Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1500.

Hit for six

Summary of rapid responses

Birte Twisselmann 1
PMCID: PMC428561

Abbasi and Khan's analysis of the effects of Pakistan batsman Javed Miandad's dramatic match-winning six off the last ball in a one day match that his side had looked like losing to India until that delivery, resulted in an unusually high number of responses.1 Most of the more than 70 correspondents were united that the paper was entirely misplaced in a medical journal and should have encountered the same fate as most other submitted manuscripts.

Some even argued that it showed “laddishness” at the BMJ. Others additionally criticised the chosen statistical analysis as unsuitable or pointed out the lack of confounders.

Cricket fans engaged in mostly humorous, but none the less detailed, descriptions and discussions about the various merits of India's and Pakistan's teams, the achievements of individual players, and the potentially tremendous benefits of various kinds of large scale sporting events for the health (or psyche) of a nation.

Competing interests: BT grew up in Germany, a country not known for its cricketing talent. She therefore has not a clue what most correspondents are talking about but remains fascinated by the terminology.

References


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES