses against peripheral myelin antigens PMP-22 and P2 (PMP-2232–51 and PMP-22120–133 as well as P214–25 and P261–70) at baseline compared to IVIg non-responders, maintenance therapy patients and controls. Maintenance therapy patients showed levels of IFN-γ responses similar to that of controls, those with other neuropathies and to non-responders. Analysing T memory compartments at baseline, IVIg responders (n = 10) showed increased frequencies of CD4+ central memory T cells (TCM; CD4+45RA–CCR7+) and effector/memory T cells (TEM; CD4+45RA–CCR7–) compared to controls and to the maintenance group. In contrast, non-responders (n = 8) did not differ from control groups. CD8+ memory T cells showed increased TEM frequencies in responders compared to non-responders and by trend to other groups. For CD8+ TCM, non-responders differed significantly from other groups (maintenance and healthy control group) 12.
In order to investigate the long-term effect of IVIg on autoreactive T cell responses, treatment-naive CIDP patients were investigated longitudinally prior to treatment (baseline) and after repeated IVIg infusions (follow-up, mean 20 months). Data showed a significant reduction in IFN-γ-specific T cell responses for peripheral myelin antigens (PMP-2232–51 and PMP-22120–133 as well as for P261–70) over time in treatment responders. In contrast, treatment non-responders, who had no increased T cell response at baseline, did not differ in IFN-γ-specific T cell responses following IVIg treatment over time. Further analysis of T memory subsets found no statistical difference for CD4+ T cell subsets between baseline and follow-up. In contrast, CD8+ TEM were reduced significantly at follow-up 12.
Our data demonstrate that treatment with IVIg on a long-term basis reduces the autoreactive T cell response against peripheral myelin antigens which may be influenced by altered maintenance of CD8+ and CD4+ effector/memory T cell subsets towards a more anti-inflammatory immune status. Therefore, the assessment of such antigen-specific T cell responses may also serve as a biomarker to predict responsiveness to IVIg, warranting confirmation in a greater multi-centre cohort trial.
Acknowledgments
J. K., C. M. and A. M. thank Claudia Conert and Viola Kohlrautz for technical assistance as well as Siegfried Kohler, Lena Ulm, Jos Göhler and Hendrik Harms. The authors would also like to thank Meridian HealthComms Ltd for providing medical writing services.
Disclosures
The study was funded by a research grant from Octapharma and supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation, NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Exc 257). J. K. has received honoraria for activities with Grifols, and CSL Behring. C. M. and A. M. have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
- Lunn MP, Manji H, Choudhary PP, Hughes RA, Thomas PK. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a prevalence study in south east England. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:677–680. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.5.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes RA, Allen D, Makowska A, Gregson NA. Pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2006;11:30–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2006.00061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adam AM, Atkinson PF, Hall SM, Hughes RA, Taylor WA. Chronic experimental allergic neuritis in Lewis rats. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1989;15:249–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1989.tb01226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van den Berg LH, Mollee I, Wokke JH, Logtenberg T. Increased frequencies of HPRT mutant T lymphocytes in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: further evidence for a role of T cells in the etiopathogenesis of peripheral demyelinating diseases. J Neuroimmunol. 1995;58:37–42. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(94)00185-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Csurhes PA, Sullivan AA, Green K, Pender MP, McCombe PA. T cell reactivity to P0, P2, PMP-22, and myelin basic protein in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1431–1439. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.052282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanvito L, Makowska A, Gregson N, Nemni R, Hughes RA. Circulating subsets and CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cell function in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Autoimmunity. 2009;42:667–677. doi: 10.3109/08916930903140907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abdulahad WH, van der Geld YM, Stegeman CA, Kallenberg CG. Persistent expansion of CD4+ effector memory T cells in Wegener's granulomatosis. Kidney Int. 2006;70:938–947. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haegele KF, Stueckle CA, Malin JP, Sindern E. Increase of CD8+ T-effector memory cells in peripheral blood of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis compared to healthy controls. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;183:168–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes RA, Donofrio P, Bril V, et al. Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:136–144. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70329-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stangel M, Pul R. Basic principles of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment. J Neurol. 2006;253(Suppl. 5):V18–24. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-5003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anthony RM, Kobayashi T, Wermeling F, Ravetch JV. Intravenous gammaglobulin suppresses inflammation through a novel T(H)2 pathway. Nature. 2011;475:110–113. doi: 10.1038/nature10134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klehmet J, Goehler J, Ulm L, et al. Effective treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins reduces autoreactive T-cell response in patients with CIDP. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307708. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cats EA, van der Pol WL, Piepers S, et al. Correlates of outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. Neurology. 2010;75:818–825. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f0738e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]