Abstract
Tradition considers that mammalian heart consists of about 70% non-myocytes (interstitial cells) and 30% cardiomyocytes (CMs). Anyway, the presence of telocytes (TCs) has been overlooked, since they were described in 2010 (visit http://www.telocytes.com). Also, the number of cardiac stem cells (CSCs) has not accurately estimated in humans during ageing. We used electron microscopy to identify and estimate the number of cells in human atrial myocardium (appendages). Three age-related groups were studied: newborns (17 days–1 year), children (6–17 years) and adults (34–60 years). Morphometry was performed on low-magnification electron microscope images using computer-assisted technology. We found that interstitial area gradually increases with age from 31.3 ± 4.9% in newborns to 41 ± 5.2% in adults. Also, the number of blood capillaries (per mm2) increased with several hundreds in children and adults versus newborns. CMs are the most numerous cells, representing 76% in newborns, 88% in children and 86% in adults. Images of CMs mitoses were seen in the 17-day newborns. Interestingly, no lipofuscin granules were found in CMs of human newborns and children. The percentage of cells that occupy interstitium were (depending on age): endothelial cells 52–62%; vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes 22–28%, Schwann cells with nerve endings 6–7%, fibroblasts 3–10%, macrophages 1–8%, TCs about 1% and stem cells less than 1%. We cannot confirm the popular belief that cardiac fibroblasts are the most prevalent cell type in the heart and account for about 20% of myocardial volume. Numerically, TCs represent a small fraction of human cardiac interstitial cells, but because of their extensive telopodes, they achieve a 3D network that, for instance, supports CSCs. The myocardial (very) low capability to regenerate may be explained by the number of CSCs, which decreases fivefold by age (from 0.5% to 0.1% in newborns versus adults).
Keywords: telocytes, cardiac stem cells, cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, macrophages, lipofuscin granules, Schwann cells, human ageing heart
Introduction
Abundant data exist concerning the estimation of cell number in mammal hearts (a Google Scholar search returns about 14,000 results!). However, the dogma that interstitial cells are more numerous than cardiomyocytes (CMs) is quite popular. The tradition considers that, numerically, the human myocardial pump consists of about 70% non-myocytes (interstitial cells) and 30% CMs [1,2].
Studies by Zak and Nag [3–5] during the 1970s defined and quantified the cellular populations of the adult rat left ventricle. These were based on morphological features using electron microscopy (EM) and gradient centrifugation. The results obtained on specific cardiac regions were further extrapolated to the entire heart and now, it is assumed that CMs represent only 30–40% from total cells in normal heart [6–9]. Five types of non-muscle cells were described using the dissociation of adult heart into single-cell suspensions: endothelial cells, fibroblasts, pericytes, smooth muscle cells and macrophages [4,5].
Now telocytes (TCs) are accepted as a distinct type of interstitial cells (visit http://www.telocytes.com; Wikipedia) in heart [10–29]. FIB-SEM tomography, the most promising approach for 3D imaging at the subcellular level [30] confirmed the existence of cardiac TCs [31]. TCs are featured by their extremely long cellular prolongations (tens to hundreds of μm) termed telopodes (Tps). These Tps have an alternation of very thin segments (below the resolving power of light microscopy) named podomers and dilated portions named podoms. TCs were found in myocardium as a 3D network among the bundles of CMs, blood capillaries, nerve endings and immunoreactive cells [12,18,19,21,31–33]. TCs are key-players in inter(trans)-cellular signalling [18,21]. Beyond the specific ultrastructural ‘portrait’ and immunophenotype or electrophysiological properties [22,34,35], the individuality of TCs (e.g. in comparison with fibroblasts) was shown by the microRNA imprint [36] gene profile [37–39] or proteomics [40]. The so-called interstitial Cajal-like cells described previously (2005–2009) in heart [41–47] correspond more or less to TCs, but nevertheless TCs are not Cajal-like cells. Their characteristics are different from the classical cells of Cajal of the gastro-intestinal tract. In 2010, became obviously that TCs represent a distinct (novel) type of interstitial cells. The shortest definition of TCs is: cells with Tps [21]. A very recent review ‘Telocyte revisited’ is available [48].
Telocytes seem to provide support for cardiac stem cells (CSCs) in their niches [11,18]. TCs presumably guide tissue integration of myocardial precursors [32,46] and participate in neoangiogenesis [49,50]. Recently, Gherghiceanu and Popescu [18,51] described heterocellular junctions formed by TCs with CSCs or CMs or other interstitial cells in the rat and human adult heart. Such junctions ‘do not fit the scheme’ [52].
This study investigated the number of interstitial cells in ageing human heart with emphasis on TCs and CSCs. The results suggest that TCs could form an integrative interstitial cardiac system, which may be essential for the decision of CSCs to proliferate, differentiate and maturate into new CMs. However, this capability decreases by ageing.
Materials and methods
Patients
Fourteen patients aged between 17 days and 60 years suffering from heart diseases were recruited from Fuwai Hospital, Beijing. All studied patients who underwent cardiac surgery were of Chinese Han nationality. Patients with syndromic congenital heart diseases (CHD) such as Marfan, Noonan, Holt-Oram, Alagille and CHARGE syndromes, as well as chromosomal abnormalities that are highly associated with CHD (e.g. 21-trisomy or 22q11.2 deletion) were excluded from this study. Patients were divided into three age groups: newborns (five cases); children (four cases); and adults (five cases) (Table 1). The study was performed according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and the terms required by the Research Ethics Committee of The Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; written informed consent was obtained from all participants or relatives.
Table 1.
Group | Sex | Age | Clinical diagnosis |
---|---|---|---|
Newborns | M | 17 days | CHD, TGA, ASD |
F | 6 months | CHD, VSD,ASD,PFO | |
M | 8 months | CHD, ASD,TI | |
M | 8 months | CHD, VSD, PFO, MI | |
M | 8 months | CHD, VSD, DCRV | |
Children | F | 6 years | CHD, ASD |
F | 12 years | CHD, TOF | |
F | 15 years | CHD, VSD | |
M | 17 years | CHD, PS, TI, PH | |
Adults | F | 34 years | CHD, PS |
M | 45 years | CHD, ASD | |
M | 55 years | MS | |
M | 57 years | MS | |
M | 60 years | MS |
CHD: congenital heart disease; TGA: Transposition of the great arteries; ASD: Atrial septal defect; VSD: Ventricular septal defect; PFO: Patent foramen ovale; TI: Tricuspid insufficiency; MI: Mitral insufficiency; DCRV: Double chamber of right ventricle; TOF: Tetralogy of Fallot; PS: Pulmonary stenosis; PH: Pulmonary hypertension; MS: Mitral stenosis.
Electron microscopy
Right atrial appendage fragments used in this study were obtained from CHD patients before cardiopulmonary bypass. Tissue samples were cut into about 1-mm3 fragments and fixed by immersion for 4 hrs in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4 at 4°C. After two baths in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, the samples were post-fixed for 1 hr in 1% OsO4 with 1.5% K4Fe(CN)6 (potassium ferrocyanide-reduced osmium) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, at room temperature. Afterwards, the samples were dehydrated through increasing ethanol and embedded in Epon 812 at 60°C for 48 hrs [44,53]. Semi-thin sections (1-μm thick) were stained with toluidine blue and examined under light microscope Nikon Eclipse E600 (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with charge-coupled device (CCD) AxioCamHRc (Zeiss). Thin sections (50–60 nm) were examined with a Morgagni 286 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at 80 kV. Digital electron micrographs were recorded with Mega View III CCD using iTEM SIS software (Olympus, Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany).
Morphometric analysis
The morphometry was performed on EM images with iTEM SIS software (Olympus, Soft Imaging System) using 300 randomly selected images.
We took into account the state-of-the-art morphometry for better quantitative 3D morphology in cardiac muscle [54].
iTEM SIS software was used to count and measure cells on EM images with low magnifications: 4400×, 7100× and 8900×. Higher magnifications (11,000×, 18,000× and 22,000×) were used to determine subcellular components. Light microscope images (sections stained with toluidine blue) were analysed using ImageJ to determine the interstitial area and diameter of CMs.
All data were statistically analysed and Student's t-test was used to define differences between groups. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as the mean with SD.
Results
Light microscopy of myocardium (Fig. 1) shows that the interstitial area increases progressively with age from 31.3 ± 4.9% in newborns to 33.8 ± 5.6 in children and 41 ± 5.2 in adults (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). As percentage, this would represent a gradual increase in non-myocyte space: about 2% for children and 10% for adults. Also, the number of blood capillaries per mm2 (Table 2) increased several hundreds in children and adults versus newborns (P < 0.001). However, the diameter of capillary lumen was not (at all) changed. Figure 1 shows that the light microscopy (even using of 1-μm sections) does not allow the precise identification of interstitial cell type because of the limited resolving power (0.2 μm). Thus, we used transmission electron microscopy to identify and quantify the interstitial non-CM cells (Table 3, Fig. 2).
Table 2.
Capillaries | Newborns | Children | Adults |
---|---|---|---|
Diameter (μm) | 6.2 ± 1.9 | 6.2 ± 1.6 | 6.5 ± 1.5 |
Density (no/mm) | 910 ± 105 | 1217 ± 171* | 1306 ± 137*,† |
The number significantly increased in children and adults compared with newborns (P < 0.001).
The difference between capillary density in children and adults is not significant (P > 0.05).
Table 3.
Number/mm2 | Newborns | Children | Adults |
---|---|---|---|
Cardiomyocytes | 11,223 ± 2460 | 28,567 ± 5920* | 24,817 ± 3260*,† |
Endothelial cells | 1930 ± 140 | 2340 ± 280* | 2170 ± 210* |
Vascular smooth muscle cells & pericytes | 1014 ± 11 | 958 ± 10‡ | 896 ± 12†,‡ |
Schwann cells | 261 ± 78 | 271 ± 89 | 280 ± 73* |
Fibroblasts | 241 ± 50 | 112 ± 11‡ | 438 ± 56*,§ |
Macrophages | 125 ± 12 | 53 ± 7‡ | 350 ± 17*,§ |
Telocytes | 22 ± 2 | 27 ± 4‡ | 19 ± 3†,‡ |
Putative stem cells | 17 ± 3 | 7 ± 1‡ | 4 ± 1†,‡ |
The number of cells significantly increased in children and adults compared with newborns (P < 0.01).
The number of cells significantly decreased in adults compared with children (P < 0.02).
The number of cells significantly decreased in children and adults compared with newborn group (P < 0.01).
The number of cells significantly increased in adults compared with children (P < 0.001).
Table 3 shows the type of cells counted on EM micrographs and Figures 2–6 show examples of images.
Cardiomyocytes are most numerous cells in (atrial) myocardium (in terms of number/mm2), representing 75.7% in newborns, 88.4% in children and 85.7% in adults. Noteworthy, the differences between newborns and children or adults and between children and adults were statistically significant (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively).
Based on ultrastructural features, we identified at least eight types of interstitial cells (non-CMs) in human atrial myocardium: endothelial cells (Figs 2, 4, 5A), pericytes (Fig. 2 and 5A), vascular smooth muscle cells (Fig. 4), Schwann cells with nerve endings (Figs 4 and 6A), fibroblasts (Fig. 6B), macrophages (Fig. 6C), TCs (Fig. 3, 4, 5A and 6A) and CSCs (Fig. 2, 4A and 5B). Mast cells were also found in human hearts in low number, near blood vessels, and therefore mast cells were not counted. Quantitatively, mast cells represent a non-significant fraction of normal human myocardium [55]. However, the density of mast cells is markedly higher in patients with myocarditis, myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, atherosclerosis, etc., when compared with humans with no cardiac pathology [56].
Cardiomyocytes
Table 4 shows the main morphometric results when various parameters of human atrial CMs were compared as a function of age. Noteworthy, as expected, the diameter (thickness) of CMs from children and adults was similar (13–14 μm), but it was almost double in comparison with newborns. Furthermore, the mean cross-sectional area of children and adult CMs ranges from about 170 to 200 μm2, which is about three times larger than in newborns. Based on our data, it seems that males and females have rather similar CM volumetric data in humans.
Table 4.
Cardiomyocyte | Newborns | Children | Adults |
---|---|---|---|
Diameter (μm) | 7.4 ± 1.8 | 12.7 ± 2.1* | 13.5 ± 2.3*,† |
Cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area (μm2) | 65.1 ± 14.3 | 166.6 ± 55* | 188.3 ± 68.4* |
Nucleus area (%)‡ | 27.1 ± 4.1 | 21.6 ± 5.8§ | 23 ± 5.3§ |
Euchromatin area (%) | 68 ± 9.7 | 62 ± 9.5§ | 65.3 ± 8.2§ |
Mitochondrial area (%) | 31 ± 4.9 | 35.1 ± 7.5* | 27.3 ± 5.1§ |
Myofibril area (%) | 47 ± 8 | 58 ± 8* | 57 ± 12* |
Sarcomere length (μm) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1§ | 1.4 ± 0.3§ |
Caveolae (no/μm)¶ | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.2§ | 0.3 ± 0.02§ |
Lipofuscin granules (%) | – | – | 3.5 ± 0.4 |
The number significantly increased in children and adults compared with newborns (P < 0.01).
The number of cells significantly increased in adults compared with children (P < 0.05).
Cross-sectional area of CMs.
The number significantly decreased in children and adults compared with newborn group (P < 0.05).
Number per μm of plasma membrane length.
Nucleus
After EM examination of several thousands of images of human myocardium of children and adults, we did not find clear images of mitoses. However, very rarely, we found EM aspects of mitoses in the case of a 17-day newborn. Figure 3 shows a CM undergoing mitosis, namely prophase. Table 4 also indicates that CM nucleus has larger cross-sectional area in newborns versus children and adults. Moreover, in newborns, the euchromatic field inside the nucleus (68 ± 9.7) is significantly larger in comparison with children (62 ± 9.5) and adults (65 ± 8.2) (in both cases P < 0.05).
Organelles
We also estimated (Table 4) the relative volumes (percentage of cell volume) of mitochondria, myofibrils, caveolae and lipofuscin granules. As expected, the amount of mitochondria that we found was in the range of 25–30% of cell volume, under (very) good fixation conditions: lower in newborns, higher in children and again lower in adults. Table 4 shows that myofibrils are the most abundant organelle, occupying 50–60% of the cell volume. Their volume is higher in children and adults (∼60%) in comparison with newborns (∼50%; P < 0.01). Sarcomeres with typical banding appeared longer in newborns (1.7 μm) when compared with children and adults respectively (1.4 μm, P < 0.05). Caveolae (surface microvesicles), inpocketings of sarcolemma, were counted: Table 4 indicates that ageing diminishes the number of caveolae per μm of cell membrane length.
Traditionally, it is presumed that lipofuscin pigment granules increase with ageing. Table 4 shows no lipofuscin granules in CMs of newborns and children (estimation on 600 micrographs). We found lipofuscin granules only in adults, where the pigment occupies 3.5 ± 0.4% of cell volume.
Non-cardiomyocyte compartment (interstitial cells)
Figure 7 shows percentage of the main cellular components that occupy interstitium between CMs: endothelial cells (52.2–62.1%), vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes (21.6–28.1%), Schwann cells with nerve endings (6.7–7.2%), fibroblasts (3–10.5%), macrophages (1.4–8.4%), TCs (0.5–0.7%) and putative stem cells (0.1–0.5%). The majority of non-CMs are vascular cells.
Endothelial cells are easily recognized by EM (Figs 2, 4 and 5A). These cells contain few organelles and a large variety of vesicles, caveolae and coated pits involved in endocytosis and transcytosis [57]. The abluminal face of endothelial cells is covered by a basal lamina.
Vascular smooth muscle cells (Fig. 4) surround the endothelial cells. The presence of thin actin filaments with dense bodies and numerous caveolae alternating with dense plaques establish electron microscopic diagnosis [58].
Pericytes (Figs 2 and 5A) represent a type a mural cell, principally located in microvasculature. They occasionally encircle the blood capillaries, but may be found at the level of pre-capillary arterioles and post-capillary venules [59,60]. Pericytes (Fig. 3) showed a large heterochromatic nucleus, small Golgi complex, mitochondria, rough endoplasmic reticulum as well as microtubules and filaments extending in their processes. Pericytes are embedded in the basal lamina of endothelial cells. For practical reasons, pericytes were counted together with vascular smooth muscle cells. Interestingly, Nees [61] suggested that pericyte together with endothelial cells and TCs represent a ‘functional unit’.
Schwann cells (Figs 4 and 6A) surrounding nerve endings were often found in the cardiac interstitium and presented a continuous basal lamina. Their cytoplasm contains few microtubules and no contractile filaments. Schwann cells represent the third numerous population of interstitial cells and their number remained constant in all three groups: newborns, children or adults (Table 3). Nonetheless, non-myelinated nerve processes are plentiful in the myocardium [2].
Fibroblasts (Fig. 6) are very easily and precisely identified by EM. Fibroblasts have a large and pleomorphic cellular body with short processes, an oval and slightly euchromatic nucleus (with 1–2 visible nucleoli), abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum and prominent Golgi complex. Fibroblasts have no external lamina and are usually associated with collagen fibrils. Figure 7 shows that fibroblasts, in adult human myocardium, are only about 10% of non-CM interstitial cells, a percentage comparable with Schwann cells or macrophages.
We cannot confirm that cardiac fibroblasts are the most prevalent cell type in the heart as Porter and Turner [62] assumed, or that cardiac fibroblasts are arranged in sheets and strands that run in parallel with CMs [63].
Myofibroblasts, a ‘fibroblast–smooth muscle cell hybrid’, do not exist or are extremely difficult to find in healthy human heart [64]. However, within days after an injury, myofibroblasts appear in abundance [49,65]. We did not find myofibroblasts in our specimens although the electron microscopic criteria to recognize these cells are quite simple.
Macrophages (Fig. 5) were identified based on their numerous endocytotic vesicles and lysosomes. Macrophages represent below 10% of interstitial cells in human adult myocardium (Fig. 7). Sometimes, in ultrastructural studies, the cardiac macrophages are overlooked [e.g. ref. [2]] although they are protagonist immune cells and other experimental methods showed that cardiac macrophages increase during disease [66,67].
Telocytes are shown in Figures 2, 4, 5 and 6A and their ultrastructural morphometry in Table 5. TCs were recognized based on the short definition: ‘cells with Tps’ [16,21,48]. These Tps are very long processes (several tens of micrometres), which are convoluted and have a dichotomic branching pattern. Tps show (on ultrathin sections) an alternance of thin segments called podomers and dilated segments named podoms (Table 5). The latest contain mitochondria and elements of endoplasmic reticulum. TCs have a small cell body (Table 5) containing an oval/round nucleus, which is slightly heterochromatic. The rim of cytoplasm surrounding the nucleus accommodates mitochondria (their number depending on age), endoplasmic reticulum cisternae and a small Golgi complex.
Table 5.
Newborns | Children | Adults | |
---|---|---|---|
Cell body diameter (μm) | 5.7 ± 2.6 | 6.5 ± 3* | 5.7 ± 2.3 |
Nucleus (euchromatin area %) | 49 ± 9.3 | 52 ± 8.5* | 48 ± 7.9 |
Mitochondrial area (%) | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.9† | 2 ± 0.8† |
Telopode (thickness μm) | |||
Podomers | 0.1 ± 0.04 | 0.1 ± 0.05 | 0.1 ± 0.06 |
Podoms | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.90 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
Caveolae (number/μm) | 0.82 ± 0.25 | 1.02 ± 0.46 | 1.30 ± 0.62‡ |
Extracellular vesicles number§ | 3 ± 1 | 5 ± 2* | 2 ± 1 |
The number significantly increased in children compared with newborns (P < 0.02).
The number significantly decreased in children and adults compared with newborn group (P < 0.01).
The number significantly increased in adults compared with newborns (P < 0.01).
The number of extracellular vesicles found around the telocyte within a distance of 0.5 μm from cell membrane.
Numerically, we found that TCs represent a small fraction of human cardiac interstitial cells in the range of 0.5–1%. However, two things should be considered. Firstly, TCs are more numerous than CSCs and secondly, because of their extensive Tps, TCs are occupying a volume fraction much larger than their cell bodies.
Putative stem cells (Figs 2, 4A and 5B) were considered all cells without any distinctive features, with a large nucleus, small number of mitochondria, few endoplasmic reticulum cisternae and numerous free ribosomes (Fig. 5B). The CSCs have no prolongations. The stem cells that we are describing here share similar properties with cardiac cells derived from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells [68]. We found that the putative stem cells represent only 0.01% and 0.1% from total atrial CMs in adults and newborns, respectively (Table 3). If we consider only interstitial cells (Fig. 7), the number of stem cells is decreased fivefold by age (from 0.5% to 0.1%) in newborns versus adults, respectively.
Discussion
Our results (Figs 2–6) show that the human heart fragments (taken from atrial appendages) were properly fixed for transmission electron microscopy. No ‘empty’ spaces were found inside CMs. Normal CMs, as well as interstitial cells (Table 3), were easily identified. Table 4 shows that the characteristic morphological features of normal human CMs were preserved: (i) the mean cross-sectional area of CMs is about 180 μm2; (ii) myofibrils are the most abundant organelles, occupying approximately 50–60% of cytoplasm; (iii) sarcomere length is about 1.5 μm; (iv) mitochondria are aligned in rows between myofibrils and occupy 25–35% of CM cytoplasm; and (v) the nucleus is prominent with the predominance of active, euchromatin [2,69–71].
Is the human myocardium a post-mitotic pump?
From the point of view of organ biology, the cardiac muscle is considered a post-mitotic entity. It has been difficult to establish whether we are limited to the CMs we are born with or if CMs are generated also later in life [72]. Counting of CMs in different species is problematic and, moreover, the traditional methods used to study CMs proliferation have a number of limitations [73]. Although contradictory results were reported [72,74–83], now the dominant idea is that the majority of CMs are terminally differentiated because of irreversible cell cycle arrest [84]. In humans, post-natal CM growth is primarily hyperplastic for the first months after birth [85] (see also Table 3 and Fig. 3 showing mitosis in myocardium of a 17-day newborn). After several weeks/months, CMs exit the cell cycle and terminally differentiate by hypertrophic growth, which may coincide with CMs binucleation. Indeed, as Gerdes [2] also reported, we have never observed single example of a dividing myocyte nucleus in human adult heart, despite extensive screening of whole tissue.
Cell modifications during ageing
Light microscopy (Fig. 1) showed that interstitial area (non-myocytic space) increased progressively with age, presumably because of accumulation of extracellular matrix and proliferation of interstitial cells, primarily fibroblasts and macrophages. The interstitial compartment increased in adults versus newborns with about 10%. It is also to be mentioned that the number of blood capillary increased (per mm2) (Table 2) several hundreds in children and adults versus newborns, although the capillary lumen did not increase.
Cardiomyocytes
An important finding of our results is that CMs are the most numerous cells in myocardium (in terms of number/mm2) representing 76%, 88% and 86% in newborns, children and adults respectively. This is in contradiction with the fact that non-myocytes were supposed to make up over 75% of total number of cells in heart [2].
Table 4 shows for comparison, the main morphometric parameters of CMs as a function of age. The diameter (thickness) of human adult CMs (14–15 μm) is in full agreement with the accepted data [86]. Noteworthy, the diameter of CMs in newborns was only one half (7.5 μm). The smaller radius might reflect more intense metabolic exchanges. Moreover, the radius increase in children may be the result of the transition from hyperplasia (the first few weeks/months) to hypertrophy (early childhood).
The area occupied by mitochondria in CMs is maximum in children and decreases gradually during the adult life. The high content of mitochondria (presumably the highest among the human cells) explains the fact that CM is the most physically energetic cell in body, contracting constantly, without tiring, 3 billion times or more in an average human lifespan [87].
The area occupied by myofibrils remains constant in children and adults, but significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in newborns. The number of caveolae is significantly lower in adults versus newborns or children suggesting modifications of Ca2+ movements as caveolae together with sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria represent Ca2+-releasing/accumulating units [58].
Last but not least, we did not find lipofuscin pigment granules in CMs of newborns and children (Table 4). The absence of lipofuscin (‘wear and tear pigment’) in newborns and children indicates that ageing starts during adulthood.
Interstitial cells (non-CMs)
Table 3 shows that numerically non-CMs represent less than 10% of the total cell population. Most of these non-CMs are vascular cells (endothelial cells, pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells).
Schwann cells (Fig. 7) surrounding unmyelinated nerve endings represent about 7% of total interstitial (non-myocytic) cells, which is an unexpected fact. Usually, the Schwann cells have been overlooked, at least in ultrastructural studies. It is noteworthy that, the number of Schwann cells remains constant during life (Fig. 7).
In recent years, the dynamic and complex interactions of fibroblasts with CMs have become a focus of investigation [88]. However, our findings (Table 3) do not support the concept that fibroblasts are the most numerous cell type in the normal adult heart [89,90] and account for about 20% of the myocardial volume [7]. Also, we could not find evidence for the supposition [91] that the normal adult heart contains 70% non-CMs, of which the majority is cardiac fibroblasts. If we think that fibroblasts are normal cells, producing collagen fibrils and some components of extracellular matrix, then the results mentioned above appear questionable.
Figure 7 shows that the number of fibroblasts ( of intercellular non-myocytic cells) is less than 5%. However, in adults, fibroblasts may represent about 10% of intercellular cells. This fact could be ascribed to various injuries to adult heart that result in a degree of fibrosis. Myofibroblasts could be the apex of the fibrotic phenotype and the principal source of the extensive extracellular matrix [92]. Undoubtedly, the ageing enlarges the intercellular spaces (Fig. 1).
Figure 7 shows that the number of macrophages is at least two times higher in newborns in comparison with children. This result could be expected as cardiac macrophages presumably provide the necessary signals to drive angiogenesis and regeneration of the neonatal mouse heart [93]. The significant increase in macrophage number in adult myocardium (about 8% of interstitial cells) might be ascribed to various antigenic aggressions during adulthood. However, the conventional EM cannot discriminate between the diverse functional subpopulations of resident macrophages in the adult heart. For instance, Epelman et al. [94] identified four subpopulations of cardiac macrophages, based on different cell surface markers.
Although the number of TCs decreases significantly in adults versus children (Fig. 7), no considerable ultrastructural changes were found (Table 5). For example, the total area of mitochondria is decreased and the number of caveolae is higher. The thickness of podomers and podoms (on sections) remains unchanged. The 3D imaging by FIB-SEM tomography should be used to reveal the actual morphology of Tps during ageing.
In addition, dynamics of cardiac Tps can be influenced in vitro by the proteic composition of the extracellular matrix [29]: the stronger spreading being produced by fibronectin, while the lowest by laminin. Collagen determined the highest dynamics of Tps extensions. Low-level laser stimulation increased telopodal lateral extensions in cell culture [95] and some implications may emerge for low-level laser therapy.
From the morphopathology point of view, TCs appear implicated in at least two diseases. In the isolated atrial amyloidosis, which appears in patients with long-standing atrial fibrillation, Tps surround the amyloid deposits limiting their spreading into the interstitium [96]. In addition, TCs were almost completely absent in fibrotic areas of systemic sclerosis myocardium [97].
Human cardiac stem cells
Nevertheless, we are still at the beginning of a therapeutic revolution for myocardial infarction or heart failure. Many important issues of action of CSCs, long-term engraftment, optimal cell type(s), and dose, route, and frequency of cell administration remain to be resolved and no cell therapy has been conclusively shown to be effective [98–105].
The ‘tandem’ TCs-CSCs apparently challenges the ‘dogma’ that cardiac regeneration/repair of myocardial infarction or heart failure might be performed by CSCs only. Strong arguments against the dogma are provided by comparative biology: the high number of TCs has been found in association with CMs in zebrafish or newt heart [13]. In these species, after amputation of the ventricle apex, the heart regenerates and TCs are the first cells involved in this process [106].
Significant for our subject is that using EM and electron tomography we have found nanoscopic junctions between TCs and CMCs, as well as between TCs and CM progenitors in CSC niches [18]. The intermembrane distance about 10–20 nm, is in the range of macromolecular interactions. In addition, we can mention that in stem-cell niches (in mammals and humans), TCs always do exist in close contacts with stem cells, for example: lungs [107], skeletal muscle [108], skin dermis [109], meninges and choroid plexus [110], limbus and uvea of eye [111] or liver [112,113].
In conclusion, our studies (e.g. Fig 5B) underline the fact that TCs and CSCs form a structural and functional unit, a ‘tandem’ [11,18,48]. This suggests that preconditioning of CSCs with TCs could be useful before or during cell transplantation.
Last but not least, the number of CSCs (interstitial space) decreases fivefold from newborns to adults (Fig. 7). This may explain the limited regenerative and/or reparative ability of “adult myocardium”. It seems attractive to use TCs in ways expected to contribute in development of age-intervention protocols [114], especially because proteomics [40] showed a high expression of super oxide dismutase (SODM) in TCs.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number 350/2012 PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0134. Also, authors acknowledge the support of The National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project; 2010CB529505).
References
- 1.Adler CP, Costabel U. Cell number in human heart in atrophy, hypertrophy, and under the influence of cytostatics. Recent Adv Stud Cardiac Struct Metab. 1975;6:343–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gerdes AM. Cardiomyocyte ultrastructure. In: Hill JA, Olsen EN, editors. Muscle: fundamental biology and mechanisms of disease. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 47–55. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zak R. Development and proliferative capacity of cardiac muscle cells. Circ Res. 1974;32:II-17–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nag AC, Zak R. Dissociation of adult mammalian heart into single cell suspension: an ultrastructural study. J Anat. 1979;129:541–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nag AC. Study of non-muscle cells of the adult mammalian heart: a fine structural analysis and distribution. Cytobios. 1980;28:41–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vliegen HW, Van der Laarse A, Cornelisse CJ, et al. Myocardial changes in pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy. A study on tissue composition, polyploidization and multinucleation. Eur Heart J. 1991;12:488–94. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Camelliti P, Borg TK, Kohl P. Structural and functional characterization of cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;65:40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baudino TA, Carver W, Giles W, et al. Cardiac fibroblasts: friend or foe? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H1015–26. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00023.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kohl P, Camelliti P. Fibroblast–myocyte connections in the heart. Heart Rhythm. 2011;9:461–4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Popescu LM, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. Telocytes - a case of serendipity: the winding way from Interstitial Cells of Cajal (ICC), via Interstitial Cajal-Like Cells (ICLC) to telocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:729–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01059.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Cardiomyocyte precursors and telocytes in epicardial stem cell niche: electron microscope images. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:871–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01060.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gherghiceanu M, Manole CG, Popescu LM. Telocytes in endocardium: electron microscope evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2330–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kostin S. Myocardial telocytes: a specific new cellular entity. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:1917–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Popescu LM, Manole CG, Gherghiceanu M, et al. Telocytes in human epicardium. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2085–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01129.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Suciu L, Nicolescu MI, Popescu LM. Cardiac telocytes: serial dynamic images in cell culture. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2687–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01185.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Popescu LM. The tandem: telocytes–stem cells. Int J Biol Biomed Eng. 2011;5:83–92. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Faussone-Pellegrini MS, Popescu LM. Telocytes. BioMol Concepts. 2011;2:481–9. doi: 10.1515/BMC.2011.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Cardiac telocytes - their junctions and functional implications. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;348:265–79. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1333-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rusu MC, Pop F, Hostiuc S, et al. Telocytes form networks in normal cardiac tissues. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:807–16. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng Y, Bai C, Wang X. Telocyte morphologies and potential roles in diseases. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:2311–7. doi: 10.1002/jcp.23022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Popescu LM, Nicolescu MI. Telocytes and stem cells. In: Goldenberg RCdS, de Campos Carvalho AC., editors. Resident stem cells and regenerative therapy. 1st ed. Academic Press/Elsevier; 2013. pp. 205–331. Chapter 11. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sheng J, Shim W, Lu J, et al. Electrophysiology of human cardiac atrial and ventricular telocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:355–62. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yang Y, Sun W, Wu SM, et al. Telocytes in human heart valves. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:759–65. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou J, Wang Y, Zhu P, et al. Distribution and characteristics of telocytes as nurse cells in the architectural organization of engineering heart tissues. Sci China Life Sci. 2014;57:241–7. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4602-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fertig ET, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Extracellular vesicles release by cardiac telocytes: electron microscopy and electron tomography. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1938–43. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smythies J, Edelstein L. Telocytes, exosomes, gap junctions and cytoskeleton: the makings of a primitive nervous system? Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;7:278. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Edelstein L, Smythies J. The role of telocytes in morphogenetic bioelectrical signaling: once more unto the breach. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;7:41. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Díaz-Flores L, Gutiérrez R, García MP, et al. CD34+ stromal cells/fibroblasts/fibrocytes/telocytes as a tissue reserve and a principal source of mesenchymal cells. Location, morphology, function and role in pathology. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29:831–70. doi: 10.14670/HH-29.831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Niculite CM, Regalia TM, Gherghiceanu M, et al. Dynamics of telopodes (telocyte prolongations) in cell culture depends on extracellular matrix protein. MolCell Biochem. 2015;398:157–64. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2215-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kizilyaprak C, Bittermann AG, Daraspe J, et al. FIB-SEM tomography in biology. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1117:541–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-776-1_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cretoiu D, Hummel E, Zimmermann H, et al. Human cardiac telocytes: 3D imaging by FIB-SEM tomography. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:2157–64. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bani D, Formigli L, Gherghiceanu M, et al. Telocytes as supporting cells for myocardial tissue organization in developing and adult heart. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2531–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01119.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bani D, Nistri S. New insights into the morphogenic role of stromal cells and their relevance for regenerative medicine. Lessons from the heart. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:363–70. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Marin A, et al. Telocytes: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and electrophysiological characteristics in human myometrium. Reproduction. 2013;145:357–70. doi: 10.1530/REP-12-0369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cretoiu SM, Radu BM, Banciu A, et al. Isolated human uterine telocytes: immunocytochemistry and electrophysiology of T-type calcium channels. HistochemCell Biol. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s00418-014-1268-0. Doi: 10.1007/s00418-014-1268-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cismasiu VB, Radu E, Popescu LM. miR-193 expression differentiates telocytes from other stromal cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:1071–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01325.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zheng Y, Zhang M, Qian M, et al. Genetic comparison of mouse lung telocytes with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:567–77. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun X, Zheng M, Zhang M, et al. Differences in the expression of chromosome 1 genes between lung telocytes and other cells: mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:801–10. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zheng M, Sun X, Zhang M, et al. Variations of chromosome 2 and 3 gene expression profiles among pulmonary telocytes, pneumocytes, airway cells, mesenchymal stem cells and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:2044–60. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zheng Y, Cretoiu D, Yan G, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of human lung telocytes with fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:568–89. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hinescu ME, Popescu LM. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in human atrial myocardium. J Cell Mol Med. 2005;9:972–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hinescu ME, Gherghiceanu M, Mandache E, et al. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in atrial myocardium: ultrastructural and immunohistochemical characterization. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10:243–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00306.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Hinescu ME, et al. Insights into the interstitium of ventricular myocardium: interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10:429–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00410.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mandache E, Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M. Myocardial interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) and their nanostructural relationships with intercalated discs: shed vesicles as intermediates. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:1175–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00117.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gherghiceanu M, Hinescu ME, Andrei F, et al. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in myocardial sleeves of human pulmonary veins. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1777–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00444.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Manole CG, et al. Cardiac renewing: interstitial Cajal-like cells nurse cardiomyocyte progenitors in epicardial stem cell niches. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:866–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00758.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kostin S, Popescu LM. A distinct type of cell in myocardium: interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLCs) J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:295–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00668.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cretoiu SM, Popescu LM. Telocytes revisited. BioMol Concepts. 2014;5:353–69. doi: 10.1515/bmc-2014-0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Manole CG, Cismaşiu V, Gherghiceanu M, et al. Experimental acute myocardial infarction: telocytes involvement in neo-angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:2284–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01449.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhao B, Liao Z, Chen S, et al. Intramyocardial transplantation of cardiac telocytes decreases myocardial infarction and improves post-infarcted cardiac function in rats. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:780–9. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Heterocellular communication in the heart: electron tomography of telocyte-myocyte junctions. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:1005–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01299.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Franke WW, Rickelt S, Barth M, et al. The junctions that don't fit the scheme: special symmetrical cell-cell junctions of their own kind. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;338:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00441-009-0849-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hinescu ME, Gherghiceanu M, Suciu L, et al. Telocytes in pleura: two- and three-dimensional imaging by transmission electron microscopy. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;343:389–97. doi: 10.1007/s00441-010-1095-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mühlfeld C, Nyengaard JR, Mayhew TM. A review of state-of-the-art stereology for better quantitative 3D morphology in cardiac research. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2010;19:65–82. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2008.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Marone G, Crescenzo G, Adt M, et al. Immunological characterisation and functional importance of human heart mast cells. Immunopharmacology. 1995;31:1–18. doi: 10.1016/0162-3109(95)00037-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fairweather D, Frisancho-Kiss S. Mast cells and inflammatory disease: potential drug targets. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2008;8:80–90. doi: 10.2174/187152908783884957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Simionescu M, Popov D, Sima A. Endothelial transcytosis in health and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;335:27–40. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0688-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Mandache E, et al. Caveolae in smooth muscles: nanocontacts. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10:960–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00539.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sims DE. The pericyte - a review. Tissue Cell. 1986;18:153–74. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(86)90026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Díaz-Flores L, Gutiérrez R, Madrid JF, et al. Pericytes. Morphofunction, interactions and pathology in a quiescent and activated mesenchymal cell niche. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:909–69. doi: 10.14670/HH-24.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nees S, Weiss DR, Juchem G. Focus on cardiac pericytes. Eur J Physiol. 2013;465:779–87. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1240-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Porter KE, Turner NA. Cardiac fibroblasts: at the heart of myocardial remodeling. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;123:255–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kohl P, Camelliti P, Burton FL, et al. Electrical coupling of fibroblasts and myocytes: relevance for cardiac propagation. J Electrocardiol. 2005;38:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Davis J, Molkentin JD. Myofibroblasts: trust your heart and let fate decide. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;70:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sun Y, Weber KT. Infarct scar: a dynamic tissue. Cardiovasc Res. 2000;46:250–6. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity in the heart. Circ Res. 2013;112:1624–33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lynton PJ, Thoman ML. Immunosenescence in monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells: lessons learned from the lung and heart. Immunol Lett. 2014;pii:S0165-2478(14)00196-5. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gherghiceanu M, Barad L, Novak A, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: comparative ultrastructure. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:2539–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01417.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schaper J, Meiser E, Stämmler G. Ultrastructural morphometric analysis of myocardium from dogs, rats, hamsters, mice and from human hearts. Circ Res. 1985;56:377–91. doi: 10.1161/01.res.56.3.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Barth E, Stämmler G, Speiser B, et al. Ultrastructural quantification of mitochondria and myofilaments in cardiac muscle from 10 different animal species including man. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992;24:669–81. doi: 10.1016/0022-2828(92)93381-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pinali C, Kitmitto A. Serial block face scanning electron microscopy for the study of cardiac muscle ultrastructure at nanoscale resolutions. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;76:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bergmann O, Bhardwaj RD, Bernard S, et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science. 2009;324:98–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1164680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yang P, Kenchegomda D, Fisher SA. Cardiac myocyte proliferation: not as simple as counting sheep. J Molec Cell Cardiol. 2014;74:125–6. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Anversa P, Hiler B, Ricci R, et al. Myocyte cell loss and myocyte hypertrophy in the aging rat heart. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:1441–8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80321-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Olivetti G, Melissari M, Capasso JM, et al. Cardiomyopathy of the aging human heart. Myocyte loss and reactive cellular hypertrophy. Circ Res. 1991;68:1560–8. doi: 10.1161/01.res.68.6.1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rakusan K, Flanagan MF, Geva T, et al. Morphometry of human coronary capillaries during normal growth and the effect of age in left-ventricular pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 1992;86:38–46. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Mayhew TM, Pharaon A, Austin A, et al. Stereological estimates of nuclear number in human ventricular cardiomyocytes before and after birth obtained using physical disectors. J Anat. 1997;191:107–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19110107.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wulfsohn D, Nyengaard JR, Tang Y. Postnatal growth of cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle of the rat. Anat Rec. 2004;277A:236–47. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Banerjee I, Fuseler JW, Price RL, et al. Determination of cell types and numbers during cardiac development in the neonatal and adult rat and mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293:H1883–91. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00514.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tang Y, Nyengaard JR, Andersen JB, et al. The application of stereological methods for estimating structural parameters in the human heart. The anatomical record. 2009;292:1630–47. doi: 10.1002/ar.20952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kajstura J, Gurusamy N, Ogórek B, et al. Myocyte turnover in the aging human heart. Circ Res. 2010;107:1374–86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.231498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mollova M, Bersell K, Walsh S, et al. Cardiomyocyte proliferation contributes to heart growth in young humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:1446–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214608110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Anversa P, Leri A. Innate regeneration of aging heart: healing from within. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:871–83. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Negro A, Boehm M. Cardiomyocyte maturation: it takes a village to raise a kid. J Molec Cell Cardiol. 2014;74:669–81. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Porrello ER, Widdop RE, Delbridge LM. Early origins of cardiac hypertrophy: does cardiomyocyte attrition programme for pathological ‘catch-up’ growth of the heart? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:1358–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mescher AL. Junqueira basic histology: text and atlas. 13th ed. Shanghai: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2013. p. 205. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Severs NJ. The cardiac muscle cell. BioEssays. 2000;22:188–99. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200002)22:2<188::AID-BIES10>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lajiness JD, Conway SJ. Origin, development, and differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;70:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Snider P, Standley KN, Wang J, et al. Origin of cardiac fibroblasts and the role of periostin. Circ Res. 2009;105:934–47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.201400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Souders CA, Bowers SL, Baudino TA. Cardiac fibroblast: the renaissance cell. Circ Res. 2009;105:1164–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.209809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Jugdutt BI. Ventricular remodeling after infarction and the extracellular collagen matrix: when is enough enough? Circulation. 2003;108:1395–403. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085658.98621.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kendall RT, Feghali-Bostwick CA. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Aurora AB, Porrello ER, Tan W, et al. Macrophages are required for neonatal heart regeneration. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1382–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI72181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE, et al. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity. 2014;40:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Campeanu RA, Radu BM, Cretoiu SM, et al. Near-infrared low-level laser stimulation of telocytes from human myometrium. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29:1867–74. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1589-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mandache E, Gherghiceanu M, Macarie C, et al. Telocytes in human isolated atrial amyloidosis: ultrastructural remodelling. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2739–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01200.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Manetti M, Rosa I, Messerini L, et al. A loss of telocytes accompanies fibrosis of multiple organs in systemic sclerosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:253–62. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;1114:763–76. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00687-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Chien KR. Stem cells: lost in translation. Nature. 2004;428:607–8. doi: 10.1038/nature02500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Boyle AJ, Schulman SP, Hare JM, et al. Is stem cell therapy ready for patients? Stem cell therapy for cardiac repair. Ready for the next step. Circulation. 2006;114:339–52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Boudoulas KD, Hatzopoulos AK. Cardiac repair and regeneration: the Rubik's cube of cell therapy for heart disease. Dis Model Mech. 2009;2:344–58. doi: 10.1242/dmm.000240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.du Pré BC, Doevendans PA, van Laake LW. Stem cells for cardiac repair: an introduction. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2013;10:186–97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Sanganalmath SK, Bolli R. Cell therapy for heart failure: a comprehensive overview of experimental and clinical studies, current challenges, and future directions. Circ Res. 2013;113:810–34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.de Jong R, van Hout GP, Houtgraaf JH, et al. Intracoronary infusion of encapsulated glucagon-like Peptide-1-eluting mesenchymal stem cells preserves left ventricular function in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:673–83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Behfar A, Crespo-Diaz R, Terzic A, et al. Cell therapy for cardiac repair-lessons from clinical trials. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:232–4. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Kostin S. Telocytes and heart renewing. In: Wang P, Kuo CH, Takeda N, Singal PK, et al., editors. Adaptation biology and medicine, vol 6. Cell adaptations and challenges. New Delhi: Narosa; 2011. pp. 17–39. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Suciu LC, et al. Telocytes and putative stem cells in the lungs: electron microscopy, electron tomography and laser scanning microscopy. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;345:391–403. doi: 10.1007/s00441-011-1229-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Popescu LM, Manole E, Serboiu CS, et al. Identification of telocytes in skeletal muscle interstitium: implication for muscle regeneration. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:1379–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ceafalan L, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM, et al. Telocytes in human skin–are they involved in skin regeneration? J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:1405–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01580.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Popescu BO, Gherghiceanu M, Kostin S, et al. Telocytes in meninges and choroid plexus. Neurosci Lett. 2012;516:265–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Luesma MJ, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Telocytes and stem cells in limbus and uvea of mouse eye. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1016–24. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Xiao J, Wang F, Liu Z, et al. Telocytes in liver: electron microscopic and immunofluorescent evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1537–42. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Wang F, Song Y, Bei Y, et al. Telocytes in liver regeneration: possible roles. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1720–6. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Haines DD, Juhasz B, Tosaki A. Management of multicellular senescence and oxidative stress. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:936–57. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]