Skip to main content
Blood logoLink to Blood
letter
. 2015 Jan 8;125(2):410–412. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-10-609461

Future distribution of multiple myeloma in the United States by sex, age, and race/ethnicity

Philip S Rosenberg 1,, Kimberly A Barker 2, William F Anderson 3
PMCID: PMC4287646  PMID: 25573972

To the editor:

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the United States (US), representing 1.4% of all new cancers,1 and is twice as common among African Americans as it is among other racial or ethnic groups.2 Although the absolute burden (or number) of new MM cases per year is expected to be higher in future years because of changes in the demographic profile of the US,3 to date, no study has estimated the future distribution of MM by sex, age, and racial group. Therefore, we constructed such forecasts for 2011 to 2034 using (1) age-specific MM case and population data (from 1993 to 2010) among men and women for non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics of all races, blacks, and Asians or Pacific Islanders (API) obtained from the nationally representative and authoritative SEER 13 Registries Database (November 2013 submission; http://www.seer.cancer.gov/seerstat); (2) age-period-cohort incidence rate forecasting models4,5; and (3) official projections of population sizes produced by the US Bureau of the Census (http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012). We multiply the projected incidence rate (Figure 1A) by the projected population size to estimate the number of new MM cases (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Observed and projected burden of multiple myeloma in the US by sex and race/ethnicity. (A) Age-standardized rates per 100 000 person-years (2000 US Standard Population) by sex and race/ethnic group, as labeled. The dotted line separates the observed data for 1993 to 2010 from the 2011 to 2034 forecast periods. Data points show age-standardized rates based on 3-year age groups and calendar periods. Shaded regions show point-wise 95% confidence intervals. Forecasts are based on age-period-cohort model for each sex and race/ethnic group. (B) Number of new multiple myeloma cases per year in the US, 2011 to 2034, by sex and race/ethnic group, as labeled. (C-F) Distribution of multiple myeloma burden in the US among men (C-D) and women (E-F), by race/ethnicity; observed for 2011 to 2013 and projected for 2032 to 2034, respectively. Panels show pie charts sized in proportion to the total number of new cases per year. Slices show percentage distribution by race/ethnic group.

From 2011 to 2013, there were an estimated 11 200 new MM cases per year in men and 8500 new cases per year in women. For 2032 to 2034, we forecast a total of 18 500 new cases per year in men and 13 700 new cases per year in women (increases of 65% and 61%, respectively). Our models also forecast similarly large increases in new MM cases among Americans ages 64 to 84: 7300 male and 5400 female cases observed per year in 2011 to 2013 increasing by 93% and 91%, respectively, to projected 14 100 male and 10 300 female cases per year in 2032 to 2034. These estimates are very similar to those of Smith et al3 and will be conservative if the MM surveillance definition is expanded.

As we show here, the age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) of MM by sex and race/ethnicity for 1993 to 2010 are stable or slightly increasing (Figure 1A). Similar to the observed ASRs, our projected ASRs for 2011 to 2034, based on age-specific forecasts, are also stable or they slightly increase. In contrast, the number of new MM cases per year is expected to increase substantially over time in each sex and race/ethnic group (Figure 1B), primarily because of the expected changes in the demographic profile of the US. Importantly, in the Census Bureau projections, the black and Hispanic populations will increase much more rapidly than the white population. Consequently, the future distribution of new MM cases is expected to include more minorities. Among men, the percentage of black patients is expected to increase from 19% to 23%, and the percentage of Hispanic patients is expected to increase from 7% to 11% (Figure 1C-D). Smaller shifts are expected among women (Figure 1E-F). Including API, the percentage of MM patients who are racial or ethnic minorities is expected to increase, from 29% to 37% among men and from 34% to 38% among women. Hence, the percentage of patients who are white is expected to decrease from 71% to 63% among men and from 66% to 62% among women.

In sum, to a greater extent in the future than now, MM will primarily be a disease that affects older persons ages 64 to 84 years. Indeed, circa 2032 to 2034, we estimate that 3 of every 4 newly diagnosed MM patients will be aged 64 to 84 years, an increase from ∼2 of every 3 patients diagnosed today. These results highlight the need for more effective MM therapies, especially for patients aged 64 to 84 years, who have a worse prognosis despite recent advances.6-9 Our analyses also suggest for the first time that the percentage of MM patients who are racial or ethnic minorities is expected to increase, from 29% to 37% among men and from 34% to 38% among women. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that future clinical trials should be representative of the patient population, which increasingly will include larger numbers of racial and ethnic minorities.

Authorship

Acknowledgments: This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.

Contribution: P.S.R. developed the statistical methodology and software and designed the study; K.A.B. and W.F.A. assembled SEER 13 data; K.A.B. and P.S.R. assembled population projections; and all authors analyzed results and wrote the letter.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Philip S. Rosenberg, Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Room 7-E-130 MSC 9780, Bethesda, MD 20892; e-mail: rosenbep@mail.nih.gov.

References

  • 1.Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades N, Munshi NC, Anderson KC. Focus on multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(5):439–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Riedel DA, Pottern LM. The epidemiology of multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1992;6(2):225–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2758–2765. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bray F, Møller B. Predicting the future burden of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(1):63–74. doi: 10.1038/nrc1781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anderson WF, Katki HA, Rosenberg PS. Incidence of breast cancer in the United States: current and future trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(18):1397–1402. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111(5):2516–2520. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111(5):2521–2526. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-104984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Improvement in survival of older adults with multiple myeloma: results of an updated period analysis of SEER data. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1600–1603. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wildes TM, Rosko A, Tuchman SA. Multiple myeloma in the older adult: better prospects, more challenges. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(24):2531–2540. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Blood are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Hematology

RESOURCES