Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2015 Jan 6;66(2):579–592. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru490

Plant defence responses in oilseed rape MINELESS plants after attack by the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae

Ishita Ahuja 1, Nicole Marie van Dam 2, Per Winge 1, Marianne Trælnes 1, Aysel Heydarova 1, Jens Rohloff 1, Mette Langaas 3, Atle Magnar Bones 1,*
PMCID: PMC4286410  PMID: 25563968

Highlight

The larvae of Mamestra brassicae feed less and show reduced growth on plants with ablated myrosin cells, which raises questions about the role of defence cells in Brassicaceae plants.

Key words: Brassica napus (oilseed rape), defence cells, generalist, glucosinolate, jasmonates, myrosinase, plant–insect interaction, transcriptional profiling.

Abstract

The Brassicaceae family is characterized by a unique defence mechanism known as the ‘glucosinolate–myrosinase’ system. When insect herbivores attack plant tissues, glucosinolates are hydrolysed by the enzyme myrosinase (EC 3.2.1.147) into a variety of degradation products, which can deter further herbivory. This process has been described as ‘the mustard oil bomb’. Additionally, insect damage induces the production of glucosinolates, myrosinase, and other defences. Brassica napus seeds have been genetically modified to remove myrosinase-containing myrosin cells. These plants are termed MINELESS because they lack myrosin cells, the so-called toxic mustard oil mines. Here, we examined the interaction between B. napus wild-type and MINELESS plants and the larvae of the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae. No-choice feeding experiments showed that M. brassicae larvae gained less weight and showed stunted growth when feeding on MINELESS plants compared to feeding on wild-type plants. M. brassicae feeding didn’t affect myrosinase activity in MINELESS plants, but did reduce it in wild-type seedlings. M. brassicae feeding increased the levels of indol-3-yl-methyl, 1-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl, and total glucosinolates in both wild-type and MINELESS seedlings. M. brassicae feeding affected the levels of glucosinolate hydrolysis products in both wild-type and MINELESS plants. Transcriptional analysis showed that 494 and 159 genes were differentially regulated after M. brassicae feeding on wild-type and MINELESS seedlings, respectively. Taken together, the outcomes are very interesting in terms of analysing the role of myrosin cells and the glucosinolate–myrosinase defence system in response to a generalist cabbage moth, suggesting that similar studies with other generalist or specialist insect herbivores, including above- and below-ground herbivores, would be useful.

Introduction

The presence of the dual ‘glucosinolate–myrosinase’ system is a distinctive characteristic of the Brassicaceae family. Glucosinolates (β-thioglucoside-N-hydroxysulfates) are well known plant secondary metabolites that comprise a diverse group of sulfur-rich compounds and occur mainly in the order Brassicales (Bones and Rossiter, 1996; Kliebenstein et al., 2005; Hopkins et al., 2009; Sønderby et al., 2010). Though the intact glucosinolates are shown to provide resistance to insect herbivores, their defensive potential is increased upon hydrolysis by the enzyme myrosinase (β-thioglucosidases; E.C. 3.2.1.147) (Kim and Jander, 2007; Ahuja et al., 2010; Björkman et al., 2011). Glucosinolate hydrolysis by myrosinases produces a range of compounds such as isothiocyanates, nitriles, epithionitriles, and oxazolidine-thiones, depending upon the glucosinolate structure, specifier proteins, and reaction conditions (Rask et al., 2000; Rohloff and Bones, 2005; Bones and Rossiter, 2006; Wittstock and Burow, 2010). The protein cofactors that affect glucosinolate hydrolysis are epithiospecifiers (ESPs), nitrile-specifiers (NSPs), and thiocyanate-forming proteins (TFPs) (MacLeod and Rossiter, 1985; Lambrix et al., 2001; Bones and Rossiter, 2006; Burow et al., 2009; Kissen and Bones, 2009; Kong et al., 2012).

Myrosinases are present in specialized ‘myrosin cells’ (Bones and Iversen, 1985; Bones et al., 1991; Kissen et al., 2009), which are dispersed throughout plant tissues. Immunocytochemical and in situ hybridization studies carried out on seeds of Brassicaceae species have shown that myrosinases are exclusively present in the myrosin cells of embryonic cotyledons and the radicle periphery (Bones et al., 1991). The roles of myrosin cells and myrosinase have been well documented in several studies (Rask et al., 2000; Kissen et al., 2009; Textor and Gershenzon, 2009; Ahuja et al., 2010).

The programmed cell death of myrosin cells was achieved during the seed development phase by directing the expression of an RNase (barnase) from a cell-specific myrosinase promoter (Borgen et al., 2010). These plants have been named MINELESS because their myrosin cells (toxic mines) have been removed, leading to a dramatic reduction in myrosinase activity in seeds (Ahuja et al., 2011). Additionally, the MINELESS plants have reduced amount of glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products, but higher amount of glucosinolates (Borgen et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2011).

The Lepidopteran insect Mamestra brassicae L. (Noctuidae) is a generalist that feeds on plants from at least 70 species and 22 families, of which members of the Brassicaceae and Chenopodiaceae are among the most preferred (McKinlay, 1992; Rojas et al., 2000; Ulland et al., 2008). It is common in Europe and Asia. Feeding by the caterpillars causes severe damage to the plants, and it is an economically devastating pest in agriculture (Ulland et al., 2008). M. brassicae preference and performance are both affected by glucosinolate content and composition. M. brassicae larvae prefer to feed and perform best on gluconasturtiin-type rather than glucobarbarin-type Barbarea vulgaris plants (van Leur et al., 2008). The larvae are also reported to benefit from a reduction in glucoraphanin, a predominant glucosinolate in Arabidopsis (Beekwilder et al., 2008); and showed reduced performance on B. oleracea plants with high concentrations of the glucosinolate glucoiberin (Poelman et al., 2009). Furthermore, silencing of the foliar myrosinase genes TGG1/TGG2 enhanced growth of M. brassicae larvae after feeding on Arabidopsis plants (Zheng et al., 2011).

Here, we took an exclusive opportunity to study the responses of B. napus wild-type cv. Westar and MINELESS plants after they had been attacked by the larvae of M. brassicae. The aim was to find out what happens in plants that lack defence cells, such as myrosin cells; or in other words what kind of defence responses are regulated in plants with a modified glucosinolate–myrosinase defence system upon attack by the generalist insect herbivore M. brassicae. Since glucosinolate levels were higher and glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products were lower in MINELESS than the wild-type, we also evaluated how M. brassicae larvae develop on wild-type and MINELESS plants. The results are presented as a comparative study of wild-type vs MINELESS plants in response to insect herbivory by larvae of M. brassicae.

Materials and methods

Plant and insect rearing

The B. napus wild-type cv. Westar and MINELESS seeds were germinated in soil (Borgen et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2011), and the plants were grown under greenhouse conditions (S3 security class), with a 16h photoperiod. The day and night temperatures were 21 and 18°C, respectively, at a light intensity of 70–80 μmol m–2 s–1. The eggs of M. brassicae were kept at 21°C/16°C, light 16h/dark 8h.

Insect no-choice feeding experiments

Seven-to-nine-day-old wild-type and MINELESS seedlings were infested with neonate M. brassicae larvae (Cabbage moth; Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University) (Supplementary Table S1). Neonate larvae were weighed to assess their average starting weight and then distributed over pots (four seedlings per pot) of each of the wild-type and MINELESS seedlings. Each seedling was infested with one neonate larvae by placing it on one of the two cotyledons. The larvae were trapped in cages made of opaque plastic sheets. The seedlings were completely enclosed by placing one side of the cage on a pot and covering the other side with a muslin cloth. The experiments were repeated twice. In a first experiment, the insect no-choice feeding assay was performed for 12 days by taking insect weights at four time points (day 3, 8, 10, and 12) (Supplementary Table S1). In a second experiment, the same was performed for 12 days by taking insect weights at two time points (day 7 and 12) (Supplementary Table S1). Larvae were given new seedlings at each time point. The above-ground tissue (cotyledons + hypocotyl) from each seedling was scanned and comprised one biological observation. The area of scanned tissue was calculated with software Compu Eye, Leaf & Symptom Area (Bakr, 2005). To account for the damage to tissue during the experiment, the amount of consumed area was calculated by comparison with the control tissue.

Induction experiment

The effects of larval attack on wild-type and MINELESS seedlings were measured in the following way: 10-day-old M. brassicae larvae were kept on 6–7-day-old seedlings of wild-type and MINELESS, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). In order to retain the larvae, the pots (four seedlings per pot) were enclosed in cages. Controls were treated in the same way, without insects. Pots with control (non-infested) and M. brassicae-infested seedlings were kept under the same conditions. The control and M. brassicae-challenged seedlings were harvested after 24h of infestation. Cages and larvae were removed and the above-ground tissue from seedlings was harvested and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. These samples were homogenized to a fine powder and used for myrosinase activity assays, glucosinolate analysis, microarrays, and qRT-PCR experiments. Fresh tissue was used for extraction of glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products.

Myrosinase activity and protein assays

The extraction of myrosinase and specific myrosinase activity were measured from control and insect-challenged samples following previous methodology (Borgen et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2011). The wild-type and MINELESS seedlings were crushed and the proteins were extracted in 100 µl of imidazole-HCl buffer (10mM, pH 6.0). The myrosinase activity was measured using the GOD-Perid assay, as described previously (Bones and Slupphaug, 1989; Borgen et al., 2010). In order to calculate the specific myrosinase activity, the total protein content of samples was measured using Bradford reagent (BioRad Laboratories, UK). The specific myrosinase activity is described as nmol glucose generated min–1 mg–1 protein.

Glucosinolate analysis

Glucosinolate analysis was performed as described previously (van Dam et al., 2004). Lyophilized, finely ground above-ground tissue was dissolved in 1ml 70% MeOH in water (v/v) in a 2ml Eppendorf tube, vortexed, and immediately boiled for 5min to inactivate any remaining myrosinase. The tubes were placed in an ultrasonic bath for 15min and centrifuged (10min, 10 000rpm). The extraction was repeated for the pellet, but with the boiling step omitted. Both supernatants were combined per sample and applied to a DEAE-Sephadex A 25 column, desulphated with arylsulphatase (Sigma, St. Louis, IL, USA), and separated on a reversed phase C-18 column on HPLC with a CH3CN–H2O gradient. Glucosinolate detection was performed with a Photo Diode Array (PDA) detector (200–350nm) with 229nm as the integration wavelength. Sinigrin (2-propenylglucosinolate) was used as an external standard. The response factors at 229nm from three sources (Buchner, 1987; EC, 1990; Brown et al., 2003) were used to calculate the concentrations of the glucosinolates. Desulphoglucosinolate peaks were identified by comparing HPLC retention times and UV spectra with standards kindly provided by M. Reichelt (MPI Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany) and a certified rape seed standard (Community Bureau of Reference, Brussels, code BCR-367R).

Analysis of glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products

Glucosinolate hydrolysis products were analysed as described previously (Ahuja et al., 2011). The seedlings were crushed with a glass rod in MQ H2O in a 2ml screw-top vial with a PTFE/silicone septum. The mixture was left for 10min at ambient temperature for hydrolysis. A mixture of 0.5ml hexane:dichloromethane (3:2) with an internal standard (12 μg butyl-isothiocyanate) was injected through the septum into the vial, and the sample was vortexed for 50 s. After centrifugation at 3 100rpm for 2min, the solvent phase was pipetted into a 2ml screw-top vial with a PTFE/silicone septum, and concentrated under nitrogen flow to a volume of 50 μl. Agilent 6890/5975 GC-MS (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was used for all analyses. Mass spectra were acquired in EI mode, and a mass range of m/z 39–250 was recorded. The compounds were quantified as described previously (Ahuja et al., 2011).

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, microarray experiments, and data analysis

Microarray experiments were performed to compare the expression profiles of wild-type controls against M. brassicae-challenged wild-type seedlings, and the MINELESS controls against M. brassicae-challenged MINELESS seedlings by taking four biological replicas of each. All procedures were followed as described previously (Kusnierczyk et al., 2008). Statistical analysis was done using R (version 2.10.1), and the Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA) package (Smyth, 2004). The data sets were log-transformed and normalized using the print tip-loess approach. Within-array replicated measurements for the same gene were merged by taking the average between replicates. No background subtraction was performed. Probe-specific dye effects were identified and genes with a strong dye bias were removed. Adjusted P-values were calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg step-up procedure, controlling the false discovery rate. Genes with an adjusted P-value <0.05 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed. To evaluate the difference in responses between M. brassicae-challenged wild-type seedlings and M. brassicae-challenged MINELESS seedlings, a LIMMA contrast analysis was performed using control (non-infested) plants as a common reference. The genes were grouped depending on the biological process with which they are mainly associated using the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) database (http://arabidopsis.org/index.jsp) (Poole, 2008), GenomeNet (http://www.genome.jp), and cited literature. The microarray data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE40932, and are compliant with the MIAME guidelines.

Quantitative PCR

Quantitative PCR was performed as described previously (Kusnierczyk et al., 2011), with minor modifications. The cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA using the QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). The qRT-PCR was carried out using the LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master mix (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed in a LightCycler 480 as follows: (i) Pre-incubation for 5min at 95°C; (ii) 45 amplification cycles consisting of 95°C for 10s, 55°C for 15s, and 72°C for 10s; (iii) 95°C for 5 s, 65°C for 1min, followed by a melting curve analysis by heating from 65°C to 97°C with a ramp rate of 2.2°C s–1. Each 20 μl reaction contained 0.5 μM of each of forward and reverse primer and a cDNA quantity corresponding to 0.05 μg of total RNA. Cp values and melting curves were calculated by the LightCycler 480 analysis programs using the 2nd derivative maximum function and exported in text format. PCR efficiencies were determined employing LinReg PCR (Ramakers et al., 2003). Relative expression ratios were calculated using the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST 2008) (Pfaffl et al., 2002). All biological replicas were tested with each primer set. The primer sequences for Brassica genes representing Arabidopsis homologues (which were regulated in the microarrays) are described and pooled (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

Statistical analysis of feeding experiments

Statistical analyses were performed using R language (R Development Core Team, 2011), and IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. Nonparametric tests were used, since data in general could not be assumed to be normally distributed (based on Anderson-Darling normality tests and quantile-quantile plots). For the no-choice experiments the differences between the insect weight gain of larvae retrieved from the wild-type and MINELESS plants on days 3, 7, 8, 10, and 12 were analysed using Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests, where P < 0.05 was considered significant. For the induction experiments, the levels of myrosinase activity, glucosinolates, and glucosinolate hydrolysis products among four different groups (wild-type control, wild-type M. brassicae, MINELESS control, and MINELESS M. brassicae) were analysed by a non-parametric version of one-way analysis of variance, the Kruskal-Wallis test (where P < 0.05 was considered significant); after being considered significant, they were followed by the pairwise Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests using Bonferroni post hoc correction (where P < 0.0083 is considered significant for six tests). For the myrosinase activity and gluconsinolates, only four observations were available in each group, and using a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test with two groups of four observations each (without ties), the smallest P-value that can be obtained is 0.02857, and thus in our data no pairwise comparisons could be found to be significant after Bonferroni correction (which requires P < 0.0083 when six comparisons are made). For the glucosinolate–myrosinase products, six observations were available in each group and the multicomView R-package (version 0.1–5) was used to categorize the four groups based on significance, as presented in Fig. 6 (http://cran.r-project.org/ and choose package multcompView).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Open in a new tab

Glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis product levels in control and M. brassicae-challenged seedlings (n = 6). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences for 3-butenyl isothiocyanate (3BITC), 1-methyl thiopentane (1MTPe), 1-methyl thiohexane (1MTHx), benzyl nitrile (BNIT), 1-methoxy indole-3yl-methylnitrile (1MI3M NIT), indole-3yl-methylnitrile (I3M NIT), 4-methoxy indole-3yl-methylnitrile (4MI3M NIT), and total glucosinolate hydrolysis products levels (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests and Bonferroni post hoc testing, P < 0.00833). Error bars represent the SE. WC, wild-type control; MC, MINELESS control; WM, wild-type M. brassicae; MM, MINELESS M. brassicae.

Results

M. brassicae larvae show stunted growth on MINELESS plants

The feeding experiments with M. brassicae showed that larvae gained significantly less weight on MINELESS seedlings compared to the wild-type seedlings at all time points: (Experiment I) day 3, 8, 10, and 12, P < 0.001; (Experiment II) day 7 and 12, P < 0.001 (Fig. 1). The average weights of larvae feeding on MINELESS plants were 1.5, 2.2, 4.1, and 3.6 times lower than the average weights of larvae that had been feeding on the wild-type for day 3, 8, 10, and 12, respectively (Experiment I) (Fig. 1A). Similarly, in feeding Experiment II, the average larvae weights were observed to be 2.2 and 2.6 times lower when feeding MINELESS seedlings compared to the wild-type for day 7 and 12, respectively (Fig. 1B). Both experiments showed similar reduction (2.2 times) in larvae weights for day 7 (Experiment II) and day 8 (Experiment I). How larvae feed on wild-type and MINELESS plants, and how they appeared after 12 days of feeding, can be seen in Supplementary Videos V1 and V2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Growth of M. brassicae on wild-type and MINELESS plants in no-choice feeding experiments. (A, B) The weights of larvae feeding on wild-type and MINELESS seedlings differed significantly for day 3, 8, 10, and 12 (A); and day 7 and 12 (B). n, number of larvae. Values represent mean ± SE; ***, P < 0.001 (Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test).

Due to lower weight gain and reduced development, most larvae that had been feeding on MINELESS plants appeared smaller than the larvae from wild-type plants (Fig. 2A–D) (Supplementary Videos V1 and V2). Larvae that had been feeding on MINELESS plants also showed a greater reduction in number compared to the wild-type (Fig. 1). The larvae also attacked MINELESS seedlings less than wild-type seedlings as the MINELESS seedlings were consumed less in comparison (Fig. 2E, F) (Fig. 3). This is consistent with the lower weight of larvae feeding on MINELESS plants (Fig. 1). The first experiment showed that larvae consumed 41.6%, 54.3%, 61.2%, and 31.9% less MINELESS tissue than the wild-type for day 3, 8, 10, and 12, respectively (day 3, 8, 10 and 12; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3A) (Supplementary Fig. S1). Similarly, the second experiment showed this consumption to be 26 % and 60.6% less for MINELESS compared to the wild-type for day 7 (P < 0.0077) and day 12 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Twelve-day-old M. brassicae larvae and M. brassicae-damaged wild-type and MINELESS seedlings. (A, C) Twelve-day-old larvae that have been feeding from day 0–12 on wild-type plants. (B, D) Twelve-day-old larvae that have been feeding from day 0–12 on MINELESS plants. (E, F) M. brassicae-damaged wild-type and MINELESS plants, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

Consumption of wild-type and MINELESS seedlings during M. brassicae no-choice feeding experiments. (A, B) Tissue consumed. n, number of seedlings. Values represent mean ± SE; ***, P < 0.001; *, P < 0.01 (Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test).

MINELESS plants show no difference for myrosinase activity after M. brassicae feeding

The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences among the four groups wild-type control, wild-type M. brassicae, MINELESS control, and MINELESS M. brassicae (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). The myrosinase activity was nearly comparable in MINELESS control seedlings and MINELESS M. brassicae seedlings. The myrosinase activity was very low in MINELESS control seedlings (1.85 nmol glucose min–1 mg–1 protein) compared to the wild-type control seedlings (54.4 nmol glucose min–1 mg–1 protein). The feeding by larvae of M. brassicae caused a 41% reduction in myrosinase activity in wild-type seedlings. The pair-wise comparisons of wild-type control vs MINELESS control, wild-type control vs wild-type M. brassicae, and wild-type M. brassicae vs MINELESS M. brassicae showed differences with a P value of 0.02857, except MINELESS control vs MINELESS M. brassicae (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Myrosinase activity in control and M. brassicae-challenged seedlings (n = 4). No pairwise significant differences were found after post hoc Bonferroni corrections (P < 0.00833), but a P value of 0.02857 was observed for all pairwise comparisons except MINELESS control vs MINELESS M. brassicae.

Glucosinolate concentration changes after M. brassicae feeding

Five different glucosinolates were detected in wild-type control as well as MINELESS control seedlings (Fig. 5). These five glucosinolates were (2S)-2-hydroxy-3-butenyl (epiprogoitrin); and the indole glucosinolates indol-3-yl-methyl (I3M) (glucobrassicin), 4-hydroxy-indol-3-yl-methyl (4OH-I3M) (4-hydroxyglucobrassicin), 4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl (4MO-I3M) (4-methoxyglucobrassicin), and 1-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl (1MO-I3M) (neoglucobrassicin). The Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05) showed significant differences among the four groups wild-type control, wild-type M. brassicae, MINELESS control, and MINELESS M. brassicae for 4-hydroxy-I3M, I3M, 1-methoxy-I3M, and total glucosinolates, with levels higher in MINELESS control seedlings compared to wild-type control seedlings (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

Glucosinolate levels in control and M. brassicae challenged seedlings (n = 4). WC, wild-type control; MC, MINELESS control; WM, wild-type M. brassicae; MM, MINELESS M. brassicae. Error bars represent SE. No significant differences were found after post hoc Bonferroni corrections (P < 0.00833).

M. brassicae feeding increased I3M, 1MO-I3M, and total glucosinolate levels in both wild-type and MINELESS seedlings (P = 0.02857); however, 4OH-I3M was observed to be enhanced only in MINELESS seedlings (P = 0.02857) (Fig. 5). The glucosinolate 4OH-I3M was higher in MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings than wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings (P = 0.02857). In contrast, 1MO-I3M was nearly significantly different (P = 0.057) in wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings and MINELESS M. brassicae challenged seedlings.

Glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products vary between wild-type and MINELESS with and without M. brassicae feeding

In total, seven glucosinolate-degradation products could be detected by the solvent extraction of wild-type and MINELESS seedlings (Fig. 6). These compounds were 3-butenyl isothiocyanate (3BITC), 1-methyl thiopentane (1MTPe), 1-methyl thiohexane (1MTHx), benzyl nitrile (BNIT), 1-methoxy indole-3-yl-methylnitrile (1MI3M NIT), indole-3-yl-methylnitrile (I3M NIT), and 4-methoxy indole-3-yl-methylnitrile (4MI3M NIT). The Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05) showed significant differences among the four groups wild-type control, wild-type M. brassicae, MINELESS control, and MINELESS M. brassicae for all compounds except 3BITC. The wild-type control and MINELESS control seedlings differed significantly for 1MTPe, 1MTHx, I3M NIT, 1MI3M NIT, 4MI3M NIT, and for the total glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products (P < 0.05). I3M NIT, 4MI3M NIT, and total glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products were low in MINELESS control seedlings compared to their wild-type control, while 1MTPe and 1MTHx showed higher levels in MINELESS control seedlings (Fig. 6).

M. brassicae feeding significantly increased levels of 1MI3M NIT (P < 0.002) in both wild-type and MINELESS seedlings (Fig. 6E). The wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings differed from MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings for 1MTPe, 1MTHx (P < 0.002), and 4MI3M NIT (P < 0.004) (Fig. 6).

Gene regulation in wild-type and MINELESS plants upon M. brassicae attack

Oligonucleotide microarrays from Arabidopsis were used and the microarray data were validated by qRT-PCR using Brassica-specific sequences corresponding to Arabidopsis genes. B. napus and Arabidopsis are both members of the Brassicaceae family and shared a common ancestor about 13–17 million years ago. This means that orthologous/paralogous gene pairs from these plants have retained high homology to each other even at the DNA level. Previous analyses have shown that 87% of sequences are conserved between B. napus and Arabidopsis (Cavell et al., 1998). The close evolutionary relationship between Arabidopsis and other Brassica spp. means that Arabidopsis microarrays can be used for gene expression studies of Brassica spp. Arabidopsis microarrays have been successfully applied and compared for gene expression studies in Brassica spp. Examples include studies of insect feeding by Pieris rapae in B. oleracea (Broekgaarden et al., 2007), infestation by Brevicoryne brassicae (Broekgaarden et al., 2008), and the identification of plant defence genes in canola (B. napus) (Schenk et al., 2008).

Transcriptional analysis showed 494 genes to be differentially regulated in wild-type seedlings after M. brassicae feeding. Out of these 494 genes, 393 were upregulated (log2 ratio > 0.5; adjusted P ≤ 0.05), and 101 downregulated (log2 ratio < –0.5; adjusted P ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 7A). In contrast, in MINELESS seedlings, after M. brassicae feeding, only 159 genes were found to be significantly regulated. Out of these 159 genes, 129 showed induction (log2 ratio > 0.5; adjusted P ≤ 0.05), while 30 genes showed suppression (log2 ratio < –0.5; adjusted P ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 7B). Comparison of gene expression data of wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings to MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings showed 326 genes to be differentially regulated. Of these, 209 genes showed suppression (log2 ratio < –0.4; adjusted P ≤ 0.05), while the remaining 117 genes showed induction in MINELESS seedlings (log2 ratio > 0.4; adjusted P ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Open in a new tab

Gene regulation in wild-type and MINELESS seedlings after M. brassicae feeding. (A) Up- and downregulated genes in wild-type M. brassicae (WM) seedlings vs wild-type control (WC). (B) Up- and downregulated genes in MINELESS M. brassicae (MM) vs MINELESS control (MC). (C) Up- and downregulated genes in MINELESS MM after comparison of MM seedlings against WM seedlings.

Expression patterns of genes representing jasmonic acid biosynthesis and signalling pathway

Several genes involved in the jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis and signalling pathway were upregulated in wild-type seedlings after M. brassicae attack (Fig. 8) (Supplementary Table S4). B. napus genes encoding homologues of Arabidopsis LOX2, LOX3, LOX4, AOS, AOC2, and AOC3, all involved in the initiation of JA synthesis in plastids, were upregulated. The gene OPCL1, encoding enzyme OPC-8:CoA ligase 1, that esterfies a CoA to the acyl group of OPC-8:0 (Acosta and Farmer, 2010), also showed upregulation in wild-type. Two acyl-coenzyme A oxidase genes, ACX1 and ACX5, and KAT2, involved in (the three cycles of) β-oxidation leading to the production of JA, were also induced. JA insensitive 1 (JIN1/MYC2), which regulates the transcription of JA-responsive genes, was also upregulated. Three JA-responsive genes (JR1, JR2, and JR3) and VSP2 were strongly upregulated. Some of the genes involved in the JA biosynthesis and signalling pathways (LOX2, AOS, and OPCL1) were also upregulated in MINELESS seedlings after M. brassicae attack, although their regulation was relatively low compared to gene regulation in the wild-type (Fig. 8) (Supplementary Table S5). After M. brassicae attack on MINELESS seedlings, the genes that were most induced were homologues of AOS, LOX2, OPCL1, VSP2 JR1, and JR2. Only one gene, encoding JAZ9, was detected as induced in MINELESS seedlings after M. brassicae attack compared to the wild-type seedlings, where six JAZ genes had showed induction (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Open in a new tab

Regulation of genes involved in the jasmonic acid (JA) pathway and JA responsiveness after M. brassicae feeding. The colour scale represents log2-transformed gene expression ratios. The grey boxes represent non-regulated genes. More detailed information about genes is given in Supplementary Tables S4, S5, and S6. Abbreviations: MM-MC, MINELESS M. brassicae challenged vs MINELESS control; WM-WC, wild-type M. brassicae challenged vs wild-type control; MM-WM, MINELESS M. brassicae challenged vs wild-type M. brassicae challenged.

A comparison of M. brassicae-challenged MINELESS seedlings to M. brassicae-challenged wild-type seedlings showed that the JA responses were stronger in wild-type seedlings compared to MINELESS seedlings. B. napus genes homologous to LOX4, AOS, AOC2, AOC3, OPCL1, ACX1, ACX5, KAT2, JAZ1, JAZ2, JAZ3, JAZ9, JR2, JR3, and VSP2 showed lower induction or downregulation in MINELESS seedlings compared to the wild-type seedlings. (Fig. 8) (Table S6).

Expression patterns of genes representing pathways of tryptophan biosynthesis and indole glucosinolate biosynthesis

The attack by M. brassicae on wild-type plants resulted in upregulation of B. napus gene homologues of Arabidopsis ASA1, TRP1, IGPS, TSA1, TSB1, TSB2, and TSB3, which are involved in tryptophan biosynthesis from chorismate (Fig. 9) (Supplementary Table S4). In contrast, MINELESS seedlings only showed induction of ASA1, TRP1, IGPS, and TSA1 after M. brassicae attack (Fig. 9) (Supplementary Table S5). The comparison of wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings to MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings showed that genes corresponding to ASA1, IGPS, TSA1, TSB1, and TSB2 were downregulated or less affected in MINELESS seedlings (Fig. 9) (Supplementary Table S6).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Open in a new tab

Regulation of genes involved in tryptophan and glucosinolate (GSL) biosynthesis pathways after M. brassicae feeding. The colour scale represents log2-transformed gene expression ratios. The grey boxes represent non-regulated genes. More detailed information about genes is given in Supplementary Tables S4, S5, and S6. Abbreviations: MM-MC, MINELESS M. brassicae challenged vs MINELESS control; WM-WC, wild-type M. brassicae challenged vs wild-type control; MM-WM, MINELESS M. brassicae challenged vs wild-type M. brassicae challenged.

The following indole glucosinolate core pathway genes showed upregulation in wild-type seedlings upon M. brassicae feeding: CYP79B2, CYP79B3, and CYP83B1, encoding cytochrome P450 proteins, and GSTF9, GGP1, and SUR1, involved in the biosynthesis of I3M glucosinolate from tryptophan (Fig. 9) (Supplementary Table S6). CYP81F4 was strongly upregulated in wild-type seedlings after M. brassicae attack. CYP81F4 has been reported to be responsible for the production of 1MOI3M glucosinolate (Pfalz et al., 2011), which is produced through a hydroxylation reaction of the glucosinolate indole ring leading from I3M to the 1-hydroxy-indol-3-yl-methyl (1-OH-I3M) glucosinolate intermediate. The 1-OH-I3M glucosinolate intermediate is converted to 1MOI3M by either indole glucosinolate methyltransferase 1 (IGMT1) or IGMT2. In wild-type seedlings, IGMT5 was induced after M. brassicae feeding. IGMT5 shares 70% of its sequence identity with IGMT1 and IGMT2 (Pfalz et al., 2011). The B. napus homologues of CYP79B2, CYP79B3, CYP83B1, GSTF9, and SUR1, all key genes in glucosinolate biosynthesis, showed moderate to strong upregulation in MINELESS seedlings upon M. brassicae feeding (Fig. 9) (Supplementary Table S5). The comparison of wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings to MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings showed that B. napus homologues of CYP79B2, CYP79B3, CYP83B1, GSTF9, SUR1, CYP81F4, and IGMT5 were downregulated in MINELESS seedlings compared to wild-type seedlings (Fig. 9) (Supplementary Table S6).

Validation of genes belonging to JA biosynthesis and indole glucosinolate pathways using qPCR

A subset of genes belonging to JA and glucosinolate pathways that were differentially regulated in wild-type and MINELESS seedlings after M. brassicae feeding were selected for qPCR analysis. Based on the Arabidopsis gene information, locus gene IDs, gene sequences, and microarray probe sequences, the corresponding B. napus gene homologues were identified, and these DNA sequences were used to design B. napus-specific primers (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). For wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings, the expression patterns of seven genes, LOX3, AOS, and VSP1 (JA-biosynthesis and signalling), CYP79B2, SUR1, CYP83B1, and CYP81F4 (indole glucosinolate biosynthesis), corresponded well to the profiles obtained from microarray data (Fig. 10A). Similarly, for MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings, the expression patterns of five genes, AOS, VSP1, CYP79B2, SUR1, and CYP83B1 matched well with the patterns obtained from microarray data (Fig. 10B). The qRT-PCR validation of three genes from wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings compared to MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings also showed correspondence with gene expression profiles obtained from microarray data (Fig. 10C).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Open in a new tab

qRT-PCR analyses of genes (log2 ratios) belonging to jasmonic acid (JA), and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathways from control and M. brassicae-challenged seedlings. (A) Wild-type M. brassicae vs. wild-type control. (B) MINELESS M. brassicae vs. MINELESS control. (C) MINELESS M. brassicae vs. wild-type M. brassicae. Information about Brassica genes (with Arabidopsis homologues) is given in Supplementary Table S2 and the primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table S3. Transcript levels were normalized to NADH measured in the samples. Values are means of four independent biological replicas.

Discussion

Based on insect no-choice feeding experiments, we found that M. brassicae (a generalist) larvae show reduced growth and less preference for MINELESS seedlings compared to the wild-type seedlings (Fig. 1) (Supplementary videos V1 and V2). Accordingly, we observed that M. brassicae larvae consumed more of wild-type cotyledons than MINELESS seedlings (Figs 2–3, Supplementary Figure S1). Additionally, the data showed a reduction in survival rate of larvae on MINELESS compared to the wild-type during their development period from 3 to 12 days (Fig. 1). The MINELESS plants seemed to be more resistant to M. brassicae herbivory compared to the wild-type as larvae either developed more slowly or died on MINELESS plants. This could be due to high glucosinolate levels (Fig. 5), or to the presence of new glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products, 1MTPe and 1MTHx (Fig. 6), which were 36.5- and 38.8-fold higher in the MINELESS control compared to the wild-type control. The detection of high amounts of these compounds particularly in MINELESS seedlings is interesting as we have not found these compounds before in MINELESS seeds or seedlings (Borgen et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2011; Borgen et al., 2012). 1 MTPe has been detected in B. napus and B. oleracea (Romanesco cauliflower) (Tollsten and Bergström, 1988; Valette et al., 2003), and 1MTHx in seeds of Prunus domestica (Ahmed et al., 2007).

Plants show a diverse range of defences that may vary in effectiveness against generalist and specialist insect herbivores (Ahuja et al., 2010; Ali and Agrawal, 2012; Poelman et al., 2008). The results from previous insect feeding experiments with Arabidopsis myrosinase mutants seem to vary for generalist and specialist herbivores. In that study, the weight of Trichoplusia ni larvae was significantly increased on tgg1 tgg2 mutants, while the specialist Pieris rapae performed better on the wild-type than on tgg1 tgg2 mutants, which has been considered to be due to reduced feeding stimulants (glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products) in tgg1 tgg2 mutants. Our results of challenging myrosinase-mutated MINELESS plants to M. brassicae can be seen as somewhat similar to the response of P. rapae to tgg1 tgg2 mutants (Barth and Jander, 2006), as myrosinase-mutated MINELESS plants also have reduced feeding stimulants (glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products) (Ahuja et al., 2011). The authors speculated about the possibility that the Arabidopsis double mutant tgg1 tgg2 could produce another deterrent to compensate for the loss of glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products (Barth and Jander, 2006). Additionally, it is worth mentioning that even if M. brassicae is not a specialist, it has some association or preference for cruciferous crops (Bretherton et al., 1979; Rojas et al., 2000; Beekwilder et al., 2008; Ploomi et al., 2009), further highlighting that M. brassicae may be a specialist for Brassica plants and not a generalist. Furthermore, an approximate 4-fold difference in myrosinase activity among lines of B. juncea decreased feeding by Plutella xylostella (a crucifer specialist) on the lines with highest activity relative to the lowest, but there was no difference in feeding by Spodoptera eridania (a generalist) (Li et al., 2000). In another similar observation, in B. rapa populations that were artificially selected for divergent myrosinase levels (~2.5-fold higher), the high myrosinase population was more resistant to the flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae than the low myrosinase population (Siemens and Mitchell-Olds, 1998). On the other hand, variation in myrosinase levels had no effect on the feeding behaviour of Brevicoryne brassicae on Arabidopsis (Barth and Jander, 2006) or Athalia rosae on Sinapis alba (Müller and Sieling, 2006; Travers-Martin and Müller, 2007).

The myrosinase activity in wild-type seedlings was almost in the same range as it has been reported previously for B. napus hypocotyls (Bones, 1990). In recent years, some non-traditional myrosinases (glucosidases) have been reported to degrade indole glucosinolates (Bednarek et al., 2009; Clay et al., 2009; Bednarek et al., 2011). This indicates that there might also be such glucosidases in B. napus. If present, where these are potentially acting is still unknown. The standard myrosinase assay revealed low myrosinase activity in MINELESS, and analysis of glucosinolate hydrolysis products clearly shows low concentrations, which could be taken as a measure that if such non-traditional myrosinases are present, they are less active than the traditional thioglucosidases.

Myrosinase activity was reduced by M. brassicae feeding in wild-type seedlings, but not in MINELESS seedlings. The latter was not surprising as the myrosinase activity in non-challenged MINELESS seedlings is extremely low. Previous studies on myrosinase activity in response to herbivores have also reported a net decline in activity, for example after A. rosae feeding on B. juncea (Müller and Sieling, 2006) and P. xylostella feeding on B. napus (Pontoppidan et al., 2005). These studies showed decreases in soluble activity, which were also observed for the wild-type after M. brassicae feeding. On the other hand, some studies revealed induction or increases in myrosinase activity after herbivore attack by B. brassicae on wild-type and MINELESS seedlings (Borgen et al., 2012) and, for example, by P. xylostella on B. rapa and by A. rosae on S. alba (Martin and Müller, 2007; Travers-Martin and Müller, 2007). Moreover, Textor and Gershenzon mentioned in a review that there is no general induction of myrosinase activity after herbivory, but that it instead triggers the appearance of various associated proteins, the functions of which remain to be explained (Textor and Gershenzon, 2009).

In this study, the total glucosinolate levels were observed to be higher in MINELESS control seedlings relative to wild-type control seedlings. Moreover, in our previous studies, we have shown the total glucosinolate levels to be higher in MINELESS control (non-infested) seeds than wild-type control seeds and seedlings (Borgen et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2011; Borgen et al., 2012). Glucosinolates form a constitutive defence (Wittstock and Gershenzon, 2002), but it is also evident that these compounds accumulate in response to wounding or herbivory (Doughty et al., 1995; Bartlet et al., 1999; Brader et al., 2001; Mikkelsen et al., 2003). A variety of glucosinolates are required to limit the growth of various insect herbivores (Gols et al., 2008; Müller et al., 2010). Gols and colleagues found a negative relationship between the total levels of glucosinolates and survival of M. brassicae larvae, proposing that M. brassicae responds to high levels of glucosinolates rather than to specific glucosinolates (Gols et al., 2008). The levels of three glucosinolates (4OH-I3M, I3M, and 4MO-I3M), although non-significant, showed more elevation in MINELESS control seedlings compared to the wild-type seedlings. At the same time, MINELESS showed low myrosinase activity, which meant that more glucosinolates were intact, giving the seedlings higher glucosinolate levels (Borgen et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2011; Borgen et al., 2012), which probably also affects the growth of M. brassicae larvae. The levels of most of the indole glucosinolates were increased in both wild-type and MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings. Similarly, indole glucosinolate biosynthesis genes (CYP79B2, CYP79B3, SUR2, SUR1, and GSTF9), also showed upregulation in both wild-type and MINELESS after M. brassicae feeding. The genes CYP79B2 and SUR2, catalysing the conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetaldoxime (IAOx), also showed induction in B. oleracea and Arabidopsis after P. rapae feeding (Reymond et al., 2004; Broekgaarden et al., 2008). Similar responses for these genes have also been observed in Arabidopsis ecotypes upon feeding by aphids Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae (Kusnierczyk et al., 2007). An induction of genes of the indole glucosinolate pathway, and of indole glucosinolates levels, has frequently been reported as a herbivore response in Brassicaceae and the model plant Arabidopsis (Bodnaryk, 1992; Hopkins et al., 1998; Bartlet et al., 1999; Kusnierczyk et al., 2007; Kusnierczyk et al., 2008; Poelman et al., 2008; Textor and Gershenzon, 2009). CYP81F4 (strongly induced in wild-type seedlings) has been shown to be mainly responsible for the production of 1MO-I3M (Pfalz et al., 2011) (Figs. 9 and 10A). Our results showed a corresponding increase in glucosinolate 1MO-I3M in wild-type seedlings after M. brassicae feeding (Fig. 5), thereby supporting the role of CYP81F4 in production of glucosinolate 1MO-I3M. A very similar trend was also observed for its hydrolysis product 1MI3M NIT (Fig. 6E).

The induction of JA synthesis and signalling pathways, and JA responsive genes, is a well known response to insect attack (Acosta Iván and Farmer Edward, 2010; Ballaré, 2011; Verhage et al., 2011). Genes involved in the biosynthesis of JA are upregulated after feeding by insect herbivores such as P. rapae and P. xylostella (Reymond et al., 2004; Broekgaarden et al., 2007; Ehlting et al., 2008; Kusnierczyk et al., 2011), and JA has been shown to be responsible for Arabidopsis resistance to cabbage looper (T. ni) (Chehab et al., 2011). It is therefore not surprising that key genes involved in JA synthesis and signalling, such as LOX2, AOS, AOC2, OPCL1, OPR1, ACX1, KAT1, MYC2, and several JAZs, were upregulated in wild-type seedlings after M. brassicae feeding. However, in MINELESS seedlings after M. brassicae feeding, only a few genes (LOX2, AOS, OPCL1, and JAZ9) showed upregulation with relatively low induction levels compared to the wild-type (Fig. 8). The regulation of fewer genes of the JA pathway, and their low expression levels in MINELESS compared to the wild-type, could be due to the reduced feeding by M. brassicae larvae on MINELESS plants. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that it could also be due to lower levels of myrosinase and glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products, leading to reduced induction of genes in the JA-signalling pathway in MINELESS plants after attack by M. brassicae larvae.

Conclusions and perspectives

Plant–insect interactions have been studied using the insect herbivore cabbage moth (M. brassicae), and wild-type and MINELESS B. napus plants that lack plant defence cells called myrosin cells, also known as the toxic mustard oil mines. The results showed that M. brassicae larvae chewed more and performed better on wild-type B. napus plants than on MINELESS B. napus plants. The reduced performance of M. brassicae larvae on MINELESS seedlings is possibly due to the higher levels of indole- and total glucosinolates in MINELESS control (non-infested) seedlings. Due to the reduction in myrosinase levels, MINELESS plants have reduced amounts of glucosinolate hydrolysis products. However, the glucosinolate–myrosinase hydrolysis products, 1MTPe and 1MTHx, were observed in very high amounts in MINELESS compared to the wild-type seedlings, which might be affecting preference or feeding behaviour. The results also highlight that M. brassicae, which is a generalist herbivore but has some preference for Brassicaceae plants, can be a specialist for brassicas and not a generalist. As expected, the transcriptional responses showed JA as the key mediator of the defence response towards insect herbivory as several genes involved in the JA biosynthesis pathway, signalling, and JA responsiveness were upregulated in both wild-type and MINELESS seedlings. The genes belonging to tryptophan biosynthesis and indole glucosinolate pathway genes were induced, and the indole glucosinolate levels were elevated by M. brassicae feeding in both types of plants. A much higher induction of 1MO-I3M glucosinolate was observed for M. brassicae in wild-type plants compared with MINELESS plants. The comparison of wild-type M. brassicae and MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings showed a number of genes for JA biosynthesis, signalling, and JA-responsiveness, and tryptophan and glucosinolate biosynthesis, to be downregulated in MINELESS seedlings. The downregulation of genes ASA1, IGPS, TSA1, TSB1, TSB2, CYP79B2, CYP79B3, CYP83B1, GSTF9, and SUR1 in MINELESS brassicae-challenged seedlings compared to the wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings probably leads to lower accumulation of the glucosinolates indolyl-3-yl-methyl, 1-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl, and 4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl with respect to their control (non-infested) seedlings. Moreover, the induction of fewer genes and lower expression levels in MINELESS after M. brassicae feeding compared to the wild-type could be due to less feeding by M. brassicae larvae in comparison to the wild-type, which needs to be explored further. Currently, we are using MINELESS plants as a representative model for studying defence responses against other insect herbivores, including both generalists and specialists, and above- and below-ground herbivores, to get an overview about the role of myrosin cells in plant–insect interactions. We think that performing such studies will provide more information about the importance of plant defence cells in Brassicaceae plants.

Supplementary material

Supplementary data can be found at JXB online.

Supplementary Table S1. Time-line of insect no-choice and induction experiments.

Supplementary Table S2. Selected B. napus genes confirmed by qRT-PCR based on differential regulation in microarray results.

Supplementary Table S3. Primer sequences.

Supplementary Table S4. Regulation of JA biosynthesis, signalling, and JA-responsive genes; and tryptophan and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway genes. This is in wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings, after comparison of these to wild-type control seedlings.

Supplementary Table S5. Regulation of JA biosynthesis, signalling, and JA- responsive genes; and tryptophan and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway genes. This is in MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings, after comparison of these to MINELESS control seedlings

Supplementary Table S6. Regulation of JA biosynthesis, signalling, and JA- responsive genes; and tryptophan and glucosinolate biosynthesis pathway genes. This is in MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings, after comparison of wild-type M. brassicae-challenged seedlings to MINELESS M. brassicae-challenged seedlings

Supplementary Figure S1. Control (non-infested) and M. brassicae-damaged cotyledons of wild-type and MINELESS seedlings from no-choice feeding experiments. (A, E, I, M) Wild-type control cotyledons from day 3, 8, 10, and 12, respectively. (B, F, J, N) Wild-type damaged cotyledons from day 3, 8, 10, and 12, respectively. (C, G, K, O) MINELESS control cotyledons from day 3, 8, 10, and 12, respectively. (D, H, L, and P) MINELESS damaged cotyledons from day 3, 8, 10, and 12, respectively.

Supplementary Video S1. M. brassicae larvae feeding on wild-type plants.

Supplementary Video S2. M. brassicae larvae feeding on MINELESS plants.

Funding

This work was funded by the RCN grants 185173/V40, 175691/I10 and 184146/S10.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data
supp_66_2_579__index.html (1.3KB, html)

Acknowledgements

Torfinn Sparstad, Bente U. Halvorsen, Elisabeth Hyldbakk, Javad Najafi, Pankaj Barah, Mohsen Falahati-Anbaran, and Gregor Disveld are greatly acknowledged for providing necessary technical help with the experiments and introductions to different analyses. M. brassicae eggs were kindly provided by Leon Westerd, Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), The Netherlands. The authors kindly acknowledge Per Harald Olsen for taking excellent pictures/videos of M. brassicae larvae and NTNU Multimedia Centre for mounting videos together. Ralph Kissen and Nancy Bazilchuk are acknowledged for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Acosta IF, Farmer EE. 2010. Jasmonates. The Arabidopsis Book 8, 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed R, Mahmood A, Rashid F, Ahmad Z, Nadir M, Naseer Z, Kosar S. 2007. Chemical constituents of seed (kernel) of Prunus domestica and their insecticidal and antifungal activities. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 11, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahuja I, Borgen BH, Hansen M, Honne BI, Müller C, Rohloff J, Rossiter JT, Bones AM. 2011. Oilseed rape seeds with ablated defence cells of the glucosinolate–myrosinase system. Production and characteristics of double haploid MINELESS plants of Brassica napus L. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 4975–4993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahuja I, Rohloff J, Bones AM. 2010. Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30, 311–348. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali JG, Agrawal AA. 2012. Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends in Plant Science 17, 293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakr EM. 2005. A new software for measuring leaf area, and area damaged by Tetranychus urticae Koch. Journal of Applied Entomology 129, 173–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ballaré CL. 2011. Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals. Trends in Plant Science 16, 249–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barth C, Jander G. 2006. Arabidopsis myrosinases TGG1 and TGG2 have redundant function in glucosinolate breakdown and insect defense. The Plant Journal 46, 549–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartlet E, Kiddle G, Williams I, Wallsgrove R. 1999. Wound-induced increases in the glucosinolate content of oilseed rape and their effect on subsequent herbivory by a crucifer specialist. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91, 163–167. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bednarek P, Pislewska-Bednarek M, Svatos A, et al. 2009. A glucosinolate metabolism pathway in living plant cells mediates broad-spectrum antifungal defense. Science 323, 101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bednarek P, Piślewska-Bednarek M, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Maddula RK, Svatoš A, Schulze-Lefert P. 2011. Conservation and clade-specific diversification of pathogen-inducible tryptophan and indole glucosinolate metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana relatives. New Phytologist 192, 713–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Beekwilder J, van Leeuwen W, van Dam NM, et al. 2008. The impact of the absence of aliphatic glucosinolates on insect herbivory in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 3, e2068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Björkman M, Klingen I, Birch ANE, et al. 2011. Phytochemicals of Brassicaceae in plant protection and human health - Influences of climate, environment and agronomic practice. Phytochemistry 72, 538–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bodnaryk RP. 1992. Effects of wounding on glucosinolates in the cotyledons of oilseed rape and mustard. Phytochemistry 31, 2671–2677. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bones A, Iversen TH. 1985. Myrosin cells and myrosinase. Israeli Journal of Botany 34, 351–375. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bones AM. 1990. Distribution of {beta}-thioglucosidase activity in intact plants, cell and tissue cultures and regenerant plants of Brassica napus L. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 737–744. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bones AM, Rossiter JT. 1996. The myrosinase-glucosinolate system, its organisation and biochemistry. Physiologia Plantarum 97, 194–208. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bones AM, Rossiter JT. 2006. The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates. Phytochemistry 67, 1053–1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bones AM, Slupphaug G. 1989. Purification, characterization and partial amino acid sequencing of ß-thioglucosidase from Brassica napus L Journal of Plant Physiology 134, 722–729. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bones AM, Thangstad OP, Haugen OA, Espevik T. 1991. Fate of myrosin cells - Characterization of monoclonal-antibodies against myrosinase. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 1541–1549. [Google Scholar]
  21. Borgen BH, Ahuja I, Thangstad OP, Honne BI, Rohloff J, Rossiter JT, Bones AM. 2012. ‘Myrosin cells’ are not a prerequisite for aphid feeding on oilseed rape (Brassica napus) but affect host plant preferences. Plant Biology 14, 894–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Borgen BH, Thangstad OP, Ahuja I, Rossiter JT, Bones AM. 2010. Removing the mustard oil bomb from seeds: transgenic ablation of myrosin cells in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) produces MINELESS seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 1683–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Brader G, Tas E, Palva ET. 2001. Jasmonate-dependent induction of indole glucosinolates in Arabidopsis by culture filtrates of the nonspecific pathogen Erwinia carotovora . Plant Physiology 126, 849–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bretherton RF, Goater B, Lorimer RI. 1979. Noctuidae: Noctuinae and Hadeninae. In: Heath J, Emmet AMM, eds. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland , Vol 9 UK: Curwen Books, 120–278. [Google Scholar]
  25. Broekgaarden C, Poelman EH, Steenhuis G, Voorrips RE, Dicke M, Vosman B. 2008. Responses of Brassica oleracea cultivars to infestation by the aphid Brevicoryne brassicae: an ecological and molecular approach. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 1592–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Broekgaarden C, Poelman E, Steenhuis G, Voorrips R, Dicke M, Vosman B. 2007. Genotypic variation in genome-wide transcription profiles induced by insect feeding: Brassica oleracea - Pieris rapae interactions. BMC Genomics 8, 239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Brown P, Tokuhisa J, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J. 2003. Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana . Phytochemistry 62, 471–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Buchner R. 1987. Approach to determination of HPLC response factors for glucosinolates. In: Wathelet JP, ed. Glucosinolates in rapeseed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  29. Burow M, Losansky A, Muller R, Plock A, Kliebenstein DJ, Wittstock U. 2009. The genetic basis of constitutive and herbivore-induced ESP-independent nitrile formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149, 561–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cavell AC, Lydiate DJ, Parkin IAP, Dean C, Trick M. 1998. Collinearity between a 30-centimorgan segment of Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4 and duplicated regions within the Brassica napus genome. Genome 41, 62–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chehab EW, Kim S, Savchenko T, Kliebenstein D, Dehesh K, Braam J. 2011. Intronic T-DNA insertion renders Arabidopsis opr3 a conditional jasmonic acid-producing mutant. Plant Physiology 156, 770–778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Clay NK, Adio AM, Denoux C, Jander G, Ausubel FM. 2009. Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innate immune response. Science 323, 95–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Doughty KJ, Kiddle GA, Pye BJ, Wallsgrove RM, Pickett JA. 1995. Selective induction of glucosinolates in oilseed rape leaves by methyl jasmonate. Phytochemistry 38, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  34. EC. 1990. Determination of the oilseed glucosinolate content by HPLC. Official Journal of the European Communities L170, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ehlting J, Chowrira S, Mattheus N, Aeschliman D, Arimura G-I, Bohlmann J. 2008. Comparative transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana infested by diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae reveals signatures of stress response, secondary metabolism, and signalling. BMC Genomics 9, 154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gols R, Wagenaar R, Bukovinszky T, Dam NMv, Dicke M, Bullock JM, Harvey JA. 2008. Genetic variation in defense chemistry in wild cabbages affects herbivores and their endoparasitoids Ecology 89, 1616–1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hopkins RJ, Griffiths DW, Birch ANE, McKinlay RG. 1998. Influence of increasing herbivore pressure on modification of glucosinolate content of swedes (Brassica napus spp. rapifera). Journal of Chemical Ecology 24, 2003–2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hopkins RJ, van Dam NM, van Loon JJA. 2009. Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 54, 57–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim JH, Jander G. 2007. Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeding on Arabidopsis induces the formation of a deterrent indole glucosinolate. The Plant Journal 49, 1008–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kissen R, Bones AM. 2009. Nitrile-specifier proteins involved in glucosinolate hydrolysis in Arabidopsis thaliana . The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 12057–12070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kissen R, Rossiter J, Bones A. 2009. The ‘mustard oil bomb’: not so easy to assemble?! Localization, expression and distribution of the components of the myrosinase enzyme system. Phytochemistry Reviews 8, 69–86. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Mitchell-Olds T. 2005. The glucosinolate-myrosinase system in an ecological and evolutionary context. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8, 264–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kong XY, Kissen R, Bones AM. 2012. Characterization of recombinant nitrile-specifier proteins (NSPs) of Arabidopsis thaliana: Dependency on Fe(II) ions and the effect of glucosinolate substrate and reaction conditions. Phytochemistry 84, 7–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kusnierczyk A, Tran D, Winge P, Jorstad T, Reese J, Troczynska J, Bones A. 2011. Testing the importance of jasmonate signalling in induction of plant defences upon cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) attack. BMC Genomics 12, 423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kusnierczyk A, Winge P, Jørstad T, Troczynska J, Rossiter J, Bones A. 2008. Towards global understanding of plant defence against aphids-timing and dynamics of early Arabidopsis Ler defence responses to cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) attack. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 1097–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kusnierczyk A, Winge P, Midelfart H, Armbruster WS, Rossiter JT, Bones AM. 2007. Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes with different glucosinolate profiles after attack by polyphagous Myzus persicace and oligophagous Brevicoryne brassicae . Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 2537–2552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Mitchell-Olds T, Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J. 2001. The Arabidopsis epithiospecifier protein promotes the hydrolysis of glucosinolates to nitriles and influences Trichoplusia ni herbivory. The Plant Cell 13, 2793–2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li Q, Eigenbrode SD, Stringam GR, Thiagarajah MR. 2000. Feeding and growth of Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera eridania on Brassica juncea with varying glucosinolate concentrations and myrosinase Activities. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 2401–2419. [Google Scholar]
  49. MacLeod AJ, Rossiter JT. 1985. The occurrence and activity of epithiospecifier protein in some cruciferae seeds. Phytochemistry 24, 1895–1898. [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin N, Müller C. 2007. Induction of plant responses by a sequestering insect: Relationship of glucosinolate concentration and myrosinase activity. Basic and Applied Ecology 8, 13–25. [Google Scholar]
  51. McKinlay RG, ed. 1992. Vegetable crop species. London: McMillan Press. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mikkelsen MD, Petersen BL, Glawischnig E, Jensen AB, Andreasson E, Halkier BA. 2003. Modulation of CYP79 genes and glucosinolate profiles in Arabidopsis by defense signaling pathways. Plant Physiology 131, 298–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Müller C, Sieling N. 2006. Effects of glucosinolate and myrosinase levels in Brassica juncea on a glucosinolate-sequestering herbivore – and vice versa. Chemoecology 16, 191–201. [Google Scholar]
  54. Müller R, de Vos M, Sun J, Sønderby I, Halkier B, Wittstock U, Jander G. 2010. Differential effects of indole and aliphatic glucosinolates on lepidopteran herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 905–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L. 2002. Relative expression software tool (REST(C)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 30, e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pfalz M, Mikkelsen MD, Bednarek P, Olsen CE, Halkier BA, Kroymann J. 2011. Metabolic engineering in Nicotiana benthamiana reveals key enzyme functions in Arabidopsis indole glucosinolate modification. The Plant Cell Online 23, 716–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ploomi A, Jõgar K, Metspalu L, Hiiesaar K, Svilponis E, Kivimägi I, Men’shykova N, Luik A, Sibul I, Kuusik A. 2009. Effect of cultivar on oviposition preference of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Agronomy Research 7, 451–456. [Google Scholar]
  58. Poelman EH, Dam NM, Loon JJA, Vet LEM, Dicke M. 2009. Chemical diversity in Brassica oleracea affects biodiversity of insect herbivores. Ecology 90, 1863–1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Poelman EH, Galiart RJFH, Raaijmakers CE, van Loon JJA, van Dam NM. 2008. Performance of specialist and generalist herbivores feeding on cabbage cultivars is not explained by glucosinolate profiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 127, 218–228. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pontoppidan B, Hopkins R, Rask L, Meijer J. 2005. Differential wound induction of the myrosinase system in oilseed rape (Brassica napus): contrasting insect damage with mechanical damage. Plant Science 168, 715–722. [Google Scholar]
  61. Poole RL. 2008. The TAIR Database. Methods in Molecular Biology 406, 179–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF. 2003. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neuroscience Letters 339, 62–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rask L, Andréasson E, Ekbom B, Eriksson S, Pontoppidan B, Meijer J. 2000. Myrosinase: gene family evolution and herbivore defense in Brassicaceae. Plant Molecular Biology 42, 93–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  65. Reymond P, Bodenhausen N, Van Poecke R, Krishnamurthy V, Dicke M, Farmer E. 2004. A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. The Plant Cell 16, 3132–3147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rohloff J, Bones AM. 2005. Volatile profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana - Putative olfactory compounds in plant communication. Phytochemistry 66, 1941–1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rojas J, Wyatt T, Birch M. 2000. Flight and oviposition behavior toward different host plant species by the cabbage Moth, Mamestra brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 13, 247–254. [Google Scholar]
  68. Schenk PM, Thomas-Hall SR, Nguyen AV, Manners JM, Kazan K, Spangenberg G. 2008. Identification of plant defence genes in canola using Arabidopsis cDNA microarrays. Plant Biology 10, 539–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Siemens DH, Mitchell-Olds T. 1998. Evolution of pest-induced defenses in Brassica plants: Tests of theory. Ecology 79, 632–646. [Google Scholar]
  70. Smyth G. 2004. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3, 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sønderby IE, Geu-Flores F, Halkier BA. 2010. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates - gene discovery and beyond. Trends in Plant Science 15, 283–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Textor S, Gershenzon J. 2009. Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance. Phytochemistry Reviews 8, 149–170. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tollsten L, Bergström G. 1988. Headspace volatiles of whole plants and macerated plant parts of Brassica and Sinapis . Phytochemistry 27, 4013–4018. [Google Scholar]
  74. Travers-Martin N, Müller C. 2007. Specificity of induction responses in Sinapis alba L. and their effects on a specialist herbivore. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33, 1582–1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ulland S, Ian E, Stranden M, Borg-Karlson A-K, Mustaparta H. 2008. Plant volatiles activating specific olfactory receptor neurons of the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Chemical Senses 33, 509–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Valette L, Fernandez X, Poulain S, Loiseau AM, Lizzani-Cuvelier L, Levieil R, Restier L. 2003. Volatile constituents from Romanesco cauliflower. Food Chemistry 80, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  77. van Dam NM, Witjes L, Svatos A. 2004. Interactions between aboveground and belowground induction of glucosinolates in two wild Brassica species. New Phytologist 161, 801–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. van Leur H, Vet L, van der Putten W, van Dam N. 2008. Barbarea vulgaris glucosinolate phenotypes differentially affect performance and preference of two different species of lepidopteran herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34, 121–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Verhage A, Vlaardingerbroek I, Raaijmakers C, Van Dam N, Dicke M, Van Wees SCM, Pieterse CMJ. 2011. Rewiring of the jasmonate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis during insect herbivory. Frontiers in Plant Science 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wittstock U, Burow M. 2010. Glucosinolate breakdown in Arabidopsis: Mechanism, regulation and biological significance. The Arabidopsis Book 8, 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wittstock U, Gershenzon J. 2002. Constitutive plant toxins and their role in defense against herbivores and pathogens. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5, 300–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zheng S-J, Zhang P-J, van Loon J, Dicke M. 2011. Silencing defense pathways in Arabidopsis by heterologous gene sequences from Brassica oleracea enhances the performance of a specialist and a generalist herbivorous insect. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37, 818–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data
supp_66_2_579__index.html (1.3KB, html)
supp_eru490_jexbot139121_file005.pdf (108.6KB, pdf)
Download video file (37.2MB, mp4)
Download video file (38MB, mp4)
supp_eru490_jexbot139121_file004.tif (2.5MB, tif)
supp_eru490_jexbot139121_file001.jpg (644.6KB, jpg)

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES